35.260 - Office machines
ICS 35.260 Details
Office machines
Burotechnik
Machines de bureau
Pisarniški stroji
General Information
Frequently Asked Questions
ICS 35.260 is a classification code in the International Classification for Standards (ICS) system. It covers "Office machines". The ICS is a hierarchical classification system used to organize international, regional, and national standards, facilitating the search and identification of standards across different fields.
There are 147 standards classified under ICS 35.260 (Office machines). These standards are published by international and regional standardization bodies including ISO, IEC, CEN, CENELEC, and ETSI.
The International Classification for Standards (ICS) is a hierarchical classification system maintained by ISO to organize standards and related documents. It uses a three-level structure with field (2 digits), group (3 digits), and sub-group (2 digits) codes. The ICS helps users find standards by subject area and enables statistical analysis of standards development activities.
- Amendment5 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale in this classification provides a means for estimating the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and for comparing that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: (1) serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use; (2) the serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built; and (3) the serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodelling has been planned.
4.5 The use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for special facilities and technologies.
1.2 Each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-4, is for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (DEMAND Scale see Figs. 1-4) summarizes one level of requirement for serviceability on which occupants might require. The matching paragraph in the Facility Rating Scale (SUPPLY Scale see Figs. 1-4) is an interpretation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.13.1 for Group or Shared Conference Center
FIG. 1 Supply Scale A.13.1 for Group or Shared Conference Center (continued)
FIG. 2 Demand Scale A.13.2 for Video Conferencing Provision
FIG. 2 Supply Scale A.13.2 for Video Conferencing Provision (continued)
FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.13.3 for Simultaneous Interpretation
FIG. 3 Supply Scale A.13.3 for Simultaneous Interpretation (continued)
FIG. 4 Demand Scale A.13.4 for Satellite and Microwave Links
FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.13.4 for Satellite and Microwave Links (continued)
FIG. 5 Demand and Supply Scales A.13.5 for Telecommunications Center
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (See Figs. 1-4) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of service...
- Standard10 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard10 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-18) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape. Further information may be found in ISO 19208.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office equipment for information technology.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales, shown in Figs. 1-18, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two more demand functions and supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-18) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-18) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.5.1 for Density of Office Computers and Equipment
FIG. 2 Supply Scale A.5.1 for Density of Office Computers and Equipment
FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.5.2.1 for Location of Available Power
FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.5.2.1 for Power Distribution
FIG. 5 Demand Scale A.5.2.2 for Plug-in Points at Workstation
FIG. 6 Supply Scale A.5.2.2 for Plug-in Points per Workstation
FIG. 7 Demand Scale A.5.3 for Reliability and Quality of Supply
FIG. 8 Supply Scale A.5.3 for Reliability and Quality of Supply
FIG. 9 Demand Scale A.5.4.1 for Horizontal Distribution
FIG. 10 Supply Scale A.5.4.1 for Horizontal Distribution
FIG. 11 Demand Scale A.5.4.2 for Risers
FIG. 12 Supply Scale A.5.4.2 for Risers
FIG. 13 Demand Scale A.5.4.3 for Entrance Facility
FIG. 14 Supply Scale A.5.4.3 for Entrance Facility
FIG. 15 Demand Scale A.5.4.4 for Service to the Site
FIG. 16 Supply Scale A.5.4.4 for Service to the Site
FIG. 17 Demand Scale A.5.5 for Cable Plant
FIG. 18 Supply Scale A.5.5 for Cable Plant
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-18) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well ...
