ASTM C267-20
(Test Method)Standard Test Methods for Chemical Resistance of Mortars, Grouts, and Monolithic Surfacings and Polymer Concretes
Standard Test Methods for Chemical Resistance of Mortars, Grouts, and Monolithic Surfacings and Polymer Concretes
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 The results obtained by these test methods should serve as a guide in, but not as the sole basis for, selection of a chemical-resistant material for a particular application. No attempt has been made to incorporate into these test methods all the various factors that may affect the performance of a material when subjected to actual service. The strength values obtained by these test methods should not be used to evaluate the compressive strength of chemical-resistant materials. The appropriate ASTM test method for the specific material should be used for determining and evaluating the compressive strength.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods are intended to evaluate the chemical resistance of resin, silica, silicate, sulfur, and hydraulic materials, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes under anticipated service conditions. These test methods provide for the determination of changes in the following properties of the test specimens and test medium after exposure of the specimens to the medium:
1.1.1 Weight of specimen,
1.1.2 Appearance of specimen,
1.1.3 Appearance of test medium, and
1.1.4 Compressive strength of specimens.
1.2 Test Method A outlines the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate less than 0.0625 in. (1.6 mm) in size. Test Method B covers the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate from 0.0625 to 0.4 in. (1.6 to 1.0 mm) in size. Test Method C is used for systems containing aggregate larger than 0.4 in.
1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 31-Aug-2020
- Technical Committee
- D01 - Paint and Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications
- Drafting Committee
- D01.46 - Industrial Protective Coatings
Relations
- Refers
ASTM C904-01(2018) - Standard Terminology Relating to Chemical-Resistant Nonmetallic Materials - Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Jun-2014
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2014
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2013
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2013
- Refers
ASTM C904-01(2012) - Standard Terminology Relating to Chemical-Resistant Nonmetallic Materials - Effective Date
- 01-Aug-2012
- Effective Date
- 01-Aug-2012
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2011
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2010
- Effective Date
- 01-Jun-2010
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2009
- Refers
ASTM C470/C470M-09 - Standard Specification for Molds for Forming Concrete Test Cylinders Vertically - Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2009
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2009
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2008
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2008
Overview
ASTM C267-20: Standard Test Methods for Chemical Resistance of Mortars, Grouts, and Monolithic Surfacings and Polymer Concretes establishes procedures for evaluating the chemical resistance of a range of nonmetallic materials. These include resin, silica, silicate, sulfur, and hydraulic mortars; grouts; monolithic surfacings; and polymer concretes. The standard, issued by ASTM International, provides guidance for laboratory testing under anticipated service conditions, helping users assess material performance by observing changes in weight, appearance, and compressive strength after chemical exposure.
While these test methods offer a valuable comparative basis for the selection of chemical-resistant materials, results should be used as a guide rather than the sole criterion for material selection. Service performance can be affected by factors not simulated in laboratory conditions.
Key Topics
- Testing Procedures: The standard outlines three main test methods based on aggregate size:
- Test Method A: For aggregate less than 0.0625 in. (1.6 mm)
- Test Method B: For aggregate from 0.0625 to 0.4 in. (1.6 to 1.0 mm)
- Test Method C: For aggregate larger than 0.4 in. (1.0 mm)
- Evaluation Parameters:
- Weight change of specimens after exposure
- Visual assessment of the specimen and test medium
- Change in compressive strength following chemical immersion
- Specimen Preparation: Detailed requirements for mixing, molding, and curing ensure consistent and repeatable results.
- Test Conditions: Emphasizes simulating actual service environments, including temperature control and selection of representative chemical media.
- Reporting Requirements: Specifies comprehensive documentation, including material type, preparation procedures, test conditions, and graphical representation of weight and strength changes.
Applications
ASTM C267-20 supports industries that require durable, chemical-resistant materials in aggressive environments. Typical applications include:
- Construction and Infrastructure: Selection and quality assurance of mortars, grouts, and overlays for floors, tanks, drains, and sumps in chemical plants, wastewater treatment, and industrial facilities.
- Industrial Protective Coatings: Evaluation of polymer concrete and monolithic surfacings used in secondary containment and process plant flooring.
- Maintenance and Repair: Assessment of grouts and mortars for repairing areas exposed to corrosive substances.
- Tile and Brick Setting: Ensuring chemical-resistant brick mortars and tile grouts are suitable for installation in laboratories, food processing, or pharmaceutical facilities.
- Machinery Bases: Verification of machinery grouts under exposure to oils, acids, or solvents.
By providing a standardized approach, this test method helps manufacturers, specifiers, and engineers select appropriate materials, ensure compliance with performance criteria, and improve durability and safety in service.
Related Standards
Several ASTM standards complement ASTM C267-20 by addressing related aspects of chemical-resistant materials:
- ASTM C470/C470M: Specification for molds used in forming concrete test cylinders.
