ASTM D8340-22
(Practice)Standard Practice for Performance-Based Qualification of Spectroscopic Analyzer Systems
Standard Practice for Performance-Based Qualification of Spectroscopic Analyzer Systems
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This practice is intended for use by parties interested in releasing product by use of vibrational spectroscopic analyzer systems. It is expected to meet the industry need for a written practical reference describing a scientifically systematic approach to show the degree of confidence and degree of uncertainty in analyzer predicted values in relation to the PTM.
5.2 This is a performance-based practice that relies on the demonstrated quality of the test result and on strict adherence to the referenced standards and the additional requirements in this practice.
5.3 As part of demonstrating performance, this practice incorporates by reference other ASTM standardized practices as key steps in the process.
5.4 There are prescriptive requirements included for this practice.
5.4.1 The practice requires sample temperature to be carefully controlled in analyzer system hardware or that effects of temperature change be compensated in modeling or software.
5.4.2 Outlier detection capability is required for demonstrating the multivariate calibration model is applicable for the analysis of the sample spectrum, that is, that the analysis interpolates the model, that the sample does not contain a statistically significant amount of unmodeled components above a certain limit based on spectral residual statistic and that the sample spectrum does not fall within gap in the multivariate calibration space.
5.5 In order to follow this practice, all criteria must be met.
5.5.1 The user shall investigate the cause of not meeting the practice requirements.
5.5.2 For any nonconformities noticed, the user shall make corrections to the analyzer system or procedures to conform to the requirements of this practice.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers requirements for establishing performance-based qualification of vibrational spectroscopic analyzer systems intended to be used to predict the test result of a material that would be produced by a Primary Test Method (PTM) if the same material is tested by the PTM.
1.1.1 This practice provides methodology to establish the lower/upper prediction limits associated with the Predicted Primary Test Method Result (PPTMR) in 1.1 with a specified degree of confidence that would contain the PTM result (if tested by the PTM).
1.1.2 The prediction limits in 1.1.1 can be used to estimate the confidence that product released using the analyzer system based on a PPTMR that meets PTM-based specification limits will meet PTM-based specification limits when tested by a PTM.
1.2 The practice covers the qualification of on-line, at-line, or laboratory infrared or Raman analyzers used to predict physical, chemical, or performance properties of liquid petroleum products and fuels. Infrared analyzers can operate in the near-infrared (NIR) region, mid-infrared (MIR) region, or both.
1.2.1 This practice applies to all analyzer systems that can meet the performance requirements defined within.
1.2.2 This practice is not limited to analyzers designed by any specific instrument manufacturer.
1.2.3 This practice allows for multiple calibration techniques to create a multivariate model which relates the spectra produced by the analyzer to the corresponding property determined by a PTM. Spectra can be used to predict multiple properties, but the analyzer system performance of each predicted property is qualified individually.
1.3 The practice describes procedures for establishing performance requirements for analyzer system applications. The user of this practice must establish written protocols to confirm the procedures are being followed.
1.4 This practice makes use of standard practices, guides, and methods already established in ASTM. Additional requirements are listed within this practice.
1.5 Any multivariate model that meets performance requirements and detects when the spectrum of a sample is an outlier (analysis that represents an extrapolation...
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 30-Sep-2022
- Technical Committee
- D02 - Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants
Relations
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2024
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2024
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2024
- Refers
ASTM D4175-23a - Standard Terminology Relating to Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants - Effective Date
- 15-Dec-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2023
- Refers
ASTM D2699-23b - Standard Test Method for Research Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel - Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2023
- Refers
ASTM D2699-23a - Standard Test Method for Research Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel - Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2023
- Refers
ASTM D5842-23 - Standard Practice for Sampling and Handling of Fuels for Volatility Measurement - Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2023
Overview
ASTM D8340-22: Standard Practice for Performance-Based Qualification of Spectroscopic Analyzer Systems provides a systematic, performance-driven framework for the qualification and validation of vibrational spectroscopic analyzer systems. Developed by ASTM International, this standard addresses the release of products, such as liquid petroleum products and fuels, based on results obtained from spectroscopic analyzers (including near-infrared [NIR], mid-infrared [MIR], and Raman spectrometers) rather than traditional primary test methods (PTMs).
The standard ensures a high degree of confidence and well-defined uncertainty in predicted property values generated by these analyzer systems. It consolidates existing ASTM practices and introduces additional prescriptive requirements to foster reliability and consistency in spectroscopic analysis across laboratory, on-line, and at-line applications.
Key Topics
Performance-Based Qualification
ASTM D8340-22 emphasizes demonstrated performance, requiring validation against traditional PTMs to ensure spectroscopic analyzer results are within agreed confidence limits. The methodology establishes prediction limits for analyzer results, offering clear guidelines for decision-making.Stringent Temperature Control
The practice mandates that temperature effects in spectroscopic measurements be either minimized via hardware controls or appropriately compensated for in the data modeling or software, as changes in sample temperature can affect spectral outcomes.Outlier Detection and Model Applicability
Analyzer systems must include robust outlier detection. This involves identifying samples with spectra outside the calibration model’s range or those that fall into gaps within the multivariate calibration space. Only results that interpolate the model (rather than extrapolate) are considered valid.Model Calibration and Validation
The practice supports multiple calibration techniques, such as multivariate modeling, and requires that each property predicted by the analyzer be qualified individually. Periodic validation is essential, including both general and local validation protocols, often referencing ASTM Practices D6122 and D3764.Comprehensive Documentation and Corrections
Users are required to document validation protocols, investigate causes when criteria are not met, and implement corrective actions, ensuring ongoing system compliance and data integrity.
Applications
ASTM D8340-22 is used across a range of applications in the petroleum and petrochemical industries for:
Qualification of Analyzer Systems:
Ensuring that infrared and Raman spectrometers, whether on-line, at-line, or laboratory-based, can reliably predict physical, chemical, and performance properties of products such as fuels, biofuel blends, and lubricant base stocks.Quality Release Decisions:
Enabling manufacturers to release products based on analyzer predictions that meet or exceed the precision and confidence associated with established PTMs.Process and Laboratory Monitoring:
Supporting rapid and cost-effective process control and product quality monitoring, reducing reliance on time-consuming conventional laboratory tests.Blending and Compliance:
Facilitating real-time validation of blend properties and ensuring compliance with specification limits using predictive models.
Related Standards
ASTM D8340-22 incorporates and references several important ASTM standards, including:
- ASTM D6122: Validation of the Performance of Multivariate Analyzer Systems.
- ASTM D3764: Validation of Process Stream Analyzer Systems.
- ASTM D8321: Development and Validation of Multivariate Analyses for Product Prediction.
- ASTM D6708: Statistical Assessment and Improvement of Agreement Between Test Methods.
- ASTM D6299: Statistical Quality Assurance for Measurement Systems.
- ASTM D6792: Quality Management in Petroleum Laboratories.
These related standards provide additional requirements and guidance for analyzer validation, calibration, and quality assurance, thereby ensuring comprehensive performance-based qualification of spectroscopic analyzer systems.
Keywords: ASTM D8340-22, spectroscopic analyzer systems, performance-based qualification, vibrational spectroscopy, petroleum products, analyzer validation, multivariate model, infrared analysis, Raman spectroscopy, temperature control, outlier detection, quality assurance, PTM, product release.
