EN 16867:2020+A2:2024

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-julij-2024
Stavbno okovje - Mehatronsko okovje za vrata - Zahteve in preskusne metode
(vključno z dopolnilom A2)
Building hardware - Mechatronic door furniture - Requirements and test methods
Schlösser und Baubeschläge - Mechatronische Türbeschläge - Anforderungen und
Prüfverfahren
Quincaillerie pour le bâtiment - Poignée de porte mécatronique - Exigences et méthodes
d'essai
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 16867:2020+A2:2024
ICS:
91.190 Stavbna oprema Building accessories
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EN 16867:2020+A2
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
May 2024
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 91.190 Supersedes EN 16867:2020+A1:2021
English Version
Building hardware - Mechatronic door furniture -
Requirements and test methods
Quincaillerie pour le bâtiment - Poignée de porte Schlösser und Baubeschläge - Mechatronische
mécatronique - Exigences et méthodes d'essai Türbeschläge - Anforderungen und Prüfverfahren
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 27 January 2020 and includes Amendment 1 approved by CEN on 22
September 2021 and Amendment 2 approved by CEN on 3 November 2023.

CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATIO N

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUN G

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2024 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN 16867:2020+A2:2024 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 3
Introduction . 3
1 Scope . 5
2 Normative references . 5
3 Terms and definitions . 7
4 Requirements . 10
5 Test — general and test apparatus . 27
6 Test methods — procedures . 28
7 Classification system . 54
8 Marking . 56
Annex A (normative) MDF suitable for use on fire resistant / smoke control doors . 57
Annex B (normative) Tool sets for attack resistance tests . 58
Annex C (informative) Table of test procedures . 60
Annex D (informative) Manufacturer’s declaration of compliance . 62
Annex E (informative) Examples of calculation of effective code variations for ICC . 64
Bibliography . 66

European foreword
This document (EN 16867:2020+A2:2024) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 33
“Doors, windows, shutters, building hardware and curtain walling”, the secretariat of which is held by
AFNOR.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by November 2024, and conflicting national standards shall
be withdrawn at the latest by November 2024.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
This document includes Amendment 1 approved by CEN on 22 September 2021 and Amendment
2 approved by CEN on 3 November 2023.
This document supersedes #EN 16867:2020+A1:2021$.
The start and finish of text introduced or altered by amendment is indicated in the text by tags !"
and #$.
This document is one of a series of European Standards dedicated to building hardware products.
European Standards for mechanically operated lever handles and knob furniture (EN 1906) are also
available.
The performance tests incorporated in this document are considered to be reproducible and as such will
provide a consistent and objective assessment of the performance of these products throughout CEN
Member.
Any feedback and questions on this document should be directed to the users’ national standards body.
A complete listing of these bodies can be found on the CEN website.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia,
Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland,
Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North
Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and the United
Kingdom.
Introduction
The development of building hardware to include electrically and electronic operations and control has
introduced a large number of products on the market.
For locks and door furniture, the range of electrical or electronic components to be fitted to existing
mechanical locks or door furniture to a complete Mechatronic Door Furniture (MDF) has increased.
Also, complete units with lock and door furniture in unique combination to MDF occur frequently.
Typically, MDF is installed directly on the door leaf and includes all functions like operating the follower
of the lock, reading and decoding the credential and power.
Following components and units are covered by this document.
Type A: Handle or knob operated door furniture with electrically operated actuator, reading unit for
credential and power supply to be combined with a mechanical operated lock where the lock meets
EN 12209 or EN 15685.
Type B: Handle or knob operated door furniture with reading unit for credential and power supply to be
combined with electrically operated locks where the lock meets EN 14846.
This document does not cover electrically operated locks or striking plates in combination with an access
control system not fitted on the door.
This document provides the MDF with requirements for:
— category of use to ensure the performance during its normal use;
— durability to ensure good performance during lifetime;
— specification for system management;
— suitability for use on fire resistant/smoke controlled doors;
— environmental resistance for good performance during lifetime in different environmental
conditions;
— security for different types of credentials;
— attack resistance to ensure use on Burglary resistant doors;
— product information to give summary of the performance.
