Standard Test Method for Bench Oxidation of Engine Oils by ROBO Apparatus

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This bench test method is intended to produce comparable oil aging characteristics to those obtained with ASTM TMC Sequence IIIGA matrix reference oils 434, 435, and 438 after aging in the Sequence IIIG engine test.  
5.2 To the extent that the method generates aged oils comparable to those from the Sequence IIIG engine test, the measured increases in kinematic and MRV viscosity indicate the tendency of an oil to thicken because of volatilization and oxidation, as in the Sequence IIIG and IIIGA (see Appendix X1 in Test Method D7320) engine tests, respectively.  
5.3 This bench test procedure has potential use in specifications and classifications of engine lubricating oils, such as Specification D4485.  
5.4 The results of this test method are valid when seeking qualification of oils against published specifications only when run on a test stand that has successfully met the calibration requirements specified under the TMC’s ROBO test monitoring program.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method describes a bench procedure to simulate the oil aging encountered in Test Method D7320, the Sequence IIIG engine test method. These aged oils are then tested for kinematic viscosity and for low-temperature pumpability properties as described in the Sequence IIIGA engine test, Appendix X1 of Test Method D7320.  
1.2 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.2.1 Exceptions—There are no SI equivalents for some apparatus in Section 6, and there are some figures where inch units are to be regarded as standard.  
1.3 This test method is arranged as follows:    
Section  
Scope  
1  
Reference Documents  
2  
Terminology  
3  
Summary of Test Method  
4  
Significance and Use  
5  
Apparatus  
6  
Reagents and Materials  
7  
Hazards  
8  
New and Existing Test Stand Calibration  
9  
Procedure  
10  
Cleaning  
11  
Calculations and Determination of Test Results  
12  
Report  
13  
Precision and Bias  
14  
Keywords  
15  
Annexes  
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Organization  
Annex A1  
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Calibration Procedures  
Annex A2  
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Maintenance Activities  
Annex A3  
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Related Information  
Annex A4  
Reaction Vessel  
Annex A5  
Reaction Vessel Head  
Annex A6  
Reaction Vessel-to-Head Seal  
Annex A7  
Agitator Turbine Blade  
Annex A8  
Agitator Packing Gland  
Annex A9  
Nitrogen Dioxide Graduated Tube  
Annex A10  
Vacuum System Plumbing  
Annex A11  
Vacuum Trap Condensers  
Annex A12  
Setting the Vacuum Control Valve  
Annex A13  
Appendixes  
Sample Preparation and Addition  
Appendix X1  
Charging the Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide  
Appendix X2  
Nitrogen Dioxide Precision Needle Valve  
Appendix X3  
Example of an Assembled ROBO Apparatus  
Appendix X4  
Information Package to Aid Setting Up a New Robo Apparatus  
Appendix X5  
Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide in Air Option Information  
Appendix X6  
Time-Averaged Subsurface Air Flow Rate  
Appendix X7  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific warning statements are given in Sections 7 and 8.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-Mar-2022

Relations

Effective Date
01-Apr-2024
Effective Date
15-Dec-2023
Effective Date
01-Nov-2023
Effective Date
01-Jul-2023
Effective Date
01-Jun-2020
Effective Date
01-Jul-2018
Effective Date
01-Oct-2017
Effective Date
01-Jul-2017
Effective Date
01-Jul-2017
Effective Date
01-May-2017
Effective Date
15-Dec-2016
Effective Date
15-Dec-2016
Effective Date
01-Oct-2016
Effective Date
01-Apr-2016
Effective Date
01-Oct-2015

Overview

ASTM D7528-22 is the Standard Test Method for Bench Oxidation of Engine Oils by ROBO Apparatus, developed by ASTM International. This method provides a bench-scale procedure that simulates the oil aging characteristics experienced in engine tests, including the Sequence IIIG and IIIGA, by using the ROBO (Romaszewski Oil Bench Oxidation) apparatus. The main objective is to predict the oxidative stability and thickening tendencies of engine lubricating oils, supporting their qualification for various industry specifications.

This test method is recognized for its ability to produce results comparable with those from full-scale engine tests for reference oils. By offering a controlled environment for accelerated oil oxidation, D7528-22 significantly aids oil formulators, laboratories, and quality assurance processes in the efficient evaluation of engine oil performance.

