Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Extraction of Paint, Dust, Soil, and Air Samples for Subsequent Determination of Lead

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Ultrasonic extraction using dilute nitric acid is a simpler and easier method for extracting lead from environmental samples than are traditional digestion methods that employ hot plate or microwave digestion with concentrated acids (3), (5), (7), (8). Hence, ultrasonic extraction may be used in lieu of the more rigorous strong acid/high temperature digestion methods (for example, see Ref (3) and Test Method E1613), provided that the performance is demonstrated using accepted criteria as delineated in Guide E1775.  
5.2 In contrast with hot plate or microwave digestion techniques, ultrasonic extraction is field-portable, which allows for on-site sample analysis.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers an ultrasonic extraction procedure for the extraction of lead from environmental samples of interest in lead abatement and renovation (or related) work, for analytical purposes.  
1.2 Environmental matrices of concern include dry paint films, settled dusts, soils, and air particulates.  
1.3 Samples subjected to ultrasonic extraction are prepared for subsequent determination of lead by laboratory analytical methods.  
1.4 This practice includes, where applicable, descriptions of procedures for sample homogenization and weighing prior to ultrasonic extraction.  
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-Oct-2021
Technical Committee
D22 - Air Quality

Relations

Effective Date
01-Apr-2024
Effective Date
01-Apr-2024
Effective Date
01-Mar-2024
Effective Date
01-Sep-2023
Effective Date
15-Dec-2018
Effective Date
01-Oct-2018
Effective Date
01-Sep-2018
Effective Date
01-Mar-2017
Effective Date
01-Jan-2016
Effective Date
01-Jan-2016
Effective Date
01-Mar-2015
Effective Date
01-Nov-2014
Effective Date
01-Oct-2013
Effective Date
15-Jul-2012
Effective Date
15-Aug-2011

Overview

ASTM E1979-21, titled Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Extraction of Paint, Dust, Soil, and Air Samples for Subsequent Determination of Lead, provides a field-portable, efficient, and simpler alternative to conventional digestion methods for extracting lead from various environmental matrices. This standard is developed by ASTM, ensuring alignment with internationally recognized quality and reproducibility principles. It is crucial for environmental testing labs, remediation professionals, and industrial hygienists involved in lead abatement, renovation, and risk assessment.

The practice details ultrasonic extraction procedures using dilute nitric acid for samples such as dry paint films, settled dust, soils, and airborne particulates. Subsequently, these samples are prepared for laboratory-based lead determination using established analytical techniques.

Key Topics

  • Ultrasonic Extraction Process: Utilizes ultrasonic energy in combination with dilute nitric acid to solubilize lead from environmental samples. It avoids the need for high-temperature, strong acid digestion required by traditional methods.
  • Field-Portability: The ultrasonic extraction method is designed to be portable, enabling on-site sample preparation and preliminary analysis, which is especially useful for time-sensitive abatement and renovation activities.
  • Sample Preparation: Includes standardized protocols for homogenizing, weighing, and handling paint, dust, soil, and air samples to ensure accurate and representative results.
  • Quality Assurance: Emphasizes implementation of QA/QC practices according to established guides (e.g., ASTM Guide E1775) to maintain result reliability and regulatory compliance.
  • Documentation: Mandates detailed recording of sample collection, preparation, and processing steps to support data traceability and quality control.

Applications

  • Lead Abatement Projects: Used extensively in lead risk assessment and abatement in residential, commercial, and industrial settings where paint, dust, or soil contamination is suspected.
  • Environmental Monitoring: Supports regulatory compliance by facilitating the measurement of lead in ambient air particulates, settled dust, and soils at construction, demolition, or renovation sites.
  • Remediation Verification: Provides rapid and reliable sample extraction for follow-up analysis to verify the success of remediation efforts and ensure environments are safe for occupancy.
  • Laboratory and Field Testing: Suitable for both laboratory-based analytical workflows and field-portable setups, making it ideal for environmental consultants and laboratories that require flexibility and efficiency.
  • Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Health: Assists in monitoring worker and community exposure to lead by enabling rapid extraction and subsequent analysis of workplace and environmental samples.

Related Standards

  • ASTM E1613: Test Method for Determination of Lead by ICP-AES, FAAS, or GFAAS; referenced as an analytical follow-up to the extraction.
  • ASTM E1727/E1728/E1729: Practices for collection of soil, settled dust, and dried paint samples for subsequent lead determination; ensure representative sampling prior to extraction.
  • ASTM D5438/D7144: Practices for collection of floor and surface dust using wipe and vacuum methods.
  • ASTM D1193: Specification for reagent water used in the extraction process.
  • ASTM E1775: Guide for evaluating performance of field extraction and analysis methods for lead; vital for establishing QA/QC protocols.
  • NIOSH Methods 7082, 7105, 7300: Referenced methodologies for further analysis after ultrasonic extraction.
  • EPA Standard Operating Procedures: Cited for background and validation of ultrasonic extraction protocols.

By adopting ASTM E1979-21, laboratories and field practitioners benefit from a validated, cost-effective, and safer approach to preparing environmental samples for lead determination, supporting informed decision-making in public health, environmental protection, and regulatory compliance.

