Standard Practice for Preparing Sulfur Prints for Macrostructural Evaluation

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 The sulfur print reveals the distribution of sulfur as sulfide inclusions in the specimen. The sulfur print complements macroetch methods by providing an additional procedure for evaluating the homogeneity of a steel product.  
5.2 Sulfur prints of as-cast specimens generally reveal the solidification pattern and may be used to assess the nature of deoxidation, that is, rimming action versus killed steel sulfur distributions.  
5.3 Sulfur prints will reveal segregation patterns, including refilled cracks, and may reveal certain physical irregularities, for example, porosity or cracking.  
5.4 The nature of metal flow, such as in various forging operations, can be revealed using sulfur prints of specimens cut parallel to the metal flow direction.  
5.5 The sulfur print method is suitable for process control, research and development studies, failure analysis, and for material acceptance purposes.  
5.6 The intensity of the sulfur print is influenced by the concentration of sulfur in the steel, the chemical composition of the sulfide inclusions, the aggressiveness of the aqueous acid solution, and the duration of the contact printing between the acid soaked emulsion coated paper and the ground surface of the specimen (this time is the order of seconds rather than minutes). Very low sulfur content steels will produce too faint an image to be useful for macrostructural evaluations. Selection of appropriate printing practices including selection of type of emulsion coated media, acid type and strength, will yield satisfactory prints. Very faint images in the sulfur print can be made more visible by scanning the sulfur print into a PC, and using a photo editor to increase the color saturation. Steels with compositions that produce predominantly titanium or chromium sulfides will not produce useful images.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice provides information required to prepare sulfur prints (also referred to as Baumann Prints) of most ferrous alloys to reveal the distribution of sulfide inclusions.  
1.2 The sulfur print reveals the distribution of sulfides in steels with bulk sulfur contents between about 0.010 and 0.40 weight percent.  
1.3 Certain steels contain complex sulfides that do not respond to the test solutions, for example, steels containing titanium sulfides or chromium sulfides.  
1.4 The sulfur print test is a qualitative test. The density of the print image should not be used to assess the sulfur content of a steel. Under carefully controlled conditions, it is possible to compare print image intensities if the images are formed only by manganese sulfides.  
1.5 The sulfur print image will reveal details of the solidification pattern or metal flow from hot or cold working on appropriately chosen and prepared test specimens.  
1.6 This practice does not address acceptance criteria based on the use of the method.  
1.7 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific precautionary statements, see Section 9.  
1.9 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-Aug-2021
Technical Committee
E04 - Metallography

Relations

Effective Date
15-Nov-2023
Effective Date
01-Nov-2023
Effective Date
01-Jun-2015
Effective Date
01-Jun-2015
Effective Date
01-Nov-2014
Effective Date
01-Oct-2009
Effective Date
01-Jul-2007
Effective Date
01-Jul-2007
Effective Date
01-May-2007
Effective Date
01-Oct-2006
Effective Date
01-Oct-2006
Effective Date
10-May-2003
Effective Date
10-Dec-2001
Effective Date
10-Dec-2001
Effective Date
10-Apr-2001

Overview

ASTM E1180-08(2021): Standard Practice for Preparing Sulfur Prints for Macrostructural Evaluation outlines procedures for the preparation and use of sulfur prints, also known as Baumann prints, in the evaluation of the macrostructural features of most ferrous alloys, particularly steel. This practice enables the visual identification of sulfide inclusion distribution, assisting in the qualitative assessment of steel homogeneity and related features such as segregation, solidification patterns, and certain physical irregularities. As an essential method in metallurgical analysis, sulfur prints serve as a complement to macroetching, providing unique insights that enhance steel product evaluation.

Key Topics

  • Sulfur Print Methodology: Offers procedures for preparing sulfur prints, utilizing photographic paper soaked in dilute acid to reveal sulfur as sulfide inclusions.
  • Qualitative Analysis: Sulfur print is a qualitative, not quantitative, technique. It visualizes the distribution but cannot reliably measure sulfur content.
  • Macrostructural Insight: Reveals solidification patterns, segregation, refilled cracks, porosity, and cracking.
  • Material Flow Visualization: When specimens are prepared parallel to metal flow, the technique can show flow patterns from hot or cold working.
  • Material and Process Considerations: The practice applies to steels with bulk sulfur contents from approximately 0.010 to 0.40% by weight. Steels with certain chemical compositions, such as those containing titanium or chromium sulfides, may not display useful images.
  • Influencing Factors: The intensity of the sulfur print depends on sulfur concentration, sulfide inclusion composition, acid type and strength, and contact duration during printing.

