ISO/TS 14812:2022
(Main)Intelligent transport systems - Vocabulary
Intelligent transport systems - Vocabulary
This document defines terms relating to intelligent transport systems (ITS).
Systèmes de transport intelligents — Vocabulaire
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 28-Apr-2022
- Technical Committee
- ISO/TC 204 - Intelligent transport systems
- Drafting Committee
- ISO/TC 204/WG 1 - Architecture
- Current Stage
- 9599 - Withdrawal of International Standard
- Start Date
- 10-Jun-2025
- Completion Date
- 13-Dec-2025
Relations
- Effective Date
- 06-Jun-2022
Overview
ISO/TS 14812:2022 - Intelligent transport systems - Vocabulary is a technical specification that provides a comprehensive, standardized set of terms and definitions for the Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) domain. Published as the first edition in April 2022, the document establishes a consistent concept model and vocabulary to support interoperability, communication, documentation, and system engineering across ITS projects worldwide.
Key Topics
This vocabulary specification organizes ITS terminology into clearly defined categories, including:
- Core terms (entities, systems, architectures, time) - e.g., entity, system, transport system, surface transport system.
- Technology terms (physical objects, ITS stations, ITS applications) covering centre, field, personal and vehicle-related objects.
- Infrastructure terms (road components, junctions, separators, alternate-mode infrastructure).
- Location terms (location types and referencing).
- Service terms (generic services, ITS services, transport and shared-transport services, financial and contractual models).
- User and vehicle terms (traveller/occupant roles, vehicle components, attributes, automation, connectivity, speed and environment categories).
Additional features:
- Concept model diagrams in Annex A to illustrate term relationships.
- A bibliography and an alphabetical index of preferred, admitted, and deprecated terms.
- Notation that context-specific terms are indicated with bracketed context labels (for example, “<ITS‑S>”).
Practical applications
ISO/TS 14812:2022 is useful wherever precise ITS terminology is required:
- Standards development and harmonization - promotes consistent terminology across standards bodies and industry groups.
- System engineering and architecture - provides a common language for requirements, design, and verification of ITS architectures and interfaces.
- Procurement and contractual documents - reduces ambiguity in specifications and service agreements.
- Software and data modelling - supports ontologies, information models and data exchange formats by supplying agreed definitions.
- Policy, regulation and training - assists policymakers, regulators, and educators by clarifying key ITS concepts.
Who should use it
- ITS professionals, systems architects, and engineers
- Vehicle manufacturers and OEMs focusing on connectivity and automation
- Transport planners, operators and infrastructure owners
- Standards bodies, regulators and procurement teams
- Software developers working on ITS applications and data models
Related standards
- ISO online resources (ISO Online Browsing Platform) and IEC Electropedia are referenced for broader terminology alignment.
- ISO/TS 14812 complements other ITS and systems engineering standards (see ISO/IEC/IEEE references cited in the document).
Keywords: ISO/TS 14812:2022, Intelligent transport systems, ITS vocabulary, ITS terminology, transportation standards, interoperability, ITS definitions.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISO/TS 14812:2022 is a technical specification published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Its full title is "Intelligent transport systems - Vocabulary". This standard covers: This document defines terms relating to intelligent transport systems (ITS).
This document defines terms relating to intelligent transport systems (ITS).
ISO/TS 14812:2022 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 01.040.03 - Services. Company organization, management and quality. Administration. Transport. Sociology. (Vocabularies); 01.040.35 - Information technology (Vocabularies); 03.220.01 - Transport in general; 35.240.60 - IT applications in transport. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ISO/TS 14812:2022 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ISO/TS 14812:2025. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
You can purchase ISO/TS 14812:2022 directly from iTeh Standards. The document is available in PDF format and is delivered instantly after payment. Add the standard to your cart and complete the secure checkout process. iTeh Standards is an authorized distributor of ISO standards.
