EN 9215:2023
(Main)Programme Management - Definition justification and qualification - A guide to drawing up the definition justification plan and of the definition justification dossier
Programme Management - Definition justification and qualification - A guide to drawing up the definition justification plan and of the definition justification dossier
This document sets forth the general rules applying to the justification of the definition of a product (tangible or intangible) and specifies the content of the Definition Justification Plan (DJP) and the Definition Justification Dossier (DJD).
It is applicable to all products designed and developed to fulfil the requirements of a customer expressed in a (Need) Technical Specification. Industrials are advised to apply the following principles to their own needs for justification in their internal customer/supplier relations.
Clause 5 presents the concepts and the documents associated with the justification of the definition and qualification processes.
Clause 6 summarizes the role and the contractual nature of the qualification of the definition.
Clause 7 gives details of the qualification of the definition process, while Clause 8 positions this process in the programme development logic.
The document also describes the differences between the justification and the qualification of the definition and other notions, such as verification, validation or acceptance (Clause 9).
Clause 10 is a guide to the establishment and maintenance of the documents associated with the justification of the definition and qualification processes. Information related to the certification process, even if it is out of the scope of the present document, is also presented in Clause 10, because this process has certain similarities with the justification of the definition and qualification process.
This document belongs to the documents supporting the EN 9200 relating to Project Management Specification.
Programmmanagement - Begründung und Qualifizierung der Definition - Leitfaden für die Ausarbeitung des Definitionsbegründungsplans und des Definitionsbegründungsdossiers
No Scope available
Management de programme - Justification et qualification de la définition - Guide pour l'élaboration du plan de justification de la définition et du dossier de justification de la définition
Le présent document fixe les règles générales relatives à la justification de la définition d'un produit (tangible ou intangible) et précise les contenus du plan de justification de la définition (PJD) et du dossier de justification de la définition (DJD).
Il est applicable à tout produit conçu et développé pour satisfaire aux exigences d'un client exprimées dans une spécification technique de besoin. Il est recommandé aux industriels d’appliquer les principes ci-dessous pour leurs propres besoins de justification dans le cadre de relations client/fournisseur internes.
L’Article 5 présente les concepts et les documents associés aux processus de justification et de qualification de la définition.
L’Article 6 rappelle le rôle et le caractère contractuel de la qualification de la définition.
L’Article 7 détaille le processus de qualification de la définition alors que l’Article 8 positionne ce processus dans la logique de déroulement d’un programme.
Le document présente également les différences entre la justification et la qualification de la définition et les autres notions telles que vérification, validation ou acceptation (Article 9).
L’Article 10 est une aide pour l’établissement et le maintien des documents liés aux processus de justification et de qualification de la définition. Bien qu’en dehors du périmètre du présent document, des informations associées au processus de certification sont également présentées à l’Article 10 car ce processus présente des similitudes avec le processus de justification et de qualification de la définition.
Le présent document fait partie des documents d'accompagnement de la norme EN 9200 relative à la spécification de management de programme.
Upravljanje programov - Definicija upravičenosti in razvrščanja - Vodilo za pripravo načrta za definicijo upravičenosti in dokumentacije definicije upravičenosti
Ta dokument določa splošna pravila, ki veljajo za upravičenost definicije izdelka (snovnega ali nesnovnega), ter določa vsebino načrta za definicijo upravičenosti (DJP) in dokumentacije definicije upravičenosti (DJD).
Uporablja se za vse izdelke, ki so bili zasnovani in razviti za izpolnitev zahtev stranke, izraženih v tehnični specifikaciji (potreb). Za industrijska podjetja je priporočljivo, da v svojih notranjih odnosih s strankami/dobavitelji uporabljajo naslednja načela za upravičenost lastnih potreb.
V točki 5 so predstavljeni koncepti in dokumenti, ki so povezani s postopki definicije upravičenosti in razvrščanja.
V točki 6 sta povzeti vloga in pogodbena narava razvrščanja definicije.
V točki 7 je podrobno opisan postopek razvrščanja definicije, v točki 8 pa je ta postopek umeščen v logiko razvoja programa.
V dokumentu so opisane tudi razlike med upravičenostjo in razvrščanjem definicije ter drugimi pojmi, kot so preverjanje, potrjevanje ali sprejetje (točka 9).
Točka 10 vsebuje vodilo za vzpostavitev in vzdrževanje dokumentov, ki so povezani s postopki definicije upravičenosti in razvrščanja. Informacije, ki so povezane s postopkom certificiranja, čeprav ne spadajo na področje uporabe tega dokumenta, so tudi predstavljene v točki 10, saj je ta postopek do določene mere podoben upravičenosti definicije in postopku razvrščanja.
Ta dokument spada med dokumente, ki podpirajo standard EN 9200, ki se nanaša na specifikacijo vodenja projekta.
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-september-2023
Upravljanje programov - Definicija upravičenosti in razvrščanja - Vodilo za
pripravo načrta za definicijo upravičenosti in dokumentacije definicije
upravičenosti
Programme Management - Definition justification and qualification - A guide to drawing
up the definition justification plan and of the definition justification dossier
Programmmanagement - Begründung und Qualifizierung der Definition - Leitfaden für
die Ausarbeitung des Definitionsbegründungsplans und des
Definitionsbegründungsdossiers
Management de programme - Justification et qualification de la définition - Guide pour
l'élaboration du plan de justification de la définition et du dossier de justification de la
définition
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 9215:2023
ICS:
49.020 Letala in vesoljska vozila na Aircraft and space vehicles in
splošno general
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
EN 9215
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
July 2023
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 49.020
English Version
Programme Management - Definition justification and
qualification - A guide to drawing up the definition
justification plan and of the definition justification dossier
Management de programme - Justification et Programmmanagement - Begründung und
qualification de la définition - Guide pour l'élaboration Qualifizierung der Definition - Leitfaden für die
du plan de justification de la définition et du dossier de Ausarbeitung des Definitionsbegründungsplans und
justification de la définition des Definitionsbegründungsdossiers
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 2 January 2023.
