ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 - Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection

This document provides a taxonomy, reference model, considerations for a security framework and a security problem definition for digital currency hardware wallets (DCHWs). It also specifies security objectives to address security issues related to the security problem definition. This document is applicable to organizations that develop and operate DCHWs, e.g. mobile device manufacturers, chip manufacturers and companies that provide DCHW solutions. This document is also relevant to third parties that provide services to these stakeholders. It addresses sovereign or fiat digital currencies issued by a specific entity, e.g. a central bank.

This document specifies an extension of evaluation methods and activities for cryptographic protocols based on ISO/IEC 15408-4, which provides a framework for evaluation methods and activities. This document provides a mapping between the work items for cryptographic protocol evaluation and the associated evaluation activities or evaluation methods. Additionally, this document also provides security assurance classification based on the cryptographic assessment performed by automated provers in four different levels of increasing assurance.

This document provides guidance for information security controls, based on ISO/IEC 27002, applicable to the provision and use of cloud services. This document provides: additional guidance for relevant controls specified in ISO/IEC 27002:2022; additional controls with guidance that specifically relate to cloud services. This document provides controls and guidance for cloud service customers (CSCs) and cloud service providers (CSPs). This document is considered to be a horizontal document as it provides a foundation and a common understanding of security regarding the provision and use of cloud services. NOTE This document applies to all types of cloud deployment models including the private cloud. When applying this document to the private cloud, the controls and guidance of this document are applicable, although adjustments can be necessary to adapt to the relationships and abilities of an organization’s internal departments.

This document specifies controls, purpose, and guidance for implementing controls, to meet the requirements identified by a risk and impact assessment related to the protection of personally identifiable information (PII). In particular, this document specifies requirements and guidance based on ISO/IEC 27002, taking into consideration the controls for processing PII that can be applicable within the context of an organization's information security risk environment(s). This document is applicable to all types and sizes of organizations acting as PII controllers (as defined in ISO/IEC 29100), including public and private companies, government entities and not-for-profit organizations that process PII, in particular, organizations that do not establish or operate a privacy information management system.

This document gives an overview of the concepts and principles used in the documents related to information security management systems (ISMS), including ISO/IEC 27001. This document is considered to be a horizontal document as it provides an explanation of the concepts and principles that underpin information security and ISMS.

This document specifies the security assurance requirements of the ISO/IEC 15408 series. It includes the individual assurance components from which the evaluation assurance levels and other packages contained in ISO/IEC 15408-5 are composed, and the criteria for evaluation of Protection Profiles (PPs), PP-Configurations, PP-Modules and Security Targets (STs).

This document specifies requirements and a standardized framework for specifying objective, repeatable and reproducible evaluation methods and evaluation activities. This document does not specify how to evaluate, adopt, or maintain evaluation methods and evaluation activities. These aspects are a matter for those originating the evaluation methods and evaluation activities in their particular area of interest.

This document specifies requirements for the required structure and content of security functional components for use during a security evaluation. It includes a catalogue of functional components that meet the common security functionality requirements of many IT products.

This document establishes the general concepts and principles of information technology (IT) security evaluation. It specifies the general model of evaluation given in this document, which in its entirety is intended to be used as the basis for evaluation of security properties of IT products. This document provides an overview of all parts of the ISO/IEC 15408 series. It describes the various parts of the ISO/IEC 15408 series i.e. defines the terms and abbreviations used in all parts of the series; establishes the core concept of a Target of Evaluation (TOE); describes the evaluation context; and describes the audience to which the evaluation criteria is addressed. Additionally, this document introduces the basic security concepts necessary for the evaluation of IT products.

This document specifies requirements and the minimum actions performed by an evaluator in order to conduct an evaluation using the criteria and evaluation evidence defined in the ISO/IEC 15408 series evaluation.

This document provides packages of security assurance and security functional requirements that are intended to be useful in support of common usage by stakeholders. The users of this document can include consumers, developers and evaluators of secure IT products.

