SIST EN 50527-1:2010

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-september-2010
Postopek ocenjevanja izpostavljenosti delavcev z aktivnimi medicinskimi vsadki
elektromagnetnim poljem - 1. del: Splošno
Procedure for the assessment of the exposure to electromagnetic fields of workers
bearing active implantable medical devices - Part 1: General
Verfahren zur Beurteilung der Exposition von Arbeitnehmern mit aktiven implantierbaren
medizinischen Geräten (AIMD) gegenüber elektromagnetischen Feldern - Teil 1:
Allgemeine Festlegungen
Procédure pour l’évaluation de l’exposition des travailleurs porteurs de dispositifs
médicaux implantables actifs aux champs électromagnétiques - Partie 1: Généralités
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 50527-1:2010
ICS:
11.040.40 Implantanti za kirurgijo, Implants for surgery,
protetiko in ortetiko prosthetics and orthotics
13.100 Varnost pri delu. Industrijska Occupational safety.
higiena Industrial hygiene
17.240 Merjenje sevanja Radiation measurements
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EUROPEAN STANDARD
EN 50527-1
NORME EUROPÉENNE
April 2010
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 11.040.40; 13.100; 13.280
English version
Procedure for the assessment of the exposure to electromagnetic fields
of workers bearing active implantable medical devices -
Part 1: General
Procédure pour l’évaluation de l’exposition Verfahren zur Beurteilung der Exposition
des travailleurs porteurs de dispositifs von Arbeitnehmern mit aktiven
médicaux implantables actifs aux champs implantierbaren medizinischen Geräten
électromagnétiques - (AIMD) gegenüber elektromagnetischen
Partie 1 : Généralités Feldern -
Teil 1: Allgemeine Festlegungen

This European Standard was approved by CENELEC on 2010-02-01. CENELEC members are bound to comply
with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard
the status of a national standard without any alteration.

Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on
application to the Central Secretariat or to any CENELEC member.

This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other
language made by translation under the responsibility of a CENELEC member into its own language and notified
to the Central Secretariat has the same status as the official versions.

CENELEC members are the national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus,
the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy,
Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

CENELEC
European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization
Comité Européen de Normalisation Electrotechnique
Europäisches Komitee für Elektrotechnische Normung

Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B - 1000 Brussels

© 2010 CENELEC - All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CENELEC members.
Ref. No. EN 50527-1:2010 E
Foreword
This European Standard was prepared by the Technical Committee CENELEC TC 106X,
Electromagnetic fields in the human environment. The text of the draft was submitted to the formal vote
and was approved by CENELEC as EN 50527-1 on 2010-02-01.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN and CENELEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent
rights.
The following dates were fixed:
– latest date by which the EN has to be implemented
at national level by publication of an identical
national standard or by endorsement (dop) 2011-02-01
– latest date by which the national standards conflicting
with the EN have to be withdrawn (dow) 2013-02-01
This European Standard has been prepared under Mandate M/351 given to CENELEC by the European
Commission and the European Free Trade Association and covers essential requirements of
EC Directive 2004/40/EC.
The human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) is regulated at European level in a twofold way. For
the general public, Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC stipulates maximum exposure limits based on
the ICNIRP guidelines. Nevertheless, Article 153 of the European treaty grants the member states the
right to set stricter limit values in their obligation to govern public health and safety.
For occupational exposure directive (2004/40/EC) as individual physical agents directive issued under the
occupational health and safety framework directive 89/391/EEC sets the minimum health and safety
requirements based on the maximum occupational exposure limits of the ICNIRP guidelines.
Common to both directives limiting human exposure to EMF and to the ICNIRP guidelines is the fact that
their limit values are based on direct effects of EMF exposure to the human body. For the low frequency
range the induced current density in the nervous system is the limiting factor whereas in the higher
frequency area tissue heating by absorption has to be limited.
The occupational exposure directive 2004/40/EC in Article 4.5 additionally obliges the employer to
investigate during the risk assessment process also indirect effects like interference with medical
electronic equipment and devices (including cardiac pacemakers and other implanted devices).
Risks to the bearer may be caused by different effects:
– a conductive implant may directly cause an increase of current density in the body tissue surrounding
the implant, or
– the behaviour of the device may be interfered with (for examples see D.8).
The possibility of interference to the device depends on the EMF exposure level and the electromagnetic
performance of the device, its settings and the method of implantation. The clinical relevance of
interference may depend on the duration of exposure.
The main objective of this standard is to describe how a risk assessment for an employee bearing one or
more active implantable medical devices (AIMD-Employee) in electromagnetic fields may be performed.
A first step consists of a simplified risk analysis, followed where necessary, by a more extensive risk
assessment.
– 3 – EN 50527-1:2010
Directives 90/385/EEC and 2007/47/EC on medical devices requires that AIMDs are designed and
manufactured in such a way as to remove or minimize as far as possible risks connected with reasonably
foreseeable environmental conditions such as magnetic fields, external electromagnetic interference
effects, and electrostatic discharge.
EN 50499 introduces a concept of identifying equipment not likely to cause exposure to EMF above the
limit values. This standard follows this approach but some of the identified equipment for general purpose
assessment may need further analysis for AIMD-Employee. For higher frequency exposures, human
body tissue has a time constant with respect to heating effects and a high immunity to pulsating
exposure, whereas the electronic circuitry of an implant may be interfered with even by short pulses.
__________
Contents
1 Scope . 6
2 Relationship to other standards . 6
3 References . 7
3.1 Normative references . 7
3.2 Regulatory references . 7
4 Terms and definitions . 8
5 Risk assessment . 9
5.1 Risk assessment procedure . 9
5.2 Documentation and information for the AIMD-Employee . 13
5.3 Maintaining the risk assessment . 13
6 Equipment at workplaces . 13
7 Special cases . 18
8 AIMD-Employees with more than one AIMD . 18
9 Documentation . 18
Annex A (normative) Specific risk assessment . 19
A.1 General . 19
A.2 Non-clinical approach. 19
A.3 Clinical approach . 20
A.4 Documentation of the specific assessment. . 20
Annex B (informative) Documenting the risk assessment . 22
B.1 Introduction . 22
B.2 Workplace compliance documentation form . 22
B.3 Previously uninfluenced behaviour . 24
B.4 Documenting the detailed risk assessment . 25
Annex C (informative) Specific electromagnetic environments. 28
C.1 Railways . 28
C.2 Workplace power transmission and distribution . 28
C.3 Broadcasting . 30
Annex D (informative) Theoretical considerations . 31
D.1 Introduction . 31
D.2 Brief summary of exposure limits for persons without implant . 31
D.3 General considerations about electromagnetic fields . 34
D.4 General considerations about AIMDs . 35
D.5 Description of electromagnetic interference effects . 36
D.6 Model to assess the possibility of induction of AIMD response . 36
D.7 Possibility of induced AIMD response. 37
D.8 Clinical relevance of AIMD response . 38
Bibliography . 39

– 5 – EN 50527-1:2010
Figures
Figure 1 – Relationship of standards . 7
Figure 2 – Risk assessment process . 12
Figure D.1 – Reference levels for whole body exposure according to 1999/519/EC. 33
Figure D.2 – Field strength – Distance ratio . 34
Figure D.3 – Near field – far field transition for sources smaller than half wavelength in size . 34
Figure D.4 – Entire model to assess the possibility of induction of AIMD response . 36
Figure D.5 – Simplified model to assess the possibility of AIMD response in special cases . 37

Tables
Table 1 – Compliant workplaces and equipment with exceptions. 14
Table C.1 – Summary of maximum field values beneath high-voltage overhead lines . 29

