Standard Guide for Using Documents Related to Metalworking or Metal Removal Fluid Health and Safety

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Application of this guide will provide users with information on how to use the various documents listed in Section 2 related to health and safety of metalworking and metal removal fluids.  
4.2 Users of the documents listed in Section 2 may fall into several categories, such as producers of metalworking or metal removal fluids, suppliers of raw materials to those producers, users of metalworking or metal removal fluids, and other interested parties such as non-governmental organizations.  
4.3 While all parties may wish to be generally familiar with all the documents listed in Section 2, producers and users may each want to focus on certain documents which are directly applicable to them:  
4.4 Documents Applicable to Producers:  
4.4.1 E1687 Test Method for Determining Carcinogenic Potential of Virgin Base Oils in Metalworking Fluids:  
4.4.1.1 Test Method E1687 covers a microbiological test procedure based upon the Salmonella  mutagenesis assay of Ames et al.7 (see also Maron et al.).8 It can be used as a screening technique to detect the presence of potential dermal carcinogens in virgin base oils used in the formulation of metalworking oils. Persons who use this test should be well versed in the conduct of the Ames test and conversant with the physical and chemical properties of petroleum products.
4.4.1.2 Producers of metalworking fluids and metal removal fluids should assure themselves that virgin base oils used in the formulation of neat metalworking and metal removal oils and soluble and semi-synthetic metal removal fluids have an acceptable mutagenicity index or mutagenic potency index.  
4.4.2 E1302 Guide for Acute Animal Toxicity Testing of Water-Miscible Metal Removal Fluids:  
4.4.2.1 Guide E1302 defines acute animal toxicity tests and sets forth references for procedures to assess the acute toxicity of water-miscible metal removal fluids as manufactured.
4.4.2.2 Application of Guide E1302 will provide information on the acute toxicity ...
SCOPE
1.1 This guide covers information on how to use documents related to health and safety of metalworking and metal removal fluids. As such, this guide will provide the user with sufficient background information to effectively use the documents listed in Section 2. Documents referenced in this guide are grouped as applicable to producers, to users or to all.  
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-Oct-2021

Relations

Effective Date
01-Mar-2024
Effective Date
01-Nov-2023
Effective Date
01-Oct-2023
Effective Date
01-Oct-2023
Effective Date
01-Oct-2023
Effective Date
01-Sep-2020
Effective Date
15-Mar-2020
Effective Date
01-Jan-2020
Effective Date
01-Oct-2019
Effective Date
01-Oct-2019
Effective Date
01-Oct-2018
Effective Date
01-Oct-2018
Effective Date
01-Oct-2018
Effective Date
01-Feb-2018
Effective Date
01-Oct-2017

Overview

ASTM E2148-21: Standard Guide for Using Documents Related to Metalworking or Metal Removal Fluid Health and Safety is an essential reference developed by ASTM International. This guide assists users in understanding and applying a broad suite of documents related to the health and safety aspects of metalworking fluids (MWF) and metal removal fluids (MRF). These fluids are integral in manufacturing industries for machining, grinding, and forming operations. Proper health and safety management is crucial due to potential exposure risks for workers, including respiratory hazards, dermatitis, and chemical toxicity. ASTM E2148-21 groups related documents for producers, users, and all stakeholders, facilitating targeted and comprehensive safety and health practices across the metalworking sector.

Key Topics

  • Health and Safety Guidance: The standard outlines how to effectively use supporting standards and documents to manage occupational health risks from metalworking and metal removal fluids.
  • Document Categorization: Documents are grouped as applicable to producers (manufacturers of MWF/MRF), users (machinists, technicians), or all parties (including raw material suppliers and health organizations).
  • Risk Identification and Assessment: The guide provides methodology for using standards that address exposure assessment, toxicity testing, contaminant monitoring, and safe handling.
  • Application Insights: Summaries of referenced standards help users select relevant documents for specific needs, such as selecting biocides, monitoring aerosols, or evaluating fluid toxicity.