Standards Content (Sample)
TECHNICAL ISO/TS
SPECIFICATION 14812
First edition
2022-04
Intelligent transport systems —
Vocabulary
Systèmes de transport intelligents — Vocabulaire
Reference number
© ISO 2022
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii
Contents Page
Foreword .v
Introduction . vi
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
3.1 Core terms . 1
3.1.1 Entity terms . 1
3.1.2 General system terms . 2
3.1.3 General architecture terms . 3
3.1.4 Architecture view terms . 4
3.1.5 Architecture — Communication view terms . 5
3.1.6 Architecture — Enterprise view terms . 6
3.1.7 Architecture — Functional view terms . 7
3.1.8 Architecture — Physical view terms . 8
3.1.9 Architecture type terms . . 9
3.1.10 Data concept management terms . 10
3.1.11 Data concept type terms . 10
3.1.12 System engineering terms . 11
3.1.13 Time terms . 12
3.2 Technology terms . 12
3.2.1 Top-level physical object terms .12
3.2.2 Centre physical object terms . 13
3.2.3 Field physical object terms . 13
3.2.4 Personal physical object terms . 14
3.2.5 Support physical object terms . 15
3.2.6 Vehicle physical object terms . 15
3.2.7 ITS station terms . 16
3.2.8 ITS application terms . 17
3.2.9 ITS-S application process terms . 17
3.3 Infrastructure terms . . 18
3.3.1 Road reservation component terms . 18
3.3.2 Physical traffic separator terms . 22
3.3.3 Alternate mode infrastructure component terms .23
3.3.4 Infrastructure operating mode terms . 23
3.3.5 Road network terms. 24
3.3.6 Junction terms .25
3.4 Location terms . 26
3.4.1 Location type terms . 26
3.4.2 Location referencing terms . 27
3.5 Service terms .28
3.5.1 Generic service terms .28
3.5.2 Transport service terms .28
3.5.3 ITS service terms .29
3.5.4 ITS-S service terms .30
3.5.5 ITS-S communication service terms .30
3.5.6 Transport-related sharing terms .30
3.5.7 Contractual model terms . 31
3.5.8 Financial model terms . 32
3.5.9 Operational model terms . 33
3.5.10 Network model terms .34
3.5.11 Shared transport service terms .34
3.5.12 Shared vehicle terms . 35
3.5.13 Transport service application terms . 35
iii
3.6 User terms .36
3.6.1 Traveller terms . .36
3.6.2 Vehicle occupant terms . 37
3.7 Vehicle terms . 37
3.7.1 Vehicle component terms. 37
3.7.2 Vehicle attribute terms .38
3.7.3 Vehicle automation terms . 39
3.7.4 Vehicle connectivity terms . 42
3.7.5 Vehicle speed terms . 42
3.7.6 Vehicle types — environment terms .44
Annex A (informative) Concept model diagrams .45
Bibliography .81
Index .83
iv
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to
the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see
www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 204, Intelligent transport systems.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.
v
Introduction
The definitions found in this document have been formulated in accordance with major ISO
International Standards such as ISO 704 and are based on a consistent concept model. It is recognized
that the contents of this document are not exhaustive and that terminology evolves over time.
In most cases, the definitions provided within this document are suitable for general application
throughout intelligent transport systems (ITS). In those circumstances where a term is intended for a
specific domain of discourse or where the term can be used in multiple domains, the intended context is
indicated at the beginning of the definition as bracketed text (e.g. "").
In addition to a Bibliography, this document provides an index that provides an alphabetical listing of
all preferred, admitted, and deprecated terms contained in this document.
Other standardization groups and organizations are encouraged to adopt the terminology in this
document to promote better understanding of terms among ITS professionals worldwide. The terms
and definitions contained within this document can be searched online at ISO’s Online Browsing
Platform available at https://www.iso.org/obp.
vi
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ISO/TS 14812:2022(E)
Intelligent transport systems — Vocabulary
1 Scope
This document defines terms relating to intelligent transport systems (ITS).
