ASTM F3020-20
(Specification)Standard Performance Specifications and Test Methods for Hand-Worn Metal Detectors Used in Safety and Security
Standard Performance Specifications and Test Methods for Hand-Worn Metal Detectors Used in Safety and Security
SCOPE
1.1 This standard applies to all hand-worn or glove-type metal detectors used to find metal contraband concealed or hidden on people or other objects with hand-accessible surfaces. Hand-worn metal detectors (HWMDs) are significantly different in design compared to the more common hand-held metal detector (HHMD). For example, the HWMD generates a much more localized magnetic field than does the HHMD and the useful field of the HWMD is normal to the plane of the hand whereas the useful field of the HHMD is multi-directional.
1.2 This standard describes baseline-performance requirements, which includes metal object detection performance, safety (electrical, mechanical, fire), electromagnetic compatibility, environmental conditions and ranges, and mechanical durability. The requirements for metal detection performance are unique and, therefore, test methods for these parameters are provided, including the design of test objects. An agency or organization using this standard is encouraged to add their unique operationally-based requirements to those requirements listed in this baseline-performance standard.
1.3 This documentary standard describes the use of spherical test objects, instead of actual threat objects or exemplars of threat objects, to test the detection performance of hand-worn metal detectors. Spherical test objects are used because the detectability of spherical test objects is not orientation dependent, whereas this is not true for non-spherical test objects. This orientation-dependent detectability of non-spherical test objects may allow a HWMD to be incorrectly attributed a higher performance capability than that HWMD is capable of providing. To aid agencies wishing to add specific threat objects to their detection performance requirements, included in Appendix X1 is the analysis of the probability of detection for different orientations of agency-specific non-spherical threat objects.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 30-Nov-2020
- Technical Committee
- F12 - Security Systems and Equipment
- Drafting Committee
- F12.60 - Controlled Access Security, Search, and Screening Equipment
Relations
- Effective Date
- 01-Aug-2019
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2019
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2018
Overview
ASTM F3020-20: Standard Performance Specifications and Test Methods for Hand-Worn Metal Detectors Used in Safety and Security is a comprehensive international standard developed by ASTM International. It covers the essential performance, safety, and testing requirements for hand-worn or glove-type metal detectors (HWMDs) used to locate concealed metal contraband on people or objects with hand-accessible surfaces. Distinct from the more common hand-held metal detectors (HHMD), HWMDs are uniquely designed to generate a highly localized magnetic field that is normal to the surface of the hand, providing increased precision for targeted searches.
Key Topics
- Scope and Application: Applies to all glove-type and hand-worn metal detectors used for contraband detection in security and safety contexts.
- Baseline Performance: Establishes minimum standards for detection capability, safety (electrical, thermal, fire), electromagnetic compatibility, environmental durability, and mechanical resilience.
- Testing Methods: Specifies robust and objective test methods, including the use of spherical test objects to ensure orientation-independent detection accuracy.
- Detection Classes: Detection performance is classified by object size (large, medium, small, very small), simulating various threat levels, from handguns to razor blades.
- User Guidance: Encourages agencies and organizations to supplement baseline requirements with operationally-specific needs.
- Safety Considerations: Addresses human exposure to electromagnetic fields, battery life, and audible, visual, or vibratory alarms.
Applications
ASTM F3020-20 is vital for organizations requiring reliable and verifiable performance in the detection of concealed metallic contraband. Key application areas include:
- Aviation Security: For passenger screening and baggage inspection.
- Correctional Facilities: Enhanced body searches to prevent the smuggling of weapons or contraband.
- Event Security: Rapid and targeted screening of attendees at high-profile events.
- Public Safety: Law enforcement personnel benefit from increased detection accuracy in areas where precise, localized scanning is necessary.
- Critical Infrastructure: Protection of key sites such as power plants, government buildings, and transportation hubs.
The use of HWMDs, aligned with ASTM F3020-20, ensures that devices deliver consistent performance, minimize false alarms, and operate safely under a variety of environmental conditions.
Related Standards
ASTM F3020-20 references and aligns with several key international standards to ensure comprehensive coverage of quality, testing, and safety:
- ASTM F3356: Practice for Conformity Assessment of Metal Detectors Used in Safety and Security.
- ISO 17025: Competence of testing and calibration laboratories.
- IEC 61010-1: Safety requirements for electrical equipment.
- IEC 60529: Degrees of protection provided by enclosures (IP Code).
- MIL-STD-810G: Environmental engineering and laboratory tests.
- CISPR 22: Radiated disturbance standards for information technology equipment.
- IEEE C95 Series: Safety levels for human exposure to electromagnetic fields.
By referencing these standards, ASTM F3020-20 assures stakeholders that HWMDs designed and tested under its specifications will integrate seamlessly with broader regulatory and organizational safety requirements.
Conclusion
Implementing ASTM F3020-20 ensures hand-worn metal detectors deliver reliable, accurate, and safe performance for a wide range of security and safety applications. By following these standard performance specifications and employing the detailed test methods outlined, organizations can confidently select and deploy devices suitable for modern security challenges, minimize false positives, and meet stringent operational demands.
Buy Documents
ASTM F3020-20 - Standard Performance Specifications and Test Methods for Hand-Worn Metal Detectors Used in Safety and Security
REDLINE ASTM F3020-20 - Standard Performance Specifications and Test Methods for Hand-Worn Metal Detectors Used in Safety and Security
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

NSF International
Global independent organization facilitating standards development and certification.
CIS Institut d.o.o.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) certification body. Notified Body NB-2890 for EU Regulation 2016/425 PPE.

Kiwa BDA Testing
Building and construction product certification.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM F3020-20 is a technical specification published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Performance Specifications and Test Methods for Hand-Worn Metal Detectors Used in Safety and Security". This standard covers: SCOPE 1.1 This standard applies to all hand-worn or glove-type metal detectors used to find metal contraband concealed or hidden on people or other objects with hand-accessible surfaces. Hand-worn metal detectors (HWMDs) are significantly different in design compared to the more common hand-held metal detector (HHMD). For example, the HWMD generates a much more localized magnetic field than does the HHMD and the useful field of the HWMD is normal to the plane of the hand whereas the useful field of the HHMD is multi-directional. 1.2 This standard describes baseline-performance requirements, which includes metal object detection performance, safety (electrical, mechanical, fire), electromagnetic compatibility, environmental conditions and ranges, and mechanical durability. The requirements for metal detection performance are unique and, therefore, test methods for these parameters are provided, including the design of test objects. An agency or organization using this standard is encouraged to add their unique operationally-based requirements to those requirements listed in this baseline-performance standard. 1.3 This documentary standard describes the use of spherical test objects, instead of actual threat objects or exemplars of threat objects, to test the detection performance of hand-worn metal detectors. Spherical test objects are used because the detectability of spherical test objects is not orientation dependent, whereas this is not true for non-spherical test objects. This orientation-dependent detectability of non-spherical test objects may allow a HWMD to be incorrectly attributed a higher performance capability than that HWMD is capable of providing. To aid agencies wishing to add specific threat objects to their detection performance requirements, included in Appendix X1 is the analysis of the probability of detection for different orientations of agency-specific non-spherical threat objects. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
SCOPE 1.1 This standard applies to all hand-worn or glove-type metal detectors used to find metal contraband concealed or hidden on people or other objects with hand-accessible surfaces. Hand-worn metal detectors (HWMDs) are significantly different in design compared to the more common hand-held metal detector (HHMD). For example, the HWMD generates a much more localized magnetic field than does the HHMD and the useful field of the HWMD is normal to the plane of the hand whereas the useful field of the HHMD is multi-directional. 1.2 This standard describes baseline-performance requirements, which includes metal object detection performance, safety (electrical, mechanical, fire), electromagnetic compatibility, environmental conditions and ranges, and mechanical durability. The requirements for metal detection performance are unique and, therefore, test methods for these parameters are provided, including the design of test objects. An agency or organization using this standard is encouraged to add their unique operationally-based requirements to those requirements listed in this baseline-performance standard. 1.3 This documentary standard describes the use of spherical test objects, instead of actual threat objects or exemplars of threat objects, to test the detection performance of hand-worn metal detectors. Spherical test objects are used because the detectability of spherical test objects is not orientation dependent, whereas this is not true for non-spherical test objects. This orientation-dependent detectability of non-spherical test objects may allow a HWMD to be incorrectly attributed a higher performance capability than that HWMD is capable of providing. To aid agencies wishing to add specific threat objects to their detection performance requirements, included in Appendix X1 is the analysis of the probability of detection for different orientations of agency-specific non-spherical threat objects. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ASTM F3020-20 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 13.320 - Alarm and warning systems. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM F3020-20 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM F3356-19a, ASTM F3356-19, ASTM F3356-18. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM F3020-20 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation:F3020 −20
Standard Performance Specifications and Test Methods for
Hand-Worn Metal Detectors Used in Safety and Security
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F3020; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
1.1 This standard applies to all hand-worn or glove-type
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
metal detectors used to find metal contraband concealed or
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
hidden on people or other objects with hand-accessible sur-
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
faces. Hand-worn metal detectors (HWMDs) are significantly
1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-
different in design compared to the more common hand-held
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
metaldetector(HHMD).Forexample,theHWMDgeneratesa
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
much more localized magnetic field than does the HHMD and
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
the useful field of the HWMD is normal to the plane of the
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
hand whereas the useful field of the HHMD is multi-
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
directional.