1 Scope
The scope of this European Standard is to provide a procedure in order to assess the risk to workers
bearing one or more active implantable medical devices from exposure to electric, magnetic and
electromagnetic fields at a workplace. It specifies how to perform a general risk assessment and to
determine whether it is necessary to carry out a detailed risk assessment.
NOTE 1 This European Standard does not cover indirect effects caused by non active implants.
NOTE 2 The the risk of human exposure to EMF considered is only due to malfunctioning of AIMD. Possibilities of AIMD
contribution to the risk: e.g. local modification of the distribution of EMF produced by external source or production of own EMF are
covered by the respective product standards for the AIMD.
Based on specific workplace standards it can be determined whether preventive measures/actions must
be taken to comply with the provisions of Directive 2004/40/EC. The work situation covered is considered
to be under normal working conditions including normal operation, maintenance, cleaning and other
situations being part of the normal work.
The frequencies covered are from 0 Hz to 300 GHz.
NOTE 3 The European Parliament and Council Directive 2004/40/EC will be transposed into national legislation in all the EU
member countries. It is recommended that users of this standard consult the national legislation related to this transposition in order
to identify the national regulations and requirements. These national regulations and requirements may have additional
requirements that are not covered by this standard and take precedence.
NOTE 4 Performance requirements with respect to active implantable medical devices are excluded from the scope of this
standard. These are defined in the relevant particular standards for active implantable medical devices.
NOTE 5 This standard is written under mandate M/351 and relates to the exposure limits as specified in the Directive 2004/40/EC
which is intended to protect workers from risks to their health and safety arising or likely to arise from exposure to electromagnetic
fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz) during their work. However, this and other directives may include additional measures for the protection of
specific groups of workers and/or specific workplaces for which the employer is required to investigate other protective measures as
a part of the overall risk assessment.
2 Relationship to other standards
This European Standard complements the workers exposure assessment standard EN 50499.
It provides the general methodology for doing the risk assessment for employees bearing an AIMD at the
workplace.
AIMDs are regulated by Directive 90/385/EEC amended by Directive 2007/47/EC.
NOTE Product standards EN 45502-1 and of the EN 45502-2-X series describe the product requirements for different kinds of
AIMDs. Different kinds of AIMDs are e.g. pacemaker (EN 45502-2-1), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (EN 45502-2-2),
cochlear implants (EN 45502-2-3), implantable neurostimulators (ISO/PRF 14708-3), implantable infusion pumps (ISO/PRF 14708-
4)
In situations where the risk assessment following this standard does not lead to a conclusion,
complementary provisions for the assessment of workers exposure for different kinds of AIMDs are given
in particular standards for these specific AIMDs (see Figure 1).

– 7 – EN 50527-1:2010
Other standards
or requirements
EN 50499
may call up the s
Determination of workers exposure to electromagnetic fields tandard directly
EN 50527-1
General part covering indirect effects caused by
interference with all kinds of AIMD and generic
items for subsequent standards for specific AIMD

Figure 1 – Relationship of standards
3 References
3.1 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced
document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 50499:2008, Procedure for the assessment of the exposure of workers to electromagnetic fields
3.2 Regulatory references
Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage
improvements in the safety and health of workers at work, Official Journal L 183, 29/06/1989, p. 1 – 8
Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States
relating to active implantable medical devices, Official Journal L 189, 20/07/1990, p. 17–36
1999/519/EC: Council Recommendation of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general
public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz), Official Journal L 199, 30/07/1999, p. 59 - 70
Specific workplace exposure standard
e.g. railways (EN 50500)
Specific workplace exposure standard e.g. welding

