IEC 62047-8:2011
(Main)Semiconductor devices - Micro-electromechanical devices - Part 8: Strip bending test method for tensile property measurement of thin films
Semiconductor devices - Micro-electromechanical devices - Part 8: Strip bending test method for tensile property measurement of thin films
IEC 62047-8:2011 specifies the strip bending test method to measure tensile properties of thin films with high accuracy, repeatability, moderate effort of alignment and handling compared to the conventional tensile test. This testing method is valid for test pieces with a thickness between 50 nm and several mum, and with an aspect ratio (ratio of length to thickness) of more than 300. The hanging strip (or bridge) between two fixed supports are widely adopted in MEMS or micro-machines. It is much easier to fabricate these strips than the conventional tensile test pieces. The test procedures are so simple to be readily automated. This international standard can be utilized as a quality control test for MEMS production since its testing throughput is very high compared to the conventional tensile test.
Dispositifs à semiconducteurs - Dispositifs microélectromécaniques - Partie 8: Méthode d'essai de la flexion de bandes en vue de la mesure des propriétés de traction des couches minces
La CEI 62047-8:2011 spécifie la méthode d'essai de flexion de bandes, afin de mesurer les propriétés de traction des couches minces avec une haute précision, répétabilité, un effort modéré d'alignement et de manipulation en comparaison de l'essai de traction conventionnel. La méthode d'essai est valable pour les éprouvettes d'essai dont l'épaisseur est comprise entre 50 nm et plusieurs mum, et dont le rapport, (soit le rapport de la longueur de l'éprouvette à son épaisseur) est supérieur 300. La bande suspendue (ou le pont) entre deux supports fixés est largement adoptée dans les MEMS ou dans les micromachines. Ces bandes sont bien plus faciles à fabriquer que les éprouvettes d'essai à la traction conventionnelles. Les procédures d'essai sont si simples qu'elles sont aisément automatisées. La présente norme internationale peut être utilisée en tant qu'essai de contrôle de la qualité pour la production des MEMS étant donné que son débit d'essai est très élevé comparé à l'essai de traction conventionnel.
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
IEC 62047-8 ®
Edition 1.0 2011-03
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD
NORME
INTERNATIONALE
colour
inside
Semiconductor devices – Micro-electromechanical devices –
Part 8: Strip bending test method for tensile property measurement of thin films
Dispositifs à semiconducteurs – Dispositifs microélectromécaniques –
Partie 8: Méthode d’essai de la flexion de bandes en vue de la mesure des
propriétés de traction des couches minces
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by
any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either IEC or
IEC's member National Committee in the country of the requester.
If you have any questions about IEC copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this publication,
please contact the address below or your local IEC member National Committee for further information.
Droits de reproduction réservés. Sauf indication contraire, aucune partie de cette publication ne peut être reproduite
ni utilisée sous quelque forme que ce soit et par aucun procédé, électronique ou mécanique, y compris la photocopie
et les microfilms, sans l'accord écrit de la CEI ou du Comité national de la CEI du pays du demandeur.
Si vous avez des questions sur le copyright de la CEI ou si vous désirez obtenir des droits supplémentaires sur cette
publication, utilisez les coordonnées ci-après ou contactez le Comité national de la CEI de votre pays de résidence.
IEC Central Office
3, rue de Varembé
CH-1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland
Email: inmail@iec.ch
Web: www.iec.ch
About the IEC
The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is the leading global organization that prepares and publishes
International Standards for all electrical, electronic and related technologies.
About IEC publications
The technical content of IEC publications is kept under constant review by the IEC. Please make sure that you have the
latest edition, a corrigenda or an amendment might have been published.
Catalogue of IEC publications: www.iec.ch/searchpub
The IEC on-line Catalogue enables you to search by a variety of criteria (reference number, text, technical committee,…).
It also gives information on projects, withdrawn and replaced publications.
IEC Just Published: www.iec.ch/online_news/justpub
Stay up to date on all new IEC publications. Just Published details twice a month all new publications released. Available
on-line and also by email.
Electropedia: www.electropedia.org
The world's leading online dictionary of electronic and electrical terms containing more than 20 000 terms and definitions
in English and French, with equivalent terms in additional languages. Also known as the International Electrotechnical
Vocabulary online.
