Railway applications - Compatibility between rolling stock and train detection systems

Describes a procedure for mutual acceptance of rolling stock to run over specific routes. Describes the methods of measurement of interference currents, the methods of measurement of the susceptibility of train detection systems, the characterisation of traction power supplies and the procedure for acceptance. The result of the acceptance procedure is a structured justification document referred to as a "compatibility case".

Applications ferroviaires - Compatibilité entre matériel roulant et systèmes de détection de train

Décrit une procédure d'acceptation mutuelle des matériels roulants sur un itinéraire donné. Décrit les méthodes de mesure des courants d'interférence, les méthodes de mesure de la susceptibilité des systèmes de détection de train, la caractérisation des alimentations de traction ainsi que la procédure d'acceptation. Le résultat de cette procédure d'acceptation est un document de justification structuré appelé "dossier de compatibilité".

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
17-Sep-2007
Current Stage
DELPUB - Deleted Publication
Start Date
04-Dec-2024
Completion Date
29-Jul-2022
Ref Project

Relations

Standard
IEC 62427:2007 - Railway applications - Compatibility between rolling stock and train detection systems
English and French language
90 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


IEC 62427
Edition 1.0 2007-09
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD
NORME
INTERNATIONALE
Railway applications – Compatibility between rolling stock and train detection
systems
Applications ferroviaires – Compatibilité entre matériel roulant et systèmes de
détection de train
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by
any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either IEC or
IEC's member National Committee in the country of the requester.
If you have any questions about IEC copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this publication,
please contact the address below or your local IEC member National Committee for further information.

Droits de reproduction réservés. Sauf indication contraire, aucune partie de cette publication ne peut être reproduite
ni utilisée sous quelque forme que ce soit et par aucun procédé, électronique ou mécanique, y compris la photocopie
et les microfilms, sans l'accord écrit de la CEI ou du Comité national de la CEI du pays du demandeur.
Si vous avez des questions sur le copyright de la CEI ou si vous désirez obtenir des droits supplémentaires sur cette
publication, utilisez les coordonnées ci-après ou contactez le Comité national de la CEI de votre pays de résidence.

IEC Central Office
3, rue de Varembé
CH-1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland
Email: inmail@iec.ch
Web: www.iec.ch
About the IEC
The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is the leading global organization that prepares and publishes
International Standards for all electrical, electronic and related technologies.

About IEC publications
The technical content of IEC publications is kept under constant review by the IEC. Please make sure that you have the
latest edition, a corrigenda or an amendment might have been published.
ƒ Catalogue of IEC publications: www.iec.ch/searchpub
The IEC on-line Catalogue enables you to search by a variety of criteria (reference number, text, technical committee,…).
It also gives information on projects, withdrawn and replaced publications.
ƒ IEC Just Published: www.iec.ch/online_news/justpub
Stay up to date on all new IEC publications. Just Published details twice a month all new publications released. Available
on-line and also by email.
ƒ Electropedia: www.electropedia.org
The world's leading online dictionary of electronic and electrical terms containing more than 20 000 terms and definitions
in English and French, with equivalent terms in additional languages. Also known as the International Electrotechnical
Vocabulary online.
ƒ Customer Service Centre: www.iec.ch/webstore/custserv
If you wish to give us your feedback on this publication or need further assistance, please visit the Customer Service
Centre FAQ or contact us:
Email: csc@iec.ch
Tel.: +41 22 919 02 11
Fax: +41 22 919 03 00
A propos de la CEI
La Commission Electrotechnique Internationale (CEI) est la première organisation mondiale qui élabore et publie des
normes internationales pour tout ce qui a trait à l'électricité, à l'électronique et aux technologies apparentées.