- Standard20 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard20 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
1.1 Equipment in the scope of this standard This European Standard specifies methods of measurement of electrical power consumption in networked standby and the reporting of the results for edge equipment. Power consumption in standby (other than networked standby) is covered by EN 50564, including the input voltage range. This European Standard also provides a method to test power management and whether it is possible to deactivate wireless network connection(s). NOTE 1 This standard has been written in particular to support Commission Regulation (EU) No 801/2013 for the measurement of energy consumption in networked standby. This standard applies to electrical products with a rated input voltage of 230 V a.c. for single phase products and 400 V a.c. for three phase products. NOTE 2 The measurement of energy consumption and performance of products during intended use are generally specified in product standards and are not covered by this standard. NOTE 3 The term "products" in this standard includes household appliances or information technology products, consumer electronics, audio, video and multimedia systems; however the measurement methodology could be applied to other products. Where this standard is referenced by more specific standards or procedures, these should define and name the relevant conditions to which this test procedure is applied. 1.2 Equipment not in the scope of this standard This European Standard does not apply to the measurement of electrical power consumption in networked standby for interconnecting equipment. NOTE Measurement of electrical power consumption in networked standby for interconnecting equipment is the subject of ETSI standard EN 303 423 "Environmental Engineering (EE) - Electrical and electronic household and office equipment; Measurement of networked standby power consumption for interconnecting equipment".
- Standard27 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document specifies methods of measurement of electrical power consumption in networked standby and the
reporting of the results for network interconnecting equipment.
Example of interconnecting equipment are in Annex B.
Power consumption in standby (other than networked standby) is covered by EN 50564 [1], including the input voltage
range.
The present document also provides a method to test power management and whether it is possible to deactivate
wireless network connection(s).
The present document applies to electrical products with a rated input voltage of 230 V a.c. for single phase products
and 400 V a.c. for three phase products.
The present document is produced under the mandate M/544 and can be used to demonstrate compliance to the EU
Regulation (EC) No 1275/2008 [i.1] amended by Regulation (EU) 801/2013 [i.2].
The present document does not apply to televisions as defined in Regulation (EC) No 642/2009 [i.10].
NOTE 1: The EU regulation 801/2013 [i.2] applies to equipment designed for use with a nominal voltage rating of
250 V and below.
NOTE 2: EU regulation 801/2013 [i.2] does not apply to electrical and electronic household and office equipment
placed on the market with a low voltage external power supply to work as intended.
NOTE 3: "Low voltage external power supply" is the definition provided in EU regulation 278/2009 [i.3].
NOTE 4: The measurement of energy consumption and performance of equipment during intended use are
generally specified in product standards and are not covered by the present document.
NOTE 5: Where the present document is referenced by more specific standards or procedures, these should define
and name the relevant conditions to which this test procedure is applied.
1.2 Equipment not in the scope of the present document
The present document does not apply to the measurement of electrical power consumption in networked standby for
edge equipment. The edge equipment is a networked equipment that can be connected to a network and interact with
that network or other devices and that does not have, as its primary function, the passing of network traffic to provide a
network. Edge equipment are covered in EN 50643 [i.8].
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
- Amendment5 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document provides background information and guidelines for the development of an ontology for office equipment. An example of how such a standard can be used to automate the identification of resources for colour is provided. NOTE Often the terms vocabulary and ontology are used with the same meaning.
- Technical report11 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document specifies accessibility guidelines to be considered when planning, developing and designing electrophotographic copying machines, page printers and multi-function devices. These guidelines are intended to improve accessibility required when primarily older persons, persons with disabilities and persons with temporary disabilities (hereafter referred to as older persons and persons with disabilities) use office equipment.
- Standard21 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document specifies the information to be included in the specification sheets for front projection type data projectors and the form of specification sheets. This document is not applicable to units for a rear screen projection.
- Standard23 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for layout and building factors.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales, shown in Figs. 1-12, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two or more demand functions or supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-12) summarizes one level of serviceability on that function, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout
FIG. 2 Demand Scale A.7.1.2 for Constraints of Population Density
FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade
FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout
FIG. 5 Supply Scale A.7.1.2 for Population Density Supported
FIG. 6 Supply Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade
FIG. 7 Demand Scale A.7.2.1 for Tolerance of Sound and Visual Conditions
FIG. 8 Demand Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors
FIG. 9 Supply Scale A.7.2.1 Constraints on Layout
FIG. 10 Supply Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors
FIG. 11 Demand Scale A.7.3 for Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs
FIG. 12 Supply Scale A.7.3 Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facil...
- Standard15 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard15 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
1.1 Equipment in the scope of this standard
This European Standard specifies methods of measurement of electrical power consumption in networked standby and the reporting of the results for edge equipment.
