ASTM D5283-18
(Practice)Standard Practice for Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste Management Activities: Quality Assurance and Quality Control Planning and Implementation
Standard Practice for Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste Management Activities: Quality Assurance and Quality Control Planning and Implementation
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Environmental data are often required for making regulatory and programmatic decisions. These data must be of known quality commensurate with their intended use.
5.2 Data generation efforts involve the following: establishment of the DQOs; design of the project plan to meet the DQOs; implementation of the project plan; and assessment of the data to determine whether the DQOs have been met.
5.3 Certain minimal criteria must be met by the field and laboratory organizations generating environmental data. Additional activities may be required, based on the DQOs of the data collection effort.
5.4 This practice defines the criteria for field and laboratory organizations generating environmental data and identifies some other activities that may be required based on the DQOs.
5.5 This practice emphasizes the importance of communication among those involved in establishing DQOs, planning and implementing the sampling and analysis aspects of environmental data generation activities, and assessing data quality.
5.6 Environmental field operations are discussed in Section 7, and environmental laboratory operations are discussed in Section 8.
SCOPE
1.1 Environmental data generation efforts are composed of four parts: (1) establishment of data quality objectives (DQOs); (2) design of field measurement and sampling strategies and specification of laboratory analyses and data acceptance criteria; (3) implementation of sampling and analysis strategies; and (4) data quality assessment. This practice addresses the planning and implementation of the sampling and analysis aspects of environmental data generation activities (Parts (1) and (2) above).
1.2 This practice defines the criteria that must be considered to ensure the quality of the field and analytical aspects of environmental data generation activities. Environmental data include, but are not limited to, the results from analyses of samples of air, soil, water, biota, waste, or any combinations thereof.
1.3 Adoption of a quality assurance project plan (QAPP) containing the goals, policies, procedures, organizational responsibilities, evaluation and reporting requirements, and other attributes of a quality management system including statement of DQOs should be adopted prior to application of this practice. Data generated in accordance with this practice are subject to a final assessment to determine whether the DQOs were met through application of quality control (QC) procedures that produce data that are scientifically valid for the purposes to which the data are intended. For example, many screening activities do not require all of the mandatory quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) steps found in this practice to generate data adequate to meet the project DQOs. The extent to which all of the requirements must be met remains a matter of technical judgement as it relates to the established DQOs.
1.4 This practice presents extensive management requirements designed to ensure high-quality environmental data. The words “must,” “shall,” “may,” and “should” have been selected carefully to reflect the importance placed on many of the statements made in this practice.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 30-Apr-2018
- Technical Committee
- D34 - Waste Management
- Drafting Committee
- D34.01.01 - Planning for Sampling
Relations
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2020
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Sep-2017
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2016
- Effective Date
- 01-Feb-2016
- Effective Date
- 01-Feb-2013
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2010
- Effective Date
- 01-Jul-2009
- Effective Date
- 01-Sep-2008
- Effective Date
- 01-Sep-2006
- Effective Date
- 01-Sep-2006
- Effective Date
- 15-Feb-2006
- Effective Date
- 01-Sep-2004
Overview
ASTM D5283-18 is a widely-recognized ASTM standard that provides a comprehensive framework for the generation of environmental data related to waste management activities, focusing on the planning and implementation of quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC). This standard is essential for ensuring the reliability and validity of environmental data, which supports regulatory and programmatic decision-making. By defining criteria for both field and laboratory operations, ASTM D5283-18 assists organizations in designing and executing data collection and analysis processes that meet established data quality objectives (DQOs).
Key Topics
Data Quality Objectives (DQOs): The standard emphasizes the importance of establishing DQOs as the foundation for any environmental data collection effort. DQOs determine the level of data quality necessary to support the intended use.
Project Planning and Management: ASTM D5283-18 details the creation of project plans that address objectives, management structure, sampling and analytical requirements, and QA/QC protocols.
Field and Laboratory Quality Assurance: The standard outlines requirements for both field and laboratory organizations, including clear organizational responsibilities, training, and documentation.
Quality Control Practices: It specifies types and frequencies of QC samples (e.g., blanks, duplicates, spikes) and necessitates protocols for data validation, corrective actions, and deviation documentation.
Documentation Management: The practice prescribes the development and maintenance of planning documents such as Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs), work plans, sample handling records, and QA/QC reports.
Communication and Assessment: ASTM D5283-18 highlights the significance of ongoing communication between stakeholders and systematic internal/external reviews to ensure compliance with QA/QC requirements.
Applications
Organizations engaged in hazardous waste management, environmental site assessments, remediation projects, and regulatory compliance benefit from applying ASTM D5283-18. Practical use cases include:
Designing and implementing sampling and analysis plans for air, soil, water, biota, and waste-ensuring data are fit for intended regulatory or programmatic decisions.
Developing QAPPs to clearly define project roles, SOPs, and data acceptance criteria.
Field operations: Applying standardized approaches for equipment calibration, sample handling, decontamination, and safety procedures to reduce errors and maintain data integrity.
Laboratory operations: Following outlined QC procedures to minimize contamination and ensure analytical precision and accuracy.
Data validation: Employing the standard's methods for reviewing, reducing, and validating data before it is used for reporting or compliance purposes.
By adhering to ASTM D5283-18, organizations support regulatory acceptance of their data, reduce risks of costly rework, and build confidence in the environmental data provided to clients and authorities.
Related Standards
ASTM D5283-18 references and complements several important standards and guidelines, including:
- ASTM D1129: Terminology relating to water.
- ASTM D5681: Terminology for waste and waste management.
- EPA QA/R-2 and QA/R-5: Guidelines for preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans and Quality Management systems.
- SW-846 Test Methods: Standard methods for evaluating solid waste.
These references, along with best practices from the U.S. EPA and other regulatory agencies, offer a holistic approach to environmental data generation and waste management QA/QC.
Keywords: ASTM D5283-18, environmental data, waste management, quality assurance, quality control, data quality objectives, QAPP, environmental sampling, laboratory quality control, regulatory compliance, QA/QC planning.
Buy Documents
ASTM D5283-18 - Standard Practice for Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste Management Activities: Quality Assurance and Quality Control Planning and Implementation
REDLINE ASTM D5283-18 - Standard Practice for Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste Management Activities: Quality Assurance and Quality Control Planning and Implementation
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

BSI Group
BSI (British Standards Institution) is the business standards company that helps organizations make excellence a habit.

Bureau Veritas
Bureau Veritas is a world leader in laboratory testing, inspection and certification services.

DNV
DNV is an independent assurance and risk management provider.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM D5283-18 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Practice for Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste Management Activities: Quality Assurance and Quality Control Planning and Implementation". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Environmental data are often required for making regulatory and programmatic decisions. These data must be of known quality commensurate with their intended use. 5.2 Data generation efforts involve the following: establishment of the DQOs; design of the project plan to meet the DQOs; implementation of the project plan; and assessment of the data to determine whether the DQOs have been met. 5.3 Certain minimal criteria must be met by the field and laboratory organizations generating environmental data. Additional activities may be required, based on the DQOs of the data collection effort. 5.4 This practice defines the criteria for field and laboratory organizations generating environmental data and identifies some other activities that may be required based on the DQOs. 5.5 This practice emphasizes the importance of communication among those involved in establishing DQOs, planning and implementing the sampling and analysis aspects of environmental data generation activities, and assessing data quality. 5.6 Environmental field operations are discussed in Section 7, and environmental laboratory operations are discussed in Section 8. SCOPE 1.1 Environmental data generation efforts are composed of four parts: (1) establishment of data quality objectives (DQOs); (2) design of field measurement and sampling strategies and specification of laboratory analyses and data acceptance criteria; (3) implementation of sampling and analysis strategies; and (4) data quality assessment. This practice addresses the planning and implementation of the sampling and analysis aspects of environmental data generation activities (Parts (1) and (2) above). 1.2 This practice defines the criteria that must be considered to ensure the quality of the field and analytical aspects of environmental data generation activities. Environmental data include, but are not limited to, the results from analyses of samples of air, soil, water, biota, waste, or any combinations thereof. 1.3 Adoption of a quality assurance project plan (QAPP) containing the goals, policies, procedures, organizational responsibilities, evaluation and reporting requirements, and other attributes of a quality management system including statement of DQOs should be adopted prior to application of this practice. Data generated in accordance with this practice are subject to a final assessment to determine whether the DQOs were met through application of quality control (QC) procedures that produce data that are scientifically valid for the purposes to which the data are intended. For example, many screening activities do not require all of the mandatory quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) steps found in this practice to generate data adequate to meet the project DQOs. The extent to which all of the requirements must be met remains a matter of technical judgement as it relates to the established DQOs. 1.4 This practice presents extensive management requirements designed to ensure high-quality environmental data. The words “must,” “shall,” “may,” and “should” have been selected carefully to reflect the importance placed on many of the statements made in this practice. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Environmental data are often required for making regulatory and programmatic decisions. These data must be of known quality commensurate with their intended use. 5.2 Data generation efforts involve the following: establishment of the DQOs; design of the project plan to meet the DQOs; implementation of the project plan; and assessment of the data to determine whether the DQOs have been met. 5.3 Certain minimal criteria must be met by the field and laboratory organizations generating environmental data. Additional activities may be required, based on the DQOs of the data collection effort. 5.4 This practice defines the criteria for field and laboratory organizations generating environmental data and identifies some other activities that may be required based on the DQOs. 5.5 This practice emphasizes the importance of communication among those involved in establishing DQOs, planning and implementing the sampling and analysis aspects of environmental data generation activities, and assessing data quality. 5.6 Environmental field operations are discussed in Section 7, and environmental laboratory operations are discussed in Section 8. SCOPE 1.1 Environmental data generation efforts are composed of four parts: (1) establishment of data quality objectives (DQOs); (2) design of field measurement and sampling strategies and specification of laboratory analyses and data acceptance criteria; (3) implementation of sampling and analysis strategies; and (4) data quality assessment. This practice addresses the planning and implementation of the sampling and analysis aspects of environmental data generation activities (Parts (1) and (2) above). 1.2 This practice defines the criteria that must be considered to ensure the quality of the field and analytical aspects of environmental data generation activities. Environmental data include, but are not limited to, the results from analyses of samples of air, soil, water, biota, waste, or any combinations thereof. 1.3 Adoption of a quality assurance project plan (QAPP) containing the goals, policies, procedures, organizational responsibilities, evaluation and reporting requirements, and other attributes of a quality management system including statement of DQOs should be adopted prior to application of this practice. Data generated in accordance with this practice are subject to a final assessment to determine whether the DQOs were met through application of quality control (QC) procedures that produce data that are scientifically valid for the purposes to which the data are intended. For example, many screening activities do not require all of the mandatory quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) steps found in this practice to generate data adequate to meet the project DQOs. The extent to which all of the requirements must be met remains a matter of technical judgement as it relates to the established DQOs. 1.4 This practice presents extensive management requirements designed to ensure high-quality environmental data. The words “must,” “shall,” “may,” and “should” have been selected carefully to reflect the importance placed on many of the statements made in this practice. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ASTM D5283-18 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 03.120.10 - Quality management and quality assurance; 13.030.01 - Wastes in general. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM D5283-18 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM D5283-92(2009), ASTM D5681-23, ASTM D1129-13(2020)e2, ASTM D5681-18, ASTM D5681-17, ASTM D5681-16a, ASTM D5681-16, ASTM D5681-13, ASTM D1129-10, ASTM D5681-09, ASTM D5681-08, ASTM D1129-06ae1, ASTM D1129-06a, ASTM D1129-06, ASTM D5681-98a(2004)e1. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM D5283-18 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: D5283 − 18
Standard Practice for
Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste
Management Activities: Quality Assurance and Quality
Control Planning and Implementation
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D5283; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope words“must,”“shall,”“may,”and“should”havebeenselected
carefully to reflect the importance placed on many of the
1.1 Environmental data generation efforts are composed of
statements made in this practice.