Buy Documents

Standard

ASTM E1979-21 - Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Extraction of Paint, Dust, Soil, and Air Samples for Subsequent Determination of Lead

English language (7 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off
Standard

REDLINE ASTM E1979-21 - Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Extraction of Paint, Dust, Soil, and Air Samples for Subsequent Determination of Lead

English language (7 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

ECOCERT

Organic and sustainability certification.

COFRAC France Verified

BSMI (Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection)

Taiwan's standards and inspection authority.

TAF Taiwan Verified

Eurofins Food Testing Global

Global leader in food, environment, and pharmaceutical product testing.

COFRAC Luxembourg Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

ASTM E1979-21 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Extraction of Paint, Dust, Soil, and Air Samples for Subsequent Determination of Lead". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Ultrasonic extraction using dilute nitric acid is a simpler and easier method for extracting lead from environmental samples than are traditional digestion methods that employ hot plate or microwave digestion with concentrated acids (3), (5), (7), (8). Hence, ultrasonic extraction may be used in lieu of the more rigorous strong acid/high temperature digestion methods (for example, see Ref (3) and Test Method E1613), provided that the performance is demonstrated using accepted criteria as delineated in Guide E1775. 5.2 In contrast with hot plate or microwave digestion techniques, ultrasonic extraction is field-portable, which allows for on-site sample analysis. SCOPE 1.1 This practice covers an ultrasonic extraction procedure for the extraction of lead from environmental samples of interest in lead abatement and renovation (or related) work, for analytical purposes. 1.2 Environmental matrices of concern include dry paint films, settled dusts, soils, and air particulates. 1.3 Samples subjected to ultrasonic extraction are prepared for subsequent determination of lead by laboratory analytical methods. 1.4 This practice includes, where applicable, descriptions of procedures for sample homogenization and weighing prior to ultrasonic extraction. 1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Ultrasonic extraction using dilute nitric acid is a simpler and easier method for extracting lead from environmental samples than are traditional digestion methods that employ hot plate or microwave digestion with concentrated acids (3), (5), (7), (8). Hence, ultrasonic extraction may be used in lieu of the more rigorous strong acid/high temperature digestion methods (for example, see Ref (3) and Test Method E1613), provided that the performance is demonstrated using accepted criteria as delineated in Guide E1775. 5.2 In contrast with hot plate or microwave digestion techniques, ultrasonic extraction is field-portable, which allows for on-site sample analysis. SCOPE 1.1 This practice covers an ultrasonic extraction procedure for the extraction of lead from environmental samples of interest in lead abatement and renovation (or related) work, for analytical purposes. 1.2 Environmental matrices of concern include dry paint films, settled dusts, soils, and air particulates. 1.3 Samples subjected to ultrasonic extraction are prepared for subsequent determination of lead by laboratory analytical methods. 1.4 This practice includes, where applicable, descriptions of procedures for sample homogenization and weighing prior to ultrasonic extraction. 1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