Power consumption in standby (other than networked standby) is covered by EN 50564, including the input voltage range.
This European Standard also provides a method to test power management and whether it is possible to deactivate wireless network connection(s).
NOTE 1 This standard has been written in particular to support Commission Regulation (EU) No 801/2013 for the measurement of energy consumption in networked standby. This standard applies to electrical products with a rated input voltage of 230 V a.c. for single phase products and 400 V a.c. for three phase products.
NOTE 2 The measurement of energy consumption and performance of products during intended use are generally specified in product standards and are not covered by this standard.
NOTE 3 The term "products" in this standard includes household appliances or information technology products, consumer electronics, audio, video and multimedia systems; however the measurement methodology could be applied to other products.
Where this standard is referenced by more specific standards or procedures, these should define and name the relevant conditions to which this test procedure is applied.
1.2 Equipment not in the scope of this standard
This European Standard does not apply to the measurement of electrical power consumption in networked standby for interconnecting equipment.
NOTE Measurement of electrical power consumption in networked standby for interconnecting equipment is the subject of ETSI standard EN 303 423 "Environmental Engineering (EE) - Electrical and electronic household and office equipment; Measurement of networked standby power consumption for interconnecting equipment".
- Standard27 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document specifies methods of measurement of electrical power consumption in networked standby and the
reporting of the results for network interconnecting equipment.
Example of interconnecting equipment are in Annex B.
Power consumption in standby (other than networked standby) is covered by CENELEC EN 50564 [1], including the
input voltage range.
The present document also provides a method to test power management and whether it is possible to deactivate
wireless network connection(s).
The present document applies to electrical products with a rated input voltage of 230 V a.c. for single phase products
and 400 V a.c. for three phase products.
The present document is produced under the mandate M/544 and can be used to demonstrate compliance to the EU
regulation 801/2013 [i.2].
NOTE 1: The EU regulation 801/2013 [i.2] applies to equipment designed for use with a nominal voltage rating of
250 V and below.
NOTE 2: EU regulation 801/2013 [i.2] does not apply to electrical and electronic household and office equipment
placed on the market with a low voltage external power supply to work as intended.
NOTE 3: "Low voltage external power supply" is the definition provided in EU regulation 278/2009 [i.3].
NOTE 4: The measurement of energy consumption and performance of equipment during intended use are
generally specified in product standards and are not covered by the present document.
NOTE 5: Where the present document is referenced by more specific standards or procedures, these should define
and name the relevant conditions to which this test procedure is applied.
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
ABSTRACT
This guide has been prepared to aid in the writing of material standards using the Classification D 4000 format.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification system covers ___ materials suitable for _____________. The inclusion or exclusion of recycled plastics in this classification system must be addressed here.
1.2 The properties included in this standard are those required to identify the compositions covered. Other requirements necessary to identify particular characteristics important to specialized applications are to be specified by using suffixes as given in Section 5.
1.3 This classification system and subsequent line callout (specification) are intended to provide a means of calling out plastic materials used in the fabrication of end items or parts. It is not intended for the selection of materials. Material selection can be made by those having expertise in the plastic field only after careful consideration of the design and the performance required of the part, the environment to which it will be exposed, the fabrication process to be employed, the costs involved, and the inherent properties of the material other than those covered by this standard.
Note 1: Insert Note 1 here to show the appropriate ISO equivalency statement.
1.4 The following precautionary caveat pertains only to the test method portion, Section 11, of this classification system: This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
- Guide5 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Guide5 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements to be able to do normal office tasks outside scheduled hours.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-4, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-4) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.10.1 for Operation Outside Normal Hours
FIG. 1 Scale A.10.1 for Operation Outside Normal Hours (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.10.2 for Support After Hours
FIG. 2 Scale A.10.2 for Support After Hours (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.10.3 for Temporary Loss of External Services
FIG. 3 Scale A.10.3 for Temporary Loss of External Services (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.10.4 for Continuity of Work (During Breakdowns)
FIG. 4 Scale A.10.4 for Continuity of Work (During Breakdowns) (continued)
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability, but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign...
