ASTM A745/A745M-20
(Practice)Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Steel Forgings
Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Steel Forgings
ABSTRACT
This test method deals with the procedures for the standard practice of performing contact, pulse-echo ultrasonic examination of austenitic steel forgings by the straight and angle beam techniques. This practice does not cover the ultrasonic examination of nonmagnetic retaining ring forgings. The instrument used for this test method shall be the electronic pulsed reflection type. Prior to examination, specimens shall be heat treated and machined to a rectangular, parallel, or concentric surface configuration, and its surface shall be free of extraneous material such as loose scale, paint, and dirt. Calibration of the apparatus shall be done by either the single-block method or distance-amplitude curve method. Choice of method to be employed shall be determined by the test metal distance involved. Quality levels for acceptance, established by the type and amount of indication present, are detailed thoroughly.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice2 covers straight and angle beam contact, pulse-echo ultrasonic examination of austenitic steel forgings produced in accordance with Practice A388/A388M and Specifications A965/A965M and A1049/A1049M.
1.2 Ultrasonic examination of nonmagnetic retaining ring forgings should be made to Practice A531/A531M rather than this practice.
1.3 Supplementary requirements of an optional nature are provided for use at the option of the purchaser. The supplementary requirements shall apply only when specified individually by the purchaser in the purchase order or contract.
1.4 This practice is expressed in inch-pound and SI units; however, unless the purchase order or contract specifies the applicable “M” specification designation (SI units), the inch-pound units shall apply. The values stated in either inch-pound units or SI units are to be regarded separately as standard. Within the practice, the SI units are shown in brackets. The values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall be used independently of the other, and values from the two systems shall not be combined.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 30-Apr-2020
- Technical Committee
- A01 - Steel, Stainless Steel and Related Alloys
- Drafting Committee
- A01.06 - Steel Forgings and Billets
Relations
- Replaces
ASTM A745/A745M-15 - Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Steel Forgings - Effective Date
- 01-May-2020
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2019
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2019
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Sep-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2017
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2017
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2016
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2015
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2015
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2014
- Effective Date
- 15-May-2014
Overview
ASTM A745/A745M-20 outlines the standard practice for conducting ultrasonic examination of austenitic steel forgings using contact, pulse-echo techniques. This practice is essential for quality assurance in industries where the integrity of steel forgings is critical, including pressure vessels and high-temperature parts. The standard covers both straight and angle beam ultrasonic examination, specifying requirements for apparatus calibration, test procedures, qualification of personnel, and acceptance criteria for discontinuities.
This practice is specifically designed for austenitic steel forgings produced in accordance with ASTM A388/A388M, A965/A965M, and A1049/A1049M specifications. It does not apply to the ultrasonic examination of nonmagnetic retaining ring forgings, for which ASTM A531/A531M should be used.
Key Topics
Ultrasonic Examination Techniques
- Pulse-echo ultrasonic testing using straight and angle beam approaches.
- Examination performed after heat treatment and machining.
- Requirement for surface cleanliness and appropriate surface finish.
Calibration and Equipment
- Use of electronic pulsed reflection instruments.
- Calibration methods include single-block and distance-amplitude curve (DAC).
- Regular calibration and verification for consistent results.
Personnel Qualification
- Examiners must be qualified and certified following established nondestructive testing standards, such as recommended practices by ASNT.
Evaluation and Acceptance Criteria
- Defines multiple quality levels based on indication size and type, with specific acceptance standards for both straight and angle beam examinations.
- Reportable indication protocols guide documentation of detected discontinuities.
Units and Documentation
- Practice expressed in both inch-pound and SI units; each to be used independently for compliance.
- Comprehensive reporting requirements detail findings, scanning patterns, and procedures.
Applications
Ultrasonic examination per ASTM A745/A745M-20 is widely applied in industries such as:
Power Generation
- Inspection of austenitic steel forgings for turbines, generators, and pressure vessel components.
Oil and Gas
- Assessment of forged components used in high-pressure and high-temperature environments.
Aerospace and Heavy Engineering
- Ensuring structural quality and reliability of critical forged parts.
Manufacturing Quality Control
- Prevention of defects associated with forging, such as cracks, inclusions, or laminations, prior to final use.
