ASTM E1660-95a(2018)
(Classification)Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Support for Office Work
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Support for Office Work
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office work.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Fig. 1 through Fig. 6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying
FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying (continued)
FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General
FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.1.3 for Training Rooms for Computer Skills
FIG. 3 Scale A.1.3 for Training Rooms for Computer Skills (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.1.4 for Interview Rooms
FIG. 4 Scale A.1.4 for Interview Rooms (continued)
FIG. 5 Scale A.1.5 for Storage and Floor Loading
FIG. 5 Scale A.1.5 for Storage and Floor Loading (continued)
FIG. 6 Scale A.1.6 for Shipping and Receiving
FIG. 6 Scale A.1.6 for Shipping and Receiving (continued)
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been plan...
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 28-Feb-2018
- Technical Committee
- E06 - Performance of Buildings
- Drafting Committee
- E06.25 - Whole Buildings and Facilities
Relations
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2015
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2014
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2013
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2012
- Effective Date
- 01-Jun-2006
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2005
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2005
- Effective Date
- 28-Jul-2000
- Effective Date
- 10-Oct-1999
- Effective Date
- 10-Oct-1999
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2018
Overview
ASTM E1660-95a(2018): Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Support for Office Work is a vital international standard developed by ASTM International. This classification provides a framework for estimating and comparing the serviceability of office facilities based on their capacity to support typical office work. Using a set of rating scales, this standard enables users to evaluate office buildings and identify how well a facility supports the specific needs of occupants. Importantly, it is applicable across a wide variety of office types, regardless of location, structure, age, or layout.
Key Topics
Facility Rating Scales: The standard introduces pairs of serviceability rating scales covering critical office facility topics. Each pair compares occupant requirements with facility features, offering users a method to gauge how closely a building matches expected levels of performance.
- Photocopying areas
- Training rooms (general and for computer skills)
- Interview rooms
- Storage and floor loading
- Shipping and receiving
Occupant Requirement Scales: Outlines the levels of serviceability required by various user groups within the office, such as employees, visitors, and management.
Quick and Economical Assessment: The classification aids in making approximate and rapid estimations of an office's ability to meet occupant needs, rather than providing a detailed technical evaluation.
Versatility: It can be used for existing buildings, planned new facilities, or in the context of facility remodeling projects.
Applications
ASTM E1660 is highly practical for a broad range of facility management, architectural, and planning activities:
Comparative Assessment: Allows facility managers and real estate professionals to compare serviceability levels across multiple office buildings, helping inform investment, leasing, or renovation decisions.
New Construction and Remodeling: Assists architects, planners, and project managers in evaluating whether planned or remodeled facilities are likely to meet the needs of intended occupant groups.
Change of Use Evaluation: Helps determine if an existing facility is suitable for alternative functions or groups beyond its current use, supporting effective space utilization.
Portfolio Benchmarking: Useful for organizations managing multiple sites to estimate and benchmark serviceability variance within their property portfolio.
Consistent, Objective Criteria: Enhances communication among stakeholders by providing a consistent, objective basis for discussing and documenting facility requirements and capabilities.
Note: This standard does not provide a precise measurement or evaluation of building performance and is not intended for use in regulatory, fire risk, or safety assessments. For technical evaluation or diagnosis, specialized expertise is required.
Related Standards
For comprehensive facility assessment and benchmarking, ASTM E1660 is frequently used in conjunction with other standards, including:
- ASTM E631: Terminology of Building Constructions - defines terms foundational to building performance discussions.
- ASTM E1334: Practice for Rating the Serviceability of a Building or Building-Related Facility (Withdrawn 2013) - offers guidance complementary to E1660.
- ASTM E1679: Practice for Setting the Requirements for the Serviceability of a Building or Building-Related Facility, and for Determining What Serviceability is Provided or Proposed.
- ASHRAE Standard 55: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy.
- ASHRAE Standard 62: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality.
- ISO 6240: Performance Standards in Building-Contents and Presentation.
Conclusion
ASTM E1660-95a(2018) provides essential classification tools for professionals involved in office facility management, design, and assessment. By establishing standardized serviceability criteria, this standard streamlines facility planning, benchmarking, and improvement initiatives, helping organizations ensure their office environments are functional, adaptable, and aligned with occupant requirements.
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard
BSI Group
BSI (British Standards Institution) is the business standards company that helps organizations make excellence a habit.
NYCE
Mexican standards and certification body.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM E1660-95a(2018) is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Support for Office Work". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility. 4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape. 4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities. 4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: 4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use. 4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built. 4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned. 4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements. 4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.) 4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment. SCOPE 1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office work. 1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Fig. 1 through Fig. 6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability. FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying (continued) FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying (continued) FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General (continued) FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General (continued) FIG. 3 Scale A.1.3 for Training Rooms for Computer Skills FIG. 3 Scale A.1.3 for Training Rooms for Computer Skills (continued) FIG. 4 Scale A.1.4 for Interview Rooms FIG. 4 Scale A.1.4 for Interview Rooms (continued) FIG. 5 Scale A.1.5 for Storage and Floor Loading FIG. 5 Scale A.1.5 for Storage and Floor Loading (continued) FIG. 6 Scale A.1.6 for Shipping and Receiving FIG. 6 Scale A.1.6 for Shipping and Receiving (continued) 1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing. 1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been plan...