Applications

  • Process Control: Provides fast, qualitative feedback on macrostructural homogeneity and segregation patterns in production environments.
  • Research and Development: Valuable for studies exploring inclusions and macrostructural behavior of new steel alloys or processing methods.
  • Failure Analysis: Assists in diagnosing the causes of steel failures related to inclusions, segregation, or flow patterns.
  • Material Acceptance: Offers additional assurance in material acceptance processes by revealing otherwise unseen structural features.
  • Quality Assurance: Enhances routine inspection methods by supplementing standard macroetch techniques.
  • Educational Tool: Supports metallographical education by visually demonstrating metallurgical phenomena such as rimming, killing, and solidification patterns.

Related Standards

Several ASTM standards are referenced for use alongside or in conjunction with ASTM E1180:

  • ASTM E3 - Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens
  • ASTM E7 - Terminology Relating to Metallography
  • ASTM E340 - Practice for Macroetching Metals and Alloys
  • ASTM E381 - Method of Macroetch Testing Steel Bars, Billets, Blooms, and Forgings
  • ASTM E407 - Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys

Practical Value

Employing ASTM E1180-08(2021) enables more comprehensive macrostructural evaluation for steel products by providing an effective means to visualize the distribution of sulfide inclusions. This standard is especially useful for quality control, material assessment, and research applications where a visual understanding of steel homogeneity, flow, and defect structures is critical. By adhering to this well-established ASTM practice, organizations can ensure consistency, compliance, and enhanced insight into steel products' structural reliability and performance.

Keywords: sulfur print, macrostructural evaluation, sulfide inclusions, steel homogeneity, ASTM E1180, Baumann print, metallography, process control, segregation analysis, quality assurance.

Buy Documents

Standard

ASTM E1180-08(2021) - Standard Practice for Preparing Sulfur Prints for Macrostructural Evaluation

English language (5 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

ECOCERT

Organic and sustainability certification.

COFRAC France Verified

Eurofins Food Testing Global

Global leader in food, environment, and pharmaceutical product testing.

COFRAC Luxembourg Verified

Intertek Bangladesh

Intertek certification and testing services in Bangladesh.