ASTM E1979-21 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 17.140.99 - Other standards related to acoustics; 71.040.50 - Physicochemical methods of analysis. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ASTM E1979-21 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM E1792-24, ASTM E1729-24, ASTM E1727-24, ASTM D5438-23, ASTM E1605-18b, ASTM E1605-18a, ASTM E1605-18, ASTM D5438-17, ASTM E1728-16, ASTM E1775-07(2016), ASTM E631-15, ASTM E631-14, ASTM D6785-13, ASTM E1605-04(2012), ASTM D5438-11. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ASTM E1979-21 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: E1979 − 21
Standard Practice for
Ultrasonic Extraction of Paint, Dust, Soil, and Air Samples
for Subsequent Determination of Lead
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1979; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope D5438 Practice for Collection of Floor Dust for Chemical
Analysis
1.1 This practice covers an ultrasonic extraction procedure
D6785 Test Method for Determination of Lead inWorkplace
for the extraction of lead from environmental samples of
Air Using Flame or Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption
interest in lead abatement and renovation (or related) work, for
Spectrometry
analytical purposes.
D7144 Practice for Collection of Surface Dust by Micro-
1.2 Environmental matrices of concern include dry paint
vacuum Sampling for Subsequent Determination of Met-
films, settled dusts, soils, and air particulates.
als and Metalloids
1.3 Samples subjected to ultrasonic extraction are prepared D8358 GuideforAssessmentandInclusionofWallDeposits
in the Analysis of Single-Stage Samplers for Airborne
for subsequent determination of lead by laboratory analytical
methods. Particulate Matter
E631 Terminology of Building Constructions
1.4 This practice includes, where applicable, descriptions of
E1605 Terminology Relating to Lead in Buildings
procedures for sample homogenization and weighing prior to
E1613 Test Method for Determination of Lead by Induc-
ultrasonic extraction.
tively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
(ICP-AES), Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
(FAAS), or Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spec-
standard.
trometry (GFAAS) Techniques (Withdrawn 2021)
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the E1726 Practice for Preparation of Soil Samples by Hotplate
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the Digestion for Subsequent Lead Analysis
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro- E1727 Practice for Field Collection of Soil Samples for
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter- Subsequent Lead Determination
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. E1728 PracticeforCollectionofSettledDustSamplesUsing
1.7 This international standard was developed in accor- Wipe Sampling Methods for Subsequent Lead Determi-
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard- nation
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the E1729 Practice for Field Collection of Dried Paint Samples
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom- for Subsequent Lead Determination
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical E1775 Guide for Evaluating Performance of On-Site Extrac-
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. tion and Field-Portable Electrochemical or Spectrophoto-
metric Analysis for Lead
2. Referenced Documents
E1792 Specification for Wipe Sampling Materials for Lead
in Surface Dust
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D1193 Specification for Reagent Water
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms relating to this
This practice is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D22 on Air Quality
practice that do not appear in this section, refer to Terminolo-
and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D22.12 on Sampling and Analysis
gies E631 and E1605.
of Lead for Exposure and Risk Assessment.
Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2021. Published January 2023. Formerly PS 3.1.1 extraction, n—the dissolution of target analytes from a
87–97. Originally adopted by Committee E06 in 1998. Last previous edition
solid matrix into a liquid form.
approved in 2017 as E1979 – 17. DOI: 10.1520/E1979-21.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
the ASTM website. www.astm.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E1979 − 21
3.1.1.1 Discussion—During sample digestion or extraction, 5.2 In contrast with hot plate or microwave digestion
target analytes are extracted (solubilized) into solution to techniques,ultrasonicextractionisfield-portable,whichallows
enable subsequent determination by analytical techniques (for for on-site sample analysis.
example, see Test Method E1613).
6. Apparatus and Materials
3.1.2 ultrasonic extraction, n—the use of ultrasonic energy
6.1 Sonicator, 50 W minimum power; proper operation of
and acidic or basic solution to extract targeted analytes from
the sonicator shall be confirmed prior to initial use and
samples.
periodically thereafter.
3.1.2.1 Discussion—The extract solution is subsequently
analyzed for the determination of targeted analytes.
6.2 Plastic Centrifuge Tubes, 50 mL, with screw caps.
6.3 Analytical Balance, accuracy better than or equal to
4. Summary of Practice
60.002 g.
4.1 Samples of paint, settled dust (wipe or vacuum), soil, or
6.4 Mortar and Pestle, pug mill, or wigglebug.
airborne particles, obtained byASTM sample collection meth-
6.5 Dry Ice (CO (s)).
ods (see Practice E1729; Practice E1728, Practice D5438 and
Practice D7144; Practice E1727, respectively), are subjected to
6.6 Cooler, for storage of dry ice.
ultrasonic extraction in dilute nitric acid for a delineated time
6.7 Plastic or Glass Rods, 0.6 to 1.0 cm diameter,
period.
15 to 20 cm length; tapered at one end to conform to the shape