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility. 4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape. 4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities. 4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: 4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use. 4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built. 4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned. 4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements. 4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.) 4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment. SCOPE 1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office work. 1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Fig. 1 through Fig. 6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability. FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying (continued) FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying (continued) FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General (continued) FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General (continued) FIG. 3 Scale A.1.3 for Training Rooms for Computer Skills FIG. 3 Scale A.1.3 for Training Rooms for Computer Skills (continued) FIG. 4 Scale A.1.4 for Interview Rooms FIG. 4 Scale A.1.4 for Interview Rooms (continued) FIG. 5 Scale A.1.5 for Storage and Floor Loading FIG. 5 Scale A.1.5 for Storage and Floor Loading (continued) FIG. 6 Scale A.1.6 for Shipping and Receiving FIG. 6 Scale A.1.6 for Shipping and Receiving (continued) 1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing. 1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been plan...
ASTM E1660-95a(2018) is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 35.260 - Office machines. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM E1660-95a(2018) has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM E1660-95a(2012), ASTM E631-15, ASTM E631-14, ASTM E1679-13, ASTM E1679-95(2012), ASTM E631-06, ASTM E1679-95(2005), ASTM E1334-95(2005), ASTM E631-93a(1998)e1, ASTM E1679-95(1999), ASTM E1334-95(1999), ASTM E1765-16(2023), ASTM E1700-16. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM E1660-95a(2018) is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation:E1660 −95a (Reapproved 2018)
Standard Classification for
Serviceability of an Office Facility for Support for Office
1,2
Work
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1660; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope serviceability score. That information is found in Practice
E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying
and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.
an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the
capability of an office facility to meet certain possible require- 1.6 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
ments for performance to support typical office work. standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
standard.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales,
1.6.1 Exception—Inch-pound units are used in Fig. 6.
shown in Fig. 1 through Fig. 6, are for classifying one topic of
1.7 This international standard was developed in accor-
serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) summarizes one level of
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require.
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
through Fig. 6) is a translation of the requirement into a
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
description of certain features of a facility which, taken in
combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that
2. Referenced Documents
level of required serviceability.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1
E631 Terminology of Building Constructions
through Fig. 6) are indicative and not comprehensive.They are
E1334 Practice for Rating the Serviceability of a Building or
for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and
Building-Related Facility (Withdrawn 2013)
economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the
E1679 Practice for Setting the Requirements for the Service-
needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The
ability of a Building or Building-Related Facility, and for
entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an
Determining What Serviceability is Provided or Proposed
office facility is performing.
2.2 ASHRAE Standards:
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of
ASHRAE Standard 55 Thermal Environmental Conditions
serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to
for Human Occupancy
estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned
ASHRAE Standard 62 Ventilation forAcceptable IndoorAir
but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings
Quality
and outline specifications have been prepared.
2.3 ISO Standard:
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility ISO 6240 International Standard, Performance Standards in
to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state
Building—Contents and Presentation
how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.25 Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
on Whole Buildings and Facilities. the ASTM website.
Current edition approved March 1, 2018. Published March 2018. Originally The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
approved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2012 as E1660 – 95a (2012). www.astm.org.
DOI: 10.1520/E1660-95AR18. Available from American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-
Portions of this document are based on material originally prepared by the Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (ASHRAE), 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA
International Centre for Facilities (ICF) and copyright 1993 by ICF and Minister of 30329, http://www.ashrae.org.
Public Works and Government Services Canada. Their cooperation in the develop- Available fromAmerican National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,
ment of this standard is acknowledged. 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E1660−95a (2018)
FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying
3. Terminology environment; or it may be a construction that is not a building.
The term encompasses both the physical object and its use.
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.2 facility serviceability—the capability of a facility to
3.1.1 facility—a physical setting used to serve a specific
purpose. E631 perform the function(s) for which it is designed, used, or
required to be used. E631
3.1.1.1 Discussion—A facility may be within a building, a
whole building, or a building with its site and surrounding 3.1.2.1 Discussion—The scope of this performance is of the
E1660−95a (2018)
FIG. 1Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying (continued)
facility as a system, including its subsystems, components and 3.1.4 For standard definitions of additional terms applicable
materials and their interactions, such as acoustical, to this classification, see Terminology E631.
hydrothermal, air purity, and economic; and of the relative
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
importance of each performance requirement.
3.2.1 convenience copiers—medium-size ph
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...