CLC/TS 61496-3:2008

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-januar-2009
1DGRPHãþD
SIST-TS CLC/TS 61496-3:2005
9DUQRVWVWURMHY(OHNWULþQRREþXWOMLYD]DãþLWQDRSUHPDGHO3RVHEQH]DKWHYH
]DDNWLYQHRSWRHOHNWURQVNH]DãþLWQHHOHPHQWHNLVHRG]LYDMRQDGLIX]QLRGERM
$23''5,(&
Safety of machinery - Electro-sensitive protective equipment -- Part 3: Particular
requirements for Active Opto-electronic Protective Devices responsive to Diffuse
Reflection (AOPDDR)
Sicherheit von Maschinen - Berührungslos wirkende Schutzeinrichtungen -- Teil 3:
Besondere Anforderungen an aktive optoelektronische diffuse Reflektion nutzende
Schutzeinrichtungen (AOPDDR)
Sécurité des machines - Equipements de protection électro-sensibles -- Partie 3:
Exigences particulières pour les équipements utilisant des dispositifs protecteurs
optoélectroniques actifs sensibles aux réflexions diffuses (AOPDDR)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CLC/TS 61496-3:2008
ICS:
13.110 Varnost strojev Safety of machinery
31.260 Optoelektronika, laserska Optoelectronics. Laser
oprema equipment
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
CLC/TS 61496-3
SPÉCIFICATION TECHNIQUE
May 2008
TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION
ICS 13.110; 31.260 Supersedes CLC/TS 61496-3:2003

English version
Safety of machinery -
Electro-sensitive protective equipment -
Part 3: Particular requirements for Active Opto-electronic Protective
Devices responsive to Diffuse Reflection (AOPDDR)
(IEC 61496-3:2008)
Sécurité des machines -  Sicherheit von Maschinen -
Equipements de protection Berührungslos wirkende
électro-sensibles - Schutzeinrichtungen -
Partie 3: Exigences particulières pour les Teil 3: Besondere Anforderungen an
équipements utilisant des dispositifs aktive optoelektronische diffuse Reflektion
protecteurs optoélectroniques actifs nutzende Schutzeinrichtungen (AOPDDR)
sensibles aux réflexions diffuses (IEC 61496-3:2008)
(AOPDDR)
(CEI 61496-3:2008)
This Technical Specification was approved by CENELEC on 2008-03-01.

CENELEC members are required to announce the existence of this TS in the same way as for an EN and to
make the TS available promptly at national level in an appropriate form. It is permissible to keep conflicting
national standards in force.
CENELEC members are the national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the
Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia,
Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain,
Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

CENELEC
European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization
Comité Européen de Normalisation Electrotechnique
Europäisches Komitee für Elektrotechnische Normung

Central Secretariat: rue de Stassart 35, B - 1050 Brussels

© 2008 CENELEC - All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CENELEC members.
Ref. No. CLC/TS 61496-3:2008 E

Foreword
The text of document 44/572/FDIS, future edition 2 of IEC 61496-3, prepared by IEC TC 44, Safety of
machinery - Electrotechnical aspects, in collaboration with the Technical Committee CENELEC TC 44X,
Safety of machinery: electrotechnical aspects, was submitted to the IEC-CENELEC parallel vote and was
approved by CENELEC as CLC/TS 61496-3 on 2008-03-01.
This Technical Specification supersedes CLC/TS 61496-3:2003.
The most important changes and improvements compared to CLC/TS 61496-3:2003 are:
– extension of the range of detection capability covered by this part of the standard from 50 mm to
100 mm to the range of 30 mm to 200 mm;
– clarification of requirements for the selection of multiple detection zones (Clause A.10);
– more detailed information about the use of an AOPDDR as a whole body trip device by extension of
Clause A.12 and a new Clause A.13;
– improved description of the relationship between ranging accuracy and probability of detection
(Annex BB).
This Technical Specification is to be used in conjunction with EN 61496-1.
The following date was fixed:
– latest date by which the existence of the CLC/TS
has to be announced at national level (doa) 2008-06-01
Annex ZA has been added by CENELEC.
__________
Endorsement notice
The text of the International Standard IEC 61496-3:2008 was approved by CENELEC as a Technical
Specification without any modification.
In the official version, for Bibliography, the following note has to be added for the standard indicated:
ISO 14121-1 NOTE  Harmonized as EN ISO 14121-1:2007 (not modified).
__________
-
- 3 - CLC/TS 61496-3:2008
Annex ZA
(normative)
Normative references to international publications
with their corresponding European publications

