ASTM D5086-01(2008)
(Test Method)Standard Test Method for Determination of Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, and Sodium in Atmospheric Wet Deposition by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
Standard Test Method for Determination of Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, and Sodium in Atmospheric Wet Deposition by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
This test method may be used for the determination of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium in atmospheric wet deposition samples.
Emphasis is placed on the easily contaminated quality of atmospheric wet deposition samples due to the low concentration levels of dissolved metals commonly present.
Annex A1 represents cumulative frequency percentile concentration plots of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium obtained from analyses of over five thousand wet deposition samples. These data may be used as an aid in the selection of appropriate calibration standard concentrations. (3)
SCOPE
1.1 This test method is applicable to the determination of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium in atmospheric wet deposition (rain, snow, sleet, and hail) by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS). (1)
1.2 The concentration ranges are listed below. The range tested was confirmed using the interlaboratory collaborative test (see Table 1 for a statistical summary of the collaborative test).
MDL
(mg/L) (2)Range of Method
(mg/L)Range Tested
(mg/L) Calcium0.0090.03–3.000.168–2.939 Magnesium0.0030.01–1.00 0.039–0.682 Potassium0.0030.01–1.00 0.029–0.499 Sodium0.0030.01–2.000.105–1.84
1.3 The method detection limit (MDL) is based on single operator precision (2) and may be higher or lower for other operators and laboratories. Many workers have found that this test method is reliable at lower levels than were tested, but the precision and bias data presented are insufficient to justify their use at lower levels.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific warning statements are given in 8.3, 8.7, 12.1.8, and Section 9.
General Information
Relations
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D5086 − 01(Reapproved 2008)
Standard Test Method for
Determination of Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, and
Sodium in Atmospheric Wet Deposition by Flame Atomic
Absorption Spectrophotometry
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D5086; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.1 This test method is applicable to the determination of
D883 Terminology Relating to Plastics
calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium in atmospheric
D1129 Terminology Relating to Water
wet deposition (rain, snow, sleet, and hail) by flame atomic
D1193 Specification for Reagent Water
absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS). (1)
D1356 Terminology Relating to Sampling and Analysis of
1.2 The concentration ranges are listed below. The range
Atmospheres
tested was confirmed using the interlaboratory collaborative
D2777 Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias of
test (see Table 1 for a statistical summary of the collaborative
Applicable Test Methods of Committee D19 on Water
test). D4453 Practice for Handling of High Purity Water Samples
D4691 Practice for Measuring Elements in Water by Flame
MDL Range of Method Range Tested
(mg/L) (2) (mg/L) (mg/L)
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
D5012 Guide for Preparation of Materials Used for the
Calcium 0.009 0.03–3.00 0.168–2.939
Collection and Preservation of Atmospheric Wet Deposi-
Magnesium 0.003 0.01–1.00 0.039–0.682
Potassium 0.003 0.01–1.00 0.029–0.499
tion
Sodium 0.003 0.01–2.00 0.105–1.84
E131 Terminology Relating to Molecular Spectroscopy
1.3 The method detection limit (MDL) is based on single E275 Practice for Describing and Measuring Performance of
operator precision (2) and may be higher or lower for other Ultraviolet and Visible Spectrophotometers
operators and laboratories. Many workers have found that this E694 Specification for Laboratory Glass Volumetric Appa-
ratus
test method is reliable at lower levels than were tested, but the
IEEE/ASTM SI-10 Standard for Use of the International
precision and bias data presented are insufficient to justify their
System of Units (SI): The Modern Metric System
use at lower levels.
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
3. Terminology
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
3.1 Definitions:
standard.
3.1.1 For definitions of terms used in this test method, refer
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the
to Terminologies D883, D1129, D1356, E131, and Practices
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
D4691, E275, and IEEE/ASTM SI-10.
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
3.1.2 method detection limit, MDL—the minimum concen-
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
tration of an analyte that can be reported with 99 % confidence
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific warning
that the value is above zero based on a standard deviation of
statements are given in 8.3, 8.7, 12.1.8, and Section 9.
greater than seven repetitive measurements of a solution
containing the analyte at a concentration near the low standard.