- Standard10 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office work.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Fig. 1 through Fig. 6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying
FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying (continued)
FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General
FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.1.3 for Training Rooms for Computer Skills
FIG. 3 Scale A.1.3 for Training Rooms for Computer Skills (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.1.4 for Interview Rooms
FIG. 4 Scale A.1.4 for Interview Rooms (continued)
FIG. 5 Scale A.1.5 for Storage and Floor Loading
FIG. 5 Scale A.1.5 for Storage and Floor Loading (continued)
FIG. 6 Scale A.1.6 for Shipping and Receiving
FIG. 6 Scale A.1.6 for Shipping and Receiving (continued)
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been plan...
- Standard16 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each facility rating scale in this classification provides a means for estimating the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and for comparing that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: (1) the serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use; (2) the serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built; and (3) the serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodeling has been planned.
4.5 The use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment or fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements to protect occupant assets.
1.2 Each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-8, printed side by side on a page, are for classifying one topic of serviceability within that aspect of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-8) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic that occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-8) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility that, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.8.1 for Control of Access from Building Public Zone to Occupant Reception Zone
FIG. 1 Scale A.8.1 for Control of Access from Building Public Zone to Occupant Reception Zone (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.8.2 for Interior Zones of Security
FIG. 2 Scale A.8.2 for Interior Zones of Security (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.8.3 for Vaults and Secure Rooms
FIG. 3 Scale A.8.3 for Vaults and Secure Rooms (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.8.4 for Security of Cleaning Service Systems
FIG. 4 Scale A.8.4 for Security of Cleaning Service Systems (continued)
FIG. 5 Scale A.8.5 for Security of Maintenance Service Systems
FIG. 6 Scale A.8.6 for Security of Renovations Outside Active Hours
FIG. 6 Scale A.8.6 for Security of Renovations Outside Active Hours (continued)
FIG. 7 Scale A.8.7 for Systems for Secure Garbage
FIG. 8 Scale A.8.8 for Security of Key and Card Control Systems
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-8) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, rapidly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be...
- Standard15 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each facility rating scale in this classification (see Figs. 1-8) provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such aslocation, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology, and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales (see Figs. 1-8) for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for manageability. (A) The anticipated remaining service life on the items listed in this table should be on file, likely in an asset management plan for the facility. Otherwise, rating on this aspect of serviceability requires expert judgement on each item, and cannot be completed within a normal half-day site visit. If information is not available, then omit this item from the rating, and note that on the rating form.(B) Do not add pro rata counts for any remaining life that is estimated to be less than the threshold years given in the legend. The count in this table is not a sliding scale, for example, give all points or no points.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
- Standard15 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2-7) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for protection of a building or site.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 2-7, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 2-7) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2-7) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Zones of Physical Security
FIG. 2 Scale A.9.1 for Protection Around Building
FIG. 2 Scale A.9.1 for Protection Around Building (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.9.2 for Protection from Unauthorized Access to Site and Parking
FIG. 3 Scale A.9.2 for Protection from Unauthorized Access to Site and Parking (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.9.3 for Protective Surveillance of Site
FIG. 4 Scale A.9.3 for Protective Surveillance of Site (continued)
FIG. 5 Scale A.9.4 for Perimeter of Building
FIG. 5 Scale A.9.4 for Perimeter of Building (continued)
FIG. 6 Scale A.9.5 for Public Zone of Building
FIG. 6 Scale A.9.5 for Public Zone of Building (continued)
FIG. 7 Scale A.9.6 for Facility Protection Services
FIG. 7 Scale A.9.6 for Facility Protection Services (continued)
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2-7) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line...
- Standard14 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-7) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for image to the public and occupants.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-7, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-7) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-7) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.11.1 for Exterior Appearance
FIG. 1 Scale A.11.1 for Exterior Appearance (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.11.2 for Public Lobby of Building
FIG. 2 Scale A.11.2 for Public Lobby of Building (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.11.3 for Public Spaces Within the Building
FIG. 3 Scale A.11.3 for Public Spaces Within the Building (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.11.4 for Appearance and Spaciousness of Office Spaces
FIG. 5 Scale A.11.5 for Finishes and Materials in Office Spaces
FIG. 6 Scale A.11.6 for Identity Outside the Building
FIG. 6 Scale A.11.6 for Identity Outside the Building (continued)
FIG. 7 Scale A.11.7 for Neighborhood and Site
FIG. 7 Scale A.11.7 for Neighborhood and Site (continued)
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-7) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared. ...