Addition to Annex ZA of EN 61496-1:
Publication Year Title EN/HD Year

- - High-visibility warning clothing for EN 471 2003
professional use - Test methods and
requirements
IEC 60068-2-14 1984 Environmental testing -

+ A1 1986 Part 2: Tests - Test N: Change of EN 60068-2-14 1999
temperature
IEC 60068-2-75 1997 Environmental testing - EN 60068-2-75 1997
Part 2-75: Tests - Test Eh: Hammer tests

1) 2)
IEC 60825-1 - Safety of laser products - EN 60825-1 2007
Part 1: Equipment classification and
requirements
IEC 61496-1 2004 Safety of machinery - Electro-sensitive EN 61496-1 2004
(mod) protective equipment -
Part 1: General requirements and tests

1) 2)
IEC/TS 62046 - Safety of machinery - Application of CLC/TS 62046 2008
protective equipment to detect the presence
of persons
ISO 13855 2002 Safety of machinery - Positioning of - -
protective equipment with respect to the
approach speeds of parts of the human body

1)
Undated reference.
2)
Valid edition at date of issue.

IEC 61496-3
Edition 2.0 2008-02
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD
NORME
INTERNATIONALE
Safety of machinery – Electro-sensitive protective equipment –
Part 3: Particular requirements for Active Opto-electronic Protective Devices
responsive to Diffuse Reflection (AOPDDR)

Sécurité des machines – Equipements de protection électro-sensibles –
Partie 3: Exigences particulières pour les équipements utilisant des dispositifs
protecteurs optoélectroniques actifs sensibles aux réflexions diffuses
(AOPDDR)
INTERNATIONAL
ELECTROTECHNICAL
COMMISSION
COMMISSION
ELECTROTECHNIQUE
PRICE CODE
INTERNATIONALE
XB
CODE PRIX
ICS 13.110; 31.260 ISBN 2-8318-9588-X

– 2 – 61496-3 © IEC:2008
CONTENTS
FOREWORD.4
INTRODUCTION.6

1 Scope.7
2 Normative references.8
3 Terms and definitions .8
4 Requirements .9
4.1 Functional requirements .9
4.2 Design requirements.9
4.3 Environmental requirements .16
5 Testing .18
5.1 General .18
5.2 Functional tests .25
5.3 Performance testing under fault conditions.32
5.4 Environmental tests .32
6 Marking for identification and for safe use .46
6.1 General .46
7 Accompanying documents .46

Annex A (normative) Optional functions of the ESPE .48
Annex B (normative) Catalogue of single faults affecting the electrical equipment of the
ESPE, to be applied as specified in 5.3 .56
Annex AA (informative) Examples of the use of an AOPDDR in different applications.57
Annex BB (informative) Relationship between ranging accuracy and probability of
detection.61

Bibliography .69

Figure 1 – Detection zone of an AOPDDR – Example 1 .12
Figure 2 – Detection zone of an AOPDDR – Example 2 .13
Figure 3 – Minimum diffuse reflectivity of materials.15
Figure 4 – Influence on detection capability by incandescent light – Example 1 .19
Figure 5 – Influence on detection capability by incandescent light – Example 2 .20
Figure 6 – Influence on detection capability by light reflected by the background.21
Figure 7 – Influence on detection capability by stroboscopic light – Example 1 .22
Figure 8 – Influence on detection capability by stroboscopic light – Example 2 .23
Figure 9 – Light interference test .24
Figure 10 – Interference between two AOPDDRs of identical design .25
Figure 11 – Configuration for the endurance test – Example 1 .30
Figure 12 – Configuration for the endurance test – Example 2 .31
Figure 13a – Test of homogeneous pollution – Examples of different designs of
AOPDDR housings and optical windows without foil for simulation of homogeneous
pollution .42