Theanalyteconcentrationofthissolutionshouldnotbegreater
than ten times the estimated MDL.
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D22 on Air
Quality and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D22.03 on Ambient
Atmospheres and Source Emissions.
Current edition approved April 1, 2008. Published July 2008. Originally
published as D5086 – 90. Last previous edition D5086 – 01. DOI: 10.1520/D5086- For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
01R08. contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to a list of references at the end of Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
this test method. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D5086 − 01 (2008)
TABLE 1 Interlaboratory Precision and Bias for Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, and Sodium Determined from Analyte Spikes of
Synthetic Atmospheric Wet Deposition Samples
Amount Mean 95 % 95 %
A B
Number of S S Bias, Bias, Significant
t o
Element Added, Recovery, Reproducibility Repeatability
Observations mg/L % at 5 % Level
mg/L mg/L Limit Limit
Ca 18 0.168 0.160 0.0062 0.017 0.0063 0.018 −0.008 −4.76 yes
21 0.382 0.332 0.027 0.076 0.011 0.031 −0.030 −7.85 yes
19 0.769 0.722 0.018 0.050 0.0091 0.025 −0.047 −6.11 yes
21 1.448 1.334 0.038 0.106 0.025 0.070 −0.114 −7.87 yes
20 2.939 2.770 0.047 0.132 0.037 0.104 −0.169 −5.75 yes
Mg 18 0.039 0.037 0.0033 0.0092 0.0016 0.0045 −0.002 −5.13 yes
17 0.089 0.090 0.0061 0.017 0.0019 0.0053 0.001 1.12 no
15 0.178 0.180 0.0057 0.016 0.0029 0.0081 0.002 1.12 no
17 0.336 0.336 0.014 0.039 0.0038 0.011 0.00 0.00 no
17 0.682 0.696 0.012 0.034 0.0037 0.010 0.014 2.05 yes
K 16 0.029 0.043 0.0036 0.010 0.0032 0.0090 0.014 48.3 yes
16 0.065 0.068 0.0046 0.013 0.0012 0.0034 0.003 4.62 yes
15 0.130 0.132 0.013 0.036 0.0038 0.011 0.002 1.54 no
17 0.246 0.239 0.020 0.056 0.010 0.028 −0.007 −2.84 no
17 0.499 0.507 0.025 0.070 0.014 0.039 0.008 1.60 no
Na 18 0.225 0.219 0.014 0.039 0.0056 0.016 −0.006 −2.67 no
22 0.105 0.104 0.0010 0.027 0.0021 0.0059 −0.001 −0.95 no
20 0.239 0.235 0.0053 0.015 0.0038 0.011 −0.004 −1.67 yes
17 0.481 0.475 0.0070 0.020 0.0046 0.013 −0.006 −1.24 yes
18 0.906 0.856 0.0087 0.024 0.0073 0.020 −0.050 −5.52 yes
22 1.84 1.85 0.041 0.115 0.021 0.059 0.01 0.54 no
A
Between laboratory precision, reproducibility.
B
Within laboratory precision (pooled single operator precision), repeatability.
4. Summary of Test Method 5. Significance and Use
5.1 This test method may be used for the determination of
4.1 Asolutioncontainingthemetal(s)ofinterestisaspirated
calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium in atmospheric
as a fine mist into an air acetylene flame where it is converted
wet deposition samples.
to an atomic vapor consisting of ground state atoms. These
5.2 Emphasisisplacedontheeasilycontaminatedqualityof
ground state atoms are capable of absorbing electromagnetic
atmospheric wet deposition samples due to the low concentra-
radiation over a series of very narrow, sharply defined wave-
tion levels of dissolved metals commonly present.