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1 Core terms
3.1.1 Entity terms
NOTE Figure A.1 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.1.1
entity
concrete or abstract thing that exists, did exist, or can possibly exist, including associations among
these things
EXAMPLE Person (3.1.1.6), object, event, idea, process, etc.
3.1.1.2
immaterial entity
entity (3.1.1.1) that does not occupy three-dimensional space
EXAMPLE Idea, process, organization, etc.
3.1.1.3
material entity
entity (3.1.1.1) that occupies three-dimensional space
Note 1 to entry: All material entities have certain characteristics that can be described and therefore this concept
is important for ontology purposes.
3.1.1.4
non-biological entity
material entity (3.1.1.3) that is not and has never been a living organism
3.1.1.5
biological entity
material entity (3.1.1.3) that was or is a living organism
3.1.1.6
person
biological entity (3.1.1.5) that is a human being
3.1.2 General system terms
NOTE Figure A.2 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.2.1
system
combination of interacting elements (3.1.3.10) organized to achieve one or more stated purposes
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015, 4.1.46, modified — Notes to entry removed.]
3.1.2.2
transport system
system (3.1.2.1) of infrastructure elements (3.1.3.10) and optionally vehicles (3.7.1.1) that are jointly
designed to move material entities (3.1.1.3) from an origin to a destination
Note 1 to entry: Transport systems can also include any supporting system, such as information and control
systems.
3.1.2.3
surface transport system
transport system
transport system (3.1.2.2) designed to move material entities (3.1.1.3) across the surface or near-surface
of the Earth
Note 1 to entry: A surface transport system can include tunnels, bridges and similar elements (3.1.3.10).
Note 2 to entry: There is not complete agreement on the precise limitations of a "surface transport system" within
the ITS community. Currently, the term is almost exclusively applied to ground-based travel of goods and people
over significant distances. The term is viewed as including ferry systems, which often form an integral part of
a local surface transport system; it is less clear if it includes long-distance sea-fairing ships. The term "surface
transport systems" is also generally limited to transport systems that cover a considerable distance (e.g. factory
conveyance technologies are not often referred to as "surface transport systems"). It has been suggested that air
travel, which is arguably a transport system designed to move physical entities between points on the surface
of the earth, ought to be included in the scope of the term, but this perspective is not universally accepted. It is
expected that the exact limitations of the term will be further refined as ITS matures.
Note 3 to entry: Due to the defined scope of ITS, the term "transport system" is intended to be interpreted as
being synonymous with the term "surface transport system" unless explicitly specified otherwise.
3.1.2.4
intelligent transport system
ITS
intelligent transportation system
system (3.1.2.1) comprised of information, communication, sensor and control technologies and that is
designed to benefit a surface transport system (3.1.2.3)
Note 1 to entry: "Intelligent transportation system" is the American English equivalent.
Note 2 to entry: Benefits potentially include, but are not limited to, increased safety, sustainability, efficiency and
comfort.
Note 3 to entry: The full term (i.e. "intelligent transport system") is often used when the noun is used as a subject,
whereas the abbreviation (i.e. "ITS") is often used to modify another noun (e.g. "Intelligent transport systems
provide ITS services.").
3.1.2.5
cooperative ITS
C-ITS
subset of ITS (3.1.2.4) where information is shared among ITS stations (3.2.7.3) in a manner that enables
its use by multiple ITS services (3.5.3.1)
3.1.3 General architecture terms
NOTE Figure A.3 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.3.1
architecture
system architecture
fundamental concepts or properties of a system (3.1.2.1) in its environment (3.1.3.11) embodied
in its elements (3.1.3.10), relationships (3.1.6.8) and in the principles of its design and evolution
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011, 3.2]
3.1.3.2
architecture description
work product used to express an architecture (3.1.3.1)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011, 3.3]
3.1.3.3
architecture framework
conventions, principles and practices for the description of architectures (3.1.3.1) established within a
specific domain of application and/or community of stakeholders (3.1.3.4)
EXAMPLE 1 Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodologies (GERAM) [ISO 15704] is an
architecture framework.
