03.220.50 - Air transport
ICS 03.220.50 Details
Air transport
Luftverkehr
Transport aerien
Zračni transport
General Information
Frequently Asked Questions
ICS 03.220.50 is a classification code in the International Classification for Standards (ICS) system. It covers "Air transport". The ICS is a hierarchical classification system used to organize international, regional, and national standards, facilitating the search and identification of standards across different fields.
There are 66 standards classified under ICS 03.220.50 (Air transport). These standards are published by international and regional standardization bodies including ISO, IEC, CEN, CENELEC, and ETSI.
The International Classification for Standards (ICS) is a hierarchical classification system maintained by ISO to organize standards and related documents. It uses a three-level structure with field (2 digits), group (3 digits), and sub-group (2 digits) codes. The ICS helps users find standards by subject area and enables statistical analysis of standards development activities.
e-Library Subscription
Create subscription and get permanent access to documents within 03.220.50 - Air transport
Currently subscription includes documents marked with .We are working on making all documents available within the subscription.
The present document specifies technical characteristics and methods of measurements for ground based monostatic
ATC solid state primary surveillance radars that are intended to work with a waveguide-based rotating passive antenna
and have the following characteristics:
• operation in the 1 215 MHz to 1 400 MHz frequency range;
• transmitter output peak power up to 100 kW;
• the transceiver output uses an RF circulator;
• a piece of waveguide of at least 66 cm is integral to the transceiver.
NOTE 1: Phased array ATC primary surveillance radars are not covered by the present document.
NOTE 2: 66 cm equals 2 times the cut-off wavelength of a WR650/WG6/R14 waveguide which is typically used in
the 1 215 MHz to 1 400 MHz frequency range.
NOTE 3: The relationship between the present document and essential requirements of article 3.2 of
Directive 2014/53/EU [i.1] is given in Annex A.
- Standard45 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard45 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard45 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document specifies technical characteristics and methods of measurements for the following equipment
used in ground-based ATC Secondary Surveillance Radar systems for civil air navigation.
- Standard40 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard40 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard40 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document includes the sector specific requirements for the provision of private security services for airport and civil aviation security that are additional to the requirements of EN 17483-1:2021.
NOTE It is important that the selection of a private security service provider always represent the best balance between quality and price. This document sets out the minimum requirements that providers should comply with in order for this balance to be struck.
It specifies service requirements for quality in organization, processes, personnel and management of a security service provider and/or its independent branches and establishments under commercial law and trade as a provider with regard to airport and aviation security services.
It lays down quality criteria for the delivery of airport and aviation security services requested by public and private clients. This document is suitable for the selection, attribution, awarding and reviewing of the most suitable provider of airport and aviation security services [1].
- Standard15 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to the Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS)
Guidance Service. This service is based on the A-SMGCS surveillance service (as specified in ETSI EN 303 213-1 [3])
and generates individual guidance information for mobiles based on the surveillance and routing information and
known constraints (e.g. standard taxi routes, taxiway closures). In most cases these guidance information will be
provided to external partner systems of the A-SMGCS, such as the airfield ground lighting or electronic flight bag
display systems in the cockpit of the mobiles. The guidance information can be modified by the controller at any time.
The present document provides a European Standard for Air Navigation Service Providers, who have to demonstrate
and declare compliance of their systems and procedures to the Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 [i.3], and takes into account
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/116 [i.2].
A mapping of requirements for the A-SMGCS guidance service to the relevant Essential Requirements of Regulation
(EU) 2018/1139 [i.3] is provided in Annex A.
Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present
document. As such the essential requirements of the Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 [i.3] are not considered for software
elements within the present document.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental
constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination.
NOTE: For these ERs, refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures.
Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively
referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the
present document.
Currently there are no relevant Implementing Rules for A-SMGCS. The present document does not give presumption of
conformity to any current interoperability Implementing Rules.
- Standard23 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard23 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard23 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
SCOPE
1.1 This specification applies to uncrewed aircraft (UA) with a maximum dimension (for example, wingspan, disc diameter) ≤25 ft, operating at airspeeds below 100 kts, and of any configuration or category. It is meant to be applied in a “lower risk” [low- and medium-risk airspace as described by Joint Authorities for Rulemaking on Unmanned Systems (JARUS)] airspace environment with assumed infrequent encounters with crewed aircraft; this is typically in classes G and E airspace [below about 1200 ft above ground level (AGL)], Class B, C, D (below approximately 400 ft to 500 ft AGL) below obstacle clearance surface (FAA Order 8260.3, as amended) or within low altitude authorization and notification capability (LAANC) designated areas below the altitude specified in the facility map.
1.1.1 Traffic encountered is expected to be mixed cooperative and non-cooperative traffic, instrument flight rules (IFR) and visual flight rules (VFR), and to mostly include low-altitude aircraft—including rotorcraft, small general aviation, crop dusters, ultralights, and light sport aircraft, but not transport category aircraft.
1.1.2 This includes, but is not limited to, airspace where nearly all aircraft are required2 to be cooperative (for example, within the Mode C veil in the United States).
1.2 Ultimate determination of applicability will be governed by the appropriate civil aviation authority (CAA).
1.3 This specification assumes no air traffic control (ATC) separation services are provided to the UA.
1.4 While some architectures may have limitations due to external conditions, this specification applies to daytime and nighttime, as well as visual meteorological conditions (VMC) and instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). The system integrator shall document system limitation (that is, due to operating environments and/or minimum altitudes at which the air picture is no longer valid).
1.5 This specification is applicable to the avoidance of crewed aircraft by uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS), not UA-to-UA or terrain/obstacle/airspace avoidance (both to be addressed in future efforts). Likewise, birds or natural hazard (for example, weather, clouds) avoidance requirements are not addressed.
1.6 This specification does not define a specific detect and avoid (DAA) architecture3 and is architecture agnostic. It will, however, define specific safety performance thresholds for a DAA system to meet in order to ensure safe operation.
1.7 This specification addresses the definitions and methods for demonstrating compliance to this specification, and the many considerations (for example, detection range, required timeline to meet well clear, and near mid-air collision (NMAC) safety targets) affecting DAA system integration.
1.8 The specification highlights how different aspects of the system are designed and interrelated, and how they affect the greater UAS system-of-systems to enable a developer to make informed decisions within the context of their specific UAS application(s).