2. Referenced Documents
1.2 This standard describes baseline-performance
requirements, which includes metal object detection
2.1 ASTM Standards:
performance, safety (electrical, mechanical, fire), electromag-
F3356Practice for Conformity Assessment of Metal Detec-
netic compatibility, environmental conditions and ranges, and
tors Used in Safety and Security
mechanical durability. The requirements for metal detection
2.2 ISO Standards:
performance are unique and, therefore, test methods for these
ISO 17025:2005General Requirements for the Competence
parameters are provided, including the design of test objects.
of Testing and Calibration Laboratories
Anagencyororganizationusingthisstandardisencouragedto
ISO 10012:2003Quality Assurance Requirements for Mea-
add their unique operationally-based requirements to those
suring Equipment
requirements listed in this baseline-performance standard.
ISO 14117:2012Active Implantable Medical Devices—
Electromagnetic Compatibility—EMC Test Protocols for
1.3 This documentary standard describes the use of spheri-
Implantable Cardiac Pacemakers, Implantable Cardio-
cal test objects, instead of actual threat objects or exemplars of
verter Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization De-
threat objects, to test the detection performance of hand-worn
vices
metal detectors. Spherical test objects are used because the
ISO 14708–1:2000Implants for Surgery—Active Implant-
detectability of spherical test objects is not orientation
able Medical Devices—Part 1: General Requirements for
dependent, whereas this is not true for non-spherical test
Safety, Marking, and for Information to be Provided by
objects. This orientation-dependent detectability of non-
the Manufacturer
spherical test objects may allow a HWMD to be incorrectly
ISO 14708–2:2012Implants for Surgery—Active Implant-
attributed a higher performance capability than that HWMD is
able Medical Devices—Part 2: Cardiac Pacemakers
capable of providing. To aid agencies wishing to add specific
ISO 14708–3:2017Implants for Surgery—Active Implant-
threat objects to their detection performance requirements,
able Medical Devices—Part 3: Implantable Devices
included in Appendix X1 is the analysis of the probability of
ISO 14708–4:2008Implants for Surgery—Active Implant-
detection for different orientations of agency-specific non-
able Medical Devices—Part 4: Implantable Infusion
spherical threat objects.
Pumps
1 2
This performance specification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
F12 on Security Systems and Equipment and is the direct responsibility of contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Subcommittee F12.60 on Controlled Access Security, Search, and Screening Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
Equipment. the ASTM website.
Current edition approved Dec. 1, 2020. Published December 2020. Originally Available from International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO
approved in 2016. Last previous edition approved in 2019 as F3020–19a. DOI: Central Secretariat, BIBC II, Chemin de Blandonnet 8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier,
10.1520/F3020-20. Geneva, Switzerland, http://www.iso.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
F3020−20
ISO 14708–5:2010Implants for Surgery—Active Implant- 3.1.2 detector—thehand-wornmetaldetector(HWMD)that
able Medical Devices—Part 5: Circulatory Support De- is worn on the hand and is used for finding metal objects
vices concealed on a person or other object (see Figs. 1 and 2).
ISO 14708–6:2010Implants for Surgery—Active Implant-
3.1.3 detector axis—an imaginary line passing through and
able Medical Devices—Part 6: Particular Requirements
perpendiculartothedetectorplanesuchthatthemagneticfield
forActive Implantable Medical Devices Intended toTreat
around the detector axis has the maximum symmetry; the
Tachyarrhythmia (Including Implantable Defibrillators)
detector axis is labeled as the “z” axis; the location of the
ISO 14708–7:2013Implants for Surgery—Active Implant-
detector axis relative to the HWMD shape and geometry is
able Medical Devices–Part 7: Particular Requirements
specifiedbythemanufacturer;thedetectoraxisisthereference
for Cochlear Implant Systems
for positioning in the detection performance tests (see Fig. 1).
2.3 IEC Standards:
3.1.4 detector holder—a rectangular prism made of the
IEC 60529 2001–2Degrees of Protection Provided by En-
body simulant on which the HWMD is worn.
closures (IP Code)
5 3.1.5 detector plane—an imaginary plane (two-dimensional
2.4 IEEE Standards:
surface) that contains the plane, line, or point on the HWMD
IEEE C95.1Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to
surfacethatisclosesttotheobjectbeingscannedundertypical
Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic
HWMD use and is perpendicular to the detector axis; the
Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz
detector plane contains two orthogonal axes labeled as the “x”
IEEE C95.6Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to
axis and as the “y” axis (see Fig. 2).
Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, 0–3 kHz
3.1.6 detectionsensitivitysetting—anadjustmentthatcanbe
2.5 Military Standards:
made to the HWMD that affects its ability to sense metal
MIL-STD-810G Method 501.5Test Method Standard for
objects.
Environmental Engineering Considerations and Labora-
tory Tests, Method 501.5, High Temperature
3.1.7 measurement coordinate system—a mutually orthogo-
MIL-STD-810G Method 502.5Test Method Standard for
nal three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system referenced
Environmental Engineering Considerations and Labora-
to the detector axis and the detector plane; the three axes are
tory Tests, Method 502.5, Low Temperature
labeled “x,” “y,” and “z,” where the z-axis is parallel to the
detector axis and the x-axis and the y-axis are in the detector
3. Terminology
plane (see Fig. 2).
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.8 measurement plane—an imaginary two-dimensional
3.1.1 alarm—an indication that informs the operator of an
surface that is parallel to the detector plane and that is
event, such as metal detection or a detector (HWMD) status
tangential to the plane, line, or point on the test object that is
change.
closest to the detector plane; there may be more than one
measurement plane; the measurement plane(s) is (are) refer-
enced from the detector plane (see Fig. 2); there is a measure-
ment plane for each object-size class of the HWMD, as shown
Available from International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), 3, rue de
in Table 1.
Varembé, P.O. Box 131, 1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland, http://www.iec.ch.
Available from Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE),
3.1.9 size class—a classification method based on grouping
445 Hoes Ln., Piscataway, NJ 08854-4141, http://www.ieee.org.
exemplarsofcommonlyencounteredobjectsthatmaybeeither
Available from U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of
commercially available or readily fabricated from available
Documents, 732 N. Capitol St., NW, Washington, DC 20401-0001, http://
www.access.gpo.gov.
FIG. 1Diagram of Hand-Worn Metal Detector Showing the Detector Plane (outlined in red) and the Detector Axis (labeled z)
F3020−20
NOTE 1—The x-axis points along the user’s arm.
FIG. 2Diagram of the Measurement Coordinate System Showing the Measurement Coordinate System Axes, One Measurement Plane,
and the Detector Plane
TABLE 1 Distance Between Measurement Plane and Detector
3.1.10 test object—an item that is used to test the HWMD
Plane for the Different HWMD Size Classes
detection performance; test objects accurately simulate the
Size Class Distance Between Measurement Plane and Detector
electromagnetic properties of an actual threat or contraband
Plane (cm)
item, such as a weapon or an item that can be used to defeat
Large 1.5 -0/+0.25
Medium 1.0 -0/+0.25 security devices; the test objects are described in Section 6.
Small 1.0 -0/+0.25
3.1.11 test object axis—the imaginary line passing through
Very Small 0.5 -0/+0.25
the center of the test object that is referenced to and has a
one-to-one correspondence with the axes of the measurement
materials and that are related to customer applications and coordinate system.
object sizes; a HWMD may meet the requirements for one or
3.1.12 x-axis scan range and y-axis scan range—the seg-
all size classes, as defined below. For each size class, there are
ment of line along the x and y axis of the measurement
exemplars constructed of ferromagnetic metal and exemplars
coordinate system that is centered on the detector axis and that
constructed of nonferromagnetic metal.
extendsequallyoneithersideofthedetectoraxis;thedetection
3.1.9.1 large—representsthreatitemssuchashandguns;and performance of the HWMD will be tested along both axes (see
similarly sized objects, or larger.
Table 2).
3.1.9.2 medium—represents threat items such as knives
having blade lengths exceeding 7.5 cm, and similarly sized
TABLE 2 X-axis and Y-axis Scan Ranges for the Different HWMD
objects, up to the size of a large object.
Size Classes
3.1.9.3 small—represents threat items such as, but not
Size Class X-axis and Y-axis Scan Ranges
limited to, knives having blade lengths less than or equal to
lower limit (cm) upper limit (cm)
7.5cm, handcuff keys, handgun rounds, and similarly sized
Large -3.0 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.1
Medium -1.5 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.1
objects, up to the size of a medium object.
Small -1.0 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1
3.1.9.4 very small—represents threat items such as t razor
Very Small -1.0 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1
blades, hypodermic needles and similarly sized objects, up to
the size of a small object.