BAB Bangladesh Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

ASTM E1180-08(2021) is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Practice for Preparing Sulfur Prints for Macrostructural Evaluation". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 The sulfur print reveals the distribution of sulfur as sulfide inclusions in the specimen. The sulfur print complements macroetch methods by providing an additional procedure for evaluating the homogeneity of a steel product. 5.2 Sulfur prints of as-cast specimens generally reveal the solidification pattern and may be used to assess the nature of deoxidation, that is, rimming action versus killed steel sulfur distributions. 5.3 Sulfur prints will reveal segregation patterns, including refilled cracks, and may reveal certain physical irregularities, for example, porosity or cracking. 5.4 The nature of metal flow, such as in various forging operations, can be revealed using sulfur prints of specimens cut parallel to the metal flow direction. 5.5 The sulfur print method is suitable for process control, research and development studies, failure analysis, and for material acceptance purposes. 5.6 The intensity of the sulfur print is influenced by the concentration of sulfur in the steel, the chemical composition of the sulfide inclusions, the aggressiveness of the aqueous acid solution, and the duration of the contact printing between the acid soaked emulsion coated paper and the ground surface of the specimen (this time is the order of seconds rather than minutes). Very low sulfur content steels will produce too faint an image to be useful for macrostructural evaluations. Selection of appropriate printing practices including selection of type of emulsion coated media, acid type and strength, will yield satisfactory prints. Very faint images in the sulfur print can be made more visible by scanning the sulfur print into a PC, and using a photo editor to increase the color saturation. Steels with compositions that produce predominantly titanium or chromium sulfides will not produce useful images. SCOPE 1.1 This practice provides information required to prepare sulfur prints (also referred to as Baumann Prints) of most ferrous alloys to reveal the distribution of sulfide inclusions. 1.2 The sulfur print reveals the distribution of sulfides in steels with bulk sulfur contents between about 0.010 and 0.40 weight percent. 1.3 Certain steels contain complex sulfides that do not respond to the test solutions, for example, steels containing titanium sulfides or chromium sulfides. 1.4 The sulfur print test is a qualitative test. The density of the print image should not be used to assess the sulfur content of a steel. Under carefully controlled conditions, it is possible to compare print image intensities if the images are formed only by manganese sulfides. 1.5 The sulfur print image will reveal details of the solidification pattern or metal flow from hot or cold working on appropriately chosen and prepared test specimens. 1.6 This practice does not address acceptance criteria based on the use of the method. 1.7 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific precautionary statements, see Section 9. 1.9 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 The sulfur print reveals the distribution of sulfur as sulfide inclusions in the specimen. The sulfur print complements macroetch methods by providing an additional procedure for evaluating the homogeneity of a steel product. 5.2 Sulfur prints of as-cast specimens generally reveal the solidification pattern and may be used to assess the nature of deoxidation, that is, rimming action versus killed steel sulfur distributions. 5.3 Sulfur prints will reveal segregation patterns, including refilled cracks, and may reveal certain physical irregularities, for example, porosity or cracking. 5.4 The nature of metal flow, such as in various forging operations, can be revealed using sulfur prints of specimens cut parallel to the metal flow direction. 5.5 The sulfur print method is suitable for process control, research and development studies, failure analysis, and for material acceptance purposes. 5.6 The intensity of the sulfur print is influenced by the concentration of sulfur in the steel, the chemical composition of the sulfide inclusions, the aggressiveness of the aqueous acid solution, and the duration of the contact printing between the acid soaked emulsion coated paper and the ground surface of the specimen (this time is the order of seconds rather than minutes). Very low sulfur content steels will produce too faint an image to be useful for macrostructural evaluations. Selection of appropriate printing practices including selection of type of emulsion coated media, acid type and strength, will yield satisfactory prints. Very faint images in the sulfur print can be made more visible by scanning the sulfur print into a PC, and using a photo editor to increase the color saturation. Steels with compositions that produce predominantly titanium or chromium sulfides will not produce useful images. SCOPE 1.1 This practice provides information required to prepare sulfur prints (also referred to as Baumann Prints) of most ferrous alloys to reveal the distribution of sulfide inclusions. 1.2 The sulfur print reveals the distribution of sulfides in steels with bulk sulfur contents between about 0.010 and 0.40 weight percent. 1.3 Certain steels contain complex sulfides that do not respond to the test solutions, for example, steels containing titanium sulfides or chromium sulfides. 1.4 The sulfur print test is a qualitative test. The density of the print image should not be used to assess the sulfur content of a steel. Under carefully controlled conditions, it is possible to compare print image intensities if the images are formed only by manganese sulfides. 1.5 The sulfur print image will reveal details of the solidification pattern or metal flow from hot or cold working on appropriately chosen and prepared test specimens. 1.6 This practice does not address acceptance criteria based on the use of the method. 1.7 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific precautionary statements, see Section 9. 1.9 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