1.9 It is expected this specification will be used by diverse contributors or actors including, but not limited to:
1.9.1 DAA system designers and integrators,
1.9.2 Sensor suppliers,
1.9.3 UA developers,
1.9.4 Control Station designers,
1.9.5 UAS service suppliers, and
1.9.6 Flight control designers.
1.10 Except for DAA system integrators for whom all the “shalls” in this specification apply, not all aspects of this specification are relevant to all actors/contributors. In some instances, the actor most likely to satisfy a requirement has been identified in brackets after the requirement; this is for informative purposes only and does not indicate that only that actor may fulfill that requirement. Where not specified, the system integrator/applicant is assumed to be the primary actor; in all cases, the system integrator/applicant is responsible for all requirements and may choose to delegate requirements as ...
- Technical specification29 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Technical specification29 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document provides means of compliance with the “Direct Remote Identification” requirements set
in Regulation (EU) 2019/945 on Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
“Direct remote identification” means a system that ensures the local broadcast of information about a
UA in operation.
More specifically, this document addresses drone’s capability to be identified during the whole duration
of the flight, in real time and with no specific connectivity or ground infrastructure link, by existing
mobile devices when within the broadcasting range. Such functionality, based on an open and
documented transmission protocol (described in this document) contributes to address security threats
and to support drones’ operators’ obligations with respect to citizens’ fundamental rights to privacy
and protection of personal data. It can be used by law enforcement people, critical infrastructure
managers, and public to get an instantaneous information on the drone flying around, providing various
information such as UA serial number, UA navigation data and operational status, UAS Operator
registration number and position as defined in the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945.
Since Regulation (EU) 2019/945 requires DRI information to be broadcasted using an “open and
documented protocol”, this document does not define technological measures to protect the
confidentiality and integrity of the data broadcasted.
- Standard64 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
SCOPE
1.1 This specification covers the performance requirements for remote identification (Remote ID) of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). Remote ID allows governmental and civil identification of UAS for safety, security, and compliance purposes. The objective is to increase UAS remote pilot accountability by removing anonymity while preserving operational privacy for remote pilots, businesses, and their customers. Remote ID is an enabler of enhanced operations such as beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) operations as well as operations over people.
1.2 This specification defines message formats, transmission methods, and minimum performance standards for two forms of Remote ID: broadcast and network. Broadcast Remote ID is based on the transmission of radio signals directly from a UAS to receivers in the UAS’s vicinity. Network Remote ID is based on communication by means of the internet from a network Remote ID service provider (Net-RID SP) that interfaces directly or indirectly with the UAS, or with other sources in the case of intent-based network participants.
1.3 This specification addresses the communications and test requirements of broadcast or network Remote ID, or both, in UAS and Net-RID SP systems.
1.4 Applicability:
1.4.1 This specification is applicable to UAS that operate at very low level (VLL) airspace over diverse environments including but not limited to rural, urban, networked, network degraded, and network denied environments, regardless of airspace class.
1.4.2 This specification neither purports to address UAS operating with approval to use ADS-B or secondary surveillance radar transponders, nor does it purport to solve ID needs of UAS for all operations.
1.4.3 In particular, this specification does not purport to address identification needs for UAS that are not participating in Remote ID or operators that purposefully circumvent Remote ID.
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses after SI units are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.5.1 Units of measurement included in this specification:
m
meters
deg, °
degrees of latitude and longitude, compass direction
s
seconds
Hz
Hertz (frequency)
dBm
decibel-milliwatts (radio frequency power)
ppm
parts per million (radio frequency variation)
μs
microseconds
ms
milliseconds
1.6 Table of Contents:
Title
Section
Scope
1
Referenced Documents
2
Terminology
3
Remote ID and Network Interoperability Conceptual Overview
4
Performance Requirements
5
TEST METHODS
Scope
6
Significance and Use
7
Hazards
8
Test Units
9
Procedure
10
Precision and Bias
11
Product Marking
12
Packaging and Package Marking
13
Keywords
14
ANNEX A1—Broadcast Authentication Verifier Service
Annex A1
ANNEX A2—Network Remote ID Interoperability Requirements, APIs, and Testing
Annex A2
ANNEX A3—Tables of Values
Annex A3
ANNEX A4—USS-DSS and USS-USS OpenAPI YAML Description
Annex A4
ANNEX A5—Number Registrar Management Policy
Annex A5
APPENDIX X1—Performance Characteristics
Appendix X1
APPENDIX X2—List of Subcommittee Participants and Contributors
Appendix X2
APPENDIX X3—Background Information
Appendix X3
1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Some specific hazards statements are given in Section 8 on Hazards.
1.8 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the D...
- Technical specification48 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 The general approach to this practice is to serve as an “overlay” of requirements to the ASTM F3411-22a Standard Specification for Remote ID and Tracking by identifying mandatory portions, substituting values as needed, overriding items that may be optional, and providing additional requirements that are beyond the scope of Specification F3411, yet are necessary to provide proper guidance to meet the requirements set forth in Part 89.
3.2 Furthermore, this practice provides additional details on minimal testing requirements for those submitting a DOC based on this MOC.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice provides a Means of Compliance (MOC) that gives sufficient clarity to the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) or Broadcast Module manufacturers to produce a compliant Remote ID (RID) System (RIDS) such that submitting a Declaration of Compliance2 (DOC) to this MOC will satisfy the requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 14 CFR Part 89 (Part 89) rule.3 This practice also explains what to expect from aircraft operating in compliance to this MOC.
1.2 The FAA provided three options to comply with the Remote ID regulations: Standard Remote ID UAS, Remote ID Broadcast Modules, and FAA-recognized identification areas (FRIAs). The scope of this MOC is to cover both Standard RID and RID Broadcast Modules.
1.3 The FRIA portion of the rule is out of scope since it provides a means to avoid the technical RID requirements by operating within administrative boundaries.
1.4 Both SI and non-SI units are used in this document. Since this is an aviation standard and it addresses FAA rules, some units are used in preference of being consistent with industry and regulatory norms.