fourparts:(1)establishmentofdataqualityobjectives(DQOs);
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the
(2) design of field measurement and sampling strategies and
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
specification of laboratory analyses and data acceptance crite-
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
ria;(3)implementationofsamplingandanalysisstrategies;and
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
(4) data quality assessment. This practice addresses the plan-
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
ning and implementation of the sampling and analysis aspects
1.6 This international standard was developed in accor-
of environmental data generation activities (Parts (1) and (2)
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
above).
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
1.2 This practice defines the criteria that must be considered
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
to ensure the quality of the field and analytical aspects of
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
environmental data generation activities. Environmental data
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
include, but are not limited to, the results from analyses of
samples of air, soil, water, biota, waste, or any combinations
2. Referenced Documents
thereof.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.3 Adoption of a quality assurance project plan (QAPP)
D1129 Terminology Relating to Water
containing the goals, policies, procedures, organizational
D5681 Terminology for Waste and Waste Management
responsibilities, evaluation and reporting requirements, and
E1187 Terminology Relating to Conformity Assessment
other attributes of a quality management system including
(Withdrawn 2006)
statement of DQOs should be adopted prior to application of
2.2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Documents:
this practice. Data generated in accordance with this practice
SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Vol 1,
are subject to a final assessment to determine whether the
Third Edition (NTIS No. PB88239223/LL), November
DQOs were met through application of quality control (QC)
procedures that produce data that are scientifically valid for the
EPA/QAMS Development of Data Quality Objectives, De-
purposes to which the data are intended. For example, many
scription of Stages I and II, July 16, 1986
screening activities do not require all of the mandatory quality
EPA QA/R-2 EPA Requirements for Quality Management
assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) steps found in this
Plans, March 2001
practice to generate data adequate to meet the project DQOs.
EPAQA/R-5 EPARequirements for QualityAssurance Proj-
The extent to which all of the requirements must be met
ect Plans, March 2001
remains a matter of technical judgement as it relates to the
established DQOs.
1.4 This practice presents extensive management require-
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
ments designed to ensure high-quality environmental data.The
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D34 on Waste the ASTM website.
Management and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D34.01.01 on The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
Planning for Sampling. www.astm.org.
Current edition approved May 1, 2018. Published May 2018. Originally Available from U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of
approved in 1992. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as D5286 – 92 (2009). Documents, 732 N. Capitol St., NW, Washington, DC 20401-0001, http://
DOI: 10.1520/D5283-18. www.access.gpo.gov.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D5283 − 18
2.3 Other documents related to the subject matter of this sample processing. The method blank must be carried through
practice are cited in Appendix X1. This list is not intended to the complete sample preparation and analytical procedure and
be comprehensive. is used to document contamination resulting from the analyti-
cal process.
3. Terminology
3.2.13 project—single or multiple data collection activities
that are related through the same planning sequence.
3.1 Definitions—Terms applicable to this practice are de-
fined in Terminologies D1129, D5681, and E1187.
3.2.14 project planning documents—all documents related
to the definition of the environmental data collection activities
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
associated with a project.
3.2.1 background sample—a sample taken from a location
on or proximate to the site of interest and used to document
3.2.15 quality assurance program plan (QAPP)—an orderly
baseline or historical information. assemblageofmanagementpolicies,objectives,principles,and
general procedures by which an organization involved in
3.2.2 collocatedsamples—independentsamplescollectedas
environmentaldatagenerationactivitiesoutlineshowitintends
close as possible to the same point in space and time and
to produce data of known quality.
intended to be identical.
3.2.16 quality assurance project plan (QAPjP)—an orderly
3.2.3 environmental data generation activity—tasks associ-
assemblage of detailed procedures designed to produce data of
ated with the production of environmental data, including
sufficient quality to meet the DQOs for a specific data
planning, sampling, and analysis.
collection activity.
3.2.4 equipment rinsate (equipment blank)—a sample of
3.2.17 reference material—a material containing known
analyte-free media that has been used to rinse the sampling
quantities of target analytes in either solution or a homoge-
equipment. This blank is collected after the completion of
neous matrix and used to document the bias of the analytical
decontamination and prior to sampling, and is useful for
process.
assessing sampling equipment decontamination effectiveness.
3.2.18 split samples—aliquots of sample taken from the
3.2.5 field blank—a sample of analyte-free media similar to
same container and analyzed independently. These are usually
the sample matrix that is transferred from one vessel to another
taken after mixing or compositing and are used to document
or exposed to the sampling environment at the sampling site.
intra- or interlaboratory precision.
This blank is preserved and processed in the same manner as
the associated samples and is used to document contamination 3.2.19 standard addition—the practice of adding a known
amountofananalytetoasampleimmediatelypriortoanalysis,
in the sampling and analysis process.
typically used to evaluate matrix effects.
3.2.6 field duplicates—collocated samples that are analyzed
3.2.20 standard operating procedures (SOPs)—the estab-
independently and are useful in documenting the precision of
the sampling and analytical process. lished written procedures of a given organization for perform-
ing sampling, analyses, data management, etc. Special project
3.2.7 laboratory control sample—a known matrix spiked
plans may require procedures different from established SOPs.
with compound(s) representative of the target analytes and
3.2.21 surrogate—an organic compound that is similar to
used to document laboratory performance.
the target analyte(s) in chemical composition and behavior in
3.2.8 material blank—a sample composed of construction
the analytical process, but is not normally found in samples.
materials such as those used in well installation, well
3.2.22 trip blank—a sample of analyte-free media taken
development, pump and flow testing, and slurry wall construc-
from the laboratory (or appropriate point of origin) to the
tion. Examples of these materials are bentonite, sand, drilling
sampling site and returned to the laboratory unopened. A trip
fluids, and source and purge water. This blank documents
blank is used to document the contamination attributable to
possiblecontaminationresultingfromuseoftheseconstruction
shipping and field handling procedures, and is also useful in
materials.
documenting contamination of volatile organics samples.
3.2.9 matrix duplicate—an intralaboratory split sample used
to document the precision of a procedure in a given sample
4. Summary of Practice
matrix.
4.1 Thispracticedescribesthecriteriaandactivitiesforfield
3.2.10 matrix spike—an aliquot of sample spiked with a
and laboratory organizations involved in generating environ-
known concentration of target analyte(s) and used to document
mental data in terms of human and physical resources, QAand
the bias of an analytical process in a given sample matrix. The
QCprocedures,anddocumentationrequirementsasperproject
spiking occurs prior to sample preparation and analysis.
or program DQOs.
3.2.11 matrix spike duplicates—intralaboratory split
5. Significance and Use
samples spiked with identical concentrations of target ana-
5.1 Environmental data are often required for making regu-
lyte(s) and used to document the precision and bias of a
procedureinagivensamplematrix.Thespikingoccurspriorto latory and programmatic decisions. These data must be of
known quality commensurate with their intended use.
sample preparation and analysis.
3.2.12 method blank—an analyte-free media, to which all 5.2 Data generation efforts involve the following: establish-
reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions used in ment of the DQOs; design of the project plan to meet the
D5283 − 18
DQOs; implementation of the project plan; and assessment of 6.3.5.1 Field Quality Control—The types and frequency of
the data to determine whether the DQOs have been met. field QC samples to be collected, including field blanks, trip
blanks, equipment rinsates, field duplicates, background
5.3 Certain minimal criteria must be met by the field and
samples, reference materials, material blanks, and split
laboratory organizations generating environmental data. Addi-
samples, shall be specified. Control parameters for field activi-
tional activities may be required, based on the DQOs of the
ties shall also be described (see 7.6.4).
data collection effort.
