Framework for implementing environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles

This document provides a high-level framework and set of principles to give guidance on how to implement and embed environmental, social and governance (ESG) within the culture of an organization to support management of ESG performance, measurement and reporting, enabling consistency, comparability and reliability of ESG reporting and practices globally. This document provides guidance that identifies high-level principles and thinking that cover all elements of ESG, thus providing integrated solutions, with measurable key performance indicators (KPIs) to support the evaluation of maturity levels within the organization. This document is applicable to a wide range of organizations of all types and sizes across the globe including SMEs and organizations in low- and middle-income countries. It is complementary and interoperable with existing voluntary and regulatory reporting frameworks to facilitate global harmonization and alignment on ESG principles and approaches and is not in itself a reporting framework.

Titre manque

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
13-Nov-2024
Technical Committee
Current Stage
6060 - International Standard published
Start Date
14-Nov-2024
Due Date
14-Nov-2024
Completion Date
14-Nov-2024
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Draft
IWA 48:2024 - Framework for implementing environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles Released:10/29/2024
English language
55 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Draft
REDLINE IWA 48:2024 - Framework for implementing environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles Released:10/29/2024
English language
55 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


International
Workshop
Agreement
IWA 48
First edition
Framework for implementing
2024-11
environmental, social and
governance (ESG) principles
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
Reference number
© ISO 2024
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
ii
Contents Page
Foreword .v
Introduction .vi
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Principles and practices in ESG . 2
4.1 Overarching principles .2
4.2 Risks and opportunities .2
4.2.1 General .2
4.2.2 Principles and framework.4
4.2.3 Risk- and opportunity-based approaches .6
4.2.4 Further information .6
4.3 Accountability and transparency .6
4.4 Identification and engagement of interested parties .7
4.4.1 General .7
4.4.2 Identification of interested parties .7
4.4.3 Engagement with interested parties .7
4.5 Materiality .9
4.5.1 General .9
4.5.2 Key concepts of materiality .9
4.5.3 Actionable approaches to material impacts.10
4.5.4 ESG materiality assessment .11
4.5.5 Further information .11
4.6 KPI measurement framework for ESG standardized reporting .11
4.6.1 General .11
4.6.2 Rationale . 12
4.6.3 Guidance notes on KPIs . 12
4.7 Further information . 13
5 Environmental .13
5.1 General . 13
5.2 Environmental framework .14
5.2.1 Framework .14
5.2.2 Environmental data, records and considerations . 15
5.3 Examples of actions in relation to environmental considerations. 15
5.4 Environmental KPIs .17
5.4.1 General .17
5.4.2 First priority.17
5.4.3 Second priority .18
5.5 Further information .18
6 Social .18
6.1 General .18
6.2 Social framework .19
6.3 Examples of actions that can be undertaken in relation to social dimensions . 20
6.4 Social KPIs . 22
6.4.1 General . 22
6.4.2 First priority. 23
6.4.3 Second priority . 23
6.5 Further information . 23
7 Governance .24
7.1 General .24
7.2 Governance framework .24
7.3 Examples of actions based on governance aspects. 26
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
iii
7.4 Leadership .27
7.4.1 General .27
7.4.2 Constructive challenge structure . 28
7.5 Organizational culture and commitment . 29
7.6 ESG communications . 30
7.6.1 General . 30
7.6.2 Actions .31
7.6.3 Types of communication.31
7.6.4 Vulnerable groups .32
7.7 Governance KPIs . 33
7.7.1 General . 33
7.7.2 First priority. 33
7.7.3 Second priority . 33
7.8 Further information . 33
8 Compliance and conformity .34
8.1 General . 34
8.2 Difference between compliance and conformity .
...