The performance tests incorporated in this document are considered to be reproducible and as such will
provide a consistent and objective assessment of the performance of these devices throughout CEN
Member States.
It is assumed that MDF will conform to the legal regulations i.e. RED – Radio Equipment Directive
2014/53/EU.
On occasion, there could be a need for additional functions within the design of the MDF. Purchasers
should convince themselves that the products are suitable for their intended use. This is particularly
important when the operation of such additional functions is safety-related. Accordingly, this document
includes assessment of such features when they are included in the MDF design.
1 Scope
1.1 General
This document applies to Mechatronic door furniture (MDF) fitted on the door set which gives the
possibility to control the locking and/or release part through an electronic authorization means. This can
be operable by credentials (i.e. card, code, biometric).
The MDF, according to this document, is combined with locks according to EN 12209, EN 14846,
EN 15685 or can be a part of an emergency exit device according to EN 179, EN 1125 or EN 13637.
The MDF can be standalone or linkable to an external control system.
The document would allow classifying the MDF upon several characteristics such as category of use,
durability, environmental, security, and type of operating device.
The suitability of the MDF for use on fire or smoke-door assemblies is determined by fire resistance tests
conducted in addition to the performance testing specified by this document.
1.2 Exclusions
This document does not cover:
— mechatronic cylinders according to EN 15684;
— electromechanical operated locks and striking plates according to EN 14846.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 636:2012+A1:2015, Plywood — Specifications
EN 1303, Building hardware — Cylinders for locks - Requirements and test methods
EN 1634-1, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies, openable windows and
elements of building hardware — Part 1: Fire resistance test for door and shutter assemblies and openable
windows
EN 1634-2, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies and
elements of building hardware — Part 2: Fire resistance characterisation test for elements of building
hardware
EN 1634-3, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies, openable windows and
elements of building hardware — Part 3: Smoke control test for door and shutter assemblies
EN 1670:2007, Building hardware — Corrosion resistance — Requirements and test methods
EN 1906:2012, Building hardware — Lever handles and knob furniture — Requirements and test methods
EN 14846, Building hardware — Locks and latches — Electromechanically operated locks and striking
plates - Requirements and test methods
EN 15684, Building hardware — Mechatronic cylinders — Requirements and test methods
EN 15685, Building hardware — Requirements and test methods — Multipoint locks, latches and locking
plates — Characteristics and test methods
EN 60068-2-1, Environmental testing — Part 2-1: Tests — Test A: Cold
EN 60068-2-2, Environmental testing — Part 2-2: Tests — Test B: Dry heat
EN 60068-2-6, Environmental testing — Part 2-6: Tests — Test Fc: Vibration (sinusoidal)
EN 60068-2-27, Environmental testing — Part 2-27: Tests — Test Ea and guidance: Shock
EN 60068-2-30, Environmental testing — Part 2-30: Tests — Test Db and guidance: Damp heat, cyclic (12
+ 12 hour cycle)
EN 60529, Degrees of protection provided by enclosures (IP Code)
EN 61000-4-2, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) — Part 4-2: Testing and measurement techniques -
Electrostatic discharge immunity test
EN 61000-4-3, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) — Part 4-3: Testing and measurement techniques —
Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test
EN 61000-4-4, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) — Part 4-4: Testing and measurement techniques —
Electrical fast transient/burst immunity test
EN 61000-4-5, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) — Part 4-5: Testing and measurement techniques —
Surge immunity test
EN 61000-4-11, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) — Part 4-11: Testing and measurement techniques -
Voltage dips, short interruptions and voltage variations immunity tests
EN 61000-4-29, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 4-29: Testing and measurement techniques -
Voltage dips, short interruptions and voltage variations on d.c. input power port immunity tests
EN ISO 10666, Drilling screws with tapping screw thread — Mechanical and functional properties
(ISO 10666)
EN ISO 15480, Fasteners — Hexagon washer head drilling screws with tapping screw thread (ISO 15480)
EN ISO 15481, Cross recessed pan head drilling screws with tapping screw thread (ISO 15481)
EN ISO 15482, Cross recessed countersunk head drilling screws with tapping screw thread (ISO 15482)
EN ISO 15483, Cross recessed raised countersunk head drilling screws with tapping screw thread
(ISO 15483)
ISO/IEC 18033-3, Information technology — Security techniques — Encryption algorithms — Part 3: Block
ciphers
ISO 10899, High-speed steel two-flute twist drills - Technical specifications
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp/
3.1
access card
card or tag, read only or read write, without integrated circuit, does not provide encryption
Note 1 to entry: Can be used with contact or contactless.