6.3.5.2 Laboratory Quality Control—The types and fre-
5.4 This practice defines the criteria for field and laboratory
quency of use of laboratory QC samples, such as laboratory
organizations generating environmental data and identifies
control samples, laboratory blanks, matrix spikes, matrix
some other activities that may be required based on the DQOs.
duplicates, and matrix spike duplicates, shall be specified.Any
5.5 This practice emphasizes the importance of communi-
specific performance criteria shall be specified. Data validation
cation among those involved in establishing DQOs, planning
criteria shall be defined.
and implementing the sampling and analysis aspects of envi-
6.4 Project Documentation—All documents required for
ronmentaldatagenerationactivities,andassessingdataquality.
planning, implementing, and evaluating the data collection
5.6 Environmental field operations are discussed in Section
effort shall be specified. These may include, although not
7, and environmental laboratory operations are discussed in
limited to, a statement of work, technical and cost proposals,
Section 8.
work plan, sampling and analysis plan, quality assurance
project plan (QAPjP), health and safety plan, community
6. Project Specification
relations plan, documents required by regulatory agencies,
6.1 Project activities should be defined prior to the start of requirements for raw field and analytical records, technical
any field or laboratory activities. At a minimum, project reports assessing the environmental data, and records retention
specifications should address the following topics:
policy. Planning documents shall specify the required level of
document control and identify the personnel having access.
6.2 Data Quality Objectives—DQOs for the data generation
Document formats that may be required to ensure that all data
activity should be defined prior to the initiation of field and
needs are satisfied shall be specified. In addition, a project
laboratory work. It is desirable that the field and laboratory
schedule that identifies critical milestones and completion
organizations be aware of the DQOs so that the personnel
dates should be available.
conducting the work are able to make informed decisions
during the course of the project.
7. Standard Practices for Environmental Field
6.3 Project Plan—The project should be designed to meet
Operations
the DQOs, and the project plan should define the following:
7.1 Purpose—The field organization must conduct its op-
6.3.1 Project Objectives—Project objectives provide back-
erations in such a manner as to provide reliable information
ground information, state reasons for the data collection effort,
that meets the DQOs. To achieve this goal, certain minimum
identify any regulatory programs governing data collection,
policies and procedures must be implemented in order to meet
define specific objectives for each sampling location, and
the DQOs.
describe the intended uses for the data.
6.3.2 Project Management—Aperson(s) shall be designated
7.2 Organization—Thefieldorganizationshallbestructured
as having responsibility and authority for the following: (1)
such that each member of the organization has a clear under-
developing project documents that satisfy the DQOs; (2)
standingoftheirdutiesandresponsibilitiesandtherelationship
selecting field and laboratory organizations to conduct the
of those responsibilities to the total effort. The organizational
work; (3) coordinating communication among the field and
structure, functional responsibilities, levels of authority, job
laboratoryorganizationsandgovernmentagencies,asrequired;
descriptions, and lines of communication for activities shall be
and (4) reviewing and assessing the final data.
established and documented. One person may cover more than
6.3.3 Sampling Requirements—Sampling locations,
one organizational function.
equipment, and procedures and sample preservation and han-
7.2.1 Management—The management of the field organiza-
dling requirements shall be specified.
tion is responsible for establishing organizational, operational,
6.3.4 Analytical Requirements—The analytical procedures,
health and safety, and QA policies. Management shall ensure
analyte list, required detection limits, and required precision
that the following requirements are met: (1) the appropriate
andbiasvaluesshallbespecified.Regulatoryrequirementsand
methodologies are followed, as documented in the standard
DQOs shall be considered when developing the specifications.
operating procedures (SOPs); (2) personnel clearly understand
NOTE 1—This does not imply that the specified analytical requirements
their duties and responsibilities; (3) each staff member has
can be met.
access to appropriate project documents; (4) any deviations
6.3.5 Quality Assurance and Quality Control from the project plan are communicated to project manage-
Requirements—The QA and QC requirements shall address ment; and (5) communication occurs between the field,
both field and laboratory activities. The means for controlling laboratory, and project management, as specified in the project
false positives and false negatives shall be specified. Standard plan. Management shall foster an attitude within the organiza-
practices for field and laboratory operations as described in tion that emphasizes the importance of quality and supports
Sections 7 and 8 of this practice shall be required. implementationofthequalityassuranceprogramplan(QAPP).
D5283 − 18
7.2.2 Quality Assurance Function—The organization shall occurs, prior to transfer to the sampling site, or in designated
appoint a person or persons to be responsible for monitoring areas near the sampling site. Project documentation shall
field operations in order to ensure that the site facilities, specify where this work will be performed and how it will be
equipment, personnel, procedures, practices, and documenta- accomplished.Ifdecontaminationistobeconductedatthesite,
tion are in conformance with the organization’s QAPPand any water and solvents of appropriate purity shall be available.The
applicable QAPjP. The QA monitoring function should be method of accomplishing decontamination and the materials,
entirely separate from, and independent of, personnel engaged solvents, and water purity shall be specified in planning
in the work being monitored. The QA function shall be documents or standard operating procedures (SOPs).
responsible for the QA review, as per 7.7.
7.3.6 Waste Storage Area—Waste materials may be gener-
7.2.3 Personnel—It is the responsibility of the organization
ated during both the sampling process and on-site or in situ
to establish personnel qualifications and training requirements
analysis. Planning documents and SOPs shall outline the
for all positions. Each member of the organization shall
method for storage and disposal of these waste materials.
possess the education, training, technical knowledge, and
Adequate facilities shall be provided for the collection and
experience, or a combination thereof, to enable that individual
storage of all wastes. These facilities shall be operated so as to
to perform their assigned functions. Personnel qualifications
minimize environmental contamination. Waste storage and
shall be documented in terms of education, experience, and
disposal facilities shall comply with applicable federal, state,
training. Training shall be provided for all staff members, as
and local regulations.
necessary, so that they can perform their functions properly.
7.3.7 Data StorageArea—Planningdocumentsshallspecify
7.2.4 Subcontractors—The use of subcontractors shall not
the location of long- and short-term storage for field records.
jeopardize data quality.Therefore, subcontractors shall comply
The storage environment shall be maintained to ensure the
with the requirements of Sections 7 and 8, as appropriate to the
integrity of the data. Access shall be limited to authorized
specific task(s) they are performing.
personnel only.
7.3 Field Logistics:
7.4 Equipment and Instrumentation:
7.3.1 General—Sampling site facilities shall be examined
7.4.1 Equipment and Instrumentation—The equipment,
prior to the start of work in order to ensure that all required
instrumentation, and supplies required at the sampling site
itemsareavailable.Theactualsamplingareashallbeexamined
shall be appropriate to accomplish the activities planned. The
to ensure that trucks, drilling equipment, and personnel have
equipment and instrumentation shall meet the requirements of
access to the site. Security, health and safety, and protection of
pertinent specifications, methods, and SOPs. Before the field
theenvironmentshallbecontrolledatthesitesupportareasand
staffarrivesatthesite,alistofrequireditemsshallbeprepared
sampling site.
and checked to ensure availability at the site.
7.3.2 Field Measurements—Project planning documents
7.4.2 Maintenance and Calibration of Equipment and
shall both address the type of field measurements to be
Instrumentation—An SOP or operation and maintenance
performed and plan for the appropriate area to perform the
manual shall set forth the methods, materials, and schedules to
work. Planning documents shall address ventilation, protection
be used in the routine inspection, cleaning, maintenance,
from extreme weather and temperatures, access to stable
testing, and calibration of equipment and instrumentation used
power, and provisions for water and gases of required purity.
in performing geophysical, analytical, or in situ measurements.
Plans shall be made to identify and provide for the supply of
For common malfunctions, procedures or manuals may outline
applicable safety equipment, as specified in the project health
typical problems, methods of trouble-shooting, and possible
and safety plan.
corrective actions to be taken. Procedures shall designate a
7.3.3 Sample Handling, Shipping, and Storage Area—The
person(s) or organization responsible for maintenance and
determination of whether sample shipping is necessary shall be
calibration. Records of all inspections, maintenance, repairs,
made during project planning. This need is established by
testing, and calibration shall be maintained.
evaluatingtheanalysesrequired,holdingtimes,andlocationof
7.5 StandardOperatingProcedures—Theorganizationshall
the site and laboratory. Shipping or transporting of the samples
have written SOPs for all procedures performed routinely that
to a laboratory shall be completed in a timely manner, ensuring
affect data quality. SOPs shall be available for the following
that the laboratory is allowed sufficient time to perform its
areas and shall contain the information described:
analysis within any required holding times.
7.3.3.1 Samples shall be packaged, labeled, and docu- 7.5.1 Sample Management—These SOPs describe the num-
mented in an area that minimizes sample contamination and bering and labeling system, chain-of-custody procedures, and
provides for safe storage. The level of custody and whether tracking of samples from collection to shipment or relinquish-
sample storage is required shall be outlined in the planning ment to the laboratory. Sample management also includes the
documents. specification of holding times, volume of sample required by
the laboratory, preservatives, and shipping requirements.
7.3.4 Chemical Storage—Safe storage areas for solvents,
reagents, standards, and reference materials shall be adequate
7.5.2 Reagent and Standard Preparation—These SOPs de-
to preserve their identity, concentration, purity, and stability
scribe the procedures used to prepare standards and reagents.
prior to use.
Information should be included concerning the specific grades
7.3.5 Decontamination—Decontamination of sampling of materials used in reagent and standard preparation, appro-
equipmentmaybeperformedatthelocationatwhichsampling priate glassware and containers for preparation and storage,
D5283 − 18
labelingandrecordkeepingforstocksanddilutions,andsafety 7.5.9 Reporting—These SOPs describe the process for re-
precautions to be taken. porting field activity results.