Customer Service Centre: www.iec.ch/webstore/custserv
If you wish to give us your feedback on this publication or need further assistance, please visit the Customer Service
Centre FAQ or contact us:
Email: csc@iec.ch
Tel.: +41 22 919 02 11
Fax: +41 22 919 03 00
A propos de la CEI
La Commission Electrotechnique Internationale (CEI) est la première organisation mondiale qui élabore et publie des
normes internationales pour tout ce qui a trait à l'électricité, à l'électronique et aux technologies apparentées.
A propos des publications CEI
Le contenu technique des publications de la CEI est constamment revu. Veuillez vous assurer que vous possédez
l’édition la plus récente, un corrigendum ou amendement peut avoir été publié.
Catalogue des publications de la CEI: www.iec.ch/searchpub/cur_fut-f.htm
Le Catalogue en-ligne de la CEI vous permet d’effectuer des recherches en utilisant différents critères (numéro de référence,
texte, comité d’études,…). Il donne aussi des informations sur les projets et les publications retirées ou remplacées.
Just Published CEI: www.iec.ch/online_news/justpub
Restez informé sur les nouvelles publications de la CEI. Just Published détaille deux fois par mois les nouvelles
publications parues. Disponible en-ligne et aussi par email.
Electropedia: www.electropedia.org
Le premier dictionnaire en ligne au monde de termes électroniques et électriques. Il contient plus de 20 000 termes et
définitions en anglais et en français, ainsi que les termes équivalents dans les langues additionnelles. Egalement appelé
Vocabulaire Electrotechnique International en ligne.
Service Clients: www.iec.ch/webstore/custserv/custserv_entry-f.htm
Si vous désirez nous donner des commentaires sur cette publication ou si vous avez des questions, visitez le FAQ du
Service clients ou contactez-nous:
Email: csc@iec.ch
Tél.: +41 22 919 02 11
Fax: +41 22 919 03 00
IEC 62047-8 ®
Edition 1.0 2011-03
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD
NORME
INTERNATIONALE
colour
inside
Semiconductor devices – Micro-electromechanical devices –
Part 8: Strip bending test method for tensile property measurement of thin films
Dispositifs à semiconducteurs – Dispositifs microélectromécaniques –
Partie 8: Méthode d’essai de la flexion de bandes en vue de la mesure des
propriétés de traction des couches minces
INTERNATIONAL
ELECTROTECHNICAL
COMMISSION
COMMISSION
ELECTROTECHNIQUE
PRICE CODE
INTERNATIONALE
CODE PRIX R
ICS 31.080.99 ISBN 978-2-88912-395-7
– 2 – 62047-8 Ó IEC:2011
CONTENTS
FOREWORD . 3
1 Scope . 5
2 Normative references . 5
3 Terms and definitions . 5
4 Test apparatus . 5
4.1 General . 5
4.2 Actuator . 6
4.3 Load tip . 6
4.4 Alignment mechanism . 6
4.5 Force and displacement sensors . 6
4.6 Test environment. 6
5 Test piece . 6
5.1 General . 6
5.2 Shape of test piece . 7
5.3 Measurement of test piece dimension . 7
6 Test procedure and analysis . 8
6.1 General . 8
6.2 Data analysis . 8
7 Test report. 9
Annex A (informative) Data analysis: Test results by using nanoindentation apparatus . 10
Annex B (informative) Test piece fabrication: MEMS process . 13
Annex C (informative) Effect of misalignment and geometry on property measurement . 15
Bibliography . 18
Figure 1 – Thin film test piece . 7
Figure 2 – Schematic of strip bending test . 9
Figure A.1 – Three successive indents for determining the reference location of a test
piece . 10
Figure A.2 – A schematic view of nanoindentation apparatus . 11
Figure A.3 – Actuator force vs. deflection curves for strip bending test and for leaf
spring test . 11
Figure A.4 – Force vs. deflection curve of a test piece after compensating the stiffness
of the leaf spring . 12
Figure B.1 – Fabrication procedure for test piece . 13
Figure C.1 – Finite element analysis of errors based on the constitutive data of Au thin
film of 1 mm thick . 16
Figure C.2 – Translational (d) and angular (a, b, g) misalignments . 17
Table 1 – Symbols and designations of a test piece . 7
62047-8 Ó IEC:2011 – 3 –
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION
____________
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES –
MICRO-ELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES –
Part 8: Strip bending test method
for tensile property measurement of thin films
FOREWORD
1) The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is a worldwide organization for standardization comprising
all national electrotechnical committees (IEC National Committees). The object of IEC is to promote
international co-operation on all questions concerning standardization in the electrical and electronic fields. To
this end and in addition to other activities, IEC publishes International Standards, Technical Specifications,
Technical Reports, Publicly Available Specifications (PAS) and Guides (hereafter referred to as “IEC
Publication(s)”). Their preparation is entrusted to technical committees; any IEC National Committee interested
in the subject dealt with may participate in this preparatory work. International, governmental and non-
governmental organizations liaising with the IEC also participate in this preparation. IEC collaborates closely
with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in accordance with conditions determined by
agreement between the two organizations.
