ASTM C579-23
(Test Method)Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Chemical-Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer Concretes
Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Chemical-Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer Concretes
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 These test methods offer a means of determining the compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods cover the determination of the compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes. These materials may be based on resin, silicate, silica, or sulfur binders.
1.2 Test Method A outlines the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate less than 0.0625 in. (1.6 mm) in size. Test Method B covers the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate from 0.0625 in. to 0.4 in. (1.6 mm to 10 mm) in size. Test Method C is used for systems containing aggregate larger than 0.4 in.
1.3 These test methods provide two different methods for controlling the testing rate.
1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 31-May-2023
- Technical Committee
- D01 - Paint and Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications
- Drafting Committee
- D01.46 - Industrial Protective Coatings
Relations
- Refers
ASTM C904-01(2018) - Standard Terminology Relating to Chemical-Resistant Nonmetallic Materials - Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Jun-2014
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2014
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2013
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2013
- Refers
ASTM C904-01(2012) - Standard Terminology Relating to Chemical-Resistant Nonmetallic Materials - Effective Date
- 01-Aug-2012
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2011
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2010
- Effective Date
- 01-Jun-2010
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2009
- Refers
ASTM C470/C470M-09 - Standard Specification for Molds for Forming Concrete Test Cylinders Vertically - Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2009
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2009
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2008
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2008
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2008
Overview
ASTM C579-23: Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Chemical-Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer Concretes provides reliable procedures to determine the compressive strength of chemical-resistant construction materials. Managed by ASTM International, this standard is widely referenced for quality assurance and performance validation in environments exposed to corrosive or aggressive chemicals. It applies to materials using resin, silicate, silica, or sulfur binders and accommodates a variety of aggregate sizes with multiple test procedures designed for each.
With performance of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes crucial in industrial and infrastructure projects, ASTM C579-23 enables precise and repeatable assessment of compressive strength-a key factor in ensuring safe, durable, and chemical-resistant construction.
Key Topics
- Compressive Strength Testing: Describes standardized procedures for determining the compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes.
- Scope of Materials: Includes materials with resin, silicate, silica, and sulfur binders with variable aggregate size ranges.
- Test Methods:
- Test Method A: For systems with aggregates smaller than 0.0625 in. (1.6 mm)
- Test Method B: For aggregates from 0.0625 in. to 0.4 in. (1.6 mm to 10 mm)
- Test Method C: For aggregates larger than 0.4 in. (10 mm)
- Testing Rate Control: Specifies two methods of controlling the testing rate for accuracy.
- Sample Preparation and Conditioning: Details steps for preparing, curing, and handling test specimens, including guidelines for capping and surface finishing.
- Reporting Requirements: Includes documentation of material identification, mixing ratios, test methods used, specimen dimensions, observed failures, and compressive strength values.
- Precision and Reproducibility: Provides guidance on expected repeatability, reproducibility, and outlier handling based on interlaboratory studies.
Applications
- Industrial Flooring and Linings: Ensures materials meet durability standards for floors and liners in chemical processing and manufacturing plants.
- Protective Coatings: Used for quality control in production and installation of chemical-resistant and monolithic surfacing systems.
- Tile and Brick Mortars: Assists in verifying performance requirements for materials used in tile grouting and brick mortar, especially in corrosive environments.
- Infrastructure Maintenance: Supports maintenance and repair protocols in wastewater treatment plants, power plants, and secondary containment structures, where chemical resistance and structural integrity are critical.
- Manufacturer Quality Control: Applies throughout the production and supply chain to validate compressive strength before deployment in the field.
Related Standards
- ASTM C470/C470M: Specification for molds used in forming concrete test cylinders vertically.
- ASTM C904: Terminology relating to chemical-resistant nonmetallic materials.
- ASTM E4: Practices for force calibration and verification of testing machines, ensuring measurement accuracy.
- ASTM E177: Practice for use of precision and bias concepts in ASTM test methods.
- ASTM E691: Practice for conducting interlaboratory studies to determine test method precision.
Practical Value
Using ASTM C579-23 helps stakeholders to:
- Demonstrate compliance with industry regulations and client specifications for chemical-resistant materials.
- Minimize risk of failure in harsh chemical environments by selecting or approving only those materials proven to meet required compressive strength benchmarks.
- Provide standardized documentation to satisfy project and regulatory requirements, facilitating project approvals and certifications.