- ASTM C579: Methods for determining compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concrete.
- ASTM C904: Terminology related to chemical-resistant nonmetallic materials.
- ASTM C1312: Laboratory practices for making and conditioning chemical-resistant sulfur polymer cement concrete specimens.
- ASTM E4: Practices for force verification of testing machines.
- ASTM E177 and ASTM E691: Guidance on statistical analysis, precision, and reproducibility in laboratory testing.
Practical Value
Implementing ASTM C267-20 facilitates the scientific evaluation and selection of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, surfacings, and polymer concretes. By following these methods, stakeholders can:
- Validate material suitability for use in aggressive chemical environments.
- Consistently compare products from different suppliers.
- Support regulatory compliance and industry best practices.
- Extend facility service life and reduce maintenance costs by choosing durable materials based on rigorous, reproducible testing.
Keywords: chemical resistance, mortars, grouts, polymer concrete, monolithic surfacings, ASTM C267, industrial flooring, material selection, compressive strength, laboratory testing methods.
Buy Documents
ASTM C267-20 - Standard Test Methods for Chemical Resistance of Mortars, Grouts, and Monolithic Surfacings and Polymer Concretes
REDLINE ASTM C267-20 - Standard Test Methods for Chemical Resistance of Mortars, Grouts, and Monolithic Surfacings and Polymer Concretes
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

ICC Evaluation Service
Building products evaluation and certification.

QAI Laboratories
Building and construction product testing and certification.

Aboma Certification B.V.
Specialized in construction, metal, and transport sectors.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM C267-20 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Test Methods for Chemical Resistance of Mortars, Grouts, and Monolithic Surfacings and Polymer Concretes". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 The results obtained by these test methods should serve as a guide in, but not as the sole basis for, selection of a chemical-resistant material for a particular application. No attempt has been made to incorporate into these test methods all the various factors that may affect the performance of a material when subjected to actual service. The strength values obtained by these test methods should not be used to evaluate the compressive strength of chemical-resistant materials. The appropriate ASTM test method for the specific material should be used for determining and evaluating the compressive strength. SCOPE 1.1 These test methods are intended to evaluate the chemical resistance of resin, silica, silicate, sulfur, and hydraulic materials, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes under anticipated service conditions. These test methods provide for the determination of changes in the following properties of the test specimens and test medium after exposure of the specimens to the medium: 1.1.1 Weight of specimen, 1.1.2 Appearance of specimen, 1.1.3 Appearance of test medium, and 1.1.4 Compressive strength of specimens. 1.2 Test Method A outlines the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate less than 0.0625 in. (1.6 mm) in size. Test Method B covers the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate from 0.0625 to 0.4 in. (1.6 to 1.0 mm) in size. Test Method C is used for systems containing aggregate larger than 0.4 in. 1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 The results obtained by these test methods should serve as a guide in, but not as the sole basis for, selection of a chemical-resistant material for a particular application. No attempt has been made to incorporate into these test methods all the various factors that may affect the performance of a material when subjected to actual service. The strength values obtained by these test methods should not be used to evaluate the compressive strength of chemical-resistant materials. The appropriate ASTM test method for the specific material should be used for determining and evaluating the compressive strength. SCOPE 1.1 These test methods are intended to evaluate the chemical resistance of resin, silica, silicate, sulfur, and hydraulic materials, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes under anticipated service conditions. These test methods provide for the determination of changes in the following properties of the test specimens and test medium after exposure of the specimens to the medium: 1.1.1 Weight of specimen, 1.1.2 Appearance of specimen, 1.1.3 Appearance of test medium, and 1.1.4 Compressive strength of specimens. 1.2 Test Method A outlines the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate less than 0.0625 in. (1.6 mm) in size. Test Method B covers the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate from 0.0625 to 0.4 in. (1.6 to 1.0 mm) in size. Test Method C is used for systems containing aggregate larger than 0.4 in. 1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ASTM C267-20 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 91.100.10 - Cement. Gypsum. Lime. Mortar. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM C267-20 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM C904-01(2018), ASTM E4-14, ASTM E177-14, ASTM E691-13, ASTM E177-13, ASTM C904-01(2012), ASTM C579-01(2012), ASTM E691-11, ASTM E177-10, ASTM E4-10, ASTM E4-09a, ASTM C470/C470M-09, ASTM E4-09, ASTM E4-08, ASTM E177-08. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM C267-20 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: C267 − 20
Standard Test Methods for
Chemical Resistance of Mortars, Grouts, and Monolithic
Surfacings and Polymer Concretes
This standard is issued under the fixed designation C267; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
1.1 These test methods are intended to evaluate the chemi-
2.1 ASTM Standards:
cal resistance of resin, silica, silicate, sulfur, and hydraulic
C470/C470MSpecification for Molds for Forming Concrete
materials, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer con-
Test Cylinders Vertically
cretes under anticipated service conditions.These test methods
C579Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Chemical-
provide for the determination of changes in the following
Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and
propertiesofthetestspecimensandtestmediumafterexposure
Polymer Concretes
of the specimens to the medium:
C904Terminology Relating to Chemical-Resistant Nonme-
1.1.1 Weight of specimen,
tallic Materials
1.1.2 Appearance of specimen,
C1312Practice for Making and Conditioning Chemical-
1.1.3 Appearance of test medium, and
Resistant Sulfur Polymer Cement Concrete Test Speci-
1.1.4 Compressive strength of specimens.
mens in the Laboratory
E4Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines
1.2 Test Method A outlines the testing procedure generally
E177Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in
used for systems containing aggregate less than 0.0625 in. (1.6
ASTM Test Methods
mm) in size. Test Method B covers the testing procedure
generally used for systems containing aggregate from 0.0625 E691Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to
Determine the Precision of a Test Method
to 0.4 in. (1.6 to 1.0 mm) in size. Test Method C is used for
systems containing aggregate larger than 0.4 in.
3. Terminology
1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded
as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms used in these test
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only
methods, see Terminology C904.
and are not considered standard.
4. Significance and Use
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
4.1 The results obtained by these test methods should serve
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
as a guide in, but not as the sole basis for, selection of a
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
chemical-resistant material for a particular application. No
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
attempt has been made to incorporate into these test methods
1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-
all the various factors that may affect the performance of a
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
material when subjected to actual service. The strength values
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
obtained by these test methods should not be used to evaluate
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
the compressive strength of chemical-resistant materials. The
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
appropriateASTM test method for the specific material should
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
be used for determining and evaluating the compressive
strength.
These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on
Paint and Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications and are the direct
responsibility of Subcommittee D01.46 on Industrial Protective Coatings. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved Sept. 1, 2020. Published October 2020. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 1959. Last previous edition approved in 2012 as C267–01 (2012). Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
DOI: 10.1520/C0267-20. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
C267 − 20
5. Apparatus 5.3.3.2 For molds to be used for preparing sulfur polymer
cement concrete specimens, refer to Practice C1312.
5.1 Equipment, capable of weighing materials or specimens
to 60.3% accuracy.
NOTE 2—The material from which the mold is constructed must be
chemically inert and have antistick properties. Polyethylene,
5.2 Equipment for Mixing, consisting of a container of
polypropylene, polytetrafluoroethylene, and metal forms having either a
suitablesize,preferablymadeofcorrosion-resistantmetal,ora
sintered coating of tetrafluoroethylene or a suitable release agent compat-
porcelain pan, and a strong, sturdy spatula or trowel. ible with the material being tested are satisfactory. Because of their
superior heat resistance, only trifluorochloroethylene and tetrafluoroeth-
5.3 Specimen Molds:
ylene mold release agents should be used with sulfur materials.
5.3.1 Test Method A—These molds shall be right cylinder 1
5.4 Weighing Equipment, of adequate capacity. For Method
1 1
6 ⁄32 in. (25 6 0.8 mm) in diameter by 1 6 ⁄32 in. high. The
A, suitable for accurate weighing to 0.001 g.
molds may be constructed in any manner that will allow
formation of a test specimen of the desired size.Typical molds 5.5 Micrometer, suitable for accurate measurement to 0.001
consist of a 1-in. thick, flat plastic sheet in which 1-in. in. (0.03 mm).
diameter, smooth-sided holes have been cut, and to the bottom
5.6 Containers:
of which a ⁄4-in. (6-mm) thick, flat plastic sheet (without
5.6.1 Wide-Mouth Glass Jars, of sufficient capacity, fitted
matching holes) is attached by means of screws or bolts.
with plastic or plastic-lined metal screw caps for low-
Alternately, the molds may consist of sections of round plastic
temperature tests involving media of low volatility.
tubing or pipe, 1 in. in inside diameter and 1 in. long, having
5.6.2 Erlenmeyer Flasks, of sufficient capacity, each fitted
sufficient wall thickness to be rigid and retain dimensional
1 with standard-taper joints and a reflux condenser attachment
stability during the molding operation, and a ⁄4-in. thick, flat
for use with volatile media.
plastic sheet on which one open end of each section can be
rested.Withthelatterstyleofmold,thetubingsegmentmaybe 5.6.3 Containers, as described in 5.6.1 and 5.6.2 having an
sealedwithamaterial,suchascaulkingcompoundorstopcock inert coating on their inner surfaces, or containers of a suitable
grease. For most types of specimens it is satisfactory to simply inert material for use with media which attack glass.
seal one end of the tubing segment with masking tape.
