CEN ISO/TR 20659-2:2024

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-januar-2025
Reološke preskusne metode - Osnovni principi in medlaboratorijske primerjave -
2. del: Določanje spremembe strukture v odvisnosti od časa (tiksotropija) (ISO/TR
20659-2:2024)
Rheological test methods - Fundamentals and interlaboratory comparisons - Part 2:
Determination of the time-dependent structural change (thixotropy) (ISO/TR 20659-
2:2024)
Rheologische Prüfverfahren - Grundlagen und Ringversuch - Teil 2: Thixotropie (ISO/TR
20659-2:2024)
Méthodes d'essai rhéologiques - Principes fondamentaux et comparaisons
interlaboratoires - Partie 2: Détermination de la variation structurelle dans le temps
(thixotropie) (ISO/TR 20659-2:2024)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN ISO/TR 20659-2:2024
ICS:
87.040 Barve in laki Paints and varnishes
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

CEN ISO/TR 20659-2
TECHNICAL REPORT
RAPPORT TECHNIQUE
October 2024
TECHNISCHER REPORT
ICS 87.040
English Version
Rheological test methods - Fundamentals and
interlaboratory comparisons - Part 2: Determination of the
time-dependent structural change (thixotropy) (ISO/TR
20659-2:2024)
Méthodes d'essai rhéologiques - Principes Rheologische Prüfverfahren - Grundlagen und
fondamentaux et comparaisons interlaboratoires - Ringversuch - Teil 2: Thixotropie (ISO/TR 20659-
Partie 2: Détermination de la variation structurelle 2:2024)
dans le temps (thixotropie) (ISO/TR 20659-2:2024)

This Technical Report was approved by CEN on 6 October 2024. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 139.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2024 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN ISO/TR 20659-2:2024 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 3

European foreword
This document (CEN ISO/TR 20659-2:2024) has been prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 35
"Paints and varnishes" in collaboration with Technical Committee CEN/TC 139 “Paints and varnishes”
the secretariat of which is held by DIN.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Any feedback and questions on this document should be directed to the users’ national standards
body/national committee. A complete listing of these bodies can be found on the CEN website.
Endorsement notice
The text of ISO/TR 20659-2:2024 has been approved by CEN as CEN ISO/TR 20659-2:2024 without any
modification.
Technical
Report
ISO/TR 20659-2
First edition
Rheological test methods —
2024-03
Fundamentals and interlaboratory
comparisons —
Part 2:
Determination of the time-
dependent structural change
(thixotropy)
Méthodes d'essai rhéologiques — Principes fondamentaux et
comparaisons interlaboratoires —
Partie 2: Détermination de la variation structurelle dans le temps
(thixotropie)
Reference number
ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en) © ISO 2024

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
© ISO 2024
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii
ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Contents Page
Foreword .iv
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Measuring technique for the determination of thixotropy . 1
4.1 Conditions for the measuring technique .1
4.2 Flow curves, with evaluation of the hysteresis area (rotational test) .3
4.2.1 Specification of the measuring profile .3
4.2.2 Evaluation .5
4.3 Step test with recovery, as a rotational test with controlled shear rate .7
4.3.1 Specification of the measuring programme .7
4.3.2 Evaluation .8
4.4 Step test with recovery, as a rotational test with alternating controlled shear stress
and shear rate .9
4.4.1 Specification of the measuring programme .9
4.4.2 Evaluation .10
4.5 Step test with recovery, as a combined oscillatory and rotational test with controlled
shear strain and shear rate, respectively .10
4.5.1 Specification of the measuring programme .10
4.5.2 Evaluation . .11
5 Comparative testing programme . 14
5.1 Aim of the comparative testing programme.14
5.2 Performance of the tests .14
5.2.1 Preliminary test .14
5.2.2 Comparative testing programme . 15
5.3 Evaluation . 15
6 Result.16
6.1 General .16
6.2 Measurement of the Newtonian reference sample .17
6.2.1 Flow curve .17
6.3 Step test with specification of the shear rate in measuring segments 1 and 3 .17
6.4 Step test with controlled shear stress in measuring segments 1 and 3 .18
6.5 Step test as oscillatory test in measuring segments 1 and 3 .18
7 Analysis . .18
Annex A (informative) Details of the comparative testing programme .20
Annex B (informative) Explanatory notes .34
Bibliography .36