- Benchmark new material formulations and manufacturing changes against recognized test methods for ongoing product improvement and innovation.
Leveraging ASTM C579-23 improves safety, reliability, and longevity of chemical-resistant linings, mortars, grouts, and polymer concretes across a range of demanding industrial and infrastructure applications.
Buy Documents
ASTM C579-23 - Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Chemical-Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer Concretes
REDLINE ASTM C579-23 - Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Chemical-Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer Concretes
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

ICC Evaluation Service
Building products evaluation and certification.

QAI Laboratories
Building and construction product testing and certification.

Aboma Certification B.V.
Specialized in construction, metal, and transport sectors.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM C579-23 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Chemical-Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer Concretes". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 These test methods offer a means of determining the compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes. SCOPE 1.1 These test methods cover the determination of the compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes. These materials may be based on resin, silicate, silica, or sulfur binders. 1.2 Test Method A outlines the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate less than 0.0625 in. (1.6 mm) in size. Test Method B covers the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate from 0.0625 in. to 0.4 in. (1.6 mm to 10 mm) in size. Test Method C is used for systems containing aggregate larger than 0.4 in. 1.3 These test methods provide two different methods for controlling the testing rate. 1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 These test methods offer a means of determining the compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes. SCOPE 1.1 These test methods cover the determination of the compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes. These materials may be based on resin, silicate, silica, or sulfur binders. 1.2 Test Method A outlines the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate less than 0.0625 in. (1.6 mm) in size. Test Method B covers the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate from 0.0625 in. to 0.4 in. (1.6 mm to 10 mm) in size. Test Method C is used for systems containing aggregate larger than 0.4 in. 1.3 These test methods provide two different methods for controlling the testing rate. 1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ASTM C579-23 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 91.100.10 - Cement. Gypsum. Lime. Mortar. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM C579-23 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM C904-01(2018), ASTM E4-14, ASTM E177-14, ASTM E691-13, ASTM E177-13, ASTM C904-01(2012), ASTM E691-11, ASTM E177-10, ASTM E4-10, ASTM E4-09a, ASTM C470/C470M-09, ASTM E4-09, ASTM E4-08, ASTM E177-08, ASTM E691-08. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM C579-23 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: C579 − 23
Standard Test Methods for
Compressive Strength of Chemical-Resistant Mortars,
Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer Concretes
This standard is issued under the fixed designation C579; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.1 These test methods cover the determination of the
C470/C470M Specification for Molds for Forming Concrete
compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts,
Test Cylinders Vertically
monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes. These materials
C904 Terminology Relating to Chemical-Resistant Nonme-
may be based on resin, silicate, silica, or sulfur binders.
tallic Materials
1.2 Test Method A outlines the testing procedure generally
E4 Practices for Force Calibration and Verification of Test-
used for systems containing aggregate less than 0.0625 in. (1.6
ing Machines
mm) in size. Test Method B covers the testing procedure
E177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in
generally used for systems containing aggregate from
ASTM Test Methods
0.0625 in. to 0.4 in. (1.6 mm to 10 mm) in size. Test Method C
E691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to
is used for systems containing aggregate larger than 0.4 in.
Determine the Precision of a Test Method
1.3 These test methods provide two different methods for
3. Terminology
controlling the testing rate.
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms used in these test
1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded
methods, see Terminology C904.
as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only
4. Significance and Use
and are not considered standard.
4.1 These test methods offer a means of determining the
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the
compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts,
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes.
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter- 5. Apparatus
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
5.1 Equipment, capable of weighing materials or specimens
1.6 This international standard was developed in accor-
to 60.3 % accuracy.
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
5.2 Specimen Molds:
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
5.2.1 Test Method A—These molds shall be right cylinder
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
1 1
1 in. 6 ⁄32 in. (25 mm 6 0.8 mm) in diameter by 1 in. 6 ⁄32
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
in. high. The molds may be constructed in any manner that will
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
allow formation of a test specimen of the desired size. Typical
molds consist of a 1 in. thick, flat plastic sheet in which 1 in.