Buy Documents
ASTM D8340-22 - Standard Practice for Performance-Based Qualification of Spectroscopic Analyzer Systems
REDLINE ASTM D8340-22 - Standard Practice for Performance-Based Qualification of Spectroscopic Analyzer Systems
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard
BSMI (Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection)
Taiwan's standards and inspection authority.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM D8340-22 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Practice for Performance-Based Qualification of Spectroscopic Analyzer Systems". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 This practice is intended for use by parties interested in releasing product by use of vibrational spectroscopic analyzer systems. It is expected to meet the industry need for a written practical reference describing a scientifically systematic approach to show the degree of confidence and degree of uncertainty in analyzer predicted values in relation to the PTM. 5.2 This is a performance-based practice that relies on the demonstrated quality of the test result and on strict adherence to the referenced standards and the additional requirements in this practice. 5.3 As part of demonstrating performance, this practice incorporates by reference other ASTM standardized practices as key steps in the process. 5.4 There are prescriptive requirements included for this practice. 5.4.1 The practice requires sample temperature to be carefully controlled in analyzer system hardware or that effects of temperature change be compensated in modeling or software. 5.4.2 Outlier detection capability is required for demonstrating the multivariate calibration model is applicable for the analysis of the sample spectrum, that is, that the analysis interpolates the model, that the sample does not contain a statistically significant amount of unmodeled components above a certain limit based on spectral residual statistic and that the sample spectrum does not fall within gap in the multivariate calibration space. 5.5 In order to follow this practice, all criteria must be met. 5.5.1 The user shall investigate the cause of not meeting the practice requirements. 5.5.2 For any nonconformities noticed, the user shall make corrections to the analyzer system or procedures to conform to the requirements of this practice. SCOPE 1.1 This practice covers requirements for establishing performance-based qualification of vibrational spectroscopic analyzer systems intended to be used to predict the test result of a material that would be produced by a Primary Test Method (PTM) if the same material is tested by the PTM. 1.1.1 This practice provides methodology to establish the lower/upper prediction limits associated with the Predicted Primary Test Method Result (PPTMR) in 1.1 with a specified degree of confidence that would contain the PTM result (if tested by the PTM). 1.1.2 The prediction limits in 1.1.1 can be used to estimate the confidence that product released using the analyzer system based on a PPTMR that meets PTM-based specification limits will meet PTM-based specification limits when tested by a PTM. 1.2 The practice covers the qualification of on-line, at-line, or laboratory infrared or Raman analyzers used to predict physical, chemical, or performance properties of liquid petroleum products and fuels. Infrared analyzers can operate in the near-infrared (NIR) region, mid-infrared (MIR) region, or both. 1.2.1 This practice applies to all analyzer systems that can meet the performance requirements defined within. 1.2.2 This practice is not limited to analyzers designed by any specific instrument manufacturer. 1.2.3 This practice allows for multiple calibration techniques to create a multivariate model which relates the spectra produced by the analyzer to the corresponding property determined by a PTM. Spectra can be used to predict multiple properties, but the analyzer system performance of each predicted property is qualified individually. 1.3 The practice describes procedures for establishing performance requirements for analyzer system applications. The user of this practice must establish written protocols to confirm the procedures are being followed. 1.4 This practice makes use of standard practices, guides, and methods already established in ASTM. Additional requirements are listed within this practice. 1.5 Any multivariate model that meets performance requirements and detects when the spectrum of a sample is an outlier (analysis that represents an extrapolation...
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 This practice is intended for use by parties interested in releasing product by use of vibrational spectroscopic analyzer systems. It is expected to meet the industry need for a written practical reference describing a scientifically systematic approach to show the degree of confidence and degree of uncertainty in analyzer predicted values in relation to the PTM. 5.2 This is a performance-based practice that relies on the demonstrated quality of the test result and on strict adherence to the referenced standards and the additional requirements in this practice. 5.3 As part of demonstrating performance, this practice incorporates by reference other ASTM standardized practices as key steps in the process. 5.4 There are prescriptive requirements included for this practice. 5.4.1 The practice requires sample temperature to be carefully controlled in analyzer system hardware or that effects of temperature change be compensated in modeling or software. 5.4.2 Outlier detection capability is required for demonstrating the multivariate calibration model is applicable for the analysis of the sample spectrum, that is, that the analysis interpolates the model, that the sample does not contain a statistically significant amount of unmodeled components above a certain limit based on spectral residual statistic and that the sample spectrum does not fall within gap in the multivariate calibration space. 5.5 In order to follow this practice, all criteria must be met. 5.5.1 The user shall investigate the cause of not meeting the practice requirements. 5.5.2 For any nonconformities noticed, the user shall make corrections to the analyzer system or procedures to conform to the requirements of this practice. SCOPE 1.1 This practice covers requirements for establishing performance-based qualification of vibrational spectroscopic analyzer systems intended to be used to predict the test result of a material that would be produced by a Primary Test Method (PTM) if the same material is tested by the PTM. 1.1.1 This practice provides methodology to establish the lower/upper prediction limits associated with the Predicted Primary Test Method Result (PPTMR) in 1.1 with a specified degree of confidence that would contain the PTM result (if tested by the PTM). 1.1.2 The prediction limits in 1.1.1 can be used to estimate the confidence that product released using the analyzer system based on a PPTMR that meets PTM-based specification limits will meet PTM-based specification limits when tested by a PTM. 1.2 The practice covers the qualification of on-line, at-line, or laboratory infrared or Raman analyzers used to predict physical, chemical, or performance properties of liquid petroleum products and fuels. Infrared analyzers can operate in the near-infrared (NIR) region, mid-infrared (MIR) region, or both. 1.2.1 This practice applies to all analyzer systems that can meet the performance requirements defined within. 1.2.2 This practice is not limited to analyzers designed by any specific instrument manufacturer. 1.2.3 This practice allows for multiple calibration techniques to create a multivariate model which relates the spectra produced by the analyzer to the corresponding property determined by a PTM. Spectra can be used to predict multiple properties, but the analyzer system performance of each predicted property is qualified individually. 1.3 The practice describes procedures for establishing performance requirements for analyzer system applications. The user of this practice must establish written protocols to confirm the procedures are being followed. 1.4 This practice makes use of standard practices, guides, and methods already established in ASTM. Additional requirements are listed within this practice. 1.5 Any multivariate model that meets performance requirements and detects when the spectrum of a sample is an outlier (analysis that represents an extrapolation...
ASTM D8340-22 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 17.180.30 - Optical measuring instruments. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM D8340-22 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM D6708-24, ASTM D2699-24, ASTM D2700-24, ASTM D4175-23a, ASTM D1265-23a, ASTM D86-23a, ASTM D6299-23a, ASTM D86-23ae1, ASTM D6792-23c, ASTM D2700-23b, ASTM D2699-23b, ASTM D2699-23a, ASTM D2700-23a, ASTM D5842-23, ASTM D6792-23b. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM D8340-22 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation:D8340 −22
Standard Practice for
Performance-Based Qualification of Spectroscopic Analyzer
Systems
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D8340; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
Successfuluseofspectroscopicanalyzersinvolvesseveralactivities,includingsampleintroduction,
analyzer calibration, and analyzer validation. Many of these activities are covered in separate existing
documents, but not necessarily tied together therein. There are also activities not captured in existing
documentsthatareessentialforspectroscopicmethods.Thispracticeisintendedtopullthesetogether
for users to employ and show the confidence in an analyzer system.