EN 50527-2-1, Pacemaker specific
Part: Cardiac pacemakers
EN 50527-2-2, ICD specific Part
EN 50527-2-X, Specific part
Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the minimum
health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical
agents (electromagnetic fields) (18th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive
89/391/EEC), Official Journal L 159, 30/04/2004, p. 1–26
Directive 2007/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 amending
Council Directive 90/385/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active
implantable medical devices, Council Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices and Directive
98/8/EC concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market, Official Journal L 247, 21/09/2007,
p. 21–55
4 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
4.1
AIMD-Employee
an employee bearing one or more AIMDs
4.2
interference distance
a distance identified for a piece of equipment, outside of which distance an AIMD-Employee can work
normally. This is also used in the same way to identify the closest distance an item of portable equipment
can be, while the AIMD-Employee can work normally. At closer distances the AIMD-Employee may still
be allowed to work normally, but this requires a specific assessment for that situation; or transient
exposure may be possible provided warnings against this have not been received by the AIMD-Employee
NOTE 1 Sometimes this distance is quoted as a “safety distance” but it must not be confused with the safety distances identified
for general EMF exposure of all employees in the workplace. At these general EMF safety distances the fields may be high enough
to cause response changes or other effects to an AIMD.
4.3
medical device
means any instrument, apparatus, appliance, software, material or other article, whether used alone or in
combination, together with any accessories, including the software intended by its manufacturer to be
used specifically for diagnostic and/or therapeutic purposes and necessary for its proper application,
intended by the manufacturer to be used for human beings for the purpose of
• diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease,
• diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of or compensation for an injury or handicap,
• investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or of a physiological process,
• control of conception,
and which does not achieve its principal intended action in or on the human body by pharmacological,
immunological or metabolic means, but which may be assisted in its function by such means
[from 2007/47/EC]
4.4
active medical device
any medical device relying for its functioning on a source of electrical energy or any source of power other
than that directly generated by the human body or gravity
[from 90/385/EEC]
– 9 – EN 50527-1:2010
4.5
active implantable medical device (AIMD)
any active medical device which is intended to be totally or partially introduced, surgically or medically, into the
human body or by medical intervention into a natural orifice, and which is intended to remain after the
procedure
[from 90/385/EEC]
4.6
responsible physician
physician responsible for the implantation and/or follow up monitoring of the AIMD
4.7
transient exposure
exposure to electromagnetic fields which
• is not continuous and coming to an end or reducing to non influential levels
• does not damage the AIMD
• only leads to acceptable response of the AIMD based on the advice from the responsible
physician (for example by general guidance or by a specific warning) and/or described in the
documentation accompanying the AIMD.
Such exposure may be caused by the electromagnetic field being temporary or by the exposed person
moving within, or through, an electromagnetic field
4.8
workplace
location where workers have access as part of their duties or during their breaks and all pathways that
have to be used to reach these
5 Risk assessment
5.1 Risk assessment procedure
5.1.1 Introduction
The occupational health and safety framework directive 89/391/EEC requires in Article 15 about Risk
groups:
“Particularly sensitive risk groups must be protected against the dangers which specifically affect them.”
The interference of EMF with implanted AIMD is identified as being an indirect effect causing particular
risk within the scope of Article 4.5(d) of Directive 2004/40/EC.
Figure 2 gives a schematic overview of the risk assessment process.
NOTE 1  In case of doubt the relevant authorities in accordance with national law should be involved.
The first step in the risk assessment is the identification of AIMD-Employees. According to Article 13.2(f)
of Directive 89/391/EEC the worker is obliged to co-operate with the employer to identify possible risks,
like the possible interference of the AIMD with EMF at the workplace. The privacy of employees’ medical
data may lead to situations in which the employer is not or not fully aware of which employees are AIMD-
Employees and to what extent they have to be considered to be workers at particular risk.

NOTE 2  Quote from Directive 89/391/EEC, Article 13:
“ 2. To this end, workers must in particular, in accordance with their training and the instructions given by their employer:
…
(f) cooperate, in accordance with national practice, with the employer and/or workers with specific responsibility for the safety
and health of workers, for as long as may be necessary to enable the employer to ensure that the working environment and
working conditions are safe and pose no risk to safety and health within their field of activity.”
When no AIMD-Employees are identified the risk assessment following this standard ends. Document
that no AIMD-Employee is present unless this has already been documented as part of the general EMF
worker assessment.
For some types of workplaces the EMF risk assessment is covered by a specific workplace standard. If
such a standard is used for risk assessment then the presentation of the result should normally be done
in accordance with that standard.
Special considerations are often needed when it comes to the assessment of work that takes place
outside the employer’s premises. It is generally advised that the employer trains AIMD-Employees to be
aware of particular risks that they might encounter during their work. This could be, for example, in
situations where craftsmen like bricklayers, plumbers and carpenters do maintenance work on chimneys,
rooftops, etc. where radio transmission or other transmitting antennas could be installed.
AIMD-Employees should be instructed on how to deal with such equipment in a safe manner. Generally
this means that AIMD-Employees are informed about the interference distances or zones of such
equipment. If the safety information is not provided in a sign at the site, it can be requested from the
owner of the equipment. However, it is the employer’s responsibility that AIMD-employees have the right
information on every workplace that they visit.
5.1.2 Workplace equipment
The risk assessment is based on the approach that AIMDs are expected to work uninfluenced as long as
the General Public Reference levels of 1999/519/EC (except for static magnetic fields) are not exceeded
[2007/47/EC ] [2] [3] [4], where the AIMD has been implanted and programmed following good medical
practice [9] [10]. This risk assessment therefore checks both for fields present at the workplace that
exceed these levels and for AIMD-Employees that are subject to lower immunity of their AIMD due to
clinical reasons.
The risk assessment continues by checking the equipment present at the workplace. Equipment listed in
Table 1 may be assumed to produce fields that do not exceed the General Public reference levels. If
there is equipment present that is not listed in Table 1 or is not used as specified in the remarks in
Table 1 it must be assumed that the electric, magnetic or electromagnetic field levels may be too high to
guarantee uninfluenced behaviour of the AIMD. In this case a specific assessment following Annex A
shall be performed.
If all equipment at the workplace is listed in Table 1 and is used as specified in the remarks in Table 1 it is
necessary to find out whether the AIMD-Employee has received specific warnings from the responsible
physician. Such specific warnings are based on the fact that the immunity of the implant under the
condition of implantation and parameter setting is not compatible with General Public reference levels.
If the AIMD worker is being exposed to static magnetic fields of flux density > 1mT, some types of AIMD
such as pacemakers, ICDs, neurostimulator, etc. may respond to the field by switching to a clinically
acceptable behavior for short exposure. It is not advisable, however, to have the worker exposed to such
fields for long periods of time (i.e. over several seconds). This 1mT limit also applies for “quasi static“
magnetic fields in the frequency range from 0 to 1Hz (or up to a few Hz).
NOTE Such magnetic filelds may be occur in industries using DC applications (e.g. electrolysis) or may be caused by equipment
using permanent magnets like e.g. loud speakers or ear phones.

