Standard Practice for Prevention of Dermatitis in the Wet Metal Removal Fluid Environment

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Use of this practice is intended to reduce occupational dermatitis caused by exposure to the wet metal removal environment.  
5.2 Complaints of dermatitis conditions are often associated with exposures to metal removal fluid.  
5.3 Implementation of this practice and incorporation of metal removal fluid management program has the potential to reduce complaints of occupational dermatitis. Elements of an effective program include: understanding dermatitis and associated causes; prevention of dermatitis and exposure to metal removal fluids; appropriate product selection; good management of additives, microorganisms, and fluids; appropriate additive (including antimicrobial pesticides) selection and additive control; appropriate tool design and assessment; and control of metal removal fluid exposures, including aerosols.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice sets forth guidelines for reducing dermatitis caused by exposure to the wet metal removal environment. The scope of this practice does not include exposure to chemicals that enter the body through intact skin (cutaneous route), which has the potential to cause other toxic effects.  
1.2 This practice incorporates means and mechanisms to reduce dermal exposure to the wet metal removal environment and to control factors in the wet metal removal environment that have the potential to cause dermatitis.  
1.3 This practice focuses on employee exposure to the skin via contact and exposure to metal removal fluid (MRF).  
1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
30-Sep-2019

Relations

Effective Date
01-Oct-2019
Effective Date
01-Oct-2023
Effective Date
01-Sep-2020
Effective Date
15-Mar-2020
Effective Date
01-Jan-2020
Effective Date
01-Jan-2019
Effective Date
01-Feb-2018
Effective Date
01-Oct-2017
Effective Date
15-Oct-2015
Effective Date
01-Jul-2015
Effective Date
01-Dec-2014
Effective Date
01-May-2014
Effective Date
01-May-2014
Effective Date
15-Jan-2014
Effective Date
01-Jul-2013

Overview

ASTM E2693-19: Standard Practice for Prevention of Dermatitis in the Wet Metal Removal Fluid Environment provides comprehensive guidelines to help reduce the occurrence of occupational dermatitis among employees exposed to wet metal removal fluids (MRFs) in industrial and manufacturing environments. Developed by ASTM International, this standard outlines best practices for fluid management, workplace design, personal protective equipment (PPE), and employee training to minimize skin exposure and adverse health effects.

Occupational dermatitis is commonly associated with direct skin contact with MRFs or their contaminants. This standard addresses practical approaches for mitigating risks and supporting a safer, healthier workplace.

Key Topics

  • Understanding Dermatitis and Causes: The standard highlights the signs, types, and sources of occupational dermatitis, including irritant and allergic contact dermatitis caused by MRFs, additives, or contaminants.
  • Prevention Strategies: Guidance is provided on minimizing exposure to MRFs via good housekeeping practices, PPE selection, process controls, and engineering solutions.
  • Product and Additive Selection: Selecting appropriate metal removal fluids and additives is critical. The standard recommends using products with the least toxic properties and reviewing safety data sheets (SDS) for all materials.
  • Fluid Management Programs: Effective management of MRFs-through water treatment, concentration control, regular maintenance, and contamination prevention-is emphasized as the primary method for reducing dermatitis.
  • Machine and Tool Design: Recommendations extend to equipment design, ensuring machine enclosures, proper ventilation, mist collection, and maintenance reduce fluid aerosol generation and skin contact.
  • Safe Work Practices and PPE: The standard specifies the importance of clean workwear, regular laundering, use of suitable barrier creams, and, where feasible, gloves or other PPE.
  • Training and Assessment: Ongoing employee education, workplace assessment, and medical oversight are encouraged to support continuous improvement in dermatitis prevention.

Applications

ASTM E2693-19 is applicable to a variety of settings where wet metal removal processes take place, such as:

  • CNC machining, milling, drilling, grinding, and turning operations
  • Automotive, aerospace, metal fabrication, and general manufacturing environments
  • Maintenance operations where metal removal fluids are used
  • Facilities implementing ISO 9001 or other quality/process control systems

Key practical uses of the standard include:

  • Designing and implementing comprehensive metal removal fluid management programs to reduce dermatological risks.
  • Selecting and maintaining machines and controls that minimize operator exposure to fluid aerosols.
  • Supporting occupational health and safety initiatives to comply with regulatory requirements and reduce worker compensation claims related to skin disorders.
  • Training employees in best practices for hygiene, PPE use, and early reporting of skin symptoms.
  • Integrating with broader risk management and quality control policies.

Related Standards

Organizations implementing ASTM E2693-19 will benefit from referencing related standards, which provide complementary guidance and testing protocols:

  • ASTM E1497: Selection and Safe Use of Water-Miscible and Straight Oil Metal Removal Fluids
  • ASTM E2169: Selecting Antimicrobial Pesticides for Use in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
  • ASTM E2889: Control of Respiratory Hazards in the Metal Removal Fluid Environment
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910: Personal Protective Equipment, Hand Protection, Hazard Communication
  • ANSI B11 TR 2–1997: Mist Control Considerations for Machine Tools Using Metalworking Fluids

By following the guidelines in ASTM E2693-19 and supporting standards, organizations can create safer metalworking environments, minimize occupational dermatitis, and ensure regulatory compliance, contributing to worker well-being and operational efficiency. For further guidance, consult your MRF supplier, corporate EHS specialists, or relevant industry resources.

Buy Documents

Standard

ASTM E2693-19 - Standard Practice for Prevention of Dermatitis in the Wet Metal Removal Fluid Environment

English language (10 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off
Standard

REDLINE ASTM E2693-19 - Standard Practice for Prevention of Dermatitis in the Wet Metal Removal Fluid Environment

English language (10 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

BSI Group

BSI (British Standards Institution) is the business standards company that helps organizations make excellence a habit.

UKAS United Kingdom Verified

Bureau Veritas

Bureau Veritas is a world leader in laboratory testing, inspection and certification services.

COFRAC France Verified

DNV

DNV is an independent assurance and risk management provider.