A propos des publications CEI
Le contenu technique des publications de la CEI est constamment revu. Veuillez vous assurer que vous possédez
l’édition la plus récente, un corrigendum ou amendement peut avoir été publié.
ƒ Catalogue des publications de la CEI: www.iec.ch/searchpub/cur_fut-f.htm
Le Catalogue en-ligne de la CEI vous permet d’effectuer des recherches en utilisant différents critères (numéro de référence,
texte, comité d’études,…). Il donne aussi des informations sur les projets et les publications retirées ou remplacées.
ƒ Just Published CEI: www.iec.ch/online_news/justpub
Restez informé sur les nouvelles publications de la CEI. Just Published détaille deux fois par mois les nouvelles
publications parues. Disponible en-ligne et aussi par email.
ƒ Electropedia: www.electropedia.org
Le premier dictionnaire en ligne au monde de termes électroniques et électriques. Il contient plus de 20 000 termes et
définitions en anglais et en français, ainsi que les termes équivalents dans les langues additionnelles. Egalement appelé
Vocabulaire Electrotechnique International en ligne.
ƒ Service Clients: www.iec.ch/webstore/custserv/custserv_entry-f.htm
Si vous désirez nous donner des commentaires sur cette publication ou si vous avez des questions, visitez le FAQ du
Service clients ou contactez-nous:
Email: csc@iec.ch
Tél.: +41 22 919 02 11
Fax: +41 22 919 03 00
IEC 62427
Edition 1.0 2007-09
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD
NORME
INTERNATIONALE
Railway applications – Compatibility between rolling stock and train detection
systems
Applications ferroviaires – Compatibilité entre matériel roulant et systèmes de
détection de train
INTERNATIONAL
ELECTROTECHNICAL
COMMISSION
COMMISSION
ELECTROTECHNIQUE
PRICE CODE
INTERNATIONALE
X
CODE PRIX
ICS 45.060 ISBN 2-8318-9309-7
– 2 – 62427 © IEC:2007
CONTENTS
FOREWORD.4
INTRODUCTION.6

1 Scope.8
2 Normative references .8
3 Terms and definitions .8
4 Acceptance process .11
4.1 Overview .11
4.2 Responsibilities .11
4.3 Acceptance process .12
4.4 Compatibility case .14
4.5 Quality management .14
4.6 Route identification.15
4.7 Characterisation .15
4.8 Tests.15
4.9 Compatibility analysis.15
4.10 Certificate of acceptance.16
5 Characterisation of train detection systems .17
5.1 Objective of procedure .17
5.2 Physical compatibility .17
5.3 Electromagnetic compatibility .18
5.4 Factor of safety .21
5.5 Track circuit susceptibility .21
5.6 Wheel detector susceptibility .22
5.7 Train detection system gabarit.22
5.8 Interference signal generated by rolling stock and substations .22
5.9 Characterisation report.23
6 Characterisation of rolling stock.24
6.1 Objectives of procedure.24
6.2 Description of rolling stock and factors affecting its characteristics.24
6.3 Configuration (design status).24
6.4 Test plan .25
6.5 Test report .26
6.6 Archive of test results.27
7 Characterisation of traction power supply systems .27
7.1 Objective.27
7.2 DC traction power supplies.27
7.3 AC traction power supplies .28

Annex A (informative) Guidelines for the determination of susceptibility of train
detection systems .
Annex B (informative) Guidelines for the measurement of rolling stock characteristics.37
Annex C (informative) Factors affecting rolling stock characteristics .39
Annex D (informative) DC traction power supplies .40
Annex E (informative) AC traction power supplies.42

62427 © IEC:2007 – 3 –
Bibliography.45

Figure 1 – Sources of electromagnetic interference .6
Figure 2 – Parties concerned in the acceptance process.11
Figure 3 – Acceptance process .13
Figure 4 – Relationship between gabarit and permissible interference .16
Figure A.1 – Interference mechanism with rails intact .29
Figure A.2 – Interference mechanism with self-revealing broken rail .29
Figure A.3 – Interference mechanism with unrevealed broken rail.30
Figure A.4 – Double rail track circuit .30
Figure A.5 – Double rail track circuit with broken rail.31
Figure A.6 – Interference mechanism due to voltage between axles – Case 1.31
Figure A.7 – Interference mechanism due to voltage between axles – Case 2.32
Figure A.8 – Effect of inter-vehicle current .32
Figure A.9 – Equivalent circuit for Figure A.8 .33
Figure A.10 – Example of radiated interference .34
Figure A.11 – Sensitive zone of wheel detectors .35
Figure B.1 – Example of a system for the measurement of interference currents.37
Figure D.1 – Rolling stock with DC supply.41
Figure D.2 – Circulation of interference current generated by rolling stock.41
Figure D.3 – Circulation of interference current generated by the substation.41
Figure E.1 – Rolling stock and AC supply without power converter .43
Figure E.2 – Rolling stock and AC supply with power converter .43
Figure E.3 – Circulation of interference current generated by rolling stock .43
Figure E.4 – Circulation of interference current generated by the substation.44

