SIST EN IEC 31010:2019

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-oktober-2019
Nadomešča:
SIST EN 31010:2010
SIST ISO/IEC 31010:2011
Obvladovanje tveganja - Tehnike ocenjevanja tveganja (IEC 31010:2019)
Risk management - Risk assessment techniques (IEC 31010:2019)
Risikomanagement - Verfahren zur Risikobeurteilung (IEC 31010:2019)
Gestion des risques - Techniques d'évaluation des risques (IEC 31010:2019)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN IEC 31010:2019
ICS:
03.100.01 Organizacija in vodenje Company organization and
podjetja na splošno management in general
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EUROPEAN STANDARD EN IEC 31010

NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
August 2019
ICS 03.100.01 Supersedes EN 31010:2010 and all of its amendments
and corrigenda (if any)
English Version
Risk management - Risk assessment techniques
(IEC 31010:2019)
Management du risque - Techniques d'appréciation du Risikomanagement - Verfahren zur Risikobeurteilung
risque (IEC 31010:2019)
(IEC 31010:2019)
This European Standard was approved by CENELEC on 2019-07-18. CENELEC members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC
Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.
Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC
Management Centre or to any CENELEC member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation
under the responsibility of a CENELEC member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has the
same status as the official versions.
CENELEC members are the national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic,
Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey and the United Kingdom.

European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization
Comité Européen de Normalisation Electrotechnique
Europäisches Komitee für Elektrotechnische Normung
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2019 CENELEC All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CENELEC Members.
Ref. No. EN IEC 31010:2019 E
European foreword
The text of document 56/1837/FDIS, future edition 2 of IEC 31010, prepared by IEC/TC 56
"Dependability" was submitted to the IEC-CENELEC parallel vote and approved by CENELEC as
The following dates are fixed:
• latest date by which the document has to be implemented at national (dop) 2020-04-18
level by publication of an identical national standard or by endorsement
• latest date by which the national standards conflicting with the (dow) 2022-07-18
document have to be withdrawn
This document supersedes EN 31010:2010.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CENELEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.

Endorsement notice
The text of the International Standard IEC 31010:2019 was approved by CENELEC as a European
Standard without any modification.

In the official version, for Bibliography, the following notes have to be added for the standards
indicated:
IEC 62740 NOTE Harmonized as EN 62740
IEC 60812 NOTE Harmonized as EN IEC 60812
IEC 61882 NOTE Harmonized as EN 61882
ISO 22000 NOTE Harmonized as EN ISO 22000
IEC 61508 (series) NOTE Harmonized as EN 61508 (series)
IEC 61511 (series) NOTE Harmonized as EN 61511 (series)
ISO 22301 NOTE Harmonized as EN ISO 22301
IEC 62502 NOTE Harmonized as EN 62502
IEC 62508 NOTE Harmonized as EN 62508
IEC 61165 NOTE Harmonized as EN 61165
IEC 60300-3-11 NOTE Harmonized as EN 60300-3-11

Annex ZA
(normative)
Normative references to international publications
with their corresponding European publications
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments)
applies.
NOTE 1  Where an International Publication has been modified by common modifications, indicated by (mod), the relevant
EN/HD applies.
NOTE 2  Up-to-date information on the latest versions of the European Standards listed in this annex is available here:
www.cenelec.eu.
Publication Year Title EN/HD Year
ISO 31000 2018 Risk management_- Guidelines - -
ISO Guide 73 2009 Risk management_- Vocabulary - -

IEC 31010
Edition 2.0 2019-06
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD
NORME
INTERNATIONALE
colour
inside
Risk management – Risk assessment techniques

Management du risque – Techniques d'appréciation du risque

INTERNATIONAL
ELECTROTECHNICAL
COMMISSION
COMMISSION
ELECTROTECHNIQUE
INTERNATIONALE
ICS 03.100.01 ISBN 978-2-8322-6989-3