7.5.10 Records Management—These SOPs describe the
7.5.3 Decontamination—These SOPs describe the proce-
procedures for generating, controlling, and archiving field
dures used to clean field equipment before, after, and during
records. These SOPs should describe the responsibilities for
the sample collection process. These SOPs should include the
record generation and control and the policies for record
cleaning materials used, the order of washing and rinsing with
retention, including type, time, security, and retrieval and
the cleaning materials, requirements for protecting or covering
disposal authorities. Records should include project-specific
cleaned equipment, procedures for disposing of cleaning
and field operations records.
materials, and safety considerations.
7.5.10.1 Project-specific records relate to field work per-
7.5.4 Sample Collection Procedures—SOPs for sample col-
formed for a group of samples. Project records may include
lection procedures shall describe how the procedures are
correspondence, chain of custody, field notes, all reports issued
actually performed in the field and shall not be a simple
as a result of the work, project planning documents, and
reference to standard test methods, unless a procedure is
procedural SOPs used.
performed exactly as described in the published test method. If
7.5.10.2 Field operations records document overall field
possible, industry-recognized test methods from source docu-
operations.These records may include equipment performance
mentspublishedbytheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,
and maintenance logs, personnel files, general field SOPs, and
ASTM, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Water Well
corrective action reports.
Association, American Petroleum Institute, or other reputable
7.5.11 Waste Disposal—These SOPs describe policies and
organizations should be used. The SOP for sample collection
procedures for the disposal of waste materials resulting from
procedures should include the following information:
field operations. The disposal of all wastes must conform to
7.5.4.1 Applicability of the procedure,
federal, state, and local regulations, including those associated
7.5.4.2 Equipment and reagents required,
with the Resource Conservation and RecoveryAct, Superfund
7.5.4.3 Detailed description of the procedures to be fol-
Act Reauthorization and Amendments, Department of
lowed in collecting the samples,
Transportation, and Occupational Safety and Health Adminis-
7.5.4.4 Sample labeling, preservation, and storage,
tration.
7.5.4.5 Common problems encountered,
7.5.12 Health and Safety—These SOPs describe policies
7.5.4.6 Precautions to be taken, and
and procedures designed both to provide a safe and healthy
7.5.4.7 Health and safety considerations. working environment for field personnel and to comply with
federal and state regulations.
7.5.5 Equipment Calibration and Maintenance—These
SOPs describe the procedures used to ensure that field equip-
7.6 Field Quality Assurance and Quality Control Require-
ment and instrumentation are in working order. The SOPs
ments:
describe calibration and maintenance procedures and
7.6.1 Quality Assurance Program Plan—The field organi-
schedules, maintenance logs, service contracts or service
zation shall have a written QAPP that describes the organiza-
arrangements for equipment, and spare parts available in
tion’s QA policy. The plan shall specify the responsibilities of
house.The calibration and maintenance of field equipment and
the field management and field staff and the QAfunction in the
instrumentation should generally be in accordance with manu-
areas of QA and QC, and it shall also describe the QC
facturers’ specifications and shall be documented.
procedures followed by the organization (see EPA QA/R-2).
7.5.6 Field Measurements—These SOPs describe all meth-
7.6.2 Quality Assurance Project Plan—Some projects, par-
ods used in the field to determine a chemical or physical
ticularly those that are large or complex, require a QAPjP. The
parameter.These SOPs shall address criteria from Section8,as
QAPjPdetails the QAand QC goals and protocol for a specific
appropriate.
data collection activity to ensure that the data generated by
7.5.7 Corrective Action—These SOPs describe procedures
sampling and analysis activities are of quality commensurate
used to identify and correct deficiencies in the sample collec-
with their intended use. QAPjP elements should include a
tion process. These should include specific steps to take in
discussionofthequalityobjectivesoftheproject,identification
correcting deficiencies, such as performing additional decon-
of those involved in the data collection and their responsibili-
tamination of equipment, resampling, or additional training of
ties and authorities, enumeration of the QC procedures to be
field personnel in methods procedures. The SOP shall specify
followed, and reference to the specific SOPs that will be
that each corrective action must be documented with a descrip-
followed for all aspects of the project. Elements may be added
tion of the deficiency, the corrective action taken, reoccurrence
or removed, as required by the project or the end user of the
minimization as appropriate, and the person(s) responsible for
data (see EPA QA/R-5).
implementing the corrective action.
7.6.3 Control Samples—Control samples are QC samples
7.5.8 Data Reduction and Validation—These SOPs describe that are introduced into a process to monitor the performance
procedures used to compute the results from field measure- of the collection or analytic system, or both. Control samples,
ments and to review and validate these data. They should which may include blanks, duplicates, spikes, analytical
include all formulas used to calculate the results and proce- standards, and reference materials, can be used in different
dures used to verify independently that the field measurement phases of the overall process, beginning with sampling and
results are correct. continuing through transportation, storage, and analysis. The
D5283 − 18
types of control samples used, and the frequency of usage, are On-site evaluations may include, but are not limited to, a
dependent on the DQOs of the data collection effort and must complete review of the facilities, staff, training,
be specified for each project. instrumentation, SOPs, methods, field analysis, sample
7.6.4 Procedures for Establishing Acceptance Criteria— collection, QA and QC policies, and procedures related to the
generation of environmental data. Records of each evaluation
Proceduresshallbeinplaceforestablishingacceptancecriteria
for field activities, as required in the project planning docu- shall be maintained until superseded or according to policy.
Theserecordsshouldincludethedateoftheevaluation,areaor
ments. Acceptance criteria may be qualitative or quantitative.
Field events or data that fall outside of the established site,areasreviewed,personperformingtheevaluation,findings
and problems, actions recommended and taken to resolve the
acceptance criteria may indicate a problem with the sampling
process that must be investigated. problems, and scheduled date for re-inspection. Any problems
identified that are likely to affect data integrity shall be brought
7.6.5 Deviations—Any activity not performed in accor-
dance with the SOPs or project planning documents is consid- to the attention of management immediately.
ered a deviation from the plan. Deviations from the plan may 7.7.2 Evaluation of Field Records—The review of field
ormaynotaffectdataquality.Alldeviationsfromtheplanshall
records shall be conducted by one or more persons knowledge-
be documented as to the extent of, and reason for, the able in the field activities, evaluating the following subjects at
deviation.
a minimum:
7.6.6 Corrective Action—Errors, deficiencies, deviations, or
7.7.2.1 Completeness of Field Reports—This review en-
field events or data that fall outside the established acceptance
sures that all requirements for field activities in the planning
criteria require investigation. Corrective action may be neces-
documents have been fulfilled, that complete records exist for
sary to resolve the problem and restore proper functioning to
each field activity, and that the procedures specified in the
the system in some instances. Investigation of the problem and
planning documents have been implemented. The emphasis on
any subsequent corrective action taken shall be documented.
field documentation will help ensure sample integrity and
7.6.7 Data Handling Procedures:
sufficient technical information to recreate each field event.
7.6.7.1 Data Reduction—All field measurement data are
The results of this completeness check shall be documented,
reduced according to protocol described in the appropriate
and environmental data affected by incomplete records shall be
SOP. Computer programs used for data reduction shall be
identified.
validated before use and verified on a regular basis. All
7.7.2.2 Identification of Invalid Samples—This review in-
informationusedinthecalculationsshallberecordedtoenable
volves interpretation and evaluation of the field records to
reconstruction of the final result at a later date.
detect problems affecting the representativeness of environ-
7.6.7.2 Data Review—All data are reviewed according to
mental samples. Examples of items that could indicate invalid
SOPs to ensure that the calculations are correct and to detect
samples include improper well development, improperly
transcription errors. Spot checks are performed on computer
screenedwells,instabilityofpHorconductivity,andcollection
calculations to verify program validity.
of volatiles near combustion engines.The field records shall be
7.6.7.3 Data Reporting—Data are reported in accordance
evaluated against planning documents and SOPs.The reviewer
with the requirements of the end user.
shall document the sample validity and identify the environ-
mental data associated with poor or incorrect field work.
7.7 Quality Assurance Review:
7.7.2.3 Correlation of Field Test Data—The results of field
7.7.1 General—The QA review consists of internal and
measurements obtained by more than one method shall be
external assessments to ensure that both QA and QC proce-
compared. For example, surface geophysics may be surveyed
dures are in use and field staff conform to these procedures.
using both ground penetrating radar and a resistivity survey.
Planningdocumentsshallspecifytherequirementsforinternal,
7.7.2.4 Identification of Anomalous Field Test Data—
external, and on-site assessment. These documents shall
Anomalous field test data should be identified. For example, a
specify the frequency and documentation of these assessments.
water temperature for one well that is five degrees higher than
7.7.1.1 Internal Assessment—Personnel responsible for per-
anyotherwelltemperatureinthesameaquifershouldbenoted.
forming field activities are responsible for continually moni-
The impact of anomalous field measurement results on the
toring individual compliance with the QA and QC programs
associated environmental data shall be evaluated.
and planning documents. A QA officer or an appropriate
management designee shall review the field results and find- 7.7.2.5 Validation of Field Analysis—All data from field
ings for compliance with the QA and QC programs and analysis that are generated in situ or from a mobile laboratory
shall be validated per 8.7.2. The results of the validation shall
planning documents. The results of this internal assessment
shouldbereportedtomanagementwithrequirementsforaplan be reported. The report shall discuss whether the QC checks
meet the acceptance criteria and whether corrective actions
to correct any observed deficiencies.
were taken for any analysis performed when acceptance
7.7.1.2 External Assessment—The field staff may be re-
criteria were not met.
viewedbypersonnelexternaltotheorganization.Theresultsof
the external assessment should be submitted to management 7.7.3 Quality Assurance Reports to Management—The QA
with requirements for a plan to correct the observed deficien-
program shall provide for the periodic reporting of pertinent
cies. QAandQCinformationtomanagementtoallowassessmentof
7.7.1.3 On-Site Evaluation—On-site evaluations may be the overall effectiveness of the QA program. There are three
conducted as part of both internal and external assessments. major types of QA reports to management:
D5283 − 18
7.7.3.1 Report on Measurement Quality Indicators—This 7.8.4 Equipment Maintenance—Maintenance procedures
report shall include the assessment of QC data (such as that shall be defined clearly and written for each measurement
generated per 7.6.3) gathered over the period, the frequency of
system and required support equipment. When maintenance is
repeating work due to unacceptable performance, and correc- necessary, it shall be documented in either standard forms or in
tive action taken.