– 4 – 62427 © IEC:2007
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION
____________
RAILWAY APPLICATIONS –
COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN ROLLING STOCK
AND TRAIN DETECTION SYSTEMS
FOREWORD
1) The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is a worldwide organization for standardization comprising
all national electrotechnical committees (IEC National Committees). The object of IEC is to promote
international co-operation on all questions concerning standardization in the electrical and electronic fields. To
this end and in addition to other activities, IEC publishes International Standards, Technical Specifications,
Technical Reports, Publicly Available Specifications (PAS) and Guides (hereafter referred to as “IEC
Publication(s)”). Their preparation is entrusted to technical committees; any IEC National Committee interested
in the subject dealt with may participate in this preparatory work. International, governmental and non-
governmental organizations liaising with the IEC also participate in this preparation. IEC collaborates closely
with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in accordance with conditions determined by
agreement between the two organizations.
2) The formal decisions or agreements of IEC on technical matters express, as nearly as possible, an international
consensus of opinion on the relevant subjects since each technical committee has representation from all
interested IEC National Committees.
3) IEC Publications have the form of recommendations for international use and are accepted by IEC National
Committees in that sense. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure that the technical content of IEC
Publications is accurate, IEC cannot be held responsible for the way in which they are used or for any
misinterpretation by any end user.
4) In order to promote international uniformity, IEC National Committees undertake to apply IEC Publications
transparently to the maximum extent possible in their national and regional publications. Any divergence
between any IEC Publication and the corresponding national or regional publication shall be clearly indicated in
the latter.
5) IEC provides no marking procedure to indicate its approval and cannot be rendered responsible for any
equipment declared to be in conformity with an IEC Publication.
6) All users should ensure that they have the latest edition of this publication.
7) No liability shall attach to IEC or its directors, employees, servants or agents including individual experts and
members of its technical committees and IEC National Committees for any personal injury, property damage or
other damage of any nature whatsoever, whether direct or indirect, or for costs (including legal fees) and
expenses arising out of the publication, use of, or reliance upon, this IEC Publication or any other IEC
Publications.
8) Attention is drawn to the Normative references cited in this publication. Use of the referenced publications is
indispensable for the correct application of this publication.
9) Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this IEC Publication may be the subject of
patent rights. IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
International Standard IEC 62427 has been prepared by IEC technical committee 9: Electrical
equipment and systems for railways.
It was submitted to the National Committees for voting under the Fast Track Procedure as the
following documents:
FDIS Report on voting
9/1058/FDIS 9/1088/RVD
Full information on the voting for the approval of this standard can be found in the report on
voting indicated in the above table.
This document is based on EN 50238.
This publication has been drafted in accordance with the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.

62427 © IEC:2007 – 5 –
The committee has decided that the contents of this publication will remain unchanged until
the maintenance result date indicated on the IEC web site under "http://webstore.iec.ch" in the
data related to the specific publication. At this date, the publication will be
• reconfirmed,
• withdrawn,
• replaced by a revised edition, or
• amended.
– 6 – 62427 © IEC:2007
INTRODUCTION
This Standard defines a process to obtain the assurance that specific rolling stock operating
on a specific route does not interfere with train detection systems installed on this route.
Compatibility problems between train detection systems and rolling stock are a significant
obstacle to cross-acceptance of rolling stock in Europe. Unfortunately it is not possible to
establish general rules for the maximum levels of interference allowed valid for every country.
This is due to the great diversity of rolling stock, power supply and return current systems,
and train detection systems installed in Europe. This diversity leads to consideration of the
problem of compatibility of rolling stock and train detection systems for specific routes to
avoid unnecessarily restrictive specifications.
Compatibility is determined by both physical and electromagnetic considerations. With regard
to EMC, the need is not for general values for maximum levels of interference permitted, but
for convenient methods by which to specify the level of interference allowed for operation on
specific routes.
Interference may be caused by
– rail currents,
– electromagnetic fields,
– differential voltage between axles,
as shown in Figure 1.
Feeder
station
Electromagnetic field Rail current
transfer functions transfer functions
Wheel
Track circuit Others
detector
IEC  1747/07
Figure 1 – Sources of electromagnetic interference