NA Norway Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

ASTM E2693-19 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Practice for Prevention of Dermatitis in the Wet Metal Removal Fluid Environment". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Use of this practice is intended to reduce occupational dermatitis caused by exposure to the wet metal removal environment. 5.2 Complaints of dermatitis conditions are often associated with exposures to metal removal fluid. 5.3 Implementation of this practice and incorporation of metal removal fluid management program has the potential to reduce complaints of occupational dermatitis. Elements of an effective program include: understanding dermatitis and associated causes; prevention of dermatitis and exposure to metal removal fluids; appropriate product selection; good management of additives, microorganisms, and fluids; appropriate additive (including antimicrobial pesticides) selection and additive control; appropriate tool design and assessment; and control of metal removal fluid exposures, including aerosols. SCOPE 1.1 This practice sets forth guidelines for reducing dermatitis caused by exposure to the wet metal removal environment. The scope of this practice does not include exposure to chemicals that enter the body through intact skin (cutaneous route), which has the potential to cause other toxic effects. 1.2 This practice incorporates means and mechanisms to reduce dermal exposure to the wet metal removal environment and to control factors in the wet metal removal environment that have the potential to cause dermatitis. 1.3 This practice focuses on employee exposure to the skin via contact and exposure to metal removal fluid (MRF). 1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Use of this practice is intended to reduce occupational dermatitis caused by exposure to the wet metal removal environment. 5.2 Complaints of dermatitis conditions are often associated with exposures to metal removal fluid. 5.3 Implementation of this practice and incorporation of metal removal fluid management program has the potential to reduce complaints of occupational dermatitis. Elements of an effective program include: understanding dermatitis and associated causes; prevention of dermatitis and exposure to metal removal fluids; appropriate product selection; good management of additives, microorganisms, and fluids; appropriate additive (including antimicrobial pesticides) selection and additive control; appropriate tool design and assessment; and control of metal removal fluid exposures, including aerosols. SCOPE 1.1 This practice sets forth guidelines for reducing dermatitis caused by exposure to the wet metal removal environment. The scope of this practice does not include exposure to chemicals that enter the body through intact skin (cutaneous route), which has the potential to cause other toxic effects. 1.2 This practice incorporates means and mechanisms to reduce dermal exposure to the wet metal removal environment and to control factors in the wet metal removal environment that have the potential to cause dermatitis. 1.3 This practice focuses on employee exposure to the skin via contact and exposure to metal removal fluid (MRF). 1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