Thispracticeisnotlimitedtospecificanalyzersorapplications.Itdoesprovidecertainrequirements
that analyzers, associated systems, and software must meet.
1. Scope* 1.2.2 This practice is not limited to analyzers designed by
any specific instrument manufacturer.
1.1 This practice covers requirements for establishing
1.2.3 This practice allows for multiple calibration tech-
performance-based qualification of vibrational spectroscopic
niques to create a multivariate model which relates the spectra
analyzer systems intended to be used to predict the test result
produced by the analyzer to the corresponding property deter-
ofamaterialthatwouldbeproducedbyaPrimaryTestMethod
mined by a PTM. Spectra can be used to predict multiple
(PTM) if the same material is tested by the PTM.
properties, but the analyzer system performance of each
1.1.1 This practice provides methodology to establish the
predicted property is qualified individually.
lower/upper prediction limits associated with the Predicted
Primary Test Method Result (PPTMR) in 1.1 with a specified
1.3 The practice describes procedures for establishing per-
degree of confidence that would contain the PTM result (if
formance requirements for analyzer system applications. The
tested by the PTM).
user of this practice must establish written protocols to confirm
1.1.2 The prediction limits in 1.1.1 can be used to estimate
the procedures are being followed.
the confidence that product released using the analyzer system
based on a PPTMR that meets PTM-based specification limits 1.4 This practice makes use of standard practices, guides,
will meet PTM-based specification limits when tested by a and methods already established inASTM.Additional require-
PTM. ments are listed within this practice.
1.2 The practice covers the qualification of on-line, at-line,
1.5 Anymultivariatemodelthatmeetsperformancerequire-
or laboratory infrared or Raman analyzers used to predict
ments and detects when the spectrum of a sample is an outlier
physical, chemical, or performance properties of liquid petro-
(analysis that represents an extrapolation of the model) or a
leum products and fuels. Infrared analyzers can operate in the
nearestneighbordistanceinlier(aspectrumresidinginagapin
near-infrared (NIR) region, mid-infrared (MIR) region, or
the multivariate space) can be used.
both.
1.6 This practice can be used with methods for determining
1.2.1 This practice applies to all analyzer systems that can
properties of biofuel blends. Three alternative procedures can
meet the performance requirements defined within.
be used. In all three cases, the qualification of the predicted
values for the blend are established and monitored as part of a
continual program by application of Practice D6122 or by
This practice is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum
combined application of Practices D6122 and D3764 (see
Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants and is the direct responsibility of Subcom-
definition in section 3.1.18).
mittee D02.25 on Performance Assessment and Validation of Process Stream
Analyzer Systems.
1.6.1 If the analyzer is used to directly predict a property of
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2022. Published November 2022. Originally
the biofuel blend, and both the Primary Test Method Result
approved in 2020. Last previous edition approved in 2021 as D8340 – 21. DOI:
10.1520/D8340-22. (PTMR) and Predicted Primary Test Method Result (PPTMR)
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D8340−22
are measured on the same material, then the analyzer is D4175 Terminology Relating to Petroleum Products, Liquid
validated using Practice D6122. Fuels, and Lubricants
1.6.2 If the analyzer is used to directly predict a property of D4177 Practice for Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and
ablendstocktowhichafixedlevelofbiofuelmaterialisadded Petroleum Products
prior to measurement by the PTM, and if the multivariate D5842 Practice for Sampling and Handling of Fuels for
model correlates the spectrum of the blend stock to the PTMR Volatility Measurement
for the fixed level blend, then the analyzer is validated using D6122 Practice for Validation of the Performance of Multi-
Practice D6122. variate Online, At-Line, Field and Laboratory Infrared
1.6.3 If the analyzer directly predicts a property of a blend Spectrophotometer, and Raman Spectrometer Based Ana-
stock to which some amount of biofuel material is later added, lyzer Systems
then Practice D6122 is used to validate the analyzer perfor- D6299 Practice for Applying Statistical Quality Assurance
mance. If the PPTMR produced by the analyzer is input into a and Control Charting Techniques to Evaluate Analytical
second model to predict the property value for the final blend, Measurement System Performance
basedonthePPTMRfortheblendstockandtheblendlevelfor D6596 Practice for Ampulization and Storage of Gasoline
thebiofuelmaterial,thentheperformanceofthissecondmodel and Related Hydrocarbon Materials
is validated using Practice D3764. D6624 Practice for Determining a Flow-Proportioned Aver-
age Property Value (FPAPV) for a Collected Batch of
1.7 Disclaimer of Liability as to Patented Inventions—
Process Stream Material Using Stream Analyzer Data
Neither ASTM International nor an ASTM committee shall be
D6708 Practice for StatisticalAssessment and Improvement
responsible for identifying all patents under which a license is
of Expected Agreement Between Two Test Methods that
required in using this document. ASTM International takes no
Purport to Measure the Same Property of a Material
position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in
D6792 Practice for Quality Management Systems in Petro-
connection with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of
leum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants Testing
this standard are expressly advised that determination of the
Laboratories
validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement
D7453 Practice for Sampling of Petroleum Products for
of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
Analysis by Process Stream Analyzers and for Process
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the
Stream Analyzer System Validation
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
D7808 Practice for Determining the Site Precision of a
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
Process Stream Analyzer on Process Stream Material
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
D7825 Practice for Generating a Process Stream Property
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Value through Application of a Process Stream Analyzer
1.9 This international standard was developed in accor-
D8009 Practice for Manual Piston Cylinder Sampling for
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
Volatile Crude Oils, Condensates, and Liquid Petroleum
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Products
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
D8321 Practice for Development and Validation of Multi-
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
variate Analyses for Use in Predicting Properties of
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants based
on Spectroscopic Measurements
2. Referenced Documents
E131 Terminology Relating to Molecular Spectroscopy
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E1866 Guide for Establishing Spectrophotometer Perfor-
D86 Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products and
mance Tests
Liquid Fuels at Atmospheric Pressure
D1265 Practice for Sampling Liquefied Petroleum (LP)
3. Terminology
Gases, Manual Method
3.1 Definitions:
D2699 Test Method for Research Octane Number of Spark-
3.1.1 For definitions of terms used in this practice, refer to
Ignition Engine Fuel
Terminology D4175.
D2700 Test Method for Motor Octane Number of Spark-
3.1.2 For definitions of terms and symbols relating to IR
Ignition Engine Fuel
spectroscopy, refer to Terminology E131.
D3700 Practice for Obtaining LPG Samples Using a Float-
3.1.3 For definitions of terms and symbols relating to
ing Piston Cylinder
D3764 Practice forValidation of the Performance of Process multivariate calibration, refer to Practice D8321.