62427 © IEC:2007 – 7 –
In practice, the susceptibility of the system is determined by
– the sensitivity of individual components of the system,
– the application of the components, i.e. the configuration of the system.
Therefore the problems concerning track circuits and axle counters or wheel detection
systems will be considered separately.
For determining the susceptibility of train detection systems, laboratory/simulation testing
methods as well as methods to conduct tests on the “real railway” are proposed. Modelling
enables worst-case conditions to be simulated. In addition, particular test sites are used
because, from experience, they are known to provide the test evidence required. Then, taking
account of the experience of the railways, it is possible to establish a general method for
determining the susceptibility of train detection systems, described in this Standard.
Before measuring the interference level on rolling stock, a sufficient knowledge of the electric
circuit diagram of the power equipment is required, e.g. switching frequencies of on-board
static converters, type of regulation used for power converters, resonant frequency of each
filter, operating limits under high and low supply voltages, downgraded modes of operation,
etc.
– 8 – 62427 © IEC:2007
RAILWAY APPLICATIONS –
COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN ROLLING STOCK
AND TRAIN DETECTION SYSTEMS
1 Scope
This International Standard describes a procedure for mutual acceptance of rolling stock to
run over specific routes. It describes the methods of measurement of interference currents,
the methods of measurement of the susceptibility of train detection systems, the
characterisation of traction power supplies and the procedure for acceptance. The result of
the acceptance procedure is a structured justification document referred to as a “compatibility
case”, which documents the evidence that the conditions for compatibility have been satisfied.
The procedure is also applied to modifications of rolling stock, traction power supply or train
detection systems which are considered to affect compatibility.
The scope of the compatibility case is restricted to the demonstration of compatibility of rolling
stock with a train detection system’s characterisation (e.g. gabarit). Train detection system in
this standard refers only to a track circuit or those using wheel detector.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document.
For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition
of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
IEC 62278, Railway applications – Specification and demonstration of reliability, availability,
maintainability and safety (RAMS)
IEC 60850, Railway applications – Supply voltages of traction systems
ISO/IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration
laboratories
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
3.1
accepting body
body responsible for the evaluation of the compatibility case and the issue of a certificate of
acceptance. The authority is assigned by National Law.
3.2
compatibility case
a set of documents which records the evidence demonstrating the degree of compatibility
between rolling stock, traction power supplies and train detection systems for a specific route
or specific railway network
62427 © IEC:2007 – 9 –
3.3
certificate of acceptance
written autorisation from the accepting body that the compatibility case is acceptable to allow
the new or modified systems to enter service. Relations with legislation should be determined
nationally.
3.4
degraded modes
modes of operation in the presence of faults which have been anticipated in the design of the
rolling stock. Degraded modes will normally allow the rolling stock to complete its journey
3.5
gabarit
the maximum permissible levels of interference signal, with respect to frequencies and
duration, to which a train detection system may be exposed
3.6
railway infrastructure authority
the body responsible for the safety of the track and signalling systems
3.7
right side failure
failure of a signalling system which results in a more restrictive condition for the movement of
traffic than is appropriate
3.8
rolling stock operator