ASTM E2693-19 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 13.100 - Occupational safety. Industrial hygiene; 75.100 - Lubricants, industrial oils and related products. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ASTM E2693-19 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM E2693-14, ASTM E2889-23, ASTM D1356-20a, ASTM D1356-20, ASTM E1542-20, ASTM D2881-19, ASTM E1542-18, ASTM E2889-12(2017), ASTM D1356-15a, ASTM D1356-15, ASTM D1356-14b, ASTM D2881-12(2014), ASTM D1356-14a, ASTM D1356-14, ASTM E1302-13. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ASTM E2693-19 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: E2693 − 19 An American National Standard
Standard Practice for
Prevention of Dermatitis in the Wet Metal Removal Fluid
Environment
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2693; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope* D2881 Classification for Metalworking Fluids and Related
Materials
1.1 This practice sets forth guidelines for reducing derma-
E1302 Guide for Acute Animal Toxicity Testing of Water-
titiscausedbyexposuretothewetmetalremovalenvironment.
Miscible Metalworking Fluids
The scope of this practice does not include exposure to
E1497 Practice for Selection and Safe Use of Water-
chemicals that enter the body through intact skin (cutaneous
Miscible and Straight Oil Metal Removal Fluids
route), which has the potential to cause other toxic effects.
E1542 Terminology Relating to Occupational Health and
1.2 This practice incorporates means and mechanisms to
Safety
reduce dermal exposure to the wet metal removal environment
E1972 Practice for Minimizing Effects of Aerosols in the
and to control factors in the wet metal removal environment 3
Wet Metal Removal Environment (Withdrawn 2017)
that have the potential to cause dermatitis.
E2148 GuideforUsingDocumentsRelatedtoMetalworking
1.3 This practice focuses on employee exposure to the skin or Metal Removal Fluid Health and Safety
via contact and exposure to metal removal fluid (MRF).
E2169 Practice for Selecting Antimicrobial Pesticides for
Use in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded
E2525 Test Method for Evaluation of the Effect of Nanopar-
as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
ticulate Materials on the Formation of Mouse
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colonies
and are not considered standard.
E2889 Practice for Control of Respiratory Hazards in the
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the
Metal Removal Fluid Environment
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
2.2 OSHA Standards:
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
29 CFR 1910.132 Personal Protective Equipment: General
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
Requirements
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
29 CFR 1910.133 Eye and Face Protection
1.6 This international standard was developed in accor-
29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory Protection
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
29 CFR 1910.138 Hand Protection
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
29 CFR 1910.1048 Formaldehyde
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
29 CFR 1910.1200 Hazard Communication
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
29 CFR 1910 Appendix B to Subpart I Non-Mandatory
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Compliance Guidelines for Hazard Assessment and Per-
2. Referenced Documents
sonal Protective Equipment Selection
2.1 ASTM Standards:
2.3 Other Document:
D1356 Terminology Relating to Sampling and Analysis of
ANSI B11 TR 2–1997 Mist Control Considerations for the
Atmospheres
Design, Installation and Use of Machine Tools Using
Metalworking Fluids
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E34 on Occupa-
tional Health and Safety and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E34.50 on
Health and Safety Standards for Metal Working Fluids.
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2019. Published October 2019. Originally The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
approved in 2009. Last previous edition approved in 2014 as E2693 – 14. DOI: www.astm.org.
10.1520/E2693-19. AvailablefromU.S.GovernmentPrintingOfficeSuperintendentofDocuments,
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or 732 N. Capitol St., NW, Mail Stop: SDE, Washington, DC 20401, http://
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM www.access.gpo.gov.
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Available fromAmerican National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,
the ASTM website. 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E2693 − 19
3. Terminology substances including, but not limited to: abrasive particles,
tramp oils, cleaners, dirt, metal fines and shavings, dissolved
3.1 For definitions and terms relating to this practice, refer
metal and hard water salts, bacteria, fungi, microbiological
to Terminologies D1356 and E1542.
decay products, and waste. These contaminants can cause
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
changes in the lubricity and cooling ability of the metal
3.2.1 contaminant, n—substances contained in in-use metal
removal fluid as well as have the potential to adversely affect
removal fluids that are not part of the received fluid, such as
the health and welfare of employees in contact with the
abrasive particles, tramp oils, cleaners, dirt, metal fines and
contaminated metal removal fluid. E2148
shavings, dissolved metal and hard water salts, bacteria, fungi,
3.2.10 metal removal fluid aerosol, n—aerosol generated by
micro biological decay products, and waste. E1497
operation of the machine tool itself as well as from circulation
3.2.2 control, v—to prevent, eliminate, or reduce hazards
and filtration systems associated with wet metal removal
related to use of metal removal fluids in metal removal
operations and can include airborne contaminants of a micro-
processes and to provide appropriate supplemental or interim
bial origin. E1972
protection, or both, as necessary, to employees. E1497
3.2.10.1 Discussion—Metal removal fluid aerosol does not
3.2.3 dermatitis, n—an inflammatory response of the skin.
include background aerosol in the workplace atmosphere,
3.2.3.1 Discussion—Dermatitis can result from a wide va- which can include suspended insoluble particulate. E2525
riety of sources and processes. The most common origins are
3.2.11 metal removal process, n—a manufacturing process
irritant or allergic responses to a chemical or physical agent.
that removes metal during shaping of a part, including machin-
Signs and symptoms that typify the initial onset of dermatitis
ing processes such as milling, drilling, turning, broaching, and
include: erythema (redness); edema (swelling); pruritis (itch-
tapping, and grinding processes, as well as honing and lapping,
ing); and vesiculation (pimple-like eruptions). In more severe
and other similar mechanical operations in which metal is
cases, fissures (deep cracks) and ulcers (open sores) can
removed to produce a finished part.
develop. The condition is usually reversible when exposure to
3.2.12 total particulate matter, n—the mass of material
the causative agent ceases. More severe cases can require more
sampled through the 4-mm inlet of a standard 37-mm filter
time and some medical attention. Some individuals can be at
cassette when operated at 2.0 L/min, as described in Test
higher risk. E2525
Method PS 42.
3.2.4 dilution ventilation, n—referring to the supply and
3.2.12.1 Discussion—As defined in Test Method PS 42,
exhaust of air with respect to an area, room, or building, the
total particulate matter is not a measure of the inhalable or
dilution of contaminated air with uncontaminated air for the
thoracic particulate mass.
purpose of controlling potential health hazards, fire and explo-
3.2.13 tramp oil, n—oil and oil-soluble additives, some-
sion conditions, odors, and nuisance-type contaminants, from
6 times insoluble, resulting from leaking hydraulic or gear oil, or
Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice.
sacrificial spindle oil or slide way lubricant, that contaminate
3.2.5 emergency, n—any occurrence, such as but not limited
the metal removal fluid. E1497
to equipment failure, rupture of containers, or failure of control
3.2.13.1 Discussion—Tramp oils can contaminate the metal
equipment that results in an uncontrolled release of a signifi-
removal fluid with components that are emulsifiable but which
cant amount of metal removal fluid. E1497
were not part of the metal removal fluid as formulated. E2525
3.2.6 employee exposure, n—contactwiththemetalremoval
3.2.14 wet metal removal fluid environment, n—the work-
fluid, components, and contaminants by inhalation, skin
place environment in which wet metalworking operations
contact, eye contact, or accidental ingestion.
occur. E1497
3.2.7 extractable mass, n—the material removed by liquid
4. Routes of Metal Removal Fluid Exposure and Effects