1.5 Table of Contents:
Title
Section
Scope
1
Referenced Documents
2
Significance and Use
3
Subset of Options in the F3411 Specification Considered
4
Requirements and Exceptions from the F3411 Specification
5
Alternative Applications of Specification F3411 to Meet Part 89
Requirements
6
MOC Requirements Not Covered by the Practice
7
Test Methods
8
Precision and Bias
9
Satisfaction of Rule Requirements
10
Keywords
11
ANNEX A1—Simulation Option for Accuracy Testing
Annex A1
APPENDIX X1—External Device for GCS Location Source Rationale
Appendix X1
APPENDIX X2—Power Level Rationale
Appendix X2
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
- Standard19 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
The present document specifies technical characteristics and methods of measurements for the following equipment
used in ground-based ATC Secondary Surveillance Radar systems for civil air navigation.
Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR) with Mode S capabilities which includes mode A/C, transmitting in the
1 030 MHz band with a power not exceeding 4 kW (66 dBm), and receiving in the 1 090 MHz band, used for air traffic
control and connected to a rotating antenna. The SSR Interrogator transmits interrogations to aircraft equipped with
transponder, receives the corresponding replies, and operates in the frequency bands as indicated in Table 1.
- Standard44 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard45 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard45 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard45 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document specifies technical characteristics and methods of measurements for ground based monostatic
ATC primary surveillance radars with the following characteristics:
• operating in the 2 700 MHz to 3 100 MHz frequency range;
• transmitter output peak power up to 100 kW;
• the transceiver-antenna connection uses a hollow metallic rectangular waveguide of type WR284/WG10/R32
according to IEC 60153-2 [i.6] with a minimum length between the output of the power amplifier and the
input to the antenna of 2,886 m (20 times the wavelength of the waveguide cut-off frequency);
• the antenna rotates, is waveguide-based and passive;
• the transceiver output uses a RF circulator.
NOTE 1: Phased array ATC primary surveillance radars are not covered by the present document.
NOTE 2: The relationship between the present document and essential requirements of article 3.2 of Directive
2014/53/EU [i.1] is given in annex A.
- Standard38 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard38 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard38 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Demonstration plans developed in accordance with this practice will include all necessary content and key considerations to support an effective flight demonstration program aimed at approval or certification of UAS by the FAA through D&R demonstration.
4.2 This practice does not address planning requirements for UAS development testing. It is assumed that a manufacturer has completed all UAS design and development and is preparing demonstration programs to support compliance demonstration on a stable and controlled system configuration. Manufacturers who wish to prepare a detailed design and development program should review Specification F3298 for programmatic examples.
4.3 This practice is intended to be used on low-risk UAS that meet the following design criteria and operating limitations.
4.3.1 The UAS has a command and control link that enables the pilot-in-command to take contingency action.
4.3.2 The unmanned aircraft (UA) has a kinetic energy of ≤25 000 ft-lb calculated in accordance with methods specified within the MOC.
4.3.3 The UA is operated ≤400 ft above ground level (AGL).
4.3.4 No operations over open-air assemblies (operations over people are acceptable).
4.3.5 No flight into known icing.
4.3.6 Maximum of 20:1 aircraft to pilot ratio.
4.3.7 The UA is electrically powered (excludes internal combustion engines and fuel cells).
SCOPE
1.1 This standard practice is intended for low-risk UAS seeking type certification by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under 14 CFR Part 21.17(b) in accordance with the FAA durability and reliability (D&R) means of compliance (MOC). The definition of “low-risk UAS” does not necessarily align with other definitions found within corresponding ASTM standards (F3442/F3442M) or other UAS-related standards. For the purposes of this practice, “low-risk” is defined as a UAS operated in accordance with the concept of operations (CONOPs), eligibility criteria, and kinetic energy threshold specified in the G-1 Issue Paper (which will be provided to the applicant by the FAA). See 4.3 for design criteria and operating limitations for low-risk UAS.
1.2 This standard practice establishes a common methodology and key considerations for the development of minimum flight plans for low-risk UAS that demonstrate aircraft reliability as part of a D&R MOC.
1.3 The scope of this standard practice encompasses D&R planning, data collection, and reporting.
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. This is not intended to limit the systems of units used for design, development testing, or demonstration testing. However, the units of measurement used on pilot-facing placards and markings and manuals must be the same as those used on the corresponding equipment with recognition that international aviation utilizes feet for altitude and knots for airspeed as operational parameters.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
- Standard22 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
The present document is applicable to deployed non-cooperative sensor as a constituent of an Advanced Surface
Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS).
The present document provides a European Standard for manufacturers, Air Navigation Service Providers and/or
Airport Operators, who have to demonstrate and declare compliance of their systems and constituents to the Essential
Requirements (ERs) of Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 [i.7].
NOTE 1: The ERs in Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 [i.7] covered by the present document are outlined
in Table A.1.
NOTE 2: Although the ERs of the SES Interoperability Regulation [i.1] have been repealed with effect from
11 September 2018 [i.7], a mapping of the requirements for the A-SMGCS Surveillance Service to this
same regulation [i.1] is provided in Annex B.
Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are out of scope of the present
document. As such the ERs of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 [i.7] are not considered for software elements within the
present document.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental
constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination.
NOTE 3: For these ERs, the Air Navigation Service Provider will need to provide supplementary compliance
within their Interoperability Technical Files.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity to any current interoperability Implementing Rules
(IRs).
NOTE 4: Currently there are no relevant Implementing Rules for A-SMGCS.
Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively
referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the
present document if they are unambiguously referred to from the present document.
The reference to particular requirements is done either by citing the unambiguous requirement number or range of
numbers (e.g. "[REQ 30.] to [REQ 35.]") or, if no requirement numbers are available, by indicating the paragraph and
clause of the reference material where the requirement can be found.
NOTE 5: Other requirements and other EU Regulations and/or Directives may be applicable to the product(s)
falling within the scope of the present document.
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to deployed non-cooperative SMR sensor as a constituent of an Advanced Surface
Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS).
NOTE 1: Generic requirements for a non-cooperative sensor are defined in ETSI EN 303 213-4-1 [1].
The present document provides a European Standard for manufacturers, Air Navigation Service Providers and/or
Airport Operators, who have to demonstrate and declare compliance of their systems and constituents to the Essential
Requirements (ERs) of Annex VIII of Regulation EU 2018/1139 [i.6].
NOTE 2: The ERs in Annex VIII of Regulation EU 2018/1139 [i.6] covered by the present document are outlined
in Table A.1.
