Photography - Electronic still picture imaging - Resolution and spatial frequency responses

ISO 12233:2017 specifies methods for measuring the resolution and the SFR of electronic still-picture cameras. It is applicable to the measurement of both monochrome and colour cameras which output digital data or analogue video signals.

Photographie — Imagerie des prises de vues électroniques — Résolution et réponses en fréquence spatiale

Fotografija - Elektronsko prikazovanje mirujočih slik - Resolucija (ločljivost) in frekvenčni odzivi v prostoru

Ta dokument določa metode za merjenje ločljivosti in frekvenčnega odziva v prostoru (SFR) elektronskih fotoaparatov
za mirujoče slike. Uporablja se za merjenje monokromatskih in barvnih fotoaparatov, ki oddajajo
digitalne podatke ali analogne video signale.

General Information

Status
Withdrawn
Publication Date
09-Jan-2017
Current Stage
9599 - Withdrawal of International Standard
Start Date
17-Feb-2023
Completion Date
13-Dec-2025

Relations

Standard
ISO 12233:2017 - Photography — Electronic still picture imaging — Resolution and spatial frequency responses Released:1/10/2017
English language
49 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
ISO 12233:2017 - BARVE
English language
57 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 12233:2017 is a standard published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Its full title is "Photography - Electronic still picture imaging - Resolution and spatial frequency responses". This standard covers: ISO 12233:2017 specifies methods for measuring the resolution and the SFR of electronic still-picture cameras. It is applicable to the measurement of both monochrome and colour cameras which output digital data or analogue video signals.

ISO 12233:2017 specifies methods for measuring the resolution and the SFR of electronic still-picture cameras. It is applicable to the measurement of both monochrome and colour cameras which output digital data or analogue video signals.

ISO 12233:2017 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 37.040.10 - Photographic equipment. Projectors. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ISO 12233:2017 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ISO 12233:2023, ISO 12233:2014. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

You can purchase ISO 12233:2017 directly from iTeh Standards. The document is available in PDF format and is delivered instantly after payment. Add the standard to your cart and complete the secure checkout process. iTeh Standards is an authorized distributor of ISO standards.

Standards Content (Sample)


INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 12233
Third edition
2017-01
Photography — Electronic still picture
imaging — Resolution and spatial
frequency responses
Photographie — Imagerie des prises de vues électroniques —
Résolution et réponses en fréquence spatiale
Reference number
©
ISO 2017
© ISO 2017, Published in Switzerland
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland
Tel. +41 22 749 01 11
Fax +41 22 749 09 47
copyright@iso.org
www.iso.org
ii © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

Contents Page
Foreword .v
Introduction .vi
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Test conditions . 5
4.1 Test chart illumination . 5
4.2 Camera framing and lens focal length setting . 5
4.3 Camera focusing . 6
4.4 Camera settings . 6
4.5 White balance. 6
4.6 Luminance and colour measurements . 6
4.7 Gamma correction . 6
5 Visual resolution measurement . 7
5.1 General . 7
5.2 Test chart. 7
5.2.1 General. 7
5.2.2 Material . 7
5.2.3 Size . 7
5.2.4 Test patterns . 7
5.2.5 Test pattern modulation . 8
5.2.6 Positional tolerance . 8
5.3 Rules of judgement for visual observation . 8
5.3.1 Rules of judgement . 8
5.3.2 An example of a correct visual judgement . 9
6 Edge-based spatial frequency response (e-SFR) . 9
6.1 General . 9
6.2 Methodology .10
6.2.1 Selection of the edge region of interest (ROI) . .10
6.2.2 Transformation into effective exposure .10
6.2.3 Estimation of the location of the edge .10
6.2.4 Formation of a super-sampled line spread function array .12
6.2.5 Computation of the e-SFR .13
7 Sine-based spatial frequency response (s-SFR) measurement .13
8 Presentation of results .14
8.1 General .14
8.2 Resolution .14
8.2.1 General.14
8.2.2 Basic presentation .14
8.2.3 Representative presentation .14
8.3 Spatial frequency response (SFR) .15
8.3.1 General.15
8.3.2 Spatial frequency response . .15
8.3.3 Report of resolution value derived from the s-SFR .16
Annex A (informative) CIPA resolution test chart .17
Annex B (informative) Visual resolution measurement software .23
Annex C (informative) Low contrast edge SFR test chart with OECF patches .28
Annex D (normative) Edge spatial frequency response (e-SFR) algorithm .30
Annex E (normative) Sine wave star test chart .33
Annex F (normative) Sine wave spatial frequency response (s-SFR) analysis algorithm .35
Annex G (informative) Colour-filtered resolution measurements .39
Annex H (informative) Units and summary metrics .41
Annex I (informative) Original test chart defined in ISO 12233:2000 .44
Bibliography .48
iv © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www .iso .org/ directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www .iso .org/ patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity assessment,
as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the
Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: www . i so .org/ iso/ foreword .html.
The committee responsible for this document is ISO/TC 42, Photography.
This third edition cancels and replaces the second edition (ISO 12233:2014), of which it constitutes a
minor revision with changes in Annex D.
Introduction
Purpose
The spatial resolution capability is an important attribute of an electronic still-picture camera.
Resolution measurement standards allow users to compare and verify spatial resolution measurements.
This document defines terminology, test charts, and test methods for performing resolution
measurements for analogue and digital electronic still-picture cameras.
Technical background
For consumer digital cameras, the term resolution is often incorrectly interpreted as the number of
addressable photoelements. While there are existing protocols for determining camera pixel counts,
these are not to be confused with the interpretation of resolution as addressed in this document.
Qualitatively, resolution is the ability of a camera to optically capture finely spaced detail, and is usually
reported as a single valued metric. Spatial frequency response (SFR) is a multi-valued metric that
measures contrast loss as a function of spatial frequency. Generally, contrast decreases as a function of
spatial frequency to a level where detail is no longer visually resolved. This limiting frequency value is
the resolution of the camera. A camera’s resolution and its SFR are determined by a number of factors.
These include, but are not limited to, the performance of the camera lens, the number of addressable
photoelements in the optical imaging device, and the electrical circuits in the camera, which can include
image compression and gamma correction functions.
While resolution and SFR are related metrics, their difference lies in their comprehensiveness and utility.
As articulated in this document, resolution is a single frequency parameter that indicates whether the
output signal contains a minimum threshold of detail information for visual detection. In other words,
resolution is the highest spatial frequency that a candidate camera can usefully capture under cited
conditions. It can be very valuable for rapid manufacturing testing, quality control monitoring, or for
providing a simple metric that can be easily understood by end users. The algorithm used to determine
resolution has been tested with visual experiments using human observers and correlates well with
their estimation of high frequency detail loss.
SFR is a numerical description of how contrast is changed by a camera as a function of the spatial
frequencies that describe the contrast. It is very beneficial for engineering, diagnostic, and image
evaluation purposes and serves as an umbrella function from which such metrics as sharpness and
acutance are derived. Often, practitioners will select the spatial frequency associated with a specified
SFR level as a modified non-visual resolution value.
In a departure from the first edition of this document, two SFR measurements are described.
Additionally, the first SFR metrology method, edge-based spatial frequency response, is identical to
that described in the first edition, except that a lower contrast edge is used for the test chart. Regions
of interest (ROI) near slanted vertical and horizontal edges are digitized and used to compute the SFR
levels. The use of a slanted edge allows the edge gradient to be measured at many phases relative to the
image sensor photoelements and to yield a phase-averaged SFR response.
A second sine wave-based SFR metrology technique is introduced in the second edition. Using a sine
wave modulated target in a polar format (e.g. Siemens star), it is intended to provide an SFR response
that is more resilient to ill-behaved spatial frequency signatures introduced by the image content driven
processing of consumer digital cameras. In this sense, it is intended to enable easier interpretation of
SFR levels from such camera sources. Comparing the results of the edge-based SFR and the sine-based
SFR might indicate the extent to which nonlinear processing is used.
The first step in determining visual resolution or SFR is to capture an image of a suitable test chart with
the camera under test. The test chart should include features of sufficiently fine detail and frequency
content such as edges, lines, square waves, or sine wave patterns. The test chart defined in this document
has been designed specifically to evaluate electronic still-picture cameras. It has not necessarily been
designed to evaluate other electronic imaging equipment such as input scanners, CRT displays, hard-
copy printers, or electro-photographic copiers, nor individual components of an electronic still-picture
camera, such as the lens.
vi © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