5.7 Constant-Temperature Oven or Liquid Bath, capable of
NOTE 1—For use with sulfur mortars an additional piece of flat plastic maintaining temperature within a range of 64°F (62°C).
1 1
sheet at least ⁄8 in. (3 mm) thick containing a ⁄4-in. (6-mm) hole and a
5.8 Testing Machine, may be of any type of sufficient
section of plastic tubing or pipe 1 in. (25 mm) in diameter by 1 in. high
are required. They are used to form a pouring gate and reservoir in the capacity which will provide the rates of loading prescribed. It
preparation of sulfur mortar specimens.
shallhavebeenverifiedtohaveanaccuracyof1.0%,orbetter,
within twelve months of the time of use in accordance with
5.3.2 Test Method B—Molds for the 2-in. (50-mm) cube
Practices E4. The testing machine shall be equipped with two
specimens shall be tight fitting and leakproof. The sides of the
steel bearing blocks with hardened faces, one of which is a
molds shall be sufficiently rigid to prevent spreading or
spherically seated block that will bear on the top of the
warping.Theinteriorfacesofthemoldsshallbemanufactured
specimen, and the other a plain block that will support the
to ensure plane surfaces with a permissible variation of 0.002
bottom.The size of the bearing block shall be of sufficient size
in. (0.05 mm).The distances between opposite faces shall be 2
1 to contact the entire bearing surface of the specimen. The
6 ⁄16in.(50 60.8mm).Theheightofthemoldsshallbe2 6
1 bearing faces shall not depart from a plane by more than 0.001
⁄16 in. The angle between adjacent interior faces and between
in. (0.025 mm) in any 6-in. (150-mm) diameter circle.
interior faces and the bottom of the mold shall be 90 6 0.5°.
5.3.3 Test Method C:
6. Test Media
5.3.3.1 For polymer concretes other than sulfur polymer
cementconcretes,moldsshallberightcylindersmadeofheavy
6.1 The test media shall consist of the media to which the
gage metal or other rigid nonabsorbent material. The cylinder
chemical-resistant materials are to be exposed in service.
diameter shall be at least four times the nominal maximum
aggregate size in the mix. The minimum cylinder diameter
7. Test Specimens
shall be 2 in. (50 mm). The cylinder height shall be two times
7.1 The number of specimens required is dependent upon
the diameter.The plane of the rim of the mold shall be at right
the number of test media to be employed, the number of
anglestotheaxiswithin0.5°.Themoldshallbeatrightangles
different temperatures at which testing is performed, and the
to the axis within 0.5°. The mold shall not vary from the
frequency of test intervals. The test specimens shall consist of
prescribeddiameterbymorethan ⁄16in.(1.5mm)norfromthe
sets of a minimum of three cylinders for one medium at a
prescribed height by more than ⁄8 in. (3 mm). Molds shall be
singletemperatureandforeachtestinterval.Inadditiononeset
provided with a flat base plate with a means for securing it to
of at least three specimens shall be available for test immedi-
the mold at a right angle to the axis of the cylinder in the
ately following the conditioning period, and other sets of at
instance of reusable metal molds. For molds other than metal,
least three, equivalent to the number of test temperatures, for
amechanicallyattachedsmoothflatmetalorintegrallymolded
the total test period. Calculate the total number of specimens
flat bottom of the same material as the sides shall be used.
required as follows:
Single-use molds shall conform to Specifications C470/
C470M. N 5 n M 3T 3I 1nT1n (1)
~ !
C267 − 20
where: material to remain in the mold until it has set sufficiently to
allow removal without danger of deformation or breakage.
N = number of specimens,
8.1.1.1 Silicate Materials—Some silicates may require cov-
n = number of specimens for a single test,
M = number of media, ering during the curing period.After removal from the molds,
T = number of test temperatures, and
acid-treat the specimens, if required, in accordance with the
I = number of test intervals.
recommendations given by the manufacturer. No other treat-
NOTE 3—For calcium aluminate cements, strength and weight changes
ment shall be permitted. Record the method of treatment in
areanaturalphenomena,withthedegreeofchangebeingdependentupon
13.1.3.
the test conditions involved. Therefore, when conducting chemical resis-
8.1.2 Sulfur Materials:
tance tests on these products, additional sets of control samples should be
8.1.2.1 Sulfur Mortars—Slowly melt a minimum of 2 lb
prepared for testing at each test temperature and each test interval. The
immersion medium for these control samples will be potable water.
(900 g) of the material in a suitable container at a temperature
of 265 to 290°F (130 to 145°C) with constant agitation. Stir to
7.2 Make all specimens for a single determination from a
lift and blend the aggregate without beating air into the melt.
single mix.