4.2 Paint samples are ground, homogenized and weighed, if
of the bottoms of the 50 mL centrifuge tubes.
necessary, prior to ultrasonic extraction.
6.8 Powderless Plastic Gloves.
4.3 Soil and bulk dust vacuum samples are sieved,
6.9 Tweezers.
homogenized, and weighed prior to ultrasonic extraction.
6.10 Class A Pipets, 5 or 10 mLor both, and other volumes
4.4 If applicable, airborne particulate and settled dust filter
as needed.
samples are weighed prior to ultrasonic extraction.
NOTE 1—Precision digital mechanical pipettors using replaceable tips
4.4.1 Preweighed filters assembled into closed-face cas-
meet Class A requirements.
settes as in NIOSH methods 0500 or 0600 (1) are used to
collect airborne particulate according toTest Method D6785 or 6.11 Laboratory Wipes, wet or dry, or both.
to collect settled dust according to Practice D7144.
6.12 Power Source for Sonicator.
4.4.2 Closed-face cassettes using internal capsules as in
6.13 Sieves, Number 10 (1.9 mm) and 250 µm.
NIOSH methods 0501, 5100, or 7306 (2) are used to collect
airborne particulate according to Test Method D6785 or to
6.14 Collection Tray.
collect settled dust according to Practice D7144.
6.15 Rubber Mallet.
4.5 Sample extracts are diluted with ASTM Type I water
6.16 Nylon Brush.
(see Specification D1193) in preparation for subsequent deter-
6.17 Aluminum Pie Tins.
mination of lead by analytical techniques (for example Test
Method E1613, Guide E1775, and NIOSH methods 7082,
6.18 Dust Mask.
7105, and 7300 (3) ).
6.19 Glass or Plastic Stirring Rods.
4.6 This practice was developed based on an EPA standard
6.20 Aluminum Foil (conventional thickness for household
operating procedure (ultrasonic extraction followed by colori-
use, that is, not heavy duty).
metric lead analysis (4)) and published protocols (ultrasonic
6.21 Graphite Pencil.
extraction followed by anodic stripping voltammetric determi-
nation of lead) (5)(6).
7. Reagents
7.1 ASTM Type I Water, in accordance with Specification
5. Significance and Use
D1193.
5.1 Ultrasonic extraction using dilute nitric acid is a simpler
NOTE 2—Commercially available distilled or deionized water meets
and easier method for extracting lead from environmental
ASTM Type I water specifications.
samples than are traditional digestion methods that employ hot
plate or microwave digestion with concentrated acids (3), (5), 7.2 Extraction Solution, 10 % or 25 % v/v HNO /H O;
3 2
prepared from reagent grade concentrated nitric acid (70 to
(7), (8). Hence, ultrasonic extraction may be used in lieu of the
more rigorous strong acid/high temperature digestion methods 71 % HNO ) and ASTM Type I water.
(for example, see Ref (3) and Test Method E1613), provided
NOTE 3—Air filter samples require 10 % nitric acid (v/v) for extraction,
that the performance is demonstrated using accepted criteria as
while all other sample matrices require 25 % v/v HNO /H O.
3 2
delineated in Guide E1775.
8. Procedure
8.1 Testing of Sonicator:
8.1.1 Before use, ensure proper operation of the sonicator
The boldface numbers given in parentheses refer to a list of references at the
end of the text. by employing the following diagnostic test.
E1979 − 21
8.1.1.1 Turn on the sonicator and allow for a reasonable 8.2.2.2 Alternatively, place paint film sample in a clean, dry
warm-up period, as recommended by the instrument manufac- 50 mL centrifuge tube, and place the tube in dry ice. Using a
turer. plastic or metal rod, grind and homogenize the super-cooled,
8.1.1.2 Insert the tip of a graphite pencil into the bath. brittle paint sample to a fine powder. Thoroughly clean rod
with laboratory wipes prior to and following grinding proce-
8.1.1.3 If the sonication device is operating properly, graph-
dure. Avoid condensation of water onto the sample by sealing
ite in solution will be observed streaming off the tip of the
the sample and allowing it to warm to ambient temperature
pencil.
before weighing.
8.1.2 Alternatively, demonstrate proper operation of the
sonicator according to the following procedure:
NOTE 5—The use of dry ice as described assists greatly in the grinding
8.1.2.1 Fill the sonicator bath with warm water (ca. 45 °C)
and homogenization of dry paint film samples.
to a level about half-full, and add a small amount (for example,
8.2.3 If the total sample mass is greater than or equal to
three drops) of surfactant
0.25 g, or if the total sample mass is less than 0.25 g and the
8.1.2.2 Turn on the sonicator for a minimum of 5 min to
desired reported lead concentration is to be in units of mass of
degas the solution. Turn off the sonicator.
lead per unit mass of sample, weigh 0.05 to 0.25 g of ground
8.1.2.3 Place aluminum foil (that is cut to a size conforming
and homogenized paint sample to the nearest 60.002 g, and
1 3
to ⁄2 to ⁄4 of the area of the bottom of the sonicator bath) on
record the sample mass.
the bottom of the sonicator bath. Lower the foil at an angle to
NOTE 6—If the desired reporting units are to be in terms of mass of lead
prevent the trapping of air beneath the foil. Ensure that a
per unit area of sample, and the sample mass is estimated to be less than
narrow layer of solution remains between the foil and the
0.25 g, a larger sample may be collected in order to obtain more mass
bottom of the sonicator bath. The foil shall be parallel and
(thereby enabling the sample to be treated as described in 8.2.1.1).
centered to the bottom of the sonicator.
8.2.4 If the total sample mass is less than 0.25 g and the
8.1.2.4 Turn on the sonicator for a period of 45 s.
desired reported lead concentration is to be in terms of mass of
8.1.2.5 Examinethealuminumfoilaftersonication.Thefoil
leadperunitareaofcollectedsample,thenthesampleneednot
should be observed to contain a myriad of small holes and
be weighed. However, the entire ground and homogenized
bumps, and may be torn apart. Also, the perforation observed
sample must be placed in the tube for extraction as described
