Managing records in cloud computing environments - Part 1: Issues and concerns

This document presents a model for cloud records management and outlines the risks and issues that are considered by records managers before adopting cloud services for records management. The model for cloud records management includes a stakeholder model, processes, metadata, architecture, and use cases. Risks and issues are classified into those originating from cloud services internally and those originating from cloud services externally. Internal risks are associated with cloud services, systems and stakeholders. External risks and issues can occur in the social and legal context in which cloud services operate. The target audience of this document includes: - records, information, knowledge, and governance professionals; - cloud service architects; - archivists using cloud services for managing records; - developers of cloud-deployed records management software; - ICT staff; and - providers of cloud-based records management services.

Gestion des documents d'activité dans les environnements d'informatique en nuage — Partie 1: Enjeux et préoccupations

Upravljanje zapisov v okoljih računalništva v oblaku - 1. del: Vprašanja in pomisleki

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
14-Sep-2020
Current Stage
6060 - International Standard published
Start Date
15-Sep-2020
Completion Date
15-Sep-2020

Relations

Effective Date
06-Jun-2022

Overview

Standard: ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 - Managing records in cloud computing environments - Part 1: Issues and concerns

ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 provides a model and practical guidance for using cloud computing for records management. The report maps stakeholders, processes, metadata and reference architecture, and presents common use cases. It focuses on identifying and classifying risks and issues that records managers and IT professionals need to consider before adopting cloud services for authoritative records.

Key topics

  • Stakeholder model: roles for cloud records customers (producers, records managers, users), service providers (Records Management SaaS, PaaS, IaaS), and partners (agents, auditors).
  • Cloud records management processes: how core records processes are implemented or affected in cloud environments, including operational and governance impacts.
  • Metadata considerations: requirements and practices for metadata needed to maintain authenticity, integrity and evidential value of digital records in the cloud.
  • Reference architecture: high-level architecture patterns for managing authoritative records on cloud platforms.
  • Use cases: practical scenarios such as shared SaaS, customer-developed SaaS, IaaS-based records solutions, multi-IaaS deployments, and the role of records management agents.
  • Risk classification: internal risks (cloud service features, system vulnerabilities, stakeholder behavior) and external risks (legal, jurisdictional and social issues).
  • Social and legal issues: cross-border data jurisdiction, enforceability of contracts, licensing constraints, data ownership and conflicts of terms, long-term preservation and availability concerns.

Practical applications

This technical report is designed to help organizations evaluate and implement cloud records management by:

  • Informing procurement and contract language for cloud-based records services.
  • Guiding records and information managers to assess cloud risks, metadata needs and preservation strategies.
  • Assisting cloud architects and developers to design compliant records management SaaS/PaaS/IaaS solutions.
  • Helping ICT staff and providers understand stakeholder responsibilities and audit/agent roles.
  • Supporting archivists and governance professionals in planning migration, retention and evidential workflows.

Who should use it

  • Records, information and knowledge management professionals
  • Cloud service architects and developers
  • Archivists and digital preservation teams
  • ICT/operations staff and cloud providers
  • Governance, compliance and legal teams concerned with data jurisdiction and contractual controls

Related standards

  • ISO 30300 (management system for records - concepts and vocabulary)
  • ISO 13008 (digital records conversion and migration)
  • ISO/IEC 17788 (cloud computing overview and vocabulary)

Keywords: ISO/TR 22428-1:2020, cloud records management, cloud computing, metadata, records management SaaS, IaaS, PaaS, data jurisdiction, digital preservation, cloud risks.

Technical report

TP ISO/TR 22428-1:2021 - BARVE

English language
30 pages
Preview
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day
Technical report

ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 - Managing records in cloud computing environments — Part 1: Issues and concerns Released:9/15/2020

English language
24 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 is a technical report published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Its full title is "Managing records in cloud computing environments - Part 1: Issues and concerns". This standard covers: This document presents a model for cloud records management and outlines the risks and issues that are considered by records managers before adopting cloud services for records management. The model for cloud records management includes a stakeholder model, processes, metadata, architecture, and use cases. Risks and issues are classified into those originating from cloud services internally and those originating from cloud services externally. Internal risks are associated with cloud services, systems and stakeholders. External risks and issues can occur in the social and legal context in which cloud services operate. The target audience of this document includes: - records, information, knowledge, and governance professionals; - cloud service architects; - archivists using cloud services for managing records; - developers of cloud-deployed records management software; - ICT staff; and - providers of cloud-based records management services.

This document presents a model for cloud records management and outlines the risks and issues that are considered by records managers before adopting cloud services for records management. The model for cloud records management includes a stakeholder model, processes, metadata, architecture, and use cases. Risks and issues are classified into those originating from cloud services internally and those originating from cloud services externally. Internal risks are associated with cloud services, systems and stakeholders. External risks and issues can occur in the social and legal context in which cloud services operate. The target audience of this document includes: - records, information, knowledge, and governance professionals; - cloud service architects; - archivists using cloud services for managing records; - developers of cloud-deployed records management software; - ICT staff; and - providers of cloud-based records management services.

ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 01.140.20 - Information sciences. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ISO 13468-2:2021. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

You can purchase ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 directly from iTeh Standards. The document is available in PDF format and is delivered instantly after payment. Add the standard to your cart and complete the secure checkout process. iTeh Standards is an authorized distributor of ISO standards.

Standards Content (Sample)


SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-marec-2021
Upravljanje zapisov v okoljih računalništva v oblaku - 1. del: Vprašanja in
pomisleki
Managing records in cloud computing environments - Part 1: Issues and concerns
Gestion des documents d'activité dans les environnements d'informatique en nuage
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: ISO/TR 22428-1:2020
ICS:
01.140.20 Informacijske vede Information sciences
35.210 Računalništvo v oblaku Cloud computing
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

TECHNICAL ISO/TR
REPORT 22428-1
First edition
2020-09
Managing records in cloud computing
environments —
Part 1:
Issues and concerns
Gestion des documents d'activité dans les environnements
d'informatique en nuage —
Partie 1: Enjeux et préoccupations
Reference number
©
ISO 2020
© ISO 2020
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting
on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address
below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