- Provides suppliers and end-users with a reliable method to comply with customer and regulatory requirements.
This standard helps to ensure that only forgings meeting stringent quality standards are put into service, enhancing safety and performance while reducing costly failures.
Related Standards
When implementing ASTM A745/A745M-20, consider related standards for comprehensive nondestructive examination:
- ASTM A388/A388M - Ultrasonic Examination of Steel Forgings
- ASTM A965/A965M - Austenitic Steel Forgings for Pressure and High-Temperature Parts
- ASTM A1049/A1049M - Stainless Steel Forgings for Pressure Vessels and Related Components
- ASTM A531/A531M - Ultrasonic Examination of Turbine-Generator Steel Retaining Rings (for nonmagnetic rings)
- ASTM E317 - Evaluating Performance Characteristics of Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Instruments
- ASNT SNT-TC-1A - Qualifications and Certification of Nondestructive Testing Personnel
- ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code - For applications covered under ASME compliance
Practical Value
Implementing ASTM A745/A745M-20 streamlines ultrasonic examination processes, enhances traceability, and ensures consistent product quality. By using this standard, manufacturers and purchasers of austenitic steel forgings can be confident in the integrity and service-readiness of their components, reducing the risk of failure and supporting industry best practices in nondestructive testing.
Buy Documents
ASTM A745/A745M-20 - Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Steel Forgings
REDLINE ASTM A745/A745M-20 - Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Steel Forgings
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

Element Materials Technology
Materials testing and product certification.
Inštitut za kovinske materiale in tehnologije
Institute of Metals and Technology. Materials testing, metallurgical analysis, NDT.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM A745/A745M-20 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Steel Forgings". This standard covers: ABSTRACT This test method deals with the procedures for the standard practice of performing contact, pulse-echo ultrasonic examination of austenitic steel forgings by the straight and angle beam techniques. This practice does not cover the ultrasonic examination of nonmagnetic retaining ring forgings. The instrument used for this test method shall be the electronic pulsed reflection type. Prior to examination, specimens shall be heat treated and machined to a rectangular, parallel, or concentric surface configuration, and its surface shall be free of extraneous material such as loose scale, paint, and dirt. Calibration of the apparatus shall be done by either the single-block method or distance-amplitude curve method. Choice of method to be employed shall be determined by the test metal distance involved. Quality levels for acceptance, established by the type and amount of indication present, are detailed thoroughly. SCOPE 1.1 This practice2 covers straight and angle beam contact, pulse-echo ultrasonic examination of austenitic steel forgings produced in accordance with Practice A388/A388M and Specifications A965/A965M and A1049/A1049M. 1.2 Ultrasonic examination of nonmagnetic retaining ring forgings should be made to Practice A531/A531M rather than this practice. 1.3 Supplementary requirements of an optional nature are provided for use at the option of the purchaser. The supplementary requirements shall apply only when specified individually by the purchaser in the purchase order or contract. 1.4 This practice is expressed in inch-pound and SI units; however, unless the purchase order or contract specifies the applicable “M” specification designation (SI units), the inch-pound units shall apply. The values stated in either inch-pound units or SI units are to be regarded separately as standard. Within the practice, the SI units are shown in brackets. The values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall be used independently of the other, and values from the two systems shall not be combined. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ABSTRACT This test method deals with the procedures for the standard practice of performing contact, pulse-echo ultrasonic examination of austenitic steel forgings by the straight and angle beam techniques. This practice does not cover the ultrasonic examination of nonmagnetic retaining ring forgings. The instrument used for this test method shall be the electronic pulsed reflection type. Prior to examination, specimens shall be heat treated and machined to a rectangular, parallel, or concentric surface configuration, and its surface shall be free of extraneous material such as loose scale, paint, and dirt. Calibration of the apparatus shall be done by either the single-block method or distance-amplitude curve method. Choice of method to be employed shall be determined by the test metal distance involved. Quality levels for acceptance, established by the type and amount of indication present, are detailed thoroughly. SCOPE 1.1 This practice2 covers straight and angle beam contact, pulse-echo ultrasonic examination of austenitic steel forgings produced in accordance with Practice A388/A388M and Specifications A965/A965M and A1049/A1049M. 1.2 Ultrasonic examination of nonmagnetic retaining ring forgings should be made to Practice A531/A531M rather than this practice. 