This document provides guidelines on using zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) to improve privacy by reducing the risks associated with the sharing or transmission of personal data between organizations and users by minimizing unnecessary information disclosure. It includes several ZKP functional requirements relevant to a range of different business use cases, then describes how different ZKP models can be used to meet those functional requirements securely.

This document provides guidance on how to leverage existing ISO and IEC standards in a cybersecurity framework.

This document provides the minimum requirements for the knowledge and skills of assessment body testers and validators performing testing activities and validating activities for a conformance scheme using ISO/IEC 19790 and ISO/IEC 24759.

This document establishes a framework for age assurance systems and describes their core characteristics, including privacy and security, for enabling age-related eligibility decisions.

This document establishes an organized set of concepts and relationships to understand the competency requirements for information security conformance-testing and evaluation specialists, thereby establishing a basis for shared understanding of the concepts and principles central to the ISO/IEC 19896 series across its user communities.

This document provides the specialized requirements for individuals to demonstrate competence in performing IT product security evaluations and reviews according to the ISO/IEC 15408 series and ISO/IEC 18045. NOTE It is possible that evaluators and testers belong to bodies operating under ISO/IEC 17025 and reviewers belong to bodies operating under ISO/IEC 17065.

This document defines a cybersecurity labelling framework for the development and implementation of cybersecurity labelling programmes for consumer Internet of things (IoT) products. It provides requirements and guidance on the following topics: — risks and threats associated with consumer IoT products; — stakeholders, roles and responsibilities; — relevant standards and guidance documents; — conformity assessment; — labelling issuance and maintenance; — mutual recognition. This document is limited to consumer IoT products, such as: — IoT gateways, base stations and hubs to which multiple devices connect; smart cameras, televisions, and speakers; — wearable devices; — connected smoke detectors, door locks and window sensors; — connected home automation and alarm systems; — connected appliances, such as washing machines and fridges; — smart home assistants; and — connected children’s toys and baby monitors. Products that are not intended for consumer use are excluded from this document. Examples of excluded devices are those that are primarily intended for manufacturing, healthcare and other industrial purposes. This document is applicable to consumers, developers, issuing bodies of cybersecurity labels and conformity assessment bodies.

This document specifies requirements and provides guidance for bodies providing audit and certification of a privacy information management system (PIMS) according to ISO/IEC 27701, in addition to the requirements contained within ISO/IEC 17021-1. The requirements contained in this document are demonstrated in terms of competence and reliability by bodies providing PIMS certification. The guidance contained in this document provides additional interpretation of these requirements for bodies providing PIMS certification. NOTE This document can be used as a criteria document for accreditation, peer assessment or other audit processes.

This document specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving a privacy information management system (PIMS). Guidance is also provided to assist in the implementation of the requirements in this document. This document is intended for personally identifiable information (PII) controllers and PII processors holding responsibility and accountability for PII processing. This document is applicable to all types and sizes of organizations, including public and private companies, government entities and not-for-profit organizations.

This document provides guidance on how to use modelling in privacy engineering. It describes categories of models that can be used, the use of modelling to support engineering, and the relationships with other references, including International Standards on privacy engineering and on modelling. It provides high-level use cases describing how models are used.

This document: provides guidelines for the implementation of systems for the management of identity information; specifies requirements for the implementation and operation of a framework for identity management; is applicable to any information system where information relating to identity is processed or stored; is considered to be a horizontal document for the following reasons: it applies concepts such as distinguishing the term “identity” from the term “identifier” on the implementation of systems for the management of identity information and on the requirements for the implementation and operation of a framework for identity management, it provides an important contribution to assess identity management systems with regard to their privacy-friendliness and their ability to assure the relevant attributes of an identity, and consequently it provides a foundation and a common understanding for any other standard addressing identity, identity information, and identity management.