Stream Analyzer Systems
3.1.4 accepted reference value (ARV), n—value that serves
D4057 Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum and
as an agreed-upon reference for comparison and that is derived
Petroleum Products
as (1) a theoretical or established value, based on scientific
principles, (2) an assigned value, based on experimental work
of some national or international organization, such as the U.S.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), or (3)
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
a consensus value, based on collaborative experimental work
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website. under the auspices of a scientific or engineering group. D6596
D8340−22
3.1.5 analysis, n—in multivariate spectroscopic 3.1.15 general validation, n—a comprehensive evaluation
measurement,theprocessofapplyingthemultivariatemodelto of the agreement between the PPTMR and the PTMR done on
a spectrum, preprocessed as required, to predict a component a set of samples that adequately span the multivariate model
concentration value or property, the prediction being referred compositionspaceusingthestatisticalmethodologyofPractice
tohereinasaPredictedPrimaryTestMethodResult(PPTMR). D6708 to demonstrate all required criteria in D6708 are met,
D8321 and Rxy meets user requirements. D6122
3.1.6 analyzer, n—see analyzer system.
3.1.16 line sample—process material that can be safely
withdrawn from a sample port or associated facilities without
3.1.7 analyzer system, n—for equipment in the analysis of
significantly altering the property of interest so that the
liquid petroleum products and fuels, all piping, hardware,
materialcanbeusedtoperformanalyzersystemvalidation;the
computer, software, instrument, linear correlation or multivari-
material is withdrawn in accordance with Practices D1265,
ate model required to analyze a process or product sample; the
D3700, D4057, D4177, D5842, D7453,or D8009, whichever
analyzer system may also be referred to as the analyzer, or the
is applicable, during a period when the material flowing
total analyzer system. D3764
through the analyzer is of uniform quality and the analyzer
3.1.7.1 Discussion—Online analyzers that utilize extractive
results are practically constant. D3764
samplingincludesampleloop,sampleconditioningsystemand
excess sample return system. 3.1.16.1 Discussion—Line Samples are not limited to the
3.1.7.2 Discussion—At-line, field and laboratory analyzers sampling practices mentioned in the definition given in Prac-
include the instrument and all associated sample introduction tice D3764.
apparatuses.
3.1.17 linearly mixable, adj—property is deemed to be
3.1.8 calibration, n—in multivariate spectroscopic
linearly mixable in a mass or volume measurement unit if the
measurement, a process for creating a multivariate model
property of the mixed material can be calculated from the
relating component concentrations or sample properties to
quantities and properties of the materials used to produce the
spectra for a set of known samples, referred to as calibration
mixture. D6624
samples. D8321
3.1.17.1 Discussion—The general equations describing this
3.1.9 calibration samples, n—in multivariate spectroscopic linearly mixable attribute are as follows:
measurement, the set of samples with known (measured by the
A ·P 1A ·P 1A ·P 1A ·P 1.1A ·P
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 N N
P 5 (1)
PTM) component concentrations or property values that are
MIXED
A 1A 1A 1A 1.1A
1 2 3 4 N
used for creating a multivariate model. D8321
A 5 A 1A 1A 1A 1.1A (2)
MIXED 1 2 3 4 N
3.1.10 check sample, n—a single pure compound, or a
where:
known, reproducible mixture of compounds whose spectrum is
constant over time such that it can be used in a performance A = quantity of material, N,
N
test. D6122 P = property of material, N,
N
P = property of mixed material, and
MIXED
3.1.11 chemical property—a property of a material associ-
A = quantity of mixed material.
MIXED
ated with its elemental or molecular composition. D8321
3.1.11.1 Discussion—Examples of chemical properties
3.1.17.2 Discussion—Thematerialbeingmixedcanbefrom
include, but are not limited to sulfur content, benzene content,
the same process stream over time.
and aromatics content. D8321
3.1.18 liquid petroleum product and fuels, n—in relation to
3.1.12 control limits, n—limits on a control chart that are
multivariate spectroscopic analyzers and process analyzers,
used as criteria for signaling the need for action or for judging
any single-phase liquid material that is produced at a facility in
whether a set of data does or does not indicate a state of
the petroleum and petrochemical industries and will be in
statistical control. D6299
whole or in part of a petroleum product; it is inclusive of
3.1.13 fit-for-use, n—product, system, or service that is
biofuels, renewable fuels, blendstocks, alternative blendstocks,
suitable for its intended use. D6624
and additives.
3.1.13.1 Discussion—A fit-for-use measurement system
3.1.19 local validation, n—an evaluation of the agreement
provides an estimate of a property with a desired level of
between the PPTMR and PTMR done on a set of samples that
confidence that meets the intended use.
do not necessarily span the compositional space of the multi-
3.1.14 flow-proportioned average property value (FPAPV),
variate model so as to demonstrate that the agreement is
n—average property value of the collected material in the tank
consistent with expectations based on the multivariate model.
or vessel, calculated by using the flow-proportioned average
D6122
technique described in the practice of all measurements per-
3.1.20 multivariate calibration, n—an analyzer calibration
formed on aliquots of the material while it is flowing into the
that relates the spectrum at multiple wavelengths or frequen-
tank or vessel. D6624
cies to the physical, chemical, or quality parameters. D6122
3.1.14.1 Discussion—The term property as used in this
practicecanbethephysical,chemical,orperformanceproperty 3.1.21 multivariate model, n—the mathematical expression
measurementsasprovidedbyon-line,at-lineanalyzersystems, or the set of mathematical operations that relates component
or, can be the deviation of such measurements from a desired concentrations or properties to spectra for a set of calibration
value. samples. D8321
D8340−22
3.1.21.1 Discussion—The multivariate model includes any 3.2.5 PCR—principle component regression
preprocessingdonetothespectraorconcentrationorproperties
3.2.6 PLS—partial least squares regression
priortothedevelopmentofthecorrelationbetweenspectraand
3.2.7 PPTMR(s)—predicted primary test method result(s)
properties, and any post-processing done to the initially pre-
dicted results. D8321 3.2.8 PTM—primary test method
3.1.22 outlier detection methods, n—statistical tests which
3.2.9 PTMR(s)—primary test method result(s)
are conducted to determine if the analysis of a spectrum using
3.2.10 SEC—standard error of calibration
a multivariate model represents an interpolation of the model.
3.2.11 SQC—statistical quality control
D6122
3.2.12 VRM—validation reference material
3.1.23 performance property, n—a property of a material
which measures how well the material functions in its intended
3.3 Symbols:
use. D8321
3.3.1 h—leverage statistic
3.1.23.1 Discussion—Examples of performance properties
3.3.2 SEC—standard error of calibration; SEC(m) indicates
include research and motor octane numbers. D8321
SEC at property level m.
3.1.24 physical property, n—apropertyofmatternotinvolv-
3.3.3 t(p, dof)—student’s T-value at probability p for dof
ing in its manifestation a chemical change. D8321
degrees of freedom.
3.1.24.1 Discussion—Examples of physical properties
include, but are not limited to density, melting point, boiling
4. Summary of Practice
point, vapor pressure, flash point, cloud point, and pour point.