F3020−20
4. Requirements for Acceptance 4.4 Detection Performance Specifications—The ability of
NOTE 1—The HWMD shall meet or exceed the requirements and theHWMDtosensethepresenceofatestobjectwillvarywith
specifications stated in this section. However, it is only to that HWMD
the material, type, and orientation of the test object.
unit under test and at the time of test that a pass/fail assignment can be
Consequently, the test objects are grouped according to their
made with confidence.
size class and the HWMDs are tested for their ability to detect
NOTE 2—To have confidence that the HWMD unit under test will
test objects from within these different size classes. The
pass/fail at times other than the time of the initial test or that other units
of the same model will pass/fail requires model evaluation based on a detection performance specifications shall be tested using the
product conformity assessment program, such as that described in
detection sensitivity setting, if applicable, that is specified by
Specification F3356 for ConformityAssessment of Metal Detectors Used
the manufacturer to be appropriate for each test object size
in Safety and Security.
class. All the tests of 4.4 requirements shall be performed
NOTE 3—Recommended test report forms are given in Appendix X5.
within an 8 h 6 0.5 h period without adjusting the detector
4.1 General Test Conditions and Requirements:
sensitivity setting between tests. The detector sensitivity set-
4.1.1 Testing and Calibration Laboratories—Laboratories
tingshallnotbereadjustedduringtesting,orafterchangingthe
performing testing and calibration of the HWMD or its
battery. The test objects are given in Section 6.
components, or both, shall meet the requirements of ISO
4.4.1 Detection Sensitivity—The HWMD shall exhibit an
17025, as amended.
averageprobabilityofdetection,p ,≥0.95withanaverage
d, sens
4.1.2 Measurement Equipment and Processes—All mea-
confidence level of 0.95 for the test objects in each size class,
surement equipment and processes shall be certified to ISO
when each object in the size class is positioned in the
10012–1, as amended
appropriate measurement plane (see Table 1) and moving over
the appropriate x-axis scan range and y-axis scan range (see
4.2 Safety Specifications and Requirements:
Table 2) at a speed of 0.5m⁄s 6 0.05m⁄s and tested in
4.2.1 Magnetic Field Exposure—Themagnitudeoftheelec-
accordance with 5.2.2. This requirement is met when
tromagnetic field generated by the HWMD shall be less than
p ≥ p as computed per 5.2.2.
LB d, sens
theexposurelimitsspecifiedforgeneralpublicexposureinthe
7,8
4.4.2 Detection Speed—The HWMD shall exhibit an aver-
ICNIRP guidelines(seeAppendixX4).Thesemeasurements
age probability of detection p , ≥ 0.95 with an average
d, sp-sens
shallbemadeatpointsongridlinesthatarei)tangentialtothe
confidence level of 0.95 for the test objects in each size class,
current-carrying coil of the HWMD and ii) parallel to the
when each object in the size class is positioned in the
surfaces of an outward projection from the smallest imaginary
appropriate measurement plane (see Table 1) and moving over
rectangular prism enclosing that part of the HWMD encasing
the appropriate x-axis scan range (see Table 2) at a speed of
thecurrent-carryingcoils.Theseparation, s ,betweenpoints
grid
0.2m⁄s 6 0.01m⁄s, 0.5m⁄s 6 0.01m⁄s, and 1.0m⁄s 6
on these grid lines shall be 5 mm 6 1 mm and between any
0.01m⁄sastestedinaccordancewith5.2.3underthefollowing
paralleltangentiallinesshallbe5mm 61mm.Theseparation
conditions: (1) The delay between subsequent tests of a given
between the outward-projected surface and the smallest imagi-
test object shall be no more than 5 s 6 0.5 s; and (2) The
nary rectangular prism shall be 5 mm 6 1 mm. A three-axis
detectorsensitivitysettingshallnotbereadjustedbetweentests
magnetic field probe with a -3dB analog bandwidth of 0.1 f ≤
c
of a given test object or between tests of the test objects of a
f ≤ 10 f , where f is the nominal center frequency of the
c c c
given size class.
generated magnetic field, shall be used for measuring the
Thisrequirementismetwhen p ≥ p ascomputed
LB, sp d,sp-sens
magnetic field, and the size of its active elements shall be
per 5.2.3.
within a volume no larger than 2s ×2s ×2s .Ifthe
grid grid grid
HWMD has not been demonstrated to meet this requirement,
4.5 Environmental Ranges and Conditions—TheHWMDor
the manufacturer shall provide a warning with the HWMD
all of its components and their interconnections shall meet all
instructions that states “This device has not been demonstrated
of the requirements listed in this section. The HWMD shall
asbeingsafeorunsafeforuseonpeoplewithactiveimplanted
exhibit no observable changes in the detection performance
or body-worn medical devices, or both.”
specificationgivenin4.4.1forthex-axisscanpositionof0cm.
The requirements given in this section shall be applied appro-
4.3 Power Requirement:
priately for either indoor or indoor/outdoor HWMD models.
4.3.1 Battery Life—The HWMD shall meet the detection
The tests for the requirements listed in this section shall be
performance specification given in 4.4 after operating for at
performed on the same unit.
least8has tested in accordance with 5.3 and while using a
4.5.1 Temperature Stability and Range:
battery of the type and model recommended by the manufac-
4.5.1.1 Indoor—TheHWMDshalloperateovertheambient
turer.
temperature range of at least 0°C to 46°C. The HWMD shall
betestedinaccordancewithMIL-STD-810GMethod501.5,as
amended, Procedure II, Steps 1 through 6, relative humidity
ICNIRP, “Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-varying Electric,
6% 63%,at46°C 63°C.TheHWMDthenshallbecooled
Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz),” International Commission
to 0°C 6 3°C within 4h 6 0.5h and tested in accordance
onNon-IonizingradiationProtection(ICNIRP),HealthPhysics,April1998,Volume
74, No. 4, pp. 494–522.
withMIL-STD-810GMethod502.5,asamended,ProcedureII,
ICNIRP, “Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-varying Electric,
Steps 1 through 7.
Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (1 Hz to 100 GHz),” International Commis-
4.5.1.2 Indoor/Outdoor—The HWMD shall operate over
sion on Non-Ionizing radiation Protection (ICNIRP), Health Physics, Volume 99,
No. 6, pp. 818–836, 2010. the ambient temperature range of at least -21°C to 65°C. The
F3020−20
HWMD shall be tested in accordance with MIL-STD-810G 5.2.2.1 Initial Procedures—Ensure that the alarm detector
Method 501.5, as amended, Procedure II, Steps 1 through 6, and positioning system are connected to the computer control-
relative humidity 6% 63%,at65°C 6 3°C. The HWMD ler. Turn on the alarm detector, computer controller, and
then shall be cooled to -21°C 6 3°C within 4h 6 0.5h and positioningsystemandverifyproperoperationofthemeasure-
tested in accordance with MIL-STD-810G, as amended, Pro- ment system. Ensure that the HWMD is securely attached to
cedure II, Steps 1 through 7. the detector holder and that the detector holder is fixed in
4.5.2 Ingress Protection: position and secured relative to the three-axis positioning
4.5.2.1 Indoor—The HWMD shall meet or exceed the system. Attach the test object to the positioning system. Turn
requirements for compliance with IEC 60529, as amended, on the HWMD and ensure that its output is functioning
classification IP20. properly by noting a change in the alarm output as a metal
4.5.2.2 Indoor/Outdoor—The HWMD shall meet or exceed object is brought near the HWMD. Ensure that the test object
the requirements for compliance with IEC 60529, as amended, does not hit any objects while in motion. There is a minimum
classification IP54. number of repeats of a given measurement that must be
performed to meet the performance requirements for a given
4.6 Alarm Requirements—At least one alarm type,
confidence interval. This minimum number of measurements,
vibratory, audible, or visual, shall be provided and any alarm
N , is given by:
T
provided shall meet the applicable requirement given in this
section. z p
α 0
N 5 ceil , (1)
H J
T
4.6.1 Vibratory Alarm—Thevibratoryalarmshallproducea 1 2 p
where p is equal to the probability of detection specified in
forceintherangeof0.5Nto2Ninafrequencyrangeof10Hz
4.4.2; z is the critical point of a standard normal distribu-
to 300Hz as measured in accordance with 5.4.2. α
tion and is fixed for a given confidence interval; and ceil{x}
is a function that returns the smallest integer value that is
5. Performance Testing Procedures
greater than x. The value of N includes the number of test
T
5.1 General Test Conditions:
objects of a given test object size class (which is two, one
each from a ferromagnetic test object and a nonferromag-
5.1.1 Test Location—Thedistancebetweenanymetalobject
netic test object) and the number of scans performed. For
otherthanatestobjectandtheclosestpartoftheHWMDshall
example, when p = 0.95 and the confidence level = 0.95,
be greater than 0.5 m.
N = 52.
T
5.1.2 Environment—At the time of the tests, the ambient
Determine the number, n , of y-axis scans to perform at
temperature shall be in the range specified in 4.6 for the
s, k
appropriate application (indoor or indoor/outdoor); the relative each x-axis position for a given test object and given the
number, n , of practicable x-axis positions, and the total
humidity shall be noncondensing.
x
5.1.3 Preparations—New batteries of the type listed in the number of required scans, n . The value of n is computed
T s, k
using:
operator’smanualshallbeinstalledatthebeginningofthetests
and as instructed in any test method. Any setup or calibration
n
T
n 5 max ,10 , (2)
H J
adjustments specified in the operator’s manual shall be per- s, k
n
x
formed if required.
where the function max{x,y} returns the maximum value of
x and y.