EXAMPLE magnetic stripe, barcode
3.2
actuator
electrically operated means to affect or enable operation of the MDF “at rest” position unforced condition
of the lever handle or knob
3.3
attack
unauthorized attempt to operate a MDF by various techniques (destructive and or non-destructive
techniques)
3.4
audit trail
functionality intended to provide a record of MDF and/or its credential events that will identify the
individual credential used to operate the MDF
3.5
backplate
element whose purpose is, firstly, functional, providing a bearing for the rotation of a lever handle or
knob and the means of attachment to the door; and, secondly, decorative, working as a trim plate to cover
holes provided in the door for the passage of spindles, keys or lock cylinders
3.6
coupled
status of the actuator when the bolt and/or latch bolt can be operated by the handle, knob/thumb turn
or electrically
3.7
credential
identification means containing information necessary to authorize operation of the MDF
3.8
cylinder
device, usually distinct from its associated lock or latch, operated by a key, knob or thumb turn
3.9
door furniture
combination of lever handles or knobs on backplates or roses for the purpose of operating latches or
locks
3.10
escutcheon
surround with a shaped hole to accommodate a key or a lock cylinder, with or without a pivoted cover
plate, intended primarily to protect the door leaf from abrasion caused by keys
3.11
external plate
backplate or rose that is fitted on the external face of a door
3.12
False Acceptance Rate
FAR
probability that the system incorrectly authorizes a non-authorized person, due to incorrectly matching
the biometric input with a template
Note 1 to entry: The FAR is normally expressed as a percentage, following the FAR definition this is the percentage
of invalid inputs which are incorrectly accepted.
3.13
FAR-1
1/FAR
inverse of FAR
3.14
half set
single lever or knob attached to a plate or rose which enables operation of the lock or latch from one side
of the door only
3.15
Integrated Circuit Card
ICC
card, tag or device with an integrated circuit
Note 1 to entry: Can be used with contact or contactless (RFID), active or passive.
EXAMPLE RFID, Smartcard.
3.16
inside
side of the door that is facing the controlled area
3.17
internal plate
backplate or rose that is fitted on the internal face of a door
3.18
knob
element for mechanical hand operation of the MDF
3.19
latchplate
backplate adapted for use with a latch and having no keyhole or cylinder aperture
3.20
lever handle
rotatable operating element designed as a lever with a length from its axis of rotation to its free end that
exceeds 75 mm
3.21
manufacturer
natural or legal person who manufactures a construction product or who has such a product designed or
manufactured, or markets that product under his name or trademark and putting the product on the
market
3.22
mechatronic door furniture
MDF
combination of lever handles or knobs on backplates or roses with an integrated or a remote electronic
system, which is to be used with a mechanical or electromechanical lock for the purpose of operating the
lock after verifying the authorization of a credential
3.22.1
mechatronic door furniture
MDF Type A
handle or knob operated door furniture with electrically operated actuator, reading unit for credential
and power supply to be combined with a mechanically-operated lock
Note 1 to entry: The mechanically-operated lock shall meet EN 12209 or EN 15685.
3.22.2
mechatronic door furniture
MDF Type B
handle or knob operated door furniture with reading unit for credential and power supply to be combined
with electrically-operated locks
Note 1 to entry: The electrically-operated lock shall meet EN 14846.