diameter, smooth-sided holes have been cut, and to the bottom
These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on
Paint and Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications and are the direct
responsibility of Subcommittee D01.46 on Industrial Protective Coatings. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved June 1, 2023. Published June 2023. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 1968. Last previous edition approved in 2018 as C579 – 18. DOI: Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
10.1520/C0579-23. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
C579 − 23
of which a ⁄4 in. (6 mm) thick, flat plastic sheet (without within twelve months of the time of use in accordance with
matching holes) is attached by means of screws or bolts. Practices E4. The testing machine shall be equipped with two
Alternately, the molds may consist of sections of round plastic steel bearing blocks with hardened faces, one of which is a
tubing or pipe, 1 in. inside diameter and 1 in. long, having spherically seated block that will bear on the top bearing plate,
sufficient wall thickness to be rigid and retain dimensional and the other a plain rigid block that will support the bottom
stability during the molding operation, and a ⁄4 in. thick, flat bearing plate. The diameter of the spherical bearing block shall
plastic sheet on which one open end of each section can be be at least 75 % of the width of the specimen. The bearing
rested. With the latter style of mold, the tubing segment may be faces shall not depart from a plane by more than 0.001 in.
sealed with a material, such as caulking compound or stopcock (0.025 mm) in any 6 in. (150 mm) diameter circle.
grease. For most types of specimens it is satisfactory to simply
seal one end of the tubing segment with masking tape.
6. Test Specimens
6.1 Make all specimens for a single determination from a
NOTE 1—For use with sulfur mortars an additional piece of flat plastic
1 1
sheet at least ⁄8 in. (3 mm) thick containing a ⁄4 in. (6 mm) hole and a
single mix.
section of plastic tubing or pipe 1 in. (25 mm) in diameter by 1 in. high
6.2 Test Method A—Prepare test specimens to be used in
are required. They are used to form a pouring gate and reservoir in the
preparation of sulfur mortar specimens. accordance with Test Method A as described in 6.5. Test
1 1
specimens shall be right cylinders 1 + ⁄32, − ⁄16 in.
5.2.2 Test Method B—Molds for the 2 in. (50 mm) cube
(25 + 0.8, − 1.6 mm) in diameter by 1 in. 6 ⁄16 in. (25 mm 6
specimens shall be tight fitting and leakproof. The molds shall
1.6 mm) high. If the faces of the specimen are not flat, smooth,
have not more than three cube compartments and shall be
and normal to the cylinder axis, they may be sanded, ground,
separable into not more than three parts. The parts of the
or machined to specification. Exercise care that the frictional
molds, when assembled, shall be positively held together. The
heat developed during such operations does not damage the
molds shall be made of materials not attacked by the product
specimens.
being tested. The sides of the molds shall be sufficiently rigid
to prevent spreading or warping. The interior faces of the 6.3 Test Method B—Prepare test specimens to be used in
molds shall be manufactured to ensure plane surfaces with a accordance with Test Method B as described in 6.5. Test
1 1
permissible variation of 0.002 in. (0.05 mm). The distances specimens shall be cubes with dimensions of 2 + ⁄16, − ⁄8 in.
between opposite faces shall be 2 in. 6 ⁄16 in. (50 mm 6 0.8
(50 + 1.5, − 3.0 mm). If the faces of the cube are not flat,
mm). The height of the molds, measured separately for each smooth, and normal to each other, they may be sanded, ground,
cube compartment, shall be 2 in. 6 ⁄16 in. The angle between
or machined to specification. Exercise care that the frictional
adjacent interior faces and between interior faces and top and heat developed during such operations does not damage the
bottom planes of the mold shall be 90° 6 0.5° measured at
specimens.
points slightly removed from the intersection of the faces.
6.4 Test Method C—Prepare test specimens to be used in
5.2.3 Test Method C—Molds shall be right cylinders made
accordance with Test Method C as described in 6.6.
of heavy gauge metal or other rigid nonabsorbent material. The
6.4.1 Do not test specimens if any individual diameter of a
cylinder diameter shall be at least four times the nominal
cylinder differs from any other diameter of the same cylinder
maximum aggregate size in the mix. The minimum cylinder
by more than 2 %.
diameter shall be 2 in. (50 mm). The cylinder height shall be
6.4.2 Neither end of compressive test specimens, when
two times the diameter. The plane of the rim of the mold shall
tested, shall depart from perpendicular to the axis by more than
be at right angles to the axis within 0.5°. The mold shall be at
0.5° (approximately equivalent to ⁄8 in. in 12 in. (3 mm in 300
right angles to the axis within 0.5°. The mold shall not vary
mm). Cap the ends of compression test specimens that are not
from the prescribed diameter by more than ⁄16 in. (1.5 mm) nor
flat within 0.002 in. (0.05 mm) in accordance with 6.6, sawed
from the prescribed height by more than ⁄8 in. (3 mm). Molds
or ground. Determine the diameter used for calculating the
shall be provided with a flat base plate with a means for
cross-sectional area of the test specimen to the nearest 0.01 in.