- Standard14 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.3.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.3.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.3.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.4 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.5 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.6 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for cleanliness.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-5, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-5) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale B.4.1 for Exterior and Public Areas
FIG. 1 Scale B.4.1 for Exterior and Public Areas (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale B.4.2 for Office Areas (Interior)
FIG. 3 Scale B.4.3 for Toilets and Washrooms
FIG. 4 Scale B.4.4 for Special Cleaning
FIG. 5 Scale B.4.5 for Waste Disposal for Building
FIG. 5 Scale B.4.5 for Waste Disposal for Building (continued)
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning and rating a facility and not for evaluating or diagnosing it.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
- Standard8 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.3.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.3.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.3.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.4 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.5 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.6 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for operations and maintenance.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-4, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-4) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale B.3.1 for Strategy and Program for Operations and Maintenance
FIG. 1 Scale B.3.1 for Strategy and Program for Operations and Maintenance (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale B.3.2 for Competences of In-house Staff
FIG. 2 Scale B.3.2 for Competences of In-house Staff (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale B.3.3 for Occupant Satisfaction
FIG. 3 Scale B.3.3 for Occupant Satisfaction (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale B.3.4 for Information on Unit Costs and Consumption
FIG. 4 Scale B.3.4 for Information on Unit Costs and Consumption (continued)
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning and rating a facility and not for evaluating or diagnosing it.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.
1.6 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance wit...
- Standard10 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements in support of recruiting and keeping quality employees.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.12.1 for Food
FIG. 1 Scale A.12.1 for Food (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.12.2 for Shops
FIG. 3 Scale A.12.3 for Daycare
FIG. 4 Scale A.12.4 for Exercise Room
FIG. 5 Scale A.12.5 for Bicycle Racks for Staff
FIG. 6 Scale A.12.6 for Seating Away from Work Areas
FIG. 6 Scale A.12.6 for Seating Away from Work Areas (continued)
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each...
- Standard9 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification contains pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for locating the building and finding the way inside the building.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.14.1 for Public Transportation (Urban Sites)
FIG. 2 Scale A.14.2 for Staff Visits to Other Offices
FIG. 3 Scale A.14.3 for Vehicular Entry and Parking
FIG. 3 Scale A.14.3 for Vehicular Entry and Parking (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.14.4 for Wayfinding to Building and Lobby
FIG. 4 Scale A.14.4 for Wayfinding to Building and Lobby (continued)
FIG. 5 Scale A.14.5 for Capacity of Internal Movement Systems
FIG. 5 Scale A.14.5 for Capacity of Internal Movement Systems (continued)
FIG. 6 Scale A.14.6 for Public Circulation and Wayfinding in Building
FIG. 6 Scale A.14.6 for Public Circulation and Wayfinding in Building (continued)
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classificatio...
- Standard12 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale in this classification provides a means for estimating the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and for comparing that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: (1) the serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use; (2) the serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built; and (3) the serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodelling has been planned.
4.5 The use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment or fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements to accommodate changes in working method, and frequent relocations of staff, and realignment of workstations.
1.2 Each pair of scales shown in Figs. 1-5, printed side by side on a page, are for classifying one topic of serviceability within that aspect of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-5) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic that occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility that, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.6.1 for Disruption Due to Physical Change
FIG. 1 Scale A.6.1 for Disruption Due to Physical Change (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.6.2 for Illumination, HVAC, and Sprinklers
FIG. 2 Scale A.6.2 for Illumination, HVAC, and Sprinklers (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.6.3 for Minor Changes to Layout
FIG. 3 Scale A.6.3 for Minor Changes to Layout (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.6.4 for Partition Wall Relocations
FIG. 4 Scale A.6.4 for Partition Wall Relocations (continued)
FIG. 5 Scale A.6.5 for Lead Time for Facilities Group
FIG. 5 Scale A.6.5 for Lead Time for Facilities Group (continued)
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indi...