3.23
No Performance Determined
NPD
no requirement and no test required
3.24
outside
side of the door that is facing the uncontrolled area
3.25
rose
element generally circular, but which may have equi-axial or approximately equi-axial shapes such as
square or octagonal, that otherwise has the same features as a backplate
3.26
security furniture
device which provides added resistance to the lock and/or cylinder against physical attack
3.27
spindle
bar, usually square in cross-section, that engages with a follower
3.28
spring-assisted handle/ knob
MDF lever handle or knob furniture that incorporates a spring which assists the return of the handle or
knob to its intended “at-rest” position
3.29
spring-loaded handle/ knob
MDF lever handle or knob that incorporates a spring which returns of the handle or knob to its intended
“at-rest” position without any assistance from the lock
3.30
tester
person who performs the test
3.31
time zone
degree of functionality intended to provide security or convenience by limiting the time that a valid
credential will operate the mechatronic door furniture
3.32
thumb turn
element of the MDF for mechanical finger operation
3.33
uncoupled
status of the actuator when neither bolt or latch bolt can be operated by the handle, knob/ thumb turn or
electrically
3.34
unsprung handle/ knob
MDF handle or knob not fitted with a spring in the backplate or rose
4 Requirements
4.1 General
4.1.1 Classification principle
The structure of the following requirements and test procedures reflects the classification in accordance
with Clause 7.
It is up to the tester together with the manufacturer to decide which requirements and test methods are
relevant to the technical design.
4.1.2 Compatibility between cooperating parts
The manufacturer shall state which cooperating parts have been designed to be used in combination. For
compatibility and functionality between cooperating parts (products) similar classification necessary.
Verified by 6.1.2.
4.1.3 Dangerous substances
National regulations on dangerous substances may require verification and declaration on release, and
sometimes content, when construction products covered by this document are placed on those markets.
In the absence of European harmonized test methods, verification and declaration on release/content
should be done taking into account national provisions in the place of use.
NOTE An informative database covering European and national provisions on dangerous substances is
available at the Construction website on EUROPA accessed through https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-
databases/cp-ds_en.
Verified by 6.1.3.
4.1.4 Operation time for change of status
Operation time for a change of status between uncoupled and coupled status or vice versa shall not
exceed 3 s. Verified by 6.1.4.
4.1.5 Product information requirements
Products classified in accordance with this document shall have clear and detailed instructions for their
installation and maintenance. These instructions shall at least contain:
a) the limitation of the products intended use, the limitation of the door mass and door dimensions,
temperature range and the field of door application and centre distance between axes where
applicable;
b) the spindle and fastening elements shall be specified by the manufacturer. The manufacturer should
state clearly the door thickness or range of door thicknesses for which the furniture is suitable, and
in the case of spring-assisted and spring-loaded furniture, the angle of rotation possible by the
design;
c) information to ensure that the product can conform to the performance requirements of this
document, including known restriction of use, for example conditions under which the product could
be rendered inoperable;
d) an extended temperature range if applicable;
e) information about suitability for use on fire resistance and/or smoke control door set if applicable;
f) information of the risk of misuse, dangerous substances and explosion of heated parts;
g) if applicable information of IP classification according to EN 60529, for outside and/or inside;
h) the information of any override function if applicable (i.e. mechanical cylinder);
i) Optional information about the following product features:
1) time zone possibilities (like number of time profiles, special time functions);
2) the quality of time zones (for example recurring (daily, weekly or calendar);
3) authorization process for an access modification (code, master code);
4) audit trails: quantity, with or without time-stamp, authorized access, denied access also, access
programming;
5) effect on the coupled and uncoupled status during and after the removal of main power;
6) battery change: duration of no data loss;
7) battery low or main power failure, deeper than the minimum of working voltage;
8) external power supply in case of main power failure (if applicable);
9) duration of storage of the audit trails;
10) max number of operation with new battery and theoretical operable time for the MDF in years
without operation with new battery (battery recommended by the manufacturer) and mean
stand-by power consumption in watt;
11) for devices with external power supply:
— allowable voltage range;
— maximum current in A;
— max. power consumption in operation in A/voltage;
— typical standby consumption in watt.
4.2 Category of use (1st character)
4.2.1 General
The grading 1 and 2 for category of use gives the performance aimed for product to the residential market
and grades 3 and 4 focus more on commercial building application see also 7.2.
When the MDF is fitted to the door there shall be no sharp edges.
NOTE This requirement would typically be satisfied by edges that are broken by a chamfer of 0,5 mm
maximum × 45° or by a radius of 0,5 mm minimum.