securing it to the mold at a right angle to the axis of the
(0.25 mm) by averaging two diameters measured at right
cylinder in the instance of reusable metal molds. For molds
angles to each other at about mid-height of the specimen.
other than metal, a mechanically attached smooth flat metal or
6.5 Specimen Preparation for Test Methods A and B:
integrally molded flat bottom of the same material, as the sides
6.5.1 Resin, Silicate, and Silica Materials—Mix a sufficient
shall be used. Single-use molds shall conform to Specification
amount of the components in the proportions and in the manner
C470/C470M.
specified by the manufacturer of the materials. Fill the molds
NOTE 2—The material from which the mold is constructed must be
one-half full. Remove any entrapped air by using a cutting and
chemically inert and have antistick properties. Polyethylene,
stabbing motion with a spatula or rounded-end rod. Fill the
polypropylene, polytetrafluorethylene, and metal forms having either a
remainder of the mold, working down into the previously
sintered coating of tetrafluoroethylene or a suitable release agent compat-
ible with the material being tested are satisfactory. Because of their placed portion. Upon completion of the filling operation, the
superior heat resistance, only trifluorochloroethylene and tetrafluoroeth-
tops of the specimens should extend slightly above the tops of
ylene mold release agents should be used with sulfur materials.
the molds. When the molds have been filled, strike off the
5.3 The testing machine may be of any type of sufficient excess material, even with the top of the mold. Permit the
capacity which will provide the rates of loading prescribed. It material to remain in the mold until it has set sufficiently to
shall have been verified to have an accuracy of 1.0 %, or better, allow removal without danger of deformation or breakage.
C579 − 23
6.5.1.1 Silicate Materials—Some silicates may require cov- tolerance shall be machined flat or a capping compound shall
ering during the curing period. After removal from the molds, be applied if the test load is to be applied to the surface.
acid-treat the specimens, if required, in accordance with the 6.6.2.1 Capping, if used, shall be made as thin as practicable
recommendations given by the manufacturer. No other treat- and shall be applied before removal of the polymer concrete
from the molds.
ment shall be permitted. Record the method of treatment in
9.1.8. 6.6.2.2 If a polymer paste or mortar is used for capping, it is
preferable that the polymer used be the same as the one used to
6.5.2 Sulfur Materials:
make the specimen. Fillers used may be the fine portion used
6.5.2.1 Sulfur Mortars—Slowly melt a minimum of 2 lb
in the polymer concrete or another mineral powder.
(900 g) of the material in a suitable container at a temperature
6.6.2.3 For capping in the mold, a suitable capping com-
of 265 °F to 290 °F (130 °C to 145 °C) with constant agitation.
pound may be made from a polymer mortar. The surface of the
Stir to lift and blend the aggregate without beating air into the
polymer concrete shall be wiped off after hardening, and a
melt. Place the piece of plastic sheet containing the ⁄4 in.
polymer mortar or polymer paste with suitable fillers shall be
(6 mm) round hole over the open face of the mold with the hole
deposited and pressed down uniformly to the
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: C579 − 18 C579 − 23
Standard Test Methods for
Compressive Strength of Chemical-Resistant Mortars,
Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer Concretes
This standard is issued under the fixed designation C579; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.
1. Scope
1.1 These test methods cover the determination of the compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic
surfacings, and polymer concretes. These materials may be based on resin, silicate, silica, or sulfur binders.
1.2 Test Method A outlines the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate less than 0.0625 in. (1.6 mm)
in size. Test Method B covers the testing procedure generally used for systems containing aggregate from 0.06250.0625 in. to 0.4
in. (1.6(1.6 mm to 10 mm) in size. Test Method C is used for systems containing aggregate larger than 0.4 in.
1.3 These test methods provide two different methods for controlling the testing rate.
1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
C470/C470M Specification for Molds for Forming Concrete Test Cylinders Vertically
C904 Terminology Relating to Chemical-Resistant Nonmetallic Materials
E4 Practices for Force Calibration and Verification of Testing Machines
E177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods
E691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method
These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on Paint and Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications and are the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee D01.46 on Industrial Protective Coatings.