5.2 Detection Performance Tests—The detection perfor-
mance test methods described in this section are based on the
5.2.2.2 Performing the Measurement, x-axis Scan Range:
use of a computer-controlled three-axis positioning system to
(1)Setthecomputerprogramtoperformanx-yscaninthe
control the motion and displacement of the test object relative
specified measurement plane at the specified speed.The center
to the HWMD. Other means of controlling this motion and
for the y-axis scans shall be the detector axis and the scans
displacementareacceptableifthepositioningandspeedvalues
shall each be no less than 10cm 6 1cm long.
are within the tolerances specified in these test methods.
(2)Setthex-axispositiontothespecifiedlowerx-axisscan
If the HWMD can be adjusted to provide an alarm for more
range limit.
than one size class, the detection performance test shall be
(3)Scan the y-axis and record any alarm as the y-axis scan
performed for each size class.The detection performance shall
is being performed.
be evaluated by the test methods described in this section.The
(4)RepeatStep(3)n timestoperformatotalofn scans
s,k s,k
distinction in testing between the different size classes is the
for the current x-axis scan position.
difference in the test separation distance between the measure-
(5)Compute the probability of alarm, p where x
d,sens,obj x i
k, i
ment plane and the test objects.
is the x-axis scan position and i is the x-axis scan index, and
5.2.1 Measurement System—The measurement system shall
obj represents the test object of the given test object size class
k
contain the components necessary to perform the tests de-
with index k, using:
scribed herein.Adiagram of the measurement system showing
n
s,k
the electrical and mechanical connections between its compo-
P 5 A (3)
d, sens,k,i ( Pos2sens,k,i,j
n
j51
s,k
nents shall be provided.
where the index abbreviations: k = obj , and i = x are used
k i
5.2.1.1 Computer Controller—The computer controller
and A is an integer value representing the occur-
Pos-sens,k,i,j
shallhaveinstalledandoperationalallnecessaryhardwareand
rence of the alarm (0 for the nonalarm state and 1 for the
software for providing instrument control and data acquisition. alarm state) for each x-axis scan position.
5.2.2 Detection Sensitivity Test: (6)Increment the x-axis position by 0.5cm 6 0.1cm.
F3020−20
(7)Repeat Steps (3) through (5) until the x-axis position is (9)Upon completion of Step (8), compute the average
at the specified upper x-axis scan range limit and record the probability of detection along the y axis, p , using:
d,sens,y
axis
number of alarms at each x, and N is the number of x-axis
K N
i x y
p 5 p . (8)
positions scanned.
d,sens,y ( ( d,sens,k,i
axis
KN
k51i51
y
(8)Repeat Step (7) for each of the remaining K-1 test
(10)Compute the average lower bound, p ,of p
LB,y d,sens,
axis
object of a given size class, where K is the number of test
y using:
axis
objects in a given size class. K = 2 as there is one nonferro-
K N
x
magnetic test object and one ferromagnetic test object for each
p 2 l
Œ ~ !
d,sens,k,i k,i
( (
size class.
k51i5i
p 5 p 2 , (9)
LB,y d,sens,y
axis axis
(9)Upon completion of Step (8), compute the average KN
y
where:
probability of detection along the x axis, p , using:
d,sens,x
axis
K N
x
z
α
p 5 p (4)
p ~1 2 p !1
d,sens,x (( d,sens,k.i
axis 2 k,i k,i
KN
k51i51 z 4n
x
α k,i
p 10.5 2 z
!
k,i α
(10)Compute the average lower bound, p ,of
n n
LB,x
axis k,i k,i
l 5 , (10)
k,i 2
p using:
z
d,sens,x
α
axis
n
K N k,i
x
where for these tests n = n as computed in 5.2.2.1. For a
k,i s,k
Œ ~P 2 l !
( ( d,sens,k,i k,i
k51i51
95% confidence interval, z = 1.645, and for a 99% confi-
a
p 5 P 2 (5)
LB,x d,sens,x
axis axis
KN
dence interval, z = 2.326.
x a
where:
5.2.2.4 Computing the Average Probability of Detection—
z
α
Compute the average probability, p , of detection using:
d
p 1 2 p 1
~ !
2 k,i k,i
z 4n
α k,i
p 10.5 2 z p 1p
!
k,i α LB,x LB,y
axis axis
n n
k,i k,i
p 5 , (11)
d
l 5 (6)
k,i 2
z
α
11 and record and report this value.
n
k,i
where for these tests n = n as computed in 5.2.2.1. For a
k,i s,k
5.2.3 Detection Speed Test:
95% confidence interval, z = 1.645, and for a 99% confi-
a
5.2.3.1 Initial Procedures:
dence interval, z = 2.326.
a
(1)Ensure that the alarm detector and positioning system
5.2.2.3 Performing the Measurement, y-axis Scan Range:
are connected to the computer controller. Turn on the alarm
(1)Setthecomputerprogramtoperformanx-yscaninthe
detector, computer controller, and positioning system and
specified measurement plane at the specified speed.The center
verify proper operation of the measurement system. Ensure
for the x-axis scans shall be the detector axis and the scans
that the HWMD is securely attached to the detector holder and
shall each be no less than 10cm 6 1cm long.
thatthedetectorholderisfixedinpositionandsecuredrelative
(2)Setthey-axispositiontothespecifiedlowery-axisscan
to the three-axis positioning system. Attach the test object to
range limit.
thepositioningsystem.TurnontheHWMDandensurethatits
(3)Scan the x axis and record any alarm as th
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: F3020 − 19a F3020 − 20
Standard Performance Specifications and Test Methods for
Hand-Worn Metal Detectors Used in Safety and Security
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F3020; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This standard applies to all hand-worn or glove-type metal detectors used to find metal contraband concealed or hidden on
people or other objects with hand-accessible surfaces. Hand-worn metal detectors (HWMDs) are significantly different in design
compared to the more common hand-held metal detector (HHMD). For example, the HWMD generates a much more localized
magnetic field than does the HHMD and the useful field of the HWMD is normal to the plane of the hand whereas the useful field
of the HHMD is multi-directional.
1.2 This standard describes baseline-performance requirements, which includes metal object detection performance, safety
(electrical, mechanical, fire), electromagnetic compatibility, environmental conditions and ranges, and mechanical durability. The
requirements for metal detection performance are unique and, therefore, test methods for these parameters are provided, including
the design of test objects. An agency or organization using this standard is encouraged to add their unique operationally-based
requirements to those requirements listed in this baseline-performance standard.
1.3 This documentary standard describes the use of spherical test objects, instead of actual threat objects or exemplars of threat
objects, to test the detection performance of hand-worn metal detectors. Spherical test objects are used because the detectability
of spherical test objects is not orientation dependent, whereas this is not true for non-spherical test objects. This orientation-
dependent detectability of non-spherical test objects may allow a HWMD to be incorrectly attributed a higher performance
capability than that HWMD is capable of providing. To aid agencies wishing to add specific threat objects to their detection
performance requirements, included in Appendix X1 is the analysis of the probability of detection for different orientations of
agency-specific non-spherical threat objects.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
F3356 Practice for Conformity Assessment of Metal Detectors Used in Safety and Security
This performance specification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F12 on Security Systems and Equipment and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
F12.60 on Controlled Access Security, Search, and Screening Equipment.