– 11 – EN 50527-1:2010
5.1.3 Previously uninfluenced behaviour
The assessment effort can be reduced by checking whether or not the AIMD-Employee has worked within
the current role without experiencing clinically significant effects even though not all equipment present at
the workplace is listed in Table 1.
If this is so, it can proportionately be assumed that the residual risk is acceptable as long as
• the AIMD-Employee has experienced all reasonably foreseeable exposure situations,
• no new equipment is brought into the workplace,
• no changes to the AIMD configuration are made,
• no changes in the therapy indication are given.
NOTE If previously uninfluenced behaviour is assumed, it should be considered that this approach does not provide any safety
margin. Therefore this approach might be suitable only if tolerable interference (i.e. acoustic sound in a cochlear implant) is
expected. If severe interaction might be possible (i.e. delivery of an inappropriate therapy of an implanted defibrillator) this approach
is not recommended.
Documentation of the result and AIMD-Employee’s information shall be performed as described in 5.2.
5.1.4 Specific warnings
All AIMD-Employees receive from their AIMD physician general warnings to avoid situations in which risk
of interference may occur such as for example mobile phones must not be used closer than a specified
distance from the AIMD and not to use motor-operated equipment immediately adjacent to the
implantation site. Such warnings are not considered specific warnings but must nevertheless be followed.
Specific warnings are instructions given by the responsible physician caused by the configuration of the
AIMD, its settings or clinical conditions of the patient which are more stringent than the warnings every
AIMD Employee receives, including any warning in the manual that the AIMD is not covered by a
harmonized standard or that the requirements of a harmonised standard are not fulfilled.
When an AIMD-Employee has received such specific warnings a specific assessment following Annex A
shall be performed. If the AIMD-Employee has not received such specific warnings the result and AIMD-
Employees information shall be documented as described in 5.2.

Start of EN 50527-1
assessment
no
Are there any
AIMD-Employee?
yes
Is only
Table 1 equipment in the
no
workplace and is it used
according to Table 1?
yes
Previously
yes
uninfluenced behaviour?
(see 5.1.3)
no
Has the employee
no
received specific warnings
from a physician?
yes
Perform a specific assessment
following Annex A.
Document the results Document
Inform Employee about: that no

- Areas for continuous stay AIMD-Employee
- Area of transient exposure
is present
- Areas of non-access
Reminder of guidelines given with the AIMD

End of EN 50527-1
assessment
NOTE 1 National regulations may require occupational physicians to be involved in the assessment process.
NOTE 2 If previously uninfluenced behaviour is assumed, it should be considered that this approach does not provide any safety
margin. Therefore this approach might be suitable only if tolerable interference (i.e. acoustic sound in a cochlear implant) is
expected. If severe interaction might be possible (i.e. delivery of an inappropriate therapy of an implanted defibrillator) this approach
is not recommended.
Figure 2 – Risk assessment process