This document: defines terms for identity management and specifies core concepts of identity and identity management, and their relationships; is applicable to any information system where information relating to identity is processed or stored; is considered to be a horizontal document for the following reasons: it applies concepts such as distinguishing the term “identity” from the term “identifier” on the implementation of systems for the management of identity information and on the requirements for the implementation and operation of a framework for identity management, it provides an important contribution to assess identity management systems with regard to their privacy-friendliness and their ability to assure the relevant attributes of an identity, and consequently it provides a foundation and a common understanding for any other standard addressing identity, identity information, and identity management.

This document: provides requirements and guidance for the management of identity information and for ensuring that an identity management system conforms to ISO/IEC 24760-1 and ISO/IEC 24760-2; is applicable to any information system where information relating to identity is processed or stored; is considered to be a horizontal document for the following reasons: it applies concepts such as distinguishing the term “identity” from the term “identifier” on the implementation of systems for the management of identity information and on the requirements for the implementation and operation of a framework for identity management, it provides an important contribution to assess identity management systems with regard to their privacy-friendliness and their ability to assure the relevant attributes of an identity, and consequently it provides a foundation and a common understanding for any other standard addressing identity, identity information, and identity management.

This document establishes commonly accepted control objectives, controls and guidelines for implementing measures to protect personally identifiable information (PII) in line with the privacy principles in ISO/IEC 29100 for the public cloud computing environment. In particular, this document specifies guidelines based on ISO/IEC 27002:2022, taking into consideration the regulatory requirements for the protection of PII which can be applicable within the context of the information security risk environment(s) of a provider of public cloud services. This document is applicable to all types and sizes of organizations, including public and private companies, government entities and not-for-profit organizations, which provide information processing services as PII processors via cloud computing under contract to other organizations. The guidelines in this document can also be relevant to organizations acting as PII controllers.

This document provides high-level security and privacy requirements for authentication using biometrics on mobile devices, in particular, for functional components, communication, storage and remote processing. This document is applicable to remote modes, i.e. the cases where: — the biometric sample is captured through mobile devices, and — the biometric data or derived biometric data are transmitted between the mobile devices and the remote services in either or both directions. The following are out of scope of this document: — the cases where the biometric data or derived biometric data never leave the mobile devices (i.e. local modes), — the preliminary steps for biometric enrolment before authentication procedure, and — the use of biometric identification as part of the authentication.

This document specifies general principles, requirements and guidance for a security evaluation of a biometric system. This document provides an overview of the main biometric-specific aspects, i.e. recognition performance, presentation attack detection and privacy, and specifies principles to consider for the security evaluation of a biometric system. This document does not address the non-biometric aspects which can form part of the overall security evaluation of a system using biometric technology (e.g. requirements on databases or communication channels).

This document provides recommendations, requirements and checklists which can be used to support the specification and field testing of cryptographic modules in their field within an organization’s security system. The cryptographic modules have an overall security rating commensurate with the four security levels defined in ISO/IEC 19790:2025, to provide for: — a wide spectrum of data sensitivity (e.g. low-value administrative data, million-dollar funds transfers, life-protecting data, personal identity information, and sensitive information used by government), and — a diversity of application environments (e.g. a guarded facility, an office, removable media, and a completely unprotected location). This document is limited to the security related to the cryptographic module. It does not include assessing the security of the field or application environment. It does not define techniques for the identification, assessment and acceptance of the organization’s operational risk. This document applies to the field testers who perform the field testing for the cryptographic modules in their field and the authorizing officials of cryptographic modules.

This document describes the concepts and principles of information and communication technology (ICT) readiness for business continuity (IRBC). It provides a framework of methods and processes to identify and specify aspects for improving an organization's ICT readiness to ensure business continuity. This document serves the following business continuity objectives for ICT: — minimum business continuity objective (MBCO), — recovery point objective (RPO), — recovery time objective (RTO) as part of the ICT business continuity planning. This document is applicable to all types and sizes of organizations. This document describes how ICT departments plan and prepare to contribute to the resilience objectives of the organization.