Current edition approved Aug. 1, 2019Dec. 1, 2020. Published September 2019December 2020. Originally approved in 2016. Last previous edition approved in 2019 as
F3020 – 19.F3020 – 19a. DOI: 10.1520/F3020-19A.10.1520/F3020-20.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
F3020 − 20
2.2 ISO Standards:
ISO 17025:2005 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories
ISO 10012:2003 Quality Assurance Requirements for Measuring Equipment
ISO 14117:2012 Active Implantable Medical Devices—Electromagnetic Compatibility—EMC Test Protocols for Implantable
Cardiac Pacemakers, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Devices
ISO 14708–1:2000 Implants for Surgery—Active Implantable Medical Devices—Part 1: General Requirements for Safety,
Marking, and for Information to be Provided by the Manufacturer
ISO 14708–2:2012 Implants for Surgery—Active Implantable Medical Devices—Part 2: Cardiac Pacemakers
ISO 14708–3:2017 Implants for Surgery—Active Implantable Medical Devices—Part 3: Implantable Devices
ISO 14708–4:2008 Implants for Surgery—Active Implantable Medical Devices—Part 4: Implantable Infusion Pumps
ISO 14708–5:2010 Implants for Surgery—Active Implantable Medical Devices—Part 5: Circulatory Support Devices
ISO 14708–6:2010 Implants for Surgery—Active Implantable Medical Devices—Part 6: Particular Requirements for Active
Implantable Medical Devices Intended to Treat Tachyarrhythmia (Including Implantable Defibrillators)
ISO 14708–7:2013 Implants for Surgery—Active Implantable Medical Devices – Part 7: Particular Requirements for Cochlear
Implant Systems
2.3 IEC Standards:
IEC 61010–1 Safety Requirements for Electrical Equipment for Measurement, Control, and Laboratory Use—Part 1: General
Requirements
IEC 61000–6–1 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Part 6: Generic Standards—Sections 1: Immunity for Residential,
Commercial, and Light-Industrial Environments
IEC 61000–4–2 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Part 4: Testing and Measurement Techniques—Section 2: Electrostatics
Discharge Immunity Test
IEC 61000–4–3 Electromagnetnic Compatibility (EMC), Part 4: Testing and Measurement Techniques—Section 3: Radiated,
Radiofrequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test
IEC 61000–4–8 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Part 4: Testing and Measurement Techniques—Section 8: Power
Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Test
IEC 60601–1–2 Medical Electrical Equipment—Part 1–2: General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance—
Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Disturbances—Requirements and Tests
IEC 60529 2001–2 Degrees of Protection Provided by Enclosures (IP Code)
IEC 60068–2–27: 2008–2 Environmental Testing—Part 2–27: Tests—Test Ea and Guidance: Shock
CISPR 22 Information Technology Equipment—Ratio Disturbance Characteristics—Limits and Methods of Measurement,
Class B, Radiated Disturbance
2.4 IEEE StandardStandards:
IEEE C95.1 Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz
to 300 GHz
IEEE C95.6 Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, 0–3 kHz
2.5 Military Standards:
MIL-STD-810G Method 501.5 Test Method Standard for Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests,
Method 501.5, High Temperature
MIL-STD-810G Method 502.5 Test Method Standard for Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests,
Method 502.5, Low Temperature
MIL-STD-810G Method 507.5 Test Method Standard for Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests,
Method 507.5, Humidity
2.6 ANSI Standard:
ANSI S1.4–1983 Specification for Sound Level Meters
2.7 CIE Standard:
CIE S 014–1/E:2006 Colorimetry—Part 1: CIE Standard Colorimetric Observers
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 alarm—an indication that informs the operator of an event, such as metal detection or a detector (HWMD) status change.
Available from International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO Central Secretariat, BIBC II, Chemin de Blandonnet 8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier, Geneva,
Switzerland, http://www.iso.org.
Available from International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), 3, rue de Varembé, P.O. Box 131, 1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland, http://www.iec.ch.
Available from Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), 445 Hoes Ln., Piscataway, NJ 08854-4141, http://www.ieee.org.
Available from U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, 732 N. Capitol St., NW, Washington, DC 20401-0001, http://www.access.gpo.gov.
F3020 − 20
3.1.2 body simulant—a material engineered to simulate the average electrical conductivity and magnetic permeability of the
human body; the average electrical conductivity is 0.8 S ⁄m 6 0.2 S ⁄m and the average magnetic permeability is
-6 -7
1.26 × 10 H/m 6 5 × 10 H/m.
3.1.2 detector—the hand-worn metal detector (HWMD) that is worn on the hand and is used for finding metal objects concealed
on a person or other object (see Figs. 1 and 2).
3.1.3 detector axis—an imaginary line passing through and perpendicular to the detector plane such that the magnetic field around
the detector axis has the maximum symmetry; the detector axis is labeled as the “z” axis; the location of the detector axis relative
to the HWMD shape and geometry is specified by the manufacturer; the detector axis is the reference for positioning in the
detection performance tests (see Fig. 1).
3.1.4 detector holder—a rectangular prism made of the body simulant on which the HWMD is worn.
3.1.5 detector plane—an imaginary plane (two-dimensional surface) that contains the plane, line, or point on the HWMD surface
that is closest to the object being scanned under typical HWMD use and is perpendicular to the detector axis; the detector plane
contains two orthogonal axes labeled as the “x” axis and as the “y” axis (see Fig. 2).
3.1.6 detection sensitivity setting—an adjustment that can be made to the HWMD that affects its ability to sense metal objects.
3.1.7 measurement coordinate system—a mutually orthogonal three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system referenced to the
detector axis and the detector plane; the three axes are labeled “x,” “y,” and “z,” where the z-axis is parallel to the detector axis
and the x-axis and the y-axis are in the detector plane (see Fig. 2).
3.1.8 measurement plane—an imaginary two-dimensional surface that is parallel to the detector plane and that is tangential to the
plane, line, or point on the test object that is closest to the detector plane; there may be more than one measurement plane; the
measurement plane(s) is (are) referenced from the detector plane (see Fig. 2); there is a measurement plane for each object-size
class of the HWMD, as shown in Table 1.
3.1.9 size class—a classification method based on grouping exemplars of commonly encountered objects that may be either
commercially available or readily fabricated from available materials and that are related to customer applications and object sizes;
a HWMD may meet the requirements for one or all size classes, as defined below. For each size class, there are exemplars
constructed of ferromagnetic metal and exemplars constructed of nonferromagnetic metal.
3.1.9.1 large—represents threat items such as handguns; and similarly sized objects, or larger.
3.1.9.2 medium—represents threat items such as knives having blade lengths exceeding 7.5 cm, and similarly sized objects, up
to the size of a large object.
FIG. 1 Diagram of Hand-Worn Metal Detector Showing the Detector Plane (outlined in red) and the Detector Axis (labeled z)
F3020 − 20
NOTE 1—The x-axis points along the user’s arm.
FIG. 2 Diagram of the Measurement Coordinate System Showing the Measurement Coordinate System Axes, One Measurement Plane,
and the Detector Plane
TABLE 1 Distance Between Measurement Plane and Detector
Plane for the Different HWMD Size Classes
Size Class Distance Between Measurement Plane and Detector
Plane (cm)
Large 1.5 -0/+0.25
Medium 1.0 -0/+0.25
Small 1.0 -0/+0.25
Very Small 0.5 -0/+0.25
3.1.9.3 small—represents threat items such as, but not limited to, knives having blade lengths less than or equal to 7.5 cm,
handcuff keys, handgun rounds, and similarly sized objects, up to the size of a medium object.
3.1.9.4 very small—represents threat items such as t razor blades, hypodermic needles and similarly sized objects, up to the size
of a small object.
3.1.10 test object—an item that is used to test the HWMD detection performance; test objects accurately simulate the
electromagnetic properties of an actual threat or contraband item, such as a weapon or an item that can be used to defeat security
devices; the test objects are described in Section 6.
3.1.11 test object axis—the imaginary line passing through the center of the test object that is referenced to and has a one-to-one
correspondence with the axes of the measurement coordinate system.
3.1.12 x-axis scan range and y-axis scan range—the segment of line along the x and y axis of the measurement coordinate system
that is centered on the detector axis and that extends equally on either side of the detector axis; the detection performance of the
HWMD will be tested along both axes (see Table 2).
F3020 − 20
TABLE 2 X-axis and Y-axis Scan Ranges for the Different HWMD
Size Classes
Size Class X-axis and Y-axis Scan Ranges
lower limit (cm) upper limit (cm)
Large -3.0 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.1
Medium -1.5 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.1
Small -1.0 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1
Very Small -1.0 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1
4. Requirements for Acceptance
NOTE 1—The HWMD shall meet or exceed the requirements and specifications stated in this section. However, it is only to that HWMD unit under test
and at the time of test that a pass/fail assignment can be made with confidence.
NOTE 2—To have confidence that the HWMD unit under test will pass/fail at times other than the time of the initial test or that other units of the same
model will pass/fail requires model evaluation based on a product conformity assessment program, such as that described in Specification F3356 for
Conformity Assessment of Metal Detectors Used in Safety and Security.
NOTE 3—Recommended test report forms are given in Appendix X5.
4.1 General Test Conditions and Requirements:
4.1.1 Testing and Calibration Laboratories—Laboratories performing testing and calibration of the HWMD or its components, or
both, shall meet the requirements of ISO 17025, as amended.
4.1.2 Measurement Equipment and Processes—All measurement equipment and processes shall be certified to ISO 10012–1, as
amended
4.2 Safety Specifications and Requirements:
4.2.1 Electrical—The HWMD shall comply with IEC 61010–1, Section 6, “Protection Against Electrical Shock,” as amended.
4.2.2 Mechanical—The HWMD shall meet requirements of IEC 61010–1, Section 10, “Equipment Temperature Limits and
Resistance to Heat,” as amended.
4.2.3 Thermal—The HWMD shall meet the requirements of IEC 61010–1, Section 10, “Equipment Temperature Limits and
Resistance to Heat,” as amended.
4.2.1 Magnetic Field Exposure—The magnitude of the electromagnetic field generated by the HWMD shall be less than the
7,8
exposure limits specified for general public exposure in the ICNIRP guidelines (see Appendix X4). These measurements shall
be made at points on grid lines that are i) tangential to the current-carrying coil of the HWMD and ii) parallel to the surfaces of
an outward projection from the smallest imaginary rectangular prism enclosing that part of the HWMD encasing the
current-carrying coils. The separation, s , between points on these grid lines shall be 5 mm 6 1 mm and between any parallel
grid
tangential lines shall be 5 mm 6 1 mm. The separation between the outward-projected surface and the smallest imaginary
rectangular prism shall be 5 mm 6 1 mm. A three-axis magnetic field probe with a -3dB analog bandwidth of 0.1 f ≤ f ≤ 10 f ,
c c c
where f is the nominal center frequency of the generated magnetic field, shall be used for measuring the magnetic field, and the
c
size of its active elements shall be within a volume no larger than 2s × 2s × 2s . If the HWMD has not been demonstrated
grid grid grid
to meet this requirement, the manufacturer shall provide a warning with the HWMD instructions that states “This device has not
been demonstrated as being safe or unsafe for use on people with active implanted or body-worn medical devices, or both.”