should be uniform; that is, all portions of the foil should be
below.
observed to have a high density of holes and perhaps tears. If
8.2.5 Place the sample in a clean, dry, labeled 50 mL
the foil is not affected in this manner, then the sonicator
polypropylene centrifuge tube. To ensure quantitative sample
performance is inadequate for the purposes of this practice.
transfer, rinse materials used for transferring samples with a
8.2 Dry Paint Film Samples:
minimum of dilute (5 %) nitric acid, and direct the rinsate into
the centrifuge tube.
NOTE 4—This practice assumes paint samples collected in accordance
8.2.6 Using a class A pipet, introduce 5 mL of 25 % HNO
with Practice E1729.
to the centrifuge tube containing the ground and homogenized
8.2.1 Don a pair of gloves.
paint sample. Shake the centrifuge tube briefly to ensure that
8.2.1.1 Ifthedesiredreportedleadconcentrationunitsareto
no solid paint material remains stuck to the bottom of the tube.
be in terms of lead mass per unit area of sample, and the
Rinse the inside of the centrifuge tube with a minimum
estimated sample mass is greater than or equal to 0.25 g, then
quantity of 5 % HNO in order to ensure immersion of all solid
quantitatively transfer the entire sample to an analytical bal-
material.
ance and weigh to the nearest 60.002 g. Under these
8.2.7 Cap the centrifuge tube, and place in an upright
circumstances, do quantitative transfer and sample weighing
position in the sonicator bath.
prior to grinding and homogenization as described later in this
8.2.8 Ensure that the bath of the sonicator contains enough
practice.
water so that the water level is at least 2.5 cm above the level
8.2.1.2 If the desired reporting units of lead concentration
of liquid within the centrifuge tube.
are to be in terms of lead mass per unit mass of sample, or if
8.2.9 Repeat steps 8.2.1 – 8.2.8 as needed, depending on the
the desired reporting units are to be in terms of lead mass per
size of the ultrasonic bath and the number of samples.
unit area and the estimated mass of the sample is less than 0.25
g, then quantitatively transfer the sample to a mortar and pestle
NOTE 7—Depending on the size of the sonicator, many centrifuge tubes
or a labeled 50 mL centrifuge tube. Use tweezers if necessary may be immersed in the bath at one time.Acustom rack for the centrifuge
tubesmaybepurchasedorconstructedtoallowfortheregularandorderly
for quantitative sample transfer. Clean tweezers before and
placement of multiple tubes in the sonicator bath.
after use with laboratory wipes.
8.2.10 Apply ultrasonic energy to the crushed and acidified
8.2.2 Sample Grinding and Homogenization:
samples within the immersed centrifuge tubes for at least
8.2.2.1 Grind and homogenize paint film sample to a fine
30 min.
powder using a mortar and pestle, pug mill, or wigglebug.
8.2.11 Remove centrifuge tubes from the bath. Keep tubes
Quantitatively transfer the ground and homogenized a paint
in upright position.
sample to a weighing vessel or weighing paper (see below).
Thoroughly clean mortar and pestle, wigglebug, or pug mill 8.2.12 Remove caps from centrifuge tubes that contain
with moistened laboratory wipes prior to and following samples that were subjected to ultrasonic agitation, and dilute
grinding, and then dry. acidified extracts to the 50 mL mark withASTM Type I water.
E1979 − 21
8.2.13 Re-cap and then shake the tubes for 5 to 10 s, and 8.3.14 Cap and then shake the tubes for 5 to 10 s, and allow
allow the contents to settle. The samples are now ready for the contents of the tubes to settle. The samples are now ready
analysis for lead content. for analysis for lead content.
NOTE 12—The sample solutions may require filtration or centrifugation
NOTE 8—The sample solutions may require filtration or centrifugation
prior to analysis.
prior to analysis.
8.4 Settled Dust Vacuum Filter Samples:
8.3 Settled Dust Wipe Samples:
NOTE 13—This assumes dust samples collected according to Practice
NOTE 9—This procedure assumes dust wipe samples were collected in
D7144.
accordance with Practice E1728 using wipes that conform to Specification
E1792.
8.4.1 Don a pair of gloves.
8.4.2 If a pre-weighed filter cassette or a cassette with a
8.3.1 Don a pair of gloves.
pre-weighed internal capsule was employed for sample
8.3.2 If not already placed in a labeled 50 mL centrifuge
collection, weigh the filter and all cassette contents (see Guide
tube, remove the wipe sample from the sample container with
D8358), or the capsule to the nearest 60.002 g and record the
a pair of clean tweezers, and place it in a labeled clean and dry
mass.
50 mL centrifuge tube. Shove the wipe to the bottom of the
8.4.3 Open filter cassette, and, with gentle tapping, transfer
tube with a clean glass or plastic rod. Rinse the original sample
into a labeled 50 mL centrifuge tube all dust that does not
container (if applicable), tweezers and rod with a minimum of
adhere to the filter within the filter cassette.
dilute (5 %) nitric acid to ensure quantitative sample transfer;
8.4.4 Using clean tweezers, remove the filter from the filter
make sure that the rinsate falls into the centrifuge tube. Clean
cassette and place in the same centrifuge tube as that contain-
tweezers and rods before and after use with laboratory wipes.
ing the un-adhered dust previously transferred. Using a plastic
8.3.3 Using a classApipet, introduce 15 mLof 25 % HNO
or glass rod, shove the filter sample to the bottom of the
to the centrifuge tube containing the wipe sample, and cap the
centrifuge tube.To effect quantitative sample transfer, rinse the
tube. If needed, add more diluted 25 % HNO in 5 mLaliquots
tweezers and rod with a minimum of dilute (5 %) nitric acid,
toensurethatthewipeiscompletelycoveredbyacidextraction
ensuring that the rinsate is directed into the centrifuge tube.
solution. If bubbles are observed inside of the immersed wipe,
Clean tweezers and rod prior to and following use with
ap
...