- Standard11 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements to enable work groups or project groups to function effectively and productively.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-4, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-4) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.2.1 for Meeting and Conference Rooms
FIG. 1 Scale A.2.1 for Meeting and Conference Rooms (continued)
FIG. 1 Scale A.2.1 for Meeting and Conference Rooms (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.2.2 for Informal Meetings and Interaction
FIG. 2 Scale A.2.2 for Informal Meetings and Interaction (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.2.3 for Group Layout and Territory
FIG. 3 Scale A.2.3 for Group Layout and Territory (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.2.4 for Group Workrooms
FIG. 4 Scale A.2.4 for Group Workrooms (continued)
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceabi...
- Standard12 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology, and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for suitable sound and visual conditions.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.3.1 for Privacy and Speech Intelligibility
FIG. 1 Scale A.3.1 for Privacy and Speech Intelligibility (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.3.2 for Distraction and Disturbance
FIG. 2 Scale A.3.2 for Distraction and Disturbance (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.3.3 for Vibration
FIG. 4 Scale A.3.4 for Lighting and Glare
FIG. 4 Scale A.3.4 for Lighting and Glare (continued)
FIG. 5 Scale A.3.5 for Adjustment of Lighting by Occupants
FIG. 5 Scale A.3.5 for Adjustment of Lighting by Occupants (continued)
FIG. 6 Scale A.3.6 for Distant and Outside Views
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to condu...
- Standard12 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
The present document specifies methods of measurement of electrical power consumption in networked standby and the
reporting of the results for network interconnecting equipment.
Example of interconnecting equipment are in Annex B.
Power consumption in standby (other than networked standby) is covered by CENELEC EN 50564 [1], including the
input voltage range.
The present document also provides a method to test power management and whether it is possible to deactivate
wireless network connection(s).
The present document applies to electrical products with a rated input voltage of 230 V a.c. for single phase products
and 400 V a.c. for three phase products.
The present document is produced under the mandate M/544 and can be used to demonstrate compliance to the EU
regulation 801/2013 [i.2].
NOTE 1: The EU regulation 801/2013 [i.2] applies to equipment designed for use with a nominal voltage rating of
250 V and below.
NOTE 2: EU regulation 801/2013 [i.2] does not apply to electrical and electronic household and office equipment
placed on the market with a low voltage external power supply to work as intended.
NOTE 3: "Low voltage external power supply" is the definition provided in EU regulation 278/2009 [i.3].
NOTE 4: The measurement of energy consumption and performance of equipment during intended use are
generally specified in product standards and are not covered by the present document.
NOTE 5: Where the present document is referenced by more specific standards or procedures, these should define
and name the relevant conditions to which this test procedure is applied.
- Standard32 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard32 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard32 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale in this classification (see Figs. 1-24) provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology, and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales (see Figs. 1-24) for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for structure and building envelope.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales (see Figs. 1-24) is for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two more demand functions and supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale summarizes one level of serviceability on that function, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-24) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group, over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability, but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1679. The scales in Figs. 1-24 are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1679. Each requires the other.
1.6 The scales are intended to identify the levels of various requirements unique to a particular user, and the serviceability (capability) of a building to meet those requirements. The scales thus supplement rather than include code requirements. It remains the responsibility of designers, builders, and building managers to meet applicable code requirements relative to their respective roles in facility design, construction, and...
- Standard25 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard25 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
ISO 9295:2015 specifies four methods for the determination of the sound power levels of high-frequency noise emitted by machinery and equipment in the frequency range covered by the octave band centred at 16 kHz, which includes frequencies between 11,2 kHz and 22,4 kHz. They are complementary to the methods described in ISO 3741 and ISO 3744. The first three methods are based on the reverberation test room technique. The fourth method makes use of a free field over a reflecting plane.
The test conditions which prescribe the installation and operation of the equipment are those specified in ISO 3741 or ISO 3744 as applicable.