PRF IWA 48
ISO/WS ESG
Date:  2024-11
CD IWA 48(en)
Secretariat:  BSI
Date: 2024-10-29
Framework for implementing environmental, social and governance
(ESG) principles
CDPRF IWA 48:2024(en)
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication
may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,
or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO
at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: + 41 22 749 01 11
E-mail: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii
CDPRF IWA 48:2024(en)
Contents
Foreword . iv
Introduction . v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Principles and practices in ESG. 2
4.1 Overarching principles . 2
4.2 Risks and opportunities . 2
4.3 Accountability and transparency . 7
4.4 Identification and engagement of interested parties . 7
4.5 Materiality . 10
4.6 KPI measurement framework for ESG standardized reporting . 13
4.7 Further information . 15
5 Environmental . 15
5.1 General . 15
5.2 Environmental framework . 16
5.3 Examples of actions in relation to environmental considerations . 18
5.4 Environmental KPIs . 19
5.5 Further information . 20
6 Social . 21
6.1 General . 21
6.2 Social framework . 22
6.3 Examples of actions that can be undertaken in relation to social dimensions . 23
6.4 Social KPIs . 26
6.5 Further information . 27
7 Governance . 28
7.1 General . 28
7.2 Governance framework . 28
7.3 Examples of actions based on governance aspects . 30
7.4 Leadership . 32
7.5 Organizational culture and commitment . 34
7.6 ESG communications . 35
7.7 Governance KPIs . 38
7.8 Further information . 39
8 Compliance and conformity . 39
8.1 General . 39
8.2 Difference between compliance and conformity . 40
8.3 Conformity assessment . 40
9 Reporting . 42
9.1 General . 42
9.2 Reporting principles and quality . 43
9.9 Assurance . 49
9.10 ESG and reporting schemes/directives . 50
9.11 Further information . 51
10 Continual improvement . 51
Annex A (informative) Assurance and conformity assessment . 53
Annex B (informative) Workshop contributors . 58
Bibliography . 59

iii
CDPRF IWA 48:2024(en)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the different types of
ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
ISO draws attention to the possibility that the implementation of this document may involve the use of (a)
patent(s). ISO takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of any claimed patent rights
in respect thereof. As of the date of publication of this document, ISO had not received notice of (a) patent(s)
which may be required to implement this document. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not
represent the latest information, which may be obtained from the patent database available at
www.iso.org/patents. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions
related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the World Trade
Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
International Workshop Agreement IWA 48 was approved at a workshopvirtual workshops hosted jointly by
the Brazilian Technical Standards Association (ABNT, ), the British Standards Institution (BSI) and the
Standards Council of Canada (SCC, held via Zoom), in October 2024.
In order to respond to urgent market requirements, International Workshop Agreements are prepared
through a workshop mechanism outside of ISO committee structures, following a procedure that ensures the
broadest range of relevant interested parties worldwide have the opportunity to participate, and are approved
by consensus amongst the individual participants in the workshops. If there is an existing ISO committee
whose scope covers the topic, the published International Workshop Agreement is automatically allocated to
this committee for maintenance. An International Workshop Agreement is reviewed three years after its
publication and can be further processed to become a Publicly Available Specification, a Technical
Specification or an International Standard, according to the market requirement. An International Workshop
Agreement can exist for a maximum of six years, following which it is either withdrawn or converted into
another ISO document.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.

iv
CDPRF IWA 48:2024(en)
Introduction
0.1 What is ESG?
Environmental, Socialsocial and Governancegovernance (ESG) – is a strategic and operational framework that
aims to assist organizations, of any size and type, to implement and report on their activities, products,
services and commitment to support the achievement of sustainable development, social justice and good
governance. Adopting ESG brings a clearer focus on an organization’s impacts on the environment and the
society, including contribution to the delivery of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals
[1]
(SDGs), alongside an evaluation of) , as well as evaluating the impacts of the environment and society on the
organization.
ESG is distinctive for organizations partly because it guides decision-makers attention more on the impacts
and accountability of organizations with respect to communities, the environment and everyday lives.
Regulatory bodies, policy makers, and investors are particularly interested in ESG for this precise reason and
because, everyone has the potential to be an interested party in the outcomes of ESG activities.
Being open, honest, and factual about all aspects of the organization is a positive ESG trait which underpins
good governance, the ‘G’ of ESG, that takes full account of the direct and indirect, individual and collective ‘end-
outcomes’outcomes of organizations’ activities, products and services, and has regard for external influences,
regardless of their source, type, size, or jurisdiction, including their supply chains and customers.
ESG involves accurate and regular reporting of financial and non-financial material impacts. But ESG is not
just about reporting. The focus of this document is deliberately on the implementing and embedding of ESG
practices and values throughout an organization’s culture and activities.
EXAMPLE 1 ESG can include:
— “E”:Environmental (E): climate c
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.