Contents Page
Foreword .v
Introduction .vi
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Stakeholder model . 4
4.1 General . 4
4.2 Cloud records management service customer . 5
4.2.1 General. 5
4.2.2 Cloud records producer . 5
4.2.3 Cloud records manager . 6
4.2.4 Cloud records user . 6
4.3 Cloud records management service provider . 6
4.3.1 General. 6
4.3.2 Records management SaaS provider . 6
4.3.3 PaaS provider . 7
4.3.4 IaaS provider . 7
4.4 Cloud records management service partner . 7
4.4.1 Cloud records management agent . 7
4.4.2 Cloud records management auditor . 7
5 Cloud records management environments . 8
5.1 General . 8
5.2 Records management processes in the cloud environment . 8
5.3 Metadata in cloud records management services . 9
5.4 Cloud reference architecture for managing authoritative records .10
6 Use cases in cloud records management .11
6.1 General .11
6.2 SaaS shared by customers .12
6.3 SaaS developed by customers .13
6.4 Records management based on IaaS .13
6.5 Multiple IaaS used by customers .14
6.6 Records management agent .15
7 Risks in cloud records system .16
7.1 General .16
7.2 Cloud service risks .16
7.3 Cloud system risks .18
7.4 Cloud stakeholder risks .19
8 Social and legal issues of cloud services .19
8.1 General .19
8.2 Legal issues .20
8.2.1 General.20
8.2.2 Cross-border data jurisdictional issues .20
8.2.3 Inability to enforce contractual terms .20
8.2.4 Non-negotiable licensing terms .21
8.2.5 Data ownership issues .21
8.2.6 Conflict between the terms and conditions .21
8.3 Social issues .21
8.3.1 General.21
8.3.2 Limitations of technical security .22
8.3.3 Social impact of personal information leakage accidents .22
8.3.4 Unavailability of personal records.23
8.3.5 Risk of long-term preservation of records in the cloud service .23
Bibliography .24
iv © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out by
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject has the right to be represented on
the relevant technical committee if such committee has been established. International organizations,
governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates
closely with the International Electro-technical Commission (IEC) on all matters related to electro-
technical standardization.
The procedures used to develop the present document and those intended for its further maintenance
are described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the various approval criteria needed for
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www .iso .org/ directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be listed in the Introduction
and/or on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www .iso .org/ patents).
Any trade name used in this document is given for the purpose of information for users’ convenience
and does not constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO-specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information on ISO's adherence to the World
Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www .iso .org/ iso/
foreword .html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 46, Information and documentation,
Subcommittee SC 11, Archives/records management.
A list of all parts in the ISO 22428 series can be found on the ISO website.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www .iso .org/ members .html.
Introduction
A cloud service refers to capabilities offered via cloud computing where users can borrow, to use
flexibly, physical or virtual resources which include software and platform, as well as computing
infrastructure, such as data storage and computing servers. The cloud service offers benefits, such as
dynamic scalability, enhanced organizational agility, resilience and cost reduction, enabling improved
organizational competitiveness and efficiency. Cloud services are emerging as an essential aspect of
information technology due to location-independent resource sharing, availability via the Internet and
mobile devices, and the ability to deliver on-demand services and lower costs.
Currently, the explosive growth of digital content through mobile platforms and the Internet of things
is driving organizations to move their computing systems and information assets to the cloud. As a
result, a number of companies and government organizations have shifted their business systems to
cloud services, and many other organizations are planning to adopt cloud services. In the near future, it
is expected that most data will be processed and stored in cloud services.
Cloud services might prove to be an alternative for organizations that are reluctant to invest in
establishing their own computer systems for digital records management. Cloud services can provide
the software, hardware, and platform needed to implement a system for records at an affordable price.
It is often not easy for an organization to implement a system for records that meets all the criteria set
out in ISO 15489-1. If there is a cloud service that satisfies all the criteria set out in ISO 15489-1 and
which is provided at a low price, organizations have good reasons to consider using the cloud service.
However, organizations can be reluctant to adopt cloud services for their records management due
to unknown risks, safety and privacy concerns, and an absence of convincing use cases. While the
advantages of cloud services are well-advertised, awareness of the risks and issues that should be taken
into account in a records management context is often lacking.
Cloud services are based on the concept of borrowing computing resources provided by third
parties. The functions, processes or architectures inside the cloud are not disclosed externally. Even
if a customer agrees with a cloud service provider about their requirements, it is difficult to know
in advance whether their requirements can be met. In particular, it can be very difficult for general-
purpose cloud services to fully satisfy the requirements of the records management process. There are
various types of cloud services according, each of which offers different capabilities. In order to apply a
cloud service to the records management task, the customer could select a cloud service that is suitable
for the characteristics of the records management. The customer also to understands the general
characteristics of cloud services. Otherwise, there is a possibility that desired records management
outcomes will not be able to be delivered after adopting a cloud service.
In addition, in the case of large cloud services, cloud systems can be distributed around the world
transcending national borders. Users from various countries or regional communities can share a cloud
service belonging to a particular country. These characteristics of the cloud can cause various conflicts
and issues because the jurisdictional structure and social environment of the country where the cloud
service provider belongs is different from those of the cloud users. As a result, cloud users can be faced
with unexpected risks associated with immature legal and social agreements for cloud technology.
Therefore, when records managers introduce cloud services to records management, they should
consider the legal and social aspects as well as the technical aspects in advance in order to prepare for
potential risks. Records managers can provide cloud service providers with prerequisites for managing
risks, specified in contracts to reduce the probability of risks coming to fruition. This document aims
to provide guidelines for persons and organizations who are intend to adopt cloud services for records
management.
vi © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

TECHNICAL REPORT ISO/TR 22428-1:2020(E)
Managing records in cloud computing environments —
Part 1:
Issues and concerns
1 Scope
This document presents a model for cloud records management and outlines the risks and issues that
are considered by records managers before adopting cloud services for records management. The
model for cloud records management includes a stakeholder model, processes, metadata, architecture,
and use cases. Risks and issues are classified into those originating from cloud services internally and
those originating from cloud services externally. Internal risks are associated with cloud services,
systems and stakeholders. External risks and issues can occur in the social and legal context in which
cloud services operate.
The target audience of this document includes:
— records, information, knowledge, and governance professionals;
— cloud service architects;
— archivists using cloud services for managing records;
— developers of cloud-deployed records management software;
— ICT staff; and
— providers of cloud-based records management services.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 30300, Information and documentation — Management system for records — Core concepts and
vocabulary
ISO 13008, Information and documentation — Digital records conversion and migration process
ISO/IEC 17788, Information technology — Cloud computing — Overview and vocabulary
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 30300, ISO 13008,
ISO/IEC 17788 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at http:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1
cloud computing
paradigm for enabling network access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable physical or virtual
resources with self-service provisioning and administration on-demand
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.5]
Note 1 to entry: Examples of resources include servers, operating systems, networks, software, applications, and
storage equipment.
3.2
cloud capability type
classification of the functionality provided by a cloud service to the cloud service customer, based on
the nature of resources used
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.4]
3.3
cloud deployment model
ways in which cloud computing (3.1) can be organized based on the control and sharing of physical or
virtual resources
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.7]
3.4
cloud records
digital records created, preserved or managed by a cloud service
3.5
cloud records management
records management entrusted to cloud service
3.6
cloud records management service customer
party that is in a business relationship with the records management service provider for the purpose
of using cloud records management services
3.7
cloud records management service partner
party that is engaged in support of, or as auxiliary to, activities of either the cloud records management
service provider (3.8) or the cloud records management service customer (3.6), or both
3.8
cloud records management service provider
party that makes cloud records management (3.5)services available
3.9
cloud service
one or more capabilities offered via cloud computing (3.1) invoked using a defined interface
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.8]
3.10
cloud service customer
party which is in a business relationship for the purpose of using cloud services (3.9)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.11]
2 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

3.11
cloud SLA
cloud service level agreement
part of the cloud service agreement that includes cloud service level objectives and cloud service
qualitative objectives for the covered cloud service(s)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19086-1:2016, 3.4]
3.12
cloud service provider
party which makes cloud services (3.9) available
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.15]
3.13
IaaS
Infrastructure as a Service
cloud service category in which the cloud capabilities type (3.2) provided to the cloud service customer
is of the infrastructure capabilities type
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.24]
3.14
multi-tenancy
allocation of physical or virtual resources such that multiple tenants (3.21) and their computations and
data are isolated from and inaccessible to one another
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.27]
3.15
PaaS
Platform as a Service
cloud service category in which the cloud capabilities type (3.2) provided to the cloud service customer
is of the platform capabilities type
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.30]
3.16
private cloud
cloud deployment model (3.3) where cloud services (3.9) are used exclusively by a single cloud service
customer (3.10) and resources are controlled by that cloud service customer
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.32]
3.17
public cloud
cloud deployment model (3.3) where cloud services (3.9) are potentially available to any cloud service
customer (3.10) and resources are controlled by the cloud service provider (3.12)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.33]
3.18
SaaS
Software as a Service
cloud service category in which the cloud capabilities type (3.2) provided to the cloud service customer
is of the application capabilities type
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.36]
3.19
SOA
Service Oriented Architecture
architectural style that supports service orientation and is a paradigm for building business solutions
using IT
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 18384-1:2016, 2.48; ISO/IEC TR 30102:2012]
3.20
SORMA
Service Oriented Records Management Architecture
reference architecture model for records management based on cloud services, which includes service
components for supporting records management in the form of SOA (3.19)
3.21
tenant
one or more cloud service users sharing access to a set of physical and virtual resources
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.37]
4 Stakeholder model
4.1 General
The cloud stakeholder model in this document is borrowed from the service model provided by
ISO/IEC 17788, and extends it to the records management domain. A cloud records management service
customer is a party that enters a business relationship with a cloud records management service
provider for the purpose of using cloud records management services. A cloud records management
service provider is a party that makes cloud records management services available. A cloud records
management service partner is a party that is engaged in support of, or as auxiliary to, activities of
either the cloud records management service provider or the cloud records management service
customer, or both.
4 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