Key health and safety areas addressed include:

  • Acute toxicity testing of fluids
  • Carcinogenic potential of base oils
  • Exposure to aerosols and endotoxins
  • Prevention of dermatitis and respiratory hazards
  • Microbial contamination assessment

Applications

ASTM E2148-21 is valuable for a broad range of industries and stakeholders, including:

  • Producers of Metalworking/Metal Removal Fluids: Obtain guidance on toxicity assessment (e.g., Ames test for carcinogenicity, acute toxicity protocols), quality control, and selection of raw materials.
  • Users in Manufacturing Facilities: Implement best practices for storage, handling, maintenance, and monitoring of MWF/MRF to safeguard worker health-minimizing exposure to hazardous aerosols and contact dermatitis.
  • Industrial Hygienists and Safety Managers: Reference detailed procedures for sampling workplace atmospheres (for aerosols and endotoxins), medical monitoring, and employee protection.
  • Regulatory Bodies and NGOs: Use criteria documents and best practices manuals to support regulatory compliance and improve occupational exposure standards.

Practical uses include:

  • Establishing MWF management programs in machine shops
  • Benchmarking and improving occupational exposure assessments
  • Selecting appropriate testing and monitoring protocols for fluid systems
  • Developing training and communication strategies for workers

Related Standards

ASTM E2148-21 links to numerous supporting standards and industry guides, including but not limited to:

  • E1687: Test Method for Determining Carcinogenic Potential of Virgin Base Oils in Metalworking Fluids
  • E1302: Guide for Acute Animal Toxicity Testing of Water-Miscible Metal Removal Fluids
  • E1497: Practice for Selection and Safe Use of Water-Miscible and Straight Oil Metal Removal Fluids
  • D7049: Test Method for Metalworking Fluid Aerosol in Workplace Atmospheres
  • E2144: Practice for Personal Sampling and Analysis of Endotoxin in Metalworking Fluid Aerosols
  • E2169: Practice for Selecting Antimicrobial Pesticides for Use in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
  • E2657: Practice for Determination of Endotoxin Concentrations in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
  • E2563/E2564: Methods for Enumeration of Mycobacteria in Metalworking Fluids
  • E2693: Practice for Prevention of Dermatitis in the Wet Metal Removal Fluid Environment
  • E2889: Practice for Control of Respiratory Hazards in the Metal Removal Fluid Environment
  • Industry Manuals: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) – Metalworking Fluids: Safety and Health Best Practices Manual

Conclusion

By using ASTM E2148-21 in combination with referenced documents, organizations can systematically address occupational health and safety in environments involving metalworking or metal removal fluids. Proper application supports regulatory compliance, enhances worker safety, and contributes to the overall efficiency and sustainability of metalworking operations. For more detailed procedures, users should consult the current versions of each referenced ASTM standard.

Buy Documents

Guide

ASTM E2148-21 - Standard Guide for Using Documents Related to Metalworking or Metal Removal Fluid Health and Safety

English language (5 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off
Guide

REDLINE ASTM E2148-21 - Standard Guide for Using Documents Related to Metalworking or Metal Removal Fluid Health and Safety

English language (5 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

BSI Group

BSI (British Standards Institution) is the business standards company that helps organizations make excellence a habit.

UKAS United Kingdom Verified

Bureau Veritas

Bureau Veritas is a world leader in laboratory testing, inspection and certification services.

COFRAC France Verified

DNV

DNV is an independent assurance and risk management provider.