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2023 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN 9215:2023 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents Page
European foreword . 3
1 Scope . 4
2 Normative references . 4
3 Terms and definitions . 4
4 List of acronyms . 7
5 Presentation of the associated concepts and documents. 8
5.1 Qualification of the definition . 8
5.1.1 Purpose of the qualification of the definition . 8
5.1.2 Difference from other types of qualification . 8
5.2 Justification of the definition . 9
5.2.1 Concept . 9
5.2.2 Differences with other related notions . 10
5.3 Justification of the producibility of the definition . 12
6 Role and contractual nature of the qualification of the definition . 12
7 Definition qualification process . 13
7.1 General. 13
7.2 Establishment of the DJP by the supplier . 14
7.3 Approval of the DJP by the customer . 14
7.4 Justification works and elaboration of the DJD by the supplier . 14
7.5 Acceptance of the DJD and the MIJF by the customer . 15
7.6 Qualification tests by the customer . 15
7.7 Qualification review (QR) . 15
7.8 Qualification pronouncement . 16
8 Positioning of the qualification process in the phasing and scheduling . 16
8.1 General case: product without certification and with a designated customer . 16
8.2 Specific cases . 18
8.2.1 Partial qualification of the definition . 18
8.2.2 Reuse of components off-the-shelf (COTS) . 19
8.3 Qualification according to the level of the product breakdown structure . 19
9 Verification and validation (V&V) versus definition justification and qualification . 20
10 Production and content of the associated documents . 21
10.1 Production and content of the DJP . 21
10.1.1 Production of the DJP . 21
10.1.2 Content of the DJP . 21
10.2 Production and content of the DJD . 23
10.2.1 Production of the DJD . 23
10.2.2 Content of the DJD . 23
10.3 Changes to the justification . 24
10.4 Definition justification versus certification . 25
Annex A (informative) An example of the presentation of a Definition Justification Plan — DJP . 29
Annex B (informative) An example of the presentation of a Definition Justification Dossier — DJD . 30
Bibliography . 31
European foreword
This document (EN 9215:2023) has been prepared by the Aerospace and Defence Industries
Association of Europe — Standardization (ASD-STAN).
After enquiries and votes carried out in accordance with the rules of this Association, this
document has received the approval of the National Associations and the Official Services of the
member countries of ASD-STAN, prior to its presentation to CEN.
This document shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical
text or by endorsement, at the latest by January 2024, and conflicting national standards shall be
withdrawn at the latest by January 2024.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject
of patent rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such
patent rights.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the
following countries are bound to implement this document: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia,
Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland,
Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal,
Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Türkiye and the United Kingdom.
1 Scope
This document sets forth the general rules applying to the justification of the definition of a product
(tangible or intangible) and specifies the content of the definition justification plan (DJP) and the
definition justification dossier (DJD).
It is applicable to all products designed and developed to fulfil the requirements of a customer
expressed in a (need) technical specification. Industrials are advised to apply the following principles to
their own needs for justification in their internal customer/supplier relations.
Clause 5 presents the concepts and the documents associated with the justification of the definition and
qualification processes.
Clause 6 summarizes the role and the contractual nature of the qualification of the definition.
Clause 7 gives details of the qualification of the definition process, while Clause 8 positions this process
in the programme development logic.
The document also describes the differences between the justification and the qualification of the
definition and other notions, such as verification, validation or acceptance (Clause 9).
Clause 10 is a guide to the establishment and maintenance of the documents associated with the
justification of the definition and qualification processes. Information related to the certification
process, even if it is out of the scope of the present document, is also presented in Clause 10, because
this process has certain similarities with the justification of the definition and qualification process.
This document belongs to the documents supporting the EN 9200 relating to project management
specification.
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp/
— IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
3.1
document acceptance
decision by which the customer agrees that the document complies with the contractual requirements
Note 1 to entry: in the case of document acceptance, customer’s responsibility is not committed. The document
author remains responsible for its content and is in particular in charge of fixing any non-conformity detected
after acceptance decision.
Note 2 to entry: without any response from the customer within a time limit previously specified, the document is
considered as de facto accepted.
3.2
product acceptance
contractual decision by which the customer agrees that the product is manufactured according to its
qualified definition and the agreed deviations and waivers, and it is free of defects when delivered by
the supplier
3.3
certificate
document formalizing the definition approval issued by the authority when the designer demonstrates
that the product complies with the applicable regulations
3.4
certification
acknowledgement, formalized by a certificate written internally or by an accredited third party, that the
subject of the certification conforms to specified requirements and is acceptable for operational use
Note 1 to entry: the certification may apply to a product, a service, a system, a management system or a person.
Note 2 to entry: this acknowledgement does not systematically authorize actual use.
EXAMPLE Regarding air transports, a specific second certificate issued by national authorities is necessary for
the conformance to its operational requirements.
3.5
definition justification dossier
DJD
document or file gathering all the information of design and tests demonstrating that the definition of
the product described in
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.