Key
party
entity
Figure 1 — Cloud records management stakeholder model
4.2 Cloud records management service customer
4.2.1 General
Cloud records management service customers use cloud services to produce, transmit, maintain, and
dispose of digital records and metadata. Customers strive to negotiate records management policies
and procedures with cloud service providers on prior to entering the service contract. Customers can
have cloud SLA contracts with cloud service providers to ensure confidence in the quality of records
management.
Customers can be divided into several entities (individuals, teams, organizations) based on their
records management role internally as follows:
— cloud records producer;
— cloud records manager;
— cloud records user.
4.2.2 Cloud records producer
Cloud records producers use cloud records management services to produce reliable records. This
means that the cloud records producer ensures the authenticity, integrity, and reliability of the records
by means of a cloud service. Cloud records producers inspect the records they write and verify that the
records are stored in the cloud service without compromising their attributes.
When creating a record, cloud records producers are able to generate metadata that includes business
context and verify that the metadata are generated without distortion. Cloud records producers is
responsible for verifying that metadata are registered and preserved at a cloud service.
4.2.3 Cloud records manager
Cloud records managers have the responsibility of managing the records of their organization using
cloud records management services. The cloud records manager leverages cloud services to perform
administrative tasks such as registration and preservation of records, migration and conversion,
search/query requests, verification of records integrity, and user authentication. The cloud records
manager is expected to be familiar with the data management policies of the cloud service provider
before using the cloud service, and consult with the cloud service provider if necessary.
The cloud records manager is responsible for reviewing the cloud service, ensuring that all requirements
that arise from business and stakeholder expectations and the organization’s regulatory environment
can be met. The cloud records manager is responsible for inspecting the cloud service to see whether
there are any constraints or problems in the functionalities by which records are created, registered,
preserved, retrieved, browsed, and destructed.
When constraints are required for records management in the cloud, cloud records managers can
establish records management policies and procedures for those constraints, and may make specific
demands from cloud service providers as needed. For example, a cloud records manager may require
a private cloud service provider to store records in a separate repository. The cloud records manager
may ask the cloud service provider for access control policy on the records.
The cloud records manager manages access to records by setting the access level of each cloud records
and specifying the access rights of cloud records users. The access rights of cloud records users are
specified depending on their role, seniority, security clearance, location, etc.
The cloud records manager periodically monitors the registration and classification of records, their
preservation status, and security mechanisms. Cloud records managers can maintain records stability
and security quality beyond a certain level through the cloud SLA contract with a cloud service provider.
In addition, the cloud records manager establishes a disaster recovery plan in advance with the cloud
service provider in order to resolve any potential problem related to records within the cloud service.
4.2.4 Cloud records user
A cloud records user is an entity (such as an individual, team, or organization) that searches, accesses,
or browses records through cloud services. Cloud records users are authenticated to cloud service
providers before they use records. Cloud records users' authorization to access to cloud records is
managed by the cloud records manager.
4.3 Cloud records management service provider
4.3.1 General
Cloud service providers are classified as IaaS providers, PaaS providers, and SaaS providers, depending
on the capabilities they provide, and have the roles and responsibilities necessary to perform secure
and reliable digital records management.
4.3.2 Records management SaaS provider
A records management SaaS provider is a party that provides application services for records
management. Records management SaaS includes all functions required for records management. The
records management SaaS provider makes public SaaS service quality that he can afford. Based on the
quality of service, cloud customers contract cloud SLA with the cloud service provider, by which the
provider is legally bound to keep the quality level specified in the cloud SLA.
6 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

The records management SaaS provider is familiar with the data management policies, data processing
capabilities, as well as distributed processing, backup, and recovery mechanism of the IaaS and PaaS.
The records management SaaS provider implements the records management service considering these
factors. The records management SaaS provider clearly states in Terms of Service the limitations of the
records management SaaS they are offering due to the constraints of PaaS or IaaS. Records management
SaaS providers can contract the cloud SLA with PaaS providers or IaaS providers.
4.3.3 PaaS provider
One of the key roles of a PaaS provider is to provide a platform for developing and running records
management SaaS in a secure and reliable manner. SaaS providers can develop SaaS services based on
PaaS service, and a customer could use PaaS to develop directly his own applications. SaaS providers
enter the cloud SLA contract with PaaS service providers to obtain stable and superior platform
services.
4.3.4 IaaS provider
IaaS providers provide hardware such as data storages, servers, and networks in the form of services.
For records management, IaaS providers need to provide reliable storage to keep records even if they
use storage virtualization. Digital records and their metadata are stored stably and securely in IaaS
storage. IaaS providers who are specialized in records management may develop and provide functions
for records management, such as long-term preservation or record registration, to customers.
4.4 Cloud records management service partner
4.4.1 Cloud records management agent
A cloud records management agent is an entity that is contracted by a customer to procure a cloud
service and manage records stored in the cloud service on behalf of the customer. The cloud records
management agent can perform tasks such as selecting the appropriate cloud capability or cloud records
management service, and contract with a cloud service provider. The cloud records management agent
ought to be familiar with the characteristics of digital records management and cloud services. The
cloud records management agent needs the knowledge and experience to perform digital records
management services in the cloud environment. The cloud records management agent acts as follows:
— The cloud records management agent, who has delegated records management authority from
the customer, stores the customer-generated record in the cloud systems, and manages the stored
record on customer’s behalf.
— If a cloud records management agent is delegated legal authority from a customer, the cloud records
management agent acts as a legal representative for legal disputes arising from issues related to
cloud records management.
4.4.2 Cloud records management auditor
A cloud records management auditor may be internal or external to the customer’s organization. Their
role is to audit the organization’s digital records management processes within the cloud records
management service environment with specified standards. The cloud records management auditor
evaluates whether the cloud service is being provided in accordance with the cloud digital record
contract. The cloud records management auditors need especially audit service quality whether they
are afforded as specified in the cloud SLA.
Another role of the cloud records management auditor is to conduct an examination and evaluation
when the cloud records management service is closed. At the time, the auditor needs to be able to
confirm that all records and metadata have been migrated out of a system and that the source records
or "trace" of the record has gone from the service providers system. In addition, the following items are
audited regarding cloud services:
— procedures for digital records creation and management;
— procedures for sending and receiving digital records;
— security, availability, stability, performance;
— different types of cloud records management services and billing systems;
— long-term preservation plan;
— backup plan;
— migration plan;
— disaster measures;
— whether access control policies are being used appropriately;
— whether disposal is being undertaken as required;
— whether records are able to be located, retrieved, presented and interpreted;
— whether records are portable and can be managed during transition from one service arrangement
to another.
5 Cloud records management environments
5.1 General
Cloud services may have both positive and negative effects on records management due to the intrinsic
nature of cloud services. Negative effects (associated with risks and discussed in Clause 7) are mostly
caused by the transfer of all or part of the records management control to the cloud service provider.
In order to apply cloud services to records management, positive effects of cloud services should
be maximized, and the negative effects of cloud services should be minimized. This clause presents
considerations for processes, metadata and architecture for cloud-based records management services
to minimize the potential negative impacts from adopting cloud services for records management.
5.2 Records management processes in the cloud environment
The cloud service provider provides services supporting to all or part processes for records, from
records creation to disposition of records. Customers leverage cloud services to manage records
directly, or may entrust whole records management to cloud service providers. Customers and cloud
service providers may consider the following in the cloud-based records management process.
— Creating/Capturing records: Customers need to use SaaS to create or capture their own records and
preserve them in cloud storages. Records created or captured in SaaS are transferred to the cloud
server via the open network, which exposes them to the risk of record integrity or authenticity.
Therefore, the data transport protocol is confidential and reliable, and ensures the integrity of the
record. Customers also use SaaS to store records in cloud services, which reliably stores the records
and metadata for the records in the cloud storage. The link data between a record and its metadata
are stored safely and not lost in the cloud storage. Multiple customers share SaaS through a multi-
tenancy mechanism. Therefore, SaaS service providers clearly present access control methods
and ownership of records and metadata created by each customer. SaaS service providers need to
understand the computing resource management policies of PaaS service providers or IaaS service
providers and inform customers of SaaS quality level. Role and responsibility associated with
record generation, access control and ownership, and the service quality level may be specified in
an agreement between a customer and a SaaS service provider.
8 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