Some of the measurements described in this document are performed using digital analysis techniques.
They are also applicable with the analogue outputs of the camera by digitizing the analogue signals if
there is adequate digitizing equipment.
Methods for measuring SFR and resolution — Selection rationale and guidance
This section is intended to provide more detailed rationale and guidance for the selection of the
different resolution metrology methods presented in this document. While resolution metrology
of analogue optical systems, by way of spatial frequency response, is well established and largely
consistent between methodologies (e.g. sine waves, lines, edges), metrology data for such systems are
normally captured under well-controlled conditions where the required data linearity and spatial
isotropy assumptions hold. Generally, it is not safe to assume these conditions for files from many
digital cameras, even under laboratory capture environments. Exposure and image content dependent
image processing of the digital image file before it is provided as a finished file to the user prevents
this. This processing yields different SFR responses depending on the features in the scene or in the
case of this document, the target. For instance, in-camera edge detection algorithms might specifically
operate on edge features and selectively enhance or blur them based on complex nonlinear decision
rules. Depending on the intent, these algorithms might also be tuned differently for repetitive scene
features such as those found in sine waves or bar pattern targets. Even for constrained camera settings
recommended in this document, these nonlinear operators can yield differing SFR results depending
on the target feature set. Naturally, this causes confusion on which targets to use, either alone or in
combination. Guidelines for selection are offered below.
Edges are common features in naturally occurring scenes. They also tend to act as visual acuity cues by
which image quality is judged and imaging artefacts are manifested. This logic prescribed their use for
SFR metrology in the past and current editions of this document. It is also why edge features are prone
to image processing in many consumer digital cameras: they are visually important. All other imaging
conditions being equal, camera SFRs using different target contrast edge features can be significantly
different, especially with respect to their morphology. This is largely due to nonlinear image processing
operators and would not occur for strictly linear imaging systems. To moderate this behaviour, a lower
contrast slanted edge feature (Figure C.1) was chosen to replace the higher contrast version of the
first edition. This feature choice still allows for acuity-amenable SFR results beyond the half-sampling
frequency and helps prevent nonlinear data clipping that can occur with high contrast target features.
It is also a more reliable rendering of visually important contrast levels in naturally occurring scenes.
Sine wave features have long been the choice for directly calculating SFR of analogue imaging systems
and they are intuitively satisfying. They have been introduced into the second edition based on
experiences from the edge-based approach. Because sine waves transition more slowly than edges,
they are not prone to being identified as edges in embedded camera processors. As such, the ambiguity
that image processing imposes on the SFR can be largely avoided by their use. Alternatively, if the image
processing is influenced by the absence of sharp features, more aggressive processing might be used
by the camera. A sine wave starburst test pattern (Figure 6) is adopted in the second edition. With
the appropriate analysis software, a sine wave-based SFR can be calculated up to the half-sampling
frequency. For the same reasons stated above, the sine wave-based target is also of low contrast and
consistent with that of the edge-based version. An added benefit of the target’s design over other sine
targets is its compactness and bi-directional features.
All experience suggests that there is no single SFR for today’s digital cameras. Even under the strict
capture constraints suggested in this document, the allowable feature sets that most digital cameras
offer prevent such unique characterization. Confusion can be reduced through complete documentation
of the capture conditions and camera setting for which the SFR was calculated. It has been suggested
that comparing edge-based and sine wave-based SFR results under the same capture conditions could
be a good tool in assessing the contribution of spatial image processing in digital cameras.
Finally, at times, a full SFR characterization is simply not required, such as in end of line camera
assembly testing. Alternately, SFR might be an intimidating obstacle to those not trained in its utility.
For those in need of a simple and intuitive space domain approach to resolution using repeating line
patterns, a visual resolution metric is also provided in this third edition of this document.
With such a variety of methods available for measuring resolution, there are bound to be differences
in measured resolution results. To benchmark the likely variations, the committee has published the
results of a pilot study using all of the proposed techniques and how they relate to each other. These
results are provided in Reference [20].
viii © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 12233:2017(E)
Photography — Electronic still picture imaging —
Resolution and spatial frequency responses
1 Scope
This document specifies methods for measuring the resolution and the SFR of electronic still-picture
cameras. It is applicable to the measurement of both monochrome and colour cameras which output
digital data or analogue video signals.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 14524, Photography — Electronic still-picture cameras — Methods for measuring opto-electronic
conversion functions (OECFs)
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— IEC Electropedia: available at http:// www .electropedia .org/
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at http:// www .iso .org/ obp
3.1
addressable photoelements
number of active photoelements in an image sensor (3.11)
Note 1 to entry: This equals the product of the number of active photoelement lines and the number of active
photoelements per line.
3.2
aliasing
output image artefacts that occur in a sampled imaging system (3.23) due to insufficient sampling
Note 1 to entry: These artefacts usually manifest themselves as moiré patterns in repetitive image features or as
jagged stair-stepping at edge transitions.
3.3
cycles per millimetre
cy/mm
spatial frequency unit defined as the number of spatial periods per millimetre
3.4
edge spread function
ESF
normalized spatial signal distribution in the linearized (3.15) output of an imaging system resulting
from imaging a theoretical infinitely sharp edge
3.5
effectively spectrally neutral
having spectral characteristics which result in a specific imaging system producing the same output as
for a spectrally neutral (3.25) object
3.6
electronic still-picture camera
camera incorporating an image sensor (3.11) that outputs an analogue or digital signal representing a
still picture
Note 1 to entry: This camera may also record or store an analogue or digital signal representing a still picture on
a removable media, such as a memory card or magnetic disc.
3.7
gamma correction
signal processing operation that changes the relative signal levels
Note 1 to entry: Gamma correction is performed, in part, to correct for the nonlinear light output versus signal
input characteristics of the display. The relationship between the light input level and the output signal level,
called the camera opto-electronic conversion function (OECF), provides the gamma correction curve shape for
an image capture device.
Note 2 to entry: The gamma correction is usually an algorithm, lookup table, or circuit which operates separately
on each colour component of an image.
3.8
horizontal resolution
resolution (3.22) value measured in the longer image dimension, corresponding to the horizontal
direction for a “landscape” image orientation, typically using a vertical or near vertical oriented test-
chart feature
3.9
image aspect ratio
ratio of the image width to the image height
3.10
image compression
process that alters the way digital image data are encoded to reduce the size of an image file
3.11
image sensor
electronic device that converts incident electromagnetic radiation into an electronic signal
EXAMPLE Charge coupled device (CCD) array, complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) array.
3.12
line pairs per millimetre
lp/mm
spatial frequency unit defined as the number of equal width black and white line pairs per millimetre
3.13
line spread function
LSF
normalized spatial signal distribution in the linearized (3.15) output of an imaging system resulting
from imaging a theoretical infinitely thin line
2 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