2) The formal decisions or agreements of IEC on technical matters express, as nearly as possible, an international
consensus of opinion on the relevant subjects since each technical committee has representation from all
interested IEC National Committees.
3) IEC Publications have the form of recommendations for international use and are accepted by IEC National
Committees in that sense. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure that the technical content of IEC
Publications is accurate, IEC cannot be held responsible for the way in which they are used or for any
misinterpretation by any end user.
4) In order to promote international uniformity, IEC National Committees undertake to apply IEC Publications
transparently to the maximum extent possible in their national and regional publications. Any divergence
between any IEC Publication and the corresponding national or regional publication shall be clearly indicated in
the latter.
5) IEC itself does not provide any attestation of conformity. Independent certification bodies provide conformity
assessment services and, in some areas, access to IEC marks of conformity. IEC is not responsible for any
services carried out by independent certification bodies.
6) All users should ensure that they have the latest edition of this publication.
7) No liability shall attach to IEC or its directors, employees, servants or agents including individual experts and
members of its technical committees and IEC National Committees for any personal injury, property damage or
other damage of any nature whatsoever, whether direct or indirect, or for costs (including legal fees) and
expenses arising out of the publication, use of, or reliance upon, this IEC Publication or any other IEC
Publications.
8) Attention is drawn to the Normative references cited in this publication. Use of the referenced publications is
indispensable for the correct application of this publication.
9) Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this IEC Publication may be the subject of
patent rights. IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
International Standard IEC 62047-8 has been prepared by subcommittee 47F: Micro-
electromechanical systems, of IEC technical committee 47: Semiconductor devices
The text of this standard is based on the following documents:
FDIS Report on voting
47F/71/FDIS 47F/77/RVD
Full information on the voting for the approval of this standard can be found in the report on
voting indicated in the above table.
This publication has been drafted in accordance with the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
A list of all parts of IEC 62047, under the general title Semiconductor devices – Micro-
electromechanical devices can be found on the IEC website.
– 4 – 62047-8 Ó IEC:2011
The committee has decided that the contents of this publication will remain unchanged until
the stability date indicated on the IEC web site under "http://webstore.iec.ch" in the data
related to the specific publication. At this date, the publication will be
• reconfirmed,
• withdrawn,
• replaced by a revised edition, or
• amended.
IMPORTANT – The 'colour inside' logo on the cover page of this publication indicates
that it contains colours which are considered to be useful for the correct
understanding of its contents. Users should therefore print this document using a
colour printer.
62047-8 Ó IEC:2011 – 5 –
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES –
MICRO-ELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES –
Part 8: Strip bending test method
for tensile property measurement of thin films
1 Scope
This international standard specifies the strip bending test method to measure tensile
properties of thin films with high accuracy, repeatability, moderate effort of alignment and
handling compared to the conventional tensile test. This testing method is valid for test pieces
with a thickness between 50 nm and several mm, and with an aspect ratio (ratio of length to
thickness) of more than 300.
The hanging strip (or bridge) between two fixed supports are widely adopted in MEMS or
micro-machines. It is much easier to fabricate these strips than the conventional tensile test
pieces. The test procedures are so simple to be readily automated. This international
standard can be utilized as a quality control test for MEMS production since its testing
throughput is very high compared to the conventional tensile test.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document.
For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition
of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
NONE
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document the following terms and definitions apply.
3.1
deflection
w
displacement of a test piece at the middle of the length, which is measured with respect to the
straight line connecting two fixed ends of the test piece
3.2
deflection angle
b
angle between the deformed test piece and the straight line connecting two fixed ends of the
test piece
NOTE Test piece in this document is often referred to as a strip bending specimen.