D8321
4.1 Procedures in existing ASTM standard practices and
additional prescriptive requirements are combined, allowing
3.1.25 post-processing, v—performing a mathematical op-
the user to qualify the use of vibrational spectroscopic-based
eration on an intermediate analyzer result to produce the final
analyzers to predict property values of applicable materials
result, including correcting for temperature effects, adding a
within a specified confidence.
meanpropertyvalueoftheanalyzercalibration,andconverting
4.1.1 Thespectroscopicmeasurementscoveredbythisprac-
into appropriate units for reporting purposes. D6122
tice are not limited to those in standardized test methods.
3.1.26 pre-processing, v—performing mathematical opera-
tions on raw spectral data prior to multivariate analysis or
4.2 The primary purpose of the qualification is to show at a
modeldevelopment,suchasselectingspectralregions,correct-
specified confidence that the results from the analyzer system
ing for baseline, smoothing, mean centering, and assigning
will be within limits when tested by the PTM.
weights to certain spectral positions. D6122
4.3 Statistical tests shall be applied to spectra to detect
3.1.27 predicted primary test method result(s) (PPTMR),
outliers (samples that are outside the dataset used to create the
n—result(s) from the analyzer system, after application of any
multivariate model, that is, when samples extrapolate the
necessary correlation, that is interpreted as predictions of what
multivariate model by having compositions outside the cali-
the primary test method results would have been, if it was
bration range, by having new unmodeled components, or a
conducted on the same material. D3764
spectrum is collected at significantly different temperature),
3.1.28 prediction, n—see predicted primary test method and to detect nearest neighbor distance inliers (samples whose
result (PPTMR). spectra are in voids in the multivariate calibration space).
PPTMRs for leverage and spectral outliers and nearest neigh-
3.1.29 primary test method (PTM), n—the analytical proce-
bor inliers are considered invalid and not included in the
dure used to generate the reference values against which the
performance evaluation. A limit on the amount of invalid
analyzer is both calibrated and validated. D3764
results is set. Practice D6624 requires valid PPTMRs for at
3.1.30 primary test method result (PTMR), n—test result
least90 %ofthematerialcollectedduringthebatch/blend,and
produced from an ASTM or other established standard test
givesdirectionforestimatingpropertyvaluesforthebalanceof
method that is accepted as the reference measure of a property.
the volume (up to 10 %) that did not have valid data.
D3764
4.4 Validation via Practice D6122 is required to show the
3.1.31 validation, n—for equipment in the analysis of liquid
degree of agreement between the Primary Test Method Results
petroleum products and fuels, the statistically quantified judg-
(PTMR) and Predicted Primary Test Method Result (PPTMR)
ment that the analyzer system or subsystem, in conjunction
is consistent with the expectations based on the multivariate
with any correlation applied, can produce acceptable precision
model Standard Error of Calibration (SEC).
and bias performance on the prediction deviations (δ for
4.4.1 Validation is required before initial use and as part of
materials that were not used to develop the correlation). D3764
a continual program.
3.2 Acronyms:
3.2.1 ARV—accepted reference value
5. Significance and Use
3.2.2 Mid-IR or MIR—mid-infrared
5.1 This practice is intended for use by parties interested in
3.2.3 MLR—multiple linear regression
releasing product by use of vibrational spectroscopic analyzer
3.2.4 NIR—near-infrared systems. It is expected to meet the industry need for a written
D8340−22
practical reference describing a scientifically systematic ap- frequency relative accuracy and reproducibility for any ana-
proach to show the degree of confidence and degree of lyzer the model is transferred to must be sufficient to allow
uncertaintyinanalyzerpredictedvaluesinrelationtothePTM. analyzers to be validated by Practice D6122.
6.3.3 Ambient temperature changes may affect some spec-
5.2 This is a performance-based practice that relies on the
troscopic measurements. Users may need to maintain constant
demonstrated quality of the test result and on strict adherence
environments around some analyzers.
to the referenced standards and the additional requirements in
this practice. 6.4 Sample system requirements for on-line and at-line
analyzers are as follows.
5.3 As part of demonstrating performance, this practice
6.4.1 The sample system shall be designed to provide a
incorporates by reference other ASTM standardized practices
representative sample to the analyzer system.
as key steps in the process.
6.4.2 Sample lag time/sample delivery system should be
5.4 There are prescriptive requirements included for this
considered if lab sample station and analyzer have a significant
practice.
lag difference. Practice D7453 is suggested for guidance.
5.4.1 The practice requires sample temperature to be care-
6.4.3 The sample system shall be designed to maintain the
fully controlled in analyzer system hardware or that effects of
sample stream at a single phase and sufficient fluid velocity to
temperature change be compensated in modeling or software.
make it through the sample system with a reasonable lag time.
5.4.2 Outlierdetectioncapabilityisrequiredfordemonstrat-
Practice D7453 is suggested for guidance.
ing the multivariate calibration model is applicable for the
6.4.4 The optical system of the analyzer can be either of a
analysis of the sample spectrum, that is, that the analysis
cell or probe type.
interpolates the model, that the sample does not contain a
NOTE 1—Some analyzers may not have an associated sample system.
statistically significant amount of unmodeled components
6.5 Sample temperature is critical to vibrational spectro-
aboveacertainlimitbasedonspectralresidualstatisticandthat
thesamplespectrumdoesnotfallwithingapinthemultivariate scopic analyzer performance and shall be addressed by one of
the following options. Changes in temperature can affect the
calibration space.
measured spectral intensities, resulting in changes to property
5.5 In order to follow this practice, all criteria must be met.
values predicted. Some intensity changes may be compensated
5.5.1 Theusershallinvestigatethecauseofnotmeetingthe
for in modeling.
practice requirements.
6.5.1 The user needs to establish the effects of temperature
5.5.2 For any nonconformities noticed, the user shall make
for their application. The sample stream is conditioned to
corrections to the analyzer system or procedures to conform to
within the determined acceptable temperature difference limits
the requirements of this practice.
from the user-defined specified temperature for the application,
according to user-defined accessories for the test. Some ana-
6. Apparatus and Considerations for Spectroscopy
lyzer systems or applications, or both, may require tighter
Measurements
temperature control in order to pass Practice D6122 validation.
6.1 This practice is applicable to:
6.5.1.1 A mathematical correction can be developed to
6.1.1 Spectroscopic analyzers measuring molecular vibra-
correct spectra or PPTMRs for temperature deviations from a
tions by infrared absorption (NIR or mid-IR, or both) and
specified temperature. For that sort of correction being applied
Raman scattering.
to the calibration spectra used during model development, the
6.1.2 Dispersive or Fourier-transform analyzers.
same temperature correction is applied to spectra of samples
being analyzed. Corrections can be applied to spectra or
6.2 Analyzer spectral resolution and signal-to-noise (S/N)
PPTMRs when using a model developed using spectra of
affect multivariate model performance, and the user needs to
samples collected at a specified temperature.
consider these in determining the analyzer requirements based
6.5.1.2 Effects of temperature fluctuations may be compen-
on the intended use. The analyzer resolution and S/N must be
sated for in the modeling.
sufficient to produce PPTMR with adequate precision and
6.5.1.3 A study may be conducted to generate data to
accuracy to pass the validation requirements.
demonstrate no significant temperature dependence above a
6.3 The analyzer sha
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: D8340 − 21 D8340 − 22
Standard Practice for
Performance-Based Qualification of Spectroscopic Analyzer
Systems
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D8340; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
Successful use of spectroscopic analyzers involves several activities, including sample introduction,
analyzer calibration, and analyzer validation. Many of these activities are covered in separate existing
documents, but not necessarily tied together therein. There are also activities not captured in existing
documents that are essential for spectroscopic methods. This practice is intended to pull these together
for users to employ and show the confidence in an analyzer system.