61496-3 © IEC:2008 – 3 –
Figure 13b – Test of homogeneous pollution – Examples of different designs of
AOPDDR housings and optical windows – Examples of correct positions of the foil.43
Figure 13c – Test of homogeneous pollution – Examples of different designs of
AOPDDR housings and optical windows – Examples of incorrect positions of the foil .43
Figure 14 – Influence on detection capability by background .44
Figure A.1 – Use of an AOPDDR as a whole-body trip device – Example 1 .51
Figure A.2 – Use of an AOPDDR as a whole-body trip device – Example 2 .52
Figure A.3 – Use of an AOPDDR as parts of a body trip device – Example 1.54
Figure A.4 – Use of an AOPDDR as parts of a body trip device – Example 2.54
Figure AA.1 – Example of the use of an AOPDDR on machinery.58
Figure AA.2 – Example of the use of an AOPDDR on an AGV.59
Figure BB.1 – Relationship between ranging accuracy and detection zone .61
Figure BB.2 – Relationship between ranging accuracy, detection zone and the
probabilistic part of the tolerance zone – Example 1 .62
Figure BB.3 – Relationship between ranging accuracy, detection zone and the
probabilistic part of the tolerance zone – Example 2 .63
Figure BB.4 – Relationship between ranging accuracy, detection zone and tolerance
zone – Example 1 .64
Figure BB.5 – Relationship between ranging accuracy, detection zone and tolerance
zone – Example 2 .65
Figure BB.6 – Reference boundary monitoring – Distribution of measurement values –
Example 1.66
Figure BB.7 – Reference boundary monitoring – Distribution of measurement values –
Example 2.66
Figure BB.8 – POD of a single measurement (logarithmic) for a MooM-evaluation with 1
≤ M ≤ 50 .67
Figure BB.9 – POD of a single measurement for a MooM-evaluation with 1 ≤ M ≤ 50 in
relation to σ in the case of a normal distribution.68

Table 1 – Minimum tests required for the verification of detection capability
requirements (see also 4.2.12.1) .27
Table 2 – Overview of light interference tests .36

– 4 – 61496-3 © IEC:2008
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION
____________
SAFETY OF MACHINERY –
ELECTRO-SENSITIVE PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT –

Part 3: Particular requirements for Active Opto-electronic
Protective Devices responsive to
Diffuse Reflection (AOPDDR)
FOREWORD
1) The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is a worldwide organization for standardization comprising
all national electrotechnical committees (IEC National Committees). The object of IEC is to promote
international co-operation on all questions concerning standardization in the electrical and electronic fields. To
this end and in addition to other activities, IEC publishes International Standards, Technical Specifications,
Technical Reports, Publicly Available Specifications (PAS) and Guides (hereafter referred to as “IEC
Publication(s)”). Their preparation is entrusted to technical committees; any IEC National Committee interested
in the subject dealt with may participate in this preparatory work. International, governmental and non-
governmental organizations liaising with the IEC also participate in this preparation. IEC collaborates closely
with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in accordance with conditions determined by
agreement between the two organizations.
2) The formal decisions or agreements of IEC on technical matters express, as nearly as possible, an international
consensus of opinion on the relevant subjects since each technical committee has representation from all
interested IEC National Committees.
3) IEC Publications have the form of recommendations for international use and are accepted by IEC National
Committees in that sense. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure that the technical content of IEC
Publications is accurate, IEC cannot be held responsible for the way in which they are used or for any
misinterpretation by any end user.
4) In order to promote international uniformity, IEC National Committees undertake to apply IEC Publications
transparently to the maximum extent possible in their national and regional publications. Any divergence
between any IEC Publication and the corresponding national or regional publication shall be clearly indicated in
the latter.
5) IEC provides no marking procedure to indicate its approval and cannot be rendered responsible for any
equipment declared to be in conformity with an IEC Publication.
6) All users should ensure that they have the latest edition of this publication.
7) No liability shall attach to IEC or its directors, employees, servants or agents including individual experts and
members of its technical committees and IEC National Committees for any personal injury, property damage or
other damage of any nature whatsoever, whether direct or indirect, or for costs (including legal fees) and
expenses arising out of the publication, use of, or reliance upon, this IEC Publication or any other IEC
Publications.
8) Attention is drawn to the Normative references cited in this publication. Use of the referenced publications is
indispensable for the correct application of this publication.
9) Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this IEC Publication may be the subject of
patent rights. IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
International Standard IEC 61496-3 has been prepared by IEC technical committee 44: Safety
of machinery – Electrotechnical aspects, in collaboration with CENELEC technical committee
44X: Safety of machinery – Electrotechnical aspects.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition issued in 2001 and constitutes a
technical revision.
The most important changes and improvements compared to the first edition of this part of the
standard are:
– extension of the range of detection capability covered by this part of the standard from
50 mm to 100 mm to the range of 30 mm to 200 mm;
– clarification of requirements for the selection of multiple detection zones (Clause A.10);