- Standard27 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
IEC/TS 62441:2011 Introduces safeguards to reduce the likelihood of room flash-over as a result of accidental ignition of exterior housings of audio/video and information communication technology products likely to be used in the home, caused by a candle flame. This second edition of IEC 62441 cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2006 and constitutes a technical revision. This edition includes the following technical changes with respect to the previous edition: - acceptance of wood with a minimum thickness as equivalent to V-1; - interpretation information regarding vertical surfaces.
- Technical specification14 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
IEC/TS 62441:2011 Introduces safeguards to reduce the likelihood of room flash-over as a result of accidental ignition of exterior housings of audio/video and information communication technology products likely to be used in the home, caused by a candle flame. This second edition of IEC 62441 cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2006 and constitutes a technical revision. This edition includes the following technical changes with respect to the previous edition:
- acceptance of wood with a minimum thickness as equivalent to V-1;
- interpretation information regarding vertical surfaces.
- Technical specification22 pagesEnglish and French languagesale 15% off
Superseded by CLC/TS 62441:2012
- Technical specification11 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
Specification introduces safeguards to reduce the likelihood of flame spread that could lead to room flash-over as a result of accidental ignition of exterior housings of audio/video and information communication technology products.
- Technical specification17 pagesEnglish and French languagesale 15% off
This International Standard defines the test methods used to measure power consumption of information technology equipment (ITE) under various modes of operation for the purpose of energy management. ITE includes the products identified in the scope of EN 60950-1.
- Standard10 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
ISO/IEC 24700:2004 specifies product characteristics for use in an original equipment manufacturer's or authorized third party's declaration of conformity to demonstrate that a marketed product that contains reused components performs equivalent to new, meeting equivalent to new component specifications and performance criteria, and continues to meet all the safety and environmental criteria required by responsibly built products. It is relevant to marketed products whose manufacturing and recovery processes result in the reuse of components. Annex C has a description of how reuse relates to other recycling processes. ISO/IEC 24700:2004 is applicable to: A situation in which a government requires a neutral benchmark to evaluate the quality, safety and performance of equipment that contains reused components and to demonstrate the environmental responsibility of the supplier. When regulations mandate a neutral benchmark for equipment, ISO/IEC 24700:2004 provides the benchmark for proving compliance with such regulations. A situation in which a commercial supplier requires a neutral benchmark to demonstrate and communicate the quality, safety and performance of equipment that contains reused components and to demonstrate the environmental responsibility of the supplier. Situations in which consumers require a neutral benchmark to identify or distinguish environmentally responsible products. ISO/IEC 24700:2004 reflects the world's current approaches that yield products from many manufacturing processes including the reuse of components, with the equipment's warranties and guarantees playing an important role in market acceptance. In today's procurement processes, technical equipment definitions used by regulators must be addressed and, in that sense, ISO/IEC 24700:2004 will be useful in procurement and in the trade facilitation area, to communicate with regulators. ISO/IEC 24700:2004 specifically addresses office equipment. However, in the future it may provide valuable directions for other industries and industrial sectors.
- Standard10 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This International Standard defines the test methods used to measure power consumption of information technology equipment (ITE) under various modes of operation for the purpose of energy management. ITE includes the products identified in the scope of IEC 60950-1.
- Standard13 pagesEnglish and French languagesale 15% off
This standard is applicable to mains-powered or battery-powered information technology equipment, including electrical business equipment and associated equipment, with a RATED VOLTAGE not exceeding 600 V. This standard is also applicable to such information technology equipment: - designed for use as telecommunication terminal equipment and TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK infrastructure equipment, regardless of the source of power; - designed and intended to be connected directly to, or used as infrastructure equipment in, a CABLE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, regardless of the source of power; - designed to use the AC MAINS SUPPLY as a communication transmission medium This standard specifies requirements intended to reduce risks of fire, electric shock or injury for the OPERATOR and layman who may come into contact with the equipment and, where specifically stated, for a SERVICE PERSON. This first edition of IEC 60950-1 cancels and replaces the third edition of IEC 60950, issued in 1999, and constitutes a technical revision.