NOTE 3: Although the ERs of the SES Interoperability Regulation [i.1] have been repealed with effect from
11 September 2018 [i.6], a mapping of the requirements for the A-SMGCS Surveillance Service to this
same regulation [i.1] is provided in Annex B.
Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are out of scope of the present
document. As such the ERs of Regulation EU 2018/1139 [i.6] are not considered for software elements within the
present document.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental
constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination.
NOTE 4: For these ERs, the Air Navigation Service Provider will need to provide supplementary compliance
within their Interoperability Technical Files.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity to any current interoperability Implementing Rules
(IRs).
NOTE 5: Currently there are no relevant Implementing Rules for A-SMGCS.
Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively
referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the
present document if they are unambiguously referred to from the present document.
The reference to particular requirements is done either by citing the unambiguous requirement number or range of
numbers (e.g. "[REQ 30.] to [REQ 35.]") or, if no requirement numbers are available, by indicating the paragraph and
clause of the reference material where the requirement can be found.
NOTE 6: Other requirements and other EU Regulations and/or Directives may be applicable to the product(s)
falling within the scope of the present document.
- Standard34 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard34 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard34 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS)
Surveillance Service. This system provides enhanced surveillance functionalities, as well as a display to controllers with
accurate and unambiguous identity and position information on the entire manoeuvring and movement area of
aerodromes.
The present document provides a European Standard for manufacturers, Air Navigation Service Providers and/or
Airport Operators, who have to demonstrate and declare compliance of their systems and constituents to the Essential
Requirements (ERs) of Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) No 2018/1139 [i.1].
NOTE 1: The ERs in Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) No 2018/1139 [i.5] covered by the present document are
outlined in Table A.1.
NOTE 2: Although the ERs of the SES Interoperability Regulation [i.1] have been repealed with effect from
11 September 2018 [i.5], a mapping of the requirements for a deployed cooperative sensor including its
interfaces to this same regulation [i.1] is provided in Annex B.
Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are out of scope of the present
document. As such the ERs of Regulation EU 2018/1139 [i.5] are not considered for software elements within the
present document.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, constraints,
procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination.
NOTE 3: For these ERs, the Air Navigation Service Provider will need to provide supplementary compliance
within their Interoperability Technical Files.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity to any current interoperability Implementing Rules
(IRs).
NOTE 4: Currently there are no relevant Implementing Rules for A-SMGCS.
Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively
referenced material (clause 2.1) are only to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance
with the present document if they are unambiguously referred to from the present document.
The reference to particular requirements is done either by citing the unambiguous requirement number or range of
numbers (e.g. "[REQ 30.] to [REQ 35.]") or, if no requirement numbers are available, by indicating the paragraph and
clause of the reference material where the requirement can be found.
NOTE 5: Other requirements and other EU Regulations and/or Directives may be applicable to the product(s)
falling within the scope of the present document.
- Standard37 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard46 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard46 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard46 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
REN/ERM-TGAERO-37-1
- Standard44 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard44 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard44 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to the Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS)
airport safety support service. This service is based on the A-SMGCS surveillance service (as specified in ETSI
EN 303 213-1 [3]) and provides safety net functionalities to controllers with timely, accurate and unambiguous
information and alerts covering the entire manoeuvring and movement area of aerodromes.
The present document provides a European Standard for manufacturers, Air Navigation Service Providers and/or
Airport Operators, who have to demonstrate and declare compliance of their systems and constituents to the Essential
Requirements (ERs) of Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 [i.4].
NOTE 1: The ERs in Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 [i.4] covered by the present document are outlined
in Table A.1.
NOTE 2: Although the ERs of the SES Interoperability Regulation [i.1] have been repealed with effect from
11 September 2018 [i.4], a mapping of the requirements for the A-SMGCS Surveillance Service to this
same regulation [i.1] is provided in Annex B.
Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present
document. As such the ERs of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 [i.4] are not considered for software elements within the
present document.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental
constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination.
NOTE 3: For these ERs, the Air Navigation Service Provider will need to provide supplementary compliance
within their Interoperability Technical Files.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity to any current interoperability Implementing Rules
(IRs).
NOTE 4: Currently there are no relevant Implementing Rules for A-SMGCS.
Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively
referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the
present document if they are unambiguously referred to from the present document.
The reference to particular requirements is done either by citing the unambiguous requirement number or range of
numbers (e.g. "[REQ 30.] to [REQ 35.]") or, if no requirement numbers are available, by indicating the paragraph and
chapter of the reference material where the requirement can be found.
NOTE 5: Other requirements and other EU Regulations and/or Directives may be applicable to the product(s)
falling within the scope of the present document.
- Standard40 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard39 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard39 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to the Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS)
Routing Service. This service is based on the A-SMGCS surveillance service as specified in ETSI EN 303 213-1 [3]
and generates individual routes for mobiles based on the trajectory start and end points and known constraints (e.g.
standard taxi routes, taxiway closures). In most cases these trajectory points for aircraft are the assigned runway holding
point and parking stand, or for vehicles, two positions on the movement area. Routes can be created or modified by the
Controller at any time.
The present document provides a European Standard for manufacturers, Air Navigation Service Providers and/or
Airport Operators, who have to demonstrate and declare compliance of their systems and constituents to the Essential
Requirements (ERs) of Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) No 2018/1139 [i.4].
NOTE 1: The ERs in Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) No 2018/1139 [i.4] covered by the present document are
outlined in Table A.1.
NOTE 2: Although the ERs of the SES Interoperability Regulation [i.1] have been repealed with effect from
11 September 2018 [i.4], a mapping of the requirements for the A-SMGCS Surveillance Service to this
same regulation [i.1] is provided in Annex B.
Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present
document. As such the ERs of Regulation (EU) No 2018/1139 [i.4] are not considered for software elements within the
present document.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental
constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination.
NOTE 3: For these ERs, the Air Navigation Service Provider will need to provide supplementary compliance
within their Interoperability Technical Files.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity to any current interoperability Implementing Rules
(IRs).
NOTE 4: Currently there are no relevant Implementing Rules for A-SMGCS.
Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively
referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the
present document if they are unambiguously referred to from the present document.
The reference to particular requirements is done either by citing the unambiguous requirement number or range of
numbers (e.g. "[REQ 30.] to [REQ 35.]") or, if no requirement numbers are available, by indicating the paragraph and
clause of the reference material where the requirement can be found.