1.3 Supplementary requirements of an optional nature are provided for use at the option of the purchaser. The supplementary requirements shall apply only when specified individually by the purchaser in the purchase order or contract. 1.4 This practice is expressed in inch-pound and SI units; however, unless the purchase order or contract specifies the applicable “M” specification designation (SI units), the inch-pound units shall apply. The values stated in either inch-pound units or SI units are to be regarded separately as standard. Within the practice, the SI units are shown in brackets. The values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall be used independently of the other, and values from the two systems shall not be combined. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ASTM A745/A745M-20 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 77.040.20 - Non-destructive testing of metals; 77.140.85 - Iron and steel forgings. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM A745/A745M-20 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM A745/A745M-15, ASTM A965/A965M-23, ASTM A388/A388M-23, ASTM A788/A788M-19, ASTM A965/A965M-14(2019), ASTM A788/A788M-18b, ASTM A788/A788M-18a, ASTM A788/A788M-18, ASTM A788/A788M-17a, ASTM A788/A788M-17, ASTM A788/A788M-16a, ASTM A788/A788M-15, ASTM A1049/A1049M-10(2015), ASTM A788/A788M-14a, ASTM A788/A788M-14. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM A745/A745M-20 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: A745/A745M − 20
Standard Practice for
Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Steel Forgings
This standard is issued under the fixed designationA745/A745M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year
of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.
A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope* 2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.1 This practice covers straight and angle beam contact,
A388/A388M Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of Steel
pulse-echo ultrasonic examination of austenitic steel forgings
Forgings
producedinaccordancewithPracticeA388/A388MandSpeci-
A531/A531M Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of
fications A965/A965M and A1049/A1049M.
Turbine-Generator Steel Retaining Rings
1.2 Ultrasonic examination of nonmagnetic retaining ring
A788/A788M Specification for Steel Forgings, General Re-
forgings should be made to Practice A531/A531M rather than
quirements
this practice.
A965/A965M Specification for Steel Forgings, Austenitic,
for Pressure and High Temperature Parts
1.3 Supplementary requirements of an optional nature are
A1049/A1049M Specification for Stainless Steel Forgings,
provided for use at the option of the purchaser. The supple-
Ferritic/Austenitic (Duplex), for Pressure Vessels and
mentary requirements shall apply only when specified indi-
Related Components
vidually by the purchaser in the purchase order or contract.
E317 Practice for Evaluating Performance Characteristics of
1.4 This practice is expressed in inch-pound and SI units;
Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Testing Instruments and Systems
however, unless the purchase order or contract specifies the
without the Use of Electronic Measurement Instruments
applicable “M” specification designation (SI units), the inch-
E428 Practice for Fabrication and Control of Metal, Other
pound units shall apply. The values stated in either inch-pound
than Aluminum, Reference Blocks Used in Ultrasonic
units or SI units are to be regarded separately as standard. 4
Testing (Withdrawn 2019)
Within the practice, the SI units are shown in brackets. The
2.2 ASME Code:
values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equiva-
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
lents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each
system shall be used independently of the other, and values 2.3 American Society for Nondestructive Testing Docu-
from the two systems shall not be combined. ment:
SNT-TC-1A RecommendedPracticeforNondestructivePer-
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the
sonnel Qualification and Certification
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
3. Ordering Information
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
3.1 When this practice is to be applied to an inquiry or
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
purchase order, the purchaser shall furnish the following
1.6 This international standard was developed in accor-
information:
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
3.1.1 Quality level of examination (see Section 12).
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
3.1.2 Additional requirements to this practice.
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee A01 on Steel, the ASTM website.
Stainless Steel and Related Alloys and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
A01.06 on Steel Forgings and Billets. www.astm.org.
Current edition approved May 1, 2020. Published June 2020. Originally Available from American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), ASME
approved in 1977. Last previous edition approved in 2015 as A745/A745M-15. International Headquarters, Two Park Ave., New York, NY 10016-5990, http://
DOI: 10.1520/A0745_A0745M-20. www.asme.org.
