Evaluation of pore size distribution and porosity of solid materials by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption — Part 1: Mercury porosimetry

ISO 15901-1:2016 describes a method for the evaluation of the pore size distribution and the specific surface area of pores in solids by mercury porosimetry according to the method of Ritter and Drake[1][2]. It is a comparative test, usually destructive due to mercury contamination, in which the volume of mercury penetrating a pore or void is determined as a function of an applied hydrostatic pressure, which can be related to a pore diameter. Practical considerations presently limit the maximum applied absolute pressure to about 400 MPa (60 000 psi) corresponding to a minimum equivalent pore diameter of approximately 4 nm. The maximum diameter is limited for samples having a significant depth due to the difference in hydrostatic head of mercury from the top to the bottom of the sample. For the most purposes, this limit can be regarded as 400 µm. The measurements cover inter-particle and intra-particle porosity. In general, without additional information from other methods it is difficult to distinguish between these porosities where they co-exist. The method is suitable for the study of most porous materials non-wettable by mercury. Samples that amalgamate with mercury, such as certain metals, e.g. gold, aluminium, copper, nickel and silver, can be unsuitable with this technique or can require a preliminary passivation. Under the applied pressure some materials are deformed, compacted or destroyed, whereby open pores may be collapsed and closed pores opened. In some cases it may be possible to apply sample compressibility corrections and useful comparative data may still be obtainable. For these reasons, the mercury porosimetry technique is considered to be comparative.

Evaluation de la distribution de taille des pores et la porosité des matériaux solides par porosimétrie à mercure et l'adsorption des gaz — Partie 1: Porosimétrie à mercure

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
03-Apr-2016
Current Stage
9093 - International Standard confirmed
Start Date
22-Sep-2021
Completion Date
12-Feb-2026

Relations

Effective Date
09-Feb-2026
Effective Date
18-Feb-2010

Overview

ISO 15901-1:2016 - Evaluation of pore size distribution and porosity of solid materials by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption - Part 1: Mercury porosimetry specifies a comparative laboratory method for determining pore size distribution, specific pore volume and specific surface area using mercury porosimetry (Ritter and Drake method). The technique measures the volume of mercury intruded into pores as a function of applied hydrostatic pressure and relates pressure to an equivalent pore diameter. Results are generally destructive because of mercury contamination and sample deformation under pressure.

Key topics and technical requirements

  • Measurement principle: Mercury intrusion volume versus applied pressure; conversion to pore diameter.
  • Pore size range: Practical limits correspond to approximately 4 nm to 400 µm (minimum pore diameter set by ~400 MPa maximum pressure; maximum limited by hydrostatic head for deep samples).
  • Apparatus & materials: porosimeter, sample holder and mercury (with reference to JIS K 8572 for mercury).
  • Calibration & performance checks: pressure-signal, volume-signal and vacuum transducer calibration; porosimeter verification.
  • Sample handling & procedures: sampling, sample quantity, pre-treatment, filling the holder, evacuation, mercury filling, measurement sequence, completion and blank/compression corrections.
  • Data evaluation: determination of pore size distribution, specific pore volume, specific surface area, bulk and skeleton densities, and porosity.
  • Limitations & artefacts: method is comparative - mercury-inaccessible pores (< ~4 nm) act as closed pores; amalgamating metals (e.g., gold, aluminium, copper, nickel, silver) may be unsuitable unless passivated; applied pressure can deform or collapse pores (compressibility corrections may be required).
  • Safety & environment: mercury handling is hazardous - Annex B provides handling recommendations; standard warns users to establish appropriate safety practices.

Applications

ISO 15901-1:2016 is used to characterize porous solids where pore geometry and size distribution affect performance. Typical applications include:

  • Catalysts and catalyst supports (surface area and pore volume)
  • Filtration media and membranes
  • Building materials and cements (porosity-related durability)
  • Ceramics, polymers and engineered porous materials
  • Reservoir rock and geological samples
  • Quality control and R&D for materials where macropore/mesopore distributions matter

Who should use this standard

  • QA/QC laboratories and R&D teams in materials science, ceramics, catalysis and construction materials
  • Petrochemical and geological testing labs assessing reservoir rock porosity
  • Instrument manufacturers and service labs validating porosimeter performance
  • Regulatory and standards engineers specifying test methods for product characterization

Related standards

  • ISO 15901-2 / ISO 15901-3 (gas adsorption methods for mesopores and micropores)
  • ISO 14488, ISO 8213 (sampling techniques)
  • ISO 12154 (definitions like skeleton volume)

Keywords: ISO 15901-1, mercury porosimetry, pore size distribution, porosity testing, porosimeter, pore volume, specific surface area, mercury intrusion porosimetry.