iii
ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee
has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations,
governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely
with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the different types
of ISO document should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
ISO draws attention to the possibility that the implementation of this document may involve the use of (a)
patent(s). ISO takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of any claimed patent
rights in respect thereof. As of the date of publication of this document, ISO had not received notice of (a)
patent(s) which may be required to implement this document. However, implementers are cautioned that
this may not represent the latest information, which may be obtained from the patent database available at
www.iso.org/patents. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions
related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the World Trade
Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 35, Paints and varnishes, Subcommittee SC 9,
General test methods for paints and varnishes.
A list of all parts in the ISO 20659 series can be found on the ISO website.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html

iv
Technical Report ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Rheological test methods — Fundamentals and
interlaboratory comparisons —
Part 2:
Determination of the time-dependent structural change
(thixotropy)
1 Scope
This document gives information on an interlaboratory comparison for the determination of the time-
dependent structural change (thixotropy) using rheological test methods. Thixotropy is the reversible, time-
dependent decrease of shear viscosity η at a constant shear rate γ or shear stress τ.
This document provides examples of fields of application, in which important material properties can be
characterized by the thixotropy. These fields of application include:
— effectiveness of rheological additives and thixotropic agents, respectively;
— stability of the structure at rest (e.g. behaviour when starting to pump);
— wet film thickness after processing;
— levelling and sagging behaviour (e.g. without brushmarks or sag formation);
— orientation of effect pigments.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes
requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references,
the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 3219-1, Rheology — Part 1: Vocabulary and symbols for rotational and oscillatory rheometry
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 3219-1 apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https:// www .electropedia .org/
4 Measuring technique for the determination of thixotropy
4.1 Conditions for the measuring technique
Clause 4 briefly describes methods that are currently in use. In principle, the thixotropy depends on the
temperature, the pressure, and the thermal and mechanical history of the material. A detailed specification
of the measuring profile is therefore a precondition for reproducible measurements and comparable