2 6
For ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code applications, see related Specifi- AvailablefromAmericanSocietyforNondestructiveTesting(ASNT),P.O.Box
cation SA-745/SA-745M in Section II of that Code. 28518, 1711 Arlingate Ln., Columbus, OH 43228-0518, http://www.asnt.org.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
A745/A745M − 20
3.1.3 Applicability of supplementary requirements (see ments of Practice E317 (in each case, accurate within 65%)
Supplementary Requirements section). that will allow indications beyond the linear range of the
instrument to be measured. It is recommended that these
3.1.4 Supplementary requirements, if any.
controls permit signal adjustments up to 25 to 1 (28 dB).
3.2 When specified, the manufacturer shall submit an ex-
amination procedure for purchaser approval that shall include, 4.4 Search Units:
but not be limited to, a sketch of the configuration as presented 4.4.1 The maximum nominal active area of 1 ⁄2 in.
1 1
for ultrasonic examination showing the surfaces to be scanned, [970 mm ] with ⁄2 in. [13 mm] minimum to 1 ⁄8 in. [30 mm]
scanning directions, notch locations and sizes (if applicable), maximum dimensions or ⁄4 in. [20 mm] diameter minimum
extent of coverage (if applicable), and an instruction listing dimension shall be used for straight-beam scanning.
calibration and inspection details and stage of manufacture. 4.4.2 Angle-beam scanning transducers shall have a nomi-
2 2
nal active area of ⁄2 in. to 1 in. [325 mm to 650 mm ]. The
4. Apparatus search unit used for angle-beam examination shall produce a
beam angle of 30 to 70° in the material.
4.1 Electronic Apparatus—Apulse-echo instrument permit-
4.4.3 Other search units, including frequencies other than
tinginspectionfrequenciesof1 MHz,2.25 MHz,and5MHzis
those listed in Section 8, may be used for evaluating and
required. The accuracy of discontinuity amplitude analysis
pinpointing indications of discontinuities.
using this practice involves a knowledge of the true operating
frequency of the complete inspection system. One of the best
4.5 Couplant—A suitable couplant having good wetting
ways to obtain the desired accuracy is by use of a tuned pulser
characteristics shall be used between the transducer and the
and narrow band amplifier of known frequency response, with
examination surface. The same couplant shall be used for
either a broadband transducer, or a narrow-band tuned trans-
calibration and examination.
ducer of known and matching frequency.
4.6 Reference Blocks:
4.1.1 Apparatus Qualification and Calibration—Basic
4.6.1 All ultrasonic standard reference blocks shall be in
qualification of the ultrasonic test instrument shall be per-
accordance with the general guidelines of Practice E428.
formed at intervals not to exceed 12 months or whenever
However, absolute conformance to Practice E428 is not man-
maintenance is performed that affects the equipment function.
datory due to the nature of the material covered by this
Thedateofthelastcalibrationandthedateofthenextrequired
practice.
calibration shall be displayed on the test equipment.
4.6.2 The reference block grain size, as measured by the
4.1.2 The horizontal linearity shall be checked on a distance
relative acoustic penetrability of the reference blocks, should
calibration bar using the multiple order technique (see Practice
be reasonably similar to the forging under examination.
E317). The horizontal linearity shall be 62 % of the metal
However, it must be recognized that large austenitic forgings
path.
vary considerably in acoustic penetrability throughout their
4.1.3 The accuracy of the linearity shall be checked by
volume due to variations in grain size and structure. Reference
ultrasonically verifying the thickness of the component in at
blocks should be chosen that reasonably approximate the
least one location beyond the near field of the transducer. If
average penetrability of the forging under examination.
necessary, minor adjustments for differences in the ultrasonic
Supplementary blocks of coarser or finer grain may be used for
velocitiesbetweenthecalibrationbarandtheforgingshallthen
evaluation of indications as covered in Section 11.
be made.