lengths from a distinct line source of light, usually a hollow
cathode lamp specific to the metal of interest, passed through
5.3 Annex A1 represents cumulative frequency percentile
the flame. Light from the source beam, less whatever intensity
concentration plots of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and
was absorbed by the atoms of the metal of interest, is isolated
sodium obtained from analyses of over five thousand wet
bythemonochromatorandmeasuredbythephotodetector.The deposition samples. These data may be used as an aid in the
amount of light absorbed by the analyte is quantified by selectionofappropriatecalibrationstandardconcentrations. (3)
comparing the light transmitted through the flame to light
6. Interferences
transmitted by a reference beam.The amount of light absorbed
in the flame is proportional to the concentration of the metal in
6.1 A chemical interference can prevent, enhance, or sup-
solution. The relationship between absorption and concentra-
press the formation of ground state atoms in the flame. For
tion is expressed by Beer’s Law:
example,inthecaseofcalciumdeterminations,thepresenceof
phosphate or sulfate can result in the formation of a salt that
log I /I 5 abc 5 A (1)
~ !
o
hinders proper atomization of the solution when it is aspirated
where:
into the flame. This decreases the number of free, ground state
I = incident radiant power, atoms in the flame, resulting in lowered absorbance values.
o
I = transmitted radiant power,
Aluminum can cause a similar interference when measuring
a = absorptivity (constant for a given system),
magnesium. The addition of appropriate complexing agents,
b = sample path length,
suchaslanthanum,tothesamplesolutionreducesoreliminates
c = concentration of absorbing species, and
chemical interferences and may increase the sensitivity of this
A = absorbance.
test method.
The atomic absorption spectrophotometer is calibrated with
6.2 Alkali metals, such as potassium and sodium, can
standard solutions containing known concentrations of the
undergo ionization in an air-acetylene flame resulting in a
element(s) of interest. The concentration of each analyte in the
decrease in ground state atoms available for measurement by
unknown sample is determined from contructed calibration
atomic absorption. The addition of a large excess of an easily
curves. ionizable element, such as cesium, will eliminate this problem,
D5086 − 01 (2008)
since cesium will be preferentially ionized. The preferential 7.4 Laboratory Facilities—Laboratories used for the analy-
ionization of the cesium results in an enhanced atomic absorp- sis of atmospheric wet deposition samples should be free from
tion signal for both potassium and sodium. external sources of contamination.
7.4.1 The use of laminar flow clean air workstations is
6.3 If a sample containing low concentrations of the metal
recommended for sample processing and preparation to avoid
being measured is analyzed immediately after a sample having
the introduction of airborne contaminants. If a clean air
a concentration exceeding the concentration of the highest
workstations is unavailable, samples must be capped or cov-
calibration standard, sample carryover can result in elevated
ered prior to analysis.
readings due to residual metal from the previous sample. To
7.4.2 Apositive pressure environment within the laboratory
prevent this interference, routinely aspirate water for about 15
is recommended to minimize the introduction of external
s after a high concentration sample. Depending on the concen-
sourcesofcontaminantgasesandparticulates.Windowswithin
tration of metal in the last sample analyzed, it may be
the laboratory should be kept closed at all times and sealed if
necessarytorinseforlongertimeperiods.Completepurgingof
leaks are apparent.
the system is ascertained by aspirating water until the absor-
7.4.3 The use of disposable tacky floor mats at the entrance
bance readout returns to the baseline.
to the laboratory is helpful in reducing the particulate loading
6.4 Atmospheric wet deposition samples are characterized
within the room.
by low ionic strength and rarely contain enough salts to cause
interferences due to non-specific background absorbance. The
8. Reagents and Materials
use of background correction techniques is not necessary and
8.1 Purity of Reagents—Use reagent grade or higher grade
will decrease the signal to noise ratio and lessen precision.
chemicals for all solutions. All reagents shall conform to the
specifications of the Committee on Analytical Reagents of the
7. Apparatus
American Chemical Society (ACS) where such specifications
7.1 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer—Select a
are available.
double-beam instrument having a monochromator,
8.2 Purity of Water—Unless otherwise indicated, references
photodetector, pressure-reducing valves, adjustable spectral
to water shall be understood to mean reagent water as defined
bandwidth, and a wavelength range of 190 to 800 nm.
by Type I of Specification D1193. Point of use 0.2 µm filters
Peripheral equipment may include a strip chart recorder or a
arerecommendedforallfaucetssupplyingwatertopreventthe
suitable data system.