NA Norway Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

ASTM E2148-21 is a guide published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Guide for Using Documents Related to Metalworking or Metal Removal Fluid Health and Safety". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 Application of this guide will provide users with information on how to use the various documents listed in Section 2 related to health and safety of metalworking and metal removal fluids. 4.2 Users of the documents listed in Section 2 may fall into several categories, such as producers of metalworking or metal removal fluids, suppliers of raw materials to those producers, users of metalworking or metal removal fluids, and other interested parties such as non-governmental organizations. 4.3 While all parties may wish to be generally familiar with all the documents listed in Section 2, producers and users may each want to focus on certain documents which are directly applicable to them: 4.4 Documents Applicable to Producers: 4.4.1 E1687 Test Method for Determining Carcinogenic Potential of Virgin Base Oils in Metalworking Fluids: 4.4.1.1 Test Method E1687 covers a microbiological test procedure based upon the Salmonella mutagenesis assay of Ames et al.7 (see also Maron et al.).8 It can be used as a screening technique to detect the presence of potential dermal carcinogens in virgin base oils used in the formulation of metalworking oils. Persons who use this test should be well versed in the conduct of the Ames test and conversant with the physical and chemical properties of petroleum products. 4.4.1.2 Producers of metalworking fluids and metal removal fluids should assure themselves that virgin base oils used in the formulation of neat metalworking and metal removal oils and soluble and semi-synthetic metal removal fluids have an acceptable mutagenicity index or mutagenic potency index. 4.4.2 E1302 Guide for Acute Animal Toxicity Testing of Water-Miscible Metal Removal Fluids: 4.4.2.1 Guide E1302 defines acute animal toxicity tests and sets forth references for procedures to assess the acute toxicity of water-miscible metal removal fluids as manufactured. 4.4.2.2 Application of Guide E1302 will provide information on the acute toxicity ... SCOPE 1.1 This guide covers information on how to use documents related to health and safety of metalworking and metal removal fluids. As such, this guide will provide the user with sufficient background information to effectively use the documents listed in Section 2. Documents referenced in this guide are grouped as applicable to producers, to users or to all. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 Application of this guide will provide users with information on how to use the various documents listed in Section 2 related to health and safety of metalworking and metal removal fluids. 4.2 Users of the documents listed in Section 2 may fall into several categories, such as producers of metalworking or metal removal fluids, suppliers of raw materials to those producers, users of metalworking or metal removal fluids, and other interested parties such as non-governmental organizations. 4.3 While all parties may wish to be generally familiar with all the documents listed in Section 2, producers and users may each want to focus on certain documents which are directly applicable to them: 4.4 Documents Applicable to Producers: 4.4.1 E1687 Test Method for Determining Carcinogenic Potential of Virgin Base Oils in Metalworking Fluids: 4.4.1.1 Test Method E1687 covers a microbiological test procedure based upon the Salmonella mutagenesis assay of Ames et al.7 (see also Maron et al.).8 It can be used as a screening technique to detect the presence of potential dermal carcinogens in virgin base oils used in the formulation of metalworking oils. Persons who use this test should be well versed in the conduct of the Ames test and conversant with the physical and chemical properties of petroleum products. 4.4.1.2 Producers of metalworking fluids and metal removal fluids should assure themselves that virgin base oils used in the formulation of neat metalworking and metal removal oils and soluble and semi-synthetic metal removal fluids have an acceptable mutagenicity index or mutagenic potency index. 4.4.2 E1302 Guide for Acute Animal Toxicity Testing of Water-Miscible Metal Removal Fluids: 4.4.2.1 Guide E1302 defines acute animal toxicity tests and sets forth references for procedures to assess the acute toxicity of water-miscible metal removal fluids as manufactured. 4.4.2.2 Application of Guide E1302 will provide information on the acute toxicity ... SCOPE 1.1 This guide covers information on how to use documents related to health and safety of metalworking and metal removal fluids. As such, this guide will provide the user with sufficient background information to effectively use the documents listed in Section 2. Documents referenced in this guide are grouped as applicable to producers, to users or to all. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