EXAMPLE 2 Reference Model of Open Distributed Processing (RM-ODP) [ISO/IEC 10746] is an architecture
framework.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011, 3.4]
3.1.3.4
stakeholder
system stakeholder
individual, team, organization, or classes (3.1.12.2) thereof, having an interest in a system
(3.1.2.1)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011, 3.10]
3.1.3.5
concern
system concern
interest in a system (3.1.2.1) relevant to one or more of its stakeholders (3.1.3.4)
Note 1 to entry: A concern pertains to any influence on a system in its environment (3.1.3.11), including
developmental, technological, business, operational, organizational, political, economic, legal, regulatory,
ecological and social influences.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011, 3.7]
3.1.3.6
architecture viewpoint
work product establishing the conventions for the construction, interpretation and use of architecture
views (3.1.3.7) to frame specific system concerns (3.1.3.5)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011, 3.6]
3.1.3.7
architecture view
work product expressing the architecture (3.1.3.1) of a system (3.1.2.1) from the perspective of specific
system concerns (3.1.3.5)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011, 3.5]
3.1.3.8
model kind
conventions for a type of modelling
Note 1 to entry: Examples of model kinds include data flow (3.1.7.1) diagrams, class (3.1.11.2) diagrams, Petri
nets, balance sheets, organization charts and state transition models.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011, 3.9]
3.1.3.9
architecture model
work product representing one or more architecture views (3.1.3.7) and expressed in a format governed
by a model kind (3.1.3.8)
3.1.3.10
element
architecture element
component member of an architecture model (3.1.3.9) included in an architecture view
(3.1.3.7)
3.1.3.11
environment
system environment
context determining the setting and circumstances of all influences upon a system (3.1.2.1)
Note 1 to entry: The environment of a system includes developmental, technological, business, operational,
organizational, political, economic, legal, regulatory, ecological and social influences.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011, 3.8]
3.1.4 Architecture view terms
NOTE Figure A.4 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.4.1
communications view
architecture view (3.1.3.7) from the communications viewpoint (3.1.4.2)
Note 1 to entry: Within ITS, the preferred model for describing the communications view is based on the ITS-S
reference architecture (3.1.9.4).
3.1.4.2
communications viewpoint
architecture viewpoint (3.1.3.6) used to frame concerns (3.1.3.5) related to all layers of the Open Systems
Interconnection (OSI) stack and related management and security issues
3.1.4.3
enterprise view
architecture view (3.1.3.7) from the enterprise viewpoint (3.1.4.4)
3.1.4.4
enterprise viewpoint
architecture viewpoint (3.1.3.6) used to frame the policies, funding incentives, working arrangements
and jurisdictional structure that support the technical layers of the architecture (3.1.3.1)
3.1.4.5
functional view
architecture view (3.1.3.7) from the functional viewpoint (3.1.4.6)
3.1.4.6
functional viewpoint
architecture viewpoint (3.1.3.6) used to frame concerns (3.1.3.5) related to the definition of processes
(3.1.7.2) that perform surface transport functions and data flows (3.1.7.1) shared between these
processes
3.1.4.7
physical view
architecture view (3.1.3.7) from the physical viewpoint (3.1.4.8)
Note 1 to entry: The term "deployment view" is sometimes used within the broader ICT community, but the term
"physical view" is preferred to prevent confusion between the physical view of a reference architecture and any
part of a deployment architecture (3.1.9.3).