In the area of rotation of the lever handle or knob, the head of any visible fastening element shall be level
with or below the surface of the backplate or rose after fitting. However, raised head screws may stand
proud of the furniture plate by the domed height of the screw head.
Any fastening element that secures the lever handle or knob to the spindle shall not project above the
surface by more than 1 mm after fitting.
The design of MDF shall ensure that, after fitting, it is not possible for the fingers of a user to be trapped
between lever handle or knob and backplate or rose over the full range of rotation of the lever handle or
knob.
Verify according to 6.2.1.
4.2.2 Axial strength of MDF and fixing
The MDF shall resist an axial force F1 indicated in Table 1 for the different grades without breaking any
component.
The MDF shall be operable and have a maximum permanent deformation δ1 indicated in Table 1 at the
reference point after de-loaded the force.
The test shall be done in accordance with 6.2.2.
4.2.3 Requirement for free play
The maximum total movement of all knobs, thumb turns or lever handles mechanically connected to the
MDF shall not exceed the value specified in Table 1.
See Figure 2. (6.2.3)
The test shall be done in accordance with 6.2.3.
4.2.4 Free angular movement or misalignment
Where applicable the free angular movement or misalignment of the MDF shall not exceed the value
specified in Table 1.
The test shall be done in accordance with 6.2.4.
4.2.5 Operating torque
4.2.5.1 Unsprung and spring assisted lever handles
The torque M1 required to return the unsprung or spring assisted lever handle back to its intended “at-
rest” position shall be not greater than the value specified in Table 1.
After the durability test the spring-assisted lever handles only, the torque M2 required to rotate the lever
handle to a minimum angle of 40° from its intended “at-rest” position shall not exceed the value specified
in Table 1.
The test shall be done in accordance with 6.2.5.1.
4.2.5.2 Unsprung knobs
The return torque M3 value for unsprung knobs shall in either direction not be greater than the value
specified in Table 1.
The test shall be done in accordance with 6.2.5.2.
4.2.5.3 Spring loaded lever handles or knobs
For spring loaded handles, knobs or thumb turns, the torque M4 required to rotate the lever handles,
knobs or thumb turn through an angle α of 60° 0°/+5° or through the angle of rotation possible by the
design shall not be more the value specified in Table 1.
After the durability test and after removal of the torque, the lever handle or knob shall return to its
recorded “at-rest” position within angle φ according to the value specified in Table 1.
The test shall be done in accordance with 6.2.5.3.
4.2.6 Rotational torque strength
The MDF shall resist rotational torque M5 specified in Table 1 and shall show no failure of any component
and the lever handles or knobs shall still be operational after the test.
Lever handles or knobs shall not deform permanently more than a distance δ4 according to Table 1 as
measured at the reference point after de-loaded the torque.
The test shall be done in accordance with 6.2.6.
4.2.7 Minimum lever or knob torque transfer
4.2.7.1 Minimum lever torque transfer
The MDF shall be able to transfer the torque specified in Table 1.
If a MDF is equipped with a lever on the outside and this MDF is protected by a mean to prevent damage
in case of excessive torque M6 is applied to the lever, the mean shall be able to transfer a minimum torque
as specified in Table 1.
Compliance is checked by the test methods given in 6.2.7.
4.2.7.2 Minimum knob torque transfer
The MDF shall be able to transfer the torque specified in Table 1.
If a MDF is equipped with a knob on the outside and this MDF is protected by a mean to prevent damage
in case of excessive torque being applied to the knob, the mean shall be able to transfer a minimum torque
as specified in Table 1.
Compliance is checked by the test methods given in 6.2.7.
4.2.8 Bump requirements
The MDF shall be able to withstand bumps as specified in Table 1.
The MDF may have temporary degradation or loss of function and/or data, but the MDF shall remain in
secured position. The loss of function and/or data shall be self-recoverable within 5 s after the bump test.
Compliance is checked by the test methods given in 6.2.8.
4.2.9 Vibration requirements
The MDF shall be able to withstand vibrations specified in Table 1.
The MDF may have temporary degradation or loss of function and/or data, but the MDF shall remain in
secured position. The loss of function and/or data shall be self-recoverable within 5 s after the vibration
test.
Compliance is checked by the test methods given in 6.2.9.