— Classification and indexing: When a customer requests a classification for records to a cloud service
provider, the cloud service provider provides this classification service. If the customer provides
records and contextual data, the cloud service provider index the records in the classification with
the contextual data. Records once indexed might need to be reclassified at the customer's request,
in which case the cloud service provider reclassifies the records with modifying metadata.
— Access control: The cloud service providers need to establish principles for the authority to access,
conditions and restrictions regarding the stored records, and provide the customer with search
tools for metadata and classification category. Customers can browse only their own records
or records that they are allowed to access. Technical measures to prevent illegal copying, leaks,
falsification, etc., are taken when allowing browsing by a customer.
— Storing records: In cloud services, records are stored in the form of several copies for easy
availability, where management and tracking of each copy is essential. This can cause conflict if
they differ from the customer's requirements. Cloud service providers and customers agree on the
applicable data management policies. The cloud service has in place a process and storage for the
stable preservation of the records and prevent loss of the records due to disaster, system failure, etc.
In addition, when a customer requests long-term retention of a record, the cloud service provider
has the long-term management policy and long-term stable storages.
— Use and reuse: As long as records are kept in a cloud service, they are useable. Cloud service providers
can manage records metadata and metadata for cloud systems to maintain records usability. The
records are convertible to alternative formats available at customers desire. In addition, cloud
service providers need a plan to ensure continued access and usability of records in the event of a
disaster.
— Migration: At the request of a customer, records can be migrated from a cloud service to another
or from a cloud service to a customer's server. For the migration of cloud records, an agreement on
migration schedules, storage file types, data transfer protocols, security, transfer file types, and
integrity verification methods are preceded. After the migration, there is a process for ensuring the
integrity of the records and metadata contents and structure. If an error is detected in the process,
the cloud service provider informs the customer of the error and clears the error. The records
migrated are completely disposed in cloud servers, and the cloud service provider needs to notify
the customer of the results of the disposition.
— Disposition: Records stored in a cloud service are disposed of either at the request of the customer
or when the retention period specified in the contract expires. Cloud service providers may ask
the customer to extend the retention period before the records are automatically disposed at the
end of the retention period. The cloud service provider controls disposition processes and destroys
records and associated metadata. The cloud service provider has the capabilities to dispose of all
distributed copies of records.
— Audit trail: Activities performed by cloud service customers or cloud service providers are recorded
in audit trails. Audit trails are protected against unauthorized loss or alteration. They are available
upon request for agents who are authorized to do so.
5.3 Metadata in cloud records management services
To ensure the authenticity of records stored in the cloud, the records' metadata need to be reliably
managed. In the cloud records management environment, metadata can be classified as: 1) records
metadata and 2) system metadata generated by cloud services. The records metadata could be generated
by a customer, either through a SaaS application or a customer-owned software. The customer remains
responsible for the integrity of the records metadata. The system metadata are needed to manage
records and operate in cloud systems.
Most of system metadata are automatically generated in the cloud system, but the cloud service provider
may generate them partly by referring to the records metadata. Such metadata can be used as an audit
trail for records management or as evidence to verify the integrity and authenticity of records. The
following are the metadata items that could be used for records management by cloud capability type:
— Metadata for SaaS: Tenant ID, User ID, Terms of use, role, and responsibility of the cloud records
management service provider, etc.
— Metadata for PaaS: Name and version of execution platform, name and version of the service
development platform, API version, name of the application used for continuous integration and
continuous development, etc.
— Metadata for IaaS: OS name and version, storage type, container type; Network type, number of
record copies; file system name, type and version of hypervisor, etc.
The records metadata are available at any time at the customer's request. However, system metadata
may be proprietary to the cloud service provider and may not have to be provided to customers. This
could be an issue in situations where there is no prior agreement on ownership of the system between
the customer and the cloud service provider. The cloud service provider makes this clear at the time of
contracting the obligations to provide metadata and its ownership, depending on the type of metadata.
Figure 1 shows the relationship between records metadata and system metadata generated in cloud
services.
Figure 2 — Records metadata on cloud services
5.4 Cloud reference architecture for managing authoritative records
Cloud services are classified into IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS depending on the capabilities of the computing
resources they provide. IaaS are services that provide flexible computing infrastructures to a number of
customers by virtualized ph
...


TECHNICAL ISO/TR
REPORT 22428-1
First edition
2020-09
Managing records in cloud computing
environments —
Part 1:
Issues and concerns
Gestion des documents d'activité dans les environnements
d'informatique en nuage —
Partie 1: Enjeux et préoccupations
Reference number
©
ISO 2020
© ISO 2020
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting
on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address
below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