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
evaluation; this applies especially for the level of shear load (shear rates, shear stresses, shear strain,
oscillation frequencies), the duration of the individual measuring segments and the number of measuring
points.
Thixotropy can be determined by rotational as well as by oscillatory tests. Measuring devices equipped
with a mechanical bearing or air bearing are suitable for rotational tests. For oscillatory tests, a rheometer
with air bearing is used. It is essential to ensure that the measuring device is used in combination with
the suitable measuring geometry, i.e. in accordance with the torque range, the torque resolution and the
rotational speed range. Typically, rotational viscometers and rheometers that are subject to test equipment
monitoring and are regularly calibrated and verified (if necessary), are used. Measuring results that are
independent of geometry can only be obtained by using absolute measurement geometries according to
ISO 3219-2.
If, independently of the measuring device and the measuring method used, no time-stable measuring results
are obtained during the measurement of Newtonian standard samples, then the measuring device, the
measuring geometry or the measuring method is unsuitable. If the functional course of these time-stable
measured values meets the reference values within the used measuring range, it is guaranteed that the
measuring device, the measuring geometry and the measuring method are suitable for the investigation of
the sample. Typically, this inspection is carried out under isothermal conditions in the expected viscosity
range of the sample by using several Newtonian standard samples. If preliminary tests reveal that the
viscosity of the measuring sample varies over three decades, then the verification of the measuring device
and measuring geometry are performed with three Newtonian standard samples. This is carried out for all
measuring temperatures. The influences due to application, e.g. sample filling, evaporation, shear heating,
wrong choice of method and the sample material coming out of the gap, are mostly discernible and detected
by this kind of verification.
Upon measurement, the possibility of evaporation is considered. A reduction of this influence can be
reached, e.g. by using a sample area coverage. All boundary conditions of the measurement are documented
in the record, especially the usage of a coverage, the kind of sample trimming and the adjustment of the gap
distance. According to the specifications of the measuring methods described in Clause 4, the methods are
changed if influences on the measuring results occur. Another parameter is checking whether the duration
of the load is shorter than the medium time scale of the structural changes of the sample. This is determined
for each measuring method and its specifications by preliminary tests. However, the duration of the load
is selected in consideration of situations where conditions of application of the sample are longer. If this
duration is longer than the time scale of structural change of the sample, then a thixotropic behaviour will
not be detected; nevertheless, the sample can be still thixotropic. In order to determine the thixotropy in a
correct and reproducible manner, when filling the measuring geometry, the influence that the time between
filling and the start of the measurement has on the measuring result is taken into consideration. This time
is distinctly longer than the time scale of the structural change. This can be determined by preliminary
measurements in which the waiting time is varied. The waiting time is sufficiently high if the thixotropy
of the sample is comparable for two measurements running after a fresh filling within the limits of the
requested precision in accordance with the measuring method chosen.
Measuring points can only be recorded if each single measuring point is controlled by the instrument
according to the specification. At every change of the specified value, a transient process of the entire
measuring equipment occurs towards the new specified value. This transient process can be different (see
Figure 1).
ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Key
X time, t
Y
shear stress, τ, or shear rate, γ
1 specified function
2, 3, 4 different adjustment behaviours
Figure 1 — Different transient behaviour during the controlling of each individual measuring point
The measuring point is not detected until the deviation between the specified value and the desired value is
small enough. The integration time (time per measuring point minus adjustment time), which is considered
for calculating the average of a data point, influences the measuring result. This condition is valid for
constant shear load as well as for a time-dependent change of the load.
4.2 Flow curves, with evaluation of the hysteresis area (rotational test)
4.2.1 Specification of the measuring profile
The specification is provided in the form of three measuring segments comprising a continuous or a step-
like discontinuous upward ramp, a holding time and a downward ramp (see Figures 2 and 3). The shear rate

γ is specified as a function of time. Both ramp types can be used with linear and logarithmic distribution.
This is valid for the shear rate and for the time duration of the measuring points. At the beginning, this can
also be preceded by a segment with defined pre-shear and/or a waiting time without shear (e.g. 5 min).

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Key
shear rate
γ
t time
Figure 2 — Specified profile: shear rate and time function with the three measuring segments:
continuous upward ramp, holding time and continuous downward ramp
Key
 shear rate
γ
t time
Figure 3 — Specified profile: shear rate/time function with the three measuring segments: stepped
upward ramp, holding time and stepped downward ramp
Proposals for a typical measuring programme include Method A and Method B.
Method A, with a linear ramp for the shear rate, includes:
−1 −1

1) upward ramp withγ = 0 s to 1 000 s , duration 3 min, with 45 measuring points;
−1
2) holding time withγ = 1 000 s = constant, duration 1 min, with 15 measuring points;
−1 −1
3) downward ramp withγ = 1 000 s to 0 s , duration 3 min, with 45 measuring points.
The period of time for the up- and down-ramps is the same. Moreover, it is defined whether the test is carried
out with continuous or step-like ramp.
Method B, with a logarithmic ramp for the shear rate, includes:
−1 −1
4) upward ramp with γ = 0,1 s to 1 000 s , duration 3 min, with 61 measuring points. If a viscometer
−1
with a mechanical bearing is used, then 10 s can be used as the minimum shear rate;
−1

5) holding time withγ = 1 000 s = constant, duration 1 min, with 15 measuring points;
−1 −1
6) downward ramp withγ = 1 000 s to 0,1 s , duration 3 min, with 61 measuring points.