ASTM E2148-21 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 13.100 - Occupational safety. Industrial hygiene. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ASTM E2148-21 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM D7049-24, ASTM E2523-23, ASTM E2563-23, ASTM E2889-23, ASTM E2564-23, ASTM D1356-20a, ASTM D1356-20, ASTM E1542-20, ASTM E1687-19, ASTM E2693-19, ASTM E2564-18, ASTM E2523-13(2018), ASTM E2563-18, ASTM E1542-18, ASTM E2889-12(2017). Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ASTM E2148-21 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: E2148 − 21 An American National Standard
Standard Guide for
Using Documents Related to Metalworking or Metal
Removal Fluid Health and Safety
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2148; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope* E1497 Practice for Selection and Safe Use of Water-
Miscible and Straight Oil Metal Removal Fluids
1.1 This guide covers information on how to use documents
E1542 Terminology Relating to Occupational Health and
relatedtohealthandsafetyofmetalworkingandmetalremoval
Safety
fluids. As such, this guide will provide the user with sufficient
E1687 Test Method for Determining Carcinogenic Potential
background information to effectively use the documents listed
of Virgin Base Oils in Metalworking Fluids
in Section 2. Documents referenced in this guide are grouped
E1972 Practice for Minimizing Effects of Aerosols in the
as applicable to producers, to users or to all.
Wet Metal Removal Environment (Withdrawn 2017)
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the
E2144 Practice for Personal Sampling and Analysis of En-
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
dotoxin in Metalworking Fluid Aerosols in Workplace
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
Atmospheres
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
E2169 Practice for Selecting Antimicrobial Pesticides for
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Use in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
1.3 This international standard was developed in accor-
E2523 Terminology for Metalworking Fluids and Opera-
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
tions
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
E2563 Practice for Enumeration of Non-Tuberculosis Myco-
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
bacteria in Aqueous Metalworking Fluids by Plate Count
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
Method
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
E2564 Practice for Enumeration of Mycobacteria in Metal-
working Fluids by Direct Microscopic Counting (DMC)
2. Referenced Documents
Method
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E2657 Practice for Determination of Endotoxin Concentra-
D1356 Terminology Relating to Sampling and Analysis of
tions in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
Atmospheres
E2693 Practice for Prevention of Dermatitis in the Wet
D3519 Test Method for Foam in Aqueous Media (Blender
Metal Removal Fluid Environment
Test) (Withdrawn 2013)
E2694 Test Method for Measurement ofAdenosine Triphos-
D3601 Test Method for Foam In Aqueous Media (Bottle
phate in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
Test) (Withdrawn 2013)
E2889 Practice for Control of Respiratory Hazards in the
D7049 Test Method for Metalworking Fluid Aerosol in
Metal Removal Fluid Environment
Workplace Atmospheres
E3265 Guide for Evaluating Water-Miscible Metalworking
E1302 Guide for Acute Animal Toxicity Testing of Water-
Fluid Foaming Tendency
Miscible Metalworking Fluids
2.2 Other Documents:
Management of the Metal Removal Fluid Environment: A
This guide is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee E34 on Occupational
Guide to Safe and Efficient Use of Metal Removal Fluids
HealthandSafetyandisthedirectresponsibilityofSubcommitteeE34.50onHealth
Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Expo-
and Safety Standards for Metal Working Fluids.
sure to Metalworking Fluids
Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2021. Published November 2021. Originally
approved in 2001. Last previous edition approved in 2016 as E2148 – 16. DOI:
10.1520/E2148-21.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Available from Organization Resources Counselors, Inc., 1910 Sunderland
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Place, NW, Washington DC 20036 or at http://www.orc-dc.com
the ASTM website. Available from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occu-
www.astm.org. pational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E2148 − 21
7 8
Metalworking Fluids: Safety and Health Best Practices Ames et al. (see also Maron et al.). It can be used as a
Manual screening technique to detect the presence of potential dermal
carcinogens in virgin base oils used in the formulation of
3. Terminology
metalworking oils. Persons who use this test should be well
versed in the conduct of theAmes test and conversant with the
3.1 For definitions and terms relating to this guide, refer to
Terminologies D1356, E1542, and E2523. physical and chemical properties of petroleum products.
4.4.1.2 Producers of metalworking fluids and metal removal
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
fluids should assure themselves that virgin base oils used in the
3.2.1 endotoxin,n—pyrogenichighmolarmasslipopolysac-
formulation of neat metalworking and metal removal oils and
charide (LPS) complex associated with the cell wall of
soluble and semi-synthetic metal removal fluids have an
gram-negative bacteria.
acceptable mutagenicity index or mutagenic potency index.
3.2.1.1 Discussion—Though endotoxins are pyrogens, not
4.4.2 E1302 Guide for Acute Animal Toxicity Testing of
all pyrogens are endotoxins. Endotoxins are specifically de-
Water-Miscible Metal Removal Fluids:
tected through a Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) test.
4.4.2.1 Guide E1302 defines acute animal toxicity tests and
3.2.2 metal removal fluids, n—the subset of metalworking
sets forth references for procedures to assess the acute toxicity
fluids that are used for wet machining or grinding to produce
of water-miscible metal removal fluids as manufactured.
the finished part.
4.4.2.2 Application of Guide E1302 will provide informa-
3.2.2.1 Discussion—Metal removal fluids addressed by this
tion on the acute toxicity of water-miscible metal removal
guide include straight or neat oils not intended for further
fluids and will assist the user in evaluating the potential health
dilution with water, and water-miscible soluble oils,
hazards of the fluid and developing appropriate work practices.
semisynthetics,andsynthetics,whichareintendedtobediluted
4.4.3 E3265 Guide for Evaluating Water-Miscible Metal-
with water before use. Metal removal fluids become contami-
working Fluid Foaming Tendency:
nated during use in the workplace with a variety of workplace
4.4.3.1 Guide E3265 provides an overview of foaming
substances including, but not limited to: abrasive particles,
tendency evaluation protocols and their appropriate use.
tramp oils, cleaners, dirt, metal fines and shavings, dissolved
4.4.3.2 Test Methods D3519 and D3601 were withdrawn in
metal and hard water salts, bacteria, fungi, microbiological
2013. Although each method had some utility, neither method
decay products, and waste. These contaminants can cause
reliably predicted in-use foaming tendency. Since Test Meth-
changes in the lubricity and cooling ability of the metal
ods D3519 and D3601 were first adopted several more predic-
removal fluid as well as have the potential to adversely affect
tive test protocols have been developed. However, it is also
the health and welfare of employees in contact with the
common knowledge that no single protocol is universally
contaminated metal removal fluid.
suitable for predicting water-miscible metalworking fluid
3.2.3 mutagenicity index, n—the slope of the dose response
(MWF) foaming tendency.
curve for mutagenicity in the modified Ames test described in
4.4.3.3 There are no generally recognized reference stan-
Test Method E1687.
dard fluids (either MWF or foam control additive). Instead, it
is important to include a relevant reference sample in all
4. Significance and Use
testing.
4.1 Application of this guide will provide users with infor- 4.4.3.4 Guide E3265 summarizes foam forming theory then