body responsible for the operation and maintenance of the rolling stock
3.9
wheel detector
sensor which detects the passage of a wheel. It may be used as part of an axle counter
system or as a treadle
3.10
wrong side failure
failure of a signalling system which results in a less restrictive condition for the movement of
traffic than is appropriate
3.11
factor of safety
margin between the level of per train emissions and actual susceptibility of track circuit. It
covers safety or availability depending on whether wrong side failure or right side failure
mechanism is considered.
3.12
signalling system
assembly of sub-systems, and components connected together in an organised way to
achieve specific signalling functionality, of which train detection is a particular sub-system,
referred to as ‘system’ in the context of this standard
3.13
rolling stock
general term covering all vehicles with or without motors. For the purposes of this standard
rolling stock is equivalent to influencing unit.
[IEV 811-02-01, modified]
– 10 – 62427 © IEC:2007
3.14
traction power supply system
3.14.1
(traction) substation
installation the main function of which is to supply a contact line system and at which the
voltage of a primary supply system, and in certain cases the frequency, is transformed to the
voltage and the frequency of the contact line
[IEC 62128-1]
3.14.2
(traction) switching station
installation from which electrical energy can be distributed to different feeding sections or
from which different feeding sections can be switched on and off or can be interconnected
[IEC 62128-1]
3.14.3
feeding section
section of the traction power supply system which may be isolated from other sections or
feeders of the system by means of switching devices
[IEC 62128-1]
3.14.4
feeder
electrical connection between the contact line and a substation or a switching station
[IEC 62128-1]
3.14.5
feeding point
point at which the feeders or line feeders are connected to the contact line
[IEC 62128-1]
3.14.6
contact line
a conductor system for supplying electric energy to vehicles through current-collecting
equipment
[IEV 811-33-01]
3.15
axle counter
a system using counting points with wheel detector and a counter which detects the
occupancy of a section of track by comparing the number of axles which enter the section with
the number of axles which leave the section, parity of the numbers being necessary to give a
clear indication
[IEV 821-03-41, modified]
3.16
susceptibility
the inability of a device, equipment or system to perform without degradation in the presence
of an electromagnetic disturbance
[IEV 161-01-21, modified]
62427 © IEC:2007 – 11 –
3.17
train detection
safe recognition of the presence or absence of any trains on a defined section of the track or
at a given point
[IEC 62290-1]
3.18
track circuit
an electrical circuit of which the rails of a track section form a part, with usually a source of
current connected at one end and a detection device at the other end for detecting whether
this track section is clear or occupied by a vehicle
NOTE In a continuous signalling system, the track circuit may be used to transmit information between the ground
and the train.
[IEV 821-03-01]
4 Acceptance process
4.1 Overview
The parties concerned in the acceptance process are shown in Figure 2.
Acceptance
Railway
Industry Other authorities
infrastructure
(signalling) or operators
authority
Laboratory
Compatibility
case
Rolling stock
Industry
operator
(rolling stock)
Laboratory
Acceptance
Accepting
certificate
body
IEC  1748/07
Figure 2 – Parties concerned in the acceptance process
4.2 Responsibilities
The responsibility for demonstrating compatibility between rolling stock, train detection and
traction power supply systems, and for maintaining it over the full life cycle of the equipment,
is shared between those parties responsible for the particular railway infrastructure and the
particular rolling stock. Specific responsibilities for a given compatibility case, including the
party taking the lead role, shall be assigned as per national practice. The documentation, in
the form of a compatibility case, shall be submitted to an accepting body, and shall be
reviewed when any modification is carried out.