introduction of bacteria and/or ion exchange resins into re-
7.1.1 Burner—Use a long-path, single slot, air-acetylene
agents.
burner head supplied by the manufacturer of the spectropho-
8.3 Acetylene (Fuel)—Minimum acceptable acetylene pu-
tometer.
rity is 99.5 % (v/v). Change the cylinder when the pressure
7.1.2 Hollow Cathode Lamps—Single element lamps are
reaches 517 kPa (75 psig) if the acetylene is packed in acetone.
recommended. Multi-element lamps are available but are not
Pre-purified grades that contain a proprietary solvent can be
recommended. They have a shorter lifespan, are less sensitive,
used to 207 kPa (30 psig) before replacement.Avoid introduc-
require a higher operating current, and increase the chances of
ing these solvents into the instrument. Damage to the instru-
spectral interferences.
ment’s plumbing system can result. To prevent solvent
7.1.3 Monochromator—To increase the sensitivity for cal-
carryover, allow acetylene cylinders to stand for at least 24 h
cium and potassium measurements, a monochromator
before use. (Warning—Acetylene is a highly flammable gas.
equipped with a blaze grating in the range of 500 to 600 nm is
Follow the precautions in 9.3-9.6 regarding safe operating
recommended. For the analysis of magnesium and sodium, a
pressures, suitable plumbing, and operator safety.)
blaze grating in the range of 200 to 250 nm is adequate.
7.1.4 Photomultiplier Tube—A wide spectral range (160 to
8.4 Cesium Solution (Ionization Suppressant)—Dissolve
900 nm) photomultiplier tube is recommended. Select a red-
126.7gcesiumchloride(CsCl),driedat105°Cfor1h,inwater
sensitive photomultiplier tube to detect potassium at 766.5 nm
and dilute to 1 L. Store at room temperature in a high density
and to increase sensitivity for calcium at 422.7 nm.
polyethylene or polypropylene container.
7.2 Volumetric Pipets—MaintainasetofClassAvolumetric
8.5 Hydrochloric Acid (1+1)—Carefully add one volume of
pipets (see Specification E694) to be used only when making
concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl, sp gr 1.19) to an equal
dilute calibration solutions for the analysis of atmospheric wet
volume of water.
deposition samples.Alternatively, disposable tip pipets may be
8.6 Hydrochloric Acid (1+19)—Carefully add 50 mL of
used.
concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl, sp gr 1.19) to 900 mL of
7.3 VolumetricFlasks—MaintainasetofClassAvolumetric
water and dilute to 1 L.
flasks (see Specification E694) to be used only when making
dilute calibration solutions for the analysis of atmospheric wet
deposition samples.
Reagent Chemicals, American Chemical Society Specifications , American
Chemical Society, Washington, DC. For suggestions on the testing of reagents not
7.3.1 The first time any glassware is used for making stock
listed by the American Chemical Society, see Analar Standards for Laboratory
solutions and standards, clean with HCl (1+1) and rinse
Chemicals, BDH Ltd., Poole, Dorset, U.K., and the Un
...
This document is not anASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of anASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
An American National Standard Designation: D 5086 – 01 (Reapproved 2008)
Designation:D5086–95
Standard Test Method for
Determination of Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, and
Sodium in Atmospheric Wet Deposition by Flame Atomic
Absorption Spectrophotometry
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 5086; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method is applicable to the determination of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium in atmospheric wet
deposition (rain, snow, sleet, and hail) by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS). (1)
1.2 The concentration ranges are listed below. The range tested was confirmed using the interlaboratory collaborative test (see
Table 1 for a statistical summary of the collaborative test).