4.6.3 As an alternative method, where practicable, the
4.2 Amplifier—The amplifier and display shall provide lin-
appropriate size of reference hole (or holes) or notches may be
ear response within 62 %, up to 100 % of full screen height.
placed in representative areas of the forging for calibration and
4.2.1 Amplifier Calibration—An amplifier vertical linearity
examination purposes when removed by subsequent machin-
check shall be made prior to performing the test by observing
ing. When holes or notches are not removed by subsequent
a multiple order pattern from a calibration block using a
machining, the purchaser must approve the location of holes or
2.25 MHz transducer (see Practice E317). The first back
notches.
reflectionshallbesetat100%offullscreenheight.Thehigher
order back reflections, 10 % and higher in amplitude, shall also
5. Personnel Requirements
be positioned on the screen and their amplitudes noted. The
5.1 Personnelperformingtheultrasonicexaminationstothis
first back reflection shall be reduced to 50 % and then 25 % of
practice shall be qualified and certified in accordance with a
full screen height. The amplitudes of the higher order back
written procedure conforming to Recommended Practice No.
reflections shall be noted at each step. The vertical linearity
SNT-TC-1A or another national standard that is acceptable to
will be considered acceptable if the signal heights of the higher
both the purchaser and the supplier.
order reflections decrease in proportion to the decrease set for
the first back reflection. The maximum acceptable error for the
6. Forging Conditions
decrease of the higher order reflections is the greater of 65%
of the expected back reflection height or 62 % of full screen 6.1 Forgings shall be ultrasonically examined after heat
treating.
height.
4.3 Signal Attenuator—The instrument shall contain a cali- 6.2 The surfaces of the forging to be examined shall be free
brated gain control or signal attenuator that meets the require- of extraneous material such as loose scale, paint, dirt, etc.
A745/A745M − 20
6.3 The surface roughness of scanning surfaces shall not circuitryisusedthatnormalizestheamplitudeofeachreflector,
exceed 250 µin. [6 µm] unless otherwise stated in the order or such asTCG, the reflector with the lowest response shall be set
contract where the definition for surface finish is as per at 80 % FSH.
Specification A788/A788M.
8. Examination Frequency
6.4 The forgings shall be machined to a simple
8.1 Perform all ultrasonic examination at the highest fre-
configuration, that is, rectangular or parallel or concentric
quency practicable (as specified in 8.1.1, 8.1.2,or 8.1.3) that
surfaces where complete volumetric coverage can be obtained.
will adequately penetrate the forging thickness and resolve the
6.5 In certain cases, such as with contour forged parts, it
applicable reference standard. Include in the ultrasonic exami-
may be impractical to assure 100 % volumetric coverage. Such
nation report the examination frequency used. Determine the
forgings shall be examined to the maximum extent possible.A
test frequency at the time of actual examination by the
procedure indicating the extent of examination coverage shall
following guidelines:
be submitted for the purchaser’s approval (see 3.2).
8.1.1 The nominal test frequency shall be 2.25 MHz. Use of
this frequency will generally be restricted due to attenuation.
7. Procedure 8.1.2 Onemegahertzisacceptableandwillbethefrequency
generally applicable.
7.1 Perform the ultrasonic examination after heat treatment
8.1.3 When necessary, due to attenuation, 0.5 MHz exami-
when the forging is machined to the ultrasonic configuration
nation frequency may be used. The purchaser may request
but prior to drilling holes, cutting keyways, tapers, grooves, or
notification before this lower frequency is employed.
machining sections to final contour.
8.1.4 In the event that adequate penetration of certain
7.2 To ensure complete coverage of the forging volume
regions is not possible even at 0.5 MHz, alternative nonde-
whenscanning,indexthesearchunitwithatleast15 %overlap
structive examination methods (such as radiography) may be
with each pass.
employed to ensure the soundness of the forging by agreement
between the purchaser and the manufacturer.
7.3 The scanning rate shall not exceed 6 in. [150 mm]/s.
7.4 Scan all regions of the forging in at least two perpen- 9. Straight-Beam Examination
dicular directions to the maximum extent possible.