61496-3 © IEC:2008 – 5 –
– more detailed information about the use of an AOPDDR as a whole body trip device by
extension of Clause A.12 and a new Clause A.13;
– improved description of the relationship between ranging accuracy and probability of
detection (Annex BB).
This International Standard is to be used in conjunction with IEC 61496-1.
The text of this standard is based on the following documents:
FDIS Report on voting
44/572/FDIS 44/578/RVD
Full information on the voting for the approval of this standard can be found in the report on
voting indicated in the above table.
This publication has been drafted in accordance with the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
A list of all parts of IEC 61496 series, under the general title Safety of machinery – Electro-
sensitive protective equipment, can be found on the IEC website.
The committee has decided that the contents of this publication will remain unchanged until the
maintenance result date indicated on the IEC web site under "http://webstore.iec.ch" in the data
related to the specific publication. At this date, the publication will be
• reconfirmed,
• withdrawn,
• replaced by a revised edition, or
• amended.
This standard has the status of a dedicated product standard and may be used as a normative
reference in a dedicated product standard for the safety of machinery.

– 6 – 61496-3 © IEC:2008
INTRODUCTION
An electro-sensitive protective equipment (ESPE) is applied to machinery presenting a risk of
personal injury. It provides protection by causing the machine to revert to a safe condition
before a person can be placed in a hazardous situation.
This part supplements or modifies the corresponding clauses in IEC 61496-1 to specify
particular requirements for the design, construction and testing of electro-sensitive protective
equipment (ESPE) for the safeguarding of machinery, employing active opto-electronic
protective devices responsive to diffuse reflection (AOPDDRs) for the sensing function.
Where a particular clause or subclause of part 1 is not mentioned in this part 3, that clause or
subclause applies as far as is reasonable. Where this part states "addition", "modification" or
"replacement", the relevant text of part 1 should be adapted accordingly.
Supplementary Annexes are entitled AA, BB, etc.
Each type of machine presents its own particular hazards, and it is not the purpose of this
standard to recommend the manner of application of the ESPE to any particular machine. The
application of the ESPE should be a matter for agreement between the equipment supplier, the
machine user and the enforcing authority. In this context, attention is drawn to the relevant
guidance established internationally, for example, ISO/TR 12100.
Due to the complexity of the technology there are many issues that are highly dependent on
analysis and expertise in specific test and measurement techniques. In order to provide a high
level of confidence, independent review by relevant expertise is recommended.

61496-3 © IEC:2008 – 7 –
SAFETY OF MACHINERY –
ELECTRO-SENSITIVE PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT –

Part 3: Particular requirements for Active Opto-electronic
Protective Devices responsive to
Diffuse Reflection (AOPDDR)
1 Scope
Replacement:
This part of IEC 61496 specifies additional requirements for the design, construction and
testing of non-contact electro-sensitive protective equipment (ESPE) designed specifically to
detect persons as part of a safety related system, employing active opto-electronic protective
devices responsive to diffuse reflection (AOPDDRs) for the sensing function. Special attention
is directed to requirements which ensure that an appropriate safety-related performance is
achieved. An ESPE may include optional safety-related functions, the requirements for which
are given both in Annex A of this part and in Annex A of IEC 61496-1.
This part does not specify the dimensions or configurations of the detection zone and its
disposition in relation to hazardous parts for any particular application, nor what constitutes a
hazardous state of any machine. It is restricted to the functioning of the ESPE and how it
interfaces with the machine.
AOPDDRs are devices that have a detection zone specified in two dimensions wherein
radiation in the near infrared range is emitted by a transmitter element(s). When the emitted
radiation impinges on an object (for example, a person or part of a person), a portion of the
emitted radiation is reflected to a receiving element(s) by diffuse reflection whereby the
presence of the object can be detected.
NOTE 1 Under certain circumstances, limitations of the sensor in relation to its use need to be considered. For
example:
– Objects that generate mirror-like (specular) reflections may not be detected if the diffuse reflectance value is
less than that specified for the "black" test piece.
– The determination of the minimal reflection factors for the detection of obstacles is based on the clothing of a
person. Objects having a reflectivity lower than that considered in this part may not be detected.
Excluded from this part are AOPDDRs employing radiation of wavelength outside the range
820 nm to 946 nm, and those employing radiation other than that generated by the AOPDDR
itself. For sensing devices that employ radiation of wavelengths outside this range, this part
may be used as a guide. This part is relevant for AOPDDRs having a stated detection capability
in the range from 30 mm to 200 mm. AOPDDRs intended for use as trip device using whole-
body detection with normal approach to the detection zone and having a stated detection
capability not exceeding 200 mm shall meet the requirements of Clause A.12. AOPDDRs
intended for a direction of approach normal to the detection zone and having a stated detection
capability in the range from 30 mm to 70 mm shall meet the requirements of Clause A.13.
NOTE 2 According to ISO 13855 (EN 999), 6.3 foreseeable angles of approach greater than 30” should be
considered normal approach and foreseeable angles of approach less than 30” should be considered parallel
approach.
NOTE 3 According to ISO 13855 (EN 999), 6.2 when electro-sensitive protective equipment employing active opto-
electronic protective devices is used for direction of approach parallel to the detection zone the device should have
a detection capability in the range from 50 mm to 117 mm.

– 8 – 61496-3 © IEC:2008
This part may be relevant to applications other than those for the protection of persons, for
example, for the protection of machinery or products from mechanical damage. In those
applications, different requirements may be necessary, for example when the materials that
have to be recognized by the sensing function have different properties from those of persons
and their clothing.
This part does not deal with electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) emission requirements.
Opto-electronic devices that perform only one-dimensional spot-like distance measurements,
for example, proximity switches, are not covered by this part.
2 Normative references
Addition:
IEC 60068-2-14:1984, Basic environmental testing procedures – Part 2: Tests – Test N:
Change of temperature
Amendment 1 (1986)
IEC 60068-2-75:1997-08, Environmental testing – Part 2-75: Tests – Test Eh: Hammer tests
IEC 60825-1, Safety of laser products – Part 1: Equipment classification, requirements and
user’s guide
IEC 61496-1:2004, Safety of machinery – Electro-sensitive protective equipment – Part 1:
General requirements and tests
IEC 62046 , Safety of machinery – Application of protective equipment to detect the presence
of persons
ISO 13855:2002, Safety of machinery – Positioning of protective equipment with respect to the
approach speeds of parts of the human body
EN 471:2003-09, High-visibility warning clothing for professional use – Test methods and
requirements
3 Terms and definitions
Replacement:
3.4
detection zone
zone within which the specified test piece(s) (see 4.2.13) is detected by the AOPDDR with a
minimum required probability of detection (see 4.2.12.2)
NOTE A tolerance zone is necessary to achieve the required probability of detection of the specified test piece(s)
within the detection zone.
Addition:
———————
To be published.
61496-3 © IEC:2008 – 9 –
3.301
active opto-electronic protective device responsive to diffuse reflection
AOPDDR
device, whose sensing function is performed by opto-electronic emitting and receiving
elements, that detects the diffuse reflection of optical radiations generated within the device by
an object present in a detection zone specified in two dimensions
3.302
AOPDDR detection capability
ability to detect the specified test pieces (see 4.2.13) in the detection zone
NOTE A list of influences which can affect the AOPDDR detection capability is given in 4.2.12.1.
3.303
tolerance zone
zone outside of and adjacent to the detection zone within which the specified test piece(s) (see
4.2.13) is detected with a probability of detection lower than the required probability within the
detection zone. The tolerance zone is necessary to achieve the required probability of detection
of the specified test piece(s) within the detection zone
NOTE For explanation of the concept of probability of detection and the tolerance zone see Annex BB.
4 Requirements
This clause of part 1 is applicable except as follows:
4.1 Functional requirements
4.1.3 Types of ESPE
Replacement:
In this part of IEC 61496 only a type 3 ESPE is considered. It is the responsibility of the
machine supplier and/or the user to prescribe if this type is suitable for a particular application.
The type 3 ESPE shall fulfil the fault detection requirements of 4.2.2.4 of this part. In normal
operation, the output circuit of each of at least two output signal switching devices (OSSDs) of
the type 3 ESPE shall go to the OFF-state when the sensing device is actuated, or when the
power is removed from the device.
Additional functional requirements:
4.1.4 Zone(s) with limited detection capability
A zone between the optical window and the beginning of the detection zone is referred to as a
zone with limited detection capability. In order to ensure no hazard can arise in a particular
application due to the presence of this zone(s) between the optical window and the detection
zone, its dimensions and appropriate information for use shall be provided by the supplier.
A zone with limited detection capability shall not extend more than 50 mm from the optical
window in the plane of detection.
4.2 Design requirements
4.2.2 Fault detection requirements
4.2.2.2 Particular requirements for a type 1 ESPE
This subclause of part 1 is not applicable.