Key Topics

  • Oil Oxidation and Volatilization: The method measures increases in kinematic and MRV viscosity to indicate the oil’s tendency to thicken, much like in the Sequence IIIG engine test.
  • Oil Aging Simulation: The procedure simulates the effects of heat, air, and catalytic metals on oil by subjecting samples to elevated temperatures with forced air and nitrogen dioxide in a specialized reaction vessel.
  • Calibration and Consistency: Results are only valid for specification qualification when the ROBO test stand follows the calibration requirements specified under the ASTM Test Monitoring Center (TMC) program.
  • Reference and Candidate Oils: Reference oils with known properties ensure reliable benchmarking, while the standard provides guidance on handling non-reference and candidate oils for specification testing.
  • Reporting and Precision: The standard specifies detailed reporting requirements, including operational data and calibration protocols, to ensure repeatability and data integrity.
  • Safety Considerations: Due to the use of hazardous reagents like nitrogen dioxide, the standard emphasizes the implementation of safety, health, and environmental controls.

Applications

The ASTM D7528-22 standard serves multiple practical applications in the lubricants industry:

  • Engine Oil Specification Compliance: Supports rapid bench screening of engine oils prior to, or as an alternative to, full-scale engine tests. This is especially beneficial for qualifying oils to meet the requirements of standards such as ASTM D4485.
  • Research and Development: Ideal for formulation optimization, R&D teams can quickly assess how additives and base oils perform under high oxidative stress.
  • Quality Assurance: Oil manufacturers and independent laboratories use D7528-22 for routine QA checks to ensure batch-to-batch consistency of engine oils.
  • Industry Programs: The method is integral to industry registration schemes-such as those managed by the American Chemistry Council or the American Petroleum Institute-often requiring compliance with TMC calibration for official results.
  • Comparative Performance Evaluation: Enables standard comparison among oils, leveraging reference matrix oils for robust benchmarking.

Related Standards

This standard draws upon and should be referenced in conjunction with several key documents:

  • ASTM D445: Test Method for Kinematic Viscosity of Transparent and Opaque Liquids
  • ASTM D4485: Specification for Performance of Active API Service Category Engine Oils
  • ASTM D4684: Determination of Yield Stress and Apparent Viscosity of Engine Oils at Low Temperature
  • ASTM D5293: Apparent Viscosity of Engine Oils and Base Stocks at Low Temperatures
  • ASTM D7320: Evaluation of Automotive Engine Oils in the Sequence IIIG, Spark-Ignition Engine
  • SAE J300: Engine Oil Viscosity Classification

Each of these standards provides supporting test methods or definitions that ensure a comprehensive understanding and proper implementation of ASTM D7528-22 in the evaluation of engine oil oxidation stability.


Keywords: ASTM D7528-22, ROBO apparatus, engine oil oxidation, oil aging simulation, engine lubricant testing, ASTM TMC calibration, viscosity increase, oil quality assurance, engine oil specification, accelerated oxidation test.

Buy Documents

Standard

ASTM D7528-22 - Standard Test Method for Bench Oxidation of Engine Oils by ROBO Apparatus

English language (25 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off
Standard

REDLINE ASTM D7528-22 - Standard Test Method for Bench Oxidation of Engine Oils by ROBO Apparatus

English language (25 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

ABS Quality Evaluations Inc.

American Bureau of Shipping quality certification.

ANAB United States Verified

Element Materials Technology

Materials testing and product certification.

UKAS United Kingdom Verified

ABS Group Brazil

ABS Group certification services in Brazil.