This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: E1979 − 17 E1979 − 21
Standard Practice for
Ultrasonic Extraction of Paint, Dust, Soil, and Air Samples
for Subsequent Determination of Lead
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1979; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This practice covers an ultrasonic extraction procedure for the extraction of lead from environmental samples of interest in
lead abatement and renovation (or related) work, for analytical purposes.
1.2 Environmental matrices of concern include dry paint films, settled dusts, soils, and air particulates.
1.3 Samples subjected to ultrasonic extraction are prepared for subsequent determination of lead by laboratory analytical methods.
1.4 This practice includes, where applicable, descriptions of procedures for sample homogenization and weighing prior to
ultrasonic extraction.
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.6 This practicestandard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this practicestandard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices
and determine the applicability of regulatory limitationlimitations prior to use.
1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D1193 Specification for Reagent Water
D5438 Practice for Collection of Floor Dust for Chemical Analysis
D6785 Test Method for Determination of Lead in Workplace Air Using Flame or Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry
D7144 Practice for Collection of Surface Dust by Micro-vacuum Sampling for Subsequent Determination of Metals and
Metalloids
D8358 Guide for Assessment and Inclusion of Wall Deposits in the Analysis of Single-Stage Samplers for Airborne Particulate
Matter
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D22 on Air Quality and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D22.12 on Sampling and
Analysis,Analysis of Lead,Lead for Exposure and Risk Assessment.
Current edition approved March 1, 2017Nov. 1, 2021. Published March 2017January 2023. Formerly PS 87–97. Originally adopted by Committee E06 in 1998. Last
previous edition approved in 20162017 as E1979-12(2016).E1979 – 17. DOI: 10.1520/E1979-17.10.1520/E1979-21.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E1979 − 21
E631 Terminology of Building Constructions
E1605 Terminology Relating to Lead in Buildings
E1613 Test Method for Determination of Lead by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES),
Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS), or Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (GFAAS) Techniques
(Withdrawn 2021)
E1726 Practice for Preparation of Soil Samples by Hotplate Digestion for Subsequent Lead Analysis
E1727 Practice for Field Collection of Soil Samples for Subsequent Lead Determination
E1728 Practice for Collection of Settled Dust Samples Using Wipe Sampling Methods for Subsequent Lead Determination
E1729 Practice for Field Collection of Dried Paint Samples for Subsequent Lead Determination
E1775 Guide for Evaluating Performance of On-Site Extraction and Field-Portable Electrochemical or Spectrophotometric
Analysis for Lead
E1792 Specification for Wipe Sampling Materials for Lead in Surface Dust
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:Definitions For —For definitions of terms relating to this practice that do not appear in this section, refer to
Terminologies E631 and E1605.
3.1.1 extraction—extraction, n—the dissolution of target analytes from a solid matrix into a liquid form.
3.1.1.1 Discussion—
During sample digestion or extraction, target analytes are extracted (solubilized) into solution to enable subsequent determination
by analytical techniques (for example, see Test Method E1613).
3.1.2 ultrasonic extraction—extraction, n—the use of ultrasonic energy and acidic or basic solution to extract targeted analytes
from samples.
3.1.2.1 Discussion—
The extract solution is subsequently analyzed for the determination of targeted analytes.
4. Summary of Practice
4.1 Samples of paint, settled dust (wipe or vacuum), soil, or airborne particles, obtained by ASTM sample collection methods (see
Practice E1729; Practice E1728, Practice D5438 and Practice D7144; Practice E1727, respectively), are subjected to ultrasonic
extraction in dilute nitric acid for a delineated time period.
4.2 Paint samples are ground, homogenized and weighed, if necessary, prior to ultrasonic extraction.
4.3 Soil and bulk dust vacuum samples are sieved, homogenized, and weighed prior to ultrasonic extraction.
4.4 If applicable, airborne particulate and settled dust filter samples are weighed prior to ultrasonic extraction.
4.4.1 Preweighed filters assembled into closed-face cassettes as in NIOSH methods 0500 or 0600 (1) are used to collect airborne
particulate according to Test Method D6785 or to collect settled dust according to Practice D7144.
4.4.2 Closed-face cassettes using internal capsules as in NIOSH methods 0501, 5100, or 7306 (2) are used to collect airborne
particulate according to Test Method D6785 or to collect settled dust according to Practice D7144.
4.5 Sample extracts are diluted with ASTM Type I water (see Specification D1193) in preparation for subsequent determination
of lead by analytical techniques (for example Test Method E1613, Guide E1775, and NIOSH methods 7082, 7105, and 7300 (13) ).
4.6 This practice was developed based on an EPA standard operating procedure (ultrasonic extraction followed by colorimetric
lead analysis (24)) and published protocols (ultrasonic extraction followed by anodic stripping voltammetric determination of lead)
(35) (46).
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on www.astm.org.