– 2 – IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019
CONTENTS
FOREWORD . 6
INTRODUCTION . 8
1 Scope . 9
2 Normative references . 9
3 Terms and definitions . 9
4 Core concepts . 10
4.1 Uncertainty . 10
4.2 Risk . 11
5 Uses of risk assessment techniques . 11
6 Implementing risk assessment . 12
6.1 Plan the assessment . 12
6.1.1 Define purpose and scope of the assessment . 12
6.1.2 Understand the context . 13
6.1.3 Engage with stakeholders . 13
6.1.4 Define objectives . 13
6.1.5 Consider human, organizational and social factors . 13
6.1.6 Review criteria for decisions . 14
6.2 Manage information and develop models . 16
6.2.1 General . 16
6.2.2 Collecting information . 16
6.2.3 Analysing data . 16
6.2.4 Developing and applying models . 17
6.3 Apply risk assessment techniques. 18
6.3.1 Overview . 18
6.3.2 Identifying risk . 19
6.3.3 Determining sources, causes and drivers of risk . 19
6.3.4 Investigating the effectiveness of existing controls . 20
6.3.5 Understanding consequences, and likelihood . 20
6.3.6 Analysing interactions and dependencies . 22
6.3.7 Understanding measures of risk . 22
6.4 Review the analysis . 25
6.4.1 Verifying and validating results . 25
6.4.2 Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis . 25
6.4.3 Monitoring and review . 26
6.5 Apply results to support decisions . 26
6.5.1 Overview . 26
6.5.2 Decisions about the significance of risk . 27
6.5.3 Decisions that involve selecting between options . 27
6.6 Record and report risk assessment process and outcomes . 28
7 Selecting risk assessment techniques. 28
7.1 General . 28
7.2 Selecting techniques . 29
Annex A (informative) Categorization of techniques . 31
A.1 Introduction to categorization of techniques . 31
A.2 Application of categorization of techniques . 31
A.3 Use of techniques during the ISO 31000 process . 37

IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019 – 3 –
Annex B (informative) Description of techniques . 40
B.1 Techniques for eliciting views from stakeholders and experts. 40
B.1.1 General . 40
B.1.2 Brainstorming . 40
B.1.3 Delphi technique . 42
B.1.4 Nominal group technique . 43
B.1.5 Structured or semi-structured interviews . 44
B.1.6 Surveys . 45
B.2 Techniques for identifying risk. 46
B.2.1 General . 46
B.2.2 Checklists, classifications and taxonomies . 47
B.2.3 Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and failure modes, effects
and criticality analysis (FMECA) . 49
B.2.4 Hazard and operability (HAZOP) studies . 50
B.2.5 Scenario analysis . 52
B.2.6 Structured what if technique (SWIFT) . 54
B.3 Techniques for determining sources, causes and drivers of risk . 55
B.3.1 General . 55
B.3.2 Cindynic approach . 56
B.3.3 Ishikawa analysis (fishbone) method . 58
B.4 Techniques for analysing controls . 60
B.4.1 General . 60
B.4.2 Bow tie analysis . 60
B.4.3 Hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) . 62
B.4.4 Layers of protection analysis (LOPA) . 64
B.5 Techniques for understanding consequences and likelihood . 66
B.5.1 General . 66
B.5.2 Bayesian analysis . 66
B.5.3 Bayesian networks and influence diagrams . 68
B.5.4 Business impact analysis (BIA) . 70
B.5.5 Cause-consequence analysis (CCA) . 72
B.5.6 Event tree analysis (ETA) . 74
B.5.7 Fault tree analysis (FTA) . 76
B.5.8 Human reliability analysis (HRA) . 78
B.5.9 Markov analysis . 79
B.5.10 Monte Carlo simulation . 81
B.5.11 Privacy impact analysis (PIA) / data protection impact analysis (DPIA) . 83
B.6 Techniques for analysing dependencies and interactions . 85
B.6.1 Causal mapping . 85
B.6.2 Cross impact analysis . 87
B.7 Techniques that provide a measure of risk . 89
B.7.1 Toxicological risk assessment. 89
B.7.2 Value at risk (VaR) . 91
B.7.3 Conditional value at risk (CVaR) or expected shortfall (ES) . 93
B.8 Techniques for evaluating the significance of risk . 94
B.8.1 General . 94
B.8.2 As low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) and so far as is reasonably
practicable (SFAIRP) . 94

– 4 – IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019
B.8.3 Frequency-number (F-N) diagrams . 96
B.8.4 Pareto charts . 98
B.8.5 Reliability centred maintenance (RCM) . 100
B.8.6 Risk indices . 102
B.9 Techniques for selecting between options . 103
B.9.1 General . 103
B.9.2 Cost/benefit analysis (CBA) . 104
B.9.3 Decision tree analysis . 106
B.9.4 Game theory . 107
B.9.5 Multi-criteria analysis (MCA) . 109
B.10 Techniques for recording and reporting . 111
B.10.1 General . 111
B.10.2 Risk registers . 112
B.10.3 Consequence/likelihood matrix (risk matrix or heat map) . 113
B.10.4 S-curves . 117
Bibliography . 119