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
The period of time for the up- and down-ramps is the same. Moreover, it is defined whether the test is carried
out with continuous or step-like ramp.
4.2.2 Evaluation
If the measuring sample displays behaviour that varies with shear load and time, a so-called hysteresis area
is generated between the upward and downward flow curves. Here, hysteresis means curve loop. Flow
−1

curves are usually presented as shear stress τ (in Pa) against shear rate γ (in s ) (see Figure 4).
Key
shear stress
τ
shear rate

γ
1 hysteresis area with reduction of structural strength under shear load
2 hysteresis area with increase in structural strength under shear load
Figure 4 — Measuring result: flow curves with hysteresis area
When the shear rate increases from zero to a maximum value and then decreases to zero following a defined
time programme, the hysteresis curve is generated from the two resulting flow curves, which do not overlap.
A larger area is an indication for a stronger change in structure. The structural strength can decrease or
increase.
The duration of the upward ramp and downward ramp depends on the material. If it is too long, the
superstructure of the measuring sample is reduced too much already during the upward ramp. As a result,
the hysteresis area can become too small for a meaningful evaluation.
−1
This evaluation is performed by calculating the hysteresis area in Pa·s .
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show typical measuring results for a waterborne coating material obtained with the
two measuring methods, A and B.
With a linear ramp, the shear load is higher overall across the entire shear rate range compared to the
logarithmic ramp. This results in a smaller calculated hysteresis area. The advantage of Method B is that
more measuring points are recorded in the lower shear rate range.
This measuring method provides information about the behaviour of the measuring sample in a continuous
shear process, but not about what happens when the shear load occurs at rest, for example whether and to
what extent recovery of the structure takes place. The method yields a first overview of the behaviour of the
investigated material.
ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Key
τ shear stress
 shear rate
γ
−1
NOTE The calculated hysteresis area for this method is 7 167 Pa·s .
Figure 5 — Flow curves measured using a linear ramp, with evaluation according to Method A
Key
shear stress
τ
γ shear rate
−1
NOTE The calculated hysteresis area for this method is 16 810 Pa·s .
Figure 6 — Flow curves measured using a logarithmic ramp, with evaluation according to Method B

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
4.3 Step test with recovery, as a rotational test with controlled shear rate
4.3.1 Specification of the measuring programme
The shear load is specified in the form of three measuring segments, first with a constant low shear rate,

then with a constant high shear rate, and finally again with a constant low shear rate γ (see Figure 7). At the
beginning, this can also be preceded by a segment with defined pre-shear and/or a waiting time without
shear (e.g. 5 min).
Key
 shear rate
γ
t time
1 low shear rate
2 high shear rate
3 low shear rate
Figure 7 — Specified profile: three measuring segments with a low shear rate, high shear rate and
then low shear rate again
Key
shear viscosity
η
t time
1 low shear load
2 high shear load with reduction of structural strength
3 low shear load with structural recovery
Figure 8 — Measuring result of time-dependent viscosity function of a thixotropic material
Proposals for a typical measuring programme are as follows:
−1
1) low shear rate withγ = 0,1 s = constant, duration 2 min, with 30 measuring points. If a viscometer
−1
with a mechanical bearing is used, then 10 s can be used as the minimum shear rate;
−1

2) high shear rate withγ = 1 000 s = constant, duration 2 min, with 30 measuring points;

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
−1

3) low shear rate withγ = 0,1 s = constant, duration 5 min, with 100 measuring points.
The shear rate for the measuring segments 1 and 3 is the same.
4.3.2 Evaluation
As a preparatory step, the average of the last 5 measuring points is formed for each of the three measuring
segments. Proposals for evaluation programmes are as follows (see also Figure 8):
1) Percentage structural recovery, expressed as a viscosity value at the end of measuring segment 3 in
comparison to the reference value of the end of measuring segment 1, with the result stated in per cent;
EXAMPLE 1 Reference value η = 10 Pa·s; and at the end of measuring segment 3 η = 8 Pa·s. Calculation:
1 3
(8 Pa·s/10 Pa·s) × 100 % = 80 %. See Figure 9.
Key
shear viscosity
η
t time
Figure 9 — Evaluation of the percentage structural recovery
2) Time points for 25 % and 50 % structural recovery in measuring segment 3 in comparison with the
reference value from the end of measuring segment 1, data in s;
EXAMPLE 2 Reference value η = 10 Pa·s; from the diagram or from the table of measuring data, the two time
points are determined at 25 % of the reference value on the one hand, therefore η = 2,5 Pa·s, and at 50 % of the
reference value on the other hand, therefore η = 5 Pa·s, is reached. See Figure 10.
Key
η shear viscosity
t time
Figure 10 — Time points for 25 % and 50 % structural recovery
3) Slope of the curve during structural recovery in the first 60 s of measuring segment 3, data in Pa·s/s;
EXAMPLE 3 Between the two viscosity values at the end of measuring segment 2 and after 60 s in measuring
segment 3, the slope of the connecting line is determined; this can be done by means of the diagram or with the
table of measuring data (see Figure 11).