Place the piece of plastic sheet containing the ⁄4-in. (6-mm)
7.3 Test Method A—Prepare test specimens to be used in
round hole over the open face of the mold with the hole
accordance with Test Method A as described in 8.1. Test
centered on the face. On top of the piece of plastic sheet and
1 1
specimens shall be right cylinders 1 + ⁄32 in., − ⁄16 in.
surrounding the hole, place a section of plastic tubing or pipe
(25+0.8,−1.6mm)indiameterby1 6 ⁄16in.(25 61.6mm)
1 in. (25 mm) in diameter by 1 in. high. Pour the melted
high. If the faces of the specimen are not flat, smooth, and
material through the hole into the mold and continue to pour
normal to the cylinder axis, they may be sanded, ground, or
until the section of tubing or pipe is completely filled. The
machined to specification. Exercise care that the frictional heat
excessmaterialcontainedintheholeintheplasticsheetactsas
developed during such operations does not damage the speci-
a reservoir to compensate for shrinkage of the material during
mens.
cooling.Allow the specimen to remain in the mold until it has
completely solidified. Upon removal, file, grind, or sand the
7.4 Test Method B—Prepare test specimens to be used in
surface flush, removing the excess material remaining at the
accordance with Test Method B as described in 8.1. Test
1 1 pouring gate.
specimens shall be cubes with dimensions of 2+ ⁄16 in.,− ⁄8
8.1.2.2 Sulfur Polymer Cement Concretes—Prepare speci-
in. (50+1.5,−3.0 mm).
mens in accordance with Practice C1312.
7.5 Test Method C:
8.2 Specimen Preparation for Test Method C:
7.5.1 For polymer concretes other than sulfur concretes,
8.2.1 PolymerConcretesOtherthanSulfurPolymerCement
prepare the test specimens to be used in accordance with 8.2.
Concretes—Preparespecimensinaccordancewith8.1withthe
7.5.1.1 Do not test specimens if any individual diameter of
following additional considerations:
a cylinder differs from any other diameter of the same cylinder
8.2.1.1 The use of vibrators may be required. The type and
by more than 2%.
method of vibrating will be as recommended by the manufac-
7.5.1.2 Neither end of compressive test specimens, when
turer and shall be specified in the test report.
tested,shalldepartfromperpendiculartotheaxisbymorethan
8.2.1.2 Filling and Capping for Cylindrical Resin, Silicate,
0.5° (approximately equivalent to ⁄8in. in 12 in. (3 mm in 300
and Silica Specimens—The top layer may be filled to slightly
mm). Compression test specimens that are not flat within 0.01
below the top edge of the mold. The top surface of the
in. (0.25 mm) shall be sawed, ground, or capped in accordance
specimen shall be finished as much as practicable to a plane
with 8.2.1.2. Determine the diameter used for calculating the
perpendicular to the axis of the specimen. The flatness of the
cross-sectional area of the test specimen to the nearest 0.01 in.
finished specimen shall be within 0.010 in. (0.25 mm). Speci-
(0.25 mm) by averaging two diameters measured at right
mens exceeding this tolerance shall be machined flat or a
angles to each other at about mid-height of the specimen.
capping compound shall be applied.
7.5.2 For preparing sulfur polymer cement concrete test
8.2.1.3 Capping,ifused,shallbemadeasthinaspracticable
specimens, refer to Practice C1312.
and shall be applied before removal of the polymer concrete
from the molds.
8. Preparation of Specimens
8.2.1.4 Ifapolymerpasteormortarisusedforcapping,itis
8.1 Specimen Preparation for Test Methods A and B:
preferablethatthepolymerusedbethesameastheoneusedto
make the specimen. Fillers used may be the fine portion used
8.1.1 Resin, Silicate, and Silica Materials—Mix a sufficient
amountofthecomponentsintheproportionsandinthemanner in the polymer concrete or another mineral powder.
specified by the manufacturer of the materials. Fill the molds 8.2.1.5 For capping in the mold, a suitable capping com-
one-half full. Remove any entrapped air by using a cutting and poundmaybemadefromapolymermortar.Thesurfaceofthe
stabbing motion with a spatula or rounded-end rod. Fill the polymer concrete shall be wiped off after hardening, and a
remainder of the mold, working down into the previously polymer mortar or polymer paste with suitable fillers shall be
placed portion. Upon completion of the filling operation, the deposited and pressed down uniformly to the top edge of the
tops of the specimens should extend slightly above the tops of moldwithacappingplate.Inordertopreventthecappingplate
the molds. When the molds have been filled, strike off the from bonding to the paste or mortar, the underside of the
excess material, even with the top of the mold. Permit the capping plate shall be covered with a release agent.