MDL Range of Method Range Tested
(mg/L) (2) (mg/L) (mg/L)
Calcium 0.009 0.03–3.00 0.168–2.939
Magnesium 0.003 0.01–1.00 0.039–0.682
Potassium 0.003 0.01–1.00 0.029–0.499
Sodium 0.003 0.01–2.00 0.105–1.84
1.3 The method detection limit (MDL) is based on single operator precision (2) and may be higher or lower for other operators
and laboratories. Many workers have found that this test method is reliable at lower levels than were tested, but the precision and
bias data presented are insufficient to justify their use at lower levels.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use. Specific precautionary statements are given in Note 1, Note 2, and Note 6 and Section Specific warning
statements are given in 8.3, 8.7, 12.1.8, and Section 9.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D 883Terminology Relating to Plastics Test Methods for Asbestos-Cement Flat Products
D 1129Terminology Relating to Water Test Methods for Asbestos-Cement Flat Products
D 1193Specification for Reagent Water Test Methods for Asbestos-Cement Flat Products
D 1356Terminology Relating to Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheres Test Methods for Asbestos-Cement Flat Products
D 2777Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias of Applicable Methods of Committee D-19 on Water Test Methods
for Asbestos-Cement Flat Products
D 4453Practice for Handling of Ultra-Pure Water Samples Test Methods for Asbestos-Cement Flat Products
D 4691Practice for Measuring Elements in Water by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry Test Methods for
Asbestos-Cement Flat Products
D 5012Guide for Preparation of Materials Used for the Collection and Preservation of Atmospheric Wet Deposition Test
Methods for Asbestos-Cement Flat Products
E 131Terminology Relating to Molecular Spectroscopy Test Methods for Asbestos-Cement Flat Products
E 275Practice for Describing and Measuring Performance of Ultraviolet, Visible, and Near Infrared Spectrophotometers
This test method is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D-22 on Sampling andAnalysis ofAtmospheres and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D22.06
on Atmospheric Deposition.
Current edition approved Jan. 15, 1995. Published March 1995. Originally published as D5086–90. Last previous edition D5086–90.
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D22 on Air Quality and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D22.03 on Ambient Atmospheres
and Source Emissions.
Current edition approved April 1, 2008. Published July 2008. Originally published as D 5086 – 90. Last previous edition D 5086 – 01.
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to a list of references at the end of this test method.
For referencedASTM standards, visit theASTM website, www.astm.org, or contactASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol 08.01.volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
D5086–01 (2008)
TABLE 1 Interlaboratory Precision and Bias for Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, and Sodium Determined from Analyte Spikes of
Synthetic Atmospheric Wet Deposition Samples
Amount Mean 95 % 95 %
A B
Number of S S Bias, Bias, Significant
t o
Element Added, Recovery, Reproducibility Repeatability
Observations mg/L % at 5 % Level
mg/L mg/L Limit Limit
Ca 18 0.168 0.160 0.0062 0.017 0.0063 0.018 −0.008 −4.76 yes
21 0.382 0.332 0.027 0.076 0.011 0.031 −0.030 −7.85 yes
19 0.769 0.722 0.018 0.050 0.0091 0.025 −0.047 −6.11 yes
21 1.448 1.334 0.038 0.106 0.025 0.070 −0.114 −7.87 yes
20 2.939 2.770 0.047 0.132 0.037 0.104 −0.169 −5.75 yes
Mg 18 0.039 0.037 0.0033 0.0092 0.0016 0.0045 −0.002 −5.13 yes
17 0.089 0.090 0.0061 0.017 0.0019 0.0053 0.001 1.12 no
15 0.178 0.180 0.0057 0.016 0.0029 0.0081 0.002 1.12 no
17 0.336 0.336 0.014 0.039 0.0038 0.011 0.00 0.00 no
17 0.682 0.696 0.012 0.034 0.0037 0.010 0.014 2.05 yes
K 16 0.029 0.043 0.0036 0.010 0.0032 0.0090 0.014 48.3 yes
16 0.065 0.068 0.0046 0.013 0.0012 0.0034 0.003 4.62 yes
15 0.130 0.132 0.013 0.036 0.0038 0.011 0.002 1.54 no
17 0.246 0.239 0.020 0.056 0.010 0.028 −0.007 −2.84 no
17 0.499 0.507 0.025 0.070 0.014 0.039 0.008 1.60 no
Na 18 0.225 0.219 0.014 0.039 0.0056 0.016 −0.006 −2.67 no
22 0.105 0.104 0.0010 0.027 0.0021 0.0059 −0.001 −0.95 no
20 0.239 0.235 0.0053 0.015 0.0038 0.011 −0.004 −1.67 yes
17 0.481 0.475 0.0070 0.020 0.0046 0.013 −0.006 −1.24 yes
18 0.906 0.856 0.0087 0.024 0.0073 0.020 −0.050 −5.52 yes
22 1.84 1.85 0.041 0.115 0.021 0.059 0.01 0.54 no
A
Between laboratory precision, reproducibility.