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Key
η shear viscosity
t time
Figure 11 — Slope of the curve during structural recovery
4) Structure-recovery index (SRI) calculated as logarithm of the viscosity value after the beginning of
measuring segment 3 (e.g. after 30 s), minus the logarithm of the viscosity value at the end of measuring
segment 2;
5) Thixotropy index (TI) calculated as logarithm of the viscosity value at the end of measuring segment 3
(e.g. after 300 s) minus the logarithm of the viscosity value at the end of measuring segment 2.
4.4 Step test with recovery, as a rotational test with alternating controlled shear stress and
shear rate
4.4.1 Specification of the measuring programme
The shear load is specified in the form of three measuring segments, first with a constant low shear stress τ,
then with a constant high shear rate, and finally again with a constant low shear stress τ (see Figure 12). At
the beginning, this can also be preceded by a segment with defined pre-shear and/or a waiting time without
shear (e.g. 5 min).
In order to determine a meaningful specification value for the shear stress in measuring segments 1 and 3,
preliminary tests for determination of the yield point are performed (see ISO/TR 20659-1). The specified
value lies above the yield point value.

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Key
τ shear stress
 shear rate
γ
t time
1 low shear stress
2 high shear rate
3 low shear stress
Figure 12 — Specified profile: three measuring segments with low shear stress, high shear rate, and
again with low shear stress
Proposals for a typical measuring programme are as follows:
1) low shear stress with τ = constant (the specified value for τ is dependent upon the preliminary test),
duration 2 min, with 30 measuring points;
−1

2) high shear rate withγ = 1 000 s = constant, duration 2 min, with 30 measuring points;
3) low shear stress with τ = constant, duration 5 min, with 100 measuring points.
The shear stress for the measuring segments 1 and 3 is the same.
4.4.2 Evaluation
With this measuring method, the evaluation is performed in the same way as described in 4.3 and shown in
Figure 8 to Figure 11.
NOTE A disadvantage of this method is that preliminary tests are crucial in order to find meaningful specification
values for the shear stress in measuring segments 1 and 3.
4.5 Step test with recovery, as a combined oscillatory and rotational test with controlled
shear strain and shear rate, respectively
4.5.1 Specification of the measuring programme
For carrying out the step tests, a rheometer with air bearing can be used.
The shear load is specified in the form of three measuring segments, the first with a constant low shear

strain γ and constant frequency in the form of an oscillatory test, then with a constant high shear rate γ as a
rotational test, and finally again with a constant low shear strain γ and constant frequency as an oscillatory
test (see Figure 13).
−1
The speed of oscillation can be stated both as a frequency f (in Hz) and as an angular frequency ω (in s )
(the following applies: ω = 2 π · f ).