4 Test apparatus
4.1 General
A test apparatus is composed of an actuator, a load-sensor, a displacement sensor, and
alignment mechanism as other mechanical testers such as micro-tensile tester and
– 6 – 62047-8 Ó IEC:2011
nanoindentation apparatus. A test piece in a form of strip is very compliant and experiences
large deflection under a small load when comparing it with a micro-tensile test piece with
similar dimensions. In this respect, the load-sensor should have an excellent resolution and
the displacement sensor should have a long measuring range. Details on each component of
test apparatus are described as follows.
4.2 Actuator
All actuating devices that are capable of linear movement can be used for the test, e.g.
piezoelectric actuator, voice coil actuator, servo motor, etc. However, a device with fine
displacement resolution is highly recommended due to small dimensions of the test piece.
The resolution shall be better than 1/1 000 of maximum deflection of test piece.
4.3 Load tip
The load tip which applies a line contact force to the test piece is shaped like a conventional
wedge type indenter tip and can be made of diamond, sapphire or other hard materials. The
radius of the tip shall be comparable to or larger than the thickness of the test piece, and less
than L/50 (refer to Annex C.3).
4.4 Alignment mechanism
The load tip shall be installed on the test apparatus aligned with the load and the
displacement measuring axes, and the misalignment shall be less than 1 degree. The load tip
shall be also aligned to the surface of the test piece with the deviation angles less than 1
degree (refer to Annex C for definition of deviation angles and error estimation of
misalignment). It is desirable to equip the apparatus with tilt stages for adjusting the deviation
angle. The load tip is to be positioned at the centre of the test piece and the positional
accuracy shall be less than L/100.
4.5 Force and displacement sensors
Force and displacement sensors shall have resolutions better than 1/1 000 of the maximum
force and deflection during the test. The accuracy of the sensors shall be within ± 1 % of the
range. The displacement sensors can be capacitive type, LVDT type, or optical type with
acceptable resolution and accuracy. In practice, the deflection can be measured from the
motion of the load tip using a capacitive sensor or from the deflection of the test piece using
an optical method.
4.6 Test environment
It is recommended to perform a test under constant temperature and humidity. Temperature
change can induce thermal drift during deflection measurement. The temperature change or
thermal drift shall be checked before and after the test.
5 Test piece
5.1 General
The test piece shall be prepared by using the same fabrication process as the actual device
fabrication. To minimize the size effect of a test piece, the structure and size of the test piece
shall be similar to those of the device components.
There are many fabrication methods of the test piece depending on the applications. As an
example, the fabrication of the test piece based on MEMS process is described in Annex B. A
lot of strip bending test pieces can be fabricated on a die or a substrate.
62047-8 Ó IEC:2011 – 7 –
5.2 Shape of test piece
The shape of test piece and symbols are given in Figure 1 and Table 1, respectively. The test
piece shall be designed to minimize the bending moment effect. In order to minimize the
effect, the maximum deflection shall be more than 40 times the thickness of the test piece,
and the length of the test piece shall be more than 300 times the thickness of the test piece,
and the width shall be more than 10 times the thickness of the test piece, and the length shall
be 10 times larger than the width. The thickness of the substrate shall be more than 500 times
that of the test piece. The dimension of the substrate is limited by the capacity of the test
apparatus. The geometry of the fixed ends supporting the test piece can affect the test results.
When etching the sacrificial layer and the supporting substrate of test pieces, the region
beneath the test pieces can be over-etched, and this is called by under-cut. The under-cut at
the fixed ends shall be minimized (anisotropic etching would be desirable rather than isotropic
etching).
IEC 499/11
Figure 1 – Thin film test piece
Table 1 – Symbols and designations of a test piece
Symbol Unit Designation
l Length of a test piece (=2L)
1 mm
l Width of a test piece (=B)
mm
l Thickness of a test piece (=h)
mm
5.3 Measurement of test piece dimension
To analyze the test results, the accurate measurement of the test piece dimensions is
required since the dimensions are used to extract mechanical properties of test materials. The
length (2L), width (B), and thickness (h) shall be measured with very high accuracy with less
than ± 5 % error. Useful information on thickness measurement can be found in Annex C of
[1] and in Clause 6 of [2].
—————————
Figures in square brackets refer to the Bibliography.