- Standard271 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard271 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
- Standard541 pagesEnglish and French languagesale 15% off
Describes the principal widths to be retained for fabric printing ribbons, also for two-coloured ones, of 19 mm (0,75 in) width and less, on spools, intended for office machines and printing machines used for information processing.
- Standard1 pageEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard1 pageFrench languagesale 15% off
- Standard1 pageFrench languagesale 15% off
Applies to dictation machines, transcription machines and to combined dictation and transcription machines. Serves to define role of these machines and to describe elements to ensure their effective operation and to specify operating requirements. References: ISO 4062; 5138/1.
- Standard5 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard5 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
- Standard5 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
Includes preferred line spacings and character spacings for office machines and data processing equipment. Is intended to provide compatibility between forms and the machines used for their completion regarding line spacings and character spacings by giving guidance to machine manufacturers and forms designers on the preferred spacings to be used.
- Standard1 pageEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard1 pageFrench languagesale 15% off
- Standard1 pageFrench languagesale 15% off
Includes the principal widths to be retained for fabric printing ribbons wider than 19 mm on spolls intended for office machines and machines used for information processing. Complements ISO 2257.
- Standard1 pageEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard1 pageFrench languagesale 15% off
- Standard1 pageFrench languagesale 15% off
Identifies the minimum line and character capacity of address masters as a first attempt to work towards the rationalization of the existing capacity of address masters.
- Standard1 pageEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard1 pageFrench languagesale 15% off
- Standard1 pageFrench languagesale 15% off
Includes the principal widths to be retained for narrow one-time paper or plastic printing ribbons (19 mm width and less) intended for office machines and printing machines used for information processing. Also defines the location of the marking indicating the approach of the end of the ribbons for office machines. Reference: ISO 2257.
- Standard1 pageEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard1 pageFrench languagesale 15% off
- Standard1 pageFrench languagesale 15% off
Includes the basic arrangement of figures and symboles on keyboards intended for applications in which the data is mostly numeric. Reference: ISO 1092.
- Standard3 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard3 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
- Standard3 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
Lays down rules for facilitating the storage and distribution of printing ribbons on the premises of manufacterers, dealers and users. Specifies the type and form of minimum information to appear on containers used as packaging unit for printing ribbons wound on spools or cores.
- Standard1 pageEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard2 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
- Standard2 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
Provides the most important characteristics of cores which are used to carry paper or plastic open spools printing ribbons of a nominal width of 8 mm intended for office machines and printing machines in information processing.
- Standard2 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard2 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
- Standard2 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
This CEN report gives information on (the European national keyboards) keyboards used for European languages and shows how national bodies are using the international keyboard standards. It also considers common existing approaches on the future of keyboards and informs on the future international standardization..
The scope for the project according to CEN/TC 304 N872 "A meeting on the Keyboard PT in Nov 1998" is the following:
EUROPEAN KEYBOARDS. The deliverable is a CEN report giving guidance on the application of international keyboard standards in Europe. It will map how national bodies are using international keyboard standards, what national standards there are and give guidance to common approaches. The team shall, in contact with ISO, investigate the future of keyboards. Special attention shall be given to the Euro Sign on keyboards.
The report addresses this scope as follows:
How national bodies are using international keyboard standards and guidance to common approaches is given in clause 5 and Annex 3
National standards are listed in Annex 2
The future of keyboard standardization is discussed in section 6
The euro sign on keyboards is discussed in clause 5.4.
Clause 4 in this report gives information on international standards for keyboards. Of these ISO/IEC 9995 and ISO 9241-4 are most commonly used. (For exact references see clause 7)
Clause 5 gives common information on the use of these standards and on the euro sign on keyboards.
Clause 6 gives some information on future standardization.
Annex 2 gives information from the National Bodies on keyboard standards used in their countries.
Annex 3 gives some more information on the layout of a number of keyboards for European languages.
The report is meant to give guidance to many parties:
· A country which decides to make its own keyboard standard may use it as background information on what other countries have standardized.
...
- Technical report44 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
- Standard10 pagesEnglish and French languagesale 15% off
- Standard50 pagesEnglish and French languagesale 15% off
- Standard10 pagesEnglish and French languagesale 15% off