3.1.4.8
physical viewpoint
architecture viewpoint (3.1.3.6) used to frame concerns (3.1.3.5) related to the assignment of
functionality to physical objects (3.1.8.1) and the interfaces among these physical objects
3.1.5 Architecture — Communication view terms
NOTE Figure A.5 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.5.1
application entity
ITS-S application entity
DEPRECATED: information layer
part of the ITS station reference architecture (3.1.9.4) that is responsible for providing ITS-
related functionality
Note 1 to entry: Within the US, the National Transportation Communications for ITS Protocol (NTCIP) standards
identify an "information layer" on top of the traditional OSI stack. However, the purpose of this layer includes
both information configuration and functionality. The ITS-S reference architecture separates these two roles
between the management entity (3.1.5.6) and the application entity.
3.1.5.2
access layer
protocol layer that contains the OSI physical and data link layer protocols
3.1.5.3
ITS-S access layer
link layer
subnet layer
protocol layer in the ITS station reference architecture (3.1.9.4) containing the OSI physical and
data link layer protocols for ITS communications
Note 1 to entry: Within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the term "link layer" is used to describe the
same functionality as the ITS-S access layer.
Note 2 to entry: Within the US, the NTCIP standards use the term "subnet layer" to describe the same functionality
as the ITS-S access layer.
3.1.5.4
transnet layer
ITS-S networking and transport layer
networking and transport layer
protocol layer in the ITS station reference architecture (3.1.9.4) containing the OSI network and
transport layer protocols
Note 1 to entry: The full name of this layer is the networking and transport layer, but the term transnet layer
provides a more concise name.
3.1.5.5
facilities layer
ITS-S facilities layer
DEPRECATED: application layer
protocol layer in the ITS station reference architecture (3.1.9.4) containing the OSI session,
presentation and application layer protocols
Note 1 to entry: Within the US, the NTCIP standards call the facilities layer the "application layer". However,
as this term is easily confused with both the OSI application layer and the application entity (3.1.5.1), the term
should be avoided and qualified when used (e.g. OSI application layer).
3.1.5.6
management entity
ITS-S management entity
part of the ITS station reference architecture (3.1.9.4) that is responsible for management of
communications and configuration information for the local physical object (3.1.8.1) and possibly
remote physical objects
3.1.5.7
security entity
ITS-S security entity
part of the ITS station reference architecture (3.1.9.4) that is responsible for providing privacy,
communication security and system (3.1.2.1) security
3.1.6 Architecture — Enterprise view terms
NOTE Figure A.6 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.6.1
enterprise object
element (3.1.3.10) within an enterprise view (3.1.4.3) that represents an organization or individual
3.1.6.2
resource
enterprise view resource
element (3.1.3.10) that represents an entity (3.1.1.1) that is managed, operated,
referenced and/or used to develop and provide ITS (3.1.2.4)
3.1.6.3
document
uniquely identified unit of information for human use
EXAMPLE A report, specification, manual or book, in printed or electronic form.
Note 1 to entry: A document can be a single information item, or part of a larger information item.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 15289:2019, 3.1.10]
3.1.6.4
interaction
enterprise view interaction
element (3.1.3.10) that represents coordination between two enterprise objects
(3.1.6.1)
3.1.6.5
formal coordination
enterprise view formal coordination
interaction (3.1.6.4) between two enterprise objects (3.1.6.1) governed by a
documented agreement
EXAMPLE A road operator can enter into formal agreement(s) with the owner of a road (3.3.5.1) and the
owner(s) of the associated roadside (3.3.1.10) equipment.
3.1.6.6
informal coordination
enterprise view informal coordination
interaction (3.1.6.4) between two enterprise objects (3.1.6.1) governed by an
understanding that is not documented in a formal agreement between the two parties
3.1.6.7
role
enterprise view role
element (3.1.3.10) that represents the specified responsibilities between an
enterprise object (3.1.6.1) and another enterprise view (3.1.4.3) element
3.1.6.8
relationship
enterprise view relationship
element (3.1.3.10) that represents an association between two resources (3.1.6.2)
3.1.6.9
include
enterprise view include
relationship (3.1.6.8) where one resource (3.1.6.2) contains another resource
EXAMPLE Every ITS component includes one or more modules (3.1.8.7).