– 10 – 61496-3 © IEC:2008
4.2.2.3 Particular requirements for a type 2 ESPE
This subclause of part 1 is not applicable.
4.2.2.4 Particular requirements for a type 3 ESPE
Replacement:
A single fault in the sensing device resulting in a complete loss of the stated AOPDDR
detection capability shall cause the ESPE to go to a lock-out condition within the specified
response time.
NOTE 1 For AOPDDR using rotating mirrors for scanning the detection zone, this requirement can be fulfilled by
scanning on a defined reference object located outside the detection zone and the tolerance zone.
A single fault resulting in a deterioration of the stated AOPDDR detection capability shall cause
the ESPE to go to a lock-out condition within a time period of 5 s following the occurrence of
that fault.
NOTE 2 Examples of deterioration of the AOPDDR detection capability include:
– increase of the minimum detectable object size;
– increase in the minimum detectable reflectance;
– decrease of measurement accuracy.
A single fault resulting in an increase in response time beyond the specified value or preventing
at least one OSSD going to the OFF-state shall cause the ESPE to go to a lock-out condition
immediately, i.e. within the response time, or immediately upon any of the following demand
events where fault detection requires a change in state:
– on actuation of the sensing function;
– on switch off/on;
– on reset of the start interlock or the restart interlock, if available (see Clauses A.5 and A.6
of IEC 61496-1);
– on the application of an external test signal, if available.
NOTE 3 An external test signal may be required if, for example, in a particular application, the frequency of
actuation of the sensing function is foreseeably low and the OSSDs are monitored only at the change of state.
It shall not be possible for the ESPE to achieve a reset from a lock-out condition, for example,
by interruption and restoration of the mains power supply or by any other means, when the fault
which initiated the lock-out condition is still present.
In cases where a single fault which does not cause a failure to danger of the ESPE is not
detected, the occurrence of further faults shall not cause a failure to danger. For verification of
this requirement, see 5.3.4.
4.2.2.5 Particular requirements for a type 4 ESPE
This subclause of part 1 is not applicable.
Additional design requirements:
4.2.12 Integrity of the AOPDDR detection capability
4.2.12.1 General
The design of the AOPDDR shall ensure that the detection capability is not decreased below
the limits specified by the supplier and in this standard by any of, but not limited to, the
following:
61496-3 © IEC:2008 – 11 –
− ageing of components;
− component tolerances (for example, spectral sensitivity of the receiver element);
− distance-dependent changes of sensitivity related for example to optics;
− limits of adjustment;
− insecure fixing of optical and mechanical components within the AOPDDR;
− environmental interference, especially:
a) system noise;
b) electrical interference according to 4.3.2 of IEC 61496-1;
c) pollution on the surface of the optical window of the housing;
d) condensation on the surface of the optical window of the housing;
e) ambient temperature;
f) ambient light;
g) background (for example, contrast between object and background);
h) vibration and bump;
i) humidity;
j) supply voltage variations and interruptions;
k) reflections of emitted light(s) from parts of the surrounding especially for devices with
more than one transmitting and/or receiving element.
If a single fault (as specified in Annex B of IEC 61496-1), which under normal operating
conditions (see 5.1.2.1 of IEC 61496-1) would not result in a loss of the stated AOPDDR
detection capability but, when occurring with a combination of the above conditions, would
result in such a loss, that fault, together with that combination of conditions, shall be
considered as a single fault and the AOPDDR shall respond to such a single fault as required
in 4.2.2.4.
NOTE The technique of scanning on a reference object can satisfy the requirement in respect of ageing of
components. Other techniques giving the same level of assurance may be used.
4.2.12.2 Detection zone(s) and tolerance zone(s)
The supplier shall specify the tolerance zone(s).
The supplier shall take into account worst-case conditions including, for example, signal-to-
noise ratio S/N and standard deviation σ considering all influences listed in this standard and
any additional influences specified by the supplier (environmental influence, component faults,
etc.).
The tolerance zone depends on systematic interferences, measurement faults, resolution of the
measurement values, etc. and is necessary to ensure the required detection probability within
the detection zone. Figures 1 and 2 show examples of tolerance zones.