extraction of the sampling filter using a mixed-polarity solvent
of Overexposure
mixture as described in Test Method PS 42.
4.1 Routes of exposure to metal removal fluids include
3.2.8 folliculitis, n—an inflammatory response to excess oil
in hair follicles. E1497 inhalation, ingestion, eye contact, and dermal contact. This
practice focuses on exposure through dermal contact with the
3.2.9 metal removal fluid (MRF), n—any fluid in the sub-
fluid, contact with residual fluid on machinery, parts, or
classofmetalworkingfluidsusedtocutorotherwisetakeaway
clothing, and in some cases contact with fluid mists, splashes,
material or piece of stock. E2148
or aerosols. Refer to Practice E2889 for information about the
3.2.9.1 Discussion—Metalremovalfluidsincludestraightor
healthrisksrelatedtoinhalationexposureandguidanceonhow
neat oils (Classification D2881), not intended for further
to reduce these risks.
dilution with water, and water-miscible soluble oils,
semisynthetics,andsynthetics,whichareintendedtobediluted 4.2 Prolonged or repeated dermal contact can cause dry and
with water before use. Metal removal fluids become contami-
cracked skin, rash, redness, burning, or itching. Skin abrasions
nated during use in the workplace with a variety of workplace
can intensify the effects. Some metal removal fluids and
additives can sensitize the skin of affected employees, which
can result in a response to very low levels of exposure. This
Available from American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists,
practice defines dermatitis as an inflammatory response to the
Inc. (ACGIH), 1330 Kemper Meadow Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45240, http://
www.acgih.org. skin. Dermatitis can result from a wide variety of sources and
E2693 − 19
processes. The most common origins are irritant or allergic 6.2.16 Skin infections,
responsestoachemicalorphysicalagent.Signsandsymptoms 6.2.17 Skin burns,
that typify the initial onset of dermatitis include: erythema 6.2.18 Skin microtrauma and mechanical injury, and
(redness);edema(swelling);pruritis(itching);andvesiculation 6.2.19 Itchy nummular dermatitis.
(pimple-like eruptions). In more severe cases, fissures (deep
6.3 Dermatitis resulting from exposure to metal removal
cracks) and ulcers (open sores) can develop. The condition is
fluids is usually either irritant contact dermatitis or allergic
usuallyreversiblewhenexposuretothecausativeagentceases.
contact dermatitis.
More severe cases can require more time and some medical
6.4 Irritant contact dermatitis can be caused by two
attention.
mechanisms, chemical and physical abrasion. Examples of a
4.3 Aerosols, mist, and vapors can contact and expose the
chemical mechanism include metal removal fluid concentrates,
skin as well as contaminate clothing.
higher than recommended in-use metal removal fluid
concentrations, high alkalinity, and solvents. Examples of
5. Significance and Use
physical abrasion include exposure to physical irritants such as
5.1 Use of this practice is intended to reduce occupational
metal shavings, turnings, or fines contained in the fluid from a
dermatitis caused by exposure to the wet metal removal
malfunctioning filter; fines in dirty shop rags; and hand
environment.
washing with abrasive soaps.
5.2 Complaints of dermatitis conditions are often associated
6.5 Allergiccontactdermatitiscanbecausedbyexposureof
with exposures to metal removal fluid.
sensitive individuals to certain metal contaminants (for
example, chromium, cobalt, or nickel) dissolved or suspended
5.3 Implementation of this practice and incorporation of
in the metal removal fluid, or to certain ingredients, including
metal removal fluid management program has the potential to
some antimicrobials or odorants. Some workers are sensitized
reduce complaints of occupational dermatitis. Elements of an
to contaminants.
effective program include: understanding dermatitis and asso-
ciated causes; prevention of dermatitis and exposure to metal
6.6 Microorganisms can grow in all metal removal fluids,
removal fluids; appropriate product selection; good manage-
often producing an unpleasant odor. Unless open cuts, wounds,
ment of additives, microorganisms, and fluids; appropriate
orseveredermatitisarealreadypresent,microorganismswhich
additive (including antimicrobial pesticides) selection and
commonly grow in water-miscible metal removal fluids are not
additive control; appropriate tool design and assessment; and
frank pathogens and are not normally associated with onset of
control of metal removal fluid exposures, including aerosols.
dermatitis.
6.7 The greater the concentration or duration of exposure to
6. Dermatitis and Associated Causes
an irritant, the greater the possibility for skin irritation to
6.1 Dermatitis can result from a wide variety of sources and
develop or for skin sensitization to develop in sensitive
processes. The most common origins are irritant or allergic
individuals.
responsestoachemicalorphysicalagent.Signsandsymptoms
6.8 Consider activities outside work, such as gardening,
that typify the initial onset of dermatitis include: erythema
painting,orcarrepair,whichcancontributetodermatitis,when
(redness);edema(swelling);pruritis(itching);andvesiculation
investigating potential dermatitis causes.
(pimple-like eruptions). In more severe cases, fissures (deep
6.9 Anymaterialoractivitythatabradestheskinorremoves
cracks) and ulcers (open sores) can develop. The condition is
natural oils from skin can cause dermatitis or predispose skin
usuallyreversiblewhenexposuretothecausativeagentceases.
to its onset. Environmental factors such as dry air, extreme
More severe cases can require more time and some medical
cold, and changing humidity, or idiopathic factors, such as
attention.
normal aging, can also predispose the skin to dermatitis.
6.2 Some examples of occupational dermatitis include:
6.10 Folliculitis (oil acne) can be caused by use of straight
6.2.1 Irritant contact dermatitis (from irritant chemicals or
physical irritants), oils without proper skin protection.
6.2.2 Allergic contact dermatitis,
6.11 Finding the cause of a worker’s case of dermatitis can
6.2.3 Folliculitis (oil acne),
be a long, laborious process. Detecting an occupational dermal
6.2.4 Dyshydrotic eczema,
causativeagentrequirescooperationfromthepatient,themetal
6.2.5 Keratoses,
removal fluid manufacturer, workplace management, and spe-
6.2.6 Eczema,
cialized medical expertise.
6.2.7 Skin warts,
6.12 Poor personal hygiene both on and off the job can
6.2.8 Pigment disorders,
influence development of dermatitis.
6.2.9 Granuloma,
6.2.10 Erythematous papules, 6.13 Dermatitis causation varies with worker population
6.2.11 Papulovesicles, demographics.Thefrequencyofexposure,theconcentrationof
6.2.12 Chronic lichenified, exposure, a person’s predisposition to specific dermatitis, etc.
6.2.13 Fisssured palmar eczema, with metal removal fluids all influence the outcome if derma-
6.2.14 Discoid eczema, titis will develop. Occupational dermatitis exposure focuses on
6.2.15 Psoriasis, the hands, especially on the dorsal part of the hands as well as
E2693 − 19
the bony prominences, the lateral sides of the fingers, and other hand, small systems can get out of control with
finger webs where fluids tend to be retained if hands are not haphazard, inappropriate, or poorly timed additions and dilu-
cleansed properly tions. A systems approach to metal removal process manage-
mentisrecommendedandincludessomeorallofthefollowing
6.14 Occupational dermatitis has sometimes been associ-
program elements:
ated with exposure to as-received metal removal fluid concen-
7.1.1 Water treatment (Section 8),
trates as well as to in-use metal removal fluids.
7.1.2 Product selection (Section 9),
6.14.1 Lack of management of and maintenance of metal
7.1.3 Additive selection and control (Section 10),
removal fluid systems is the most significant contributor to
7.1.4 Machinetooldesign,selection,andmaintenance(Sec-
occupational dermatitis associated with exposure to metal
tion 11),
removal fluids.
7.1.5 Work layout and design (Section 12),
6.14.2 Excess tramp oil, which can carry metallic fines, can
7.1.6 Safe work practices and PPE (Section 13),
cause dermatitis due to mechanical abrasion of the skin with
7.1.7 Assessment (Section 14),
the carried fines.
7.1.8 Process control (Section 15),
6.14.3 Water-miscible metal removal fluids that are not
7.1.9 Education and training (Section 16),
carefully controlled for concentration or which contain higher
7.1.10 Medical, industrial hygiene, and administrative con-
than recommended concentrations of additives can be much
trols (Section 17), and
more irritating than fluids that are operating at the manufac-
7.1.11 Emergency preparedness (Section 18).
turer’s recommended concentration.
6.14.4 Malfunctioning or insufficient filters can increase 7.2 Metal removal fluid management programs can be
easily integrated with process control requirements of quality
suspended particulate, such as grinding turnings, abrasive
wheel residue, and metallic fines. systems such as ISO 9001 or QS–9000.