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
A shear strain value is deemed to be low enough, and therefore suitable, if it lies in the linear viscoelastic
region. This specification is examined in advance with an amplitude sweep.
At the beginning, this can also be preceded by a segment with defined pre-shear and/or a waiting time
without shear (e.g. 5 min).
Key
γ shear strain
 shear rate
γ
t time
1 low shear strain (as an oscillation)
2 high shear rate (as a rotation)
3 low shear stress (as an oscillation)
Figure 13 — Specified profile: step function with the three measuring segments
Proposals for a typical measuring programme are as follows:
1) low shear strain as an oscillation with f = 1 Hz and γ = constant (the specified value for γ is dependent
upon the preliminary test, e.g. γ = 1 %), duration 2 min, with 30 measuring points;
−1
2) high shear rate withγ = 1 000 s = constant, duration 2 min, with 30 measuring points;
3) low shear strain as an oscillation with f = 1 Hz and γ = constant [as in 1) above, the specified value for γ
is dependent upon the preliminary test], duration 5 min, with 100 measuring points. The frequency and
the shear strain for the measuring segments 1 and 3 are the same.
4.5.2 Evaluation
When using oscillatory tests, the following measured parameters can be evaluated:
— the shear storage modulus G' (in Pa) describes the elastic part of the viscoelastic behaviour of the
measuring sample;
— the shear loss modulus G” (in Pa) describes the viscous part;
— the absolute value of the complex shear viscosity |η*| (in Pa·s);
— the loss angle δ (in °, i.e. degrees) represents the time delay (phase shift) between the specified measured
value and the resulting measured value;
— the loss factor tanδ = G”/G' is the ratio of G” to G'.
In the following, proposals for evaluation programmes are shown (see also Figure 14). Instead of the
G’ values, the values for the absolute value of the complex shear viscosity |η*| can be chosen as an alternative
(see Figure 15).
ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Key
G‘ shear storage modulus
G“ shear loss modulus
η shear viscosity
t time
1 low shear load
2 high shear load with reduction of structural strength
3 low shear load with structural recovery
Figure 14 — Measuring result: time-dependent functions of a thixotropic material as shear storage
modulus G' and shear loss modulus G”
Key
|η*| complex shear viscosity
η shear viscosity
t time
1 low shear load
2 high shear load with reduction of structural strength
3 low shear load with structural recovery
Figure 15 — Measuring result: time-dependent functions of a thixotropic material as the absolute
value of complex shear viscosity |η*|
1) Percentage structural recovery expressed as the value of the shear storage modulus G' at the end of
measuring segment 3 in comparison with the reference value from the end of measuring segment 1,
data in %;
EXAMPLE 1 Reference value G' = 20 Pa, and at the end of measuring segment 3 G' = 16 Pa. Calculation:
1 3
(16 Pa/20 Pa) · 100 % = 80 %. See Figure 16.

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Key
G‘ shear storage modulus
t time
Figure 16 — Evaluation of the percentage structural recovery
2) Time points for 25 % and 50 % structural recovery in measuring segment 3 in comparison with the
reference value from the end of measuring segment 1, data in s;
EXAMPLE 2 Reference value G' = 20 Pa. From the diagram or from the table of measuring data, the two time
points are determined at which:
a) on the one hand 25 % of the reference value, here therefore G' = 5 Pa is reached;
b) on the other hand 50 % of the reference value, here therefore G' = 10 Pa, is reached.
See Figure 17.
Key
G‘ shear storage modulus
t time
Figure 17 — Time points for 25 % and 50 % structural recovery
−1
3) Slope of the curve during structural recovery in the first 60 s of measuring segment 3, data in Pa·s ;
EXAMPLE 3 The slope of the connecting line between the two shear storage modulus values at the end of
measuring segment 2 and after 60 s in measuring segment 3 is determined; this can be done with the aid of the
diagram or the table of measuring data. See Figure 18.