– 13 – EN 50527-1:2010
5.2 Documentation and information for the AIMD-Employee
The risk assessment shall be documented and the result be communicated to the AIMD-Employee. This
documentation shall follow national regulations. In the absence of national requirements for the
documentation, forms for documenting the risk assessment are suggested in Annex B.
Where applicable, the AIMD-Employee shall be informed about
• areas for continuous stay,
• areas of transient exposure,
• areas of non-access.
It is recommended to remind the AIMD-Employee that guidelines were provided with the AIMD, that they
were provided by a responsible physician, and that they still apply in the workplace.
5.3 Maintaining the risk assessment
The result of the risk assessment procedures must be kept up to date. A procedure shall be installed to
ensure that the employer is informed about any changes of the risk situation.
Such a change of the risk situation occurs
• when the AIMD-Employee receives a new AIMD,
• when the clinical situation of the AIMD-Employee changes,
• where the settings of the AIMD-employee’s AIMD have been changed,
• when the workplace exposure changes significantly.
If a significant event such as inadvertent interference to the AIMD-Employee happens the risk
assessment must be repeated.
6 Equipment at workplaces
This section describes equipment present at the workplace which is identified as not causing interference
with AIMD. No further assessment is needed if only such equipment is present at the workplace. Other
equipment not listed in this section may cause interference with AIMD and a more detailed assessment is
needed, nevertheless the result of the assessment may be that no risk for the AIMD-Employee is
identified.
Table 1 in EN 50499 contains the list of equipment , which is based on the general EMF exposure
conditions for persons without any special consideration for AIMD-Employees. EMF exposure can be
assessed against the basic restrictions from the Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC or to the action
values or limit values given in Directive 2004/40/EC, using time averaging of short duration pulsed fields,
where appropriate. In any of these cases, the instantaneous reference levels from Council
Recommendation 1999/519/EC can be exceeded, the exposure due to the equipment still comply with the
general EMF exposure requirements, and the equipment or situation be included in Table 1 in EN 50499.
This situation is often in a localised area, close to the items of equipment concerned.
The minimum basis for the immunity limits set for AIMDs in their product standards is derived from the
Reference Levels from Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC without any time averaging being
included.
Since the two sets of requirements are not exactly the same, Table 1 as given in EN 50499 has been
amended for this document to take this into account when making risk assessments relating to the
exposure of AIMD-Employees. Table 1 in this document contains these amendments.