Figure A.1 – Application of techniques in the ISO 31000 risk management process [3] . 37
Figure B.1 – Example Ishikawa (fishbone) diagram . 59
Figure B.2 – Example of Bowtie . 61
Figure B.3 – A Bayesian network showing a simplified version of a real ecological
problem: modelling native fish populations in Victoria, Australia . 69
Figure B.4 – Example of cause-consequence diagram . 73
Figure B.5 – Example of event tree analysis . 75
Figure B.6 – Example of fault tree . 77
Figure B.7 – Example of Markov diagram . 80
Figure B.8 – Example of dose response curve . 89
Figure B.9 – Distribution of value . 91
Figure B.10 – Detail of loss region VaR values . 91
Figure B.11 – VaR and CVaR for possible loss portfolio . 93
Figure B.12 – ALARP diagram . 95
Figure B.13 – Sample F-N diagram . 97
Figure B.14 – Example of a Pareto chart . 98
Figure B.15 – Part example of table defining consequence scales . 114
Figure B.16 – Part example of a likelihood scale . 114
Figure B.17 – Example of consequence/likelihood matrix . 115
Figure B.18 – Probability distribution function and cumulative distribution function. 117

Table A.1 – Characteristics of techniques . 31
Table A.2 – Techniques and indicative characteristics . 32
Table A.3 – Applicability of techniques to the ISO 31000 process . 38
Table B.1 – Examples of basic guidewords and their generic meanings . 51

IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019 – 5 –
Table B.2 – Table of deficits for each stakeholder . 57
Table B.3 – Table of dissonances between stakeholders . 57
Table B.4 – Example of Markov matrix . 80
Table B.5 – Examples of systems to which Markov analysis can be applied . 81
Table B.6 – An example of RCM task selection . 101
Table B.7 – Example of a game matrix . 108

– 6 – IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION
____________
RISK MANAGEMENT –
RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES
FOREWORD
1) The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is a worldwide organization for standardization comprising
all national electrotechnical committees (IEC National Committees). The object of IEC is to promote international
co-operation on all questions concerning standardization in the electrical and electronic fields. To this end and
in addition to other activities, IEC publishes International Standards, Technical Specifications, Technical Reports,
Publicly Available Specifications (PAS) and Guides (hereafter referred to as "IEC Publication(s)"). Their
preparation is entrusted to technical committees; any IEC National Committee interested in the subject dealt with
may participate in this preparatory work. International, governmental and non-governmental organizations liaising
with the IEC also participate in this preparation. IEC collaborates closely with the International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) in accordance with conditions determined by agreement between the two organizations.
2) The formal decisions or agreements of IEC on technical matters express, as nearly as possible, an international
consensus of opinion on the relevant subjects since each technical committee has representation from all
interested IEC National Committees.
3) IEC Publications have the form of recommendations for international use and are accepted by IEC National
Committees in that sense. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure that the technical content of IEC
Publications is accurate, IEC cannot be held responsible for the way in which they are used or for any
misinterpretation by any end user.
4) In order to promote international uniformity, IEC National Committees undertake to apply IEC Publications
transparently to the maximum extent possible in their national and regional publications. Any divergence between
any IEC Publication and the corresponding national or regional publication shall be clearly indicated in the latter.
5) IEC itself does not provide any attestation of conformity. Independent certification bodies provide conformity
assessment services and, in some areas, access to IEC marks of conformity. IEC is not responsible for any
services carried out by independent certification bodies.
6) All users should ensure that they have the latest edition of this publication.
7) No liability shall attach to IEC or its directors, employees, servants or agents including individual experts and
members of its technical committees and IEC National Committees for any personal injury, property damage or
other damage of any nature whatsoever, whether direct or indirect, or for costs (including legal fees) and
expenses arising out of the publication, use of, or reliance upon, this IEC Publication or any other IEC
Publications.
8) Attention is drawn to the Normative references cited in this publication. Use of the referenced publications is
indispensable for the correct application of this publication.
9) Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this IEC Publication may be the subject of patent
rights. IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
International Standard IEC 31010 has been prepared by IEC technical committee 56:
Dependability, in co-operation with ISO technical committee 262: Risk management.
It is published as a double logo standard.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2009. This edition
constitutes a technical revision.
This edition includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous
edition:
• more detail is given on the process of planning, implementing, verifying and validating the
use of the techniques;
• the number and range of application of the techniques has been increased;
• the concepts covered in ISO 31000 are no longer repeated in this standard.

IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019 – 7 –
The text of this International Standard is based on the following documents of IEC:
FDIS Report on voting
56/1837/FDIS 56/1845/RVD
Full information on the voting for the approval of this International Standard can be found in the
report on voting indicated in the above table. In ISO, the standard has been approved by 44 P
members out of 46 having cast a vote.
This document has been drafted in accordance with the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The committee has decided that the contents of this document will remain unchanged until the
stability date indicated on the IEC website under "http://webstore.iec.ch" in the data related to
the specific document. At this date, the document will be
• reconfirmed,
• withdrawn,
• replaced by a revised edition, or
• amended.
IMPORTANT – The 'colour inside' logo on the cover page of this publication indicates
that it contains colours which are considered to be useful for the correct understanding
of its contents. Users should therefore print this document using a colour printer.

– 8 – IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019
INTRODUCTION
This document provides guidance on the selection and application of various techniques that
can be used to help improve the way uncertainty is taken into account and to help understand
risk.
The techniques are used:
• where further understanding is required about what risk exists or about a particular risk;
• within a decision where a range of options each involving risk need to be compared or
optimized;
• within a risk management process leading to actions to treat risk.
The techniques are used within the risk assessment steps of identifying, analysing and
evaluating risk as described in ISO 31000, and more generally whenever there is a need to
understand uncertainty and its effects.
The techniques described in this document can be used in a wide range of settings, however
the majority originated in the technical domain. Some techniques are similar in concept but
have different names and methodologies that reflect the history of their development in different
sectors. Techniques have evolved over time and continue to evolve, and many can be used in
a broad range of situations outside their original application. Techniques can be adapted,
combined and applied in new ways or extended to satisfy current and future needs.
This document is an introduction to selected techniques and compares their possible
applications, benefits and limitations. It also provides references to sources of more detailed
information.
The potential audience for this document is:
• anyone involved in assessing or managing risk;
• people who are involved in developing guidance that sets out how risk is to be assessed in
specific contexts;
• people who need to make decisions where there is uncertainty including:
– those who commission or evaluate risk assessments,
– those who need to understand the outcomes of assessments, and
– those who have to choose assessment techniques to meet particular needs.
Organizations that are required to conduct risk assessments for compliance or conformance
purposes would benefit from using appropriate formal and standardized risk assessment
techniques.
IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019 – 9 –
RISK MANAGEMENT –
RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES
1 Scope
This International Standard provides guidance on the selection and application of techniques
for assessing risk in a wide range of situations. The techniques are used to assist in making
decisions where there is uncertainty, to provide information about particular risks and as part
of a process for managing risk. The document provides summaries of a range of techniques,
with references to other documents where the techniques are described in more detail.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies.
For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any
amendments) applies.
ISO Guide 73:2009, Risk management – Vocabulary
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management – Guidelines
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 31000:2018,
ISO Guide 73:2009 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following
addresses:
• IEC Electropedia: available at http://www.electropedia.org/
• ISO Online browsing platform: available at http://www.iso.org/obp
3.1
likelihood
chance of something happening
Note 1 to entry: In risk management terminology, the word "likelihood" is used to refer to the chance of something
happening, whether defined, measured or determined objectively or subjectively, qualitatively or quantitatively, and
described using general terms or mathematically (such as a probability or a frequency over a given time period).
Note 2 to entry: The English term "likelihood" does not have a direct equivalent in some languages; instead, the
equivalent of the term "probability" is often used. However, in English, "probability" is often narrowly interpreted as
a mathematical term. Therefore, in risk management terminology, "likelihood" is used with the intent that it should
have the same broad interpretation as the term "probability" has in many languages other than English.
[SOURCE: ISO 31000:2018, 3.7]
3.2
opportunity
combination of circumstances expected to be favourable to objectives
Note 1 to entry: An opportunity is a positive situation in which gain is likely and over which one has a fair level of
control.
– 10 – IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019
Note 2 to entry: An opportunity to one party may pose a threat to another.
Note 3 to entry: Taking or not taking an opportunity are both sources of risk.
3.3
probability
measure of the chance of occurrence expressed as a number between 0 and 1, where 0 is
impossibility and 1 is absolute certainty
Note 1 to entry: See definition 3.1, Note 2 to entry.
3.4
risk driver
driver of risk
factor that has a major influence on risk
3.5
threat
potential source of danger, harm, or other undesirable outcome
Note 1 to entry: A threat is a negative situation in which loss is likely and over which one has relatively little control.
Note 2 to entry: A threat to one party may pose an opportunity to another.
4 Core concepts
4.1 Uncertainty
Uncertainty is a term which embraces many underlying concepts. Many attempts have been
made, and continue to be developed, to categorize types of uncertainty including:
• uncertainty which recognizes the intrinsic variability of some phenomena, and that cannot
be reduced by further research; for example, throwing dice (sometimes referred to as
aleatory uncertainty);
• uncertainty which generally results from a lack of knowledge and that therefore can be
reduced by gathering more data, by refining models, improving sampling techniques, etc.
(sometimes referred to as epistemic uncertainty).
Other commonly recognized forms of uncertainty include:
• linguistic uncertainty, which recognizes the vagueness and ambiguity inherent in spoken
languages;
• decision uncertainty, which has particular relevance to risk management strategies, and
which identifies uncertainty associated with value systems, professional judgement,
company values and societal norms.
Examples of uncertainty include:
• uncertainty as to the truth of assumptions, including presumptions about how people or
systems might behave;
• variability in the parameters on which a decision is to be based;
• uncertainty in the validity or accuracy of models which have been established to make
predictions about the future;
• events (including changes in circumstances or conditions) whose occurrence, character or
consequences are uncertain;
• uncertainty associated with disruptive events;
• the uncertain outcomes of systemic issues, such as shortages of competent staff, that can
have wide ranging impacts which cannot be clearly defined;

IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019 – 11 –
• lack of knowledge which arises when uncertainty is recognized but not fully understood;
• unpredictability;
• uncertainty arising from the limitations of the human mind, for example in understanding
complex data, predicting situations with long-term consequences or making bias-free
judgments.
Not all uncertainty is able to be understood and the significance of uncertainty might be hard or
impossible to define or influence. However, a recognition that uncertainty exists in a specific
context enables early warning systems to be put in place to detect change in a proactive and
timely manner and make arrangements to build resilience to cope with unexpected
circumstances.
4.2 Risk
Risk includes the effects of any of the forms of uncertainty described in 4.1 on objectives. The
uncertainty may lead to positive or negative consequences or both.
Risk is often described in terms of risk sources, potential events, their consequences and their
likelihoods. An event can have multiple causes and lead to multiple consequences.
Consequences can have a number of discrete values, be continuous variables or be unknown.
Consequences may not be discernible or measurable at first, but may accumulate over time.
Sources of risk can include inherent variability, or uncertainties related to a range of factors
including human behaviour and organizational structures or societal influences for which it can
be difficult to predict any particular event that might occur. It follows that risk cannot always be
tabulated easily as a set of events, their consequences and their likelihoods.
Risk assessment techniques aim to help people understand uncertainty and the associated risk
in this broad, complex and diverse context, for the purpose of supporting better-informed
decisions and actions.
5 Uses of risk assessment techniques
The techniques described in this document provide a means to improve understanding of
uncertainty and its implications for decisions and actions.
ISO 31000 describes principles for managing risk and the foundations and organizational
arrangements that enable risk to be managed. It specifies a process that enables risk to be
recognized, understood and modified as necessary, according to criteria that are established
as part of the process. Risk assessment techniques can be applied within this structured
approach which involves establishing context, assessing risk and treating risk, along with
ongoing monitoring, review, communication and consultation, recording and reporting. This
process is illustrated in Figure A.1 which also shows examples of where within the process
techniques can be applied.
In the ISO 31000 process, risk assessment involves identifying risks, analysing them, and using
the understanding gained from the analysis to evaluate risk by drawing conclusions about their
comparative significance in relation to the objectives and performance thresholds of the
organization. This process provides inputs into decisions about whether treatment is required,
priorities for treatment and the actions intended to treat risk. In practice an iterative approach
is applied.
Risk assessment techniques described in this document are used
• where further understanding is required about what risks exist or about a particular risk;
• within a risk management process leading to actions to treat risk;
• within a decision where a range of options each involving risk needs to be compared or
optimized.
– 12 – IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019
In particular, the techniques can be used to:
• provide structured information to support decisions and actions where there is uncertainty;
• clarify the implications of assumptions on the achievement of objectives;
• compare multiple options, systems, technologies or approaches, etc. where there is
multifaceted uncertainty around each option;
• assist in defining realistic strategic and operational objectives;
• help determine an organization's risk criteria, such as risk limits, risk appetite or risk bearing
capacity;
• take risk into account when setting or reviewing priorities;
• recognize and understand risk, including risk that could have extreme outcomes;
• understand which uncertainties matter most to an organization's objectives and provide a
rationale for what should be done about them;
• recognize and exploit opportunities more successfully;
• articulate the factors that contribute to risk and why they are important;
• identify effective and efficient risk treatment actions;