mation on how to use the various documents listed in Section
provides a summary of commonly used foaming test protocols,
2 related to health and safety of metalworking and metal including blender, shake, air sparge, and recirculation tests.
removal fluids.
4.4.3.5 For each protocol, Guide E3265 explains the testing
concept, apparatus needed, a summary of the test process,
4.2 Users of the documents listed in Section 2 may fall into
reporting, protocol variations, most appropriate applications
several categories, such as producers of metalworking or metal
and advantages, and least appropriate applications and limita-
removal fluids, suppliers of raw materials to those producers,
tions.
users of metalworking or metal removal fluids, and other
interested parties such as non-governmental organizations.
4.5 Documents Applicable to Users:
4.5.1 E1497 Practice for Selection and Safe Use of Water-
4.3 While all parties may wish to be generally familiar with
Miscible and Straight Oil Metal Removal Fluids:
all the documents listed in Section 2, producers and users may
4.5.1.1 Practice E1497 sets forth guidelines for the safe use
each want to focus on certain documents which are directly
of metal removal fluids, additives, and biocides. This includes
applicable to them:
product selection, storage, dispensing, and maintenance.
4.4 Documents Applicable to Producers:
4.5.1.2 Water-miscible metal removal fluids are typically
4.4.1 E1687 Test Method for Determining Carcinogenic
used at high dilution and dilution rates vary widely.
Potential of Virgin Base Oils in Metalworking Fluids:
Additionally, there is potential for exposure to undiluted metal
4.4.1.1 Test Method E1687 covers a microbiological test
removal fluid as manufactured, as well as metal removal fluid
procedure based upon the Salmonella mutagenesis assay of
additives and biocides.
Available from US Occupational Health and Safety Administration, 200
ConstitutionAvenue NW, Washington, DC 20210 or at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/ Ames, B. N., et al., Mutation Research, Vol 31, 1975, pp. 347–363.
metalworkingfluids/metalworkingfluids_manual.html. Maron, D., et al., Mutation Research, Vol 113, 1983, pp. 173–215.
E2148 − 21
4.5.1.3 Straight oils generally consist of a severely solvent- selection and application. Instead, it provides a general under-
refined or hydro-treated petroleum oil, a synthetic oil, or other standing of the selection process and its supporting consider-
oilsofanimalorvegetableorigin.Straightoilsarenotintended ations.
to be diluted with water prior to use. Additives are often 4.5.6 E2657 Practice for Determination of Endotoxin Con-
included in straight oil formulations.
centration in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids:
4.5.2 E1972 Practice for Minimizing Effects of Aerosols in
4.5.6.1 Practice E2657 covers quantitative methods for the
the Wet Metal Removal Environment: sampling and determination of Gram-negative bacterial endo-
4.5.2.1 Practice E1972 sets forth guidelines for minimizing toxin concentrations in water-miscible metalworking fluids
effects of aerosols in the wet metal removal environment. (MWF).
4.5.2.2 Practice E1972 incorporates all practical means and 4.5.6.2 Users of Practice E2657 should be familiar with the
mechanisms to minimize aerosol generation and to control handling of MWF.
effects of aerosols in the wet metal removal environment.
4.5.6.3 Practice E2657 gives an estimate of the endotoxin
4.5.3 D7049 Test Method for Metal Removal Fluid Aerosol concentration of the sampled MWF.
in Workplace Atmospheres: (1) Used onsite, Practice E2657 gives an indication of
changes in Gram-negative bacterial contamination in the
4.5.3.1 Test Method D7049 covers a procedure for the
determination of both total collected particulate matter and MWF.
(2) Practice E2657 does not replace Practice E2144.
extractable mass metal removal fluid aerosol concentrations in
3 3
a range from 0.05 mg/m to 5 mg/m in workplace atmo- 4.5.6.4 Practice E2657 seeks to minimize interlaboratory
spheres. variation but does not ensure uniformity of results.
4.5.3.2 Test Method D7049 describes a standardized means 4.5.6.5 Practice E2657 is intended to relate endotoxin con-
of collecting worker
...