4.3 Power Requirement:
4.3.1 Battery Life—The HWMD shall meet the detection performance specification given in 4.4 after operating for at least 8 h as
tested in accordance with 5.45.3 and while using a battery of the type and model recommended by the manufacturer.
ICNIRP, “Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz),” International Commission on
Non-Ionizing radiation Protection (ICNIRP), Health Physics, April 1998, Volume 74, No. 4, pp. 494–522.
ICNIRP, “Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (1 Hz to 100 GHz),” International Commission on
Non-Ionizing radiation Protection (ICNIRP), Health Physics, Volume 99, No. 6, pp. 818–836, 2010.
F3020 − 20
4.4 Detection Performance Specifications—The ability of the HWMD to sense the presence of a test object will vary with the
material, type, and orientation of the test object. Consequently, the test objects are grouped according to their size class and the
HWMDs are tested for their ability to detect test objects from within these different size classes. The detection performance
specifications shall be tested using the detection sensitivity setting, if applicable, that is specified by the manufacturer to be
appropriate for each test object size class. All the tests of 4.4 requirements shall be performed within an 8 h 6 0.5 h period without
adjusting the detector sensitivity setting between tests. The detector sensitivity setting shall not be readjusted during testing, or after
changing the battery. The test objects are given in Section 6.
4.4.1 Detection Sensitivity—The HWMD shall exhibit an average probability of detection, p , ≥ 0.95 with an average
d, sens
confidence level of 0.95 for the test objects in each size class, when each object in the size class is positioned in the appropriate
measurement plane (see Table 1) and moving over the appropriate x-axis scan range and y-axis scan range (see Table 2) at a speed
of 0.5 m ⁄s 6 0.05 m ⁄s and tested in accordance with 5.2.2. This requirement is met when
p ≥ p as computed per 5.2.2.
LB d, sens
4.4.2 Detection Speed—The HWMD shall exhibit an average probability of detection p , ≥ 0.95 with an average confidence
d, sp-sens
level of 0.95 for the test objects in each size class, when each object in the size class is positioned in the appropriate measurement
plane (see Table 1) and moving over the appropriate x-axis scan range (see Table 2) at a speed of 0.2 m ⁄s 6 0.01 m ⁄s, 0.5 m ⁄s
6 0.01 m ⁄s, and 1.0 m ⁄s 6 0.01 m ⁄s as tested in accordance with 5.2.3 under the following conditions: (1) The delay between
subsequent tests of a given test object shall be no more than 5 s 6 0.5 s; and (2) The detector sensitivity setting shall not be
readjusted between tests of a given test object or between tests of the test objects of a given size class.
This requirement is met when p ≥ p as computed per 5.2.3.
LB, sp d,sp-sens
4.5 Interference Specifications and Requirements:
4.5.1 Electromagnetic Emission:
4.5.1.1 Radiated Disturbance—The HWMD, when adjusted to meet the requirements of 4.4, shall meet the requirements of CISPR
22, Class B, Radiated disturbance.
4.5.2 Electromagnetic Susceptibility/Immunity—The HWMD shall be tested in accordance with the requirements listed in Table
1 of IEC 61000–6–1, as amended, according to the following procedures:
4.5.2.1 Contact Discharge—The HWMD, after being adjusted to meet the requirements of 4.4, shall be tested in accordance with
IEC 61000–4–2, as amended, for Level 2, contact discharge, and ten trials; and shall subsequently meet the requirements of 4.4
without further adjustment and using the limited set of test objects listed in Section 6.
4.5.2.2 Radiated RF Electromagnetic Field Immunity—The HWMD, when adjusted to meet the requirements of 4.4, shall not
alarm when tested in accordance with IEC 61000–4–3, as amended, for Level 2.
4.5.2.3 60 Hz Radiated Magnetic Field—The HWMD, when adjusted to meet the requirements of 4.4, shall not alarm when tested
in accordance with IEC 61000–4–8, as amended, for testing at 60 Hz, Level 2, and continuous exposure for 30 min 6 5 min.
4.5.3 Body—The HWMD shall exhibit a probability of false alarm, p , ≤ 0.05 with a confidence level of 0.95 when placed in
fa,b
contact with the body or body simulant, as tested in accordance with 5.3. This requirement is met when p ≤ p as computed
UB fa,b
per 5.3.2 and meets, without adjustment of the detector sensitivity, the requirements given in 4.4.
4.5 Environmental Ranges and Conditions—The HWMD or all of its components and their interconnections shall meet all of the
requirements listed in this section. The HWMD shall exhibit no observable changes in the detection performance specification
given in 4.4.24.4.1 and the electrical safety specification given infor the x-axis scan position of 0 4.2.1.cm. The requirements given
in this section shall be applied appropriately for either indoor or indoor/outdoor HWMD models. The tests for the requirements
listed in this section shall be performed on the same unit.
4.5.1 Temperature Stability and Range:
4.5.1.1 Indoor—The HWMD shall operate over the ambient temperature range of at least 0°C0 °C to 46°C.46 °C. The HWMD
shall be tested in accordance with MIL-STD-810G Method 501.5, as amended, Procedure II, Steps 1 through 6, relative humidity
F3020 − 20
6 % 6 3 %, at 46°C46 °C 6 3°C.3 °C. The HWMD then shall be cooled to 0°C0 °C 6 3°C3 °C within 4 h 6 0.5 h and tested
in accordance with MIL-STD-810G Method 502.5, as amended, Procedure II, Steps 1 through 7.
4.5.1.2 Indoor/Outdoor—The HWMD shall operate over the ambient temperature range of at least -21°C-21 °C to 65°C.65 °C.
The HWMD shall be tested in accordance with MIL-STD-810G Method 501.5, as amended, Procedure II, Steps 1 through 6,
relative humidity 6 % 6 3 %, at 65°C65 °C 6 3°C.3 °C. The HWMD then shall be cooled to -21°C-21 °C 6 3°C3 °C within 4 h
6 0.5 h and tested in accordance with MIL-STD-810G, as amended, Procedure II, Steps 1 through 7.
4.6.2 Relative Humidity Stability and Range—The HWMD shall be tested in accordance with the requirements of MIL-STD-810G
Method 507.5, as amended, Procedure I, 10 cycles of Cycle B1, as amended.
4.5.2 Ingress Protection:
4.5.2.1 Indoor—The HWMD shall meet or exceed the requirements for compliance with IEC 60529, as amended, classification
IP20.
4.5.2.2 Indoor/Outdoor—The HWMD shall meet or exceed the requirements for compliance with IEC 60529, as amended,
classification IP54.
4.7 Mechanical Specifications and Requirements—The HWMD or all of its components and their interconnections shall meet the
requirements of the following standards. All tests listed in this section shall be performed on the same unit. The HWMD shall
exhibit no observable changes in the detection performance specification given in 4.4.2 and the electrical safety specification given
in 4.2.1.
4.7.1 Shock—The HWMD shall be tested in accordance with the requirements of IEC 60068–2–27:2002, as amended, using 100
6 5 half-sine shock pulses applied to the top (backhand side) and bottom (palm side) of the detector with each shock pulse having
a nominal peak acceleration of 40 g (400 m/s ) and a nominal pulse duration of 6 ms.
4.7.2 Flexure—The HWMD shall meet the performance requirements of 4.2.1 and 4.4.2 after being tested in accordance with 5.6.
4.6 Alarm Requirements—At least one alarm type, vibratory, audible, or visual, shall be provided and any alarm provided shall
meet the applicable requirement given in this section.
4.6.1 Vibratory Alarm—The vibratory alarm shall produce a force in the range of 0.5 N to 2 N in a frequency range of 10 Hz to
300 Hz as measured in accordance with 5.5.25.4.2.
4.8.2 Audible Alarm—The audible alarms (other than an earphone), if provided, shall produce an alarm-state sound pressure level
of 75 dB 6 5 dB (where 0 dB = 20 μPa root-mean-square in air) at 0.8 m 6 0.08 m from the HWMD as measured in
SPL SPL SPL
accordance with 5.5.3. The audible alarm shall be either a frequency-proportional audible alarm or, optionally, a two-state audible
alarm: active (alarm state) and inactive (nonalarm state).
4.8.2.1 Frequency Range—The frequency range of the audible alarm shall be ≥ 100 Hz and ≤ 4 kHz as tested in accordance with
5.5.4.
4.8.3 Visual Alarm—The visible alarm, if provided, shall be readily perceptible when tested in accordance with 5.5.5. The visual
alarms shall be a two-state visual alarm: active (illuminating) and inactive (nonilluminating).
5. Performance Testing Procedures
5.1 General Test Conditions:
5.1.1 Test Location—The distance between any metal object other than a test object and the closest part of the HWMD shall be
greater than 0.5 m.