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Key
G‘ shear storage modulus
t time
Figure 18 — Slope of the curve during structural recovery
4) Time point of the sol/gel transition in measuring segment 3 (when δ = 45° or tanδ = G”/G' = 1 is attained),
data in s.
EXAMPLE 4 The point of intersection of the curves of G' and G” is determined; this can be done by
means of the diagram or with the table of measuring data. See Figure 14.
5 Comparative testing programme
5.1 Aim of the comparative testing programme
Two comparative testing programmes were carried out in the laboratories of the working group members.
The first comparative testing programme was carried out to prove the fundamental suitability of the
four methods for determination of the thixotropic properties of coating materials. Moreover, it has been
investigated which preconditions concerning the measuring run and the measuring procedure are made
to guarantee an acceptable reproducibility of the results. In the second comparative testing programme,
special emphasis was given to the determination of precision data (repeatability, reproducibility).
Some background information on the original interlaboratory test is given in Annex B.
5.2 Performance of the tests
5.2.1 Preliminary test
In first comparative testing programmes, a Newtonian reference sample of the National Metrology
Institute of Germany (PTB) was measured together with five samples (three waterborne basecoats, a pasty
sealing compound and a dispersion). The samples were provided by members of the working group. Eight
laboratories contributed to the comparative testing programme. First, the measuring instruments used
were checked by measuring a flow curve of the Newtonian reference sample. Afterwards, each sample was
measured following the four methods described in 4.2 to 4.5. The respective measuring parameters (shear
time and shear stress, shear rate and amplitude, respectively) were given by the sample supplier and were
forwarded with the samples. Due to the fact that the measuring parameters of a method varied with the
samples, a broad spectrum of measuring procedures resulted.
From the results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
— the measured values in measuring segment 1 of the three step methods (4.3 to 4.5) varied significantly.
For this reason, standardized pre-treatment of the samples (pre-shear and waiting time) can therefore
be used;
— the viscosity of some samples in the recovery phase clearly exceeded the viscosity in measuring
−1
segment 1. This is an indication that, after application of a shear rate of 1 000 s , the structure does not
recover into the same original form that was present at the start of the measurement. In this case, the

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
viscosity of measuring segment 1 cannot be included in the evaluation. In the same way, the evaluation
of a hysteresis area for these samples is questionable;
— in order to minimize the evaporation of solvents, particularly when performing a measurement with a
cone-plate or plate-plate measuring geometry, the sample area is covered, as otherwise the viscosity can
change;
— the evaluation of the flow curves (viscosity at a defined shear rate) is usually made by a linear interpolation
procedure incorporated in the software. A large distance between measuring points, between which the
interpolation is carried out, distorts the result. For this reason, during the measurement of flow curves,
not only the number of measuring points but also their distribution is defined;
— the optimum shear stress during the performance of the shear stress-controlled step test is above
the yield point but, by contrast, during oscillatory recovery it is below the yield point, i.e. in the linear
viscoelastic region;
— the measurements were performed by all participants within a narrow time frame to rule out any
influence of the sample age.
5.2.2 Comparative testing programme
In order to check the rheometers, the flow curve of a certified Newtonian reference sample from PTB
(EF 166) was measured. The measurements were recorded three times.
Afterwards, a waterborne basecoat (WBC) and a conventional clear coat were measured following all four
methods described in Clause 4. The measurements were recorded three times.
The measurements of the flow curves were performed exclusively in accordance with 4.2, Method B, with a
logarithmic ramp.
The optimum shear stress for performance of the step test with specification of the shear stress in the
recovery phase as well as the optimum shear strain during the step test with recovery as an oscillatory test
were determined beforehand in test measurements. In a preliminary test with specification of the shear
stress below the yield point, severely varying measured values were obtained. As an outcome, the shear
stress in the first case is selected as a value above the yield point. By contrast, in the second case the shear
strain is expected to be within the linear viscoelastic region.
Based on the experiences of the first comparative testing programme, the following agreements were
reached:
— the measurements can be carried out by all participants within a defined week;
— the choice of the measuring geometry (cone-plate and/or coaxial cylinder) was left to the participants,
but was required to be noted in the table of results;
— in measurements with a cone-plate geometry, the use of a cover was mandatory in order to restrict
evaporation of solvents. No solvents were filled into the sample area coverage;
— defined sampling and filling the measuring geometry;
−1
— after filling the measuring geometry, a shear rate was initially applied to the samples for 1 min at 100 s ,
then tempered for 5 min without shearing at 23 °C;
— the number of measuring points was defined for all tests.
5.3 Evaluation
The measuring results were evaluated following the methods described in Clause 4. Moreover, further
evaluations were carried out to get as complete a picture as possible for repeatability and reproducibility.
The following evaluations were carried out:

ISO/TR 20659-2:2024(en)
Flow curve:
−1 −1 −1
— shear viscosity during
...