This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: E2148 − 16 E2148 − 21 An American National Standard
Standard Guide for
Using Documents Related to Metalworking or Metal
Removal Fluid Health and Safety
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2148; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope Scope*
1.1 This guide covers information on how to use documents related to health and safety of metalworking and metal removal fluids.
As such, this guide will provide the user with sufficient background information to effectively use the documents listed in Section
2. Documents referenced in this guide are grouped as applicable to producers, to users or to all.
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory requirementslimitations prior to use.
1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D1356 Terminology Relating to Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheres
D3519 Test Method for Foam in Aqueous Media (Blender Test) (Withdrawn 2013)
D3601 Test Method for Foam In Aqueous Media (Bottle Test) (Withdrawn 2013)
D7049 Test Method for Metalworking Fluid Aerosol in Workplace Atmospheres
E1302 Guide for Acute Animal Toxicity Testing of Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
E1497 Practice for Selection and Safe Use of Water-Miscible and Straight Oil Metal Removal Fluids
E1542 Terminology Relating to Occupational Health and Safety
E1687 Test Method for Determining Carcinogenic Potential of Virgin Base Oils in Metalworking Fluids
E1972 Practice for Minimizing Effects of Aerosols in the Wet Metal Removal Environment (Withdrawn 2017)
E2144 Practice for Personal Sampling and Analysis of Endotoxin in Metalworking Fluid Aerosols in Workplace Atmospheres
E2169 Practice for Selecting Antimicrobial Pesticides for Use in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
E2523 Terminology for Metalworking Fluids and Operations
E2563 Practice for Enumeration of Non-Tuberculosis Mycobacteria in Aqueous Metalworking Fluids by Plate Count Method
E2564 Practice for Enumeration of Mycobacteria in Metalworking Fluids by Direct Microscopic Counting (DMC) Method
E2657 Practice for Determination of Endotoxin Concentrations in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
E2693 Practice for Prevention of Dermatitis in the Wet Metal Removal Fluid Environment
This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E34 on Occupational Health and Safety and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E34.50 on Health and
Safety Standards for Metal Working Fluids.
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2016Nov. 1, 2021. Published October 2016November 2021. Originally approved in 2001. Last previous edition approved in 20112016
as E2148 - 11b.E2148 – 16. DOI: 10.1520/E2148-16.10.1520/E2148-21.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on www.astm.org.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E2148 − 21
E2694 Test Method for Measurement of Adenosine Triphosphate in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
E2889 Practice for Control of Respiratory Hazards in the Metal Removal Fluid Environment
E3265 Guide for Evaluating Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluid Foaming Tendency
2.2 Other Documents:
Management of the Metal Removal Fluid Environment: A Guide to Safe and Efficient Use of Metal Removal Flu-
3 4
ids Management of the Metal Removal Fluid Environment: A Guide to Safe and Efficient Use of Metal Removal Fluids
Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Metalworking Fluids Criteria for a Recommended Standard:
Occupational Exposure to Metalworking Fluids
5 6
Metalworking Fluids: Safety and Health Best Practices Manual Metalworking Fluids: Safety and Health Best Practices Manual
3. Terminology
3.1 For definitions and terms relating to this practice,guide, refer to Terminologies D1356, E1542, and E2523.
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 endotoxin, n—pyrogenic high molar mass lipopolysaccharide (LPS) complex associated with the cell wall of gram-negative
bacteria.
3.2.1.1 Discussion—
Though endotoxins are pyrogens, not all pyrogens are endotoxins. Endotoxins are specifically detected through a Limulus
Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) test.
3.2.2 metal removal fluids, n—the subset of metalworking fluids that are used for wet machining or grinding to produce the
finished part.
3.2.2.1 Discussion—
Metal removal fluids addressed by this practiceguide include straight or neat oils,oils not intended for further dilution with water,
and water-miscible soluble oils, semisynthetics, and synthetics, which are intended to be diluted with water before use. Metal
removal fluids become contaminated during use in the workplace with a variety of workplace substances including, but not limited
to,to: abrasive particles, tramp oils, cleaners, dirt, metal fines and shavings, dissolved metal and hard water salts, bacteria, fungi,
microbiological decay products, and waste. These contaminants can cause changes in the lubricity and cooling ability of the metal
removal fluid as well as have the potential to adversely affect the health and welfare of employees in contact with the contaminated
metal removal fluid.
3.2.3 mutagenicity index, n—the slope of the dose response curve for mutagenicity in the modified Ames test described in Test
Method E1687.
4. Significance and Use
4.1 Application of this guide will provide users with information on how to use the various documents listed in Section 2 related
to health and safety of metalworking and metal removal fluids.
4.2 Users of the documents listed in Section 2 may fall into several categories, such as producers of metalworking or metal
removal fluids, suppliers of raw materials to those producers, users of metalworking or metal removal fluids, and other interested
parties,parties such as non governmental non-governmental organizations.
4.3 While all parties may wish to be generally familiar with all the documents listed in Section 2, producers and users may each
want to focus on certain documents which are directly applicable to them:
4.4 Documents Applicable to Producers:
4.4.1 E1687 Test Method for Determining Carcinogenic Potential of Virgin Base Oils in Metalworking Fluids:
Available from Organization Resources Counselors, Inc., 1910 Sunderland Place, NW, Washington DC 20036 or at http://www.orc-dc.com
Available from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
Available from US Occupational Health and Safety Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210 or at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/
metalworkingfluids/metalworkingfluids_manual.html http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/metalworkingfluids/metalworkingfluids_manual.html.
E2148 − 21
4.4.1.1 Test Method E1687 covers a microbiological test procedure based upon the Salmonella mutagenesis assay of Ames et. alet
7 8
al. (see also Maron et al.). It can be used as a screening technique to detect the presence of potential dermal carcinogens in virgin
base oils used in the formulation of metalworking oils. Persons who use this test should be well-versed well versed in the conduct
of the Ames test and conversant with the physical and chemical properties of petroleum products.
4.4.1.2 Producers of metalworking fluids and metal removal fluids should assure themselves that virgin base oils used in the
formulation of neat metalworking and metal removal oils and soluble and semi-synthetic metal removal fluids have an acceptable
mutagenicity index or mutagenic potency index.
4.4.2 E1302 Guide for Acute Animal Toxicity Testing of Water-Miscible Metal Removal Fluids:
4.4.2.1 Guide E1302 defines acute animal toxicity tests and sets forth references for procedures to assess the acute toxicity of
water-miscible metal removal fluids as manufactured.
4.4.2.2 Application of Guide E1302 will provide information on the acute toxicity of water-miscible metal removal fluids and will
assist the user in evaluating the potential health hazards of the fluid and developing appropriate work practices.
4.4.3 E3265 Guide for Evaluating Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluid Foaming Tendency:
4.4.3.1 Guide E3265 provides an overview of foaming tendency evaluation protocols and their appropriate use.
4.4.3.2 Test Methods D3519 and D3601 were withdrawn in 2013. Although each method had some utility, neither method reliably
predicted in-use foaming tendency. Since Test Methods D3519 and D3601 were first adopted several more predictive test protocols
have been developed. However, it is also common knowledge that no single protocol is universally suitable for predicting
water-miscible metalworking fluid (MWF) foaming tendency.
4.4.3.3 There are no generally recognized reference standard fluids (either MWF or foam control additive). Instead, it is important
to include a relevant reference sample in all testing.
4.4.3.4 Guide E3265 summarizes foam forming theory then provides a summary of commonly used foaming test protocols,
including blender, shake, air sparge, and recirculation tests.
4.4.3.5 For each protocol, Guide E3265 explains the testing concept, apparatus needed, a summary of the test process, reporting,
protocol variations, most appropriate applications and advantages, and least appropriate applications and limitations.
4.5 Documents Applicable to Users:
4.5.1 E1497 Practice for Selection and Safe Use of Water-Miscible and Straight Oil Metal Removal Fluids:
4.5.1.1 Practice E1497 sets forth guidelines for the safe use of metal removal fluids, additives, and biocides. This includes product
selection, storage, dispensing, and maintenance.
4.5.1.2 Water-miscible metal removal fluids are typically used at high dilution and dilution rates vary widely. Additionally, there
is potential for exposure to undiluted metal removal fluid as manufactured, as well as metal removal fluid additives and biocides.
4.5.1.3 Straight oils generally consist of a severely solvent-refined or hydro-treated petroleum oil, a synthetic oil, or other oils of
animal or vegetable origin. Straight oils are not intended to be diluted with water prior to use. Additives are often included in
straight oil formulations.
4.5.2 E1972 Practice for Minimizing Effects of Aerosols in the Wet Metal Removal Environment:
4.5.2.1 Practice E1972 sets forth guidelines for minimizing effects of aerosols in the wet metal removal environment.
Ames, B. N.N., et al., Mutation Research, Vol 31, 1975, pp. 347–363.
Maron, D.D., et al., Mutation Research, Vol 113, 1983, pp. 173–215.
E2148 − 21
4.5.2.2 Practice E1972 incorporates all practical means and mechanisms to minimize aerosol generation and to control effects of
aerosols in the wet metal removal environment.
4.5.3 D7049 Test Method for Metal Removal Fluid Aerosol in Workplace Atmospheres:
4.5.3.1 Test Method D7049 covers a procedure for the determination of both total collected particulate matter and extractable mass
3 3
metal removal fluid aerosol concentrations in a range from 0.05 mg/m to 5 mg/m in workplace atmospheres.
4.5.3.2 Test Method D7049 describes a standardized means of collecting worker exposure information that can be compared to
existing exposure databases, using a test method that is also more specific to metal removal fluids.
4.5.4 E2144 Practice for Personal Sampling and Analysis of Endotoxin in Metalworking Fluid Aerosols in Workplace
Atmospheres:
4.5.4.1 Practice E2144 covers quantitative methods for the personal sampling and determination of bacterial endotoxin
concentrations in polydisperse metal removal fluid aerosols in workplace atmospheres. Users should have fundamental knowledge
of microbiological techniques and endotoxin testing.
4.5.4.2 Endotoxins in metal removal fluid aerosols present potential respiratory hazards to workers who inhale them.
4.5.4.3 Users of Practice E2144 may obtain personal exposure data of endotoxin in metal removal fluid aerosols, either on a
short-term or full-shift basis in workplace atmospheres.
4.5.4.4 Practice E2144 gives an estimate of the endotoxin concentration of the sampled atmosphere.
4.5.4.5 Practice E2144 seeks to minimize interlaboratory variation, but does not ensure uniformity of results.
4.5.4.6 It is anticipated that Practice E2144 will facilitate interlaboratory comparisons of airborne endotoxin data from
metalworking fluid atmospheres, particularly metal removal fluid atmosphe
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...