logbooks. A history of the maintenance record of each system
7.7.3.2 Report on Quality Assurance Assessments—This serves as an indication of the adequacy of maintenance
reportshallbesubmittedimmediatelyfollowinganyinternalor schedules and parts inventory.
externalon-siteevaluationsoruponreceiptoftheresultsofany
7.8.5 Calibration and Traceability of Standards and
performance evaluation studies. The report shall include the
Reagents—Calibration is a reproducible reference base to
results of the assessment and the plan for correcting identified
which all sample measurements can be correlated. A sound
deficiencies.
calibrationprogramshallincludeprovisionsfordocumentation
7.7.3.3 Report on Key Quality Assurance Activities During
of the frequency, conditions, standards, and records reflecting
the Period—A report shall be delivered to management sum-
the calibration history of a measurement system. The accuracy
marizing key QA activities during the period. The report shall
of calibration standards is an important point to consider
stress measures that are being taken to improve data quality
because all data will be in reference to the standards used. A
andshallincludeasummaryofthesignificantqualityproblems
program for verifying and documenting the accuracy of all
observed and corrective actions taken. The report shall also
working standards against primary grade standards shall be
include a summary of involvements in resolution of quality
followed routinely.
issueswithclientsoragencies,QAorganizationalchanges,and
7.8.6 Sample Collection and Tracking Records—To ensure
notice of the distribution of any revised documents controlled
maximum utility of the sampling effort and resulting data,
by the QA function.
documentation of the sampling protocol, as performed in the
7.8 Field Records—Records provide direct evidence and
field, is essential. At a minimum, sample collection records
support for the necessary technical interpretations, judgments,
shall contain the persons conducting the activity, sample
and discussions concerning project activities. These records,
number, sample location, equipment used, climatic conditions,
particularly those that are anticipated for use as evidentiary
documentation of adherence to protocol, and unusual observa-
data, must directly support current or ongoing technical studies
tions. The actual sample collection record is usually one of the
and activities and must provide the historical evidence neces-
following: a bound field notebook with pre-numbered pages, a
sary for later reviews and analyses. Records shall be legible,
pre-printed form, or information stored on a computer hard
identifiable, and retrievable and protected from damage,
drive or network.
deterioration, or loss. Field records generally consist of bound
7.8.6.1 Sample tracking records involving the possession of
field notebooks with pre-numbered pages, sample collection
samples from the time at which they are obtained until they are
forms, personnel qualification and training forms, sample
relinquished shall be documented with the following minimum
location maps, equipment maintenance and calibration forms,
information: (1) project name; (2) signatures of the samplers;
chain-of-custody forms, sample analysis request forms, and
(3) sample number, date and time of collection, and grab or
field change request forms.All records shall be completed with
compositesampledesignation;(4)signaturesoftheindividuals
black, waterproof ink. Procedures for reviewing, approving,
involved in sample transfer; and (5) the air bill or other
and revising field records must be defined clearly, with the
shipping number, if applicable.
lines of authority included. At a minimum, all documentation
7.8.7 Maps and Drawings—Project planning documents
errors shall be corrected by drawing a single line through the
andreportsoftencontainmaps.Themapsareusedtodocument
error and initialing by the responsible individual, along with
the location of sample collection points and monitoring wells,
the date of change. The correction is written adjacent to the
and as a means of presenting environmental data. Information
error. Deviations from field SOPs shall be documented.
used to prepare maps and drawings is normally obtained
7.8.1 Personnel Training and Qualification Records—It is
through field surveys, property surveys, surveys of monitoring
the responsibility of the organization to establish personnel
wells, aerial photography, or photogrammetric mapping. The
qualifications and training requirements. Each staff member
final,approvedmapsshallhavearevisionnumberanddateand
shall possess the education, training, technical knowledge, and
shall be subject to the same controls as other project records.
experience, or a combination thereof, to enable that individual
7.8.8 Results from Control Samples—Documentationforthe
to perform their assigned functions. Personnel qualifications
collection of QC samples, such as field, trip, and equipment
shall be documented in terms of education, experience, and
rinsate blanks, duplicate samples, spikes, and reference
training. Training shall be provided for all staff members so
materials, shall be maintained.
that they can perform their functions properly.
7.8.9 Correspondence—Project correspondence can provide
7.8.2 Standard Operating Procedures—SOPs shall be avail-
evidence supporting technical interpretations. Correspondence
able to those performing the task outlined. Any revisions to
pertinent to the project shall be kept and placed in the project
field SOPs shall be written and distributed to all affected
files.
individuals to ensure the implementation of changes.The areas
covered by SOPs are given in 7.5.
7.8.10 Deviations—Field changes and deviations from the
planning documents shall be reviewed and approved by either
7.8.3 Quality Assurance Plans—The QAPP and all appli-
cable QAPjPs shall be on file. the authorized personnel who performed the original technical
D5283 − 18
review, or their designees. All deviations from the procedural mentation are in conformance with the laboratory QAPP and
and planning documents shall be recorded in the site log. any applicable QAPjP(s).The QAmonitoring function shall be
7.8.11 Final Report—The final report shall summarize field entirely separate from, and independent of, personnel engaged
activities, data, results of deviations from the planning in direct supervision or performance of the work being
documents, and interpretation of the data. The planning docu- monitored. The QA staff shall: inspect records to ensure that
mentsshalloutlinetheitemstobeincludedinthereport,which analyses have been performed correctly and within the proper
may include any special formats required, QC reporting time frame; maintain copies of the QAPPand QAPjPs pertain-
requirements, conclusions, and recommendations. ing to all analyses; perform assessments of the laboratory to
ensure adherence to the QAPP; periodically submit written
7.9 Documentation Storage:
status reports to management, noting any problems and the
7.9.1 Documentation Archive—Procedures shall be estab-
corrective actions taken; summarize assessments; ensure that
lished to ensure that documents required to recreate the
anydeviationsfromtheapprovedQAPP,QAPjP,orSOPshave
sampling, analysis, and reporting of information are stored.
been authorized and documented properly; and ensure that the
These documents may include, but are not limited to, planning
results reported reflect the raw data accurately. The responsi-
documents, SOPs, logbooks, field data records, sample tags
bilities of the QA function and procedures used in conducting
and labels, chain-of-custody records, photographs, and any
those responsibilities shall be in writing and shall be main-
other information noted in 7.8.
tained.
7.9.2 Storage Time—The length of storage time for field
8.2.3 Personnel—It is the responsibility of the organization
records shall comply with regulatory requirements, organiza-
to establish personnel qualifications and training requirements
tional policy, or project requirements, whichever is/are more
for all positions. Each member of the organization shall
stringent.
possess the education, training, technical knowledge, and
7.9.3 Filing System—The control of records is essential in
experience, or a com
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: D5283 − 92 (Reapproved 2009) D5283 − 18
Standard Practice for
Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste
Management Activities: Quality Assurance and Quality
Control Planning and Implementation
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D5283; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 Environmental data generation efforts are composed of four parts: (1) establishment of data quality objectives (DQOs); (2)
design of field measurement and sampling strategies and specification of laboratory analyses and data acceptance criteria; (3)
implementation of sampling and analysis strategies; and (4) data quality assessment. This practice addresses the planning and
implementation of the sampling and analysis aspects of environmental data generation activities (Parts (1) and (2) above).
1.2 This practice defines the criteria that must be considered to assureensure the quality of the field and analytical aspects of
environmental data generation activities. Environmental data include, but are not limited to, the results from analyses of samples
of air, soil, water, biota, waste, or any combinations thereof.
1.3 Adoption of a quality assurance project plan (QAPP) containing the goals, policies, procedures, organizational
responsibilities, evaluation and reporting requirements, and other attributes of a quality management system including statement
of DQOs should be adopted prior to application of this practice. Data generated in accordance with this practice are subject to a
final assessment to determine whether the DQOs were met. met through application of quality control (QC) procedures that
produce data that are scientifically valid for the purposes to which the data are intended. For example, many screening activities
do not require all of the mandatory quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) steps found in this practice to generate data
adequate to meet the project DQOs. The extent to which all of the requirements must be met remains a matter of technical
judgement as it relates to the established DQOs.
1.4 This practice presents extensive management requirements designed to ensure high-quality environmental data. The words
“must,” “shall,” “may,” and “should” have been selected carefully to reflect the importance placed on many of the statements made
in this practice.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
NOTE 1—A complete table of contents of this practice is given in Appendix X1.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D1129 Terminology Relating to Water
D5681 Terminology for Waste and Waste Management
E1187 Terminology Relating to Conformity Assessment (Withdrawn 2006)
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D34 on Waste Management and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D34.01.01 on Planning for
Sampling.
Current edition approved Feb. 1, 2009May 1, 2018. Published March 2009May 2018. Originally approved in 1992. Last previous edition approved in 20032009 as D5286
– 92 (2003).(2009). DOI: 10.1520/D5283-92R09.10.1520/D5283-18.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on www.astm.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D5283 − 18
2.2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Documents:
SW-846, SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Vol 1, Third Edition (NTIS No. PB88239223/LL), November 1986
QAMS-005/80 (NTIS No. PB83170514/LL), Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project
Plans, Office of Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance, December 29, 1980
EPA/QAMS, EPA/QAMSDevelopment of Data Quality Objectives, Description of Stages I and II, July 16, Development of Data
Quality Objectives, Description of Stages I and II, July 16, 1986
QAMS 004/80EPA QA/R-2 (NTIS No. PB83219667/LL), EPA Requirements Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing
Quality Assurance Program for Quality Management Plans, Office of Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance, September
20, 1980 March 2001
EPA QA/R-5 EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans, March 2001
2.3 Other documents related to the subject matter of this practice are cited in Appendix X2. This list is not intended to be
comprehensive.