C267 − 20
8.2.1.6 For capping after mold removal, stiff polymer paste 11.2 Exposure, Weighing, and Visual Inspection of Test
or mortar or a low-melting-point alloy for capping shall be Specimens—Following the conditioning period, weigh all the
used. A suitable apparatus to maintain parallel
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: C267 − 01 (Reapproved 2012) C267 − 20
Standard Test Methods for
Chemical Resistance of Mortars, Grouts, and Monolithic
Surfacings and Polymer Concretes
This standard is issued under the fixed designation C267; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.
1. Scope
1.1 These test methods are intended to evaluate the chemical resistance of resin, silica, silicate, sulfur, and hydraulic materials,
grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes under anticipated service conditions. These test methods provide for the
determination of changes in the following properties of the test specimens and test medium after exposure of the specimens to the
medium:
1.1.1 Weight of specimen,
1.1.2 Appearance of specimen,
1.1.3 Appearance of test medium, and
1.1.4 Compressive strength of specimens.
1.2 Test Method A outlines the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate less than 0.0625 in. (1.6 mm)
in size. Test Method B covers the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate from 0.0625 to 0.4 in. (1.6
to 1.0 mm) in size. Test Method C is used for systems containing aggregate larger than 0.4 in.
1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on Paint and Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications and are the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee D01.46 on Industrial Protective Coatings.
Current edition approved Nov. 15, 2012Sept. 1, 2020. Published November 2012October 2020. Originally approved in 1959. Last previous edition approved in 20062012
as C267 – 01 (2006).(2012). DOI: 10.1520/C0267-01R12.10.1520/C0267-20.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
C267 − 20
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
C470/C470M Specification for Molds for Forming Concrete Test Cylinders Vertically
C579 Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Chemical-Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer
Concretes
C904 Terminology Relating to Chemical-Resistant Nonmetallic Materials
C1312 Practice for Making and Conditioning Chemical-Resistant Sulfur Polymer Cement Concrete Test Specimens in the
Laboratory
E4 Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines
E177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods
E691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms used in these test methods, see Terminology C904.
4. Significance and Use
4.1 The results obtained by these test methods should serve as a guide in, but not as the sole basis for, selection of a
chemical-resistant material for a particular application. No attempt has been made to incorporate into these test methods all the
various factors that may affect the performance of a material when subjected to actual service. The strength values obtained by
these test methods should not be used to evaluate the compressive strength of chemical-resistant materials. The appropriate ASTM
test method for the specific material should be used for determining and evaluating the compressive strength.
5. Apparatus
5.1 Equipment, capable of weighing materials or specimens to 60.3 % accuracy.
5.2 Equipment for Mixing, consisting of a container of suitable size, preferably made of corrosion-resistant metal, or a porcelain
pan, and a strong, sturdy spatula or trowel.
5.3 Specimen Molds:
1 1
5.3.1 Test Method A—These molds shall be right cylinder 1 6 ⁄32 in. (25 6 0.8 mm) in diameter by 1 6 ⁄32 in. high. The molds
may be constructed in any manner that will allow formation of a test specimen of the desired size. Typical molds consist of a 1-in.
thick, flat plastic sheet in which 1-in. diameter, smooth-sided holes have been cut, and to the bottom of which a ⁄4-in. (6-mm) thick,
flat plastic sheet (without matching holes) is attached by means of screws or bolts. Alternately, the molds may consist of sections
of round plastic tubing or pipe, 1 in. in inside diameter and 1 in. long, having sufficient wall thickness to be rigid and retain
dimensional stability during the molding operation, and a ⁄4-in. thick, flat plastic sheet on which one open end of each section can
be rested. With the latter style of mold, the tubing segment may be sealed with a material, such as caulking compound or stopcock
grease. For most types of specimens it is satisfactory to simply seal one end of the tubing segment with masking tape.
1 1
NOTE 1—For use with sulfur mortars an additional piece of flat plastic sheet at least ⁄8 in. (3 mm) thick containing a ⁄4-in. (6-mm) hole and a section
of plastic tubing or pipe 1 in. (25 mm) in diameter by 1 in. high are required. They are used to form a pouring gate and reservoir in the preparation of
sulfur mortar specimens.
5.3.2 Test Method B—Molds for the 2-in. (50-mm) cube specimens shall be tight fitting and leakproof. The sides of the molds shall
be sufficiently rigid to prevent spreading or warping. The interior faces of the molds shall be manufactured to ensure plane surfaces
with a permissible variation of 0.002 in. (0.05 mm). The distances between opposite faces shall be 2 6 ⁄16 in. (50 6 0.8 mm).
The height of the molds shall be 2 6 ⁄16 in. The angle between adjacent interior faces and between interior faces and the bottom
of the mold shall be 90 6 0.5°.