NOTE 5: Other requirements and other EU Regulations and/or Directives may be applicable to the product(s)
falling within the scope of the present document.
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 The guide is intended to be used to assess competencies of qualified individuals who wish to become certified as an FHSS technician through a certification program.
4.2 The guide is intended to be used in concert with a certification provider’s structure and materials for management, exam delivery, and candidate preparation.
SCOPE
1.1 The purpose of this guide is to address the basic fundamental subject knowledge activities and functions for avionics professionals to be titled Flight Hazard and Surveillance Systems (FHSS) Technicians.
1.2 This guide does not cover weather detection and avoidance systems. These systems will be addressed in a future Aircraft Electronics Technician (AET) endorsement standard.
1.3 This guide is the basis for the FHSS certification, an endorsement to the AET certification. Candidates must be a certified AET to take the certification exam associated with this guide.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
- Guide5 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
The present document specifies technical characteristics and methods of measurements for the following equipment:
1) Interrogators transmitting in the 1 030 MHz band, used in Mode S multilateration equipment in an Advanced
Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS).
2) Receivers, receiving in the 1 090 MHz band, used in Mode S multilateration equipment in an Advanced
Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS).
Antennas for this equipment are external and passive without an additional amplifier.
The present document does not apply to equipment which includes a transponder function, to ground vehicle locators
and to reference transmitters which do not contain receivers for the purpose of replying to interrogation.
NOTE: The relationship between the present document and essential requirements of article 3.2 of
Directive 2014/53/EU [i.1] is given in Annex A.
- Standard32 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard33 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard32 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
- Standard32 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document provides guidance based on EN ISO/IEC 27002:2017 applied to organisations supporting civil aviation, with a focus on air traffic management operations.
This includes, but is not limited to, airspace users, airports and air navigation service providers.
Not included are activities of the organisations that do not have any impact on the security of civil aviation operations like for example airport retail and service business and corporate real estate management.
The basis of all guidance in this document is trust and cooperation between the parties involved in Air Traffic Management.
- Standard65 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document specifies technical characteristics and methods of measurements for monostatic X-band radar
sensors intended for the surveillance of airspace traffic with the following characteristics:
• Operating in the frequency range 8 500 MHz to 10 000 MHz utilizing modulated pulses.
• The transceiver-antenna connection is using a hollow metallic rectangular waveguide.
• The antenna is rotating, waveguide-based and passive.
• At the transceiver output an RF-circulator is used.
NOTE 1: Since transceiver and antenna are hollow metallic rectangular waveguide based the frequency range for
measurements that needs to be addressed covers 6,56 GHz to 26 GHz. The lower limit of this frequency
range is obtained as cut-off frequency of the combination of WR112/R84 taper section and a WR90/R100
Waveguide IEC 60153-2 [i.3]. The upper limit corresponds to the upper limit stated in Table 1 of ERC
Recommendation 74-01 [2].
NOTE 2: Since at the transceiver output an RF circulator is used, it is assumed that the transceiver characteristics
remain independent from the antenna.
NOTE 3: Multi-static radars are not covered by the present document.
NOTE 4: The relationship between the present document and essential requirements of article 3.2 of Directive
2014/53/EU [i.1] is given in annex A.
- Standard29 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard29 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard29 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document specifies technical characteristics and methods of measurements for monostatic X-band radar
sensors intended for the surveillance of airport surface movement traffic with the following characteristics:
• Operating in one or both of the following frequency ranges:
- 9 000 MHz to 9 200 MHz and 9 300 MHz to 9 500 MHz utilizing modulated or unmodulated pulses.
• Transmitter Peak Envelope Power up to 100 kW.
• The transceiver-antenna connection is using a hollow metallic rectangular waveguide.
• The antenna is rotating, waveguide-based and passive.
• At the transceiver output an RF-circulator is used.
NOTE 1: Since transceiver and antenna are hollow metallic rectangular waveguide based the frequency range for
measurements that needs to be addressed covers 6,56 GHz to 26 GHz. The lower limit of this frequency
range is obtained as cut-off frequency of the combination of WR112/R84 taper section and a WR90/R100
Waveguide IEC 60153-2 [i.3]. The upper limit corresponds to the upper limit stated in table 1 of ERC
Recommendation 74-01 [2].
NOTE 2: Since at the transceiver output an RF circulator is used, it is assumed that the transceiver characteristics
remain independent from the antenna.
NOTE 3: Aeronautical Surface Movement Radars covered by the present document are expected to use the bands
9 000 MHz to 9 200 MHz and/or 9 300 MHz to 9 500 MHz. According article 5 of the ITU Radio
Regulations [3] the band 9 000 MHz to 9 200 MHz is allocated to the Aeronautical Radionavigation
Service on a primary basis and the band 9 300 MHz to 9 500 MHz is allocated to the Radionavigation
Service on a primary basis.
NOTE 4: The relationship between the present document and essential requirements of article 3.2 of Directive
2014/53/EU [i.1] is given in annex A.
- Standard31 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document provides guidance based on EN ISO/IEC 27002:2017 applied to organisations supporting civil aviation, with a focus on air traffic management operations.
This includes, but is not limited to, airspace users, airports and air navigation service providers.
Not included are activities of the organisations that do not have any impact on the security of civil aviation operations like for example airport retail and service business and corporate real estate management.
The basis of all guidance in this document is trust and cooperation between the parties involved in Air Traffic Management.
- Standard65 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 The guide is intended to be used to assess competencies of qualified individuals who wish to become certified as an Aircraft Electronics Technician through a certification program.
4.2 The guide is intended to be used in concert with a certification provider’s structure and materials for management, exam delivery, and candidate preparation.
SCOPE
1.1 The purpose of this guide is to address the basic fundamental subject knowledge, task performance, and task knowledge activities and functions for avionics professionals to be titled Aircraft Electronics Technicians (AETs).
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
- Guide7 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Guide7 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 While many of the reasons for needing the signals contained in this practice have been overcome by technology development, situations still arise where voice communications cannot be established between aircraft and persons on the ground during emergencies. This is particularly true of persons in distress, who typically have no communications equipment. These signals continue to meet the need for communications.