This document specifies the methods to be used by testing laboratories to test whether the cryptographic module conforms to the requirements specified in ISO/IEC 19790:2025. The methods are developed to provide a high degree of objectivity during the testing process and to ensure consistency across the testing laboratories. This document also specifies the information that vendors are required to provide testing laboratories as supporting evidence to demonstrate their cryptographic modules’ conformity to the requirements specified in ISO/IEC 19790:2025. Vendors can also use this document to verify whether their cryptographic modules satisfy the requirements specified in ISO/IEC 19790:2025 before applying to a testing laboratory for testing.

This document specifies the security requirements for a cryptographic module utilized within a security system protecting sensitive information in Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). It defines four security levels for cryptographic modules to provide for a wide spectrum of data sensitivity and a diversity of application environments. This document specifies up to four security levels for each of the 11 requirement areas with each security level increasing security over the preceding level.

This document specifies a conceptual model for a random bit generator for cryptographic purposes, together with the elements of this model. This document specifies the characteristics of the main elements required for both non-deterministic and deterministic random bit generators. It also establishes the security requirements for both non-deterministic and deterministic random bit generators. Techniques for statistical testing of random bit generators for the purposes of independent verification or validation and detailed designs for such generators are outside the scope of this document.

This document provides guidelines on privacy for fintech services. It identifies all relevant business models and roles in consumer-to-business relations and business-to-business relations, as well as privacy risks and privacy requirements, which are related to fintech services. It provides specific privacy controls for fintech services to address privacy risks. This document is based on the principles from ISO/IEC 29100, ISO/IEC 27701, and ISO/IEC 29184, the privacy impact assessment framework described in ISO/IEC 29134, and the risk management guideline described in ISO 31000. It also provides guidelines focusing on a set of privacy requirements for each stakeholder. This document can be applicable to all kinds of organizations such as regulators, institutions, service providers and product providers in the fintech service environment.

This document specifies anonymous digital signature mechanisms in which a verifier uses multiple public keys to verify a digital signature. This document provides: — a general description of an anonymous digital signature mechanism using multiple public keys; — a variety of mechanisms that provide such anonymous digital signatures. For each mechanism, this document specifies the process for: — generating the private key and public key of each user; — producing signatures; — verifying signatures; — linking signatures (if the mechanism supports linking); — tracing signatures (if the mechanism supports tracing); — producing signatures with threshold capability (if the mechanism supports a threshold capability); — verifying signatures with threshold capability (if the mechanism supports a threshold capability). This document does not define the implementation of a public key infrastructure (PKI) and the means for distinct entities to exchange, extract and verify their respective public key certificates.

This document provides guidelines for multiple organizations handling information security incidents in a coordinated manner. It also addresses the impacts of external cooperation on the internal incident management of an individual organization and provides guidelines for an individual organization to adapt to the coordination process. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the coordination team, if it exists, to perform coordination activities supporting the cross-organization incident response. The principles given in this document are generic and are intended to be applicable to multiple organizations to work together to handle information security incidents, regardless of their types, sizes or nature. Organizations can adjust the guidance given in this document according to their type, sizes and nature of business in relation to the information security risk situation. This document is also applicable to an individual organization that participates in partner relationships.