5.1.2 Environment—At the time of the tests, the ambient temperature shall be in the range specified in 4.84.6 for the appropriate
application (indoor or indoor/outdoor); the relative humidity shall be noncondensing.
F3020 − 20
5.1.3 Preparations—New batteries of the type listed in the operator’s manual shall be installed at the beginning of the tests and
as instructed in any test method. Any setup or calibration adjustments specified in the operator’s manual shall be performed if
required.
5.2 Detection Performance Tests—The detection performance test methods described in this section are based on the use of a
computer-controlled three-axis positioning system to control the motion and displacement of the test object relative to the HWMD.
Other means of controlling this motion and displacement are acceptable if the positioning and speed values are within the
tolerances specified in these test methods.
If the HWMD can be adjusted to provide an alarm for more than one size class, the detection performance test shall be performed
for each size class. The detection performance shall be evaluated by the test methods described in this section. The distinction in
testing between the different size classes is the difference in the test separation distance between the measurement plane and the
test objects.
5.2.1 Measurement System—The measurement system shall contain the components necessary to perform the tests described
herein. A diagram of the measurement system showing the electrical and mechanical connections between its components shall be
provided.
5.2.1.1 Microphone (Audible Alarm)—The microphone is the audible and vibratory alarm detector. It shall be used to detect an
audible alarm, be capable of detecting the audible alarm described in 4.8.2, and provide an analog output that can be interfaced
to the computer controller (see 5.2.1.3).
5.2.1.2 Light Detector (Visible Alarm)—The light detector is the visible alarm detector. It shall be used to detect a visible alarm
and provide an analog electrical output that can be interfaced to the computer controller (see 5.2.1.3).
5.2.1.1 Computer Controller—The computer controller shall have installed and operational all necessary hardware and software
for providing instrument control and data acquisition.
5.2.2 Detection Sensitivity Test:
5.2.2.1 Initial Procedures—Ensure that the alarm detector and positioning system are connected to the computer controller. Turn
on the alarm detector, computer controller, and positioning system and verify proper operation of the measurement system. Ensure
that the HWMD is securely attached to the detector holder and that the detector holder is fixed in position and secured relative to
the three-axis positioning system. Attach the test object to the positioning system. Turn on the HWMD and ensure that its output
is functioning properly by noting a change in the alarm output as a metal object is brought near the HWMD. Ensure that the test
object does not hit any objects while in motion. There is a minimum number of repeats of a given measurement that must be
performed to meet the performance requirements for a given confidence interval. This minimum number of measurements, N , is
T
given by:
z p
α 0
N 5 ceil , (1)
H J
T
12 p
where p is equal to the probability of detection specified in 4.4.2; z is the critical point of a standard normal distribution and
0 α
is fixed for a given confidence interval; and ceil{x} is a function that returns the smallest integer value that is greater than x.
The value of N includes the number of test objects of a given test object size class (which is two, one each from a ferromag-
T
netic test object and a nonferromagnetic test object) and the number of scans performed. For example, when p = 0.95 and the
confidence level = 0.95, N = 52.
T
Determine the number, n , of y-axis scans to perform at each x-axis position for a given test object and given the number, n ,
s, k x
of practicable x-axis positions, and the total number of required scans, n . The value of n is computed using:
T s, k
n
T
n 5 max , 10 , (2)
H J
s, k
n
x
where the function max{x,y} returns the maximum value of x and y.
5.2.2.2 Performing the Measurement, x-axis Scan Range:
(1) Set the computer program to perform an x-y scan in the specified measurement plane at the specified speed. The center for
the y-axis scans shall be the detector axis and the scans shall each be no less than 10 cm 6 1 cm long.
(2) Set the x-axis position to the specified lower x-axis scan range limit.
(3) Scan the y-axis and record any alarm as the y-axis scan is being performed.
(4) Repeat Step (3) n times to perform a total of n scans for the current x-axis scan position.
s,k s,k
F3020 − 20
(5) Compute the probability of alarm, p where x is the x-axis scan position and i is the x-axis scan index, and obj
d,sens,obj x i k
k, i
represents the test object of the given test object size class with index k, using:
n
s,k
P 5 A (3)
d, sens,k,i ( Pos2sens,k,i,j
n
j51
s,k
where the index abbreviations: k = obj , and i = x are used and A is an integer value representing the occurrence of
k i Pos-sens,k,i,j
the alarm (0 for the nonalarm state and 1 for the alarm state) for each x-axis scan position.
(6) Increment the x-axis position by 0.5 cm 6 0.1 cm.
(7) Repeat Steps (3) through (5) until the x-axis position is at the specified upper x-axis scan range limit and record the number
of alarms at each x , and N is the number of x-axis positions scanned.
i x
(8) Repeat Step (7) for each of the remaining K-1 test object of a given size class, where K is the number of test objects in
a given size class.K = 2 as there is one nonferromagnetic test object and one ferromagnetic test object for each size class.
(9) Upon completion of Step (8), compute the average probability of detection along the x axis, p , using:
d,sens,x
axis
K N
x
p 5 p (4)
d,sens,x d,sens,k.i
((
axis
KN
x k51i51
(10) Compute the average lower bound, p , of
LB,x
axis
p using:
d,sens,x
axis
K N
x
Œ ~P 2 l !
(( d,sens,k,i k,i
k51i51
p 5 P 2 (5)
LB,x d,sens,x
axis axis
KN
x
where:
z
α
p 1 2 p 1
~ !
2 k,i k,i
z 4n
α k,i
p 10.5 2 z
!
k,i α
n n
k,i k,i
l 5 (6)
k,i 2
z
α
n
k,i
where for these tests n = n as computed in 5.2.2.1. For a 95 % confidence interval, z = 1.645, and for a 99 % confidence
k,i s,k a
interval, z = 2.326.
a
5.2.2.3 Performing the Measurement, y-axis Scan Range:
(1) Set the computer program to perform an x-y scan in the specified measurement plane at the specified speed. The center for
the x-axis scans shall be the detector axis and the scans shall each be no less than 10 cm 6 1 cm long.
(2) Set the y-axis position to the specified lower y-axis scan range limit.
(3) Scan the x axis and record any alarm as the x-axis scan is being performed.
(4) Repeat Step (3) n times to perform a total of n scans for the current y-axis scan position.
s,k s,k
(5) Compute the probability of alarm, p , where y is the y-axis scan position and i is the y-axis scan index, and obj
d,sens,obj y i k
k, i
represents the test object of the given test object class with index k, using:
n
s,k
p 5 A , (7)
d,sens,k,i ( Pos2sens,k,i,j
n
s,k j51
where the index abbreviations: k = obj , and i = x are used and A is an integer value representing the occurrence of
k i Pos-sens,k,i,j
the alarm (0 for the nonalarm state and 1 for the alarm state) for each y-axis scan position.
(6) Increment the y-axis position by 0.5 cm 6 0.1 cm.
(7) Repeat Steps (3) through (5) until the y-axis position is at the specified upper y-axis scan range limit and record the number
of alarms at each y , and N is the number of y-axis positions scanned.
i y
(8) Repeat Step (7) for each of the remaining K-1 test object of a given size class, where K is the number of test objects in
a given class. K = 2 as there is one nonferromagnetic test object and one ferromagnetic test object.
(9) Upon completion of Step (8), compute the average probability of detection along the y axis, p , using:
d,sens,y
axis
K N
y
p 5 p . (8)
d,sens,y (( d,sens,k,i
axis
KN
k51i51
y
(10) Compute the average lower bound, p , of p using:
LB,y d,sens,y
axis axis
K N
x
Œ ~p 2 l !
(( d,sens,k,i k,i
k51i5i
p 5 p 2 , (9)
LB,y d,sens,y
axis axis
KN
y
where:
F3020 − 20
z
α
p 1 2 p 1
~ !
2 k,i k,i
z 4n
α k,i
p 10.5 2 z
!
k,i α
n n
k,i k,i
l 5 , (10)
k,i
z
α
n
k,i
where for these tests n = n as computed in 5.2.2.1. For a 95 % confidence interval, z = 1.645, and for a 99 % confidence
k,i s,k a
interval, z = 2.326.
a
5.2.2.4 Computing the Average Probability of Detection—Compute the average probability, p , of detection using:
d
p 1p
LB,x LB,y
axis axis
p 5 , (11)
d
and record and report this value.
5.2.3 Detection Speed Test:
5.2.3.1 Initial Procedures:
(1) Ensure that the alarm detector and positioning system are connected to the computer controller. Turn on the alarm detector,
computer controller, and positioning system and verify proper operation of the measurement system. Ensure that the HWMD is
securely attached to the detector holder and that the detector holder is fixed in position and secured relative to the three-axis
positioning system. Attach the test object to the positioning system. Turn on the HWMD and ensure that its output is functioning
properly by noting a change in the alarm output as a metal object is brought near the HWMD. Ensure that the test object does not
hit any objects while in motion.
(2) Use the value of N computed in Eq 1.
T
(3) Determine the number, n , of y-axis scans to perform at each x-axis position for a given test object and given the number,
s,k
n , of practicable x-axis positions, and the total number of required scans, n . The value of n is computed using:
x T s,k
n
T
n 5 max , 10 , (12)
H J
s,k
n
x
where the function max{x,y} returns the maximum value of x and y.