– 12 – 61496-3 © IEC:2008
Top view
b
a
IEC  035/08
Key
1 Detection zone within which the specified test piece(s) is detected by the AOPDDR with a minimum required
probability of detection.
2 Tolerance zone (detection not assured).
3 Zone with limited detection capability (detection not assured).
4 AOPDDR
NOTE 1 For an application of the AOPDDR, it may be necessary to take into account that the size of parts of the
tolerance zone can be related for example to the diameter of the test piece and the beam position (see value of "a").
The value of "b" corresponds for example to the distance measurement accuracy.
NOTE 2 The detection zone origin is marked by a cross.
Figure 1 – Detection zone of an AOPDDR – Example 1

61496-3 © IEC:2008 – 13 –
Top view
a b
IEC  036/08
Key
1 Detection zone
2 Tolerance zone
3 AOPDDR
NOTE The value of "a" corresponds for example to the diameter of the test piece and the beam position. The
value of "b" corresponds for example to the distance measurement accuracy.
Figure 2 – Detection zone of an AOPDDR – Example 2
The test pieces (see 4.2.13) shall be detected with a minimum probability of detection of
–7
1 – 2,9 × 10 throughout the detection zone(s). To achieve this minimum probability of detection,
the tolerance zone is added to the detection zone (see Figure BB.2). Even if a measured
distance value of a test piece falls into the tolerance zone this test piece will be determined as
detected and the OSSDs shall go to the OFF-state or remain in the OFF-state.
NOTE 1 The tolerance zone is not included in the detection zone.
NOTE 2 Probability of detection as used in this part is not related to the probability of faults.
NOTE 3 Special attention may be required when the detection zone of AOPDDR is made up by more than one
transmitting and/or receiving unit to ensure that the AOPDDR detection capability is not affected between the fields
of view of these units.
When a test piece is placed on the boundary between the detection zone and the tolerance
zone (i.e. on the border of the detection zone) the measured distance values of this test piece
shall be the median point of the distribution of measurement values determined using a test
piece with a reflectivity of any value from that of the "black" test piece to that of the "white" test
piece. The supplier shall document the reflectivity of the test piece and the calculations used.
This requirement may be verified by inspection of the supplier's documentation.
NOTE 4 The value for the ranging accuracy and the tolerance zone is not necessarily a constant. It can, for
example, be a function of the measurement distance.
a b
– 14 – 61496-3 © IEC:2008
NOTE 5 If the AOPDDR has a facility to automatically set its detection zone(s), the ranging error of the set values
is taken into account when determining the tolerance zone (see Clause A.11).
NOTE 6 Annex BB gives additional information about the relationship between ranging accuracy and probability of
detection.
4.2.12.3 Scanning geometry, scanning frequency and response time
The supplier shall specify the relevant parameters of the detection zone(s), including range and
scanning angle. The scanning geometry and/or scanning frequency shall be sufficient to ensure
that a test piece with a diameter of the specified minimum detectable object size is detected at
the maximum range of the detection zone(s). The supplier shall define values in the range of
30 mm to 200 mm as the minimum detectable object size of the AOPDDR. The minimum
detectable object size may be distance dependent.
NOTE 1 The restriction of the minimum detectable object size to the range of 30 mm to 200 mm is based on
current applications. Additional requirements may be necessary for AOPDDRs having detection capabilities outside
this range.
Objects of the minimum detectable size that are either stationary or moving within the detection
zone at any speed up to 1,6 m/s shall be detected by the ESPE within the specified response
time. The response time shall be determined by the supplier taking into account worst-case
conditions, especially for the scanning frequency and the movement of objects. Where the
supplier states that an AOPDDR can be used to detect objects moving at speeds greater than
1,6 m/s, the requirements shall be met at any speed up to and including the stated maximum
speed(s).
NOTE 2 The detection capability may be determined by the optical geometry of the AOPDDR so that one complete
beam will impinge on the specified test pieces in the maximum range of detection zone and tolerance zone for a
special design. In this case, the distance between the centre of two adjacent transmitter beams (except the first and
the last one) will not exceed half the diameter of the test pieces. For other designs, it can be more difficult to carry
out the verification according to 5.2.1.2 and 5.2.11, especially when movement of objects is taken into account, as
required above.
NOTE 3 An example for the calculation of the response time is given in Clause AA.5.
All points on a path projected from any point on the border of the detection zone to the
receiving element(s) of the AOPDDR shall be within the detection zone (see 4.2.12.2) or the
zone with limited detection capability (see 4.1.4).
4.2.13 Test pieces for type testing
4.2.13.1 General
The test pieces are part of the AOPDDR and shall therefore be provided by the supplier for use
in the type tests of Clause 5. They shall be marked with a type reference and identification of
the AOPDDR with which they are intended to be used.
The test pieces shall have a diameter equal to the maximum specified detection capability
(minimum diameter). Other diameters within the range of 30 mm to 200 mm may be required
for testing depending on the detection capability of the AOPDDR.
NOTE The minimum effective length of the test pieces has been selected for ease of use.
4.2.13.2 Black test piece
The black test piece shall be a cylinder with a minimum effective length of 0,3 m. The surface
of the test piece shall have a diffuse reflectance value in the range of 1,6 % to 2,0 % including
measurement accuracy, at the wavelength of the transmitter and under normal conditions. This
value shall be verified by measurement. Where this reflectance value is used for calculation,
the nominal value of 1,8 % shall be used.