– 8 – 62047-8 Ó IEC:2011
6 Test procedure and analysis
6.1 General
a) The substrate containing test pieces is attached to a sample holder. There are some
recommendable methods for the sample attachment, such as magnetic attachment,
electrostatic gripping, adhesive gluing, etc.
b) The translational and angular misalignment between the load tip and the test piece can
affect the test results (refer to Figure C.2), and should be checked using an optical
microscope. The misalignment error and the guideline for alignment are described in
Annex C.
c) It is necessary to determine surface location of a test piece at the beginning of the test.
The surface location is the position of the top surface of the test piece in the vertical
direction when the strip deforms by the vertical movement of the load tip. This surface
location can be determined by optical inspection using an optical microscope, or be
determined by three successive indents. When the load tip touches the strip, the slight
change in the strip configuration can be observed and identified using the optical
microscope. The detailed method for determining the surface location using three
successive indents is described in A.3.
d) The test is performed under a constant displacement rate until the strip ruptures. The
-4 -3
displacement rate of L ´10 / s or L ´10 / s is recommended, which leads to the strain rate
-5 -4
of approximately 1´10 / s or 1´10 / s, respectively when the strain reaches 0,5 %. This
method applies to strain rate insensitive materials since the strain rate changes during the
test.
6.2 Data analysis
To obtain an actual force and deflection data of a test piece from the experimental results,
several compensations may be required depending on the test apparatus. As an example, the
data analysis procedures are described in Annex A for the case of a nanoindentation
apparatus. These procedures can provide useful information for other types of apparatus.
From the force and deflection measurements, stress and strain can be estimated by the
following Equations (1) and (2). The equations are derived on the assumptions of negligible
bending moment effect and uniform strain throughout the test piece [1-3]. See Figure 2.
F
s = , (1)
2Bh sin b
Lw+
e =- 1. (2)
L
Here, s is the strip stress, e is the strip strain, F is the force applied to a test piece during
-1
test and w is its corresponding deflection, b is defined as tan (w / L) . When L/h is larger than
300, these equations yield an excellent estimation of elastic modulus and yield strength as
verified in Annex C. The effect of internal stress or residual stress could be considered with
this method. When the internal stress exists, "F" in the equation (1) is affected by the internal
stress and the strip stress changes also. The buckled test piece is excluded in this standard.
62047-8 Ó IEC:2011 – 9 –
(F)
L
b
w
IEC 500/11
Figure 2 – Schematic of strip bending test
7 Test report
The test report shall contain at least the following information;
a) reference to this international standard;
b) identification number of the test piece;
c) fabrication procedures of the test piece;
d) test piece material;
– in case of single crystal: crystallographic orientation
– in case of poly crystal: texture and grain sizes
e) test piece dimension and measurement method;
f) description of testing apparatus;
g) measured properties and results: elastic modulus, tensile strength, yield strength and
stress-strain curve.
– 10 – 62047-8 Ó IEC:2011
Annex A
(informative)
Data analysis: Test results by using nanoindentation apparatus
A.1 Cause of errors
Thermal drift, difficulty of finding the surface location of the test piece and leaf spring stiffness
of test apparatus can affect the test results.
A.2 Thermal drift compensation
Thermal drift is a common cause of error for a precise sensor measurement. This error is
regarded as the result of thermal fluctuation from the test system. To measure thermal drift,
the deflection is recorded for a period of time under a load controlled condition while a test
piece is in contact with the wedge tip. Using the drift data, the deflection data of the strip
bending test are corrected. This is a common compensation method of a nanoindentation test.
Since the creep deformation is not clearly distinguished from the thermal drift, this
compensation is not used in case of a test piece with creep behaviour.
A.3 Determination of surface location
Finding the surface location of a test piece is very difficult since the stiffness change is too
small to detect when the wedge tip is in contact with the test piece. As an alternative method,
the surface locations of the two fixed strip ends to substrate are measured and the average
value of the surface locations is taken as the surface location of the strip. See Figure A.1.
This method can determine a reference surface location even for a wrinkled film caused by
compressive residual stress. The deflection of a test piece is measured from that reference
surface location.
IEC 501/11
Figure A.1 – Three successive indents for determining
the reference location of a test piece
62047-8 Ó IEC:2011 – 11 –
IEC 502/11
Figure A.2 – A schematic view of nanoindentation apparatus
(mm)
IEC 503/11
NOTE The test piece is Au film with a thickness of 0,1 mm, a width of 10 mm, and a length of 400 mm.