This practice is not limited to specific analyzers or applications. It does provide certain requirements
that analyzers, associated systems, and software must meet.
1. Scope*
1.1 This practice covers requirements for establishing performance-based qualification of vibrational spectroscopic analyzer
systems intended to be used to predict the test result of a material that would be produced by a Primary Test Method (PTM) if the
same material is tested by the PTM.
1.1.1 This practice provides methodology to establish the lower/upper prediction limits associated with the Predicted Primary Test
Method Result (PPTMR) in 1.1 with a specified degree of confidence that would contain the PTM result (if tested by the PTM).
1.1.2 The prediction limits in 1.1.1 can be used to estimate the confidence that product released using the analyzer system based
on a PPTMR that meets PTM-based specification limits will meet PTM-based specification limits when tested by a PTM.
1.2 The practice covers the qualification of on-line, at-line, or laboratory infrared or Raman analyzers used to predict physical,
chemical, or performance properties of liquid petroleum products and fuels. Infrared analyzers can operate in the near-infrared
(NIR) region, mid-infrared (MIR) region, or both.
1.2.1 This practice applies to all analyzer systems that can meet the performance requirements defined within.
1.2.2 This practice is not limited to analyzers designed by any specific instrument manufacturer.
1.2.3 This practice allows for multiple calibration techniques to create a multivariate model which relates the spectra produced
by the analyzer to the corresponding property determined by a PTM. Spectra can be used to predict multiple properties, but the
analyzer system performance of each predicted property is qualified individually.
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
D02.25 on Performance Assessment and Validation of Process Stream Analyzer Systems.
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2021Oct. 1, 2022. Published December 2021November 2022. Originally approved in 2020. Last previous edition approved in 20202021
as D8340 – 20a.D8340 – 21. DOI: 10.1520/D8340-21.10.1520/D8340-22.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D8340 − 22
1.3 The practice describes procedures for establishing performance requirements for analyzer system applications. The user of this
practice must establish written protocols to confirm the procedures are being followed.
1.4 This practice makes use of standard practices, guides, and methods already established in ASTM. Additional requirements are
listed within this practice.
1.5 Any multivariate model that meets performance requirements and detects when the spectrum of a sample is an outlier (analysis
that represents an extrapolation of the model) or a nearest neighbor distance inlier (a spectrum residing in a gap in the multivariate
space) can be used.
1.6 This practice can be used with methods for determining properties of biofuel blends. Three alternative procedures can be used.
In all three cases, the qualification of the predicted values for the blend are established and monitored as part of a continual program
by application of Practice D6122 or by combined application of Practices D6122 and D3764 (see definition in section 3.2.33.1.18).
1.6.1 If the analyzer is used to directly predict a property of the biofuel blend, and both the Primary Test Method Result (PTMR)
and Predicted Primary Test Method Result (PPTMR) are measured on the same material, then the analyzer is validated using
Practice D6122.
1.6.2 If the analyzer is used to directly predict a property of a blend stock to which a fixed level of biofuel material is added prior
to measurement by the PTM, and if the multivariate model correlates the spectrum of the blend stock to the PTMR for the fixed
level blend, then the analyzer is validated using Practice D6122.
1.6.3 If the analyzer directly predicts a property of a blend stock to which some amount of biofuel material is later added, then
Practice D6122 is used to validate the analyzer performance. If the PPTMR produced by the analyzer is input into a second model
to predict the property value for the final blend, based on the PPTMR for the blend stock and the blend level for the biofuel
material, then the performance of this second model is validated using Practice D3764.
1.7 Disclaimer of Liability as to Patented Inventions—Neither ASTM International nor an ASTM committee shall be responsible
for identifying all patents under which a license is required in using this document. ASTM International takes no position
respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard
are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are
entirely their own responsibility.
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.9 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D86 Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products and Liquid Fuels at Atmospheric Pressure
D1265 Practice for Sampling Liquefied Petroleum (LP) Gases, Manual Method
D2699 Test Method for Research Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel
D2700 Test Method for Motor Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel
D3700 Practice for Obtaining LPG Samples Using a Floating Piston Cylinder
D3764 Practice for Validation of the Performance of Process Stream Analyzer Systems
D4057 Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products
D4175 Terminology Relating to Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants
D4177 Practice for Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products
D5842 Practice for Sampling and Handling of Fuels for Volatility Measurement
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
D8340 − 22
D6122 Practice for Validation of the Performance of Multivariate Online, At-Line, Field and Laboratory Infrared
Spectrophotometer, and Raman Spectrometer Based Analyzer Systems
D6299 Practice for Applying Statistical Quality Assurance and Control Charting Techniques to Evaluate Analytical Measure-
ment System Performance
D6596 Practice for Ampulization and Storage of Gasoline and Related Hydrocarbon Materials
D6624 Practice for Determining a Flow-Proportioned Average Property Value (FPAPV) for a Collected Batch of Process Stream
Material Using Stream Analyzer Data
D6708 Practice for Statistical Assessment and Improvement of Expected Agreement Between Two Test Methods that Purport
to Measure the Same Property of a Material
D6792 Practice for Quality Management Systems in Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants Testing Laboratories
D7235 Guide for Establishing a Linear Correlation Relationship Between Analyzer and Primary Test Method Results Using
Relevant ASTM Standard Practices
D7453 Practice for Sampling of Petroleum Products for Analysis by Process Stream Analyzers and for Process Stream Analyzer
System Validation
D7808 Practice for Determining the Site Precision of a Process Stream Analyzer on Process Stream Material
D7825 Practice for Generating a Process Stream Property Value through Application of a Process Stream Analyzer
D8146D8009 Guide for Evaluating Test Method Capability and Fitness for UsePractice for Manual Piston Cylinder Sampling
for Volatile Crude Oils, Condensates, and Liquid Petroleum Products
D8321 Practice for Development and Validation of Multivariate Analyses for Use in Predicting Properties of Petroleum
Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants based on Spectroscopic Measurements
E131 Terminology Relating to Molecular Spectroscopy
E1655 Practices for Infrared Multivariate Quantitative Analysis
E1866 Guide for Establishing Spectrophotometer Performance Tests
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 For definitions of terms used in this practice, refer to Terminology D4175.