B
Within laboratory precision (pooled single operator precision), repeatability.
E380Practice for the International System of Units (SI) (the Modernized Metric System) Test Methods for Asbestos-Cement
Flat Products
E 694Specification for Laboratory Glass Volumetric Apparatus Test Methods for Asbestos-Cement Flat Products
IEEE/ASTM SI-10 Standard for Use of the International System of Units (SI): The Modern Metric System
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms used in this test method, refer to Terminologies D 883, D 1129, E131, D 1356, E 131,
and Practices D 4691, E 275, and E380IEEE/ASTM SI 10.
3.1.1 method detection limit, MDL—the minimum concentration of an analyte that can be reported with 99 % confidence that
the value is above zero based on a standard deviation of greater than seven repetitive measurements of a solution containing the
analyte at a concentration near the low standard.The analyte concentration of this solution should not be greater than fiveten times
the estimated MDL. (3)
4. Summary of Test Method
4.1 Asolution containing the metal(s) of interest is aspirated as a fine mist into an air acetylene flame where it is converted to
an atomic vapor consisting of ground state atoms. These ground state atoms are capable of absorbing electromagnetic radiation
over a series of very narrow, sharply defined wavelengths from a distinct line source of light, usually a hollow cathode lamp
specifictothemetalofinterest,abeampassedthroughtheflame.Lightfromthesourcebeam,lesswhateverintensitywasabsorbed
by the atoms of the metal of interest, is isolated by the monochromator and measured by the photodetector. The amount of light
absorbedbytheanalyteisquantifiedbycomparingthelighttransmittedthroughtheflametolighttransmittedbyareferencebeam.
The amount of light absorbed in the flame is proportional to the concentration of the metal in solution. The relationship between
absorption and concentration is expressed by Beer’s Law:
log ~I /I! 5 abc 5 A (1)
o
(1)
where:
I = incident radiant power,
o
I = transmitted radiant power,
a = absorptivity (constant for a given system),
b = sample path length,
c = concentration of absorbing species, and
A = absorbance.
The atomic absorption spectrophotometer is calibrated with standard solutions containing known concentrations of the
element(s) of interest. The concentration of each analyte in the unknown sample is determined from contructed calibration curves.
D5086–01 (2008)
5. Significance and Use
5.1 This test method may be used for the determination of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium in atmospheric wet
deposition samples.
5.2 Emphasis is placed on the easily contaminated quality of atmospheric wet deposition samples due to the low concentration
levels of dissolved metals commonly present.
5.3 Annex A1 represents cumulative frequency percentile concentration plots of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium
obtained from analyses of over five thousand wet deposition samples. These data may be used as an aid in the selection of
appropriate calibration standard concentrations. (43)
6. Interferences
6.1 A chemical interference can prevent, enhance, or suppress the formation of ground state atoms in the flame. For example,
in the case of calcium determinations, the presence of phosphate or sulfate can result in the formation of a salt that hinders proper
atomization of the solution when it is aspirated into the flame. This decreases the number of free, ground state atoms in the flame,
resulting in lowered absorbance values.Aluminum can cause a similar interference when measuring magnesium. The addition of
appropriate complexing agents, such as lanthanum, to the sample solution reduces or eliminates chemical interferences and may
increase the sensitivity of this test method.