6.14.5 Contamination of the metal removal fluid by dis-
7.3 Additional detailed guidance is provided in Practices
solved metals, such as nickel, cobalt, and chromium, other
E1497 and E2889 and in Metal Removal Fluids, A Guide To
abrasive particulates, or alkaline materials, such as in-process
Their Management and Control, and in Metalworking Fluids:
cleaners, increase occurrences of occupational dermatitis.
Health & Safety Best Practices Manual. Consult with your
6.14.6 Causes of dermatitis associated with the metal re-
metal removal fluid suppliers.
moval environment include chemicals such as additives and
7.4 It is important that the management program include a
antimicrobial pesticides. Antimicrobial pesticides are often
continuous improvement plan to control for dermatitis.
incorporated into water-miscible metal removal fluid formula-
tions and are commonly added to machine sumps and to
8. Water Treatment
centralized water-miscible metal removal fluids to control
8.1 Water constitutes more than 90 % of the diluted water-
microbial growth. See Practice E2169 for further guidance.
miscible metal removal fluid mixture. Water shall be evaluated
Antimicrobial pesticides must be used in accordance with
for hardness, alkalinity, high conductivity, turbidity,
manufacturer’s label instructions. Some antimicrobial pesti-
corrosivity, biological contaminants, and other factors that can
cides are corrosive, and appropriate personal protective equip-
lead to increased use of metal removal fluid concentrate,
ment must be worn to prevent skin or eye injury. Other
additives, or antimicrobials, or a combination thereof. Good
antimicrobial pesticides, if overused, can cause allergic contact
water quality is fundamental to proper metal removal fluid use,
dermatitis.
will help reduce use of additives and antimicrobials, and
6.14.7 Examples of chemical causes of dermatitis include
lengthen fluid life. Consult your metal removal fluid supplier,
agents such as 1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane, triazine, metal
chemical manager, and corporate subject matter expert.
filings, strong detergents in hand washing, para-
8.2 Where suitable water is not available, use a water
phenylenediamine, formaldehyde, neomycin, thiuram,
treatment program to produce enough water of sufficient
mercaptobenzothiazole, ethylenediamine, fragrances, and
quality for metal removal fluid use. Treated water needs to be
some antimicrobial pesticides. This is not an inclusive list.
readily available from holding tanks large enough to meet
Even metal removal fluids with similar alkalinity show differ-
anticipateddailyrequirements.Treatedwaterquality,including
ent irritant skin reactions due to their chemical components.
biological contaminants, must be monitored. Tests performed
Other potential agents include corrosion inhibitors, coupling
depend on the type of water treatment used. Guidance on water
agents, and emulsifiers. The type of fluid is important. For
quality and water treatment is often available from the metal
example, straight mineral oils can have higher levels of fines
removal fluid manufacturer.
than water-mix fluids.
9. Product Selection
7. Metal Removal Fluid Management Program
9.1 Proper product selection is fundamentally critical to
7.1 Management of metal removal fluids is the most impor-
reducing or eliminating respiratory conditions and occupa-
tant step in improving fluid life and reducing the occurrence of
tional dermatitis associated with exposure to metal removal
dermatitis and other occupational hazards. Health risks and
economic losses are enormous when large, centralized metal
Available from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 200
removal fluid systems get out of control compared to the effort
Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20210, or at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/
required to maintain control and chemical stability. On the metalworkingfluids/metalworkingfluids_manual.html.
E2693 − 19
fluids. The goal is for metal removal fluids to perform as selection, storage, dispensing, and maintenance, refer to Prac-
intended while providing the safest working conditions. The tices E1497 and E2169.
selection of a metal removal fluid for each different operation
9.7 Workers are not only exposed to components in these
must consider the inherent limitations of the product. Water-
metal removal fluids but also frequently to antimicrobial
miscible fluids not properly selected are likely to be used at
pesticides that have been implicated in occupational irritant
higher concentrations than other products more appropriate to
dermatitis.
the operation.
9.8 Fluids vary in their characteristics and chemical com-
9.1.1 Consult Metal Removal Fluids, A Guide to Their
Management and Control and Metal Working Fluid Optimiza- ponents as well as in their misting characteristics. Select fluids
with an understanding of their misting characteristics, bearing
tionGuide forfurtherinformationonselectingtheproperfluid
for the application. In addition, your fluid supplier, chemical in mind available engineering control measures. Some fluids
mist less, other factors being equal. Misting characteristics can
manager, or corporate subject matter expert could provide
information on the proper selection of the appropriate fluid and change significantly with contamination. Some fluids retain
entrained air, causing a significant increase in mist generation,
recommended concentration for use.
possibly in areas away from the metal removal fluid operation.
9.2 Potential health hazards can be reduced by careful fluid
Polymeric additives can be useful in reducing aerosol from
selection and substitution. See Guide E1302 and consult
straight or neat oils and some water-miscible metal removal
Metalworking Fluids: Safety and Health Best Practices
fluids. Components or contaminants can be more concentrated
Manual for further information.
in the aerosol phase relative to their concentrations in the bulk
9.3 Before the fluid is handled, the user shall have an
fluid.
accurate and current safety data sheet (SDS) as required by the
9.9 Practice E1497 and Metal Removal Fluids, A Guide To
OSHA Hazard Communication Standard. See 29 CFR
Their Management and Control describe product selection
1910.1200. Precautions shall be taken to ensure the fluid is,
criteria. While specifically directed towards water-miscible
without modification, the fluid represented in the SDS. The
metalworking fluids, the same principles generally apply to
metalremovalfluidmanufacturer’sSDSandtoxicologicaldata
selection of neat or straight metal removal fluids.
must be complete and must provide all applicable information
on metal removal fluids, ingredients, and additives, and this
9.10 Select fluids with an understanding of their acute and
data shall be reviewed in order to evaluate potential hazards
chronic toxicity characteristics. Guide E1302 references pro-
and establish appropriate control procedures.
cedures to assess the acute toxicity of water-miscible metal-
working fluids as manufactured. Review the SDS, required by
9.4 The metal removal fluid manufacturer must provide all
29 CFR 1910.1200, for health and safety information for the
applicable health, safety, and toxicological data on additives,
metal removal fluids being considered for the operation.
including rust inhibitors, product stabilizers, and antimicrobi-
als of all types, odorants, and dyes. These data shall be
9.11 With due consideration for available engineering
reviewedfortheirimpactonthemetalremovalfluidmixtureto
controls, select fluids that minimize components that can be
which they are added. Additives shall only be used with the
irritating or can produce objectionable odors.
agreement of the metalworking fluid manufacturer and the
9.12 As the concentration of metal removal fluid in the
appropriate health and safety personnel in the plant.
machining system sump or reservoir increases, the level of
9.5 As supplied, antimicrobials and other additives for
chemicals in the metal removal fluid aerosol increases and the
tank-side addition can present greater health and safety risks
netexposureisgreater.Maintainingpropermetalremovalfluid
than the metal removal fluid. Further, additives and antimicro-
concentration while in use enhances machining performance
bials are less likely to be handled automatically, or with special
and minimizes exposure potential.
delivery equipment, than metal removal fluid concentrate so
greater care and attention are required to reduce risks of 9.13 Select metal removal fluids with the least toxic mate-
exposure. rials.
9.5.1 To avoid recognized health and safety hazards, MRF
9.14 Select antimicrobial pesticides with the least toxic
formulations shall not contain nitrites or nitrosating agents,
materials. Ensure proper use of antimicrobial pesticides.
petroleum oils that are not severely refined, chlorinated paraf-
fins that have been identified as carcinogens, and other con- 9.15 Maintain machines and exhaust.
stituents listed in applica
...