3.2 Most of these signals have been adopted by international convention, the others by civilian and military agencies of the United States Government. The signals described in this practice are intended for use on land and can be made without special equipment such as flares or colored panels. Other signaling systems are described in the National Search and Rescue (SAR) Manual.3
3.3 The signals are also useful in situations where either complete or partial voice communications exist. Where only partial capabilities exist, for example, a ground unit with receive-only capability, the aircrew can transmit voice and the ground crew can respond with the appropriate signal.
3.3.1 The signals described in Section 4, by their nature, are not intended for real-time communications with aircraft. They can be left unattended as messages for aircrews. Persons on the ground (SAR or otherwise) can make a signal and continue on without contact with the aircraft. The SAR personnel should keep this in mind when encountering the signals of Fig. 1.
FIG. 1 Ground-to-Air Signals
3.4 Search and rescue agencies utilizing this practice should disseminate these signals to the public as part of their preventative search and rescue (PSAR) efforts. The signals have changed over the years and a number of publications contain obsolete signals.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers the signals to be used between persons on the ground and in aircraft when two-way voice communications cannot be established during ground emergencies. Ground signals are limited to land-based ones that do not require special equipment. Flare, light, panel, and maritime signals are specifically excluded.
1.2 The signals are divided into two categories: those used by persons on the ground and those used by aircraft.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
- Standard3 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Aircraft flying in national airspace are required by the ICAO Chicago Convention and national regulatory rules to have visible markings to determine nationality and registration. UAS shall comply with these rules, although small UAS will have unique rules or exemptions from existing rules due to their small size. This standard is designed to allow UAS to comply with these marking requirements in Annex 7 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation as amended by state regulatory rules.
4.2 Many ICAO states are assigning UAS to different classes and categories to define the rules UAS must operate under. The ICAO Annex 7 Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPS) apply to UAS Aircraft with the exception of small UAS. The classification of what constitutes a small UAS (sUAS) has been left to ICAO states and the rules under which sUAS operate are dictated by each state.
4.3 This practice follows ICAO Annex 7 SARPS except in areas where the unique aspects of UAS may not allow compliance. In these cases, this document will address the issue and recommend the need for an alternate compliance method.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice prescribes guidelines for the display of marks to indicate appropriate UAS registration and ownership for all Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) except those categorized as small UAS (sUAS) by regulatory authorities. The FAA is developing a Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) to define the term small UAS and provide regulations for these aircraft.
1.2 This practice will allow determination of nationality in cases where UAS may cross international boundaries.
1.3 This practice does not apply to sUAS. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has left the designation of sUAS to each state and the states will develop rules and regulations for sUAS.
1.4 This practice does not apply to model aircraft.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
- Standard3 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
The present document is applicable to Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS)
Level 1. This system provides enhanced surveillance functionalities, as well as a display to controllers with accurate and
unambiguous identity and position information on the entire manoeuvring and movement area.
The present document provides a European Standard for Air Navigation Service Providers, which have to demonstrate
and declare compliance of their systems and procedures to the IOP regulation.
Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present
document. As such the essential requirements of the Interoperability Regulation are not considered for software
elements within the present document.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental
constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination.
NOTE 1: For these ERs, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures.
Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively
referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the
present document.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity to any current interoperability Implementing Rules.
NOTE 2: Currently there are no relevant Implementing Rules for A-SMGCS.
- Standard38 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard37 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard37 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems (A-SMGCS)
Level 2. This system provides enhanced surveillance functionalities such as advanced monitoring and alerting
functions.
The present document provides a European Standard for Air Navigation Service Providers, who need to demonstrate
and declare compliance of their systems and procedures to the IOP Regulation.
Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present
document. As such the essential requirements of the Interoperability Regulation are not considered for software
elements within the present document.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental
constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination.
NOTE 1: For these ERs, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures.
NOTE 2: For those parts of the essential requirements, where annexes A and SA give no presumption of
conformity, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures.
Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively
referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the
present document.
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document applies to X-band radar sensors intended for the surveillance of airport surface movement traffic
with the following characteristics:
• Operating in one or both of the following frequency ranges:
- 9 000 MHz to 9 200 MHz and 9 300 MHz to 9 500 MHz utilizing modulated or unmodulated pulses.
• Transmitter Peak Envelope Power up to 100 kW.
• The transceiver-antenna connection is using a hollow metallic rectangular waveguide.
• The antenna is rotating, waveguide-based and passive.
• At the transceiver output an RF-circulator is used.
NOTE 1: Since transceiver and antenna are hollow metallic rectangular waveguide based the frequency range for
measurements that needs to be addressed covers 6,56 GHz to 26 GHz. The lower limit of this frequency
range is obtained as cut-off frequency of the combination of WR112/R84 taper section and a WR90/R100
Waveguide IEC 60153-2 [i.3]. The upper limit corresponds to the upper limit stated in
ERC/Recommendation 74-01 [i.5].
NOTE 2: Since at the transceiver output an RF circulator is used, it is assumed that the transceiver characteristics
remain independent from the antenna.
NOTE 3: Aeronautical Surface Movement Radars covered by the present document are expected to use the bands
9 000 MHz to 9 200 MHz and/or 9 300 MHz to 9 500 MHz. According article 5 of the ITU Radio
Regulations [i.6] the band 9 000 MHz to 9 200 MHz is allocated to the Aeronautical Radionavigation
Service on a primary basis and the band 9 300 MHz to 9 500 MHz is allocated to the Radionavigation
Service on a primary basis.
The present document contains requirements to demonstrate that "... Radio equipment shall be so constructed that it
both effectively uses and supports the efficient use of radio spectrum in order to avoid harmful interference" [i.1].
In addition to the present document, other ENs that specify technical requirements in respect of essential requirements
under other parts of article 3 of the Radio Equipment Directive 2014/53/EU [i.1] as well as essential requirements under
the SES Interoperability Regulation 552/2004 [i.9] and related implementing rules and/or essential requirements under
the EASA basic regulation 216/2008 [i.12] may apply to equipment within the scope of the present document.
- Standard24 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard24 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard24 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard24 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This guide provides minimum guidance for the development of air medical training programs.
4.2 This guide identifies additional subject areas of training necessary to become an air medical patient care provider.
SCOPE
1.1 This guide applies to patient care providers onboard medical flights involved in the provision of patient care during air medical transport. It does not necessarily address the qualifications and training of additional specialty care providers or other allied health professionals during air medical transport.
