Geographic Information — Securing interoperability among heterogeneous city domain information models

Information géographique — Sécuriser l'interopérabilité entre des modèles d'information hétérogènes dans le domaine de la ville

General Information

Status
Not Published
Current Stage
5020 - FDIS ballot initiated: 2 months. Proof sent to secretariat
Start Date
30-Jan-2025
Due Date
30-Jan-2025
Completion Date
30-Jan-2025
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Draft
ISO/DTR 19174 - Geographic Information — Securing interoperability among heterogeneous city domain information models Released:16. 01. 2025
English language
18 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Draft
REDLINE ISO/DTR 19174 - Geographic Information — Securing interoperability among heterogeneous city domain information models Released:16. 01. 2025
English language
18 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


FINAL DRAFT
Technical
Report
ISO/TC 211
Geographic Information —
Secretariat: SIS
Securing interoperability among
Voting begins on:
heterogeneous city domain
2025-01-30
information models
Voting terminates on:
2025-04-24
Information géographique — Sécuriser l'interopérabilité entre
des modèles d'information hétérogènes dans le domaine de la
ville
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT,
WITH THEIR COMMENTS, NOTIFICATION OF ANY
RELEVANT PATENT RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE
AND TO PROVIDE SUPPOR TING DOCUMENTATION.
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL, TECHNO­
ISO/CEN PARALLEL PROCESSING LOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND USER PURPOSES, DRAFT
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE
TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR POTENTIAL
TO BECOME STAN DARDS TO WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE
MADE IN NATIONAL REGULATIONS.
Reference number
FINAL DRAFT
Technical
Report
ISO/TC 211
Geographic Information —
Secretariat: SIS
Securing interoperability among
Voting begins on:
heterogeneous city domain
information models
Voting terminates on:
Information géographique — Sécuriser l'interopérabilité entre
des modèles d'information hétérogènes dans le domaine de la ville
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT,
WITH THEIR COMMENTS, NOTIFICATION OF ANY
RELEVANT PATENT RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE
AND TO PROVIDE SUPPOR TING DOCUMENTATION.
© ISO 2025
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL, TECHNO­
ISO/CEN PARALLEL PROCESSING
LOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND USER PURPOSES, DRAFT
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR POTENTIAL
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
TO BECOME STAN DARDS TO WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE
MADE IN NATIONAL REGULATIONS.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland Reference number
ii
Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
3.1 Terms and definitions .1
3.2 Abbreviated terms .3
4 Interoperability issues for city domain information models . 4
4.1 Overview .4
4.2 Smart city standards and standardization activities .4
4.3 Geospatial standards and standardization activities .6
4.4 Data management and IoT standards and standardization activities .6
4.5 Review of standards and standardization activities.7
5 Registers and registries for SDI interoperability . 9
5.1 System interoperability .9
5.2 Semantic interoperability .10
5.3 Registry interoperability .10
5.4 City domain model registration .11
6 Use case development . .12
6.1 Registration and mapping use case . 12
7 Technical requirements . 16
8 Recommendation.16
9 Conclusion . 17
Bibliography .18

iii
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee
has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations,
governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely
with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the different types
of ISO document should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
ISO draws attention to the possibility that the implementation of this document may involve the use of (a)
patent(s). ISO takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of any claimed patent
rights in respect thereof. As of the date of publication of this document, ISO had not received notice of (a)
patent(s) which may be required to implement this document. However, implementers are cautioned that
this may not represent the latest information, which may be obtained from the patent database available at
www.iso.org/patents. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions
related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the World Trade
Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 211, Geographic information, in collaboration
with the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) Technical Committee CEN/TC 287, Geographic
Information, in accordance with the Agreement on technical cooperation between ISO and CEN (Vienna
Agreement).
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.

iv
Introduction
Local governments are actively implementing various smart city services. The heterogeneity of private
and public data generated from the smart city services is one of the major concerns standard development
organizations (SDOs) are actively proceeding to solve for interoperability. Information modelling fields are
moving towards integrated geospatial information environments, such as digital twins, cyber-physical
systems and the meta-verse. These trends have produced new needs for standards in both private and
public sectors that enable effective information sharing in terms of the geospatial context for smart city
services. Building efficient and effective interconnectedness and sharing information between silo data
models across domain fields and cities is one of the major concerns to make seamless smart city services
operational.
v
FINAL DRAFT Technical Report ISO/DTR 19174:2025(en)
Geographic Information — Securing interoperability among
heterogeneous city domain information models
1 Scope
This document analyses a feasible way to accommodate interoperability elements for the data component
of a spatial data infrastructure (SDI) and extend the meta model framework for interoperability (MFI) in
securing interoperability among heterogeneous domain information models under the smart city context.
This document:
a) outlines the interoperability issues for city domain information models;
b) reviews relevant standards and best practices and examines methodologies or solutions to tackle the
interoperability issues;
c) supposes a use case and provides an example to secure interoperability among different domain
information models using model registry;
d) specifies technical requirements in concern about how to apply the interoperability elements of the
meta model framework to support the interoperability of smart city services;
e) highlights the standardization items to be developed to secure interoperability.
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1 Terms and definitions
3.1.1
information model
graphical and textual representation of entities and the relationships between them
Note 1 to entry: May also be known as a data model (3.1.5), a conceptual data model, a logical data model, an entity
relationship model, an object class diagram or a database definition.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2023, 3.17]
3.1.2
interoperability
capability to communicate, execute programs, or transfer data among various functional units in a manner
that requires the user to have little or no knowledge of the unique characteristics of those units