This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: E2693 − 14 E2693 − 19 An American National Standard
Standard Practice for
Prevention of Dermatitis in the Wet Metal Removal Fluid
Environment
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2693; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope Scope*
1.1 This practice sets forth guidelines for reducing dermatitis caused by exposure to the wet metal removal environment. The
scope of this practice does not include exposure to chemicals that enter the body through intact skin (cutaneous route), which has
the potential to cause other toxic effects.
1.2 This practice incorporates means and mechanisms to reduce dermal exposure to the wet metal removal environment and to
control factors in the wet metal removal environment that have the potential to cause dermatitis.
1.3 This practice focuses on employee exposure to the skin via contact and exposure to metal removal fluid (MRF).
1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D1356 Terminology Relating to Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheres
D2881 Classification for Metalworking Fluids and Related Materials
E1302 Guide for Acute Animal Toxicity Testing of Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
E1370 Guide for Air Sampling Strategies for Worker and Workplace Protection
E1497 Practice for Selection and Safe Use of Water-Miscible and Straight Oil Metal Removal Fluids
E1542 Terminology Relating to Occupational Health and Safety
E1972 Practice for Minimizing Effects of Aerosols in the Wet Metal Removal Environment (Withdrawn 2017)
E2144 Practice for Personal Sampling and Analysis of Endotoxin in Metalworking Fluid Aerosols in Workplace Atmospheres
E2148 Guide for Using Documents Related to Metalworking or Metal Removal Fluid Health and Safety
E2169 Practice for Selecting Antimicrobial Pesticides for Use in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
E2250 Method for Determination of Endotoxin Concentration in Water Miscible Metal Working Fluids (Withdrawn 2008)
E2525 Test Method for Evaluation of the Effect of Nanoparticulate Materials on the Formation of Mouse Granulocyte-
Macrophage Colonies
E2889 Practice for Control of Respiratory Hazards in the Metal Removal Fluid Environment
2.2 OSHA Standards:
29 CFR 1910.132 Personal Protective Equipment: General Requirements
29 CFR 1910.133 Eye and Face Protection
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E34 on Occupational Health and Safety and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E34.50 on Health
and Safety Standards for Metal Working Fluids.
Current edition approved Sept. 1, 2014Oct. 1, 2019. Published September 2014October 2019. Originally approved in 2009. Last previous edition approved in 20092014
as E2693 – 09.14. DOI: 10.1520/E2693-14.10.1520/E2693-19.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on www.astm.org.
Available from U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, 732 N. Capitol St., NW, Mail Stop: SDE, Washington, DC 20401, http://
www.access.gpo.gov.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E2693 − 19
29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory Protection
29 CFR 1910.138 Hand Protection
29 CFR 1910.1048 Formaldehyde
29 CFR 1910.1200 Hazard Communication
29 CFR 1910 Appendix B to Subpart I Non-mandatoryNon-Mandatory Compliance Guidelines for Hazard Assessment and
Personal Protective Equipment Selection
2.3 Other Documents:Document:
ANSI B11 TR 2–1997 Mist Control Considerations for the Design, Installation and Use of Machine Tools Using Metalworking
Fluids
3. Terminology
3.1 For definitions and terms relating to this practice, refer to Terminology Standards Terminologies D1356 and E1542.
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 contaminant, n—substances contained in in-use metal removal fluids that are not part of the received fluid, such as
abrasive particles, tramp oils, cleaners, dirt, metal fines and shavings, dissolved metal and hard water salts, bacteria, fungi, micro
biological decay products, and waste. E1497
3.2.2 control, v—to prevent, eliminate, or reduce hazards related to use of metal removal fluids in metal removal processes and
to provide appropriate supplemental or interim protection, or both, as necessary, to employees. E1497
3.2.3 dermatitis, n—an inflammatory response of the skin.
3.2.3.1 Discussion—
Dermatitis can result from a wide variety of sources and processes. The most common origins are irritant or allergic responses to
a chemical or physical agent. Signs and symptoms that typify the initial onset of dermatitis include: erythema (redness); edema
(swelling); pruritis (itching); and vesiculation (pimple-like eruptions). In more severe cases, fissures (deep cracks) and ulcers (open
sores) can develop. The condition is usually reversible when exposure to the causative agent ceases. More severe cases can require
more time and some medical attention. Some individuals can be at higher risk. E2525
3.2.4 dilution ventilation, n—referring to the supply and exhaust of air with respect to an area, room, or building, the dilution
of contaminated air with uncontaminated air for the purpose of controlling potential health hazards, fire and explosion conditions,
odors, and nuisance type nuisance-type contaminants, from Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice.
3.2.5 emergency, n—any occurrence, such as but not limited to equipment failure, rupture of containers, or failure of control
equipment that results in an uncontrolled release of a significant amount of metal removal fluid. E1497
3.2.6 employee exposure, n—contact with the metal removal fluid, components, and contaminants by inhalation, skin contact,
eye contact, or accidental ingestion.
3.2.7 extractable mass, n—the material removed by liquid extraction of the sampling filter using a mixed-polarity solvent
mixture as described in Test Method PS 42.
3.2.8 folliculitis, n—an inflammatory response to excess oil in hair follicles. E1497
3.2.9 metal removal fluid (MRF), n—any fluid in the subclass of metalworking fluids used to cut or otherwise take away material
or piece of stock. E2148
3.2.9.1 Discussion—
Metal removal fluids include straight or neat oils (Classification D2881), not intended for further dilution with water, and
water-miscible soluble oils, semisynthetics, and synthetics, which are intended to be diluted with water before use. Metal removal
fluids become contaminated during use in the workplace with a variety of workplace substances including, but not limited to,to:
abrasive particles, tramp oils, cleaners, dirt, metal fines and shavings, dissolved metal and hard water salts, bacteria, fungi,
microbiological decay products, and waste. These contaminants can cause changes in the lubricity and cooling ability of the metal
removal fluid as well as have the potential to adversely affect the health and welfare of employees in contact with the contaminated
metal removal fluid. E2148
3.2.10 metal removal fluid aerosol, n—Aerosolaerosol generated by operation of the machine tool itself as well as from
circulation and filtration systems associated with wet metal removal operations and can include airborne contaminants of a
microbial origin. E1972
Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St., 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
Available from American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc. (ACGIH), 1330 Kemper Meadow Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45240, http://www.acgih.org.
E2693 − 19
3.2.10.1 Discussion—
Metal removal fluid aerosol does not include background aerosol in the workplace atmosphere, which can include suspended
insoluble particulate. E2525
3.2.11 metal removal process, n—a manufacturing process that removes metal during shaping of a part, including machining
processes,processes such as milling, drilling, turning, broaching, and tapping, and grinding processes, as well as honing and
lapping, and other similar mechanical operations in which metal is removed to produce a finished part.
3.2.12 total particulate matter, n—the mass of material sampled through the 4-mm inlet of a standard 37-mm filter cassette when
operated at 2.0 L/min, as described in Test Method PS 42.
3.2.12.1 Discussion—
As defined in Test Method PS 42, total particulate matter is not a measure of the inhalable or thoracic particulate mass.
3.2.13 tramp oil, n—oil and oil-soluble additives, sometimes insoluble, resulting from leaking hydraulic or gear oil, or sacrificial
spindle oil or slide way lubricant, that contaminate the metal removal fluid. E1497
3.2.13.1 Discussion—
Tramp oils can contaminate the metal removal fluid with components that are emulsifiable but which were not part of the metal
removal fluid as formulated. E2525