3.14
line widths per picture height
LW/PH
spatial frequency unit for specifying the width of a feature on a test chart (3.26) relative to the height of
the active area of the chart
Note 1 to entry: The value in LW/PH indicates the total number of lines of the same width which can be placed
edge to edge within the height of a test target or within the vertical field of view of a camera.
Note 2 to entry: This unit is used whatever the orientation of the “feature” (e.g. line). Specifically, it applies to
horizontal, vertical, and diagonal lines.
EXAMPLE If the height of the active area of the chart equals 20 cm, a black line of 1 000 LW/PH has a width
equal to 20/1 000 cm.
3.15
linearized
digital signal conversion performed to invert the camera opto-electronic conversion function (OECF) to
focal plane exposure or scene luminance
3.16
lines per millimetre
lines/mm
spatial frequency unit defined as the number of equal width black and white lines per millimetre
Note 1 to entry: One line pair per millimetre (lp/mm) is equal to 2 lines/mm.
3.17
modulation
normalized amplitude of signal levels
Note 1 to entry: This is the difference between the minimum and maximum signal levels divided by the average
signal level.
3.18
modulation transfer function
MTF
modulus of the optical transfer function (3.20)
Note 1 to entry: For the MTF to have significance, it is necessary that the imaging system be operating in an
isoplanatic region and in its linear range. Because most electronic still-picture cameras (3.6) provide spatial
colour sampling and nonlinear processing, a meaningful MTF of the camera can only be approximated through
the SFR. See ISO 15529:2010.
3.19
normalized spatial frequency
spatial frequency unit for specifying resolution characteristics of an imaging system in terms of cycles
per pixel rather than in cycles/millimetre or any other unit of length
3.20
optical transfer function
OTF
two-dimensional Fourier transform of the imaging system’s point spread function (3.21)
Note 1 to entry: For the OTF to have significance, it is necessary that the imaging system be operating in an
isoplanatic region and in its linear range. The OTF is a complex function whose modulus has unity value at
zero spatial frequency (see ISO 9334). Because most electronic still-picture cameras (3.6) provide spatial colour
sampling and nonlinear processing, a meaningful OTF of the camera can only be approximated through the SFR.
3.21
point spread function
PSF
normalized spatial signal distribution in the linearized (3.15) output of an imaging system resulting
from imaging a theoretical infinitely small point source
3.22
resolution
measure of the ability of a camera system, or a component of a camera system, to depict picture detail
3.23
sampled imaging system
imaging system or device which generates an image signal by sampling an image at an array of discrete
points, or along a set of discrete lines, rather than a continuum of points
Note 1 to entry: The sampling at each point is done using a finite-size sampling aperture or area.
3.24
spatial frequency response
SFR
relative amplitude response of an imaging system as a function of input spatial frequency
Note 1 to entry: The SFR is normally represented by a curve of the output response to an input sinusoidal spatial
luminance distribution of unit amplitude, over a range of spatial frequencies. The SFR is divided by its value at
the spatial frequency of 0 as normalization to yield a value of 1,0 at a spatial frequency of 0.
3.24.1
edge-based spatial frequency response
e-SFR
measured amplitude response of an imaging system to a slanted-edge input
Note 1 to entry: Measurement of e-SFR is as defined in Clause 6.
3.24.2
sine wave-based spatial frequency response
s-SFR
measured amplitude response of an imaging system to a range of sine wave inputs
Note 1 to entry: Measurement of s-SFR is as defined in Clause 7.
3.25
spectrally neutral
exhibiting reflective or transmissive characteristics which are constant over the wavelength range of
interest
3.26
test chart
arrangement of test patterns (3.27) designed to test particular aspects of an imaging system
3.27
test pattern
specified arrangement of spectral reflectance or transmittance characteristics used in measuring an
image quality attribute
3.27.1
bi-tonal pattern
pattern that is spectrally neutral (3.25) or effectively spectrally neutral (3.5), and consists exclusively of
two reflectance or transmittance values in a prescribed spatial arrangement
Note 1 to entry: Bi-tonal patterns are typically used to measure resolution (3.22) by visual resolution method.
4 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