9.1 Method of Calibration:
9.1.1 Perform calibration for straight-beam examination on
7.5 Scan disk and disk-type forgings using a straight beam
the flat-bottom hole size determined by the applicable quality
from at least one flat face and radially from the circumference
level (see Section 12).
when practicable. For the purposes of this practice, a disk is a
9.1.2 Determine the calibration method by the test metal
cylindrical shape where the diameter dimension exceeds the
distance involved.
height dimension. Disk-type forgings made as upset-forged
9.1.2.1 Thicknesses up to 6 in. [150 mm] may be examined
“pancakes” shall be classified as disks for inspection purposes
using either the single-block or the distance-amplitude curve
although at the time of inspection, the part may have a center
calibration method.
hole, counterturned steps, or other detail configuration.
(a) Single-Block Method—Establish the test sensitivity on
7.6 Scan cylindrical sections, ring and hollow forgings from
the reference standard representing the forging thickness. Drill
the entire external surface (sides or circumference), using the
flat-bottom holes normal to the examining surface, to midsec-
straight-beam technique, and scan the forging in the axial
tion in material up to 1.5
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: A745/A745M − 15 A745/A745M − 20
Standard Practice for
Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Steel Forgings
This standard is issued under the fixed designation A745/A745M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year
of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.
A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope*
1.1 This practice covers straight and angle beam contact, pulse-echo ultrasonic examination of austenitic steel forgings
produced in accordance with Practice A388/A388M and Specifications A965/A965M and A1049/A1049M.
1.2 Ultrasonic examination of nonmagnetic retaining ring forgings should be made to Practice A531/A531M rather than this
practice.
1.3 Supplementary requirements of an optional nature are provided for use at the option of the purchaser. The supplementary
requirements shall apply only when specified individually by the purchaser in the purchase order or contract.
1.4 This practice is expressed in inch-pound and SI units; however, unless the purchase order or contract specifies the applicable
“M” specification designation (SI units), the inch-pound units shall apply. The values stated in either inch-pound units or SI units
are to be regarded separately as standard. Within the practice, the SI units are shown in brackets. The values stated in each system
mayare not benecessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall be used
independently of the other. Combiningother, and values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the
standard.shall not be combined.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
A388/A388M Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of Steel Forgings
A531/A531M Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of Turbine-Generator Steel Retaining Rings
A788/A788M Specification for Steel Forgings, General Requirements
A965/A965M Specification for Steel Forgings, Austenitic, for Pressure and High Temperature Parts
A1049/A1049M Specification for Stainless Steel Forgings, Ferritic/Austenitic (Duplex), for Pressure Vessels and Related
Components
E317 Practice for Evaluating Performance Characteristics of Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Testing Instruments and Systems without the
Use of Electronic Measurement Instruments
E428 Practice for Fabrication and Control of Metal, Other than Aluminum, Reference Blocks Used in Ultrasonic Testing
(Withdrawn 2019)
2.2 ASME Code:
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee A01 on Steel, Stainless Steel and Related Alloys and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee A01.06
on Steel Forgings and Billets.
Current edition approved May 1, 2015May 1, 2020. Published May 2015June 2020. Originally approved in 1977. Last previous edition approved in 20122015 as
A745/A745M – 12.A745/A745M-15. DOI: 10.1520/A0745_A0745M-15.10.1520/A0745_A0745M-20.
For ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code applications, see related Specification SA-745/SA-745M in Section II of that Code.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’sstandard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on www.astm.org.
Available from American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), ASME International Headquarters, Two Park Ave., New York, NY 10016-5990, http://
www.asme.org.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
A745/A745M − 20
2.3 American Society for Nondestructive Testing Document:
SNT-TC-1A Recommended Practice for Nondestructive Personnel Qualification and Certification
3. Ordering Information
3.1 When this practice is to be applied to an inquiry or purchase order, the purchaser shall furnish the following information:
3.1.1 Quality level of examination (see Section 12).
3.1.2 Additional requirements to this practice.
3.1.3 Applicability of supplementary requirements (see Supplementary Requirements section).
3.1.4 Supplementary requirements, if any.
3.2 When specified, the manufacturer shall submit an examination procedure for purchaser approval that shall include, but not
be limited to, a sketch of the configuration as presented for ultrasonic examination showing the surfaces to be scanned, scanning
directions, notch locations and sizes (if applicable), extent of coverage (if applicable), and an instruction listing calibration and
inspection details and stage of manufacture.
