ASTM E1664-19
(Classification)Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Layout and Building Factors
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Layout and Building Factors<rangeref></rangeref >
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for layout and building factors.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales, shown in Figs. 1-12, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two or more demand functions or supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-12) summarizes one level of serviceability on that function, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout
FIG. 2 Demand Scale A.7.1.2 for Constraints of Population Density
FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade
FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout
FIG. 5 Supply Scale A.7.1.2 for Population Density Supported
FIG. 6 Supply Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade
FIG. 7 Demand Scale A.7.2.1 for Tolerance of Sound and Visual Conditions
FIG. 8 Demand Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors
FIG. 9 Supply Scale A.7.2.1 Constraints on Layout
FIG. 10 Supply Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors
FIG. 11 Demand Scale A.7.3 for Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs
FIG. 12 Supply Scale A.7.3 Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facil...
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 31-Mar-2019
- Technical Committee
- E06 - Performance of Buildings
- Drafting Committee
- E06.25 - Whole Buildings and Facilities
Relations
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2019
- Effective Date
- 15-Nov-2019
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2017
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2016
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2015
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2014
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2013
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2012
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2012
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2012
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2009
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2009
- Effective Date
- 01-Jun-2006
Overview
ASTM E1664-19: Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Layout and Building Factors provides a framework for categorizing the serviceability of office facilities, specifically focusing on how well a building meets functional requirements related to layout and key building features. Developed by ASTM International, this classification enables users to estimate and compare levels of serviceability across existing, planned, or remodeled office spaces, promoting informed decisions during design, renovation, and facility management processes.
By employing matched sets of scales for various serviceability topics, ASTM E1664-19 supports rapid, economical evaluations for office buildings regardless of their structure, age, mechanical systems, or location. The standard is not a rating system or evaluation tool but serves as a guide for preliminary comparisons and planning.
Key Topics
- Serviceability Classification: Utilizes matched scales to translate occupant requirements into indicative facility features, making it possible to estimate how well a given office space might fulfill the needs of different user groups.
- Layout and Building Factors: Considers aspects such as constraints on layout, population density, costs of upgrades, tolerance to sound and visual environments, and the influence of building loss features on space needs.
- Rapid Assessment: Enables quick estimation of whether a facility is likely to meet certain serviceability requirements without requiring detailed measurement or extensive engineering analysis.
- Non-Regulatory Use: This standard is not intended for code compliance, fire risk assessment, or regulatory purposes.
- Scope Limitations: Applicable to building constructions and their components, but not suited for non-building facilities.
Applications
ASTM E1664-19 is highly valuable for a range of professionals in the building and facility management sectors, supporting:
- Office Planning and Design: Estimate serviceability levels of office facilities in the early planning or schematic design phase, ensuring layout and building factors align with the intended occupant usage.
- Facility Comparison: Compare different buildings, regardless of age or system differences, to select the most suitable office space based on serviceability factors.
- Remodeling and Repurposing: Assess potential changes in serviceability for facilities being considered for uses other than their current function or for those scheduled for renovation.
- Portfolio Management: Provide a consistent method for analyzing serviceability variance within a portfolio of office buildings.
- Strategic Space Planning: Inform decisions about space allocation and office design strategies based on serviceability classifications.
Related Standards
Strengthen office facility management and design by referencing these related standards:
- ASTM E631: Terminology of Building Constructions - definitions and terminology used in facility classification.
- ASTM E1679: Practice for Setting Serviceability Requirements - guides requirements and determination of provided serviceability.
- ASTM E1836/E1836M: Practice for Building Floor Area Measurements for Facility Management.
- ASTM E2320: Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Thermal Environment and Indoor Air Conditions.
- ASTM E2619/E2619M: Practice for Measuring and Calculating Building Loss Features That Take Up Floor Area in Buildings.
- ASHRAE 62.1: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality.
- ANSI Z65.1: Method for Measuring Floor Area in Office Buildings.
- ISO 6240: Performance Standards in Building - Contents and Presentation.
Practical Value
ASTM E1664-19 delivers practical value to architects, facility managers, corporate real estate professionals, and building owners seeking to:
- Make informed decisions during office space selection and development.
- Efficiently plan renovations and upgrades to optimize workspace layouts.
- Benchmark serviceability across multiple facilities for strategic management.
- Avoid extensive, costly evaluations in initial planning phases by leveraging indicative, function-focused assessment scales.
Keep in mind that this standard supplements, rather than replaces, code and regulatory requirements. For technical evaluation or compliance, additional expertise and standards may be required. For official documentation and detailed methodologies, consult the current ASTM E1664-19 document and related practices.
Buy Documents
ASTM E1664-19 - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Layout and Building Factors<rangeref></rangeref >
REDLINE ASTM E1664-19 - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Layout and Building Factors<rangeref></rangeref >
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard
BSI Group
BSI (British Standards Institution) is the business standards company that helps organizations make excellence a habit.