3.1.2 For definitions of terms and symbols relating to IR spectroscopy, refer to Terminology E131.
3.1.3 For definitions of terms and symbols relating to multivariate calibration, refer to Practice D8321.
3.1.4 accepted reference value (ARV), n—value that serves as an agreed-upon reference for comparison and that is derived as (1)
a theoretical or established value, based on scientific principles, (2) an assigned value, based on experimental work of some
national or international organization, such as the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), or (3) a consensus
value, based on collaborative experimental work under the auspices of a scientific or engineering group. D6596
3.1.5 analysis, n—in the context of this practice,multivariate spectroscopic measurement, the process of applying the
calibrationmultivariate model to a spectrum, preprocessed as required, so as to estimatepredict a component concentration value
or property. property, the prediction being referred to herein as a Predicted Primary Test Method Result (PPTMR). E1655D8321
3.1.6 analyzer, n—allsee piping, hardware, analyzer system.computer, software, instrumentation and calibration model required to
automatically perform the analysis of a process or product stream. D6122
3.1.7 analyzer system, n—the complete for equipment in the analysis of liquid petroleum products and fuels,analyzer system
inclusive of the sample loop, sample conditioning unit, analyzer unit, readout instrumentation, and excess sample return system
(see Fig. 1 from Practice all piping, hardware, computer, software, instrument, linear correlation or multivariate model required
to analyze a process or product sample; the analyzer system may also be referred to as the analyzer, or the total analyzer
system.D3764 for example). D3764
3.1.7.1 Discussion—
Online analyzers that utilize extractive sampling include sample loop, sample conditioning system and excess sample return
system.
3.1.7.2 Discussion—
At-line, field and laboratory analyzers include the instrument and all associated sample introduction apparatuses.
D8340 − 22
3.1.8 calibration, n—in multivariate spectroscopic measurement, a process for creating a multivariate model relating component
concentrations or sample properties to spectra for a set of known samples, referred to as calibration samples. D8321
3.1.9 calibration samples, n—in multivariate spectroscopic measurement, the set of reference samples used for creating a
calibration model. Reference component concentration or property values are samples with known (measured by reference method)
for the calibration samples and a calibration model is found which relates these values to the spectra during the calibration.the
PTM) component concentrations or property values that are used for creating a multivariate model. E1655D8321
3.1.10 check sample, n—a single pure compound, or a known, reproducible mixture of compounds whose spectrum is constant
over time such that it can be used in a performance test. D6122
3.1.11 chemical property—a property of a material associated with its elemental or molecular composition. D8321
3.1.11.1 Discussion—
Examples of chemical properties include, but are not limited to sulfur content, benzene content, and aromatics content. D8321
3.1.12 control limits, n—limits on a control chart that are used as criteria for signaling the need for action or for judging whether
a set of data does or does not indicate a state of statistical control. D6299
3.1.10 estimate, n—the value for a component concentration or property obtained by applying the calibration model for the
analysis of an absorption spectrum. E1655
3.1.13 fit for use, fit-for-use, n—an expression of the adequacy of a test method to provide a precise estimate of the intended
parameter with a desired level of confidence at the level of a corresponding specification, regulatory, or manufacturing limit to
support compliance decision.product, system, or service that is suitable for its intended use. D8146D6624
3.1.13.1 Discussion—
Fit for use is the effectiveness of an analytical measurement system to adequately meet the precision requirements for the intended
application relative to specific limits.A fit-for-use measurement system provides an estimate of a property with a desired level of
confidence that meets the intended use.
3.1.14 flow-proportioned average property value (FPAPV), n—average property value of the collected material in the tank or
vessel, calculated by using the flow-proportioned average technique described in the practice of all measurements performed on
aliquots of the material while it is flowing into the tank or vessel. D6624
3.1.14.1 Discussion—
The term property as used in this practice can be the physical, chemical, or performance property measurements as provided by
on-line, at-line analyzer systems, or, can be the deviation of such measurements from a desired value.
3.1.15 general validation, n—a comprehensive evaluation of the agreement between the PPTMR and the PTMR done on a set of
samples that adequately span the multivariate model composition.composition space using the statistical methodology of Practice
D6708 to demonstrate all required criteria in D6708 are met, and Rxy meets user requirements. D6122
3.1.16 line sample—a process or product sample which isprocess material that can be safely withdrawn from a sample port or
associated facilities without significantly altering the property of interest so that the material can be used to perform analyzer
system validation; the material is withdrawn in accordance with Practices D1265, D3700, D4057, D4177, D5842or, D7453, or
D8009, whichever is applicable, during a period when the material flowing through the analyzer is of uniform quality and the
analyzer result is essentiallyresults are practically constant. D6122D3764
3.1.16.1 Discussion—
Line Samples are not limited to the sampling practices mentioned in the definition given in Practice D6122D3764.
3.1.17 linearly mixable, adj—property is deemed to be linearly mixable in a mass or volume measurement unit if the property of
the mixed material can be calculated from the quantities and properties of the materials used to produce the mixture. D6624
3.1.17.1 Discussion—
The general equations describing this linearly mixable attribute are as follows:
A ·P 1A ·P 1A ·P 1A ·P 1.1A ·P
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 N N
P 5 (1)
MIXED
A 1A 1A 1A 1.1A
1 2 3 4 N
D8340 − 22
A 5 A 1A 1A 1A 1.1A (2)
MIXED 1 2 3 4 N
where:
A = quantity of material, N,
N
P = property of material, N,
N
P = property of mixed material, and
MIXED
A = quantity of mixed material.
MIXED
3.1.17.2 Discussion—
The material being mixed can be from the same process stream over time.
3.1.18 liquid petroleum product and fuels, n—in relation to multivariate spectroscopic analyzers and process analyzers, any
single-phase liquid material that is produced at a facility in the petroleum and petrochemical industries and will be in whole or
in part of a petroleum product; it is inclusive of biofuels, renewable fuels, blendstocks, alternative blendstocks, and additives.
3.1.19 local validation, n—an evaluation of the agreement between the PPTMR and PTMR done on a set of samples that do not
necessarily span the compositional space of the multivariate model so as to demonstrate that the agreement is consistent with
expectations based on the multivariate model. D6122
3.1.20 multivariate calibration, n—an analyzer calibration that relates the spectrum at multiple wavelengths or frequencies to the
physical, chemical, or quality parameters. D6122
3.1.21 multivariate model, n—the mathematical expression or the set of mathematical operations that relates component
concentrations or properties to spectra for a set of calibration samples. D8321
3.1.21.1 Discussion—
The multivariate model includes any preprocessing done to the spectra or concentration or properties prior to the development of
the correlation between spectra and properties, and any post-processing done to the initially predicted results. D8321
3.1.22 outlier detection methods, n—statistical tests which are conducted to determine if the analysis of a spectrum using a
multivariate model represents an interpolation of the model. D6122
3.1.23 performance property, n—a property of a material which measures how well the material functions in its intended use.
D8321
3.1.23.1 Discussion—
Examples of performance properties include research and motor octane numbers. D8321
3.1.24 physical property, n—a property of matter not involving in its manifestation a chemical change. D8321
3.1.24.1 Discussion—
Examples of physical properties include, but are not limited to density, melting point, boiling point, vapor pressure, flash point,
cloud point, and pour point. D8321
3.1.25 post-processing, v—performing a mathematical operation on an intermediate analyzer result to produce the final result,
including correcting for temperature effects, adding a mean property value of the analyzer calibration, and converting into
appropriate units for reporting purposes. D6122
3.1.26 pre-processing, v—performing mathematical operations on raw spectral data prior to multivariate analysis or model
development, such as selecting wave length spectral regions, correcting for baseline, smoothing, mean centering, and assigning
weights to certain spectral positions. D6122
3.1.27 predicted primary test method result(s) (PPTMR), n—result(s) from the analyzer system, after application of any necessary
correlation, that is interpreted as predictions of what the primary test method results would have been, if it was conducted on the
same material. D3764
3.1.28 prediction, n—see predicted primary test method result (PPTMR).