The boldface numbers given in parentheses refer to a list of references at the end of the text.
E1979 − 21
5. Significance and Use
5.1 Ultrasonic extraction using dilute nitric acid is a simpler and easier method for extracting lead from environmental samples
than are traditional digestion methods that employ hot plate or microwave digestion with concentrated acids (13), (35), (57), (68).
Hence, ultrasonic extraction may be used in lieu of the more rigorous strong acid/high temperature digestion methods (for example,
see Ref (13) and Test Method E1613), provided that the performance is demonstrated using accepted criteria as delineated in Guide
E1775.
5.2 In contrast with hot plate or microwave digestion techniques, ultrasonic extraction is field-portable, which allows for on-site
sample analysis.
6. Apparatus and Materials
6.1 Sonicator, 50 W minimum power; proper operation of the sonicator shall be confirmed prior to initial use and periodically
thereafter.
6.2 Plastic Centrifuge Tubes, 50 mL, with screw caps.
6.3 Analytical Balance, accuracy better than or equal to
60.002 g.
6.4 Mortar and Pestle, pug mill, or wigglebug.
6.5 Dry Ice (CO (s)).
6.6 Cooler, for storage of dry ice.
6.7 Plastic or Glass Rods, 0.6 to 1.0 cm diameter,
15 to 20 cm length; tapered at one end to conform to the shape of the bottoms of the 50 mL centrifuge tubes.
6.8 Powderless Plastic Gloves.
6.9 Tweezers.
6.10 Class A Pipets, 5 or 10 mL or both, and other volumes as needed.
NOTE 1—Precision digital mechanical pipettors using replaceable tips meet Class A requirements.
6.11 Laboratory Wipes, wet or dry, or both.
6.12 Power Source for Sonicator.
6.13 Sieves, Number 10 (1.9 mm) and 250 μm.
6.14 Collection Tray.
6.15 Rubber Mallet.
6.16 Nylon Brush.
6.17 Aluminum Pie Tins.
E1979 − 21
6.18 Dust Mask.
6.19 Glass or Plastic Stirring Rods.
6.20 Aluminum Foil (conventional thickness for household use, that is, not heavy duty).
6.21 Graphite Pencil.
7. Reagents
7.1 ASTM Type I Water, in accordance with Specification D1193.
NOTE 2—Commercially available distilled or deionized water meets ASTM Type I water specifications.
7.2 Extraction Solution, 10 % or 25 % v/v HNO /H O; prepared from reagent grade concentrated nitric acid (70 to 71 % HNO )
3 2 3
and ASTM Type I water.
NOTE 3—Air filter samples require 10 % nitric acid (v/v) for extraction, while all other sample matrices require 25 % v/v HNO /H O.
3 2
8. Procedure
8.1 Testing of Sonicator:
8.1.1 Before use, ensure proper operation of the sonicator by employing the following diagnostic test.
8.1.1.1 Turn on the sonicator and allow for a reasonable warm-up period, as recommended by the instrument manufacturer.
8.1.1.2 Insert the tip of a graphite pencil into the bath.
8.1.1.3 If the sonication device is operating properly, graphite in solution will be observed streaming off the tip of the pencil.
8.1.2 Alternatively, demonstrate proper operation of the sonicator according to the following procedure:
8.1.2.1 Fill the sonicator bath with warm water (ca. 45 °C) to a level about half-full, and add a small amount (for example, three
drops) of surfactant
8.1.2.2 Turn on the sonicator for a minimum of 5 min to degas the solution. Turn off the sonicator.
1 3
8.1.2.3 Place aluminum foil (that is cut to a size conforming to ⁄2 to ⁄4 of the area of the bottom of the sonicator bath) on the
bottom of the sonicator bath. Lower the foil at an angle to prevent the trapping of air beneath the foil. Ensure that a narrow layer
of solution remains between the foil and the bottom of the sonicator bath. The foil shall be parallel and centered to the bottom of
the sonicator.
8.1.2.4 Turn on the sonicator for a period of 45 s.
8.1.2.5 Examine the aluminum foil after sonication. The foil should be observed to contain a myriad of small holes and bumps,
and may be torn apart. Also, the perforation observed should be uniform; that is, all portions of the foil should be observed to have
a high density of holes and perhaps tears. If the foil is not affected in this manner, then the sonicator performance is inadequate
for the purposes of this practice.
8.2 Dry Paint Film Samples:
NOTE 4—This practice assumes paint samples collected in accordance with Practice E1729.
8.2.1 Don a pair of gloves.
E1979 − 21
8.2.1.1 If the desired reported lead concentration units are to be in terms of lead mass per unit area of sample, and the estimated
sample mass is greater than or equal to 0.25 g, then quantitatively transfer the entire sample to an analytical balance and weigh
to the nearest 60.002 g. Under these circumstances, do quantitative transfer and sample weighing prior to grinding and
homogenization as described later in this practice.
8.2.1.2 If the desired reporting units of lead concentration are to be in terms of lead mass per unit mass of sample, or if the desired
reporting units are to be in terms of lead mass per unit area and the estimated mass of the sample is less than 0.25 g, then
quantitatively transfer the sample to a mortar and pestle or a labeled 50 mL centrifuge tube. Use tweezers if necessary for
quantitative sample transfer. Clean tweezers before and after use with laboratory wipes.
8.2.2 Sample Grinding and Homogenization:
8.2.2.1 Grind and homogenize paint film sample to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle, pug mill, or wigglebug. Quantitatively
transfer the ground and homogenized a paint sample to a weighing vessel or weighing paper (see below). Thoroughly clean mortar
and pestle, wigglebug, or pug mill with moistened laboratory wipes prior to and following grinding, and then dry.
8.2.2.2 Alternatively, place paint film sample in a clean, dry 50 mL centrifuge tube, and place the tube in dry ice. Using a plastic