– 12 – 62427 © IEC:2007
4.2.1 Railway infrastructure authority
For a defined route (the application of interest), the railway infrastructure authority should
characterise all train detection systems and the traction power supply system.
4.2.2 Rolling stock operator
The rolling stock operator should characterise the interference which may be generated and
propagated by the rolling stock.
4.2.3 Accepting body
The accepting body shall review submitted documents and as a result issue a certificate of
acceptance. As part of this process, the accepting body should ensure that the compatibility
case is reviewed by experts who are qualified in accordance with national practice to assess
and evaluate it.
4.3 Acceptance process
The acceptance process is summarised in Figure 3.

62427 © IEC:2007 – 13 –
Assign responsibilities and
1)
begin compatibility case
Characterisation of
Description of rolling
train detection
3)
2) stock Description of power
system
4)
supply system
5)
Theoretical analysis
Additional
information 6)
Test plan
and/or
measurements
No
Test plan approved
by accepting body?
Yes
Testing and test
7)
report
Mandatory action
Yes
More information
needed ?
No
Optional action
Yes
No
Can a compatibility
case be made?
Modify
Submission to Modify train
Modify
power
8)
accepting body detection
rolling
supply
system?
stock?
system?
Yes
Economic and technical comparison
More information
of available solutions : selection of
needed?
optimum solution
No
No No No
Acceptance with
Acceptance with
Unrestricted
permanent restrictions?
temporary restrictions?
acceptance?
Yes Yes Yes
Yes
More information
needed?
No
Temporary
9) Restricted No
Full acceptance 9)
9) 9)
acceptance
acceptance certificate
IEC  1749/07
Figure 3 – Acceptance process
– 14 – 62427 © IEC:2007
Notes of Figure 3.
No
Title References Responsible
1) Assign responsibilities and 4.4 Compatibility case To be agreed between the
begin compatibility case parties defined in 4.1
4.6 Route identification
2) Characterisation of train 4.7 Characterisation Infrastructure manager
detection system
5 Characterisation of train detection
systems
3) Description of rolling stock 4.7 Characterisation Rolling stock operator
6 Characterisation of rolling stock
4) Description of power supply 4.7 Characterisation Infrastructure manager
system
7 Characterisation of traction power
supply systems
5) Theoretical analysis 4.9 Compatibility analysis To be agreed between the
parties defined in 4.1
6) Test plan 4.8 Tests To be agreed between the
parties defined in 4.1
6.4 Test plan
7.2.1 Test procedure
7.3.1 Test procedure
7) Testing and test report 4.8 Tests To be agreed between the
parties defined in 4.1
6.5 Test report
8) Submission to accepting body To be agreed between the
parties defined in 4.1
9) Acceptance / No certificate 4.10 Certificate of acceptance Accepting body

4.4 Compatibility case
A compatibility case shall be prepared, including but not limited to, the following:
– scope of compatibility case;
– route identification;
– characterisation of train detection systems;
– characterisation of traction power supply system;
– characterisation of rolling stock;
– assumptions made;
– test report;
– evidence of quality management;
– related compatibility cases;
– assessment of compatibility.
The compatibility case shall be submitted to an accepting body for approval.
4.5 Quality management
Quality management systems shall be in place. The importance of configuration management
should be noted.
The configuration state of the relevant infrastructure and rolling stock (including maintenance
processes and schedules) shall be recorded and referenced within the compatibility case. Any

62427 © IEC:2007 – 15 –
subsequent changes to these configurations shall lead to an examination of the continued
validity of the compatibility case.
The organisation conducting the tests shall be able to demonstrate its competence in
accordance with recognised national practice to make measurements in a traction
environment. It should preferably be certified to ISO/IEC 17025, but in any case shall have a
documented quality system in accordance with a recognised standard.
In order to maintain objectivity (e.g. in the event that tests are being conducted by a
manufacturer on equipment of his own supply) the organisation conducting tests should be
subject to an audit by the accepting body.
4.6 Route identification
In order to accept a particular rolling stock in respect of a particular route or network, the
different types and applications of train detection systems and traction power supply systems
on the route and on adjacent routes which may be affected shall be identified. In addition to
the intended operational route(s), alternative route(s) which may be required in the event of
disruption to traffic shall also be considered.
4.7 Characterisation
The characteristics of the identified systems shall be obtained in accordance with the
following clauses:
– train detection systems: 5;
– rolling stock: 6;
– power supply system: 7.
4.8 Tests
A test plan shall be prepared to deliver the compatibility criteria as described in Figure 4 and
approved by the accepting body.
Tests shall be conducted in accordance with the test plan and a test report produced to
support the compatibility case.
4.9 Compatibility analysis
In general terms, it shall be demonstrated that the rolling stock characteristics for generated
and propagated interference comply with the train detection system gabarit, under defined
operating conditions, including degraded modes. Their relationship is shown in Figure 4. The
information flow may be in either direction depending on which system is to be changed.