2.3 Other documents related to the subject matter of this practice are cited in Appendix X1. This list is not intended to be
comprehensive.
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions—The terms most Terms applicable to this practice have been are defined in Terminologies D1129, D5681, and
E1187.
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 background sample—a sample taken from a location on or proximate to the site of interest and used to document baseline
or historical information.
3.2.2 collocated samples—independent samples collected as close as possible to the same point in space and time and intended
to be identical.
3.2.3 data quality objectives (DQOs)—statements on the level of uncertainty that a decision maker is willing to accept in the
results derived from environmental data (see EPA/QAMS, July 16, 1986).
3.2.3 environmental data generation activity—tasks associated with the production of environmental data, including planning,
sampling, and analysis.
3.2.4 equipment rinsate (equipment blank)—a sample of analyte-free media that has been used to rinse the sampling equipment.
This blank is collected after the completion of decontamination and prior to sampling, and is useful for documenting the adequate
decontamination of sampling equipment.assessing sampling equipment decontamination effectiveness.
3.2.5 field blank—a sample of analyte-free media similar to the sample matrix that is transferred from one vessel to another or
exposed to the sampling environment at the sampling site. This blank is preserved and processed in the same manner as the
associated samples and is used to document contamination in the sampling and analysis process.
3.2.6 field duplicates—collocated samples that are analyzed independently and are useful in documenting the precision of the
sampling and analytical process.
3.2.7 laboratory control sample—a known matrix spiked with compound(s) representative of the target analytes and used to
document laboratory performance.
3.2.8 material blank—a sample composed of construction materials such as those used in well installation, well development,
pump and flow testing, and slurry wall construction. Examples of these materials are bentonite, sand, drilling fluids, and source
and purge water. This blank documents thepossible contamination resulting from use of thethese construction materials.
3.2.9 matrix duplicate—an intralaboratory split sample used to document the precision of a procedure in a given sample matrix.
3.2.10 matrix spike—an aliquot of sample spiked with a known concentration of target analyte(s) and used to document the bias
of an analytical process in a given sample matrix. The spiking occurs prior to sample preparation and analysis.
3.2.11 matrix spike duplicates—intralaboratory split samples spiked with identical concentrations of target analyte(s) and used
to document the precision and bias of a procedure in a given sample matrix. The spiking occurs prior to sample preparation and
analysis.
3.2.12 method blank—an analyte-free media, to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions used in sample
processing. The method blank must be carried through the complete sample preparation and analytical procedure and is used to
document contamination resulting from the analytical process.
3.2.13 project—single or multiple data collection activities that are related through the same planning sequence.
Available from U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, 732 N. Capitol St., NW, Washington, DC
20402.20401-0001, http://www.access.gpo.gov.
D5283 − 18
3.2.14 project planning documents—all documents related to the definition of the environmental data collection activities
associated with a project.
3.2.15 quality assurance program plan (QAPP)—an orderly assemblage of management policies, objectives, principles, and
general procedures by which an organization involved in environmental data generation activities outlines how it intends to
produce data of known quality.
3.2.16 quality assurance project plan (QAPjP)—an orderly assemblage of detailed procedures designed to produce data of
sufficient quality to meet the DQOs for a specific data collection activity.
3.2.17 reference material—a material containing known quantities of target analytes in either solution or a homogeneous matrix
and used to document the bias of the analytical process.
3.2.18 split samples—aliquots of sample taken from the same container and analyzed independently. These are usually taken
after mixing or compositing and are used to document intra- or interlaboratory precision.
3.2.19 standard addition—the practice of adding a known amount of an analyte to a sample immediately prior to analysis,
typically used to evaluate matrix effects.
3.2.20 standard operating procedures (SOPs)—the established written procedures of a given organization. organization for
performing sampling, analyses, data management, etc. Special project plans may require procedures different from the established
SOPs.
3.2.21 surrogate—an organic compound that is similar to the target analyte(s) in chemical composition and behavior in the
analytical process, but is not normally found in environmental samples.
3.2.22 trip blank—a sample of analyte-free media taken from the laboratory (or appropriate point of origin) to the sampling site
and returned to the laboratory unopened. A trip blank is used to document the contamination attributable to shipping and field
handling procedures, and is also useful in documenting the contamination of volatile organics samples.
4. Summary of Practice
4.1 This practice describes the criteria and activities for field and laboratory organizations involved in generating environmental
data in terms of human and physical resources, QA and QC procedures, and documentation requirements depending on the as per
project or program DQOs.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 Environmental data are often required for making regulatory and programmatic decisions. These data must be of known
quality commensurate with their intended use.
5.2 Data generation efforts involve the following: establishment of the DQOs; design of the project plan to meet the DQOs;
implementation of the project plan; and assessment of the data to determine whether the DQOs have been met.
5.3 Certain minimal criteria must be met by the field and laboratory organizations generating environmental data. Additional
activities may be required, based on the DQOs of the data collection effort.
5.4 This practice defines the criteria for field and laboratory organizations generating environmental data and identifies some
other activities that may be required based on the DQOs.
5.5 This practice emphasizes the importance of communication among those involved in establishing DQOs, planning and
implementing the sampling and analysis aspects of environmental data generation activities, and assessing data quality.
5.6 Environmental field operations are discussed in Section 7, and environmental laboratory operations are discussed in Section
8.
6. Project Specification
6.1 Project activities should be defined prior to the start of any field or laboratory activities. At a minimum, project specifications
should address the following topics:
6.2 Data Quality Objectives—DQOs for the data generation activity should be defined prior to the initiation of field and
laboratory work. It is desirable that the field and laboratory organizations be aware of the DQOs so that the personnel conducting
the work are able to make informed decisions during the course of the project.
6.3 Project Plan—The project should be designed to meet the DQOs, and the project plan should define the following:
6.3.1 Project Objectives—Project objectives provide background information, state reasons for the data collection effort,
identify any regulatory programs governing data collection, define specific objectives for each sampling location, and describe the
intended uses for the data.
D5283 − 18
6.3.2 Project Management—A person(s) shall be designated as having responsibility and authority for the following: (1)
developing project documents that implementsatisfy the DQOs; (2) selecting field and laboratory organizations to conduct the
work; (3) coordinating communication among the field and laboratory organizations and government agencies, as required; and
(4) reviewing and assessing the final data.
6.3.3 Sampling Requirements—Sampling locations, equipment, and procedures and sample preservation and handling
requirements shall be specified.
6.3.4 Analytical Requirements—The analytical procedures, analyte list, required detection limits, and required precision and
bias values shall be specified. Regulatory requirements and DQOs shall be considered when developing the specifications.
NOTE 1—This does not imply that the specified analytical requirements can be met.
6.3.5 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Requirements—The QA and QC requirements shall address both field and
laboratory activities. The means for controlling false positives and false negatives shall be specified. Standard practices for field
and laboratory operations as described in Sections 7 and 8 of this practice shall be required.
6.3.5.1 Field Quality Control—The types and frequency of field QC samples to be collected, including field blanks, trip blanks,
equipment rinsates, field duplicates, background samples, reference materials, material blanks, and split samples, shall be specified.
Control parameters for field activities shall also be described (see 7.6.4).
6.3.5.2 Laboratory Quality Control—The types and frequency of use of laboratory QC samples, such as laboratory control
samples, laboratory blanks, matrix spikes, matrix duplicates, and matrix spike duplicates, shall be specified. Any specific
performance criteria shall be specified. Data validation criteria shall be defined.
6.4 Project Documentation—All documents required for planning, implementing, and evaluating the data collection effort shall
be specified. These may include, although not limited to, a statement of work, technical and cost proposals, work plan, sampling
and analysis plan, quality assurance project plan (QAPjP), health and safety plan, community relations plan, documents required
by regulatory agencies, requirements for raw field and analytical records, technical reports assessing the environmental data, and
records retention policy. Planning documents shall specify the required level of document control and identify the personnel having
access. Document formats that may be required to ensure that all data needs are satisfied shall be specified. In addition, a project
schedule that identifies critical milestones and completion dates should be available.
7. Standard Practices for Environmental Field Operations
7.1 Purpose—The field organization must conduct its operations in such a manner as to provide reliable information that meets
the DQOs. To achieve this goal, certain minimum policies and procedures must be implemented in order to meet the DQOs.
7.2 Organization—The field organization shall be structured such that each member of the organization has a clear
understanding of his or her their duties and responsibilities and the relationship of those responsibilities to the total effort. The
organizational structure, functional responsibilities, levels of authority, job descriptions, and lines of communication for activities
shall be established and documented. One person may cover more than one organizational function.
7.2.1 Management—The management of the field organization is responsible for establishing organizational, operational, health
and safety, and QA policies. Management shall ensure that the following requirements are met: (1) the appropriate methodologies
are followed, as documented in the standard operating procedures (SOPs); (2) personnel clearly understand their duties and
responsibilities; (3) each staff member has access to appropriate project documents; (4) any deviations from the project plan are
communicated to project management; and (5) communication occurs between the field, laboratory, and project management, as
specified in the project plan. Management shall foster an attitude within the organization that emphasizes the importance of quality
and supports implementation of the quality assurance program plan (QAPP).
7.2.2 Quality Assurance Function—The organization shall appoint a person or persons to be responsible for monitoring field
operations in order to ensure that the site facilities, equipment, personnel, procedures, practices, and documentation are in
conformance with the organization’s QAPP and any applicable QAPjP. The QA monitoring function should be entirely separate
from, and independent of, personnel engaged in the work being monitored. The QA function shall be responsible for the QA review,
as per 7.7.