or metal rod, grind and homogenize the super-cooled, brittle paint sample to a fine powder. Thoroughly clean rod with laboratory
wipes prior to and following grinding procedure. Avoid condensation of water onto the sample by sealing the sample and allowing
it to warm to ambient temperature before weighing.
NOTE 5—The use of dry ice as described assists greatly in the grinding and homogenization of dry paint film samples.
8.2.3 If the total sample mass is greater than or equal to 0.25 g, or if the total sample mass is less than 0.25 g and the desired
reported lead concentration is to be in units of mass of lead per unit mass of sample, weigh 0.05 to 0.25 g of ground and
homogenized paint sample to the nearest 60.002 g, and record the sample mass.
NOTE 6—If the desired reporting units are to be in terms of mass of lead per unit area of sample, and the sample mass is estimated to be less than 0.25
g, a larger sample may be collected in order to obtain more mass (thereby enabling the sample to be treated as described in 8.2.1.1).
8.2.4 If the total sample mass is less than 0.25 g and the desired reported lead concentration is to be in terms of mass of lead per
unit area of collected sample, then the sample need not be weighed. However, the entire ground and homogenized sample must
be placed in the tube for extraction as described below.
8.2.5 Place the sample in a clean, dry, labeled 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tube. To ensure quantitative sample transfer, rinse
materials used for transferring samples with a minimum of dilute (5 %) nitric acid, and direct the rinsate into the centrifuge tube.
8.2.6 Using a class A pipet, introduce 5 mL of 25 % HNO to the centrifuge tube containing the ground and homogenized paint
sample. Shake the centrifuge tube briefly to ensure that no solid paint material remains stuck to the bottom of the tube. Rinse the
inside of the centrifuge tube with a minimum quantity of 5 % HNO in order to ensure immersion of all solid material.
8.2.7 Cap the centrifuge tube, and place in an upright position in the sonicator bath.
8.2.8 Ensure that the bath of the sonicator contains enough water so that the water level is at least 2.5 cm above the level of liquid
within the centrifuge tube.
8.2.9 Repeat steps 8.2.1 – 8.2.8 as needed, depending on the size of the ultrasonic bath and the number of samples.
NOTE 7—Depending on the size of the sonicator, many centrifuge tubes may be immersed in the bath at one time. A custom rack for the centrifuge tubes
may be purchased or constructed to allow for the regular and orderly placement of multiple tubes in the sonicator bath.
8.2.10 Apply ultrasonic energy to the crushed and acidified samples within the immersed centrifuge tubes for at least 30 min.
8.2.11 Remove centrifuge tubes from the bath. Keep tubes in upright position.
E1979 − 21
8.2.12 Remove caps from centrifuge tubes that contain samples that were subjected to ultrasonic agitation, and dilute acidified
extracts to the 50 mL mark with ASTM Type I water.
8.2.13 Re-cap and then shake the tubes for 5 to 10 s, and allow the contents to settle. The samples are now ready for analysis for
lead content.
NOTE 8—The sample solutions may require filtration or centrifugation prior to analysis.
8.3 Settled Dust Wipe Samples:
NOTE 9—This procedure assumes dust wipe samples were collected in accordance with Practice E1728 using wipes that conform to Specification E1792.
8.3.1 Don a pair of gloves.
8.3.2 If not already placed in a labeled 50 mL centrifuge tube, remove the wipe sample from the sample container with a pair of
clean tweezers, and place it in a labeled clean and dry 50 mL centrifuge tube. Shove the wipe to the bottom of the tube with a clean
glass or plastic rod. Rinse the original sample container (if applicable), tweezers and rod with a minimum of dilute (5 %) nitric
acid to ensure quantitative sample transfer; make sure that the rinsate falls into the centrifuge tube. Clean tweezers and rods before
and after use with laboratory wipes.
8.3.3 Using a class A pipet, introduce 15 mL of 25 % HNO to the centrifuge tube containing the wipe sample, and cap the tube.
If needed, add more diluted 25 % HNO in 5 mL aliquots to ensure that the wipe is completely covered by acid extraction solution.
If bubbles are observed inside of the immersed wipe, apply pressure to the wipe with a clean stirring rod in order to force the
bubbles up and out.
8.3.4 Place centrifuge tube (containing wipe sample immersed in dilute acid) upright in the sonicator bath, and ensure that the
water level in the bath is at least 2.5 cm above the liquid level within the tube.
8.3.5 Repeat 8.3.1 – 8.3.4 for successive samples as needed, depending on the size of the ultrasonic bath.
NOTE 10—Depending on the size of the sonicator, many centrifuge tubes may be immersed in the bath at one time. A custom rack for the centrifuge tubes
may be purchased or constructed to allow for the regular and orderly placement of multiple tubes in the sonicator bath.
8.3.6 Apply ultrasonic energy to the acid-immersed wipe sample for at least 20 min.
8.3.7 Turn off the sonicator.
8.3.8 Carefully uncap each centrifuge tube.
8.3.9 Using a clean glass or plastic stirring rod for each sample, push down on each wipe within each centrifuge tube in order to
force bubbles (formed during sonication) up and out.
8.3.10 Recap the tubes.
8.3.11 Apply ultrasonic energy again for a minimum of 20 min.
NOTE 11—Longer extraction periods may be required for wipe samples. Quantitative recoveries from spiked w
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...