NYCE
Mexican standards and certification body.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM E1664-19 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Layout and Building Factors<rangeref></rangeref >". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility. 4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape. 4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities. 4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: 4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use. 4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built. 4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned. 4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements. 4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.) 4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment. SCOPE 1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for layout and building factors. 1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales, shown in Figs. 1-12, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two or more demand functions or supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-12) summarizes one level of serviceability on that function, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability. FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout FIG. 2 Demand Scale A.7.1.2 for Constraints of Population Density FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout FIG. 5 Supply Scale A.7.1.2 for Population Density Supported FIG. 6 Supply Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade FIG. 7 Demand Scale A.7.2.1 for Tolerance of Sound and Visual Conditions FIG. 8 Demand Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors FIG. 9 Supply Scale A.7.2.1 Constraints on Layout FIG. 10 Supply Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors FIG. 11 Demand Scale A.7.3 for Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs FIG. 12 Supply Scale A.7.3 Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs 1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing. 1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facil...
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility. 4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape. 4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities. 4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: 4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use. 4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built. 4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned. 4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements. 4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.) 4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment. SCOPE 1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for layout and building factors. 1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales, shown in Figs. 1-12, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two or more demand functions or supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-12) summarizes one level of serviceability on that function, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability. FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout FIG. 2 Demand Scale A.7.1.2 for Constraints of Population Density FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout FIG. 5 Supply Scale A.7.1.2 for Population Density Supported FIG. 6 Supply Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade FIG. 7 Demand Scale A.7.2.1 for Tolerance of Sound and Visual Conditions FIG. 8 Demand Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors FIG. 9 Supply Scale A.7.2.1 Constraints on Layout FIG. 10 Supply Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors FIG. 11 Demand Scale A.7.3 for Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs FIG. 12 Supply Scale A.7.3 Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs 1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing. 1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facil...
ASTM E1664-19 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 35.260 - Office machines. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM E1664-19 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM E1664-95a(2018), ASTM E2320-19, ASTM E2320-04(2018), ASTM E1662-95a(2018), ASTM E2619/E2619M-17, ASTM E1836/E1836M-09(2016), ASTM E631-15, ASTM E631-14, ASTM E1679-13, ASTM E1679-95(2012), ASTM E1662-95a(2012), ASTM E2320-04(2012), ASTM E2619/E2619M-09e1, ASTM E1836/E1836M-09e1, ASTM E631-06. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM E1664-19 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation:E1664 −19
Standard Classification for
Serviceability of an Office Facility for Layout and Building
1,2
Factors
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1664; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope serviceability score. That information is found in Practice
E1679. The scales in this classification are complimentary to
1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales for
and compatible with Practice E1679. Each requires the other.
classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility,
that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain 1.6 The scales are intended to identify the levels of various
possible requirements for layout and building factors. requirements unique to a particular user, and the serviceability
(capability) of a building to meet those requirements. The
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of
scales thus supplement rather than include code requirements.
scales, shown in Figs. 1-12, are for classifying one topic of
It remain the responsibility of designers, builders, and building
serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two or
managerstomeetapplicablecoderequirementsrelativetotheir
more demand functions or supply features. Each paragraph in
respective roles in facility design, construction, and ongoing
an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-12) summarizes
management.
one level of serviceability on that function, which occupants
might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale 1.7 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded
(see Figs. 1-12) is a translation of the requirement into a as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
description of certain features of a facility which, taken in conversions to SI units that are provided for information only
combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that and are not considered standard.
level of required serviceability.
1.8 This international standard was developed in accor-
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12)
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
scanningtoestimateapproximately,quickly,andeconomically,
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not
for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is
2. Referenced Documents
performing.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of
E631 Terminology of Building Constructions
serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to
E1662 Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility
estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned
for Sound and Visual Environment
but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings
E1679 PracticeforSettingtheRequirementsfortheService-
and outline specifications have been prepared.
ability of a Building or Building-Related Facility, and for
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility
Determining What Serviceability is Provided or Proposed
to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state
E1836/E1836M Practice for Building Floor Area Measure-
how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a
ments for Facility Management
E2320 Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility
for Thermal Environment and Indoor Air Conditions
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on
E2619/E2619M Practice for Measuring and Calculating
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.25
Building Loss Features That Take Up Floor Area in
on Whole Buildings and Facilities.
Buildings
Current edition approved April 1, 2019. Published May 2019. Originally
approved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2018 as E1664–95a (2018).
DOI: 10.1520/E1664–19.
2 3
Portions of this document are based on material originally prepared by the For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
International Centre for Facilities (ICF) and © 1993 by ICF and Minister of Public contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Works and Government Services Canada. Their cooperation in the development of Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
this standard is acknowledged. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E1664−19
FIG. 1Demand Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout
E1664−19
FIG. 2Demand Scale A.7.1.2 for Constraints of Population Density
2.2 ISO Document: 3.1.3 facility, n—a physical setting used to serve a specific
ISO 6240 International Standard, Performance Standards in purpose. E631
Building—Contents and Presentation
3.1.3.1 Discussion—A facility may be within a building, a
whole building, or a building with its site and surrounding
2.3 ANSI/ASHRAE Standard:
environment; or it may be a construction that is not a building.