This document provides information security controls for the energy utility industry, based on ISO/IEC 27002:2022, for controlling and monitoring the production or generation, transmission, storage and distribution of electric power, gas, oil and heat, and for the control of associated supporting processes. This includes in particular the following: — central and distributed process control, monitoring and automation technology as well as information systems used for their operation, such as programming and parameterization devices; — digital controllers and automation components such as control and field devices or programmable logic controllers (PLCs), including digital sensor and actuator elements; — all further supporting information systems used in the process control domain, e.g. for supplementary data visualization tasks and for controlling, monitoring, data archiving, historian logging, reporting and documentation purposes; — communication technology used in the process control domain, e.g. networks, telemetry, telecontrol applications and remote-control technology; — Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) components, e.g. smart meters; — measurement devices, e.g. for emission values; — digital protection and safety systems, e.g. protection relays, safety PLCs, emergency governor mechanisms; — energy management systems, e.g. for distributed energy resources (DER), electric charging infrastructures, and for private households, residential buildings or industrial customer installations; — distributed components of smart grid environments, e.g. in energy grids, in private households, residential buildings or industrial customer installations; — all software, firmware and applications installed on above-mentioned systems, e.g. distribution management system (DMS) applications or outage management systems (OMS); — any premises housing the abovementioned equipment and systems; — remote maintenance systems for abovementioned systems. This document does not apply to the process control domain of nuclear facilities. This domain is covered by IEC 63096.

This document specifies cryptographic mechanisms to redact authentic data. The mechanisms described in this document offer different combinations of the security properties defined and described in ISO/IEC 23264-1. For all mechanisms, this document describes the processes for key generation, generating the redactable attestation, carrying out redactions and verifying redactable attestations. This document contains mechanisms that are based on asymmetric cryptography using three related transformations: ¾ a public transformation defined by a verification key (verification process for verifying a redactable attestation), ¾ a private transformation defined by a private attestation key (redactable attestation process for generating a redactable attestation), and ¾ a third transformation defined by the redaction key (redaction process) allowing to redact authentic information within the constraints set forth during generation of the attestation such that redacted information cannot be reconstructed. This document contains mechanisms which, after a successful redaction, allow the attestation to remain verifiable using the verification transformation and attest that non-redacted fields of the attested message are unmodified. This document further details that the three transformations have the property whereby it is computationally infeasible to derive the private attestation transformation, given the redaction and or the verification transformation and key(s).

This document provides guidelines for identity-related risk, as an extension of ISO 31000:2018. More specifically, it uses the process outlined in ISO 31000 to guide users in establishing context and assessing risk, including providing risk scenarios for processes and implementations that are exposed to identity-related risk. This document is applicable to the risk assessment of processes and services that rely on or are related to identity. This document does not include aspects of risk related to general issues of delivery, technology or security.

This document provides guidelines to analyse security and privacy risks and identifies controls that can be implemented in Internet of Things (IoT)-domotics systems.

This document specifies stateful digital signature mechanisms with appendix, where the level of security is determined by the security properties of the underlying hash function. This document also provides requirements for implementing basic state management, which is needed for the secure deployment of the stateful schemes described in this document.

This document surveys and summarizes the existing hardware monitoring methods, including research efforts and industrial applications. The explored monitoring technologies are classified by applied area, carrier type, target entity, objective pattern, and method of deployment. Moreover, this document summarizes the possible ways of utilizing monitoring technologies for hardware security assessment with some existing state-of-the-art security assessment approaches. The hardware mentioned in this document refers only to the core processing hardware, such as the central processing unit (CPU), microcontroller unit (MCU), and system on a chip (SoC), in the von Neumann system and does not include single-input or single-output devices such as memory or displays. The hardware monitoring technology discussed in this document has the following considerations and restrictions: — the monitored target is for the post-silicon phase, not for the design-house phase (e.g. an RTL or netlist design); — monitoring is only applied to the runtime system.

This document provides guidelines supporting the implementation of information security controls in telecommunications organizations. The adoption of this document will allow telecommunications organizations to meet baseline information security management requirements of confidentiality, integrity, availability and any other relevant information security property.

This guidance document describes a model and method to operationalize the privacy principles specified in ISO/IEC 29100 into sets of controls and functional capabilities. The method is described as a process that builds upon ISO/IEC/IEEE 24774. This document is designed for use in conjunction with relevant privacy and security standards and guidance which impact privacy operationalization. It supports networked, interdependent applications and systems. This document is intended for engineers and other practitioners developing systems controlling or processing personally identifiable information.