5.2.3.2 Performing the Measurement:
(1) Set the computer program to perform an x-y scan in the specified measurement plane at the specified speed. The center for
the y-axis scans shall be the detector axis and the scans shall each be no less than 10 cm 6 1 cm long.
(2) Set the x-axis position to the specified lower x-axis scan range limit.
(3) Scan the y axis and record any alarm as the y-axis scan is being performed.
(4) Repeat Step (3) n times to perform a total of n scans for the current x-axis scan position.
s,k s,k
(5) Compute the probability of alarm, p , where x is the x-axis scan position and i is the x-axis scan index, obj
d,sens,obj x s i k
k i m
represents the test object of the given test object size class with index k, and s represents the different speeds with index m, using:
m
n
s
p 5 A (13)
d,sens,k,i,m ( Pos2sens,k,i,m,j
n
j51
s
where the index abbreviations: k = obj , i = x , and m = s are used and A is an integer value representing the oc-
k i m Pos-sens,k,i,m,j
currence of the alarm (0 for the nonalarm state and 1 for the alarm state) for each x-axis scan position.
(6) Increment the x-axis position by 0.5 cm 6 0.1 cm.
(7) Repeat Steps (3) through (6) until the x-axis position is at the specified upper x-axis scan range limit and record the number
of alarms at each x , and N is the number of x-axis positions scanned.
i x
(8) Repeat Step (7) for each of the remaining K-1 test object of a given size class, where K is the number of test objects in
a given size class. K = 2 as there is one nonferromagnetic test object and one ferromagnetic test object.
(9) Repeat Step (8) for each of the M test speeds.
(10) Upon completion of Step (9), compute the average probability of detection, p , using:
d,sp-sens
K N M
x
p 5 p (14)
d,sp2sens ( ( ( d,sens,k,i,m
KN M
k51i5 1m51
x
(11) Compute the average lower bound, p , of p using:
LB,sp d,sp-sens
K N M
x
p 2 l
Œ ~ !
(( ( d,sens,k,i,m k,i,m
k51i51m51
p 5 p , (15)
LB,sp d,sp2sen
KN M
x
where:
F3020 − 20
z
α
p 1 2 p 1
~ !
2 k,i,m k,i,m
z 4n
α k,i,m
p 10.5 2 z
!
k,i,m α
n n
k,i,m k,i,m
l 5 (16)
k,i,m
z
α
n
k,i,m
where for these tests n = n as computed in 5.2.2.1. For a 95 % confidence interval, z = 1.645, and for a 99 % confidence
k,i,m s,k a
interval, z = 2.326.
a
(12) Record and report p .
LB,sp
5.3 Body Interference Test—This test may be performed using a body simulant test object, as described in 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 or a clean
torso, as described in 5.3.3 and 5.3.4. A clean torso is defined here as the torso of a person that is free of any metal objects.
5.3.1 Initial Procedures, Using the Body Simulant Test Object:
(1) Ensure that the alarm detector and positioning system are connected to the computer controller. Turn on the alarm detector,
computer controller, and positioning system and verify proper operation of the measurement system. Ensure that the HWMD is
securely attached to the detector holder and that the detector holder is fixed in position and secured relative to the three-axis
positioning system. Attach the test object to the positioning system. Turn on the HWMD and ensure that its output is functioning
properly by noting a change in the alarm output as a metal object is brought near the HWMD. Ensure that the test object does not
hit any objects while in motion.
(2) This test will require the use of a body simulant test object. This test object shall be constructed of a material exhibiting
-6 -7
an electrical conductivity of 0.8 S ⁄m 6 0.2 S ⁄m and magnetic permeability of 1.26 × 10 H ⁄m 6 5 × 10 H ⁄m and be a
rectangular prism 3 cm 6 0.5 cm thick (parallel to z-axis), 20 cm 6 1 cm long (parallel to x-axis), and 10 cm 6 1 cm wide (parallel
to y-axis).
(3) Use the value of N computed in Eq 1.
T
5.3.2 Performing the Measurement, Using the Body Simulant Test Object:
(1) Set the computer program to perform a y-axis scan passing the body simulant test object through the detector axis 60.1
cm in the appropriate measurement plane at a speed of 0.5 m ⁄s 6 0.05 m ⁄s. The center of the y-axis scan shall be the detector axis
in the appropriate measurement plane, and the y-axis scan shall be 20 cm 6 0.1 cm long. Perform the y-axis scan and record any
alarm occurrence with the alarm detector. Repeat this y-axis scan N one time to yield a total of N scans and compute the average
T T
alarm occurrence using:
N
T
p 5 A , (17)
fa,b Pos2b,j
(
N
T j51
where A is an integer value representing the occurrence of the alarm (0 for the nonalarm state and 1 for the alarm state),
Pos-b,j
j is the scan repeat index, and p is the probability of false alarm for the body interference test.
fa,b
(2) Compute the upper bound, p , of p using:
UB fa,b
z
α
p ~1 2 p !1
fa,b fa,b
z 4N
α T
p 10.5 1z
!
fa,b α
N N
T T
P 5 (18)
UB 2
z
α
N
T
and record and report this value.
5.3.3 Initial Procedures, Using the Clean Torso:
(1) Ensure that the alarm detector is connected to the computer controller. Turn on the alarm detector and computer controller,
and verify proper operation of the measurement system. Ensure that the HWMD is securely attached to a clean hand, which is a
hand free of any metal, from the tips of the fingers of that hand to the elbow of the same arm as the hand being used. Turn on
the HWMD and ensure that its output is functioning properly by noting a change in the alarm output as a metal object is brought
near the HWMD.
(2) Use the value of N computed in Eq 18.
T
5.3.4 Performing the Measurement, Using the Clean Torso:
(1) Place the HWMD against the clean torso and record any alarms.
(2) Repeat Step (1) N 1 times to yield a total of N scans and compute the average alarm occurrence using Eq 17.
T T
(3) Compute the upper bound, p , of p using Eq 18 and record and report this value.
UB fa,b
5.3 Battery Life Test:
F3020 − 20
5.3.1 Initial Procedures—Install in the HWMD new or fully charged batteries of the type specified by the manufacturer. Ensure
that the alarm detector and positioning system are connected to the computer controller. Turn on the alarm detector, computer
controller, and positioning system and verify proper operation of the measurement system. Ensure that the HWMD is securely
attached to the detector holder and that the detector holder is fixed in position and secured relative to the three-axis positioning
system. Attach the test object to the positioning system. Turn on the HWMD and ensure that its output is functioning properly by
noting a change in the alarm output as a metal object is brought near the HWMD. Ensure that the test object does not hit any objects
while in motion.
5.3.2 Performing the Measurement:
(1) Set the computer program to perform a series of x-y scans of a large size test object in the measurement plane for a large
size test object at a speed of about 0.5 m/s. The center for the y-axis scans shall be the detector axis and the scans shall each be
approximately 10 cm long. The duration of this series of scans shall be 8 h 6 0.1 h. The delay between scans shall be 30 s 6 2
s.
(2) After completion of Step (1), set the computer program to perform ten each x-y scans of a small size test object in the
measurement plane for a small size test object at a speed of about 0.5 m/s. The center for the y-axis scans shall be the detector
axis and the scans shall each be approximately 10 cm long. The delay between scans shall be less than 2 s. Compute the alarm
rate, r , using:
alarm
N
alarms
r 5 , (17)
alarm
where N is the number of alarms that were observed in Step (2).
alarms
(3) If r ≥ p , then record and report this as passing the battery life requirement, otherwise record and report as not
alarm d,sens
passing the battery life requirement.
5.4 Alarm Tests:
5.4.1 Equipment:
5.4.1.1 Waveform Recorder—The waveform recorder requirements are:
bandwidth: $10 MHz
input connector: coaxial, preferably BNC
input impedance: $1 M Ω
number of input channels: $2
5.5.1.2 Sound Pressure Level Meter—The sound pressure level meter shall comply with ANSI S1.4-1983 for Type 2, A-weighting,
reference pressure 20 μPa.
5.5.1.3 Audio Frequency Measurement System—The system for measuring the fundamental audio frequency of an audible alarm
shall be capable of measuring a frequency difference with an accuracy of 1 Hz and be capable of providing a new measurement
within 4 s after a change in frequency.
5.5.1.4 Microphone/Acoustic Detector—The acoustic detector requirements are:
bandwidth: $10 kHz
output connector: coaxial, preferably BNC
output impedance: $50 Ω
5.4.1.2 Vibration Detector (Accelerometer)—The vibration detector requirements are:
bandwidth: #5 Hz to $1.2 kHz
output connector: coaxial, preferably BNC
output impedance: $50 Ω
2 2
5.5.1.6 Illumination Meter—The illumination meter shall be capable of measuring light levels of 25 lm/m and 10 000 lm ⁄m with
an error of not more than 10 %. The integrated spectral response shall be within 10 % of the Commission Internationale de
l’Eclairage (CIE, the International Commission on Illumination) [23] photopic curve.
F3020 − 20
5.5.1.7 Light Detector—The light detector requirements are:
bandwidth: $10 kHz
output connector: coaxial, preferably BNC
output impedan
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...