1.2 This guide establishes air medical nomenclature.
1.3 This guide establishes minimum qualifications and training requirements for the air medical patient care provider(s) and the air medical director.
1.4 This guide identifies the general content of the curricula for air medical training.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
- Guide2 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
The present document applies to X-band radar sensors intended for the surveillance of airport surface movement traffic with the following characteristics:
- Utilizing modulated or unmodulated pulses.
- Transmitter Peak Envelope Power up to 100 kW.
- The transceiver-antenna connection is using a hollow metallic rectangular waveguide.
- The antenna is rotating, waveguide- based and passive.
- At the transceiver output an RF-circulator is used.
The present document covers only the essential requirements of article 3.2 of the R&TTE Directive [i.1]. NOTE 1: Since transceiver and antenna are hollow metallic rectangular waveguide based the frequency range for measurements that needs to be addressed covers 6,56 GHz to 26 GHz The lower limit of this frequency range is obtained as cut-off frequency of the combination of WR112/R84 taper section and a WR90/R100 Waveguide IEC 60153-2 [i.3]. The upper limit corresponds to the upper limit stated in ERC/Recommendation 74-01 [i.5]. NOTE 2: Since at the transceiver output an RF circulator is used, it is assumed that the transceiver characteristics
remain independent from the antenna. NOTE 3: According Article 5 of the ITU Radio Regulations [i.6] the band 9 000 MHz to 9 200 MHz is allocated to the Aeronautical Radionavigation Service on a primary basis and the band 9 300 MHz to 9 500 MHz is allocated to the Aeronautical Radionavigation Service on a secondary basis.
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This Technical Specification specifies the technical, operational and maintenance requirements for Software Assurance Levels to support the demonstration of compliance with some elements of the Essential Requirements Safety and Principles governing the construction of systems of the Regulation (EC 552/2004) of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic network (the Interoperability regulation).
This Technical Specification on Software Assurance Levels (SWAL) is intended to apply to software that is part of the EATMN, focusing only on its ground segment and providing a reference against which stakeholders can assess their own practices for software specification, design, development, operation, maintenance, evolution and decommissioning.
Requirements in the present document which refer to should statements or recommendations in the normatively referenced material are to be interpreted as fully normative (shall) for the purpose of compliance with the present document.
- Technical specification9 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems (A-SMGCS) Level 2. This system provides enhanced surveillance functionalities such as advanced monitoring and alerting functions. The present document provides a European Standard for Air Navigation Service Providers, who have to demonstrate and declare compliance of their systems and procedures to the IOP Regulation. Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present document. As such the essential requirements of the Interoperability Regulation are not considered for software elements within the present document. The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination.
NOTE 1: For these ERs, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures.
NOTE 2: For those parts of the essential requirements, where annexes A and SA give no presumption of conformity, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the present document.
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
Scope of work to be undertaken: Update the European Standard for A-SMGCS System Level 1 considering updated Reference material from EUROCONTORL, new ETSI drafting rules and editorial changes. Other regulations have to be considered.
- Standard38 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard38 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard38 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
incorporation of first feedback from practical application of V1.1.1 of EN 303 214 and other developments (e.g. availability of EASA SC and CRI for DL-onboard installations)
- Standard163 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard163 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard163 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
Scope of work to be undertaken: Update the European Standard for A-SMGCS System Level 2 considering updated Reference material from EUROCONTORL, new ETSI drafting rules and editorial changes.Other regulations have to be considered.
- Standard37 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document applies to X-band radar sensors intended for the surveillance of airport surface movement traffic with the following characteristics:
Utilizing modulated or unmodulated pulses.
Transmitter Peak Envelope Power up to 100 kW.
The transceiver-antenna connection is using a hollow metallic rectangular waveguide.
The antenna is rotating, waveguide- based and passive.
At the transceiver output an RF-circulator is used.
The present document covers only the essential requirements of article 3.2 of the R&TTE Directive [i.1].
NOTE 1: Since transceiver and antenna are hollow metallic rectangular waveguide based the frequency range for measurements that needs to be addressed covers 6,56 GHz to 26 GHz The lower limit of this frequency range is obtained as cut-off frequency of the combination of WR112/R84 taper section and a WR90/R100 Waveguide IEC 60153-2 [i.3]. The upper limit corresponds to the upper limit stated in ERC/Recommendation 74-01 [i.5].
NOTE 2: Since at the transceiver output an RF circulator is used, it is assumed that the transceiver characteristics remain independent from the antenna.
NOTE 3: According Article 5 of the ITU Radio Regulations [i.6] the band 9 000 MHz to 9 200 MHz is allocated to the Aeronautical Radionavigation Service on a primary basis and the band 9 300 MHz to 9 500 MHz is allocated to the Aeronautical Radionavigation Service on a secondary basis.
- Standard24 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
Data link technology improves the efficiency of communications between controllers and pilots through supplementing voice communications with air-ground data link communications. On 30 September 2008 the Single Sky Committee has given a favourable opinion on the Implementing Rule on Data Link Services (DLS) in which the coordinated introduction of data link based on air-ground point-to-point data communications is described from 2011 onwards. The deployment of data link will also be the first major achievement that contributes to the first implementation package (IP1) of the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan (the ATM Master Plan). The Implementing Rule on Data Link Services (DLS) is requiring the following services that should be operated over an ATN (Aeronautical Communication Network( and VDL (Very High Frequency Digital Link) Mode 2 infrastructure: 1. DLIC - Data Link Initiation Capability (log on and contact) 2. ACM - Air Traffic Control (ATC) Communications Management 3. ACL - Air Traffic Control (ATC) Clearances 4. AMC - Air Traffic Control (ATC) Microphone Check The related European standards will be developed in accordance with the implementing rule on data link services and in line with the EUROCONTROL Specification on Data Link Services.
- Standard159 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard159 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard159 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard159 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to deployed Surface Movement Radar sensor as a constituent of an Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System in addition to EN 303 213-4-1 [2].
The present document provides a European Standard for manufacturers of the non-cooperative sensor constituent, who have to demonstrate and declare conformity for their constituent to the IOP Regulation. Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present document. As such the essential requirements of the Interoperability Regulation are not considered for software elements within the present document.