7.2.3 Personnel—It is the responsibility of the organization to establish personnel qualifications and training requirements for
all positions. Each member of the organization shall possess the education, training, technical knowledge, and experience, or a
combination thereof, to enable that individual to perform his or her their assigned functions. Personnel qualifications shall be
documented in terms of education, experience, and training. Training shall be provided for all staff members, as necessary, so that
they can perform their functions properly.
7.2.4 Subcontractors—The use of subcontractors shall not jeopardize data quality. Therefore, subcontractors shall comply with
the requirements of Sections 7 and 8, as appropriate to the specific task(s) they are performing.
7.3 Field Logistics:
7.3.1 General—Sampling site facilities shall be examined prior to the start of work in order to ensure that all required items are
available. The actual sampling area shall be examined to ensure that trucks, drilling equipment, and personnel have access to the
site. Security, health and safety, and protection of the environment shall be controlled at the site support areas and sampling site.
D5283 − 18
7.3.2 Field Measurements—Project planning documents shall both address the type of field measurements to be performed and
plan for the appropriate area to perform the work. Planning documents shall address ventilation, protection from extreme weather
and temperatures, access to stable power, and provisions for water and gases of required purity. Plans shall be made to identify
and supply provide for the supply of applicable safety equipment, as specified in the project health and safety plan.
7.3.3 Sample Handling, Shipping, and Storage Area—The determination of whether sample shipping is necessary shall be made
during project planning. This need is established by evaluating the analyses required, holding times, and location of the site and
laboratory. Shipping or transporting of the samples to a laboratory shall be completed in a timely manner, ensuring that the
laboratory is allowed sufficient time to perform its analysis within any required holding times.
7.3.3.1 Samples shall be packaged, labeled, and documented in an area that minimizes sample contamination and provides for
safe storage. The level of custody and whether sample storage is required shall be outlined in the planning documents.
7.3.4 Chemical Storage—Safe storage areas for solvents, reagents, standards, and reference materials shall be adequate to
preserve their identity, concentration, purity, and stability prior to use.
7.3.5 Decontamination—Decontamination of sampling equipment may be performed at the location at which sampling occurs,
prior to transfer to the sampling site, or in designated areas near the sampling site. Project documentation shall specify where this
work will be performed and how it will be accomplished. If decontamination is to be conducted at the site, water and solvents of
appropriate purity shall be available. The method of accomplishing decontamination and the materials, solvents, and water purity
shall be specified in planning documents or standard operating procedures (SOPs).
7.3.6 Waste Storage Area—Waste materials may be generated during both the sampling process and on-site or in situ analysis.
Planning documents and SOPs shall outline the method for storage and disposal of these waste materials. Adequate facilities shall
be provided for the collection and storage of all wastes. These facilities shall be operated so as to minimize environmental
contamination. Waste storage and disposal facilities shall comply with applicable federal, state, and local regulations.
7.3.7 Data Storage Area—Planning documents shall specify the location of long- and short-term storage for field records. The
storage environment shall be maintained to ensure the integrity of the data. Access shall be limited to authorized personnel only.
7.4 Equipment and Instrumentation:
7.4.1 Equipment and Instrumentation—The equipment, instrumentation, and supplies required at the sampling site shall be
appropriate to accomplish the activities planned. The equipment and instrumentation shall meet the requirements of pertinent
specifications, methods, and SOPs. Before the field staff arrives at the site, a list of required items shall be prepared and checked
to ensure availability at the site.
7.4.2 Maintenance and Calibration of Equipment and Instrumentation—An SOP or operation and maintenance manual shall set
forth the methods, materials, and schedules to be used in the routine inspection, cleaning, maintenance, testing, and calibration of
the equipment and instrumentation used in performing geophysical, analytical, or in situ measurements. For common malfunctions,
procedures or manuals may outline typical problems, methods of trouble-shooting, and possible corrective actions to be taken.
Procedures shall designate a person(s) or organizationsorganization responsible for maintenance and calibration. Records of all
inspections, maintenance, repairs, testing, and calibration shall be maintained.
7.5 Standard Operating Procedures—The organization shall have written SOPs for all procedures performed routinely that
affect data quality. SOPs shall be available for the following areas and shall contain the information described:
7.5.1 Sample Management—These SOPs describe the numbering and labeling system, chain-of-custody procedures, and
tracking of samples from collection to shipment or relinquishment to the laboratory. Sample management also includes the
specification of holding times, volume of sample required by the laboratory, preservatives, and shipping requirements.
7.5.2 Reagent and Standard Preparation—These SOPs describe the procedures used to prepare standards and reagents.
Information should be included concerning the specific grades of materials used in reagent and standard preparation, appropriate
glassware and containers for preparation and storage, labeling and record keeping for stocks and dilutions, and safety precautions
to be taken.
7.5.3 Decontamination—These SOPs describe the procedures used to clean field equipment before before, after, and during the
sample collection process. TheThese SOPs should include the cleaning materials used, the order of washing and rinsing with the
cleaning materials, requirements for protecting or covering cleaned equipment, procedures for disposing of cleaning materials, and
safety considerations.
7.5.4 Sample Collection Procedures—SOPs for sample collection procedures shall describe how the procedures are actually
performed in the field and shall not be a simple reference to standard test methods, unless a procedure is performed exactly as
described in the published test method. If possible, industry-recognized test methods from source documents published by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, ASTM, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Water Well Association, American Petroleum
Institute, or other recognizedreputable organizations should be used. The SOP for sample collection procedures should include the
following information:
7.5.4.1 Applicability of the procedure,
7.5.4.2 Equipment and reagents required,
7.5.4.3 Detailed description of the procedures to be followed in collecting the samples,
7.5.4.4 Sample labeling, preservation, and storage,
7.5.4.5 Common problems encountered,
D5283 − 18
7.5.4.6 Precautions to be taken, and
7.5.4.7 Health and safety considerations.
7.5.5 Equipment Calibration and Maintenance—These SOPs describe the procedures used to ensure that field equipment and
instrumentation are in working order. The SOPs describe calibration and maintenance procedures and schedules, maintenance logs,
service contracts or service arrangements for equipment, and spare parts available in-house. in house. The calibration and
maintenance of field equipment and instrumentation should generally be in accordance with manufacturers’ specifications and shall
be documented.
7.5.6 Field Measurements—These SOPs describe all methods used in the field to determine a chemical or physical parameter.
TheThese SOPs shall address criteria from Section 8, as appropriate.
7.5.7 Corrective Action—These SOPs describe procedures used to identify and correct deficiencies in the sample collection
process. These should include specific steps to take in correcting deficiencies, such as performing additional decontamination of
equipment, resampling, or additional training of field personnel in methods procedures. The SOP shall specify that each corrective
action must be documented with a description of the deficiency, the corrective action taken, reoccurrence minimization as
appropriate, and the person(s) responsible for implementing the corrective action.
7.5.8 Data Reduction and Validation—These SOPs describe procedures used to compute the results from field measurements
and to review and validate these data. They should include all formulas used to calculate the results and procedures used to verify
independently that the field measurement results are correct.
7.5.9 Reporting—These SOPs describe the process for reporting the results of field activities.field activity results.
7.5.10 Records Management—These SOPs describe the procedures for generating, controlling, and archiving field records.
TheThese SOPs should describe the responsibilities for record generation and control and the policies for record retention,
including type, time, security, and retrieval and disposal authorities. Records should include project-specific and field operations
records.
7.5.10.1 Project-specific records relate to field work performed for a group of samples. Project records may include
correspondence, chain-of-custody, chain of custody, field notes, all reports issued as a result of the work, project planning
documents, and procedural SOPs used.
7.5.10.2 Field operations records document overall field operations. These records may include equipment performance and
maintenance logs, personnel files, general field SOPs, and corrective action reports.
7.5.11 Waste Disposal—These SOPs describe policies and procedures for the disposal of waste materials resulting from field
operations. The disposal of all wastes must conform to federal, state, and local regulations, including those associated with the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Superfund Act Reauthorization and Amendments, Department of Transportation, and
Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
7.5.12 Health and Safety—These SOPs describe policies and procedures designed both to provide a safe and healthy working
environment for field personnel and to comply with federal and state regulations.
7.6 Field Quality Assurance and Quality Control Requirements:
7.6.1 Quality Assurance Program Plan—The field organization shall have a written QAPP that describes the organization’s QA
policy. The plan shall specify the responsibilities of the field management and field staff and the QA function in the areas of QA
and QC, and it shall also describe the QC procedures followed by the organization (see EPA QAMS-004/80 for an
example).QA/R-2).
7.6.2 Quality Assurance Project Plan—Some projects, particularly those that are large or complex, require a QAPjP. The QAPjP
details the QA and QC goals and protocol for a specific data collection activity to ensure that the data generated by sampling and
analysis activities are of quality commensurate with their intended use. QAPjP elements should include a discussion of the quality
objectives of the project, identification of those involved in the data collection and their responsibilities and authorities,
enumeration of the QC procedures to be followed, and reference to the specific SOPs that will be followed for all aspects of the
project. Elements may be added or removed, as required by the project or the end-user end user of the data (see EPA QAMS-005/80
for an example).QA/R-5).
7.6.3 Control Samples—Control samples are QC samples that are introduced into a process to monitor the performance of the
system. collection or analytic system, or both. Control samples, which may include blanks, duplicates, spikes, analytical standards,
and reference materials, can be used in different phases of the overall process, beginning with sampling and continuing through
transportation, storage, and analysis. The types of control samples used, and the frequency of usage, are dependent on the DQOs
of the data collection effort and must be specified for each project.
7.6.4 Procedures for Establishing Acceptance Criteria—Procedures shall be in place for establishing acceptance criteria for field
activities, as required in the project planning documents. Acceptance criteria may be qualitative or quantitative. Field events or data
that fall outside of the established acceptance criteria may indicate a problem with the sampling process that must be investigated.