CGCRE Brazil Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

ASTM D7528-22 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Test Method for Bench Oxidation of Engine Oils by ROBO Apparatus". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 This bench test method is intended to produce comparable oil aging characteristics to those obtained with ASTM TMC Sequence IIIGA matrix reference oils 434, 435, and 438 after aging in the Sequence IIIG engine test. 5.2 To the extent that the method generates aged oils comparable to those from the Sequence IIIG engine test, the measured increases in kinematic and MRV viscosity indicate the tendency of an oil to thicken because of volatilization and oxidation, as in the Sequence IIIG and IIIGA (see Appendix X1 in Test Method D7320) engine tests, respectively. 5.3 This bench test procedure has potential use in specifications and classifications of engine lubricating oils, such as Specification D4485. 5.4 The results of this test method are valid when seeking qualification of oils against published specifications only when run on a test stand that has successfully met the calibration requirements specified under the TMC’s ROBO test monitoring program. SCOPE 1.1 This test method describes a bench procedure to simulate the oil aging encountered in Test Method D7320, the Sequence IIIG engine test method. These aged oils are then tested for kinematic viscosity and for low-temperature pumpability properties as described in the Sequence IIIGA engine test, Appendix X1 of Test Method D7320. 1.2 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.2.1 Exceptions—There are no SI equivalents for some apparatus in Section 6, and there are some figures where inch units are to be regarded as standard. 1.3 This test method is arranged as follows: Section Scope 1 Reference Documents 2 Terminology 3 Summary of Test Method 4 Significance and Use 5 Apparatus 6 Reagents and Materials 7 Hazards 8 New and Existing Test Stand Calibration 9 Procedure 10 Cleaning 11 Calculations and Determination of Test Results 12 Report 13 Precision and Bias 14 Keywords 15 Annexes ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Organization Annex A1 ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Calibration Procedures Annex A2 ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Maintenance Activities Annex A3 ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Related Information Annex A4 Reaction Vessel Annex A5 Reaction Vessel Head Annex A6 Reaction Vessel-to-Head Seal Annex A7 Agitator Turbine Blade Annex A8 Agitator Packing Gland Annex A9 Nitrogen Dioxide Graduated Tube Annex A10 Vacuum System Plumbing Annex A11 Vacuum Trap Condensers Annex A12 Setting the Vacuum Control Valve Annex A13 Appendixes Sample Preparation and Addition Appendix X1 Charging the Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide Appendix X2 Nitrogen Dioxide Precision Needle Valve Appendix X3 Example of an Assembled ROBO Apparatus Appendix X4 Information Package to Aid Setting Up a New Robo Apparatus Appendix X5 Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide in Air Option Information Appendix X6 Time-Averaged Subsurface Air Flow Rate Appendix X7 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific warning statements are given in Sections 7 and 8. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 This bench test method is intended to produce comparable oil aging characteristics to those obtained with ASTM TMC Sequence IIIGA matrix reference oils 434, 435, and 438 after aging in the Sequence IIIG engine test. 5.2 To the extent that the method generates aged oils comparable to those from the Sequence IIIG engine test, the measured increases in kinematic and MRV viscosity indicate the tendency of an oil to thicken because of volatilization and oxidation, as in the Sequence IIIG and IIIGA (see Appendix X1 in Test Method D7320) engine tests, respectively. 5.3 This bench test procedure has potential use in specifications and classifications of engine lubricating oils, such as Specification D4485. 5.4 The results of this test method are valid when seeking qualification of oils against published specifications only when run on a test stand that has successfully met the calibration requirements specified under the TMC’s ROBO test monitoring program. SCOPE 1.1 This test method describes a bench procedure to simulate the oil aging encountered in Test Method D7320, the Sequence IIIG engine test method. These aged oils are then tested for kinematic viscosity and for low-temperature pumpability properties as described in the Sequence IIIGA engine test, Appendix X1 of Test Method D7320. 1.2 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.2.1 Exceptions—There are no SI equivalents for some apparatus in Section 6, and there are some figures where inch units are to be regarded as standard. 1.3 This test method is arranged as follows: Section Scope 1 Reference Documents 2 Terminology 3 Summary of Test Method 4 Significance and Use 5 Apparatus 6 Reagents and Materials 7 Hazards 8 New and Existing Test Stand Calibration 9 Procedure 10 Cleaning 11 Calculations and Determination of Test Results 12 Report 13 Precision and Bias 14 Keywords 15 Annexes ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Organization Annex A1 ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Calibration Procedures Annex A2 ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Maintenance Activities Annex A3 ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Related Information Annex A4 Reaction Vessel Annex A5 Reaction Vessel Head Annex A6 Reaction Vessel-to-Head Seal Annex A7 Agitator Turbine Blade Annex A8 Agitator Packing Gland Annex A9 Nitrogen Dioxide Graduated Tube Annex A10 Vacuum System Plumbing Annex A11 Vacuum Trap Condensers Annex A12 Setting the Vacuum Control Valve Annex A13 Appendixes Sample Preparation and Addition Appendix X1 Charging the Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide Appendix X2 Nitrogen Dioxide Precision Needle Valve Appendix X3 Example of an Assembled ROBO Apparatus Appendix X4 Information Package to Aid Setting Up a New Robo Apparatus Appendix X5 Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide in Air Option Information Appendix X6 Time-Averaged Subsurface Air Flow Rate Appendix X7 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific warning statements are given in Sections 7 and 8. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