3.27.2
hyperbolic wedge test pattern
bi-tonal pattern (3.27.1) that varies continuously and linearly with spatial frequency
Note 1 to entry: A bi-tonal hyperbolic wedge test pattern is used to measure resolution (3.22) by the visual
resolution method in this document.
3.28
vertical resolution
resolution (3.22) value measured in the shorter image dimension, corresponding to the vertical
direction for a “landscape” image orientation, typically using a horizontal or near horizontal oriented
test-chart feature
3.29
visual resolution
spatial frequency at which all of the individual black and white lines of a test pattern frequency can no
longer be distinguished by a human observer
Note 1 to entry: This presumes the features are reproduced on a display or print.
4 Test conditions
4.1 Test chart illumination
The luminance of the test chart shall be sufficient to provide an acceptable camera output signal level.
The test chart shall be uniformly illuminated as shown in Figure 1, so that the illuminance at the
chart is within ±10 % of the illuminance in the centre of the chart at any position within the chart.
The illumination sources should be baffled to prevent direct illumination of the camera lens by the
illumination sources. The area surrounding the test chart should be of low reflectance to minimize
flare light. The chart should be shielded from any reflected light. The illuminated test chart shall be
effectively spectrally neutral within the visible wavelengths.
Figure 1 — Test chart illumination method
4.2 Camera framing and lens focal length setting
The camera shall be positioned to properly frame the test target. The vertical framing arrows are used
to adjust the magnification and the horizontal arrows are used to centre the target horizontally. The
tips of the centre vertical black framing arrows should be fully visible and the tips of the centre white
framing arrows should not be visible. The target shall be oriented so that the horizontal edge of the
chart is approximately parallel to the horizontal camera frame line. The approximate distance between
the camera and the test chart should be reported along with the measurement results.
4.3 Camera focusing
The camera focus should be set either by using the camera autofocusing system, or by performing a
series of image captures at varying focus settings, and selecting the focus setting that provides the
highest average modulation level at a spatial frequency approximately 1/4 the camera Nyquist
frequency. (In the case of a colour camera, the Nyquist frequency is of the conceptual monochrome
image sensor without colour filter array). Auto focus accuracy is often limited and this limitation might
have an impact on the results.
4.4 Camera settings
The camera lens aperture (if adjustable) and the exposure time should be adjusted to provide a near
maximum signal level from the white test target areas. The settings shall not result in signal clipping in
either the white or black areas of the test chart, or regions of edge transitions.
Electronic still-picture cameras might include image compression, to reduce the size of the image files
and allow more images to be stored. The use of image compression can significantly affect resolution
measurements. Some cameras have switches that allow the camera to operate in various compression
or resolution modes. The values of all camera settings that might affect the results of the measurement,
including lens focal length, aperture and image quality (i.e. recording pixel number or compression)
mode (if adjustable), shall be reported along with the measurement results.
Multiple SFR measurements can be reported for different camera settings, including a setting that uses
the maximum lens aperture size (minimum f-number) and maximum camera gain.
4.5 White balance
For a colour camera, the camera white balance should be adjusted, if possible, to provide proper white
balance [equal red, green, and blue (RGB) signal levels] for the illumination light source, as specified in
ISO 14524.
4.6 Luminance and colour measurements
Resolution measurements are normally performed on the camera luminance signal. For colour cameras
that do not provide a luminance output signal, a luminance signal should be formed from an appropriate
combination of the colour records, rather than from a single channel such as green. The reader is
referred to ISO 12232 for the luminance signal calculation. Colour-filtered resolution measurements
can be performed as described in Annex G.
4.7 Gamma correction
The signal representing the image from an electronic still-picture camera will probably be a nonlinear
function of the scene luminance values. Since the SFR measurement is defined on a linearized output
signal and such a nonlinear response can affect SFR values, the signal shall be linearized before the
data analysis is performed. Linearization is accomplished by applying the inverse of the camera OECF
to the output signal via a lookup table or appropriate equation. The measurement of the OECF shall be
as specified in ISO 14524, using the standard reflection camera OECF test chart or using an integrated
OECF/resolution chart.
6 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

5 Visual resolution measurement
5.1 General
The visual resolution is the maximum value of the spatial frequency in LW/PH within a test pattern that
is able to be visually distinguished. A black and white hyperbolic wedge is used as the test pattern.
Because of aliasing artefacts in the high frequencies, actual resolution judgements can be ambiguous.
The objective visual resolution method cited herein using a hyperbolic wedge test pattern gives more
stable results by adopting the visual judgement rules described in 5.3 which have been used by a highly
skilled observer.
It can be measured analytically using computer analysis of captured images, as defined in Annex B. The
computer analysis method is intended to correlate with the subjective judgement of visual resolution
made by a skilled observer but is likely to yield a more consistent and objective result compared to
actual visual judgements. However, if there is a discrepancy between the results of the computer
analysis method and the judgement of a human observer, the judgement of the human observer takes
priority.
5.2 Test chart
5.2.1 General
The preferred test chart for measuring the visual resolution is the CIPA resolution chart, which is shown
in Figure 2 and specified in Annex A.
The chart shown in Figure 2 is designed to measure cameras having a resolution of less than
2 500 LW/PH. Nevertheless, it is possible to use the chart to measure the resolution of an electronic still
camera having a resolution greater than 2 500 LW/PH. This is accomplished by adjusting the camera
to target distance, or the focal length of the camera lens, so that the test chart active area fills only a
portion of the vertical image height of the camera. This fraction is then measured in the digital image,
by dividing the number of image lines in the camera image by the number of lines in the active chart
area. The values of all test chart features, in LW/PH, printed on the chart or specified in this document,
are multiplied by this fraction, to obtain their correct values. For example, if the chart fills 1/2 of the
vertical image height of the camera, then the multiplication factor is equal to 2 and a feature labelled as
2 000 LW/PH on the chart corresponds to 4 000 LW/PH using this chart framing.
NOTE Figure 2 includes an improved version of the test chart features originally defined in ISO 12233:2000.
This original test chart defined in ISO 12233:2000 is described in Annex I.
5.2.2 Material
The test chart can be either a transparency that is rear illuminated or a reflection test card that is front
illuminated. A reflection chart shall have an approximately Lambertian base material. A transparency
chart shall be rear illuminated by a diffuse source.
5.2.3 Size
The active height of reflection test charts should be no less than 20 cm. The active height of
transparencies shall be not less than 10 cm.
5.2.4 Test patterns
The test chart shall have bi-tonal patterns and should be spectrally neutral.
NOTE Bi-tonal test charts are easily manufactured and minimize the cost of producing the chart.
5.2.5 Test pattern modulation
For reflective charts, the ratio of the maximum chart reflectance, R , to the minimum chart
max
reflectance, R , for large test pattern areas should be not less than 40:1 and not greater than 80:1,
min
and shall be reported if it is outside this range. For transmissive charts, the ratio of the maximum chart
transmittance, T , to the minimum chart transmittance, T , for a large test pattern should be not
max min
less than 40:1 and not greater than 80:1, and shall be reported if it is outside this range. For a paper
base optical density of 0,10, these minimum and maximum numbers translate to optical densities of 1,7
and 2,0, respectively. Modulation ratios for the finer test chart features, relative to the ratio for large
test pattern areas, should preferably be reported by the chart manufacturer for reference.
5.2.6 Positional tolerance
The position of any test chart feature shall be reproduced with a tolerance of ±1/1 000 picture heights
(equivalent to ±1/10 % of the active test chart height). In addition, the width and duty cycle ratio of
each feature (white or black line) of the wedge pattern shall be reproduced with a tolerance of ±5 % of
the feature width.
Figure 2 — CIPA resolution test chart
5.3 Rules of judgement for visual observation
5.3.1 Rules of judgement
The viewer shall observe the following rules when judging the resolution value. These rules are
intended to achieve correct measurement value in the presence of unavoidable aliasing artefacts.
a) Beginning from the low frequency side, treat a spatial frequency as “Resolved” only when all lower
spatial frequencies are also resolved. The resolution limit is achieved at the line just before the first
occurrence of unresolved line features.
b) Treat a spatial frequency as “Not resolved” when the black and white lines appear to change polarity
or lines are blurred together to produce a reduced number of lines, compared to the number in the
test chart.
8 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