ASTM E1180-08(2021) is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 71.060.10 - Chemical elements. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ASTM E1180-08(2021) has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM E340-23, ASTM E407-23, ASTM E7-15, ASTM E407-07(2015)e1, ASTM E7-14, ASTM E7-03(2009), ASTM E3-01(2007)e1, ASTM E3-01(2007), ASTM E407-07, ASTM E340-00(2006), ASTM E381-01(2006), ASTM E7-03, ASTM E7-01, ASTM E7-00, ASTM E381-01. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ASTM E1180-08(2021) is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: E1180 − 08 (Reapproved 2021)
Standard Practice for
Preparing Sulfur Prints for Macrostructural Evaluation
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1180; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
1.1 This practice provides information required to prepare 2.1 ASTM Standards:
sulfur prints (also referred to as Baumann Prints) of most
E3 Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens
ferrous alloys to reveal the distribution of sulfide inclusions.
E7 Terminology Relating to Metallography
E340 Practice for Macroetching Metals and Alloys
1.2 The sulfur print reveals the distribution of sulfides in
E381 Method of Macroetch Testing Steel Bars, Billets,
steels with bulk sulfur contents between about 0.010 and 0.40
Blooms, and Forgings
weight percent.
E407 Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys
1.3 Certain steels contain complex sulfides that do not
respond to the test solutions, for example, steels containing
3. Terminology
titanium sulfides or chromium sulfides.
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms used in this
1.4 The sulfur print test is a qualitative test. The density of
practice, see Terminology E7.
the print image should not be used to assess the sulfur content
of a steel. Under carefully controlled conditions, it is possible
4. Summary of Practice
to compare print image intensities if the images are formed
4.1 The sulfur print provides a means for macroscopic
only by manganese sulfides.
evaluation of the sulfur distribution in steels and cast irons by
1.5 The sulfur print image will reveal details of the solidi-
contact printing using photographic paper soaked in an aque-
fication pattern or metal flow from hot or cold working on
ous acid solution, for example, sulfuric acid, citric acid, or
appropriately chosen and prepared test specimens.
acetic acid.
1.6 This practice does not address acceptance criteria based
4.2 The test specimen is usually a disk or rectangular
on the use of the method.
section, such as used in macroetch evaluations, cut from an
1.7 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
as-cast or wrought specimen with either a transverse or
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
longitudinal orientation. The specimen is freshly ground
standard.
smooth and cleaned to remove cutting oils, scale, abrasives, or
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the
other contaminants. The specimen should be at room tempera-
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
ture when sulfur printed.
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
4.3 A sheet of photographic paper with (usually) a matte
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
surface finish of appropriate size is soaked in the dilute
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
aqueous acid solution, any excess liquid removed, and the
For specific precautionary statements, see Section 9.
emulsion side of the paper is placed on the ground surface of
1.9 This international standard was developed in accor-
the specimen. After a suitable time, the paper is removed,
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
washed in water, fixed, washed again in water, and dried as flat
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
as possible.
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
4.4 The distribution of sulfur in the specimen is revealed as
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
a mirror image on the photographic paper as darkly colored
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
areas of silver sulfide embedded in the emulsion.
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E04 on Metallog-
raphy and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E04.01 on Specimen
Preparation. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved Sept. 1, 2021. Published September 2021. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 1987. Last previous edition approved in 2014 as E1180 – 08(2014). Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
DOI: 10.1520/E1180-08R21. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E1180 − 08 (2021)
5. Significance and Use If the pre-etchant contains sulfate ions (for example, a stainless
steel specimen etched with Marble’s reagent), the print will be
5.1 The sulfur print reveals the distribution of sulfur as
lightly colored, even if sulfides are not present in the steel.
sulfide inclusions in the specimen. The sulfur print comple-
Such etchants should not be used for this purpose.
ments macroetch methods by providing an additional proce-
dure for evaluating the homogeneity of a steel product. 6.6 If chromium replaces some of the manganese in the
sulfide inclusions, the print intensity for a given sulfur level
5.2 Sulfur prints of as-cast specimens generally reveal the
will be reduced.An image will not be obtained, irrespective of
solidification pattern and may be used to assess the nature of
thesulfurcontent,iftitaniumorchromiumsulfidesarepresent.
deoxidation, that is, rimming action versus killed steel sulfur
distributions.
7. Apparatus
5.3 Sulfur prints will reveal segregation patterns, including
7.1 Lighting—If the chosen photographic paper when ex-