61496-3 © IEC:2008 – 15 –
NOTE Figure 3 shows the results of an investigation to determine the reflectance of the black test piece
(performed by Berufsgenossenschaftliches Institut für Arbeitsschutz, 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany).

β*
2,5
2,0
1,5
1,0
0,5
780 790 800 809 819 832 846 857 867 881 895 906 917 931 946 W
1 2 3 4 5 6
IEC  037/08
Key
1 Black velvet MG 20/5
2 Black broad corduroy MG 0/5
3 Black plastic foam MG 0/5
4 Black gumboot MG 20/5
5 Black synthetic material MG 20/5
6 Black shoe leather MG 20/5
W Wavelength [nm]
β* Coefficient of diffuse reflection [%]
NOTE A measurement geometry (MG) of, for example, 0/5 is represented by an entrance angle of 0° and an
observation angle of 5°. The entrance angle characterizes the angular position of the tested material with respect to
the direction of the incident light. The observation angle is the angle by which the direction of the observation of the
tested material differs from the direction of the incident light.
Figure 3 – Minimum diffuse reflectivity of materials
4.2.13.3 White test piece
The white test piece shall be a cylinder with a minimum effective length of 0,3 m. The surface
of the test piece shall have a diffuse reflectance value in the range of 80 % to 90 % at the
wavelength of the transmitter.
4.2.13.4 Retro-reflective test piece
The retro-reflective test piece shall be a cylinder with a minimum effective length of 0,3 m. The
surface of the test piece shall be of retro-reflecting material. The material shall comply with the
requirements for retro-reflection of EN 471 class 2 or equivalent.

– 16 – 61496-3 © IEC:2008
–1
NOTE Table 5 of EN 471 defines the minimum coefficient of retro-reflection for class 2 material as 330 cd ⋅ lx ⋅
–2
m with an entrance angle of 5° and an observation angle of 0,2° (12').
4.2.14 Wavelength
AOPDDRs shall operate at a wavelength within the range of 820 nm to 946 nm.
NOTE This range of wavelengths is based on the present availability of components together with research which
shows it to be suitable for materials used as clothing.
4.2.15 Radiation intensity
The radiation intensity generated and emitted by the AO
...