5.3.2 An example of a correct visual judgement
As shown in Figure 3, the boundary between the resolved (Key 1) and not resolved (Key 2) regions is
indicated by a dashed arrow, which corresponds to resolution value to be measured.
Key
1 5 black lines
2 less lines
Figure 3 — Correct application of the wedge feature interpretation
6 Edge-based spatial frequency response (e-SFR)
6.1 General
The edge-based spatial frequency response (e-SFR) of an electronic still-picture camera is measured
by analysing the camera data near a slanted low contrast neutral edge. The preferred test chart for
measuring e-SFR is shown in Figure 4 and specified in Annex C.
Figure 4 — Low contrast e-SFR test chart
The e-SFR measurement includes the capture of a digital image of the test chart and analysis of the
contents of the image file by a software program. This software can be accessed from www .iso
.org/ 12233. The SFR algorithm is defined in Annex D. A diagram depicting the key steps of the SFR
algorithm is shown in Figure 5.
The algorithm can automatically compute the e-SFR, using image data from a user-defined rectangular
region of the image which represents a near-vertically or near-horizontally oriented dark to light or
light to dark edge
...


SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-maj-2017
1DGRPHãþD
SIST ISO 12233:2014
)RWRJUDILMD(OHNWURQVNRSULND]RYDQMHPLUXMRþLKVOLN5HVROXFLMD ORþOMLYRVW LQ
IUHNYHQþQLRG]LYLYSURVWRUX
Photography - Electronic still picture imaging - Resolution and spatial frequency
responses
Photographie - Imagerie des prises de vues électroniques - Résolution et réponses en
fréquence spatiale
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: ISO 12233:2017
ICS:
37.040.10 Fotografska oprema. Photographic equipment.
Projektorji Projectors
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 12233
Third edition
2017-01
Photography — Electronic still picture
imaging — Resolution and spatial
frequency responses
Photographie — Imagerie des prises de vues électroniques —
Résolution et réponses en fréquence spatiale
Reference number
©
ISO 2017
© ISO 2017, Published in Switzerland
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland
Tel. +41 22 749 01 11
Fax +41 22 749 09 47
copyright@iso.org
www.iso.org
ii © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

Contents Page
Foreword .v
Introduction .vi
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Test conditions . 5
4.1 Test chart illumination . 5
4.2 Camera framing and lens focal length setting . 5
4.3 Camera focusing . 6
4.4 Camera settings . 6
4.5 White balance. 6
4.6 Luminance and colour measurements . 6
4.7 Gamma correction . 6
5 Visual resolution measurement . 7
5.1 General . 7
5.2 Test chart. 7
5.2.1 General. 7
5.2.2 Material . 7
5.2.3 Size . 7
5.2.4 Test patterns . 7
5.2.5 Test pattern modulation . 8
5.2.6 Positional tolerance . 8
5.3 Rules of judgement for visual observation . 8
5.3.1 Rules of judgement . 8
5.3.2 An example of a correct visual judgement . 9
6 Edge-based spatial frequency response (e-SFR) . 9
6.1 General . 9
6.2 Methodology .10
6.2.1 Selection of the edge region of interest (ROI) . .10
6.2.2 Transformation into effective exposure .10
6.2.3 Estimation of the location of the edge .10
6.2.4 Formation of a super-sampled line spread function array .12
6.2.5 Computation of the e-SFR .13
7 Sine-based spatial frequency response (s-SFR) measurement .13
8 Presentation of results .14
8.1 General .14
8.2 Resolution .14
8.2.1 General.14
8.2.2 Basic presentation .14
8.2.3 Representative presentation .14
8.3 Spatial frequency response (SFR) .15
8.3.1 General.15
8.3.2 Spatial frequency response . .15
8.3.3 Report of resolution value derived from the s-SFR .16
Annex A (informative) CIPA resolution test chart .17
Annex B (informative) Visual resolution measurement software .23
Annex C (informative) Low contrast edge SFR test chart with OECF patches .28
Annex D (normative) Edge spatial frequency response (e-SFR) algorithm .30
Annex E (normative) Sine wave star test chart .33
Annex F (normative) Sine wave spatial frequency response (s-SFR) analysis algorithm .35
Annex G (informative) Colour-filtered resolution measurements .39
Annex H (informative) Units and summary metrics .41
Annex I (informative) Original test chart defined in ISO 12233:2000 .44
Bibliography .48
iv © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www .iso .org/ directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www .iso .org/ patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity assessment,
as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the
Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: www . i so .org/ iso/ foreword .html.
The committee responsible for this document is ISO/TC 42, Photography.
This third edition cancels and replaces the second edition (ISO 12233:2014), of which it constitutes a
minor revision with changes in Annex D.
Introduction
Purpose
The spatial resolution capability is an important attribute of an electronic still-picture camera.
Resolution measurement standards allow users to compare and verify spatial resolution measurements.
This document defines terminology, test charts, and test methods for performing resolution
measurements for analogue and digital electronic still-picture cameras.
Technical background
For consumer digital cameras, the term resolution is often incorrectly interpreted as the number of
addressable photoelements. While there are existing protocols for determining camera pixel counts,
these are not to be confused with the interpretation of resolution as addressed in this document.
Qualitatively, resolution is the ability of a camera to optically capture finely spaced detail, and is usually
reported as a single valued metric. Spatial frequency response (SFR) is a multi-valued metric that
measures contrast loss as a function of spatial frequency. Generally, contrast decreases as a function of
spatial frequency to a level where detail is no longer visually resolved. This limiting frequency value is
the resolution of the camera. A camera’s resolution and its SFR are determined by a number of factors.
These include, but are not limited to, the performance of the camera lens, the number of addressable
photoelements in the optical imaging device, and the electrical circuits in the camera, which can include
image compression and gamma correction functions.
While resolution and SFR are related metrics, their difference lies in their comprehensiveness and utility.
As articulated in this document, resolution is a single frequency parameter that indicates whether the
output signal contains a minimum threshold of detail information for visual detection. In other words,
resolution is the highest spatial frequency that a candidate camera can usefully capture under cited
conditions. It can be very valuable for rapid manufacturing testing, quality control monitoring, or for
providing a simple metric that can be easily understood by end users. The algorithm used to determine
resolution has been tested with visual experiments using human observers and correlates well with
their estimation of high frequency detail loss.
SFR is a numerical description of how contrast is changed by a camera as a function of the spatial
frequencies that describe the contrast. It is very beneficial for engineering, diagnostic, and image
evaluation purposes and serves as an umbrella function from which such metrics as sharpness and
acutance are derived. Often, practitioners will select the spatial frequency associated with a specified
SFR level as a modified non-visual resolution value.
In a departure from the first edition of this document, two SFR measurements are described.
Additionally, the first SFR metrology method, edge-based spatial frequency response, is identical to
that described in the first edition, except that a lower contrast edge is used for the test chart. Regions
of interest (ROI) near slanted vertical and horizontal edges are digitized and used to compute the SFR
levels. The use of a slanted edge allows the edge gradient to be measured at many phases relative to the
image sensor photoelements and to yield a phase-averaged SFR response.
A second sine wave-based SFR metrology technique is introduced in the second edition. Using a sine
wave modulated target in a polar format (e.g. Siemens star), it is intended to provide an SFR response
that is more resilient to ill-behaved spatial frequency signatures introduced by the image content driven
processing of consumer digital cameras. In this sense, it is intended to enable easier interpretation of
SFR levels from such camera sources. Comparing the results of the edge-based SFR and the sine-based
SFR might indicate the extent to which nonlinear processing is used.
The first step in determining visual resolution or SFR is to capture an image of a suitable test chart with
the camera under test. The test chart should include features of sufficiently fine detail and frequency
content such as edges, lines, square waves, or sine wave patterns. The test chart defined in this document
has been designed specifically to evaluate electronic still-picture cameras. It has not necessarily been
designed to evaluate other electronic imaging equipment such as input scanners, CRT displays, hard-
copy printers, or electro-photographic copiers, nor individual components of an electronic still-picture
camera, such as the lens.
vi © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