Figure A.3 – Actuator force vs. deflection curves
for strip bending test and for leaf spring test
A.4 Leaf spring stiffness compensation
Many commercial nanoindenation systems are utilizing a leaf spring to achieve a highly
repeatable linear motion. See Figure A.2. This apparatus applies a force on a test piece by
controlling the electric current supplied to the electromagnetic actuator. The actuator force is
obtained from the electric current multiplied by load calibration constant. The actual force on a
test piece can be determined by subtraction of the force for the leaf spring deformation from
the actuator force. The leaf spring force can be measured by moving actuator without any test
piece. This is represented by the open circle curve in Figure A.3. In order to compensate for
the leaf spring force, the force-deflection data without a test piece are subtracted from the
force-deflection data with a test piece (the filled square curve in Figure A.3). The actual force
– 12 – 62047-8 Ó IEC:2011
signal on a strip can be determined by this procedure. See Figure A.4. The detailed
information on the data analysis can be found in [3], [4] and [5].
(mm)
IEC 504/11
Figure A.4 – Force vs. deflection curve of a test piece
after compensating the stiffness of the leaf spring
(mN)
62047-8 Ó IEC:2011 – 13 –
Annex B
(informative)
Test piece fabrication: MEMS process
B.1 Test piece fabrication
MEMS processes are possible candidates for fabricating the test piece. Several types of
MEMS process can be developed depending on the test materials and the devices. Figure B.1
introduces one example among the various MEMS processes. Detail descriptions are given
below.
a) deposit oxide film on a Si wafer.
b) deposit a thin film of the test material on the oxide film. Au, Mo, SiNx can be used as a
test material. A glue layer may be deposited to improve adhesion between oxide film and
thin film. The thickness of the glue layer must be carefully chosen to minimize its stiffness
effect on the measurement.
c) pattern the metal film to define the shape of a test piece. The patterning is done by a
photolithography process.
d) protect the patterned test piece by oxide or photoresist passivation layer.
e) to make freestanding films, Si substrate is etched from back side by using deep RIE.
f) freestanding film is obtained by removing photoresist and oxide.
IEC 505/11
Figure B.1 – Fabrication procedure for test piece
– 14 – 62047-8 Ó IEC:2011
B.2 Measurement of shape of test piece
The shape of test piece can be measured by various methods. Stylus profilers or AFM (atomic
force microscope) can be used to measure the thickness of a test piece. The width and length
of a test piece are measured by electron microscope or even optical microscope. In case of a
wrinkled film caused by compressive residual stress, the length between the fixed ends of
strip to substrate is taken as the length of a test piece.
62047-8 Ó IEC:2011 – 15 –
Annex C
(informative)
Effect of misalignment and geometry on property measurement
C.1 Background
The results obtained by the strip bending test can be affected by several error sources. Some
of them are the geometry of a test piece and others are translational and angular
misalignments. Using finite element simulation, the effects of these error sources are
estimated, and useful guidelines for the test are suggested. The test piece has three length
parameters, length, width and thickness. The effects of these parameters are estimated under
perfect alignment in terms of the error in elastic modulus and yield strength. The errors due to
the translational and angular misalignments are estimated. The details on the simulation can
be found in [6].
C.2 Finite element analysis
Three-dimensional finite element models are generated for the strip bending test pieces and
are simulated using commercial finite element software, such as e.g. ABAQUS. By performing
a mesh convergence study, the suitable finite element model is selected, which gives a
convergent numerical solution. The material properties are adopted from the tensile test
results [7] of Au thin film with a thickness of 1 mm, and the constitutive models for the
simulation are elasticity and incremental plasticity. Using the finite element simulation, the
force and deflection data for a test piece are extracted, and the corresponding stress and
stress data are evaluated using the equations in 4.2. Elastic modulus and yield strength (0,2%
offset) can be calculated from the evaluated stress-strain data. The error is estimated from
the difference between the calculated ones and the simulation inputs.
C.3 Analysis results
The errors in elastic modulus and yield strength under perfect alignment are estimated from
the finite element analysis and are plotted in Figure C.1. As the increase in length/thickness
ratio, the errors in elastic modulus and yield strength decreases, and the estimated properties
are a little less than the actual properties. When the length/thickness ratio is larger than 300,
the errors become less than 1 %.