3.2.14 wet metal removal fluid environment, n—the workplace environment in which wet metalworking operations occur. E1497
4. Routes of Metal Removal Fluid Exposure and Effects of Overexposure
4.1 Routes of exposure to metal removal fluids include inhalation, ingestion, eye contact, and dermal contact. This practice
focuses on exposure through dermal contact with the fluid, contact with residual fluid on machinery, parts, or clothing, and in some
cases contact with fluid mists, splashes, or aerosols. Refer to Practice E2889 for information about the health risks related to
inhalation exposure and guidance on how to reduce these risks.
4.2 Prolonged or repeated dermal contact can cause dry and cracked skin, rash, redness, burning, or itching. Skin abrasions can
intensify the effects. Some metal removal fluids and additives can sensitize the skin of affected employees, which can result in a
response to very low levels of exposure. This practice defines dermatitis as an inflammatory response to the skin. Dermatitis can
result from a wide variety of sources and processes. The most common origins are irritant or allergic responses to a chemical or
physical agent. Signs and symptoms that typify the initial onset of dermatitis include: erythema (redness); edema (swelling);
pruritis (itching); and,and vesiculation (pimple-like eruptions). In more severe cases, fissures (deep cracks) and ulcers (open sores)
can develop. The condition is usually reversible when exposure to the causative agent ceases. More severe cases can require more
time and some medical attention.
4.3 Aerosols, mist, and vapors can contact and expose the skin as well as contaminate clothing.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 Use of this practice is intended to reduce occupational dermatitis caused by exposure to the wet metal removal environment.
5.2 Complaints of dermatitis conditions are often associated with exposures to metal removal fluid.
5.3 Implementation of this practice and incorporation of metal removal fluid management program has the potential to reduce
complaints of occupational dermatitis. Elements of an effective program include: understanding dermatitis and associated causes;
prevention of dermatitis and exposure to metal removal fluids; appropriate product selection; good management of additives,
microorganisms, and fluids; appropriate additive (including antimicrobial pesticides) selection and additive control; appropriate
tool design and assessmentassessment; and control of metal removal fluid exposures, including aerosols.
6. Dermatitis and Associated Causes
6.1 Discussion—Dermatitis can result from a wide variety of sources and processes. The most common origins are irritant or
allergic responses to a chemical or physical agent. Signs and symptoms that typify the initial onset of dermatitis include: erythema
(redness); edema (swelling); pruritis (itching); and,and vesiculation (pimple-like eruptions). In more severe cases, fissures (deep
cracks) and ulcers (open sores) can develop. The condition is usually reversible when exposure to the causative agent ceases. More
severe cases can require more time and some medical attention.
6.2 Some examples of occupational dermatitis include:
6.2.1 Irritant contact dermatitis (from irritant chemicals or physical irritants)irritants),
6.2.2 Allergic contact dermatitis,
E2693 − 19
6.2.3 Folliculitis (oil acne),
6.2.4 Dyshydrotic eczema,
6.2.5 Keratoses,
6.2.6 Eczema,
6.2.7 Skin warts,
6.2.8 Pigment disorders,
6.2.9 Granuloma,
6.2.10 Erythematous papules,
6.2.11 Papulovesicles,
6.2.12 Chronic lichenified,
6.2.13 Fisssured palmar eczema,
6.2.14 Discoid eczema,
6.2.15 Psoriasis,
6.2.16 Skin infections,
6.2.17 Skin burns,
6.2.18 Skin microtrauma and mechanical injury, and
6.2.19 Itchy nummular dermatitis.
6.3 Dermatitis resulting from exposure to metal removal fluids is usually either irritant contact dermatitis or allergic contact
dermatitis.
6.4 Irritant contact dermatitis can be caused by two mechanisms, chemical and physical abrasion. Examples of a chemical
mechanism include metal removal fluid concentrates, higher than recommended in-use metal removal fluid concentrations, high
alkalinity, and solvents. Examples of physical abrasion include exposure to physical irritants such as metal shavings, turnings, or
fines contained in the fluid from a malfunctioning filter; fines in dirty shop rags; and hand washing with abrasive soaps.
6.5 Allergic contact dermatitis can be caused by exposure of sensitive individuals to certain metal contaminants (for example,
chromium, cobalt, or nickel) dissolved or suspended in the metal removal fluid, or to certain ingredients, including some
antimicrobials or odorants. Some workers are sensitized to contaminants.
6.6 Microorganisms can grow in all metal removal fluids, often producing an unpleasant odor. Unless open cuts, wounds, or
severe dermatitis are already present, microorganisms which commonly grow in water miscible water-miscible metal removal
fluids are not frank pathogens and are not normally associated with onset of dermatitis.
6.7 The greater the concentration or duration of exposure to an irritant, the greater the possibility for skin irritation to develop
or for skin sensitization to develop in sensitive individuals.
6.8 Consider activities outside work, such as gardening, painting, or car repair, which can contribute to dermatitis, when
investigating potential dermatitis causes.
6.9 Any material or activity that abrades the skin or removes natural oils from skin can cause dermatitis or predispose skin to
its onset. Environmental factors such as dry air, extreme cold, and changing humidity, or idiopathic factors, such as normal aging,
can also predispose the skin to dermatitis.
6.10 Folliculitis (oil acne) can be caused by use of straight oils without proper skin protection.
6.11 Finding the cause of a worker’s case of dermatitis can be a long, laborious process. Detecting an occupational dermal
causative agent requires cooperation from the patient, the metal removal fluid manufacturer, workplace management, and
specialized medical expertise.
6.12 Poor personal hygiene both on and off the job can influence development of dermatitis.
6.13 Dermatitis causation varies with worker population demographics. The frequency of exposure, the concentration of
exposure, a person’s predisposition to specific dermatitis, etc. with metal removal fluids all influence the outcome if dermatitis will
develop. Occupational dermatitis exposure focuses on the hands, especially on the dorsal part of the hands as well as the bony
prominences, the lateral sides of the fingers, and finger webs where fluids tend to be retained if hands are not cleansed properly
6.14 Occupational dermatitis has sometimes been associated with exposure to as-received metal removal fluid concentrates as
well as to in-use metal removal fluids.
6.14.1 Lack of management of and maintenance of metal removal fluid systems is the most significant contributor to
occupational dermatitis associated with exposure to metal removal fluids.
6.14.2 Excess tramp oil, which can carry metallic fines, can cause dermatitis,dermatitis due to mechanical abrasion of the skin
with the carried fines.
6.14.3 Water-miscible metal removal fluids that are not carefully controlled for concentration or which contain higher than
recommended concentrations of additives can be much more irritating than fluids that are operating at the manufacturer’s
recommended concentration.
E2693 − 19
6.14.4 Malfunctioning or insufficient filters can increase suspended particulate, such as grinding turnings, abrasive wheel
residue, and metallic fines.
6.14.5 Contamination of the metal removal fluid by dissolved metals, such as nickel, cobalt, and chromium, other abrasive
particulates, or alkaline materials, such as in-process cleaners, increase occurrences of occupational dermatitis.
6.14.6 Causes of dermatitis associated with the metal removal environment include chemicals such as additives and
antimicrobial pesticides. Antimicrobial pesticides are often incorporated into water-miscible metal removal fluid formulations and
are commonly added to machine sumps and to centralized water-miscible metal removal fluids to control microbial growth. See
Practice E2169 for further guidance. Antimicrobial pesticides must be used in accordance with manufacturer’s label instructions.
Some antimicrobial pesticides are corrosive, and appropriate personal protective equipment must be worn to prevent skin or eye
injury. Other antimicrobial pesticides, if over used, overused, can cause allergic contact dermatitis.
6.14.7 Examples of chemical causes of dermatitis include agents such as 1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane, triazine, metal filings,