Current edition approved July 1, 2018June 1, 2023. Published November 2018June 2023. Originally approved in 1968. Last previous edition approved in 20122018 as
C579 – 01 (2012).C579 – 18. DOI: 10.1520/C0579-18.10.1520/C0579-23.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
C579 − 23
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms used in these test methods, see Terminology C904.
4. Significance and Use
4.1 These test methods offer a means of determining the compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic
surfacings, and polymer concretes.
5. Apparatus
5.1 Equipment, capable of weighing materials or specimens to 60.3 % accuracy.
5.2 Specimen Molds:
1 1
5.2.1 Test Method A—These molds shall be right cylinder 11 in. 6 ⁄32 in. (25(25 mm 6 0.8 mm) in diameter by 11 in. 6 ⁄32 in.
high. The molds may be constructed in any manner that will allow formation of a test specimen of the desired size. Typical molds
consist of a 1-in.1 in. thick, flat plastic sheet in which 1-in.1 in. diameter, smooth-sided holes have been cut, and to the bottom of
which a ⁄4-in. (6-mm) in. (6 mm) thick, flat plastic sheet (without matching holes) is attached by means of screws or bolts.
Alternately, the molds may consist of sections of round plastic tubing or pipe, 1-in.1 in. inside diameter and 1 in. long, having
sufficient wall thickness to be rigid and retain dimensional stability during the molding operation, and a ⁄4-in. in. thick, flat plastic
sheet on which one open end of each section can be rested. With the latter style of mold, the tubing segment may be sealed with
a material, such as caulking compound or stopcock grease. For most types of specimens it is satisfactory to simply seal one end
of the tubing segment with masking tape.
1 1
NOTE 1—For use with sulfur mortars an additional piece of flat plastic sheet at least ⁄8 in. (3 mm) thick containing a ⁄4-in. (6-mm) in. (6 mm) hole and
a section of plastic tubing or pipe 1 in. (25 mm) in diameter by 1 in. high are required. They are used to form a pouring gate and reservoir in the preparation
of sulfur mortar specimens.
5.2.2 Test Method B—Molds for the 2 in. (50 mm) cube specimens shall be tight fitting and leakproof. The molds shall have not
more than three cube compartments and shall be separable into not more than three parts. The parts of the molds, when assembled,
shall be positively held together. The molds shall be made of materials not attacked by the product being tested. The sides of the
molds shall be sufficiently rigid to prevent spreading or warping. The interior faces of the molds shall be manufactured to ensure
plane surfaces with a permissible variation of 0.002 in. (0.05 mm). The distances between opposite faces shall be 22 in. 6 ⁄16 in.
(50(50 mm 6 0.8 mm). The height of the molds, measured separately for each cube compartment, shall be 22 in. 6 ⁄16 in. The
angle between adjacent interior faces and between interior faces and top and bottom planes of the mold shall be 9090° 6 0.5°
measured at points slightly removed from the intersection of the faces.
5.2.3 Test Method C—Molds shall be right cylinders made of heavy gagegauge metal or other rigid nonabsorbent material. The
cylinder diameter shall be at least four times the nominal maximum aggregate size in the mix. The minimum cylinder diameter
shall be 2 in. (50 mm). The cylinder height shall be two times the diameter. The plane of the rim of the mold shall be at right angles
to the axis within 0.5°. The mold shall be at right angles to the axis within 0.5°. The mold shall not vary from the prescribed
1 1
diameter by more than ⁄16 in. (1.5 mm) nor from the prescribed height by more than ⁄8 in. (3 mm). Molds shall be provided with
a flat base plate with a means for securing it to the mold at a right angle to the axis of the cylinder in the instance of reusable metal
molds. For molds other than metal, a mechanically attached smooth flat metal or integrally molded flat bottom of the same material,
as the sides shall be used. Single-use molds shall conform to Specification C470/C470M.
NOTE 2—The material from which the mold is constructed must be chemically inert and have antistick properties. Polyethylene, polypropylene,
polytetrafluorethylene, and metal forms having either a sintered coating of tetrafluoroethylene or a suitable release agent compatible with the material
being tested are satisfactory. Because of their superior heat resistance, only trifluorochloroethylene and tetrafluoroethylene mold release agents should be
used with sulfur materials.
5.3 The testing machine may be of any type of sufficient capacity which will provide the rates of loading prescribed. It shall have
been verified to have an accuracy of 1.0 %, or better, within twelve months of the time of use in accordance with Practices E4.