Contents Page
Foreword .v
Introduction .vi
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Stakeholder model . 4
4.1 General . 4
4.2 Cloud records management service customer . 5
4.2.1 General. 5
4.2.2 Cloud records producer . 5
4.2.3 Cloud records manager . 6
4.2.4 Cloud records user . 6
4.3 Cloud records management service provider . 6
4.3.1 General. 6
4.3.2 Records management SaaS provider . 6
4.3.3 PaaS provider . 7
4.3.4 IaaS provider . 7
4.4 Cloud records management service partner . 7
4.4.1 Cloud records management agent . 7
4.4.2 Cloud records management auditor . 7
5 Cloud records management environments . 8
5.1 General . 8
5.2 Records management processes in the cloud environment . 8
5.3 Metadata in cloud records management services . 9
5.4 Cloud reference architecture for managing authoritative records .10
6 Use cases in cloud records management .11
6.1 General .11
6.2 SaaS shared by customers .12
6.3 SaaS developed by customers .13
6.4 Records management based on IaaS .13
6.5 Multiple IaaS used by customers .14
6.6 Records management agent .15
7 Risks in cloud records system .16
7.1 General .16
7.2 Cloud service risks .16
7.3 Cloud system risks .18
7.4 Cloud stakeholder risks .19
8 Social and legal issues of cloud services .19
8.1 General .19
8.2 Legal issues .20
8.2.1 General.20
8.2.2 Cross-border data jurisdictional issues .20
8.2.3 Inability to enforce contractual terms .20
8.2.4 Non-negotiable licensing terms .21
8.2.5 Data ownership issues .21
8.2.6 Conflict between the terms and conditions .21
8.3 Social issues .21
8.3.1 General.21
8.3.2 Limitations of technical security .22
8.3.3 Social impact of personal information leakage accidents .22
8.3.4 Unavailability of personal records.23
8.3.5 Risk of long-term preservation of records in the cloud service .23
Bibliography .24
iv © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out by
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject has the right to be represented on
the relevant technical committee if such committee has been established. International organizations,
governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates
closely with the International Electro-technical Commission (IEC) on all matters related to electro-
technical standardization.
The procedures used to develop the present document and those intended for its further maintenance
are described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the various approval criteria needed for
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www .iso .org/ directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be listed in the Introduction
and/or on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www .iso .org/ patents).
Any trade name used in this document is given for the purpose of information for users’ convenience
and does not constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO-specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information on ISO's adherence to the World
Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www .iso .org/ iso/
foreword .html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 46, Information and documentation,
Subcommittee SC 11, Archives/records management.
A list of all parts in the ISO 22428 series can be found on the ISO website.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www .iso .org/ members .html.
Introduction
A cloud service refers to capabilities offered via cloud computing where users can borrow, to use
flexibly, physical or virtual resources which include software and platform, as well as computing
infrastructure, such as data storage and computing servers. The cloud service offers benefits, such as
dynamic scalability, enhanced organizational agility, resilience and cost reduction, enabling improved
organizational competitiveness and efficiency. Cloud services are emerging as an essential aspect of
information technology due to location-independent resource sharing, availability via the Internet and
mobile devices, and the ability to deliver on-demand services and lower costs.
Currently, the explosive growth of digital content through mobile platforms and the Internet of things
is driving organizations to move their computing systems and information assets to the cloud. As a
result, a number of companies and government organizations have shifted their business systems to
cloud services, and many other organizations are planning to adopt cloud services. In the near future, it
is expected that most data will be processed and stored in cloud services.
Cloud services might prove to be an alternative for organizations that are reluctant to invest in
establishing their own computer systems for digital records management. Cloud services can provide
the software, hardware, and platform needed to implement a system for records at an affordable price.
It is often not easy for an organization to implement a system for records that meets all the criteria set
out in ISO 15489-1. If there is a cloud service that satisfies all the criteria set out in ISO 15489-1 and
which is provided at a low price, organizations have good reasons to consider using the cloud service.
However, organizations can be reluctant to adopt cloud services for their records management due
to unknown risks, safety and privacy concerns, and an absence of convincing use cases. While the
advantages of cloud services are well-advertised, awareness of the risks and issues that should be taken
into account in a records management context is often lacking.
Cloud services are based on the concept of borrowing computing resources provided by third
parties. The functions, processes or architectures inside the cloud are not disclosed externally. Even
if a customer agrees with a cloud service provider about their requirements, it is difficult to know
in advance whether their requirements can be met. In particular, it can be very difficult for general-
purpose cloud services to fully satisfy the requirements of the records management process. There are
various types of cloud services according, each of which offers different capabilities. In order to apply a
cloud service to the records management task, the customer could select a cloud service that is suitable
for the characteristics of the records management. The customer also to understands the general
characteristics of cloud services. Otherwise, there is a possibility that desired records management
outcomes will not be able to be delivered after adopting a cloud service.
In addition, in the case of large cloud services, cloud systems can be distributed around the world
transcending national borders. Users from various countries or regional communities can share a cloud
service belonging to a particular country. These characteristics of the cloud can cause various conflicts
and issues because the jurisdictional structure and social environment of the country where the cloud
service provider belongs is different from those of the cloud users. As a result, cloud users can be faced
with unexpected risks associated with immature legal and social agreements for cloud technology.
Therefore, when records managers introduce cloud services to records management, they should
consider the legal and social aspects as well as the technical aspects in advance in order to prepare for
potential risks. Records managers can provide cloud service providers with prerequisites for managing
risks, specified in contracts to reduce the probability of risks coming to fruition. This document aims
to provide guidelines for persons and organizations who are intend to adopt cloud services for records
management.
vi © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

TECHNICAL REPORT ISO/TR 22428-1:2020(E)
Managing records in cloud computing environments —
Part 1:
Issues and concerns
1 Scope
This document presents a model for cloud records management and outlines the risks and issues that
are considered by records managers before adopting cloud services for records management. The
model for cloud records management includes a stakeholder model, processes, metadata, architecture,
and use cases. Risks and issues are classified into those originating from cloud services internally and
those originating from cloud services externally. Internal risks are associated with cloud services,
systems and stakeholders. External risks and issues can occur in the social and legal context in which
cloud services operate.
The target audience of this document includes:
— records, information, knowledge, and governance professionals;
— cloud service architects;
— archivists using cloud services for managing records;
— developers of cloud-deployed records management software;
— ICT staff; and
— providers of cloud-based records management services.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 30300, Information and documentation — Management system for records — Core concepts and
vocabulary
ISO 13008, Information and documentation — Digital records conversion and migration process
ISO/IEC 17788, Information technology — Cloud computing — Overview and vocabulary
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 30300, ISO 13008,
ISO/IEC 17788 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at http:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1
cloud computing
paradigm for enabling network access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable physical or virtual
resources with self-service provisioning and administration on-demand
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.5]
Note 1 to entry: Examples of resources include servers, operating systems, networks, software, applications, and
storage equipment.
3.2
cloud capability type
classification of the functionality provided by a cloud service to the cloud service customer, based on
the nature of resources used
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.4]
3.3
cloud deployment model
ways in which cloud computing (3.1) can be organized based on the control and sharing of physical or
virtual resources
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.7]
3.4
cloud records
digital records created, preserved or managed by a cloud service
3.5
cloud records management
records management entrusted to cloud service
3.6
cloud records management service customer
party that is in a business relationship with the records management service provider for the purpose
of using cloud records management services
3.7
cloud records management service partner
party that is engaged in support of, or as auxiliary to, activities of either the cloud records management
service provider (3.8) or the cloud records management service customer (3.6), or both
3.8
cloud records management service provider
party that makes cloud records management (3.5)services available
3.9
cloud service
one or more capabilities offered via cloud computing (3.1) invoked using a defined interface
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.8]
3.10
cloud service customer
party which is in a business relationship for the purpose of using cloud services (3.9)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.11]
2 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

3.11
cloud SLA
cloud service level agreement
part of the cloud service agreement that includes cloud service level objectives and cloud service
qualitative objectives for the covered cloud service(s)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19086-1:2016, 3.4]
3.12
cloud service provider
party which makes cloud services (3.9) available
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.15]
3.13
IaaS
Infrastructure as a Service
cloud service category in which the cloud capabilities type (3.2) provided to the cloud service customer
is of the infrastructure capabilities type
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.24]
3.14
multi-tenancy
allocation of physical or virtual resources such that multiple tenants (3.21) and their computations and
data are isolated from and inaccessible to one another
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.27]
3.15
PaaS
Platform as a Service
cloud service category in which the cloud capabilities type (3.2) provided to the cloud service customer
is of the platform capabilities type
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.30]
3.16
private cloud
cloud deployment model (3.3) where cloud services (3.9) are used exclusively by a single cloud service
customer (3.10) and resources are controlled by that cloud service customer
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.32]
3.17
public cloud
cloud deployment model (3.3) where cloud services (3.9) are potentially available to any cloud service
customer (3.10) and resources are controlled by the cloud service provider (3.12)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.33]
3.18
SaaS
Software as a Service
cloud service category in which the cloud capabilities type (3.2) provided to the cloud service customer
is of the application capabilities type
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.36]
3.19
SOA
Service Oriented Architecture
architectural style that supports service orientation and is a paradigm for building business solutions
using IT
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 18384-1:2016, 2.48; ISO/IEC TR 30102:2012]
3.20
SORMA
Service Oriented Records Management Architecture
reference architecture model for records management based on cloud services, which includes service
components for supporting records management in the form of SOA (3.19)
3.21
tenant
one or more cloud service users sharing access to a set of physical and virtual resources
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 17788:2014, 3.2.37]
4 Stakeholder model
4.1 General
The cloud stakeholder model in this document is borrowed from the service model provided by
ISO/IEC 17788, and extends it to the records management domain. A cloud records management service
customer is a party that enters a business relationship with a cloud records management service
provider for the purpose of using cloud records management services. A cloud records management
service provider is a party that makes cloud records management services available. A cloud records
management service partner is a party that is engaged in support of, or as auxiliary to, activities of
either the cloud records management service provider or the cloud records management service
customer, or both.
4 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

