Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Glove Effects on Wearer Finger Dexterity Using a Modified Pegboard Test

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 The test method is intended to provide a quantitative measurement about the effect of gloves on wearer finger dexterity by comparing the times required to perform a simple task with and without gloves.  
5.2 This test method does not discriminate all glove effects on wearer hand function or apply to all glove types and applications. Additional evaluations or tests representative of the glove use application are recommended to determine the overall impact of gloves on wearer hand function.  
5.2.1 Test Method F2961 provides an assessment for the impact of gloves’ grip by measuring the torque force associated with turning a cylindrical object both with and without gloves.  
5.2.2 Clause 6.2 of BS EN 420 assesses gloved tactility by determining the diameter of a metal pin that can be picked up off a flat, smooth surface and grasped.  
5.3 Results from this test can be influenced by many factors, including relative fit of the gloves and the age, gender, and general health conditions of the subjects. Exercise care when comparing the results using different subjects.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method is used for evaluating finger dexterity while wearing gloves.  
1.1.1 This test method covers procedures in which the wearer picks up small objects between the thumb and index finger.  
1.2 This test method is suitable for evaluating gloves and other forms of hand protection that allow the wearer to pick up small objects between their thumb and index finger.  
1.3 This test method does not address all effects of glove use on hand function. Other methods should be considered to evaluate the effects of gloves on grip, tactility, and other hand functions of interest.
Note 1: This test method may not apply to all glove types or applications.  
1.4 The values stated in SI units or in other units shall be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system must be used independently of the other, without combining values in any way.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-May-2023
Drafting Committee
F23.60 - Human Factors

Relations

Effective Date
01-Jul-2014
Effective Date
01-Jul-2013
Effective Date
01-Feb-2011
Effective Date
10-Jul-2003
Effective Date
10-Jun-2001
Effective Date
10-Jun-2001

Overview

ASTM F2010/F2010M-18(2023), titled Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Glove Effects on Wearer Finger Dexterity Using a Modified Pegboard Test, provides a standardized approach for quantitatively measuring how gloves impact the finger dexterity of users. Developed by ASTM, this international test method compares the time required to perform a specific dexterity task both with and without gloves, offering valuable data for manufacturers, safety professionals, and end users evaluating hand protection performance.

The primary objective is to support consistent glove assessment through a repeatable, objective test method that helps organizations select appropriate gloves for tasks requiring fine motor skills and manipulate small objects.

Key Topics

  • Finger Dexterity Measurement: The method uses a modified pegboard test, where participants must transfer small pegs using their thumb and index finger-both with and without gloves. The performance time difference quantitatively reflects the glove’s effect on dexterity.
  • Applicability: This standard is suitable for evaluating most glove types or other hand protective equipment that allows the wearer to pick up small objects, specifically focusing on activities that require fine finger movement.
  • Test Variables: Results may vary depending on several factors, including glove fit, subject demographics (such as age, gender, and hand size), and subject health conditions. Thus, consistent care in subject selection and fit determination is necessary.
  • Complementary Assessments: The test does not account for all impacts on hand function. For a comprehensive evaluation, organizations are encouraged to use additional methods, such as:
    • Grip Assessment: ASTM F2961 evaluates glove impact on grip strength and torque using a cylindrical object.
    • Tactility Assessment: BS EN 420, clause 6.2, examines gloved tactility by determining the smallest metal pin diameter that can be picked up from a smooth surface.

Applications

  • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Selection: Vital for employers and safety managers when choosing gloves for roles where hand dexterity is crucial, such as precise assembly work, laboratory tasks, emergency response, and electronics manufacturing.
  • Glove Performance Validation: Assists glove manufacturers in substantiating product claims regarding dexterity and in product development or quality assurance processes.
  • Comparative Evaluation: Enables direct comparison of various glove designs, sizes, or materials under controlled conditions to assess which options best preserve manual dexterity.
  • Workplace Safety Compliance: Supports hazard assessments and compliance documentation for industries regulated by occupational health and safety standards.

Related Standards

  • ASTM F1494: Terminology Relating to Protective Clothing, providing essential definitions for terms used across protective equipment standards.
  • ASTM F2961: Test Method for Characterizing Gripping Performance of Gloves Using a Torque Meter, enabling further evaluation of glove influences on grip.
  • BS EN 420: Protective Gloves-General Requirements and Test Methods; Clause 6.2 addresses tactility testing through pin pickup capability.
  • ISO/IEC Standards: Organizations may reference related international standards for harmonized best practices in PPE evaluation.