5.3.3 Test Method C:
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
C267 − 20
5.3.3.1 For polymer concretes other than sulfur polymer cement concretes, molds shall be right cylinders made of heavy gage
metal or other rigid nonabsorbent material. The cylinder diameter shall be at least four times the nominal maximum aggregate size
in the mix. The minimum cylinder diameter shall be 2 in. (50 mm). The cylinder height shall be two times the diameter. The plane
of the rim of the mold shall be at right angles to the axis within 0.5°. The mold shall be at right angles to the axis within 0.5°.
The mold shall not vary from the prescribed diameter by more than ⁄16 in. (1.5 mm) nor from the prescribed height by more than
⁄8 in. (3 mm). Molds shall be provided with a flat base plate with a means for securing it to the mold at a right angle to the axis
of the cylinder in the instance of reusable metal molds. For molds other than metal, a mechanically attached smooth flat metal or
integrally molded flat bottom of the same material as the sides shall be used. Single-use molds shall conform to Specifications
C470/C470M.
5.3.3.2 For molds to be used for preparing sulfur polymer cement concrete specimens, refer to Practice C1312.
NOTE 2—The material from which the mold is constructed must be chemically inert and have antistick properties. Polyethylene, polypropylene,
polytetrafluoroethylene, and metal forms having either a sintered coating of tetrafluoroethylene or a suitable release agent compatible with the material
being tested are satisfactory. Because of their superior heat resistance, only trifluorochloroethylene and tetrafluoroethylene mold release agents should be
used with sulfur materials.
5.4 Weighing Equipment, of adequate capacity. For Method A, suitable for accurate weighing to 0.001 g.
5.5 Micrometer, suitable for accurate measurement to 0.001 in. (0.03 mm).
5.6 Containers:
5.6.1 Wide-Mouth Glass Jars, of sufficient capacity, fitted with plastic or plastic-lined metal screw caps for low-temperature tests
involving media of low volatility.
5.6.2 Erlenmeyer Flasks, of sufficient capacity, each fitted with standard-taper joints and a reflux condenser attachment for use
with volatile media.
5.6.3 Containers, as described in 5.6.1 and 5.6.2 having an inert coating on their inner surfaces, or containers of a suitable inert
material for use with media which attack glass.
5.7 Constant-Temperature Oven or Liquid Bath, capable of maintaining temperature within a range of 64°F (62°C).
5.8 Testing Machine, may be of any type of sufficient capacity which will provide the rates of loading prescribed. It shall have
been verified to have an accuracy of 1.0 %, or better, within twelve months of the time of use in accordance with Practices E4.
The testing machine shall be equipped with two steel bearing blocks with hardened faces, one of which is a spherically seated block
that will bear on the top of the specimen, and the other a plain block that will support the bottom. The size of the bearing block
shall be of sufficient size to contact the entire bearing surface of the specimen. The bearing faces shall not depart from a plane by
more than 0.001 in. (0.025 mm) in any 6-in. (150-mm) diameter circle.
6. Test Media
6.1 The test media shall consist of the media to which the chemical-resistant materials are to be exposed in service.
7. Test Specimens
7.1 The number of specimens required is dependent upon the number of test media to be employed, the number of different
temperatures at which testing is performed, and the frequency of test intervals. The test specimens shall consist of sets of a
minimum of three cylinders for one medium at a single temperature and for each test interval. In addition one set of at least three
specimens shall be available for test immediately following the conditioning period, and other sets of at least three, equivalent to
the number of test temperatures, for the total test period. Calculate the total number of specimens required as follows:
N 5 n M 3T 3I 1nT1n (1)
~ !
C267 − 20
where:
N = number of specimens,
n = number of specimens for a single test,
M = number of media,
T = number of test temperatures, and
I = number of test intervals.
NOTE 3—For calcium aluminate cements, strength and weight changes are a natural phenomena, with the degree of change being dependent upon the test
conditions involved. Therefore, when conducting chemical resistance tests on these products, additional sets of control samples should be prepared for
testing at each test temperature and each test interval. The immersion medium for these control samples will be potable water.
7.2 Make all specimens for a single determination from a single mix.
7.3 Test Method A—Prepare test specimens to be used in accordance with Test Method A as described in 8.1. Test specimens shall
1 1 1
be right cylinders 1 + ⁄32 in., − ⁄16 in. (25 + 0.8, − 1.6 mm) in diameter by 1 6 ⁄16 in. (25 6 1.6 mm) high. If the faces of the
specimen are not flat, smooth, and normal to the cylinder axis, they may be sanded, ground, or machined to specification. Exercise
care that the frictional heat developed during such operations does not damage the specimens.
7.4 Test Method B—Prepare test specimens to be used in accordance with Test Method B as described in 8.1. Test specimens shall
1 1
be cubes with dimensions of 2 + ⁄16 in., − ⁄8 in. (50 + 1.5, − 3.0 mm).