3.1.6.10
extend
enterprise view extend
relationship (3.1.6.8) where one resource (3.1.6.2) supplements another resource
EXAMPLE A module (3.1.8.7) can extend the functionality of another module.
3.1.7 Architecture — Functional view terms
NOTE Figure A.7 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.7.1
data flow
representation of data flowing between two processes (3.1.7.2) or between a process and a terminator
(3.1.8.3)
3.1.7.2
process
functional view process
series of one or more functions (3.1.7.3) in support of an ITS service (3.5.3.1)
3.1.7.3
function
functional view function
series of actions or activities performed by a given object to achieve a goal
Note 1 to entry: A function transforms inputs into outputs that may include the creation, modification, monitoring
or destruction of elements (3.1.3.10).
3.1.7.4
process specification
document (3.1.6.3) that defines a lowest-level process (3.1.7.2)
3.1.8 Architecture — Physical view terms
NOTE Figure A.8 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.8.1
physical object
ITS physical object
abstraction of a material entity (3.1.1.3) that interacts with other abstract material
entities in the provision of ITS services (3.5.3.1)
Note 1 to entry: Physical objects are represented as elements (3.1.3.10) within the physical view (3.1.4.7) and
perform a role. Physical objects can be implemented as cloud-based systems (3.1.2.1).
Note 2 to entry: Within many ITS reference architectures (3.1.9.5), physical objects are placed into one of five
categories: centre, support, field, vehicle or traveller (3.6.1.1).
3.1.8.2
ITS component
physical object (3.1.8.1) that has been assigned one or more functional objects (3.1.8.6) in the provision
of one or more ITS services (3.5.3.1)
Note 1 to entry: Physical objects are ITS components if they are an integral part of the system (3.1.2.1); otherwise
they are terminators (3.1.8.3).
3.1.8.3
terminator
ITS terminator
entity (3.1.1.1) that is external to the ITS service (3.5.3.1) implementation but with which the
implementation communicates either to obtain inputs or to which it can send outputs
Note 1 to entry: A terminator can exist within functional (3.1.4.5) and physical views (3.1.4.7).
3.1.8.4
information flow
information that is exchanged between physical objects (3.1.8.1)
3.1.8.5
information transfer
information flow triple
information flow (3.1.8.4) from a physical object (3.1.8.1) acting as an information provider and sent to
another physical object acting as an information consumer
Note 1 to entry: The term "information flow triple" is used extensively in the Architecture Reference for
Cooperative and Intelligent Transportation (ARC-IT; see Reference [25]).
3.1.8.6
functional object
ITS functional object
set of related processes (3.1.7.2) that are performed by a physical object (3.1.8.1) to fulfil aspects of an
ITS service (3.5.3.1)
EXAMPLE A vehicle OBE can include a "vehicle basic safety" functional object.
Note 1 to entry: The term "module" is used by the European FRAME architecture while the Architecture
Reference for Cooperative and Intelligent Transportation (ARC-IT) uses the term "functional object".
3.1.8.7
module
ITS module
functional object (3.1.8.6) that can be replaced and has defined interfaces
3.1.9 Architecture type terms
NOTE Figure A.9 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.9.1
reference architecture
architecture (3.1.3.1) that provides a template solution for planning (3.1.9.2) and deployment architectures
(3.1.9.3)
Note 1 to entry: Interface standards are based on a reference architecture, which should be explicitly described.
3.1.9.2
planning architecture
regional architecture
architecture (3.1.3.1) that provides a long-term vision of system elements (3.1.3.10) that may be deployed
and managed by different projects and/or entities (3.1.1.1) within a geographic area
Note 1 to entry: Some countries use the term "regional architecture", but in International Standards, the term
"regional" is avoided due to its multiple meanings.