Keywords: finger dexterity, gloves, hand protection, pegboard test, ASTM F2010, PPE, occupational safety, glove evaluation, dexterity measurement, protective clothing.

Buy Documents

Standard

ASTM F2010/F2010M-18(2023) - Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Glove Effects on Wearer Finger Dexterity Using a Modified Pegboard Test

English language (3 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

NSF International

Global independent organization facilitating standards development and certification.

ANAB United States Verified

CIS Institut d.o.o.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) certification body. Notified Body NB-2890 for EU Regulation 2016/425 PPE.

SA Slovenia Verified

Kiwa BDA Testing

Building and construction product certification.

RVA Netherlands Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

ASTM F2010/F2010M-18(2023) is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Glove Effects on Wearer Finger Dexterity Using a Modified Pegboard Test". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 The test method is intended to provide a quantitative measurement about the effect of gloves on wearer finger dexterity by comparing the times required to perform a simple task with and without gloves. 5.2 This test method does not discriminate all glove effects on wearer hand function or apply to all glove types and applications. Additional evaluations or tests representative of the glove use application are recommended to determine the overall impact of gloves on wearer hand function. 5.2.1 Test Method F2961 provides an assessment for the impact of gloves’ grip by measuring the torque force associated with turning a cylindrical object both with and without gloves. 5.2.2 Clause 6.2 of BS EN 420 assesses gloved tactility by determining the diameter of a metal pin that can be picked up off a flat, smooth surface and grasped. 5.3 Results from this test can be influenced by many factors, including relative fit of the gloves and the age, gender, and general health conditions of the subjects. Exercise care when comparing the results using different subjects. SCOPE 1.1 This test method is used for evaluating finger dexterity while wearing gloves. 1.1.1 This test method covers procedures in which the wearer picks up small objects between the thumb and index finger. 1.2 This test method is suitable for evaluating gloves and other forms of hand protection that allow the wearer to pick up small objects between their thumb and index finger. 1.3 This test method does not address all effects of glove use on hand function. Other methods should be considered to evaluate the effects of gloves on grip, tactility, and other hand functions of interest. Note 1: This test method may not apply to all glove types or applications. 1.4 The values stated in SI units or in other units shall be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system must be used independently of the other, without combining values in any way. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 The test method is intended to provide a quantitative measurement about the effect of gloves on wearer finger dexterity by comparing the times required to perform a simple task with and without gloves. 5.2 This test method does not discriminate all glove effects on wearer hand function or apply to all glove types and applications. Additional evaluations or tests representative of the glove use application are recommended to determine the overall impact of gloves on wearer hand function. 5.2.1 Test Method F2961 provides an assessment for the impact of gloves’ grip by measuring the torque force associated with turning a cylindrical object both with and without gloves. 5.2.2 Clause 6.2 of BS EN 420 assesses gloved tactility by determining the diameter of a metal pin that can be picked up off a flat, smooth surface and grasped. 5.3 Results from this test can be influenced by many factors, including relative fit of the gloves and the age, gender, and general health conditions of the subjects. Exercise care when comparing the results using different subjects. SCOPE 1.1 This test method is used for evaluating finger dexterity while wearing gloves. 1.1.1 This test method covers procedures in which the wearer picks up small objects between the thumb and index finger. 1.2 This test method is suitable for evaluating gloves and other forms of hand protection that allow the wearer to pick up small objects between their thumb and index finger. 1.3 This test method does not address all effects of glove use on hand function. Other methods should be considered to evaluate the effects of gloves on grip, tactility, and other hand functions of interest. Note 1: This test method may not apply to all glove types or applications. 1.4 The values stated in SI units or in other units shall be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system must be used independently of the other, without combining values in any way. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