4.2.10 Electrostatic discharge requirements
The MDF shall be able to withstand high voltage and static electricity. It shall conform to the requirements
given in EN 61000-4-2 and conform to the specification in Table 1.
The MDF may have temporary degradation or loss of function and/or data, but the electric blocking of
the MDF shall remain in secured position. The loss of function and/or data shall be self-recoverable
within 5 s after the ESD test.
Compliance is checked by the test method given in 6.2.10.
4.2.11 Status indication
The MDF shall indicate the authorization of the credential according to Table 1 by a signal. It shall be a
clear statement in the product information which signals are used.
The function shall be tested according to 6.2.11.
Security indication stating the position of the actuator in coupled or uncoupled status is not a part of this
document. This function may be required by national specification.
4.2.12 Voltage drop protection
The MDF shall withstand dips and short interruptions of the supply voltage.
During the dips and short interruptions the locking mechanism and its operational parts shall maintain
its status or go into its uncoupled position.
The product shall continue to operate as declared after the dips and short interruptions. The voltage drop
protection shall be tested according to 6.2.12.
Table 1 — Category of use
Test Test
Clause Requirement Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Unit
method parameter
Axial strength of F 1 300 500 800 1 000 N
4.2.2 6.2.2
MDF and fixing δ1 ≤ 2 ≤ 2 ≤ 2 ≤ 2 mm
Requirement for
4.2.3 6.2.3 δ2 ≤ 10 ≤ 10 ≤ 6 ≤ 6 mm
free play
Free angular
4.2.4 movement or 6.2.4 δ3 ≤ 15 ≤ 15 ≤ 15 ≤ 15 mm
misalignment
Unsprung or spring assisted
handle
Torque of return
M1 ≤ 0,6 ≤ 0,6 ≤ 1,5 ≤ 1,5
4.2.5.1 mechanism Nm
6.2.5.1
Operating torque
spring assisted M2 ≤ 1,5 ≤ 1,5 ≤ 2,4 ≤ 2,4
handle
Unsprung knob
4.2.5.2 M3 ≤ 0,6 ≤ 0,6 ≤ 0,6 ≤ 0,6 Nm
Torque of return
6.2.5.2
mechanism
Spring loaded lever handles
or knobs
M4 ≤ 1,5 ≤ 1,5 ≤ 2,4 ≤ 2,4 Nm
Operating torque
4.2.5.3
Return to at-rest
φ ±4 ±2 ±1 ±1 o
position 6.2.5.3
Operating torque
M4 ≤ 1,5 ≤ 1,5 ≤ 1,5 ≤ 1,5 Nm
for thumb turn
Rotational
M5 20 30 40 60 Nm
torque strength
4.2.6 6.2.6
Deformation δ4 5 5 5 5 mm
Minimum lever
4.2.7.1 6.2.7 15 15 20 20 Nm
transmission
M6
Minimum knob
4.2.7.2 6.2.7 5 5 7,5 7,5 Nm
transmission
40 g
Bump
4.2.8 6.2.8 - -
(100 bumps / 3 directions)
requirements
duration per bump 6 ms
Frequency range: 10 Hz to 150 Hz
Displacement amplitude: 0,35 mm
Acceleration amplitude: 5 g
Vibration
Duration of endurance in sweep cycles for
4.2.9 requiremen 6.2.9 - -
each axis: 5
ts
Crossover frequency: 58 Hz to 62 Hz
Sweep rate: 1 octave per minute
Electrostatic Contact 8
4.2.10 discharge 6.2.10 Voltage kV
Air 15
requirements
4.2.11 Status indication 6.2.11 - NO YES YES YES -
Voltage drop
4.2.12 6.2.12 - YES YES YES YES -
protection
4.3 Durability requirements (2nd character)
4.3.1 Durability of handle and knob function
The MDF type A including the actuators shall be able to operate the minimum number of cycles that is
specified in Table 2 with no failure of any component and the lever handle, knob and the actuator shall
still be operational after the test.
The MDF type B shall be able to operate the minimum number of cycles that is specified in Table 2. With
no failure of any component and the lever handle and knob shall still be operational after the test.
NOTE The electrical operated actuator is tested according to the standard for electrically operated locks.