4. Apparatus
4.1 Electronic Apparatus—A pulse-echo instrument permitting inspection frequencies of 1, 2.25,1 MHz, 2.25 MHz, and 5 MHz
is required. The accuracy of discontinuity amplitude analysis using this practice involves a knowledge of the true operating
frequency of the complete inspection system. One of the best ways to obtain the desired accuracy is by use of a tuned pulser and
narrow band amplifier of known frequency response, with either a broadband transducer, or a narrow-band tuned transducer of
known and matching frequency.
4.1.1 Apparatus Qualification and Calibration—Basic qualification of the ultrasonic test instrument shall be performed at
intervals not to exceed 12 months or whenever maintenance is performed that affects the equipment function. The date of the last
calibration and the date of the next required calibration shall be displayed on the test equipment.
4.1.2 The horizontal linearity shall be checked on a distance calibration bar using the multiple order technique (see Practice
E317). The horizontal linearity shall be 62 % of the metal path.
4.1.3 The accuracy of the linearity shall be checked by ultrasonically verifying the thickness of the component in at least one
location beyond the near field of the transducer. If necessary, minor adjustments for differences in the ultrasonic velocities between
the calibration bar and the forging shall then be made.
4.2 Amplifier—The amplifier and display shall provide linear response within 62 %, up to 100 % of full screen height.
4.2.1 Amplifier Calibration—An amplifier vertical linearity check shall be made prior to performing the test by observing a
multiple order pattern from a calibration block using a 2.25 MHz 2.25 MHz transducer (see Practice E317). The first back reflection
shall be set at 100 % of full screen height. The higher order back reflections, 10 % and higher in amplitude, shall also be positioned
on the screen and their amplitudes noted. The first back reflection shall be reduced to 50 % and then 25 % of full screen height.
The amplitudes of the higher order back reflections shall be noted at each step. The vertical linearity will be considered acceptable
if the signal heights of the higher order reflections decrease in proportion to the decrease set for the first back reflection. The
maximum acceptable error for the decrease of the higher order reflections is the greater of 65 % of the expected back reflection
height or 62 % of full screen height.
4.3 Signal Attenuator—The instrument shall contain a calibrated gain control or signal attenuator that meets the requirements
of Practice E317 (in each case, accurate within 65 %) that will allow indications beyond the linear range of the instrument to be
measured. It is recommended that these controls permit signal adjustments up to 25 to 1 (28 dB).
4.4 Search Units:
2 2
1 1 1
4.4.1 The maximum nominal active area of 1 ⁄2 in. [970 mm[970 mm ] with ⁄2-in. in. [13 mm] minimum to 1 ⁄8-in. in. [30 mm]
maximum dimensions or ⁄4-in. in. [20 mm] diameter minimum dimension shall be used for straight-beam scanning.
2 2
4.4.2 Angle-beam scanning transducers shall have a nominal active area of ⁄2 in. to 1 in. [325[325 mm to 650 mm ]. The
search unit used for angle-beam examination shall produce a beam angle of 30 to 70° in the material.
4.4.3 Other search units, including frequencies other than those listed in Section 8, may be used for evaluating and pinpointing
indications of discontinuities.
4.5 Couplant—A suitable couplant having good wetting characteristics shall be used between the transducer and the
examination surface. The same couplant shall be used for calibration and examination.
4.6 Reference Blocks:
4.6.1 All ultrasonic standard reference blocks shall be in accordance with the general guidelines of Practice E428. However,
absolute conformance to Practice E428 is not mandatory due to the nature of the material covered by this practice.
4.6.2 The reference block grain size, as measured by the relative acoustic penetrability of the reference blocks, should be
reasonably similar to the forging under examination. However, it must be recognized that large austenitic forgings vary
Available from American Society for Nondestructive Testing (ASNT), P.O. Box 28518, 1711 Arlingate Ln., Columbus, OH 43228-0518, http://www.asnt.org.
A745/A745M − 20
considerably in acoustic penetrability throughout their volume due to variations in grain size and structure. Reference blocks
should be chosen that reasonably approximate the average penetrability of the forging under examination. Supplementary blocks
of coarser or finer grain may be used for evaluation of indications as covered in Section 11.