refilled cracks, and may reveal certain physical irregularities,
posed to the existing room light for 15 min changes from white
for example, porosity or cracking.
to light blue and then clears back to white when processed in
5.4 The nature of metal flow, such as in various forging
the sequence of solutions, there is no need to turn off the
operations,canberevealedusingsulfurprintsofspecimenscut
existing white lighting, and work under amber bulb lighting;
parallel to the metal flow direction.
never expose the paper to sunlight.
5.5 The sulfur print method is suitable for process control,
7.2 Shallow Container, such as a photographic tray, is
research and development studies, failure analysis, and for
required to contain the dilute aqueous acid solution. The
material acceptance purposes.
container must be large enough to soak the emulsion coated
5.6 The intensity of the sulfur print is influenced by the paper without wrinkling.
concentration of sulfur in the steel, the chemical composition
7.3 Timing Device, such as used in a photographic
ofthesulfideinclusions,theaggressivenessoftheaqueousacid
darkroom, is helpful for timing the contact printing time, and
solution, and the duration of the contact printing between the
the washing and fixing periods.
acid soaked emulsion coated paper and the ground surface of
7.4 Tank, of suitable size with cool flowing water, is
the specimen (this time is the order of seconds rather than
required for washing the print.
minutes). Very low sulfur content steels will produce too faint
an image to be useful for macrostructural evaluations. Selec- 7.5 Tank, or Covered Tray, to hold the fixing agent and the
tion of appropriate printing practices including selection of print; two can be used sequentially for faster fixing when using
type of emulsion coated media, acid type and strength, will emulsion coated double weight fiber based paper.
yield satisfactory prints. Very faint images in the sulfur print
7.6 Drying—Heated drum dryers are no longer made.
can be made more visible by scanning the sulfur print into a
Heated drying cabinets are available for fiber base prints laid
PC, and using a photo editor to increase the color saturation.
horizontally on a screen. Resin coated papers can be dried with
Steels with compositions that produce predominantly titanium
an infra red dryer very quickly. Clothes lines and cork peg
or chromium sulfides will not produce useful images.
boards will also work but the prints do not dry perfectly flat.
6. Interferences
8. Reagents and Materials
6.1 The specimen must be properly cleaned, otherwise dark
8.1 Photographic paper is a multilayer paper coated with a
spots will be produced which may be incorrectly interpreted as
gelatin emulsion containing about 80 mg per square meter of
a gross sulfide segregate.
silver as a halide (Cl and/or Br) supported by a paper base that
6.2 Hydrogen sulfide gas is produced while the paper is in
is nominally single or double weight (110 g/sq. m or 235 g/sq.
contact with the specimen. The hydrogen sulfide is readily m).Thespeedandcontrastcharacteristicsareofnoimportance
absorbed by the wet emulsion. The hydrogen sulfide reacts
when sulfur printing.The paper base may be fibre base or resin
with the silver halides in the emulsion to lay down insoluble coated. A thin layer of baryta may separate the emulsion and
silver sulfide. If the specimen contains pores or cracks,
the base in order to provide a more visible image. A glossy
hydrogen sulfide gas may become entrapped in these openings emulsion is preferred to a matte emulsion if image sharpness is
and may produce a brown color on the paper which may be
important; the problem is that a glossy emulsion may slide on
incorrectly interpreted as a gross sulfide segregate. the steel surface and cause blurring.Afibre base is preferred to
a resin coated base because the fibre base tends to better
6.3 If air is entrapped between the contacting paper and
conform to the steel surface; in addition it has less tendency to
specimen, and is not removed, a white spot may be produced
slip when smoothing the paper over the steel surface. Note that
on the print. Air entrapment must be quickly removed by the
photo paper for digital photo printing contains no silver halide
use of a rubber squeegee or roller to move bubbles to the edge
emulsion and is not suitable for sulfur printing. The advantage
of the specimen.
of resin coated photographic paper, over fibre base paper, is
6.4 Image blurring may result from movement of the paper
that the paper base is sealed from contact with the dilute acid,
during contact.
the rapid fixer, and the water during washing; hence the
6.5 Specimens with low sulfur contents are often pre-etched processingtime,includingdryingtime,ismuchless,especially
before printing to expose more sulfides and enhance the image. if double weight paper is used. Photographic paper is available
E1180 − 08 (2021)
in cut sheets and rolls of various widths. Cut sheets are ideal if 10.2 The number, orientation, and location of specimens
the specimen size matches the sheet size. Roll dispensed paper may be subject to producer-purchaser agreement.
can be fed from a “safe” box and cut as needed. The paper
10.3 Specimens should be cut in a region away from any
sheet should be 12 mm to 20 mm larger than the specimen
effects from hot shearing or burning; unlike macroetching, the
around the perimeter of the specimen. If the overhang of the
sulfur print appearance is not affected by being within the heat
paper is too great then the paper will not lie tight to the edge
affected zone (HAZ) which results from the torch cutting of
of the specimen.
cold steel.
8.2 Technical or reagent grade acids, sulfuric acid, acetic
10.4 Specimens can be thin enough for ease of han
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...