After the test, the “at-rest” position of spring-loaded door furniture when against its stops shall conform
to the value specified in Table 1. This requirement does not apply to spring assisted lever furniture.
Compliance is checked by the test method given in 6.3. Definition of forces L, P and R see Figure 5.
Table 2 — Durability
Test Test
Clause Requirement Grade 6 Grade 7 Unit
method parameter
Durability of handle and knob
100 000 200 000
function
Downwards force L 60 100 N
4.3.1 6.3.1
Outward force P 60 100 N
Return force R 12 20 N
4.4 Suitability for use in fire resistance and smoke control doors (4th character)
MDF suitable for smoke control and/or fire resistance doors shall conform to the following requirements
and shall be classified as follows:
Grade 0 NPD, No Performance determined
Grade A Suitable for use on smoke controlled doors
For grade A the MDF shall fulfil one of the following requirements:
— the material for the parts of the MDF which are responsible for preventing any leakage of smoke shall
have a melting point of not less than 300 °C;
— a smoke door set incorporating a representative mechatronic door furniture shall be subjected to a
smoke test in accordance with EN 1634-3.
Grade B Suitable for use on fire resistance and smoke controlled doors
For grade B a MDF representative of their type shall have been subjected to a successful fire test, in
accordance with EN 1634-1 or EN 1634-2, to prove the effect of the product on the fire resistance of the
complete door assembly. It is not necessary for the MDF to be operable after such a fire test.
MDF that are designed for use with battery shall be tested with the battery recommended in the product
information.
It is not necessary for the MDF to operate after the fire test.
Verified in 6.4.
#National regulations can apply, in addition to the above.$
4.5 Safety (5th character)
4.5.1 General
This requirement is not related to emergency exit device EN 179 or panic devices EN 1125.
4.5.2 Axial strength for safety furniture
The MDF in grade 1 and 2 shall resist an axial force F4 indicated in Table 3 without breaking any
component.
There shall be no failure of any component and the furniture shall remain fixed to the test block. The lever
handle or knob need not be operational after completion of the test.
Compliance is checked by the test methods given in 6.5.1.
It is recommended that only furniture conforming to this requirement should be used in situations where
there is a high risk of falling, such as for doors at the top of cellar steps or other types of staircases.
Table 3 — Safety
grade
Test Test
Clause Requirement Unit
method parameter
0 1 2
Axial strength for safety
4.5.2 6.5.1 F4 NA 1,5 2,5 kN
furniture
4.6 Environmental resistance (6th character)
4.6.1 Corrosion resistance requirements
Corrosion resistance is applicable for environmental resistance grades 2, 3 and 4 (see Table 4).
The MDF shall operate, using a maximum torque on the handle or knob of not higher than the grade for
category of use after have been exposed to EN 1670.
MDF grade 2 shall comply with EN 1670 grade 1. MDF grade 3 shall comply with EN 1670 grade 2. MDF
grade 4 shall comply with EN 1670 grade 3.
After the exposure all surfaces of the MDF which are visible when fitted in service shall conform to the
acceptance criteria defined in EN 1670 according to chosen grade.
Unless otherwise specified, testing refers to both inside and outside of the MDF.
Compliance is checked by the test method 6.6.1.
4.6.2 Resistance of MDF against water
The MDF shall have protection against water as specified in Table 4 and shall be able to function correctly
after being exposed to water.
The water protection is checked by test method 6.6.2.
4.6.3 Dry heat
The MDF shall be able to function correctly at different temperatures. It shall also be able to function
correctly after being exposed to thermal shocks. See Table 4 for environmental resistance mechatronic
door furniture.
Compliance is checked by the test methods of 6.6.3.
4.6.4 Cold
The MDF shall be able to function correctly at different low temperatures. It shall also be able to function
correctly after being exposed to thermal shocks. See Table 4 for environmental resistance mechatronic
door furniture.
Compliance is checked by the test methods of 6.6.4.
4.6.5 Damp heat cyclic
The MDF shall be able to function correctly in an environment of high relative humidity. See Table 4 for
environmental resistance mechatronic door furniture.
Compliance is checked by the test method of 6.6.5.