Standard

ISO 15901-1:2016 - Evaluation of pore size distribution and porosity of solid materials by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption

English language
19 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

IMP NDT d.o.o.

Non-destructive testing services. Radiography, ultrasonic, magnetic particle, penetrant, visual inspection.

SA Slovenia Verified

Inštitut za kovinske materiale in tehnologije

Institute of Metals and Technology. Materials testing, metallurgical analysis, NDT.

SA Slovenia Verified

Q Techna d.o.o.

NDT and quality assurance specialist. 30+ years experience. NDT personnel certification per ISO 9712, nuclear and thermal power plant inspections, QA/

SA Slovenia Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 15901-1:2016 is a standard published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Its full title is "Evaluation of pore size distribution and porosity of solid materials by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption — Part 1: Mercury porosimetry". This standard covers: ISO 15901-1:2016 describes a method for the evaluation of the pore size distribution and the specific surface area of pores in solids by mercury porosimetry according to the method of Ritter and Drake[1][2]. It is a comparative test, usually destructive due to mercury contamination, in which the volume of mercury penetrating a pore or void is determined as a function of an applied hydrostatic pressure, which can be related to a pore diameter. Practical considerations presently limit the maximum applied absolute pressure to about 400 MPa (60 000 psi) corresponding to a minimum equivalent pore diameter of approximately 4 nm. The maximum diameter is limited for samples having a significant depth due to the difference in hydrostatic head of mercury from the top to the bottom of the sample. For the most purposes, this limit can be regarded as 400 µm. The measurements cover inter-particle and intra-particle porosity. In general, without additional information from other methods it is difficult to distinguish between these porosities where they co-exist. The method is suitable for the study of most porous materials non-wettable by mercury. Samples that amalgamate with mercury, such as certain metals, e.g. gold, aluminium, copper, nickel and silver, can be unsuitable with this technique or can require a preliminary passivation. Under the applied pressure some materials are deformed, compacted or destroyed, whereby open pores may be collapsed and closed pores opened. In some cases it may be possible to apply sample compressibility corrections and useful comparative data may still be obtainable. For these reasons, the mercury porosimetry technique is considered to be comparative.

ISO 15901-1:2016 describes a method for the evaluation of the pore size distribution and the specific surface area of pores in solids by mercury porosimetry according to the method of Ritter and Drake[1][2]. It is a comparative test, usually destructive due to mercury contamination, in which the volume of mercury penetrating a pore or void is determined as a function of an applied hydrostatic pressure, which can be related to a pore diameter. Practical considerations presently limit the maximum applied absolute pressure to about 400 MPa (60 000 psi) corresponding to a minimum equivalent pore diameter of approximately 4 nm. The maximum diameter is limited for samples having a significant depth due to the difference in hydrostatic head of mercury from the top to the bottom of the sample. For the most purposes, this limit can be regarded as 400 µm. The measurements cover inter-particle and intra-particle porosity. In general, without additional information from other methods it is difficult to distinguish between these porosities where they co-exist. The method is suitable for the study of most porous materials non-wettable by mercury. Samples that amalgamate with mercury, such as certain metals, e.g. gold, aluminium, copper, nickel and silver, can be unsuitable with this technique or can require a preliminary passivation. Under the applied pressure some materials are deformed, compacted or destroyed, whereby open pores may be collapsed and closed pores opened. In some cases it may be possible to apply sample compressibility corrections and useful comparative data may still be obtainable. For these reasons, the mercury porosimetry technique is considered to be comparative.