Key
party
entity
Figure 1 — Cloud records management stakeholder model
4.2 Cloud records management service customer
4.2.1 General
Cloud records management service customers use cloud services to produce, transmit, maintain, and
dispose of digital records and metadata. Customers strive to negotiate records management policies
and procedures with cloud service providers on prior to entering the service contract. Customers can
have cloud SLA contracts with cloud service providers to ensure confidence in the quality of records
management.
Customers can be divided into several entities (individuals, teams, organizations) based on their
records management role internally as follows:
— cloud records producer;
— cloud records manager;
— cloud records user.
4.2.2 Cloud records producer
Cloud records producers use cloud records management services to produce reliable records. This
means that the cloud records producer ensures the authenticity, integrity, and reliability of the records
by means of a cloud service. Cloud records producers inspect the records they write and verify that the
records are stored in the cloud service without compromising their attributes.
When creating a record, cloud records producers are able to generate metadata that includes business
context and verify that the metadata are generated without distortion. Cloud records producers is
responsible for verifying that metadata are registered and preserved at a cloud service.
4.2.3 Cloud records manager
Cloud records managers have the responsibility of managing the records of their organization using
cloud records management services. The cloud records manager leverages cloud services to perform
administrative tasks such as registration and preservation of records, migration and conversion,
search/query requests, verification of records integrity, and user authentication. The cloud records
manager is expected to be familiar with the data management policies of the cloud service provider
before using the cloud service, and consult with the cloud service provider if necessary.
The cloud records manager is responsible for reviewing the cloud service, ensuring that all requirements
that arise from business and stakeholder expectations and the organization’s regulatory environment
can be met. The cloud records manager is responsible for inspecting the cloud service to see whether
there are any constraints or problems in the functionalities by which records are created, registered,
preserved, retrieved, browsed, and destructed.
When constraints are required for records management in the cloud, cloud records managers can
establish records management policies and procedures for those constraints, and may make specific
demands from cloud service providers as needed. For example, a cloud records manager may require
a private cloud service provider to store records in a separate repository. The cloud records manager
may ask the cloud service provider for access control policy on the records.
The cloud records manager manages access to records by setting the access level of each cloud records
and specifying the access rights of cloud records users. The access rights of cloud records users are
specified depending on their role, seniority, security clearance, location, etc.
The cloud records manager periodically monitors the registration and classification of records, their
preservation status, and security mechanisms. Cloud records managers can maintain records stability
and security quality beyond a certain level through the cloud SLA contract with a cloud service provider.
In addition, the cloud records manager establishes a disaster recovery plan in advance with the cloud
service provider in order to resolve any potential problem related to records within the cloud service.
4.2.4 Cloud records user
A cloud records user is an entity (such as an individual, team, or organization) that searches, accesses,
or browses records through cloud services. Cloud records users are authenticated to cloud service
providers before they use records. Cloud records users' authorization to access to cloud records is
managed by the cloud records manager.
4.3 Cloud records management service provider
4.3.1 General
Cloud service providers are classified as IaaS providers, PaaS providers, and SaaS providers, depending
on the capabilities they provide, and have the roles and responsibilities necessary to perform secure
and reliable digital records management.
4.3.2 Records management SaaS provider
A records management SaaS provider is a party that provides application services for records
management. Records management SaaS includes all functions required for records management. The
records management SaaS provider makes public SaaS service quality that he can afford. Based on the
quality of service, cloud customers contract cloud SLA with the cloud service provider, by which the
provider is legally bound to keep the quality level specified in the cloud SLA.
6 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

The records management SaaS provider is familiar with the data management policies, data processing
capabilities, as well as distributed processing, backup, and recovery mechanism of the IaaS and PaaS.
The records management SaaS provider implements the records management service considering these
factors. The records management SaaS provider clearly states in Terms of Service the limitations of the
records management SaaS they are offering due to the constraints of PaaS or IaaS. Records management
SaaS providers can contract the cloud SLA with PaaS providers or IaaS providers.
4.3.3 PaaS provider
One of the key roles of a PaaS provider is to provide a platform for developing and running records
management SaaS in a secure and reliable manner. SaaS providers can develop SaaS services based on
PaaS service, and a customer could use PaaS to develop directly his own applications. SaaS providers
enter the cloud SLA contract with PaaS service providers to obtain stable and superior platform
services.
4.3.4 IaaS provider
IaaS providers provide hardware such as data storages, servers, and networks in the form of services.
For records management, IaaS providers need to provide reliable storage to keep records even if they
use storage virtualization. Digital records and their metadata are stored stably and securely in IaaS
storage. IaaS providers who are specialized in records management may develop and provide functions
for records management, such as long-term preservation or record registration, to customers.
4.4 Cloud records management service partner
4.4.1 Cloud records management agent
A cloud records management agent is an entity that is contracted by a customer to procure a cloud
service and manage records stored in the cloud service on behalf of the customer. The cloud records
management agent can perform tasks such as selecting the appropriate cloud capability or cloud records
management service, and contract with a cloud service provider. The cloud records management agent
ought to be familiar with the characteristics of digital records management and cloud services. The
cloud records management agent needs the knowledge and experience to perform digital records
management services in the cloud environment. The cloud records management agent acts as follows:
— The cloud records management agent, who has delegated records management authority from
the customer, stores the customer-generated record in the cloud systems, and manages the stored
record on customer’s behalf.
— If a cloud records management agent is delegated legal authority from a customer, the cloud records
management agent acts as a legal representative for legal disputes arising from issues related to
cloud records management.
4.4.2 Cloud records management auditor
A cloud records management auditor may be internal or external to the customer’s organization. Their
role is to audit the organization’s digital records management processes within the cloud records
management service environment with specified standards. The cloud records management auditor
evaluates whether the cloud service is being provided in accordance with the cloud digital record
contract. The cloud records management auditors need especially audit service quality whether they
are afforded as specified in the cloud SLA.
Another role of the cloud records management auditor is to conduct an examination and evaluation
when the cloud records management service is closed. At the time, the auditor needs to be able to
confirm that all records and metadata have been migrated out of a system and that the source records
or "trace" of the record has gone from the service providers system. In addition, the following items are
audited regarding cloud services:
— procedures for digital records creation and management;
— procedures for sending and receiving digital records;
— security, availability, stability, performance;
— different types of cloud records management services and billing systems;
— long-term preservation plan;
— backup plan;
— migration plan;
— disaster measures;
— whether access control policies are being used appropriately;
— whether disposal is being undertaken as required;
— whether records are able to be located, retrieved, presented and interpreted;
— whether records are portable and can be managed during transition from one service arrangement
to another.
5 Cloud records management environments
5.1 General
Cloud services may have both positive and negative effects on records management due to the intrinsic
nature of cloud services. Negative effects (associated with risks and discussed in Clause 7) are mostly
caused by the transfer of all or part of the records management control to the cloud service provider.
In order to apply cloud services to records management, positive effects of cloud services should
be maximized, and the negative effects of cloud services should be minimized. This clause presents
considerations for processes, metadata and architecture for cloud-based records management services
to minimize the potential negative impacts from adopting cloud services for records management.
5.2 Records management processes in the cloud environment
The cloud service provider provides services supporting to all or part processes for records, from
records creation to disposition of records. Customers leverage cloud services to manage records
directly, or may entrust whole records management to cloud service providers. Customers and cloud
service providers may consider the following in the cloud-based records management process.
— Creating/Capturing records: Customers need to use SaaS to create or capture their own records and
preserve them in cloud storages. Records created or captured in SaaS are transferred to the cloud
server via the open network, which exposes them to the risk of record integrity or authenticity.
Therefore, the data transport protocol is confidential and reliable, and ensures the integrity of the
record. Customers also use SaaS to store records in cloud services, which reliably stores the records
and metadata for the records in the cloud storage. The link data between a record and its metadata
are stored safely and not lost in the cloud storage. Multiple customers share SaaS through a multi-
tenancy mechanism. Therefore, SaaS service providers clearly present access control methods
and ownership of records and metadata created by each customer. SaaS service providers need to
understand the computing resource management policies of PaaS service providers or IaaS service
providers and inform customers of SaaS quality level. Role and responsibility associated with
record generation, access control and ownership, and the service quality level may be specified in
an agreement between a customer and a SaaS service provider.
8 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