Some of the measurements described in this document are performed using digital analysis techniques.
They are also applicable with the analogue outputs of the camera by digitizing the analogue signals if
there is adequate digitizing equipment.
Methods for measuring SFR and resolution — Selection rationale and guidance
This section is intended to provide more detailed rationale and guidance for the selection of the
different resolution metrology methods presented in this document. While resolution metrology
of analogue optical systems, by way of spatial frequency response, is well established and largely
consistent between methodologies (e.g. sine waves, lines, edges), metrology data for such systems are
normally captured under well-controlled conditions where the required data linearity and spatial
isotropy assumptions hold. Generally, it is not safe to assume these conditions for files from many
digital cameras, even under laboratory capture environments. Exposure and image content dependent
image processing of the digital image file before it is provided as a finished file to the user prevents
this. This processing yields different SFR responses depending on the features in the scene or in the
case of this document, the target. For instance, in-camera edge detection algorithms might specifically
operate on edge features and selectively enhance or blur them based on complex nonlinear decision
rules. Depending on the intent, these algorithms might also be tuned differently for repetitive scene
features such as those found in sine waves or bar pattern targets. Even for constrained camera settings
recommended in this document, these nonlinear operators can yield differing SFR results depending
on the target feature set. Naturally, this causes confusion on which targets to use, either alone or in
combination. Guidelines for selection are offered below.
Edges are common features in naturally occurring scenes. They also tend to act as visual acuity cues by
which image quality is judged and imaging artefacts are manifested. This logic prescribed their use for
SFR metrology in the past and current editions of this document. It is also why edge features are prone
to image processing in many consumer digital cameras: they are visually important. All other imaging
conditions being equal, camera SFRs using different target contrast edge features can be significantly
different, especially with respect to their morphology. This is largely due to nonlinear image processing
operators and would not occur for strictly linear imaging systems. To moderate this behaviour, a lower
contrast slanted edge feature (Figure C.1) was chosen to replace the higher contrast version of the
first edition. This feature choice still allows for acuity-amenable SFR results beyond the half-sampling
frequency and helps prevent nonlinear data clipping that can occur with high contrast target features.
It is also a more reliable rendering of visually important contrast levels in naturally occurring scenes.
Sine wave features have long been the choice for directly calculating SFR of analogue imaging systems
and they are intuitively satisfying. They have been introduced into the second edition based on
experiences from the edge-based approach. Because sine waves transition more slowly than edges,
they are not prone to being identified as edges in embedded camera processors. As such, the ambiguity
that image processing imposes on the SFR can be largely avoided by their use. Alternatively, if the image
processing is influenced by the absence of sharp features, more aggressive processing might be used
by the camera. A sine wave starburst test pattern (Figure 6) is adopted in the second edition. With
the appropriate analysis software, a sine wave-based SFR can be calculated up to the half-sampling
frequency. For the same reasons stated above, the sine wave-based target is also of low contrast and
consistent with that of the edge-based version. An added benefit of the target’s design over other sine
targets is its compactness and bi-directional features.
All experience suggests that there is no single SFR for today’s digital cameras. Even under the strict
capture constraints suggested in this document, the allowable feature sets that most digital cameras
offer prevent such unique characterization. Confusion can be reduced through complete documentation
of the capture conditions and camera setting for which the SFR was calculated. It has been suggested
that comparing edge-based and sine wave-based SFR results under the same capture conditions could
be a good tool in assessing the contribution of spatial image processing in digital cameras.
Finally, at times, a full SFR characterization is simply not required, such as in end of line camera
assembly testing. Alternately, SFR might be an intimidating obstacle to those not trained in its utility.
For those in need of a simple and intuitive space domain approach to resolution using repeating line
patterns, a visual resolution metric is also provided in this third edition of this document.
With such a variety of methods available for measuring resolution, there are bound to be differences
in measured resolution results. To benchmark the likely variations, the committee has published the
results of a pilot study using all of the proposed techniques and how they relate to each other. These
results are provided in Reference [20].
viii © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 12233:2017(E)
Photography — Electronic still picture imaging —
Resolution and spatial frequency responses
1 Scope
This document specifies methods for measuring the resolution and the SFR of electronic still-picture
cameras. It is applicable to the measurement of both monochrome and colour cameras which output
digital data or analogue video signals.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 14524, Photography — Electronic still-picture cameras — Methods for measuring opto-electronic
conversion functions (OECFs)
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— IEC Electropedia: available at http:// www .electropedia .org/
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at http:// www .iso .org/ obp
3.1
addressable photoelements
number of active photoelements in an image sensor (3.11)
Note 1 to entry: This equals the product of the number of active photoelement lines and the number of active
photoelements per line.
3.2
aliasing
output image artefacts that occur in a sampled imaging system (3.23) due to insufficient sampling
Note 1 to entry: These artefacts usually manifest themselves as moiré patterns in repetitive image features or as
jagged stair-stepping at edge transitions.
3.3
cycles per millimetre
cy/mm
spatial frequency unit defined as the number of spatial periods per millimetre
3.4
edge spread function
ESF
normalized spatial signal distribution in the linearized (3.15) output of an imaging system resulting
from imaging a theoretical infinitely sharp edge
3.5
effectively spectrally neutral
having spectral characteristics which result in a specific imaging system producing the same output as
for a spectrally neutral (3.25) object
3.6
electronic still-picture camera
camera incorporating an image sensor (3.11) that outputs an analogue or digital signal representing a
still picture
Note 1 to entry: This camera may also record or store an analogue or digital signal representing a still picture on
a removable media, such as a memory card or magnetic disc.
3.7
gamma correction
signal processing operation that changes the relative signal levels
Note 1 to entry: Gamma correction is performed, in part, to correct for the nonlinear light output versus signal
input characteristics of the display. The relationship between the light input level and the output signal level,
called the camera opto-electronic conversion function (OECF), provides the gamma correction curve shape for
an image capture device.
Note 2 to entry: The gamma correction is usually an algorithm, lookup table, or circuit which operates separately
on each colour component of an image.
3.8
horizontal resolution
resolution (3.22) value measured in the longer image dimension, corresponding to the horizontal
direction for a “landscape” image orientation, typically using a vertical or near vertical oriented test-
chart feature
3.9
image aspect ratio
ratio of the image width to the image height
3.10
image compression
process that alters the way digital image data are encoded to reduce the size of an image file
3.11
image sensor
electronic device that converts incident electromagnetic radiation into an electronic signal
EXAMPLE Charge coupled device (CCD) array, complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) array.
3.12
line pairs per millimetre
lp/mm
spatial frequency unit defined as the number of equal width black and white line pairs per millimetre
3.13
line spread function
LSF
normalized spatial signal distribution in the linearized (3.15) output of an imaging system resulting
from imaging a theoretical infinitely thin line
2 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