• determine the modifying effect of proposed risk treatments, including any change in the
nature or magnitude of risk;
• communicate about risk and its implications;
• learn from failure and successes in order to improve the way risk is managed;
• demonstrate that regulatory and other requirements have been satisfied.
The way in which risk is assessed depends on the situation's complexity and novelty, and the
level of relevant knowledge and understanding.
• In the simplest case, when there is nothing new or unusual about a situation, risk is well
understood, with no major stakeholder implications or consequences are not significant,
then actions are likely to be decided according to established rules and procedures and
previous assessments of risk.
• For very novel, complex or challenging issues, where there is high uncertainty and little
experience, there is little information on which to base assessment and conventional
techniques of analysis might not be useful or meaningful. This also applies to circumstances
where stakeholders hold strongly divergent views. In these cases, multiple techniques might
be used to gain a partial understanding of risk, with judgements then made in the context of
organizational and societal values, and stakeholder views.
The techniques described in this document have greatest application in situations between
these two extremes where the complexity is moderate and there is some information available
on which to base the assessment.
6 Implementing risk assessment
6.1 Plan the assessment
6.1.1 Define purpose and scope of the assessment
The purpose of the assessment should be established, including identifying the decisions or
actions to which it relates, the decision makers, stakeholders, and the timing and nature of the
output required (for example whether qualitative, semi-quantitative or quantitative information
is required).
IEC 31010:2019  IEC 2019 – 13 –
The scope, depth and level of detail of the assessment should be defined, with a description of
what is included, and excluded. The types of consequence to be included in the assessment
should be defined. Any conditions, assumptions, constraints or necessary resources relevant
to the assessment activity should also be specified.
6.1.2 Understand the context
When undertaking a risk assessment those involved should be aware of the broader
circumstances in which decisions and actions based on their assessment will be made. This
includes understanding the internal and external issues that contribute to the context of the
organization as well as wider societal and environmental aspects. Any relevant context
statement should be reviewed and checked to see that it is current and appropriate.
Understanding the bigger picture is particularly important where there is significant complexity.
6.1.3 Engage with stakeholders
Stakeholders and those who are likely to be able to contribute useful knowledge or relevant
views should be identified and their perspectives considered, whether or not they are included
as participants in the assessment. Appropriate involvement of stakeholders helps ensure that
the information on which risk assessment is based is valid and applicable and that stakeholders
understand the reasons behind decisions. Involvement of stakeholders can:
• provide information that enables the context of the assessment to be understood;
• bring together different areas of knowledge and expertise for more effectively identifying
and understanding risk;
• provide relevant expertise for use of the techniques;
• enable stakeholder interests to be understood and considered;
• provide input to the process of determining whether risk is acceptable particularly when the
stakeholders are impacted;
• fulfil any requirements for people to be informed or consulted;
• obtain support for the outputs and decisions arising from risk assessment;
• identify gaps in knowledge that need to be addressed prior to and/or during risk assessment.
It should be decided how outputs and outcomes of risk assessment are to be reliably, accurately
and transparently communicated to relevant stakeholders.
Techniques for eliciting views from stakeholders and experts are described in Clause B.1.
6.1.4 Define objectives
The objectives of the specific system or process for which risk is to be assessed should be
defined and where practicable documented. This will facilitate identification of risk and
understanding its implications.
To the extent practicable the objectives should be:
• specific to the subject of the assessment;
• measurable either qualitatively or quantitatively;
• achievable within the constra
...