7.5 Test Method C:
7.5.1 For polymer concretes other than sulfur concretes, prepare the test specimens to be used in accordance with 8.2.
7.5.1.1 Do not test specimens if any individual diameter of a cylinder differs from any other diameter of the same cylinder by more
than 2 %.
7.5.1.2 Neither end of compressive test specimens, when tested, shall depart from perpendicular to the axis by more than 0.5°
(approximately equivalent to ⁄8 in. in 12 in. (3 mm in 300 mm). Compression test specimens that are not flat within 0.01 in. (0.25
mm) shall be sawed, ground, or capped in accordance with 8.2.1.2. Determine the diameter used for calculating the cross-sectional
area of the test specimen to the nearest 0.01 in. (0.25 mm) by averaging two diameters measured at right angles to each other at
about mid-height of the specimen.
7.5.2 For preparing sulfur polymer cement concrete test specimens, refer to Practice C1312.
8. Preparation of Specimens
8.1 Specimen Preparation for Test Methods A and B:
8.1.1 Resin, Silicate, and Silica Materials—Mix a sufficient amount of the components in the proportions and in the manner
specified by the manufacturer of the materials. Fill the molds one-half full. Remove any entrapped air by using a cutting and
stabbing motion with a spatula or rounded-end rod. Fill the remainder of the mold, working down into the previously placed
portion. Upon completion of the filling operation, the tops of the specimens should extend slightly above the tops of the molds.
When the molds have been filled, strike off the excess material, even with the top of the mold. Permit the material to remain in
the mold until it has set sufficiently to allow removal without danger of deformation or breakage.
8.1.1.1 Silicate Materials—Some silicates may require covering during the curing period. After removal from the molds, acid-treat
the specimens, if required, in accordance with the recommendations given by the manufacturer. No other treatment shall be
permitted. Record the method of treatment in 13.1.3.
8.1.2 Sulfur Materials:
8.1.2.1 Sulfur Mortars—Slowly melt a minimum of 2 lb (900 g) of the material in a suitable container at a temperature of 265
to 290°F (130 to 145°C) with constant agitation. Stir to lift and blend the aggregate without beating air into the melt. Place the
piece of plastic sheet containing the ⁄4-in. (6-mm) round hole over the open face of the mold with the hole centered on the face.
On top of the piece of plastic sheet and surrounding the hole, place a section of plastic tubing or pipe 1 in. (25 mm) in diameter
by 1 in. high. Pour the melted material through the hole into the mold and continue to pour until the section of tubing or pipe is
C267 − 20
completely filled. The excess material contained in the hole in the plastic sheet acts as a reservoir to compensate for shrinkage of
the material during cooling. Allow the specimen to remain in the mold until it has completely solidified. Upon removal, file, grind,
or sand the surface flush, removing the excess material remaining at the pouring gate.
8.1.2.2 Sulfur Polymer Cement Concretes—Prepare specimens in accordance with Practice C1312.
8.2 Specimen Preparation for Test Method C:
8.2.1 Polymer Concretes Other than Sulfur Polymer Cement Concretes—Prepare specimens in accordance with 8.1 with the
following additional considerations:
8.2.1.1 The use of vibrators may be required. The type and method of vibrating will be as recommended by the manufacturer and
shall be specified in the test report.
8.2.1.2 Filling and Capping for Cylindrical Resin, Silicate, and Silica Specimens—The top layer may be filled to slightly below
the top edge of the mold. The top surface of the specimen shall be finished as much as practicable to a plane perpendicular to the
axis of the specimen. The flatness of the finished specimen shall be within 0.010 in. (0.25 mm). Specimens exceeding this tolerance
shall be machined flat or a capping compound shall be applied.
8.2.1.3 Capping, if used, shall be made as thin as practicable and shall be applied before removal of the polymer concrete from
the molds.
8.2.1.4 If a polymer paste or mortar is used for capping, it is preferable that the polymer used be the same as the one used to make
the specimen. Fillers used may be the fine portion used in the polymer concrete or another mineral powder.
8.2.1.5 For capping in the mold, a suitable capping compound may be made from a polymer mortar. The surface of the polymer
concrete shall be wiped off after hardening, and a polymer mortar or polymer paste with suitable fillers shall be deposited and
pressed down uniformly to the top edge of the mold with a capping plate. In order to prevent the capping plate from bonding to
the paste or mortar, the underside of the capping plate shall be covered with a release agent.
8.2.1.6 For capping after mold removal, stiff polymer paste or mortar or a low-melting-point alloy for capping shall be used. A
suitable apparatus to maintain parallel ends on the specimen shall be used.
NOTE 4—Any capping compound to be used with polymer concrete should be tested to ascertain that its strength is high enough to prevent premature
failure in the cap when testing in high compressive strength polymer concretes. Cap failure may result in substantially lower compr
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...