The testing machine shall be equipped with two steel bearing blocks with hardened faces, one of which is a spherically seated block
that will bear on the top bearing plate, and the other a plain rigid block that will support the bottom bearing plate. The diameter
of the spherical bearing block shall be at least 75 % of the width of the specimen. The bearing faces shall not depart from a plane
by more than 0.001 in. (0.025 mm) in any 6-in. (150-mm)6 in. (150 mm) diameter circle.
C579 − 23
6. Test Specimens
6.1 Make all specimens for a single determination from a single mix.
6.2 Test Method A—Prepare test specimens to be used in accordance with Test Method A as described in 6.5. Test specimens shall
1 1 1
be right cylinders 1 + ⁄32, − ⁄16 in. (25 + 0.8, − 1.6 mm) in diameter by 11 in. 6 ⁄16 in. (25(25 mm 6 1.6 mm) high. If the faces
of the specimen are not flat, smooth, and normal to the cylinder axis, they may be sanded, ground, or machined to specification.
Exercise care that the frictional heat developed during such operations does not damage the specimens.
6.3 Test Method B—Prepare test specimens to be used in accordance with Test Method B as described in 6.5. Test specimens shall
1 1
be cubes with dimensions of 2 + ⁄16, − ⁄8 in. (50 + 1.5, − 3.0 mm). If the faces of the cube are not flat, smooth, and normal to each
other, they may be sanded, ground, or machined to specification. Exercise care that the frictional heat developed during such
operations does not damage the specimens.
6.4 Test Method C—Prepare test specimens to be used in accordance with Test Method C as described in 6.6.
6.4.1 Do not test specimens if any individual diameter of a cylinder differs from any other diameter of the same cylinder by more
than 2 %.
6.4.2 Neither end of compressive test specimens, when tested, shall depart from perpendicular to the axis by more than 0.5°
(approximately equivalent to ⁄8 in. in 12 in. (3 mm in 300 mm). Cap the ends of compression test specimens that are not flat within
0.002 in. (0.05 mm) in accordance with 6.6, sawed or ground. Determine the diameter used for calculating the cross-sectional area
of the test specimen to the nearest 0.01 in. (0.25 mm) by averaging two diameters measured at right angles to each other at about
mid-height of the specimen.
6.5 Specimen Preparation for Test Methods A and B:
6.5.1 Resin, Silicate, and Silica Materials—Mix a sufficient amount of the components in the proportions and in the manner
specified by the manufacturer of the materials. Fill the molds one-half full. Remove any entrapped air by using a cutting and
stabbing motion with a spatula or rounded-end rod. Fill the remainder of the mold, working down into the previously placed
portion. Upon completion of the filling operation, the tops of the specimens should extend slightly above the tops of the molds.
When the molds have been filled, strike off the excess material, even with the top of the mold. Permit the material to remain in
the mold until it has set sufficiently to allow removal without danger of deformation or breakage.
6.5.1.1 Silicate Materials—Some silicates may require covering during the curing period. After removal from the molds, acid-treat
the specimens, if required, in accordance with the recommendations given by the manufacturer. No other treatment shall be
permitted. Record the method of treatment in 9.1.8.
6.5.2 Sulfur Materials:
6.5.2.1 Sulfur Mortars—Slowly melt a minimum of 2 lb (900 g) of the material in a suitable container at a temperature of 265
to 290°F (130 to 145°C)265 °F to 290 °F (130 °C to 145 °C) with constant agitation. Stir to lift and blend the aggregate without
beating air into the melt. Place the piece of plastic sheet containing the ⁄4-in. (6-mm) in. (6 mm) round hole over the open face
of the mold with the hole centered on the face. On top of the piece of plastic sheet and surrounding the hole, place a section of
plastic tubing or pipe 1 in. (25 mm) in diameter by 1 in. high. Pour the melted material through the hole into the mold and continue
to pour until the section of tubing or pipe is completely filled. The excess material contained in the hole in the plastic sheet acts
as a reservoir to compensate for shrinkage of the material during cooling.
6.5.2.2 Allow the specimen to remain in the mold until it has completely solidified. Upon removal, file, grind, or sand the surface
flush, removing the excess material remaining at the pouring gate.
6.5.2.3 Sulfur Concrete—Heat and mix a sufficient amount of aggregate components and sulfur cement in the proportions and
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...