– 16 – 62047-8 Ó IEC:2011
B/h = 10
6 B/h = 20
B/h = 30
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
0 100 200 300 400 500
Aspect ratio (L/h)
IEC 506/11
Figure C.1a) Finite element analysis of errors in elastic modulus with respect
to aspect ratio (= length/thickness)
B/h = 10
B/h = 20
B/h = 30
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
0 100 200 300 400 500
Aspect ratio (L/h)
IEC 507/11
Figure C.1b) Finite element analysis of errors in yield strength evaluation with respect
to aspect ratio (= length/thickness)
Figure C.1 – Finite element analysis of errors based on the constitutive data
of Au thin film of 1 mm thick
Yield stress error, % Elastic modulus error, %
62047-8 Ó IEC:2011 – 17 –
The translational and angular misalignments are also analyzed for the configuration shown in
Figure C.2. Based on the simulation results, it is found that the effect of the translational
misalignment (d) on elastic modulus and strength is less than 0,1% when d is less than L/100.
Among the angular misalignments, a has the most significant effect on the results, and the
error caused by a increases as the width, B. When B/h is 10 and a is less than 1 degree, the
errors in elastic modulus and yield strength is less than 0,5 %. The effects of b and g on the
elastic modulus and yield strength is less than 0,1 % when they are less than 1 degree.
The effect of the load-tip radius on elastic modulus and strength evaluation is also estimated.
As the radius increases, the errors in elastic modulus and strength also increase. The error in
strength grows faster than that in elastic modulus. When the radius is less than L/50, the
errors are less than 0,5 %.
IEC 508/11
Figure C.2 – Translational (d) and angular (a, b, g) misalignments
– 18 – 62047-8 Ó IEC:2011
Bibliography
[1] IEC 62047-2:2006, Semiconductor devices – Micro-electromechanical devices – Part 2:
Tensile testing method of thin film materials.
[2] IEC 62047-3:2006, Semiconductor devices – Micro-electromechanical devices – Part 3:
Thin film standard test piece for tensile testing.
[3] Espinosa, H. D., Prorok, B. C., Fisher, M., A methodology for determining mechanical
properties of freestanding thin films and MEMS materials, Journal of the Mechanics and
Physics of Solids, Vol. 51 (2003), pp. 47-67.
[4] Baek, C. W., Kim, J. M., Kim, Y. K., Kim, J.-H., Lee, H.-J., Han, S.-W., Mechanical
Characterization of Gold Thin Films Based on Strip Bending and Nanoindentation Test
for MEMS/NEMS Applications, Sensors and Materials, Vol. 17 (2005), pp. 277-288.
[5] Kim, J.-H., Lee, H.-J., Han, S.-W., Kim, J. M., Baek, C. W., Residual Stress Evaluation
of Thin Film Using Strip Bending Test, Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 321-323 (2006),
pp. 121-124.
[6] Park, J.-M., Kim, J.-H., Lee, H.-J., A study on error sources of strip bending test using
finite element analysis, Proc. of KSPE 2007 fall meeting (2007).
[7] Lee, S.-J., Hyun, S.-M., Han, S.-W., Lee, H.-J., Kim, J. H., Kim, Y. I., A Study of
Mechanical Behavior of Au Films by Visual Image Tracing System, Advanced Materials
Research, Vols. 26-28 (2007), pp. 1117-1120.