3.14
line widths per picture height
LW/PH
spatial frequency unit for specifying the width of a feature on a test chart (3.26) relative to the height of
the active area of the chart
Note 1 to entry: The value in LW/PH indicates the total number of lines of the same width which can be placed
edge to edge within the height of a test target or within the vertical field of view of a camera.
Note 2 to entry: This unit is used whatever the orientation of the “feature” (e.g. line). Specifically, it applies to
horizontal, vertical, and diagonal lines.
EXAMPLE If the height of the active area of the chart equals 20 cm, a black line of 1 000 LW/PH has a width
equal to 20/1 000 cm.
3.15
linearized
digital signal conversion performed to invert the camera opto-electronic conversion function (OECF) to
focal plane exposure or scene luminance
3.16
lines per millimetre
lines/mm
spatial frequency unit defined as the number of equal width black and white lines per millimetre
Note 1 to entry: One line pair per millimetre (lp/mm) is equal to 2 lines/mm.
3.17
modulation
normalized amplitude of signal levels
Note 1 to entry: This is the difference between the minimum and maximum signal levels divided by the average
signal level.
3.18
modulation transfer function
MTF
modulus of the optical transfer function (3.20)
Note 1 to entry: For the MTF to have significance, it is necessary that the imaging system be operating in an
isoplanatic region and in its linear range. Because most electronic still-picture cameras (3.6) provide spatial
colour sampling and nonlinear processing, a meaningful MTF of the camera can only be approximated through
the SFR. See ISO 15529:2010.
3.19
normalized spatial frequency
spatial frequency unit for specifying resolution characteristics of an imaging system in terms of cycles
per pixel rather than in cycles/millimetre or any other unit of length
3.20
optical transfer function
OTF
two-dimensional Fourier transform of the imaging system’s point spread function (3.21)
Note 1 to entry: For the OTF to have significance, it is necessary that the imaging system be operating in an
isoplanatic region and in its linear range. The OTF is a complex function whose modulus has unity value at
zero spatial frequency (see ISO 9334). Because most electronic still-picture cameras (3.6) provide spatial colour
sampling and nonlinear processing, a meaningful OTF of the camera can only be approximated through the SFR.
3.21
point spread function
PSF
normalized spatial signal distribution in the linearized (3.15) output of an imaging system resulting
from imaging a theoretical infinitely small point source
3.22
resolution
measure of the ability of a camera system, or a component of a camera system, to depict picture detail
3.23
sampled imaging system
imaging system or device which generates an image signal by sampling an image at an array of discrete
points, or along a set of discrete lines, rather than a continuum of points
Note 1 to entry: The sampling at each point is done using a finite-size sampling aperture or area.
3.24
spatial frequency response
SFR
relative amplitude response of an imaging system as a function of input spatial frequency
Note 1 to entry: The SFR is normally represented by a curve of the output response to an input sinusoidal spatial
luminance distribution of unit amplitude, over a range of spatial frequencies. The SFR is divided by its value at
the spatial frequency of 0 as normalization to yield a value of 1,0 at a spatial frequency of 0.
3.24.1
edge-based spatial frequency response
e-SFR
measured amplitude response of an imaging system to a slanted-edge input
Note 1 to entry: Measurement of e-SFR is as defined in Clause 6.
3.24.2
sine wave-based spatial frequency response
s-SFR
measured amplitude response of an imaging system to a range of sine wave inputs
Note 1 to entry: Measurement of s-SFR is as defined in Clause 7.
3.25
spectrally neutral
exhibiting reflective or transmissive characteristics which are constant over the wavelength range of
interest
3.26
test chart
arrangement of test patterns (3.27) designed to test particular aspects of an imaging system
3.27
test pattern
specified arrangement of spectral reflectance or transmittance characteristics used in measuring an
image quality attribute
3.27.1
bi-tonal pattern
pattern that is spectrally neutral (3.25) or effectively spectrally neutral (3.5), and consists exclusively of
two reflectance or transmittance values in a prescribed spatial arrangement
Note 1 to entry: Bi-tonal patterns are typically used to measure resolution (3.22) by visual resolution method.
4 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