strong detergents in hand washing, para-phenylenediamine, formaldehyde, neomycin, thiuram, mercaptobenzothiazole,
ethylenediamine, fragrances, and some antimicrobial pesticides. This is not an inclusive list. Even metal removal fluids with similar
alkalinity show different irritant skin reactions due to their chemical components. Other potential agents include corrosion
inhibitors, coupling agents, and emulsifiers. The type of fluid is important. For example, straight mineral oils can have higher levels
of fines than water-mix fluids.
7. Metal Removal Fluid Management Program
7.1 Management of metal removal fluids is the most important step in improving fluid life and reducing the occurrence of
dermatitis and other occupational hazards. Health risks and economic losses are enormous when large, centralized metal removal
fluid systems get out of control compared to the effort required to maintain control and chemical stability. On the other hand, small
systems can get out of control with haphazard, inappropriate, or poorly timed additions and dilutions. A systems approach to metal
removal process management is recommended and includes some or all of the following program elements:
7.1.1 Water treatment (Section 8),
7.1.2 Product selection (Section 9),
7.1.3 Additive selection and control (Section 10),
7.1.4 Machine tool design, selection, and maintenance (Section 11),
7.1.5 Work layout and design (Section 12),
7.1.6 Safe work practices and PPE (Section 13),
7.1.7 Assessment (Section 14),
7.1.8 Process control (Section 15),
7.1.9 Education and training (Section 16),
7.1.10 Medical, industrial hygiene, and administrative controls (Section 17), and
7.1.11 Emergency preparedness (Section 18).
7.2 Metal removal fluid management programs can be easily integrated with process control requirements of quality systems
such as ISO 9001 or QS–9000.
7.3 Additional detailed guidance is provided in Practices E1497 and E2889 and in Metal Removal Fluids, A Guide To Their
Management and Control, and in Metalworking Fluids: Health & Safety Best Practices Manual. Consult with your metal removal
fluid suppliers.
7.4 It is important that the management program include a continuous improvement plan to control for dermatitis.
8. Water Treatment
8.1 Water constitutes more than 90 % of the diluted water miscible water-miscible metal removal fluid mixture. Water shall be
evaluated for hardness, alkalinity, high conductivity, turbidity, corrosivity, biological contaminants, and other factors that can lead
to increased use of metal removal fluid concentrate, additives, or antimicrobials, or a combination thereof. Good water quality is
fundamental to proper metal removal fluid use, will help reduce use of additives and antimicrobials, and lengthen fluid life. Consult
your metal removal fluid supplier, chemical manager, and corporate subject matter expert.
8.2 Where suitable water is not available, use a water treatment program to produce enough water of sufficient quality for metal
removal fluid use. Treated water needs to be readily available from holding tanks large enough to meet anticipated daily
requirements. Treated water quality, including biological contaminants, must be monitored. Tests performed depend on the type
of water treatment used. Guidance on water quality and water treatment is often available from the metal removal fluid
manufacturer.
Available from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 200 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20210, or at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/
metalworkingfluids/metalworkingfluids_manual.html.
E2693 − 19
9. Product Selection
9.1 Proper product selection is fundamentally critical to reducing or eliminating respiratory conditions and occupational
dermatitis associated with exposure to metal removal fluids. The goal is for metal removal fluids to perform as intended while
providing the safest working conditions. The selection of a metal removal fluid for each different operation must consider the
inherent limitations of the product. Water-miscible fluids not properly selected are likely to be used at higher concentrations than
other products more appropriate to the operation.
9.1.1 Consult Metal Removal Fluids, A Guide to Their Management and Control and Metal Working Fluid Optimization Guide
for further information on selecting the proper fluid for the application. In addition, your fluid supplier, chemical manager, or
corporate subject matter expert could provide information on the proper selection of the appropriate fluid and recommended
concentration for use.
9.2 Potential health hazards can be reduced by careful fluid selection and substitution. See Guide E1302 and consult
Metalworking Fluids: Safety and Health Best Practices Manual for further information.
9.3 Before the fluid is handled, the user shall have an accurate and current material safety data sheet (SDS) as required by the
OSHA Hazard Communication Standard. See 29 CFR 1910.1200. Precautions shall be taken to ensure the fluid is, without
modification, the fluid represented in the material safety data sheet. SDS. The metal removal fluid manufacturer’s material safety
data sheet (MSDS) SDS and toxicological data must be complete and must provide all applicable information on metal removal
fluids, ingredients, and additives, and this data shall be reviewed in order to evaluate potential hazards and establish appropriate
control procedures.
9.4 The metal removal fluid manufacturer must provide all applicable health, safety, and toxicological data on Additives,
additives, including rust inhibitors, product stabilizers, and antimicrobials of all types, odorants, and dyes. These data shall be
reviewed for their impact on the metal removal fluid mixture to which they are added. Additives shall only be used with the
agreement of the metalworking fluid manufacturer and the appropriate health and safety personnel in the plant.
9.5 As supplied, antimicrobials and other additives for tank side tank-side addition can present greater health and safety risks
than the metal removal fluid. Further, additives and antimicrobials are less likely to be handled automatically, or with special
delivery equipment, than metal removal fluid concentrate so greater care and attention are required to reduce risks of exposure.
9.5.1 To avoid recognized health and safety hazards, MRF formulations shall not contain nitrites or nitrosating agents,
petroleum oils that are not severely refined, chlorinated paraffins that have been identified as carcinogens, and other constituents
listed in applicable purchase specifications.
9.5.2 All applicable disposal criteria must be met. If there is an on-site wastewater treatment plant, consult with the operator
at time of fluid selection.
9.6 For information on selection and safe use of metal removal fluids, additives, and antimicrobials including product selection,
storage, dispensing, and maintenance, refer to Practices E1497 and E2169.
9.7 Workers are not only exposed to components in these metal removal fluids but also frequently to antimicrobial pesticides
that have been implicated in occupational irritant dermatitis.
9.8 Fluids vary in their characteristics and chemical components as well as in their misting characteristics. Select fluids with
an understanding of their misting characteristics, bearing in mind available engineering control measures. Some fluids mist less,
other factors being equal. Misting characteristics can change significantly with contamination. Some fluids retain entrained air,
causing a significant increase in mist generation, possibly in areas away from the metal removal fluid operation. Polymeric
additives can be useful in reducing aerosol from straight or neat oils and some water-miscible metal removal fluids. Components
or contaminants can be more concentrated in the aerosol phase relative to their concentrations in the bulk fluid.
9.9 Practice E1497 and Metal Removal Fluids, A Guide To Their Management and Control describe product selection criteria.
While specifically directed towards water-miscible metalworking fluids, the same principles generally apply to selection of neat
or straight metal removal fluids.
9.10 Select fluids with an understanding of their acute and chronic toxicity characteristics. Guide E1302 references procedures
to assess the acute toxicity of water-miscible metalworking fluids as manufactured. Review the material safety data sheet, SDS,
required by 29 CFR 1910.1200, for health and safety information for the metal removal fluids being considered for the operation.
9.11 With due consideration for available engineering controls, select fluids that minimize components that can be irritating or
can produce objectio
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...