Table 4 — Environmental resistance MDF
Grade
Test
Clause Requirement Unit
method
0 1 2 3 4
4.6.1 Corrosion resistance 6.6.1 - - 24 48 96 h
Protection of mechatronic
4.6.2 6.6.2 - - Yes Yes Yes -
door furniture against water
+55 +55 +55 +65 °C
4.6.3 Dry heat 6.6.3 -
16 16 16 16 h
+5 +5 −10 −25 °C
4.6.4 Cold 6.6.4 -
16 16 16 16 h
4.6.5 Damp heat (cyclic) 6.6.5 - - - - +55 °C
4.7 Credential related security (7th character)
4.7.1 General
The MDF and its credentials for grade A to D shall have security against code manipulations, brute force
attacks, credential copying, code spying and code guessing regardless of the technique used.
The requirements for the credential related security vary with the different credential techniques used
for the MDF. Table 5 shows the requirements for RFID (radio frequency identification, active or passive),
PIN code, magnetic stripe and biometric techniques.
If the method of obtaining access to the MDF does not fall into any of these categories, the credential
related security grade shall be declared by analogy to the best comparable technique.
In the case where the MDF may be authorized by two of the techniques the grade for credential related
security depends on whether both techniques may be used alternatively to gain access or both techniques
are always used together to gain access. In the first case, the grade is the lower one of the grades of the
individual techniques, in the latter case the grade is one grade higher than the highest grade of the
individual technique, but not higher than the highest possible grade D.
Verified according to 6.7.
Table 5 — Credential related security
Technique Requirements 0 A B C D
code variations / max
NPD 10 000 1 000 000 1 000 000 10 000 000
number of auth. codes
!communication
!communication
encrypted with
no encrypted with AES
encryption NPD no requirement 3DES
requirement session keys,
session keys,
ICC
unique key"
unique key"
!3x56 bits
no no
encryption key length NPD !128 bits"
requirement requirement
K1=K3 allowed"
no no
copy protection NPD yes yes
requirement requirement
code variations / max
NPD 1 000 10 000 - -
number of auth. codes
dead time
dead time
after failed
Additional security after
NPD attempt and - -
features failed
protected
attempt
visibility
PIN code
T = the maximum number
of codes of the unit
divided by the read speed
(the number of possible NPD T = 6 h T = 24 h - -
codes per hour), divided
by the number of possible
users and divided by 2.
code variations / max
NPD 10 000 1 000 000 - -
number of auth. codes
no no
copy protection NPD - -
requirement requirement
T = the maximum number
Access Card
of codes of the unit
divided by the read speed
(the number of possible NPD T = 6 h T = 24 h - -
codes per hour), divided
by the number of possible
users and divided by 2.
−1
FAR / max. number of
NPD 100 1 000 10 000 -
auth. templates
Biometrics
Additional security no alive
NPD alive detection -
features requirement detection
NOTE  Grade D is not achievable for pure PIN code, access card or biometric systems.
4.7.2 ICC
4.7.2.1 Effective code variations
The effective code variations are all code variations possible by design divided by the maximum possible
number of authorized codes on one MDF. It shall be at least the number according to Table 5.
NOTE 1 In the case where the unique ID of the RFID is used, this corresponds to the possible variations of the
unique ID divided by the maximum possible number of authorized credentials.
NOTE 2 Examples are given in Annex E.
4.7.2.2 Encryption
In grade C, the data on the RFID or the communication between RFID and MDF shall be encrypted by any
encryption algorithm. The length of the encryption key shall be at least 48 bits long.
In grade D, the communication between the RFID and the MDF shall be encrypted by the AES or 3DES
(TDEA) encryption method according to ISO/IEC 18033-3.
The encryption key shall be at least 128 bits long. For each communication attempt (session) a new
session key shall be created and used for the communication. Session keys and encryption keys shall
never be broadcasted (challenge response technique). The encryption key shall be unique for each system
installation of MDFs or, alternatively, shall be user configurable.
4.7.2.3 Copy protection
In grades C and D the credential shall be copy protected. It shall not be possible to copy an authorized
credential using standard third-party equipment.
4.7.3 PIN Code
4.7.3.1 Effective code variations
The effective code variations are the possible code variations divided
...