7.6.5 Deviations—Any activity not performed in accordance with the SOPs or project planning documents is considered a
deviation from the plan. Deviations from the plan may or may not affect data quality. All deviations from the plan shall be
documented as to the extent of, and reason for, the deviation.
D5283 − 18
7.6.6 Corrective Action—Errors, deficiencies, deviations, or field events or data that fall outside the established acceptance
criteria require investigation. Corrective action may be necessary to resolve the problem and restore proper functioning to the
system in some instances. Investigation of the problem and any subsequent corrective action taken shall be documented.
7.6.7 Data Handling Procedures:
7.6.7.1 Data Reduction—All field measurement data are reduced according to protocol described in the appropriate SOP.
Computer programs used for data reduction shall be validated before use and verified on a regular basis. All information used in
the calculations shall be recorded to enable reconstruction of the final result at a later date.
7.6.7.2 Data Review—All data are reviewed according to SOPs to ensure that the calculations are correct and to detect
transcription errors. Spot checks are performed on computer calculations to verify program validity.
7.6.7.3 Data Reporting—Data are reported in accordance with the requirements of the end-user.end user.
7.7 Quality Assurance Review:
7.7.1 General—The QA review consists of internal and external assessments to ensure that both QA and QC procedures are in
use and field staff conform to these procedures. Planning documents shall specify the requirements for internal, external, and
on-site assessment. These documents shall specify the frequency and documentation of these assessments.
7.7.1.1 Internal Assessment—Personnel responsible for performing field activities are responsible for continually monitoring
individual compliance with the QA and QC programs and planning documents. A QA officer or an appropriate management
designee shall review the field results and findings for compliance with the QA and QC programs and planning documents. The
results of this internal assessment should be reported to management with requirements for a plan to correct theany observed
deficiencies.
7.7.1.2 External Assessment—The field staff may be reviewed by personnel external to the organization. The results of the
external assessment should be submitted to management with requirements for a plan to correct the observed deficiencies.
7.7.1.3 On-Site Evaluation—On-site evaluations may be conducted as part of both internal and external assessments. On-site
evaluations may include, but are not limited to, a complete review of the facilities, staff, training, instrumentation, SOPs, methods,
field analysis, sample collection, QA and QC policies, and procedures related to the generation of environmental data. Records of
each evaluation shall be maintained until superseded or according to policy. These records should include the date of the
evaluation, area or site, areas reviewed, person performing the evaluation, findings and problems, actions recommended and taken
to resolve the problems, and scheduled date for re-inspection. Any problems identified that are likely to affect data integrity shall
be brought to the attention of management immediately.
7.7.2 Evaluation of Field Records—The review of field records shall be conducted by one or more persons knowledgeable in
the field activities, evaluating the following subjects at a minimum:
7.7.2.1 Completeness of Field Reports—This review ensures that all requirements for field activities in the planning documents
have been fulfilled, that complete records exist for each field activity, and that the procedures specified in the planning documents
have been implemented. The emphasis on field documentation will help assureensure sample integrity and sufficient technical
information to recreate each field event. The results of this completeness check shall be documented, and environmental data
affected by incomplete records shall be identified.
7.7.2.2 Identification of Invalid Samples—This review involves interpretation and evaluation of the field records to detect
problems affecting the representativeness of environmental samples. Examples of items that could indicate invalid samples include
improper well development, improperly screened wells, instability of pH or conductivity, and collection of volatiles near
combustion engines. The field records shall be evaluated against planning documents and SOPs. The reviewer shall document the
sample validity and identify the environmental data associated with poor or incorrect field work.
7.7.2.3 Correlation of Field Test Data—The results of field measurements obtained by more than one method shall be compared.
For example, surface geophysics may be surveyed using both ground penetrating radar and a resistivity survey.
7.7.2.4 Identification of Anomalous Field Test Data—Anomalous field test data should be identified. For example, a water
temperature for one well that is five degrees higher than any other well temperature in the same aquifer should be noted. The impact
of anomalous field measurement results on the associated environmental data shall be evaluated.
7.7.2.5 Validation of Field Analysis—All data from field analysis that are generated in situ or from a mobile laboratory shall be
validated per 8.7.2. The results of the validation shall be reported. The report shall discuss whether the QC checks meet the
acceptance criteria and whether corrective actions were taken for any analysis performed when acceptance criteria were not met.
7.7.3 Quality Assurance Reports to Management—The QA program shall provide for the periodic reporting of pertinent QA and
QC information to management to allow assessment of the overall effectiveness of the QA program. There are three major types
of QA reports to management:
7.7.3.1 Report on Measurement Quality Indicators—This report shall include the assessment of QC data (such as that generated
per 7.6.3) gathered over the period, the frequency of repeating work due to unacceptable performance, and corrective action taken.
7.7.3.2 Report on Quality Assurance Assessments—This report shall be submitted immediately following any internal or
external on-site evaluations or upon receipt of the results of any performance evaluation studies. The report shall include the results
of the assessment and the plan for correcting identified deficiencies.
7.7.3.3 Report on Key Quality Assurance Activities During the Period—A report shall be delivered to management summarizing
key QA activities during the period. The report shall stress measures that are being taken to improve data quality and shall include
D5283 − 18
a summary of the significant quality problems observed and corrective actions taken. The report shall also include a summary of
involvements in resolution of quality issues with clients or agencies, QA organizational changes, and notice of the distribution of
any revised documents controlled by the QA function.
7.8 Field Records—Records provide direct evidence and support for the necessary technical interpretations, judgments, and
discussions concerning project activities. These records, particularly those that are anticipated for use as evidentiary data, must
directly support current or ongoing technical studies and activities and must provide the historical evidence necessary for later
reviews and analyses. Records shall be legible, identifiable, and retrievable and protected from damage, deterioration, or loss. Field
records generally consist of bound field notebooks with prenumberedpre-numbered pages, sample collection forms, personnel
qualification and training forms, sample location maps, equipment maintenance and calibration forms, chain-of-custody forms,
sample analysis request forms, and field change request forms. All records shall be completed with black, waterproof ink.
Procedures for reviewing, approving, and revising field records must be defined clearly, with the lines of authority included. At
a minimum, all documentation errors shall be corrected by drawing a single line through the error and initialing by the responsible
individual, along with the date of change. The correction is written adjacent to the error. Deviations from field SOPs shall be
documented.
7.8.1 Personnel Training and Qualification Records—It is the responsibility of the organization to establish personnel
qualifications and training requirements. Each staff member shall possess the education, training, technical knowledge, and
experience, or a combination thereof, to enable that individual to perform his or her their assigned functions. Personnel
qualifications shall be documented in terms of education, experience, and training. Training shall be provided for all staff members
so that they can perform their functions properly.
7.8.2 Standard Operating Procedures—SOPs shall be available to those performing the task outlined. Any revisions to field
SOPs shall be written and distributed to all affected individuals to ensure the implementation of changes. The areas covered by
SOPs are given in 7.5.
7.8.3 Quality Assurance Plans—The QAPP and all applicable QAPjPs shall be on file.
7.8.4 Equipment Maintenance—Maintenance procedures shall be defined clearly and written for each measurement system and
required support equipment. When maintenance is necessary, it shall be documented in either standard forms or in logbooks. A
history of the maintenance record of each system serves as an indication of the adequacy of maintenance schedules and parts
inventory.
7.8.5 Calibration and Traceability of Standards and Reagents—Calibration is a reproducible reference base to which all sample
measurements can be correlated. A sound calibration program shall include provisions for documentation of the frequency,
conditions, standards, and records reflecting the calibration history of a measurement system. The accuracy of calibration standards
is an important point to consider because all data will be in reference to the standards used. A program for verifying and
documenting the accuracy of all working standards against primary grade standards shall be followed routinely.
7.8.6 Sample Collection and Tracking Records—To ensure maximum utility of the sampling effort and resulting data,
documentation of the sampling protocol, as performed in the field, is essential. At a minimum, sample collection records shall
contain the persons conducting the activity, sample number, sample location, equipment used, climatic conditions, documentation
of adherence to protocol, and unusual observations. The actual sample collection record is usually one of the following: a bound
field notebook with prenumberedpre-numbered pages, a pre-printed form, or digitized information stored on a computer tape hard
drive or disc.network.
7.8.6.1 Sample tracking records involving the possession of samples from the time at which they are obtained until they are
relinquished shall be documented with the following minimum information: (1) project name; (2) signatures of the samplers; (3)
sample number, date and time of collection, and grab or composite sample designation; (4) signatures of the individuals involved
in sample transfer; and (5) the air bill or other shipping number, if applicable.
7.8.7 Maps and Drawings—Project planning documents and reports often contain maps. The maps are used to document the
location of sample collection points and monitoring wells, and as a means of presenting environmental data. Information used to
prepare maps and drawings is normally obtained through field surveys, property surveys, surveys of monitoring wells, aerial
photography, or photogrammetric mapping. The final, approved maps shall have a revision number and date and shall be subject
to the same controls as other project records.
7.8.8 Results from Control Samples—Documentation for the collection of QC samples, such as field, trip, and equipment rinsate
blanks, duplicate samples, spikes, and reference materials, shall be maintained.
7.8.9 Correspondence—Project correspondence can provide evidence supporting technical interpretations. Correspondence
pertinent to the project shall be kept and placed in the project files.
7.8.10 Deviations—Field changes and deviations from the planning documents shall be reviewed and approved by either the
authorized personnel who performed the original technical review, or their designees. All deviations from the procedural and
planning documents shall be recorded in the site log.
7.8.11 Final Report—The final report shall summarize the field activities, data, results of deviations from the planning
documents, and interpretation of the data. The planning documents shall outline the items to be included in the report, which may
include any special formats required, QC reporting requirements, conclusions, and recommendations.
7.9 Documentation Storage:
---------------------
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...