3.27.2
hyperbolic wedge test pattern
bi-tonal pattern (3.27.1) that varies continuously and linearly with spatial frequency
Note 1 to entry: A bi-tonal hyperbolic wedge test pattern is used to measure resolution (3.22) by the visual
resolution method in this document.
3.28
vertical resolution
resolution (3.22) value measured in the shorter image dimension, corresponding to the vertical
direction for a “landscape” image orientation, typically using a horizontal or near horizontal oriented
test-chart feature
3.29
visual resolution
spatial frequency at which all of the individual black and white lines of a test pattern frequency can no
longer be distinguished by a human observer
Note 1 to entry: This presumes the features are reproduced on a display or print.
4 Test conditions
4.1 Test chart illumination
The luminance of the test chart shall be sufficient to provide an acceptable camera output signal level.
The test chart shall be uniformly illuminated as shown in Figure 1, so that the illuminance at the
chart is within ±10 % of the illuminance in the centre of the chart at any position within the chart.
The illumination sources should be baffled to prevent direct illumination of the camera lens by the
illumination sources. The area surrounding the test chart should be of low reflectance to minimize
flare light. The chart should be shielded from any reflected light. The illuminated test chart shall be
effectively spectrally neutral within the visible wavelengths.
Figure 1 — Test chart illumination method
4.2 Camera framing and lens focal length setting
The camera shall be positioned to properly frame the test target. The vertical framing arrows are used
to adjust the magnification and the horizontal arrows are used to centre the target horizontally. The
tips of the centre vertical black framing arrows should be fully visible and the tips of the centre white
framing arrows should not be visible. The target shall be oriented so that the horizontal edge of the
chart is approximately parallel to the horizontal camera frame line. The approximate distance between
the camera and the test chart should be reported along with the measurement results.
4.3 Camera focusing
The camera focus should be set either by using the camera autofocusing system, or by performing a
series of image captures at varying focus settings, and selecting the focus setting that provides the
highest average modulation level at a spatial frequency approximately 1/4 the camera Nyquist
frequency. (In the case of a colour camera, the Nyquist frequency is of the conceptual monochrome
image sensor without colour filter array). Auto focus accuracy is often limited and this limitation might
have an impact on the results.
4.4 Camera settings
The camera lens aperture (if adjustable) and the exposure time should be adjusted to provide a near
maximum signal level from the white test target areas. The settings shall not result in signal clipping in
either the white or black areas of the test chart, or regions of edge transitions.
Electronic still-picture cameras might include image compression, to reduce the size of the image files
and allow more images to be stored. The use of image compression can significantly affect resolution
measurements. Some cameras have switches that allow the camera to operate in various compression
or resolution modes. The values of all camera settings that might affect the results of the measurement,
including lens focal length, aperture and image quality (i.e. recording pixel number or compression)
mode (if adjustable), shall be reported along with the measurement results.
Multiple SFR measurements can be reported for different camera settings, including a setting that uses
the maximum lens aperture size (minimum f-number) and maximum camera gain.
4.5 White balance
For a colour camera, the camera white balance should be adjusted, if possible, to provide proper white
balance [equal red, green, and blue (RGB) signal levels] for the illumination light source, as specified in
ISO 14524.
4.6 Luminance and colour measurements
Resolution measurements are normally performed on the camera luminance signal. For colour cameras
that do not provide a luminance output signal, a luminance signal should be formed from an appropriate
combination of the colour records, rather than from a single channel such as green. The reader is
referred to ISO 12232 for the luminance signal calculation. Colour-filtered resolution measurements
can be performed as described in Annex G.
4.7 Gamma correction
The signal representing the image from an electronic still-picture camera will probably be a nonlinear
function of the scene luminance values. Since the SFR measurement is defined on a linearized output
signal and such a nonlinear response can affect SFR values, the signal shall be linearized before the
data analysis is performed. Linearization is accomplished by applying the inverse of the camera OECF
to the output signal via a lookup table or appropriate equation. The measurement of the OECF shall be
as specified in ISO 14524, using the standard reflection camera OECF test chart or using an integrated
OECF/resolution chart.
6 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

5 Visual resolution measurement
5.1 General
The visual resolution is the maximum value of the spatial frequency in LW/PH within a test pattern that
is able to be visually distinguished. A black and white hyperbolic wedge is used as the test pattern.
Because of aliasing artefacts in the high frequencies, actual resolution judgements can be ambiguous.
The objective visual resolution method cited herein using a hyperbolic wedge test pattern gives more
stable results by adopting the visual judgement rules described in 5.3 which have been used by a highly
skilled observer.
It can be measured analytically using computer analysis of captured images, as defined in Annex B. The
computer analysis method is intended to correlate with the subjective judgement of visual resolution
made by a skilled observer but is likely to yield a more consistent and objective result compared to
actual visual judgements. However, if there is a discrepancy between the results of the computer
analysis method and the judgement of a human observer, the judgement of the human observer takes
priority.
5.2 Test chart
5.2.1 General
The preferred test chart for measuring the visual resolution is the CIPA resolution chart, which is shown
in Figure 2 and specified in Annex A.
The chart shown in Figure 2 is designed to measure cameras having a resolution of less than
2 500 LW/PH. Nevertheless, it is possible to use the chart to measure the resolution of an electronic still
camera having a resolution greater than 2 500 LW/PH. This is accomplished by adjusting the camera
to target distance, or the focal length of the camera lens, so that the test chart active area fills only a
portion of the vertical image height of the camera. This fraction is then measured in the digital image,
by dividing the number of image lines in the camera image by the number of lines in the active chart
area. The values of all test chart features, in LW/PH, printed on the chart or specified in this document,
are multiplied by this fraction, to obtain their correct values. For example, if the chart fills 1/2 of the
vertical image height of the camera, then the multiplication factor is equal to 2 and a feature labelled as
2 000 LW/PH on the chart corresponds to 4 000 LW/PH using this chart framing.
NOTE Figure 2 includes an improved version of the test chart features originally defined in ISO 12233:2000.
This original test chart defined in ISO 12233:2000 is described in Annex I.
5.2.2 Material
The test chart can be either a transparency that is rear illuminated or a reflection test card that is front
illuminated. A reflection chart shall have an approximately Lambertian base material. A transparency
chart shall be rear illuminated by a diffuse source.
5.2.3 Size
The active height of reflection test charts should be no less than 20 cm. The active height of
transparencies shall be not less than 10 cm.
5.2.4 Test patterns
The test chart shall have bi-tonal patterns and should be spectrally neutral.
NOTE Bi-tonal test charts are easily manufactured and minimize the cost of producing the chart.
5.2.5 Test pattern modulation
For reflective charts, the ratio of the maximum chart reflectance, R , to the minimum chart
max
reflectance, R , for large test pattern areas should be not less than 40:1 and not greater than 80:1,
min
and shall be reported if it is outside this range. For transmissive charts, the ratio of the maximum chart
transmittance, T , to the minimum chart transmittance, T , for a large test pattern should be not
max min
less than 40:1 and not greater than 80:1, and shall be reported if it is outside this range. For a paper
base optical density of 0,10, these minimum and maximum numbers translate to optical densities of 1,7
and 2,0, respectively. Modulation ratios for the finer test chart features, relative to the ratio for large
test pattern areas, should preferably be reported by the chart manufacturer for reference.
5.2.6 Positional tolerance
The position of any test chart feature shall be reproduced with a tolerance of ±1/1 000 picture heights
(equivalent to ±1/10 % of the active test chart height). In addition, the width and duty cycle ratio of
each feature (white or black line) of the wedge pattern shall be reproduced with a tolerance of ±5 % of
the feature width.
Figure 2 — CIPA resolution test chart
5.3 Rules of judgement for visual observation
5.3.1 Rules of judgement
The viewer shall observe the following rules when judging the resolution value. These rules are
intended to achieve correct measurement value in the presence of unavoidable aliasing artefacts.
a) Beginning from the low frequency side, treat a spatial frequency as “Resolved” only when all lower
spatial frequencies are also resolved. The resolution limit is achieved at the line just before the first
occurrence of unresolved line features.
b) Treat a spatial frequency as “Not resolved” when the black and white lines appear to change polarity
or lines are blurred together to produce a reduced number of lines, compared to the number in the
test chart.
8 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

5.3.2 An example of a correct visual judgement
As shown in Figure 3, the boundary between the resolved (Key 1) and not resolved (Key 2) regions is
indicated by a dashed arrow, which corresp
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...