4.6.3 As an alternative method, where practicable, the appropriate size of reference hole (or holes) or notches may be placed
in representative areas of the forging for calibration and examination purposes when removed by subsequent machining. When
holes or notches are not removed by subsequent machining, the purchaser must approve the location of holes or notches.
5. Personnel Requirements
5.1 Personnel performing the ultrasonic examinations to this practice shall be qualified and certified in accordance with a written
procedure conforming to Recommended Practice No. SNT-TC-1A or another national standard that is acceptable to both the
purchaser and the supplier.
6. Forging Conditions
6.1 Forgings shall be ultrasonically examined after heat treating.
6.2 The surfaces of the forging to be examined shall be free of extraneous material such as loose scale, paint, dirt, etc.
6.3 The surface roughness of scanning surfaces shall not exceed 250 μin. [6 μm] unless otherwise stated in the order or contract
where the definition for surface finish is as per Specification A788/A788M.
6.4 The forgings shall be machined to a simple configuration, that is, rectangular or parallel or concentric surfaces where
complete volumetric coverage can be obtained.
6.5 In certain cases, such as with contour forged parts, it may be impractical to assure 100 % volumetric coverage. Such forgings
shall be examined to the maximum extent possible. A procedure indicating the extent of examination coverage shall be submitted
for the purchaser’spurchaser’s approval (see 3.2).
7. Procedure
7.1 Perform the ultrasonic examination after heat treatment when the forging is machined to the ultrasonic configuration but
prior to drilling holes, cutting keyways, tapers, grooves, or machining sections to final contour.
7.2 To ensure complete coverage of the forging volume when scanning, index the search unit with at least 15 % overlap with
each pass.
7.3 The scanning rate shall not exceed 6 in. [150 mm]/s.
7.4 Scan all regions of the forging in at least two perpendicular directions to the maximum extent possible.
7.5 Scan disk and disk-type forgings using a straight beam from at least one flat face and radially from the circumference when
practicable. For the purposes of this practice, a disk is a cylindrical shape where the diameter dimension exceeds the height
dimension. Disk-type forgings made as upset-forged “pancakes” shall be classified as disks for inspection purposes although at the
time of inspection, the part may have a center hole, counterturned steps, or other detail configuration.
7.6 Scan cylindrical sections, ring and hollow forgings from the entire external surface (sides or circumference), using the
straight-beam technique, and scan the forging in the axial direction to the extent possible. When the length divided by the diameter
ratio (slenderness ratio) exceeds 6 to 1 (or axial length exceeds 24 in. [600 mm]), scan axially from both end surfaces to the extent
possible. If axial penetration is not possible due to attenuation, angle-beam examination directed axially may be substituted in place
of axial straight beam. Examine ring and hollow forgings having an outside-diameter to inside-diameter ratio of less than 2 to 1
and a wall thickness less than 8 in. [200 mm] [200 mm] by angle-beam techniques from the outside diameter or inside diameter,
or both, using full node or half-node technique (see 10.1.2 and 10.1.3) as necessary to achieve either 100 % volumetric coverage
or the extent of coverage defined by an approved procedure (see 3.2).
7.7 If electronic circuitry is used for ultrasonic examination, the manufacturer’s instructions for the specific instrument shall
be required. This is achieved by the use of electronic circuitry referred to as time variable amplifier gain, typically called distance
amplitude correction (DAC), distance echo correction (DEC), time varying gain (TVG), time-corrected gain (TCG), or sensitivity
time control (STC). If circuitry is used that normalizes the amplitude of each reflector, such as TCG, the reflector with the lowest
response shall be set at 80 % FSH.
8. Examination Frequency
8.1 Perform all ultrasonic examination at the highest frequency practicable (as specified in 8.1.1, 8.1.2, or 8.1.3) that will
adequately penetrate the forging thickness and resolve the applicable reference standard. Include in the ultrasonic examination
report the examination frequency used. Determine the test frequency at the time of actual examination by the following guidelines:
8.1.1 The nominal test frequency shall be 2.25 MHz. Use of this frequency will generally be restricted due to attenuation.
8.1.2 One megahertz is acceptable
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...