ISO 15901-1:2016 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 19.120 - Particle size analysis. Sieving. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ISO 15901-1:2016 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to EN 12514:2020, ISO 15901-1:2005. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ISO 15901-1:2016 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 15901-1
Second edition
2016-04-01
Evaluation of pore size distribution
and porosity of solid materials
by mercury porosimetry and gas
adsorption —
Part 1:
Mercury porosimetry
Evaluation de la distribution de taille des pores et la porosité des
matériaux solides par porosimétrie à mercure et l’adsorption des gaz —
Partie 1: Porosimétrie à mercure
Reference number
©
ISO 2016
© ISO 2016, Published in Switzerland
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland
Tel. +41 22 749 01 11
Fax +41 22 749 09 47
copyright@iso.org
www.iso.org
ii © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved

Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Symbols and abbreviated terms . 4
5 Principles . 5
6 Apparatus and material . 6
6.1 Sample holder . 6
6.2 Porosimeter . 7
6.3 Mercury . 7
7 Procedures for calibration and performance . 7
7.1 General . 7
7.2 Pressure signal calibration . 7
7.3 Volume signal calibration . 7
7.4 Vacuum transducer calibration . 7
7.5 Verification of porosimeter performance . 8
8 Procedures . 8
8.1 Sampling . 8
8.1.1 Obtaining a test sample . . 8
8.1.2 Quantity of sample . 8
8.2 Method . 9
8.2.1 Sample pre-treatment . 9
8.2.2 Filling of the sample holder and evacuation . 9
8.2.3 Filling the sample holder with mercury . 9
8.2.4 Measurement .10
8.2.5 Completion of test .10
8.2.6 Blank and sample compression correction . .10
9 Evaluation .11
9.1 Determination of the pore size distribution .11
9.2 Determination of the specific pore volume .11
9.3 Determination of the specific surface area .12
9.4 Determination of the bulk and skeleton densities .12
9.5 Determination of the porosity .13
10 Reporting .13
Annex A (informative) Mercury porosimetry analysis results .14
Annex B (informative) Recommendations for the safe handling of mercury .17
Bibliography .19
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity assessment,
as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the
Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
The committee responsible for this document is ISO/TC 24, Particle characterization including sieving,
Subcommittee SC 4, Particle characterization.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 15901-1:2005), which has been technically
revised. It also incorporates the Corrigendum ISO 15901-1:2005/Cor 1:2007.
ISO 15901 consists of the following parts, under the general title Evaluation of pore size distribution and
porosity of solid materials by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption:
— Part 1: Mercury porosimetry
— Part 2: Analysis of mesopores and macropores by gas adsorption
— Part 3: Analysis of micropores by gas adsorption
iv © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved

Introduction
In general, different pores (micro-, meso-, and macropores) may be pictured as either apertures,
channels or cavities within a solid body or as space (i.e. interstices or voids) between solid particles
in a bed, compact or aggregate. Porosity is a term which is often used to indicate the porous nature of
solid material and in this International Standard is more precisely defined as the ratio of the total pore
volume of the accessible pores and voids to the volume of the particulate agglomerate. In addition to
the accessible pores, a solid may contain closed pores which are isolated from the external surface and
into which fluids are not able to penetrate. The characterization of closed pores is not covered in this
International Standard.
Porous materials may take the form of fine or coarse powders, compacts, extrudates, sheets or
monoliths. Their characterization usually involves the determination of the pore size distribution as
well as the total accessible pore volume or porosity. For some purposes it is also necessary to study the
pore shape and interconnectivity and to determine the internal and external specific surface area.
Porous materials have great technological importance, for example in the context of the following:
— controlled drug release;
— catalysis;
— gas separation;
— filtration including sterilization;
— materials technology;
— environmental protection and pollution control;
— natural reservoir rocks;
— building materials;
— polymers and ceramic.
It is well established that the performance of a porous solid (e.g. its strength, reactivity, permeability) is
dependent on its pore structure. Many different methods have been developed for the characterization
of pore structure. In view of the complexity of most porous solids, it is not surprising that the results
obtained are not always in agreement and that no single technique can be relied upon to provide a
complete picture of the pore structure. The choice of the most appropriate method depends on the
application of the porous solid, its chemical and physical nature and the range of pore size.
The most commonly used methods are as follows:
a) Mercury porosimetry, where the pores are filled with mercury under pressure. This method is
suitable for many materials with pores in the approximate diameter range of 0,004 µm to 400 µm.
b) Meso- and macropore analysis by gas adsorption, where the pores are characterized by adsorbing
a gas, such as nitrogen at liquid nitrogen temperature. The method is used for pores in the
approximate diameter range of 0,002 µm to 0,1 µm (2 nm to 100 nm).
c) Micropore analysis by gas adsorption, where the pores are characterized by adsorbing a gas,
such as nitrogen at liquid nitrogen temperature. The method is used for pores in the approximate
diameter range of 0,4 nm to 2 nm.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 15901-1:2016(E)
Evaluation of pore size distribution and porosity of solid
materials by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption —
Part 1:
Mercury porosimetry
WARNING — The use of this International Standard may involve hazardous materials,
operations and equipment. This International Standard does not purport to address all of the
safety problems associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this International
Standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations prior to use.
1 Scope
This International Standard describes a method for the evaluation of the pore size distribution and
the specific surface area of pores in solids by mercury porosimetry according to the method of Ritter
[1][2]
and Drake . It is a comparative test, usually destructive due to mercury contamination, in which
the volume of mercury penetrating a pore or void is determined as a function of an applied hydrostatic
pressure, which can be related to a pore diameter.
Practical considerations presently limit the maximum applied absolute pressure to about 400 MPa
(60 000 psi) corresponding to a minimum equivalent pore diameter of approximately 4 nm. The
maximum diameter is limited for samples having a significant depth due to the difference in hydrostatic
head of mercury from the top to the bottom of the sample. For the most purposes, this limit can be
regarded as 400 µm. The measurements cover inter-particle and intra-particle porosity. In general,
without additional information from other methods it is difficult to distinguish between these porosities
where they co-exist. The method is suitable for the study of most porous materials non-wettable by
mercury. Samples that amalgamate with mercury, such as certain metals, e.g. gold, aluminium, copper,
nickel and silver, can be unsuitable with this technique or can require a preliminary passivation. Under
the applied pressure some materials are deformed, compacted or destroyed, whereby open pores may
be collapsed and closed pores opened. In some cases it may be possible to apply sample compressibility
corrections and useful comparative data may still be obtainable. For these reasons, the mercury
porosimetry technique is considered to be comparative.
2 Normative references
The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are
indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated
references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 3165, Sampling of chemical products for industrial use — Safety in sampling
ISO 14488, Particulate materials — Sampling and sample splitting for the determination of particulate
properties
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
3.1
porosimeter
instrument for measuring pore volume and pore size distribution
3.2
porosimetry
methods for the estimation of pore volume, pore size distribution, and porosity
3.3
porous solid
solid with cavities or channels which are deeper than they are wide
3.4
powder
porous or nonporous solid composed of discrete particles with maximum dimension less than about
1 mm, powders with a particle size below about 1 µm are often referred to as fine powders
3.5
pore
cavity or channel which is deeper than it is wide, otherwise it is part of the material’s roughness
3.6
void
interstice
space between particles, i.e. interparticle pore
3.7
macropore
pore of internal width greater than 50 nm
3.8
mesopore
pore of internal width between 2 nm and 50 nm
3.9
micropore
pore of internal width less than 2 nm
3.10
closed pore
pore totally enclosed by its walls and hence not interconnecting with other pores and not accessible
to fluids
3.11
open pore
pore not totally enclosed by its walls and open to the surface either directly or by interconnecting with
other pores and therefore accessible to fluid
3.12
ink bottle pore
narrow necked open pore
3.13
pore size
internal pore width (for example, the diameter of a cylindrical pore or the distance between the
opposite walls of a slit) which is a representative value of various sizes of vacant space inside a porous
material
3.14
pore volume
volume of open pores unless otherwise stated
2 © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved

3.15
pore diameter
diameter of a pore in a model in which the pores typically are assumed to be cylindrical in shape and
which is calculated from data obtained by a specified procedure
3.16
median pore diameter
diameter that corresponds to the 50th percentile of pore volume, i.e. the diameter for which one half of
the pore volume is found to be in larger pores and one half is found to be in smaller pores
3.17
modal pore diameter
mode
pore diameter of the maximum in a differential pore size distribution curve
3.18
hydraulic pore diameter
average pore diameter, calculated as the ratio of pore volume multiplied by four to pore area.
3.19
bulk volume
volume of powder or solids, including all pores (open and closed) and interstitial spaces between
particles.
3.20
bulk density
ratio of sample mass to bulk volume
3.21
skeleton volume
volume of the sample including the volume of closed pores (if present) but excluding the volumes of
open pores as well as that of void spaces between particles within the bulk sample
[SOURCE: ISO 12154]
3.22
skeleton density
ratio of sample mass to skeleton volume
3.23
apparent volume
total volume of the solid constituents of the sample including closed pores and pores inaccessible or not
detectable by the stated method;
3.24
apparent density
ratio of sample mass to apparent volume
3.25
envelope volume
total volume of the particle, including closed and open pores, but excluding void space between the
individual particles
3.26
envelope density
ratio of sample mass to envelope volume
3.27
porosity
ratio of the volume of the accessible pores and voids to the bulk volume occupied by an amount of the solid
3.28
interparticle porosity
ratio of the volume of void space between the individual particles to the bulk volume of the particles
or powder
3.29
intraparticle porosity
ratio of the volume of open pores inside the individual particles of a particulate or divided solid sample
to the bulk volume occupied by the sample
3.30
surface area
extent of accessible surface area as determined by a given method under stated conditions
3.31
surface tension
work required to increase a surface area divided by that area.
3.32
contact angle
angle at which a liquid/vapour interface meets the surface of a solid material
4 Symbols and abbreviated terms
For the purposes of this document, the following symbols apply.
Symbol Term SI unit Derived and obso- Conversion factors
lete units
P pressure Pa MPa, psia, 1 MPa = 10 Pa
−2
Torr, mmHg 1 psi = 1 lb in = 6 895 Pa
1 Torr = 1 mmHg = 133,32 Pa
−9 −6
1nm = 10 m, 1µm = 10 m,
d pore diameter m nm, µm, Å
p
−10
1 Å = 10 m
t time s h 1 h = 3 600 s
2 −1 2 −1
S specific surface area m ·kg m ·g
intruded volume of
3 3 3 3 3 3 −6 3
V m cm , mm 10 mm = 1 cm = 10 m
Hg
mercury
initial intruded volume of
3 3 3
V m cm , mm
Hg,0
mercury
total intruded volume of
3 3 3
V m cm , mm
Hg,max
mercury
3 −1
mm ·g
3 . −1
V specific pore volume m kg
p
3 −1
cm ·g
−1 −1 −1 −3 −1
γ surface tension of mercury N·m dyne·cm 1 dyne·cm = 10 N·m
−3 −3 −3 3 −3
ρ density of mercury kg·m g·cm 1 g·cm = 10 kg·m
Hg
contact angle of mercury at
Θ rad ° 1° = (π/180) rad
the sample
m mass of the test sample kg g
S
m mass of empty sample holder kg g
SH
mass of sample holder with
m kg g
SH+S
sample
mass of sample holder with
m sample and filled with mer- kg g
SH+S+Hg
cury
4 © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved

Symbol Term SI unit Derived and obso- Conversion factors
lete units
3 3
V bulk volume m cm
B
3 3
V skeleton volume m cm
S
3 3
V volume of sample holder m cm
SH
−3 −3
ρ bulk density kg·m g·cm
B
−3 −3
ρ skeleton density kg·m g·cm
S
ε porosity —
5 Principles
Mercury porosimetry is a widely accepted method for pore size analysis of various materials such as
pharmaceutical tablets, building materials, catalysts and their supports, mainly because it allows pore
size/porosity analysis to be undertaken over a wide range of pore sizes from meso- to macropores with
[1]–[7]
pore widths about 0,004 µm to about 400 µm . In contrast to capillary condensation, where the
pore fluid wets the pore walls (i.e. the contact angle is smaller than 90 degrees), mercury porosimetry
describes a non-wetting situation (i.e. the contact angle is greater than 90 degrees) and therefore
pressure must be applied to force mercury into the pores. Thus, a progressive increase in hydrostatic
pressure is applied to enable the mercury to enter the pores in decreasing order of width. Accordingly,
there is an inverse relationship between the applied pressure, p, and the pore diameter, d , which in the
p
simplest case of cylindrical pores is given by the Washburn equation (see 9.1).
In the application of mercury porosimetry, the volume of mercury entering the pore structure is
measured as the applied pressure is gradually increased. The value V at the applied pressure, p, gives
Hg
the cumulative volume of all available pores of diameter equal to, or greater than, d . The determination
p
may proceed either with the pressure being raised in a step-wise manner and the volume of mercury
intruded measured after an interval of time when equilibrium has been achieved, or by raising the
pressure in a continuous (progressive) manner.
Figure 1 shows two intrusion/extrusion cycles of mercury into a porous powder as a function of
pressure. Region (a) corresponds to a re-arrangement of particles within the powder bed, followed
by intrusion of the interparticle voids (b). Filling of intraparticle pores occurs in the region (c) and
for some materials (reversible) compression is then possible at higher pressures (d). Hysteresis (h)
is observed and extrusion (e) occurs at different pressures than for the intrusion. On completion of a
first intrusion-extrusion cycle, usually some mercury is retained by the sample, thereby preventing the
loop from closing (f). Intrusion-extrusion cycles after the first cycle continue to show hysteresis (g) but
eventually the loop closes, showing that there is no further entrapment of mercury. On most samples,
entrapment is not observed anymore after just the second cycle, which also indicates that hysteresis
and entrapment are essentially of different origin.
Key
1 powder compression
2 interparticle filling
3 intraparticle filling
Y intruded mercury, V
Hg
X hydraulic pressure, lg p
Figure 1 — Characteristic features of mercury porosimetry curves
The hysteresis and entrapment phenomena is undoubtedly important in order to obtain a comprehensive
pore size analysis. Mercury entrapment appears to be caused by the rupture of mercury bridges in pore
constrictions during extrusion from ink-bottle pores. Different mechanisms have been proposed to
[6]–[12]
explain intrusion/extrusion hysteresis . The single pore mechanism implies that hysteresis can
be understood as an intrinsic property of the intrusion/extrusion process due to nucleation barriers
associated with the formation of a vapour-liquid interface during extrusion, or discussed in terms
of differences in advancing and receding contact angles. In contrast, the network models take into
account the ink-bottle and percolation effects in pore networks. It is now generally accepted that pore
blocking effects, which can occur on the intrusion branch, are similar to the percolation effects involved
in the desorption of gases from porous networks. Indeed, the shape of a mercury intrusion/extrusion
[9][10]
hysteresis loop often agrees well with that of the corresponding gas adsorption loop . Thus,
mercury intrusion and the capillary evaporation appear to be based on similar mechanisms. The
pore blocking/percolation effects are dominant in disordered pore networks, and a reliable pore size
distribution can only be calculated from the intrusion branch by applying complex network models,
based on percolation theory. The application of such models also allows one to obtain a limited amount
[11][12].
of structural information from the intrusion/extrusion hysteresis loop
6 Apparatus and material
WARNING — It is important that proper precautions for the protection of laboratory personnel
are taken when mercury is used. Attention is drawn to the relevant regulations and guidance
documents which appertain for the protection of personnel in each of the member countries.
6.1 Sample holder
The sample holder may consist of a vessel with a uniform bore capillary tube through which the sample
can be evacuated and the vessel filled with mercury. The capillary tube is attached to a wider bore
tube in which the test sample is located. If precise measurements are required, the internal volume of
the capillary tube should be between 20 % and 90 % of the expected pore and interparticle volume of
the sample. Since different materials exhibit a wide range of open porosities a number of sample vessel
holders with different tube diameters and vessel volumes is required. A special design of sample holder
is often used with powdered samples to avoid loss of powder during evacuation.
6 © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved

In order to evaluate the porosity and the bulk and skeleton densities, the volume of the sample holder,
including the capillary tube, must be known.
6.2 Porosimeter
An instrument capable of carrying out the test at two sequential measurements, a low pressure test
up to at least 0,2 MPa (30 psi) and a high-pressure test up to the maximum operating pressure of the
porosimeter [circa 400 MPa (60 000 psi)].
The porosimeter may have several ports for high and low pressure operation, or the low pressure test
may be carried out on a separate unit.
Prior to any porosimetry measurement it is necessary to evacuate the sample using a typical rotary
vacuum pump, equipped with a mercury retainer and then to fill the sample holder with mercury to a
given low pressure. A means of generating pressure is necessary to cause intrusion of mercury.
A means of detecting the change in the volume of mercury intruded to a resolution of 1 mm or less is
desirable. This is usually done by measuring the change in capacitance between the mercury column in
the capillary tube and a metal sleeve around the outside of the sample holder.
6.3 Mercury
Mercury in analytical quality should be used for the measurements (at least a mass ratio of
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...