The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the environmental constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination. NOTE 1: For these ERs, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. NOTE 2: For those parts of the essential requirements, where annexes A and SA give no presumption of conformity, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the present document.
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard27 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard27 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to deployed cooperative sensor as a constituent of an Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System. The present document provides a European Standard for manufacturers of the non-cooperative sensor constituent, who have to demonstrate and declare conformity for their constituent to the IOP Regulation. Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present document. As such the essential requirements of the Interoperability Regulation are not considered for software elements within the present document. The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination. NOTE 1: For these ERs, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. NOTE 2: For those parts of the essential requirements, where annexes A and SA give no presumption of conformity, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the present document.
- Standard32 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard33 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard33 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard33 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to deployed non-cooperative sensor as a constituent of an Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System. The present document provides a European Standard for manufacturers of the non-cooperative sensor constituent, who have to demonstrate and declare conformity for their constituent to the IOP Regulation. Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present document. As such the essential requirements of the Interoperability Regulation are not considered for software elements within the present document. The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination. NOTE 1: For these ERs, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. NOTE 2: For those parts of the essential requirements, where annexes A and SA give no presumption of conformity, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the present document.
- Standard31 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard31 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard31 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems (A-SMGCS) Level 2. This system provides enhanced surveillance functionalities such as advanced monitoring and alerting functions. The present document provides a European Standard for Air Navigation Service Providers, who have to demonstrate and declare compliance of their systems and procedures to the IOP Regulation. Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present document. As such the essential requirements of the Interoperability Regulation are not considered for software elements within the present document. The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination. NOTE 1: For these ERs, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. NOTE 2: For those parts of the essential requirements, where annexes A and SA give no presumption of conformity, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the present document.
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard37 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard35 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard36 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
Scope of work to be undertaken: Update the European Standard for A-SMGCS System Level 1 considering the Amendment of EC 552/2004 by EC 1070/2009 and editorial changes. The present document is applicable to Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 1. This system provides enhanced surveillance functionalities, as well as a display to controllers with accurate and unambiguous identity and position information on the entire manoeuvring and movement area. The present document provides a European Standard for Air Navigation Service Providers, who have to demonstrate and declare compliance of their systems and procedures to the IOP regulation. Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present document. As such the essential requirements of the Interoperability Regulation are not considered for software elements within the present document. The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination. NOTE: For these ERs, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the present document.
- Standard39 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard38 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard38 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to Air Traffic Management Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM). The present document addresses the specific roles, responsibilities, procedures, systems and interfaces needed to fulfil the Airport CDM (A-CDM) Operating Concept as requested by Mandate M/390 of the European Commission. It references existing documentation where necessary to clarify the more detailed aspects of a procedure or system implementation requirement to avoid unnecessary repetition. Airport Collaborative Decision making (A-CDM) is about improving the way operational partners at airports and European ATFCM (Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management, Air Traffic Control, Airlines, Ground Handling Agents/Units and Airports) work together at an operational level. A-CDM allows an Airport CDM partner to make the right decisions for a flight during the whole Airport CDM process in collaboration with other Airport CDM partners, knowing their preferences and constraints and the actual and predicted situation. The decision making by the Airport CDM partners is dependent upon the sharing of accurate and timely information and upon adapted Airport CDM procedures, mechanisms and tools. Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-CDM System are outside of the scope of the present document. As such the essential requirements of the Interoperability Regulation are not considered for software elements within the present document. The present document does not give a presumption of conformity related to maintenance requirements, safety, civil/military coordination or environmental constraints. NOTE: For these ERs, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. Requirements in the present document which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the present document.
- Standard58 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard57 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard57 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard57 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
The present document is applicable to Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 1. This system provides enhanced surveillance functionalities, as well as a display to controllers with accurate and unambiguous identity and position information on the entire manoeuvring and movement area. The present document provides a European Standard for Air Navigation Service Providers, who have to demonstrate and declare compliance of their systems and procedures to the IOP regulation. Any software elements related to the software assurance level of an A-SMGCS are outside of the scope of the present document. As such the essential requirements of the Interoperability Regulation are not considered for software elements within the present document. The present document does not give presumption of conformity related to the maintenance requirements, environmental constraints, procedure level, effect of harmful interference and civil/military coordination. NOTE: For these ERs, please refer to the Air Navigation Service Provider procedures. Requirements in this EN 303 213-1 which refer to "should" statements or recommendations in the normatively referenced material (clause 2.1) are to be interpreted as fully normative ("shall") for the purpose of compliance with the present document.
- Standard33 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard35 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard46 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard35 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
DEN/ERM-TGAERO-36
- Standard50 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard50 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Draft50 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
- Draft24 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document provides technical specification and verification methods to support compliance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945 of 12 March 2019 on unmanned aircraft systems and on third-country operators of unmanned aircraft systems.
This part provides requirements, test methods and pass criteria for the means to terminate flight (flight termination) for unmanned aircraft systems, in particular addressing:
— safety related aspects of the architecture;
— descent performance;
— means to reduce the effects of impact on ground; and
— manufacturer’s instructions.
Even if security, including IT security, may be useful from an operational point of view, it falls outside the scope of this document.
An activation of the means to terminate the flight by a visual observer is also outside the scope of this document.
This document provides voluntary means of demonstrating compliance with the requirements laid out in Regulation (EU) 2019/945.
Additional hazards that occur from the characteristics of the payload are excluded and are, conversely, under the responsibility of the UAS manufacturer and UAS operator.
- Draft41 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document provides technical specification and verification methods to support compliance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945 of 12 March 2019 on unmanned aircraft systems and on third-country operators of unmanned aircraft systems.
This part provides requirements, test methods and pass criteria for the means to terminate flight (flight termination) for unmanned aircraft systems, in particular addressing:
— safety related aspects of the architecture;
— descent performance;
— means to reduce the effects of impact on ground; and
— manufacturer’s instructions.
Even if security, including IT security, may be useful from an operational point of view, it falls outside the scope of this document.
An activation of the means to terminate the flight by a visual observer is also outside the scope of this document.
This document provides voluntary means of demonstrating compliance with the requirements laid out in Regulation (EU) 2019/945.
Additional hazards that occur from the characteristics of the payload are excluded and are, conversely, under the responsibility of the UAS manufacturer and UAS operator.
- Draft41 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
- Draft24 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day