6.2 Alkali metals, such as potassium and sodium, can undergo ionization in an air-acetylene flame resulting in a decrease in
ground state atoms available for measurement by atomic absorption. The addition of a large excess of an easily ionizable element,
such as cesium, will eliminate this problem, since cesium will be preferentially ionized. The preferential ionization of the cesium
results in an enhanced atomic absorption signal for both potassium and sodium.
6.3 If a sample containing low concentrations of the metal being measured is analyzed immediately after a sample having a
concentration exceeding the concentration of the highest calibration standard, sample carryover willcan result in elevated readings
due to residual metal from the previous sample. To prevent this interference, routinely aspirate water for about 15 s after a high
concentration sample. Depending on the concentration of metal in the last sample analyzed, it may be necessary to rinse for longer
timeperiods.Completepurgingofthesystemisascertainedbyaspiratingwateruntiltheabsorbancereadoutreturnstothebaseline.
6.4 Atmospheric wet deposition samples are characterized by low ionic strength and rarely contain enough salts to cause
interferences due to non-specific background absorbance. The use of background correction techniques is not necessary and will
decrease the signal to noise ratio and lessen precision.
7. Apparatus
7.1 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer—Select a double-beam instrument having a dual grating monochromator, photode-
tector, pressure-reducing valves, adjustable spectral bandwidth, and a wavelength range of 190 to 800 nm. Peripheral equipment
may include a strip chart recorder or a suitable data system.
7.1.1 Burner—Use a long-path, single slot, air-acetylene burner head supplied by the manufacturer of the spectrophotometer.
7.1.2 Hollow Cathode Lamps—Single element lamps are recommended. Multi-element lamps are available but are not
recommended. They have a shorter lifespan, are less sensitive, require a higher operating current, and increase the chances of
spectral interferences.
7.1.3 Monochromator—To increase the sensitivity for calcium and potassium measurements, a monochromator equipped with
a blaze grating in the range of 500 to 600 nm is recommended. For the analysis of magnesium and sodium, a blaze grating in the
range of 200 to 250 nm is adequate.
7.1.4 Photomultiplier Tube—A wide spectral range (160 to 900 nm) photomultiplier tube is recommended. Select a
red-sensitive photomultiplier tube to detect potassium at 766.5 nm and to increase sensitivity for calcium at 422.7 nm.
7.2 Volumetric Pipets—Maintain a set of Class A volumetric pipets (see Specification E 694) to be used only when making
dilutecalibrationsolutionsfortheanalysisofatmosphericwetdepositionsamples.Alternatively,disposabletippipetsmaybeused.
7.3 Volumetric Flasks—Maintain a set of Class A volumetric flasks (see Specification E 694) to be used only when making
dilute calibration solutions for the analysis of atmospheric wet deposition samples.
7.3.1 The first time any glassware is used for making stock solutions and standards, clean with HCl (1+1) and rinse thoroughly
with water before use.
7.3.2 Store clean glassware filled with water and covered.
7.4 Laboratory Facilities—Laboratories used for the analysis of atmospheric wet deposition samples should be free from
external sources of contamination.
7.4.1 The use of laminar flow clean air workstations is recommended for sample processing and preparation to avoid the
introduction of airborne contaminants. If a clean air workstations is unavailable, samples must be capped or covered prior to
analysis.
7.4.2 A positive pressure environment within the laboratory is recommended to minimize the introduction of external sources
of contaminant gases and particulates. Windows within the laboratory should be kept closed at all times and sealed if leaks are
apparent.
7.4.3 Theuseofdisposabletackyfloormatsattheentrancetothelaboratoryishelpfulinreducingtheparticulateloadingwithin
the room.
D5086–01 (2008)
8. Reagents and Materials
8.1 Purity of Reagents—Use reagent grade or higher grade chemicals for all solutions. All reagents shall conform to the
specifications of the Committee on Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Society (ACS) where such specifications are
available.
8.2 Purity of Water—Unless otherwise indicated, references to water shall be understood to mean reagent water as defined by
Type III of Specification D 1193. Point of use 0.2 µm filters are recommended for all faucets supplying water to prevent the
introduction of bacteria and/or ion exchange resins into reagents.
8.3 Acetylene(Fuel)—
...










Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.