– 16 – 62427 © IEC:2007
TRAIN DETECTION SYSTEM SUBSTATION ROLLING STOCK

Permissible
Equipment Transfer Permissible
interference
sensitivity function interference
per on-board
source
Factor of Summation
safety rules
Total
interference
from on-board
sources
Summation
rules
ROLLING STOCK
AND SUBSTATION
Compare
Total
Gabarit
interference
IEC  1750/07
Figure 4 – Relationship between gabarit and permissible interference
Additionally, the physical characteristics of the rolling stock shall be demonstrated to be
compatible with the train detection systems.
The compatibility analysis is mandatory and shall explain the technical principles which
ensure compatibility, including (or giving reference to) all supporting evidence e.g.,
calculations, test plans and results, etc.
The method of analysis of fault modes shall be agreed between the parties listed in 4.2. If the
parties consider it to be necessary, for complex systems, reference may be made to
subclauses 4.6 and 6.3 of IEC 62278.
4.10 Certificate of acceptance
The accepting body shall review the compatibility case and issue a certificate of acceptance
to the party requesting the change.
It is recognised that characterisation of interference generated and propagated by rolling
stock can be a time consuming process, which may require a significant amount of testing
during service operations in order to refine the characteristics. Therefore, provided that the
risks to all parties can be demonstrated to be acceptable, temporary acceptance may be
given prior to full acceptance. This also allows for the identification of contributory factors
which had been overlooked in the preparation of the compatibility case.
Any temporary acceptance shall be time limited and be provided for a specific agreed
purpose, whilst additional measures to identify interference and mitigate against possible
hazards should be implemented.

62427 © IEC:2007 – 17 –
In the event that the assessment identifies either a non-compliance with the existing gabarit,
or a worsening of the existing gabarit (e.g. higher susceptibility), such that rolling stock with
existing route acceptance becomes non-compliant, then the relevant Railway Infrastructure
Authorities and rolling stock operators shall jointly determine the modifications to
infrastructure and/or rolling stock to be made and initiate acceptance processes where
applicable. If modifications are not possible or are not carried out, permanent restrictions shall
be applied. Restrictions are usually controlled by the railway infrastructure manager
(authority) unless established otherwise by national practice.
5 Characterisation of train detection systems
5.1 Objective of procedure
To ensure the correct operation of train detection systems, their physical and electromagnetic
properties shall be checked against those of the rolling stock and the traction power supply
system.
5.2 Physical compatibility
5.2.1 Track circuits
Physical compatibility, including but not limited to the following aspects, shall be considered:
– minimum track circuit length;
– minimum train length;
– maximum and minimum distance between the first and last axle of a vehicle;
– characteristics of boundary definition of jointless track circuit;
– maximum speed of trains;
– response time of track circuits;
– shunt values of track circuits;
– shunt impedance of trains, and reliability of shunting in all service conditions including the
influence of brake shoes on the shunting impedance;
– axle loads of vehicles;
– axle spacing;
– body overhang;
– track characteristics;
– substations earthing arrangements.
5.2.2 Wheel detectors
Physical compatibility, including but not limited to the following aspects, shall be considered:
– wheel geometry;
– speed of trains;
– wheel material;
– equipment which may be mistaken for a wheel, e.g. track brakes or metal assemblies
which are mounted close to the rail head.
5.2.2.1 Wheel dimensions and material
Axle counters and treadles are generally specified to detect reliably wheel types used on main
line vehicles. Other vehicle types may require special settings of the wheel detectors.