Static magnetic fields with flux density of B > 1 mT, at the region occupied by the AIMD, may cause
influenced behavior of the implanted AIMD. This 1 mT limit also applies for “quasi static“ magnetic fields
in the frequency range from 0 Hz to 1 Hz. In addition AIMD product standards also include protection
mechanisms for exposure above the minimum. These mechanisms allow interference levels above the
minimum basis but only under some circumstances and not for all types of AIMD. Transient exposure
under those circumstances may be permitted provided the AIMD-Employee has not received warnings
against this from medical supervisory personnel.
Except in some specific cases the electric and magnetic field levels decrease with increasing distance
from any piece of equipment. This is discussed in detail in D.3 and the decrease amount depends on the
size of the source, the type of field and the distance itself. This allows the identification of interference
distances for some equipment, outside of which an AIMD-Employee can work normally. Similarly if
portable equipment is kept at a minimum distance, equal to the interference distance, from the human
body near the AIMD or attached leads the AIMD-Employee can work normally.
Inside the interference distance the AIMD-Employee should not work unless a specific risk assessment
has been made for that situation. It may be possible for the AIMD-Employee to pass by equipment closer
than the interference distance in conditions of transient exposure. In any case of doubt further guidance
may be obtained from device or emitter manufacturers, medical advisors or by the use of the appropriate
device specific standard.
The additional column in Table 1 provides exceptions and remarks to the general exposure conditions
from EN 50499 which will assist in making risk assessments including AIMD-Employees.
Table 1 – Compliant workplaces and equipment with exceptions
Designation of Examples of equipment Exceptions and remarks
workplace
All places Lighting equipment Excluding microwave & RF lighting.
All places Computer and IT equipment Provided that such equipment does not
contain radio transmission equipment such as
RadioLANs, Bluetooth or Mobile Telephony. If
such items are included in the equipment,
follow recommendations restricting use
received with the AIMD or go to Annex A.
Computer and ITE equipment including
All places Follow recommendations restricting use
wireless communication received with the AIMD or go to Annex A.
All places Office equipment Excluding tape erasers.
All places Mobile phones, and cordless phones Follow recommendations restricting use
received with the AIMD or go to Annex A.
As example for pacemakers and defibrillators
the interference distance between source and
AIMD is 15 cm for peak powers up to 2 W.
All places Two-way radios Follow recommendations restricting use
received with the AIMD or go to Annex A.
All places Base stations for DECT cordless phones and Follow recommendations restricting use
WLAN (e.g. Wi-Fi) received with the AIMD or go to Annex A.
As example for pacemakers and defibrillators
the interference distance between source and
AIMD is 15 cm for peak powers up to 2 W.
All places Non - wireless communication equipment and
networks
– 15 – EN 50527-1:2010
Table 1 – Compliant workplaces and equipment with exceptions (continued)
Designation of Examples of equipment Exceptions and remarks
workplace
All places Electric handheld and transportable tools Areas containing such equipment are
deemed to comply without further
assessment.
However the AIMD-Employee must not
operate the tools unless a further assessment
is performed according to Annex A.
All places Portable heating tools (e.g. glue guns, heat Areas containing such equipment are
guns) deemed to comply without further
assessment.
However the AIMD-Employee must not
operate the tools unless a further assessment
is performed according to Annex A.
All places Battery chargers Small battery chargers for household use.
Large chargers (for professional use) require
further assessment.
Chargers using inductive coupling or
proximity coupling are excluded.
All places Electric operated garden appliances Areas containing such equipment are
deemed to comply without further
assessment.
However the AIMD-Employee must not
operate the tools unless a further assessment
is performed according to Annex A.
All places Audio & video equipment If the equipment uses wireless transmission
follow recommendations restricting use
received with the AIMD or go to Annex A.
All places Portable battery powered equipment not
including radio frequency transmitters.
All places Electrical room heating equipment
All places All non-electrical equipment Some non-electrical equipment may include
high static magnetic fields (for example
permanent magnets). In this case a risk
assessment following Annex A shall be
performed.
All places All equipment producing static magnetic fields Equipment capable of producing static
magnetic flux density of B > 1 mT, at the
region occupied by the AIMD, may cause
influenced behavior of the implanted AIMD.
This 1 mT peak limit also applies for “quasi
static“ magnetic fields in the frequency range
from 0 Hz up to a few Hz.
Table 1 – Compliant workplaces and equipment with exceptions (continued)
Designation of Examples of equipment Exceptions and remarks
workplace
All places Electricity supply networks in the workplace The criteria given in the middle column here
and electricity distribution and transmission for demonstrating that fields are low enough
circuits passing through or over the to avoid interfering with AIMDs are based on
workplace. The magnetic and electric field demonstrating that the exposures are lower
exposure are considered separately. than the reference levels given in the Council
Recommendation 1999/519/EC of EMF
For magnetic field exposures the following
exposures for the general public. It states that
are compliant:
for magnetic fields all overhead lines satisfy
• any electrical installation with a phase this criterion but for electric fields only lines
current rating of 100 A or less;
with a rated voltage up to 150 kV satisfy it.
However for an overhead line whose voltage
• any individual circuit within an
is greater than 150 kV the electric field will
installation, with a phase current rating of
usually, but not always, be lower than the
100 A or less;
public reference level.
• any circuit where the conductors are
C.2 gives more information about this, and as
close together and having a net current
of 100 A or less; a result a risk assessment for a workplace
with an overhead line passing over is not
• all components of the networks satisfying
required if any of the following apply:
the criteria above are covered, (including
the wiring, switchgear, transformers etc.);
• if measurements in the workplace have
shown that the general public electric
• any overhead bare conductors of any
field reference level is not exceed;
voltage.
For electric fields exposures the following are • if computations of the electric field in the
workplace from the overhead line (eg
compliant:
provided by the operator of the line) have
• any underground or insulated cable
shown that general public electric field
circuit, rated at any voltage,
reference level is not exceed;
• any overhead bare circuit rated at a
• if no part of the line where it passes over
voltage up to 100 kV, or overhead line up
the workplace has a clearance to ground
to 150 kV, above the workplace, or at
that is less than 16 m (291 kV to 420 kV
any voltage where the workplace is
indoors. lines), 11 m (226 kV to 290 kV lines), 9 m
(151 kV to 225 kV lines) or any height
(0 kV to 150 kV lines).
• where the workplace is indoors.
This applies where an AIMD employee is at
ground level (standing or sitting etc), and not
where the employee is above the ground.
In the electricity supply industry some work
places may be very close to electricity supply
equipment, in which case the field may
exceed the Council Recommendation general
public reference levels. The risk assessment
for an AIMD employee needs to consider the
levels fields that could be encountered by the
employee and the sensitivity to interference of
the particular AIMD implanted taking account
of its type, its sensitivity settings and whether
the leads are bipolar or unipolar.
Areas where the field exceeds these levels
may involve only “transient exposures” (see
4.6) in which case they may be permitted for
the AIMD.
-------
...