D8340 − 22
3.1.29 primary test method (PTM), n—the analytical procedure used to generate the reference values against which the analyzer
is both calibrated and validated. D7235D3764
3.1.30 primary test method result (PTMR), n—test result produced from an ASTM or other established standard test method that
is accepted as the reference measure of a property. D6122D3764
3.1.24 predicted primary test method result (PPTMR), n—result from the analyzer system, after application of any necessary
correlation, that is interpreted as predictions of what the primary test method results would have been, if it was conducted on the
same material. D6122
3.1.31 validation, n—for equipment in the analysis of liquid petroleum products and fuels, the statistically quantified judgment that
the analyzer system or subsystem being assessed can produce predicted PTM results withsubsystem, in conjunction with any
correlation applied, can produce acceptable precision and bias performance when compared to actual results from a primary test
method measurement system for common materials.on the prediction deviations (δ for materials that were not used to develop the
correlation). D7453D3764
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 calibration, n—the practice of creating a univariate or multivariate linear relationship between one or more wavelengths (or
wavenumbers) from a set of spectra and a physical, chemical, or a performance property.
3.2.2 chemical property, n—the concentration of a select component per unit volume or unit mass of a sample.
3.2.2.1 Discussion—
Example: volume percent total aromatics in gasoline.
3.2.3 liquid petroleum product and fuels, n—for the purposes of this standard, any single-phase liquid material that is produced
at a facility in the petroleum and petrochemical industries and will be in whole or in part of a petroleum product; it is inclusive
of biofuels, renewable fuels, blendstocks, alternative blendstocks, and additives.
3.2.4 performance property, n—a rating value determined by a test method for a specified characteristic related to the intended use
of the sample being tested.
3.2.4.1 Discussion—
Example: octane ratings of gasoline.
3.2.5 physical property, n—a measurable property that relates a condition of the sample.
3.2.5.1 Discussion—
Example: relative density of diesel fuel.
3.2 Acronyms:
3.2.1 ARV—accepted reference value
3.2.2 Mid-IR or MIR—mid-infrared
3.2.3 MLR—multiple linear regression
3.2.4 NIR—near-infrared
3.2.5 PCR—principle component regression
3.2.6 PLS—partial least squares regression
3.2.7 PPTMR(s)—predicted primary test method result(s)
3.2.8 PTM—primary test method
D8340 − 22
3.2.9 PTMR(s)—primary test method result(s)
3.2.10 SEC—standard error of calibration
3.2.11 SQC—statistical quality control
3.2.12 VRM—validation reference material
3.3 Symbols:
3.3.1 h—leverage statistic
3.3.2 SEC—standard error of calibration; SEC(m) indicates SEC at property level m.
3.3.3 t(p, dof)—student’s T-value at probability p for dof degrees of freedom.
4. Summary of Practice
4.1 Procedures in existing ASTM standard practices and additional prescriptive requirements are combined, allowing the user to
qualify the use of vibrational spectroscopic-based analyzers to predict property values of applicable materials within a specified
confidence.
4.1.1 The spectroscopic measurements covered by this practice are not limited to those in standardized test methods.
4.2 The primary purpose of the qualification is to show at a specified confidence that the results from the analyzer system will be
within limits when tested by the PTM.
4.3 Statistical tests shall be applied to spectra to detect outliers (samples that are outside the dataset used to create the multivariate
model, that is, when samples extrapolate the multivariate model by having compositions outside the calibration range, by having
new unmodeled components, or a spectrum is collected at significantly different temperature), and to detect nearest neighbor
distance inliers (samples whose spectra are in voids in the multivariate calibration space). PPTMRs for leverage and spectral
outliers and nearest neighbor inliers are considered invalid and not included in the performance evaluation. A limit on the amount
of invalid results is set. Practice D6624 requires valid PPTMRs for at least 90 % of the material collected during the batch/blend,
and gives direction for estimating property values for the balance of the volume (up to 10 %) that did not have valid data.
4.4 Validation via Practice D6122 is required to show the degree of agreement between the Primary Test Method Results (PTMR)
and Predicted Primary Test Method Result (PPTMR) is consistent with the expectations based on the multivariate model Standard
Error of Calibration (SEC).
4.4.1 Validation is required before initial use and as part of a continual program.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 This practice is intended for use by parties interested in releasing product by use of vibrational spectroscopic analyzer systems.
It is expected to meet the industry need for a written practical reference describing a scientifically systematic approach to show
the degree of confidence and degree of uncertainty in analyzer predicted values in relation to the PTM.
5.2 This is a performance-based practice that relies on the demonstrated quality of the test result and on strict adherence to the
referenced standards and the additional requirements in this practice.
5.3 As part of demonstrating performance, this practice incorporates by reference other ASTM standardized practices as key steps
in the process.
5.4 There are prescriptive requirements included for this practice.
D8340 − 22
5.4.1 The practice requires sample temperature to be carefully controlled in analyzer system hardware or that effects of
temperature change be compensated in modeling or software.
5.4.2 Outlier detection capability is required for demonstrating the multivariate calibration model is applicable for the analysis of
the sample spectrum, that is, that the analysis interpolates the model, that the sample does not contain a statistically significant
amount of unmodeled components above a certain limit based on spectral residual statistic and that the sample spectrum does not
fall within gap in the multivariate calibration space.
5.5 In order to follow this practice, all criteria must be met.
5.5.1 The user shall investigate the cause of not meeting the practice requirements.
5.5.2 For any nonconformities noticed, the user shall make corrections to the analyzer system or procedures to conform to the
requirements of this practice.
6. Apparatus and Considerations for Spectroscopy Measurements
6.1 This practice is applicable to:
6.1.1 Spectroscopic analyzers measuring molecular vibrations by infrared absorption (NIR or mid-IR, or both) and Raman
scattering.
6.1.2 Dispersive or Fourier-transform analyzers.
6.2 Analyzer spectral resolution and signal-to-noise (S/N) affect multivariate model performance, and the user needs to consider
these in determining the analyzer requirements based on the intended use. The analyzer resolution and S/N must be sufficient to
produce PPTMR with adequate precision and accuracy to pass the validation requirements.
6.3 The analyzer shall include a means of demonstrating that it is operating within the vendor’s specification.
6.3.1 The analyzer shall incorporate instrument performance tests to demonstrate that it is operating within historically expected
limits.
6.3.2 The analyzer shall have a means of validating wavelength/frequency precision and accuracy relative to the calibration
analyzer.
6.3.2.1 The wavelength/frequency precision must be sufficient to allow spectra to be collected and used in creating a multivariate
model that meets or exceeds user’s specifications.
6.3.2.2 The wavelength/frequency precision of the analyzer used for calibration and the between analyzer wavelength frequency
relative accuracy and reproducibility for any analyzer the model is transferred to must be sufficient to allow analyzers to be
validated by Practice D6122.
6.3.3 Ambient te
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...