— Classification and indexing: When a customer requests a classification for records to a cloud service
provider, the cloud service provider provides this classification service. If the customer provides
records and contextual data, the cloud service provider index the records in the classification with
the contextual data. Records once indexed might need to be reclassified at the customer's request,
in which case the cloud service provider reclassifies the records with modifying metadata.
— Access control: The cloud service providers need to establish principles for the authority to access,
conditions and restrictions regarding the stored records, and provide the customer with search
tools for metadata and classification category. Customers can browse only their own records
or records that they are allowed to access. Technical measures to prevent illegal copying, leaks,
falsification, etc., are taken when allowing browsing by a customer.
— Storing records: In cloud services, records are stored in the form of several copies for easy
availability, where management and tracking of each copy is essential. This can cause conflict if
they differ from the customer's requirements. Cloud service providers and customers agree on the
applicable data management policies. The cloud service has in place a process and storage for the
stable preservation of the records and prevent loss of the records due to disaster, system failure, etc.
In addition, when a customer requests long-term retention of a record, the cloud service provider
has the long-term management policy and long-term stable storages.
— Use and reuse: As long as records are kept in a cloud service, they are useable. Cloud service providers
can manage records metadata and metadata for cloud systems to maintain records usability. The
records are convertible to alternative formats available at customers desire. In addition, cloud
service providers need a plan to ensure continued access and usability of records in the event of a
disaster.
— Migration: At the request of a customer, records can be migrated from a cloud service to another
or from a cloud service to a customer's server. For the migration of cloud records, an agreement on
migration schedules, storage file types, data transfer protocols, security, transfer file types, and
integrity verification methods are preceded. After the migration, there is a process for ensuring the
integrity of the records and metadata contents and structure. If an error is detected in the process,
the cloud service provider informs the customer of the error and clears the error. The records
migrated are completely disposed in cloud servers, and the cloud service provider needs to notify
the customer of the results of the disposition.
— Disposition: Records stored in a cloud service are disposed of either at the request of the customer
or when the retention period specified in the contract expires. Cloud service providers may ask
the customer to extend the retention period before the records are automatically disposed at the
end of the retention period. The cloud service provider controls disposition processes and destroys
records and associated metadata. The cloud service provider has the capabilities to dispose of all
distributed copies of records.
— Audit trail: Activities performed by cloud service customers or cloud service providers are recorded
in audit trails. Audit trails are protected against unauthorized loss or alteration. They are available
upon request for agents who are authorized to do so.
5.3 Metadata in cloud records management services
To ensure the authenticity of records stored in the cloud, the records' metadata need to be reliably
managed. In the cloud records management environment, metadata can be classified as: 1) records
metadata and 2) system metadata generated by cloud services. The records metadata could be generated
by a customer, either through a SaaS application or a customer-owned software. The customer remains
responsible for the integrity of the records metadata. The system metadata are needed to manage
records and operate in cloud systems.
Most of system metadata are automatically generated in the cloud system, but the cloud service provider
may generate them partly by referring to the records metadata. Such metadata can be used as an audit
trail for records management or as evidence to verify the integrity and authenticity of records. The
following are the metadata items that could be used for records management by cloud capability type:
— Metadata for SaaS: Tenant ID, User ID, Terms of use, role, and responsibility of the cloud records
management service provider, etc.
— Metadata for PaaS: Name and version of execution platform, name and version of the service
development platform, API version, name of the application used for continuous integration and
continuous development, etc.
— Metadata for IaaS: OS name and version, storage type, container type; Network type, number of
record copies; file system name, type and version of hypervisor, etc.
The records metadata are available at any time at the customer's request. However, system metadata
may be proprietary to the cloud service provider and may not have to be provided to customers. This
could be an issue in situations where there is no prior agreement on ownership of the system between
the customer and the cloud service provider. The cloud service provider makes this clear at the time of
contracting the obligations to provide metadata and its ownership, depending on the type of metadata.
Figure 1 shows the relationship between records metadata and system metadata generated in cloud
services.
Figure 2 — Records metadata on cloud services
5.4 Cloud reference architecture for managing authoritative records
Cloud services are classified into IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS depending on the capabilities of the computing
resources they provide. IaaS are services that provide flexible computing infrastructures to a number of
customers by virtualized physical server (CPU, Memory, Operating System [OS], storage, and network).
PaaS provide on demand the underlying functions and capabilities needed for the development and
deployment of SaaS. PaaS are likely to be generic, and not specific to the records management function.
SaaS are applications in the form of service.
The IaaS is sustainable enough and prepare for any form of incident for the reliable and secure storage
of records. The IaaS for records management also provides functions related to preservation and
disposition of stored records as well as backup and recovery services. The SaaS for records management
has the functions necessary to acquire, preserve, search, and browse records.
Cloud computing essentially has a service-oriented architecture, which means that cloud records
management services are delivered on a modular basis of self-contained business activities with
specified outcomes, and whose detailed workings are opaque to the cloud service customer. It would
be helpful to have a reference standard for cloud records management services that organization scan
refer to when performing records management through cloud services. This document provides a
clou
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...

ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 표준은 클라우드 컴퓨팅 환경에서의 기록 관리에 대한 포괄적인 가이드를 제공하는 문서로서, 클라우드 서비스 도입 시 고려해야 할 위험과 문제를 명확히 제시하고 있습니다. 이 표준은 기록 관리의 모범 사례를 체계적으로 설명하며, 이해관계자 모델, 프로세스, 메타데이터, 아키텍처 및 사용 사례를 포함한 클라우드 기록 관리 모델을 정의합니다. 강점으로는 첫째, 클라우드 기록 관리에 대한 구체적인 프레임워크를 제공하여 기록 관리자들이 클라우드 서비스를 도입할 때 발생할 수 있는 내부 및 외부 위험을 상세히 분류할 수 있는 점입니다. 내부 위험은 클라우드 서비스 자체와 관련된 시스템 및 이해관계자로부터 발생하며, 외부 위험은 클라우드 서비스가 운영되는 사회적 및 법적 맥락에서 기인합니다. 이러한 분류는 클라우드 기록 관리의 리스크를 효과적으로 관리할 수 있는 기반을 마련합니다. 둘째, ISO/TR 22428-1:2020은 다양한 이해관계자들, 즉 기록, 정보, 지식 및 거버넌스 전문가, 클라우드 서비스 아키텍트, 클라우드를 사용하는 아카이브 관리자, 클라우드 배포 기록 관리 소프트웨어 개발자, ICT 직원 등에게 향합니다. 이처럼 폭넓은 대상은 클라우드 기록 관리의 중요성을 강조하며, 각 전문 분야의 요구에 부합하는 지침을 제공합니다. 셋째, 클라우드 기반 기록 관리 서비스 제공자에게 이 문서는 클라우드 환경에서의 기록 관리의 복잡성과 그에 따른 법적, 사회적 고려사항에 대한 통찰을 제공합니다. 이는 클라우드 기록 관리의 실무자들이 보다 효과적으로 클라우드 서비스를 활용하고, 그에 따른 문제를 사전에 방지할 수 있도록 돕습니다. 결론적으로, ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 표준은 클라우드 컴퓨팅 환경에서의 기록 관리에 필요한 이론적 및 실무적 도구를 제공하여 기록 관리자들이 더욱 안전하고 효율적으로 클라우드 서비스를 활용할 수 있도록 지원합니다.

The ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 document, titled "Managing records in cloud computing environments - Part 1: Issues and concerns," serves as a crucial standard for guiding records managers in the realm of cloud services. Its comprehensive scope outlines a robust model for cloud records management, identifying essential stakeholder interactions, processes, metadata requirements, architectural considerations, and applicable use cases. One of the significant strengths of this standard is its detailed classification of risks and issues related to cloud services. By separating internal risks, which arise from cloud systems and their stakeholders, from external risks that stem from broader social and legal contexts, the document offers a clear framework for records managers to assess potential impacts on compliance, security, and data integrity. The relevance of ISO/TR 22428-1 is evident as it addresses the specific concerns faced by various professionals involved in records management within cloud environments. Its target audience, which includes records, information, knowledge, and governance professionals as well as cloud service architects and developers of cloud-deployed records management software, underscores its utility across multiple sectors relying on digital information management. Furthermore, the standard’s focus on a stakeholder model and processes provides actionable insights for organizations looking to transition to or enhance their cloud-based records management practices. By integrating considerations for metadata and architecture, ISO/TR 22428-1 aids in ensuring that records management practices are not only compliant but also effective in leveraging the advantages of cloud computing. In summary, ISO/TR 22428-1 exemplifies a forward-thinking approach to managing records in cloud computing environments, making it an indispensable resource for records managers and related professionals navigating the complexities of modern data management.

La norme ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 représente une avancée significative dans la gestion des enregistrements dans les environnements de cloud computing, en fournissant un modèle clair et des lignes directrices essentielles pour les professionnels spécialisés dans ce domaine. Cette norme couvre un large éventail d'aspects liés à la gestion des enregistrements dans le nuage, mettant en évidence les risques et préoccupations que doivent considérer les gestionnaires d'enregistrements avant d'adopter des services de cloud pour cette gestion. Une des forces majeures de ce document réside dans son modèle de gestion des enregistrements cloud, qui s'articule autour d'un modèle des parties prenantes, de processus bien définis, de métadonnées, d'une architecture adéquate et de cas d'utilisation pertinents. Ce cadre permet aux professionnels de la gestion des enregistrements de naviguer efficacement dans les complexités du cloud computing, tout en garantissant la conformité et la sécurité des données. La classification des risques et des problèmes est également une pierre angulaire de cette norme. En distinguant les risques internes provenant des services cloud et ceux externes qui peuvent surgir dans le contexte social et légal, la norme permet une évaluation exhaustive des menaces potentielles. Cela est crucial pour les professionnels en gestion de l’information et en gouvernance, ainsi que pour les architectes de services cloud, afin de mettre en place des mesures appropriées et des stratégies d'atténuation. De plus, la norme s'adresse à un public varié, ce qui en accentue la pertinence. En ciblant non seulement les gestionnaires d'enregistrements, mais aussi les archivistes, les développeurs de logiciels de gestion des enregistrements déployés dans le cloud et les fournisseurs de services de gestion des enregistrements basés sur le cloud, ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 offre des orientations précieuses pour chaque acteur impliqué dans ce processus. En définitive, cette norme est d'une grande pertinence dans le paysage actuel de la technologie cloud et de la gestion des données, offrant des recommandations illustrées qui garantissent que les organisations peuvent tirer parti des avantages du cloud tout en gérant efficacement les risques associés à la gestion des enregistrements.

Die ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 ist ein entscheidendes Dokument, das sich mit der Verwaltung von Aufzeichnungen in Cloud-Computing-Umgebungen befasst und eine umfassende Modellierung für das Cloud-Records-Management bietet. Der Umfang dieses Standards umfasst eine detaillierte Analyse der Risiken und Herausforderungen, die von Records-Managern berücksichtigt werden sollten, bevor sie Cloud-Dienste für das Records-Management übernehmen. Ein wesentlicher Stärke dieses Standards ist das angebotene Stakeholder-Modell, das die verschiedenen interessierten Parteien identifiziert und deren Rollen innerhalb des Cloud-Records-Management-Prozesses klar definiert. Darüber hinaus beschreibt der Standard relevante Prozesse und Metadaten, die für die effektive Verwaltung von Aufzeichnungen in der Cloud erforderlich sind. Die spezifizierte Architektur und die unterschiedlichen Anwendungsfälle erleichtern das Verständnis und die Umsetzung der Richtlinien für Fachleute und Entwickler im Bereich des Cloud-Computing. Die Klassifikation von Risiken und Problemen in interne und externe Risikoszenarien stellt eine weitere Stärke dar, da sie eine differenzierte Betrachtung der Herausforderungen ermöglicht. Interne Risiken beziehen sich auf die Cloud-Dienste, Systeme und Stakeholder, während externe Risiken im sozialen und rechtlichen Kontext, in dem Cloud-Dienste agieren, verankert sind. Diese differenzierte Herangehensweise ist für die Zielgruppen, die sich auf die ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 beziehen – einschließlich Records-, Informations-, Wissens- und Governance-Professionals, Cloud-Service-Architekten, Archivare und Entwickler von cloudbasierten Records-Management-Software – von großem Wert. Die Relevanz dieses Dokuments kann nicht hoch genug eingeschätzt werden, da Cloud-Computing zunehmend in der Geschäftswelt Einzug hält. Die Bereitstellung eines klaren Modells und die Betrachtung von Risiken schaffen das notwendige Bewusstsein und die Grundlage für die sichere und effektive Nutzung von Cloud-Diensten im Zusammenhang mit der Verwaltung von Aufzeichnungen. Insgesamt stellt die ISO/TR 22428-1:2020 einen unverzichtbaren Leitfaden für alle Fachleute dar, die in diesem Bereich tätig sind und die Vorteile von Cloud-Services zur Optimierung ihrer Records-Management-Praktiken nutzen möchten.

ISO/TR 22428-1:2020は、クラウドコンピューティング環境における記録管理を効果的に行うためのモデルを提示し、記録管理者がクラウドサービスを採用する際に考慮すべきリスクや問題について詳述しています。この文書のスコープは、クラウド記録管理の特定の側面を網羅しており、ステークホルダーモデル、プロセス、メタデータ、アーキテクチャ、利用事例が含まれています。 本標準の強みの一つは、内部および外部のリスクと問題を明確に分類している点です。内部リスクはクラウドサービスやシステム、そして関係者に関連しており、一方で外部リスクはクラウドサービスが活動する社会的および法的文脈において発生することを指摘しています。このような詳細な分析により、記録管理者はリスクを包括的に理解し、適切な対策を講じることが可能となります。 また、ISO/TR 22428-1は、記録、情報、知識の専門家やクラウドサービスアーキテクト、アーカイブ管理者、クラウドに展開された記録管理ソフトウェアの開発者、ICTスタッフ、クラウドベースの記録管理サービスを提供する事業者といった多様なターゲットオーディエンスに向けて作成されています。このような幅広い対象層にリーチできることは、標準の関連性を高める要因となっています。 最後に、この標準文書は、クラウド環境下での記録管理の現状と課題に焦点を当てており、今後の記録管理手法の発展に寄与する重要な資料となるでしょう。全体として、ISO/TR 22428-1:2020は、クラウドコンピューティングにおける記録管理の指標として非常に有用であり、強固な基盤を提供するものです。