3.1.9.3
deployment architecture
architecture (3.1.3.1) that provides a vision of a specific deployment of a system (3.1.2.1) within a
geographic area
3.1.9.4
ITS-S reference architecture
reference architecture (3.1.9.1) for handling communications within a physical object (3.1.8.1) as defined
in ISO 21217
Note 1 to entry: The ITS-S reference architecture provides a model for describing communication.
3.1.9.5
ITS reference architecture
reference architecture (3.1.9.1) for one or more ITS services (3.5.3.1)
Note 1 to entry: An ITS architecture can be a reference, planning or deployment architecture (3.1.9.3).
Note 2 to entry: The Harmonised Architecture Reference for Technical Standards (HARTS; see Reference [26]) is
an example of an ITS reference architecture.
3.1.9.6
ITS planning architecture
planning architecture (3.1.9.2) for one or more ITS services (3.5.3.1)
3.1.9.7
ITS deployment architecture
deployment architecture (3.1.9.3) for one or more ITS services (3.5.3.1)
3.1.10 Data concept management terms
NOTE Figure A.10 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.10.1
data concept
data element (3.1.11.1), class (3.1.11.2), value domain (3.1.11.3), data frame (3.1.11.4), message (3.1.11.5)
or interface dialogue (3.1.11.6) defined, at a minimum, with an unambiguous identifier and a definition
Note 1 to entry: In order to exchange a value corresponding to a data concept, more information than an identifier,
a name and a definition can be needed. For a property, a data type is needed. Depending on the kind of property,
other data elements such as unit of measure, and language, can be needed as well. The additional information can
be given in the data dictionary (3.1.10.3), in a data specification that references the data concept or associated
with the data themselves.
3.1.10.2
meta-attribute
documenting characteristic of a data concept (3.1.10.1) that is stored in a data dictionary (3.1.10.3)
3.1.10.3
data dictionary
collection of data concepts (3.1.10.1) that allows lookup by entity (3.1.1.1) identifier
[SOURCE: ISO 22745-2:2010, B.2.16, modified — "collection of data dictionary entries." replaced with
"collection of data concepts.".]
3.1.10.4
data concept registry
electronic data dictionary (3.1.10.3) that follows precise documented rules for the registration and
management of stored data concepts (3.1.10.1)
Note 1 to entry: The data concept registry contains meta-attributes (3.1.10.2) about data concepts in terms of their
names and representational forms as well as the semantics associated with the data concepts. A data concept
registry may contain metadata that assists information interchange and re-use, both from the perspective of
human users and for machine-interpretation of data concepts.
Note 2 to entry: A data concept registry typically includes advanced features for adding retrieving, and working
with its contents.
3.1.11 Data concept type terms
NOTE Figure A.11 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.11.1
data element
unit of data that is considered in a given context to be indivisible and which includes an unambiguous
representational form
Note 1 to entry: This definition states that a data element is “indivisible” in a given context. This means it is
possible for a data element considered indivisible in one context [e.g. location (3.4.1.1)] to be divisible in another
context (e.g. latitude, longitude, and elevation).
3.1.11.2
class
object class
set of ideas, abstractions or things in the real world that are identified with explicit boundaries and
meaning and whose properties and behaviour follow the same rules
Note 1 to entry: Some ISO/TC 204 documents use the term "object class" for consistency with ISO 11179-1, but
within ITS, the term "class" is more generally understood.
Note 2 to entry: This is semantically equivalent to a "class" as used within UML (ISO19505 -2: 2012).
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 11179-1:2015, 3.3.18, modified — term changed to from "object class" to "class" and
Notes to entry added.]
3.1.11.3
value domain
a set of permissible values
3.1.11.4
data frame
specific grouping of data elements (3.1.11.1) that describes information of interest through a useful
grouping of more atomic properties about one or more classes (3.1.11.2)
Note 1 to entry: The grouping can be a set, sequence or a choice.