– 18 – 62427 © IEC:2007
5.2.2.2 Interfering equipment
Equipment mounted within the immediate vicinity of the rail may interfere with the reliability of
wheel detection either by fouling mechanically or due to its electromagnetic properties (see
Annex A).
This aspect of compatibility shall be assessed by testing.
5.3 Electromagnetic compatibility
This subclause describes the measurement of the gabarit of the train detection system. It
defines the general approach to be adopted, but since every installation is different in detail, it
cannot describe the whole process exactly. The compatibility case shall cover all credible
configurations and parameters. Some examples of configuration and models are given in
Annex A.
The required measurements are as follows.
5.3.1 The sensitivity of the train detection system equipment (see 5.3.3.1 for track circuits;
5.3.4.1 for wheel detectors).
5.3.2 The “transfer function” relating the interference signal at the train detection system
equipment to the interference generated by the rolling stock (see 5.3.3.2 for track circuits;
5.3.4.2 for wheel detectors).
Let the transfer function be denoted by F.
Let the interference signal at the train detection system equipment be denoted by I .
TDS
Let the interference signal generated by the rolling stock be denoted by I .
RS
The interference signal is then:
I = F × I
TDS RS
Hence I = I / F
RS TDS
The maximum permissible interference signal at the train detection system equipment I
TDSmax
is determined by the sensitivity of the train detection system equipment. Let the total
permissible interference generated by rolling stock be denoted by I . Then:
RStot
I = I / F
RStot TDSmax
Where multiple sources may contribute to the total interference signal, the permissible
interference per source shall take this into account (see 5.8).
Note that the permissible interference signal will have two values determined by the following
criteria:
– the signal which may cause the train detection system to show clear when it is in fact
occupied (a wrong side failure, i.e. a matter of safety);
– the signal which may cause the train detection system to show occupied when it is in fact
clear (a right side failure, i.e. a matter of reliability). The effect on interlocking logic shall
however be considered.
62427 © IEC:2007 – 19 –
5.3.3 Track circuits
5.3.3.1 Sensitivity and susceptibility of equipment alone
The sensitivity of the track circuit equipment itself shall be determined. In general the
susceptibility of the receiver will be more significant than that of the transmitter and will be the
determining factor in the permissible level of interference; however the susceptibility of the
transmitter shall also be checked.
Where the sensitivity of the track circuit is adjustable, it shall be measured for all the relevant
settings and in particular for the worst case settings.
The susceptibility shall be determined as follows.
5.3.3.1.1 The parameters (amplitudes, frequencies and durations) of the voltage(s),
current(s) or electro-magnetic fields which may cause the receiver to be energised, in the
absence of a signal from the transmitter, such that a “track circuit unoccupied” indication is
given.
NOTE Some types of track circuit receivers which are designed to operate with an amplitude modulated signal
may also be energised by a combination of unmodulated frequencies, and some types of track circuit receivers
which are designed to operate with a frequency modulated signal may also be energised by one or more amplitude
modulated frequencies.
5.3.3.1.2 The parameters (amplitudes, frequencies and durations) of the additional voltages,
currents or electro-magnetic fields which may de-energise the receiver, or may influence the
output signal of the transmitter, such that a “track circuit occupied” indication is given.
The above information shall be obtained from the suppliers of the track circuit equipment. If it
is not available (for example in the case of an obsolete design) it shall be obtained by
laboratory measurements.
5.3.3.2 Transfer function of track circuit as installed
The transfer function of the installed track circuit with regard to interference current shall be
determined as follows.
5.3.3.2.1 Determine the electrical equivalent circuit of the track circuit and the traction power
supply system in so far as the latter may affect the track circuit. In doing this all relevant
conductors shall be considered, including catenaries or conductor rails, cross-bonded running
rails, return conductors, impedance bonds, booster transformers, earthed structures, earth
paths, etc. Normally the “worst case” transfer function will correspond to the maximum length
track circuit.
5.3.3.2.2 Set up the equivalent circuit using a real test site or a hardware or software model.
If a model is used it shall be verified by means of comparative site tests.
5.3.3.2.3 Measure the voltage or current at the track circuit equipment terminals resulting
from a current generated by the rolling stock. The transfer function is then the ratio of the
voltage at the track circuit equipment terminals to the interference current.
NOTE 1 The value of the transfer function will depend on the position of the train with respect to the track circuit.
The worst case value should be determined.
NOTE 2 If the train has two or more on-board sources, or is composed of electric multiple unit stock, or utilises
the rails for the return current path for auxiliary power supplies (see UIC 550), it may have to be represented by
more than one current source.
5.3.3.2.4 Repeat the above tests with fault conditions applied, for example broken rails,
broken cross-bonds and broken return conductors, examples of which are shown in Annex A
(see 4.9). The “worst case” transfer function is the ratio of the highest value of interference

– 20 – 62427 © IEC:2007
voltage at the track circuit equipment terminals observed under fault conditions
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...