3.1.3
metadata
information about a resource
[SOURCE: ISO 19115-1:2014, 4.10]
3.1.4
metamodel
model (3.1.5) that explains a set of related models, by defining the language for expressing such models
3.1.5
model
representation of some aspect of a domain of interest using a normative modelling facility and model
constructs
Note 1 to entry: Models can be used to express a set of information requirements, processes, services, roles, goals or
some other aspect of a domain of interest.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2023, 3.1]
3.1.6
model registry
information system for registering models (3.1.5)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2023, 3.10]
3.1.7
model repository
repository (3.1.8) where models (3.1.5) are stored
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2023, 3.11]
3.1.8
repository
place where, or receptacle in which, things are or may be stored
Note 1 to entry: In meta model framework for interoperability (MFI) and metadata registry (MDR), a repository is
recognized as a database that stores actual instances that conform to a particular metamodel (3.1.4) or a particular set
of metadata (3.1.3).
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2023 3.13 — "things are or can be stored" has been revised to "things are or may
be stored," "MDR" has been added and "information system" is revised to "database".]
3.1.9
registry summary
RS
metadata (3.1.3) which refers to an individual registry system o
...


ISO/TC 211
ISO/CD TR 19174(en)
Secretariat: SIS
Geographic Information — Securing interoperability among
heterogeneous city domain information models
Information géographique — Sécuriser l'interopérabilité entre des modèles d'information hétérogènes dans le
domaine de la ville
ISO/CD TRDTR 19174:2024(:(en)
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication
may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,
or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO
at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: + 41 22 749 01 11
E-mail: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii
ISO/CD TRDTR 19174:2024(:(en)
Contents
Foreword . iv
Introduction . v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
3.1 Terms and definitions . 1
3.2 Abbreviated terms . 3
4 Interoperability issues for city domain information models . 4
4.1 Overview . 4
4.2 Smart city standards and standardization activities . 4
4.3 Geospatial standards and standardization activities . 7
4.4 Data management and IoT standards and standardization activities . 7
4.5 Review of standards and standardization activities . 8
5 Registers and registries for SDI interoperability . 12
5.1 System interoperability . 12
5.2 Semantic interoperability . 14
5.3 Registry interoperability . 15
5.4 City domain model registration . 16
6 Use case development . 17
6.1 Registration and mapping use case . 17
7 Technical requirements . 24
8 Recommendation . 25
9 Conclusion . 26
Bibliography . 27

iii
ISO/CD TRDTR 19174:2024(:(en)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the different types of
ISO documentsdocument should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules
of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Field Code Changed
Attention is drawnISO draws attention to the possibility that some of the elementsimplementation of this
document may beinvolve the subjectuse of (a) patent(s). ISO takes no position concerning the evidence,
validity or applicability of any claimed patent rights in respect thereof. As of the date of publication of this
document, ISO had not received notice of (a) patent(s) which may be required to implement this document.
However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information, which may be
obtained from the patent database available at www.iso.org/patents. ISO shall not be held responsible for
identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of any patent rights identified during the development of the
document will be in the Introduction and/or on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see ).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation onof the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions
related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the World Trade
Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)), see the following URL:
www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
Field Code Changed
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 211, Geographic information., in collaboration
with the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) Technical Committee CEN/TC 287, Geographic
Information, in accordance with the Agreement on technical cooperation between ISO and CEN (Vienna
Agreement).
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.
iv
ISO/CD TRDTR 19174:2024(:(en)
Introduction
Local governments are actively implementing various smart city services. The heterogeneity of private and
public data generated from the smart city services is one of the major concerns standard development
organizations (SDOs(Standard Development Organizations) are actively underwayproceeding to solve for
interoperability. Information modelling fields are moving towards integrated geospatial information
environments, such as digital twins, cyber-physical systems, and the meta-verse. These trends have produced
new needs for standards in both private and public sectors that enable effective information sharing in terms
of the geospatial context for smart city services. Building efficient and effective interconnectedness and
sharing information between silo data models across domain fields and cities is one of the major concerns to
make seamless smart city services operational.
The objective of this document is to analyse a feasible way to accommodate interoperability elements for the
data component of an SDI and extend the meta model framework for interoperability (MFI) in securing
interoperability among heterogeneous domain information models under smart city context.
For the feasibility analysis, this document
a) defines the interoperability issues for city domain information models;
b) reviews relevant standards and best practices and examines methodologies or solutions to tackle the
interoperability issues;
c) suppose use case for interoperable domain information models under smart city context;
d) defines technical requirements in concern about how to apply the interoperability elements of the meta
model framework to support the interoperability of smart city services;
e) recommends and suggest the standardization items to be proceeded to secure more interoperability.