Note 2 to entry: A data frame can contain other data frames.
3.1.11.5
message
grouping of data elements (3.1.11.1), data frames (3.1.11.4), or data elements and data frames that is
used to convey information
3.1.11.6
interface dialogue
dialog
dialogue
bi-directional communication sequence between two parties in accordance with predetermined
protocols
Note 1 to entry: The term "dialog" represents the American English spelling.
Note 2 to entry: The term "dialogue" can be used when the interface context is known.
3.1.12 System engineering terms
NOTE Figure A.12 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.12.1
use case
description of the behavioural requirements of a system (3.1.2.1) and its interaction (3.1.6.4) with a user
(3.5.1.3)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 26515:2018, 3.15, modified — Note 1 to entry removed.]
3.1.12.2
scenario
use case scenario
description of the sequence of events from the user's (3.5.1.3) perspective to perform a task
in a specified context
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 25062:2006, A.17]
3.1.12.3
role
specified responsibilities
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 11179-3:2013, 3.2.121]
3.1.13 Time terms
NOTE Figure A.13 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.1.13.1
instant
0-dimensional geometric primitive representing position in time
[SOURCE: ISO 19108:2002, 4.1.17, modified — Note 1 to entry removed.]
3.1.13.2
duration
time between two instants (3.1.13.1)
3.2 Technology terms
3.2.1 Top-level physical object terms
NOTE Figure A.14 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.2.1.1
central system
ITS central system
ITS component (3.1.8.2) that provides application, management, and/or administrative functions from a
centralized location (3.4.1.1), i.e. not at the roadside (3.3.1.10)
3.2.1.2
field system
ITS field system
roadside system
infrastructure-based ITS component (3.1.8.2) located outside of a data centre that is designed to provide
local processing or routing services while stationary
EXAMPLE Traffic detector, camera, signal controller, message sign, tolling station.
Note 1 to entry: Typically, field systems are located along the roadside (3.3.1.10).
Note 2 to entry: Typically, the operation of a field system is governed by management functions running in a
centre system.
Note 3 to entry: Field systems can be permanently installed or transportable.
Note 4 to entry: The term “roadside system” is typically used to describe field systems along a roadside but can
also be used to refer to kiosks.
3.2.1.3
personal system
ITS personal system
traveller system
ITS component (3.1.8.2), other than a vehicle system (3.2.1.5), that is used by a person (3.1.1.6) in relation
to a past, current or upcoming journey
3.2.1.4
support system
ITS support system
ITS component (3.1.8.2) that provides services in support of one or more other ITS components
EXAMPLE Data distribution system (3.1.2.1), network time source, cooperative ITS (3.1.2.5) credentials
management system.
3.2.1.5
vehicle system
ITS vehicle system
ITS component (3.1.8.2) that is installed as a component of a vehicle (3.7.1.1)
3.2.2 Centre physical object terms
NOTE Figure A.15 depicts the concept model for the terms defined in this subclause.
3.2.2.1
emergency management central system
centre system (3.2.1.1) that allows an entity (3.1.1.1) to manage and respond to crashes, events, disasters,
evacuation orders and other incidents
3.2.2.2
fleet and freight management central system
centre system (3.2.1.1) that allows a fleet or freight operator to manage and control its personnel,
equipment and/or freight
3.2.2.3
maintenance and construction central management system
centre system (3.2.1.1) that allows an entity (3.1.1.1) to monitor and manage the construction and
maintenance of road (3.3.5.1) infrastructure
3.2.2.4
payment administration central system
centre system (3.2.1.1) that allows an entity (3.1.1.1) to manage financial transactions related to
transportation, especially the electronic transfer of funds
3.2.2.5
public transport central management system
centre system (3.2.1.1) that allows an entity (3.1.1.1) to manage the activities of a public transport
(3.5.6.1) agency
3.2.2.6
traffic management central sys
...










Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...