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2016 Ventilation forAccept-
The term encompasses both the physical object and its use.
able Indoor Air Quality
3.1.4 facility serviceability—the capability of a facility to
3. Terminology
perform the function(s) for which it is designed, used, or
required to be used. E631
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.4.1 Discussion—The scope of this performance is of the
3.1.1 assignable area, n—portion of the plannable area on a
facility as a system, including its subsystems, components and
floor than can be assigned to occupant groups or functions.
materials and their interactions, such as acoustical,
3.1.1.1 Discussion—Assignable area includes interior walls,
hydrothermal, air purity, and economic; and of the relative
building columns and projections, and secondary circulation.
importance of each performance requirement.
E1836/E1836M
3.1.5 HVAC, n—the mechanical system(s) providing
3.1.2 building loss factor, n—in a facility, expressed as a
percentage of a facility’s exterior gross area, the space not heating, ventilation, and air conditioning to a building.
actually or effectively available for planning because of build-
3.1.6 offıce, n—a place, such as a room, suite, or building, in
ing configuration. E2619/E2619M
which business, clerical, or professional activities
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: E1664 − 95a (Reapproved 2018) E1664 − 19 An American National Standard
Standard Classification for
Serviceability of an Office Facility for Layout and Building
1,2
Factors
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1664; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This classification covers pairs matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that
is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for layout and building factors.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair matched set of scales, shown in Figs. 1-312, are for classifying one topic of
serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two or more demand functions or supply features. Each paragraph in an
Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-312) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic,function, which occupants
might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-312) is a translation of the requirement into a description
of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required
serviceability.
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-312) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning
to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type
of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate
the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline
specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how
to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334E1679. The
scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334E1679. Each requires the other.
1.6 The scales are intended to identify the levels of various requirements unique to a particular user, and the serviceability
(capability) of a building to meet those requirements. The scales thus supplement rather than include code requirements. It remain
the responsibility of designers, builders, and building managers to meet applicable code requirements relative to their respective
roles in facility design, construction, and ongoing management.
1.7 The values stated in SIinch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
conversions to inch-poundSI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.8 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E631 Terminology of Building Constructions
E1334E1662 PracticeClassification for Rating the Serviceability of a Building or Building-Related FacilityServiceability of an
Office Facility for Sound and Visual Environment (Withdrawn 2013)
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.25 on Whole
Buildings and Facilities.
Current edition approved March 1, 2018April 1, 2019. Published March 2018May 2019. Originally approved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 20122018 as
E1664 – 95a (2012).E1664–95a (2018). DOI: 10.1520/E1664-95AR18.10.1520/E1664–19.
Portions of this document are based on material originally prepared by the International Centre for Facilities (ICF) and © 1993 by ICF and Minister of Public Works
and Government Services Canada. Their cooperation in the development of this standard is acknowledged.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E1664 − 19
FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.7.1 for Influence of HVAC A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout
E1664 − 19
FIG. 2 Demand Scale A.7.1.2 for Constraints of Population Density
E1679 Practice for Setting the Requirements for the Serviceability of a Building or Building-Related Facility, and for
Determining What Serviceability is Provided or Proposed
E1836/E1836M Practice for Building Floor Area Measurements for Facility Management
E2320 Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Thermal Environment and Indoor Air Conditions
E2619/E2619M Practice for Measuring and Calculating Building Loss Features That Take Up Floor Area in Buildings
2.2 ISO Document:
ISO 6240 International Standard, Performance Standards in Building—Contents and Presentation
2.3 ASHRAEANSI/ASHRAE Standard:
ASHRAE 62-89ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2016 Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality
2.4 ANSI Document:
ANSI Z65.1 Method for Measuring Floor Area in Office Buildings
Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St., 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
Available from American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (ASHRAE), 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329,
http://www.ashrae.org.
E1664 − 19
FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 assignable area, n—portion of the plannable area on a floor than can be assigned to occupant groups or functions.
3.1.1.1 Discussion—
Assignable area includes interior walls, building columns and projections, and secondary circulation. E1836/E1836M
3.1.2 building loss factor, n—in a facility, expressed as a percentage of a facility’s exterior gross area, the space not actually
or effectively available for planning because of building configuration. E2619/E2619M
3.1.3 facility—facility, n—a physical setting used to serve a specific purpose. E631
3.1.3.1 Discussion—
E1664 − 19
FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout
A facility may be within a building, a whole building, or a building with its site and surrounding environment; or it may be a
construction that is not a building. The term encompasses both the physical object and its use.
3.1.4 facility serviceability—the capability of a facility to perform the function(s) for which it is designed, used, or required to
be used. E631
3.1.4.1 Discussion—
E1664 − 19
FIG. 5 Supply Scale A.7.1.2 for Population Density Supported
The scope of this performance is of the facility as a system, including its subsystems, components and materials and their
interactions, such as acoustical, hydrothermal, air purity, and economic; and of the relative importance of each performance
requirement.
3.1.5 HVAC, n—the mechanical system(s) providing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning to a building.
3.1.6 offıce—offıce, n—a place, such as a room, suite, or building, in which business, clerical, or professional activities are
conducted. E631
3.1.7 monitor, n—a visual display for computer information.
3.1.7.1 Discussion—
Monitor has become common usage replacing the t
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...