ASTM F2010/F2010M-18(2023) is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 13.180 - Ergonomics. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ASTM F2010/F2010M-18(2023) has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM F2961-14, ASTM F1494-13, ASTM F1494-03(2011), ASTM F1494-03, ASTM F1494-01, ASTM F1494-99. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ASTM F2010/F2010M-18(2023) is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: F2010/F2010M − 18 (Reapproved 2023)
Standard Test Method for
Evaluation of Glove Effects on Wearer Finger Dexterity
Using a Modified Pegboard Test
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F2010/F2010M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year
of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.
A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.1 This test method is used for evaluating finger dexterity
F1494 Terminology Relating to Protective Clothing
while wearing gloves.
F2961 Test Method for Characterizing Gripping Perfor-
1.1.1 This test method covers procedures in which the
mance of Gloves Using a Torque Meter
wearer picks up small objects between the thumb and index
finger.
2.2 BSI Standard:
BS EN 420 Protective Gloves—General Requirements and
1.2 This test method is suitable for evaluating gloves and
Test Methods
other forms of hand protection that allow the wearer to pick up
small objects between their thumb and index finger.
3. Terminology
1.3 This test method does not address all effects of glove use
3.1 Definitions:
on hand function. Other methods should be considered to
3.1.1 dexterity, n—a hand function referring to the ability of
evaluate the effects of gloves on grip, tactility, and other hand
the individual to manipulate objects with their hands.
functions of interest.
3.1.1.1 Discussion—Dexterity may be classified as requir-
NOTE 1—This test method may not apply to all glove types or ing fine motor skills in which relatively small objects are
applications.
manipulated, or those involving gross motor skills in which
relatively large objects are handled.
1.4 The values stated in SI units or in other units shall be
regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each
3.1.2 glove, n—an item of protective clothing designed and
system must be used independently of the other, without
constructed for protecting the hand and wrist.
combining values in any way.
3.1.3 hand function, n—the relative motion and manipula-
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the tive abilities of the hand.
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
3.1.3.1 Discussion—In this test method, the effect of gloves
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
on a specific hand function, dexterity, is evaluated.
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
3.1.4 protective clothing, n—a product which is designed
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
and constructed for the purpose of isolating parts of the body
1.6 This international standard was developed in accor-
from a potential hazard.
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
3.1.4.1 Discussion—In this test method, gloves are evalu-
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
ated to determine the effect on the hand function of the wearer.
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical 3.1.5 For definitions of other protective clothing-related
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. terms used in this test method, refer to Terminology F1494.
1 2
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F23 on Personal For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Protective Clothing and Equipment and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
F23.60 on Human Factors. Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
Current edition approved June 1, 2023. Published June 2023. Originally the ASTM website.
approved in 2000. Last previous edition approved in 2018 as F2010/F2010M – 18. Available from British Standards Institution (BSI), 389 Chiswick High Rd.,
DOI: 10.1520/F2010_F2010M-18R23. London W4 4AL, U.K., http://www.bsigroup.com.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
F2010/F2010M − 18 (2023)
4. Summary of Test Method 7.2 If the specific glove being evaluated is offered in one
size, test six pairs of gloves using the one available size, and
4.1 The time required for a test subject to place pegs into a
select test subjects of varying hand dimensions in terms of
pegboard is measured without gloves and then later while
hand width and length.
wearing gloves. The percentage difference in the times required
to perform the task while wearing gloves, as compared to not 7.3 Test each glove in new, as-distributed condition. Do not
wearing the gloves, is reported and is used to indicate the apply special softening treatments to gloves prior to tests.
effects of the gloves on wearer finger dexterity.
8. Test Preparation
5. Significance and Use
8.1 Evaluate each pair of gloves with a separate test subject.
5.1 The test method is intended to provide a quantitative
8.1.1 Use equal numbers of male and female subjects.
measurement about the effect of gloves on wearer finger
8.2 Choose gloves that provide a fit according to the
dexterity by comparing the times required to perform a simple
manufacturer’s recommended sizing guidelines, where such
task with and without gloves.
size guidelines are provided. Otherwise, allow the test subject
5.2 This test method does not discriminate all glove effects
to choose the gloves that provide the best fit among the
on wearer hand function or apply to all glove types and
available sizes provided by the manufacturer.
applications. Additional evaluations or tests representative of
NOTE 3—Different types of sizing guidelines are available from glove
the glove use application are recommended to determine the
manufacturers that depend on the type of glove and the number of glove
overall impact of gloves on wearer hand function.
layers in the glove design. Some glove systems are based on hand
5.2.1 Test Method F2961 provides an assessment for the
measurements, while others do not have any associated hand dimensions.
impact of gloves’ grip by measuring the torque force associated
8.3 Familiarize test subjects with the test apparatus and
with turning a cylindrical object both with and without gloves.
procedure by having test subjects practice the test three times
5.2.2 Clause 6.2 of BS EN 420 assesses gloved tactility by
before conducting an actual test, but not on the same day as the
determining the diameter of a metal pin that can be picked up
actual test. Each test subject should use their dominant hand in
off a flat, smooth surface and grasped.
picking up pegs.
5.3 Results from this test can be influenced by many factors,
8.4 Use test subjects that have a baseline dexterity time
including relative fit of the gloves and the age, gender, and
between 25 s and 45 s.
general health conditions of the subjects. Exercise care when
8.5 Test subjects need to have vision that is correctable to at
comparing the results using different subjects.
least 20/20.
6. Apparatus
9. Procedure
6.1 Test Apparatus—A pegboard apparatus consisting
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...