v
ISO/CD TRDTR 19174:2024(:(en)
Geographic Information — Securing interoperability among
heterogeneous city domain information models
1 Scope
This document analyses a feasible way to accommodate interoperability elements for the data
componentscomponent of a spatial data infrastructure (SDI) and extend the meta model framework for
interoperability (MFI) in securing interoperability among heterogeneous domain information models under
the smart city service context.
This document:
a) definesoutlines the interoperability issues for city domain information models;
b) reviews relevant standards and best practices and examines methodologies or solutions to tackle the
interoperability issues;
c) supposesupposes a use case and provideprovides an example to secure interoperability among different
domain information models using model registry;
d) definesspecifies technical requirements in concern about how to apply the interoperability elements of
the meta model framework to support the interoperability of smart city services;
e) recommends and suggesthighlights the standardization items to be proceededdeveloped to secure
interoperability.
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminologicalterminology databases for use in standardization at the following
addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at httphttps://www.iso.org/obp
Field Code Changed
— IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
3.1 Terms and definitions
3.1.1
information model
graphical and textual representation of entities and the relationships between them
Note 1 to entry: May also be known as a data model (3.1.5,), a conceptual data model, a logical data model, an entity
relationship model, an object class diagram or a database definition.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2015 4.1.52023, 3.17]
ISO/CD TRDTR 19174:2024(:(en)
3.1.2
interoperability
capability to communicate, execute programs, or transfer data among various functional units in a manner
that requires the user to have little or no knowledge of the unique characteristics of those units
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 2382-1:1993]
3.1.3
metadata
information about a resource
[SOURCE: ISO 19115-1:2014, 4.10]
3.1.4
metamodel
model (3.1.5) that explains a set of related models, by defining the language for expressing such models
[SOURCE: ISO 14813-5:2010 B.1.84]
3.1.5
model
representation of some aspect of a domain of interest using a normative modelling facility andmodeland
model constructs
Note 1 to entry: modelsModels can be used to express a set of information requirements, processes, services, roles, goals
or someothersome other aspect of a domain of interest.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2015, 42023, 3.1.12]
3.1.6
model information
representation of some aspect of a domain of interest using a normative modelling facility and model
constructs
Note 1 to entry: In MFI, the model information about a model will be registered using instances of Registered_Item as
specified in ISO/IEC 11179-3
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2015 4.1.15]
3.1.73.1.6
model registry
registry whereinformation system for registering models (3.1.5are registered)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2015 4.1.162023, 3.10]
3.1.83.1.7
model repository
repository (3.1.8) where models (3.1.5) are stored
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2015, 4.1.172023, 3.11]
3.1.93.1.8
repository
place where, or receptacle in which, things are or may be stored
ISO/CD TRDTR 19174:2024(:(en)
Note 1 to entry: In meta model framework for interoperability (MFI) and metadata registry (MDR,), a repository is
recognized as a database that stores actual instances tothat conform to aparticulara particular metamodel (3.1.4) or a
particular set of metadata (3.1.3.).
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2015 4.1.25]
3.1.10
registry summary(RS)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-1:2023 3.13 — "things are or can be stored" has been revised to "things are or may
be stored," "MDR" has been added and "information system" is revised to "database".]
3.1.9
registry summary is
RS
metadata (3.1.3) which refers to an individual registry system or an aggregate of registry systems
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-6:2015, 4.1.56 — "(RS)" has been added]
3.1.113.1.10
registry of registries
(RoR)
registry that stores registry summary (3.1.9Registry Summary) data showing an individual registry system
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19763-6:2015, 4.1.5]
3.2 Abbreviated terms
API Application Programming Interfaceapplication programming interface
BIM Building Information Modelingbuilding information modeling
CaLAThe Cadastre and Land Administration Thesauruscadastre and land administration thesaurus
CRS
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.