____________
– 20 – 62047-8 Ó CEI:2011
SOMMAIRE
AVANT-PROPOS . 21
1 Domaine d'application . 23
2 Références normatives . 23
3 Termes et définitions . 23
4 Appareillage d’essai . 24
4.1 Généralités. 24
4.2 Actionneur . 24
4.3 Extrémité de charge . 24
4.4 Mécanisme d’alignement . 24
4.5 Capteurs de force et de déplacement . 24
4.6 Environnement d’essai . 24
5 Éprouvette d’essai . 25
5.1 Généralités. 25
5.2 Forme de l’éprouvette d’essai . 25
5.3 Mesure des dimensions de l’éprouvette d’essai . 26
6 Procédure d’essai et analyse . 26
6.1 Généralités. 26
6.2 Analyse de données . 26
7 Rapport d’essai . 27
Annexe A (informative) Analyse de données: Résultats d’essai au moyen de l’appareil
de nanopénétration . 28
Annexe B (informative) Fabrication de l’éprouvette d’essai: procédé MEMS . 31
Annexe C (informative) Effet de désalignement et géométrie sur la mesure des
propriétés . 33
Bibliographie . 36
Figure 1 – Eprouvette d’essai en couche mince . 25
Figure 2 – Schéma d’essai de courbure de bande . 27
Figure A.1 – Trois encoches successives en vue de déterminer l’emplacement de
référence d’une éprouvette . 28
Figure A.2 – Vue schématique d’un appareil de nanopénétration . 29
Figure A.3 – Courbes de force de l’actionneur par rapport à la flèche pour l'essai de
courbure de bande et pour l’essai de ressort à lames . 29
Figure A.4 – Courbe de force par rapport à la flèche d’une éprouvette après la
compensation de la rigidité du ressort à lames. 30
Figure B.1 – Procédure de fabrication de l'éprouvette d’essai . 32
Figure C.1 – Analyse par éléments finis des erreurs fondée sur les données
constitutives de la couche mince en Au de 1 mm d’épaisseur . 34
Figure C.2 – Désalignements de translation (d) et angulaires (a, b, g) . 35
Tableau 1 – Symboles et désignations d’une éprouvette d’essai . 25
62047-8 Ó CEI:2011 – 21 –
COMMISSION ÉLECTROTECHNIQUE INTERNATIONALE
____________
DISPOSITIFS À SEMICONDUCTEURS –
DISPOSITIFS MICROÉLECTROMÉCANIQUES –
Partie 8: Méthode d’essai de la flexion de bandes en vue
de la mesure des propriétés de traction des couches minces
AVANT-PROPOS
1) La Commission Electrotechnique Internationale (CEI) est une organisation mondiale de normalisation
composée de l'ensemble des comités électrotechniques nationaux (Comités nationaux de la CEI). La CEI a
pour objet de favoriser la coopération internationale pour toutes les questions de normalisation dans les
domaines de l'électricité et de l'électronique. A cet effet, la CEI – entre autres activités – publie des Normes
internationales, des Spécifications techniques, des Rapports techniques, des Spécifications accessibles au
public (PAS) et des Guides (ci-après dénommés "Publication(s) de la CEI"). Leur élaboration est confiée à des
comités d'études, aux travaux desquels tout Comité national intéressé par le sujet traité peut participer. Les
organisations internationales, gouvernementales et non gouvernementales, en liaison avec la CEI, participent
également aux travaux. La CEI collabore étroitement avec l'Organisation Internationale de Normalisation (ISO),
selon des conditions fixées par accord entre les deux organisations.
2) Les décisions ou accords officiels de la CEI concernant les questions techniques représentent, dans la mesure
du possible, un accord international sur les sujets étudiés, étant donné que les Comités nationaux de la CEI
intéressés sont représentés dans chaque comité d’études.
3) Les Publications de la CEI se présentent sous la forme de recommandations internationales et sont agréées
comme telles par les Comités nationaux de la CEI. Tous les efforts raisonnables sont entrepris afin que la CEI
s'assure de l'exactitude du contenu technique de ses publications; la CEI ne peut pas être tenue responsable
de l'éventuelle mauvaise utilisation ou interprétation qui en est faite par un quelconque utilisateur final.
4) Dans le but d'encourager l'uniformité internationale, les Comités nationaux de la CEI s'engagent, dans toute la
mesure possible, à appliquer de façon transparente les Publications de la CEI dans leurs publications
nationales et régionales. Toutes divergences entre toutes Publications de la CEI et toutes publications
nationales ou régionales correspondantes doivent être indiquées en termes clairs dans ces dernières.
5) La CEI elle-même ne fournit aucune attestation de conformité. Des organismes de certification indépendants
fournissent des services d'évaluation de conformité et, dans certains secteurs, accèdent aux marques de
conformité de la CEI. La CEI n'est responsable d'aucun des services effectués par les organismes de
certification indépendants.
6) Tous les utilisateurs doivent s'assurer qu'ils sont en possession de la dernière édition de cette publication.
7) Aucune responsabilité ne doit être imputée à la CEI, à ses administrateurs, employés, auxiliaires ou
mandataires, y compris ses experts particuliers et les membres de ses comités d'études et des Comités
nationaux de la CEI, pour tout préjudice causé en cas de dommages corporels et matériels, ou de tout autre
dommage de quelque nature que ce soit, directe ou indirecte, ou pour supporter les coûts (y compris les frais
de justice) et les dépenses découlant de la publication ou de l'utilisation de cette Publication de la CEI ou de
toute autre Publication de la
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...