ASTM D7528-22 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 75.100 - Lubricants, industrial oils and related products. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ASTM D7528-22 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM D445-24, ASTM D4175-23a, ASTM D445-23, ASTM D4175-23e1, ASTM D5293-20, ASTM D4485-18, ASTM D7320-17a, ASTM D5293-17e1, ASTM D5293-17, ASTM D7320-17, ASTM D4485-16, ASTM D445-16, ASTM D7320-16a, ASTM D7320-16, ASTM D7320-15a. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ASTM D7528-22 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: D7528 − 22
Standard Test Method for
Bench Oxidation of Engine Oils by ROBO Apparatus
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D7528; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
This test method is written for use by laboratories that make use ofASTM Test Monitoring Center
(TMC) services (see Annex A1 – Annex A4).
TheTMCprovidesreferenceoils,andengineeringandstatisticalservicestolaboratoriesthatdesire
to produce test results that are statistically similar to those produced by laboratories previously
calibrated by the TMC.
In general, the Test Purchaser decides if a calibrated test stand is to be used. Organizations such as
theAmericanChemistryCouncilrequirethatalaboratoryutilizetheTMCservicesaspartoftheirtest
registration process. In addition, the American Petroleum Institute and the Gear Lubricant Review
Committee of the Lubricant Review Institute (SAE International) require that a laboratory use the
TMC services in seeking qualification of oils against their specifications.
The advantage of using the TMC services to calibrate test stands is that the test laboratory (and
hence theTest Purchaser) has an assurance that the test stand was operating at the proper level of test
severity. It should also be borne in mind that results obtained in a non-calibrated test stand may not
be the same as those obtained in a test stand participating in the ASTM TMC services process.
1. Scope* 1.3 This test method is arranged as follows:
Section
1.1 This test method describes a bench procedure to simu-
Scope 1
late the oil aging encountered in Test Method D7320, the
Reference Documents 2
Sequence IIIG engine test method. These aged oils are then Terminology 3
Summary of Test Method 4
tested for kinematic viscosity and for low-temperature pump-
Significance and Use 5
ability properties as described in the Sequence IIIGA engine
Apparatus 6
test, Appendix X1 of Test Method D7320.
Reagents and Materials 7
Hazards 8
1.2 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded
New and Existing Test Stand Calibration 9
Procedure 10
asstandard.Nootherunitsofmeasurementareincludedinthis
Cleaning 11
standard.
Calculations and Determination of Test Results 12
1.2.1 Exceptions—There are no SI equivalents for some
Report 13
Precision and Bias 14
apparatus in Section 6, and there are some figures where inch
Keywords 15
units are to be regarded as standard.
Annexes
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Organization Annex A1
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Calibration Procedures Annex A2
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Maintenance Activities Annex A3
Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants and is the direct responsibility of
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Related Information Annex A4
Subcommittee D02.B0.07 on Development and Surveillance of Bench Tests
Reaction Vessel Annex A5
Methods. Reaction Vessel Head Annex A6
Current edition approved April 1, 2022. Published April 2022. Originally Reaction Vessel-to-Head Seal Annex A7
Agitator Turbine Blade Annex A8
approved in 2009. Last previous edition approved in 2021 as D7528–21. DOI:
Agitator Packing Gland Annex A9
10.1520/D7528-22.
Nitrogen Dioxide Graduated Tube Annex A10
Until the next revision of this test method, the ASTM Test Monitoring Center
Vacuum System Plumbing Annex A11
will update changes in the test method by means of information letters. Information
Vacuum Trap Condensers Annex A12
letters may be obtained from the ASTM Test Monitoring Center, 203 Armstrong
Setting the Vacuum Control Valve Annex A13
Drive, Freeport, PA 16229, www.astmtmc.org. Attention: Director. This edition
Appendixes
incorporates revisions in all information letters through No. 21-1.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D7528 − 22
to evaluate other materials (such as seals) that interact with
Section
Sample Preparation and Addition Appendix X1
oils. D4175
Charging the Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide Appendix X2
Nitrogen Dioxide Precision Needle Valve Appendix X3
3.1.4 test oil, n—any oil subjected to evaluation in an
Example of an Assembled ROBO Apparatus Appendix X4
established procedure. D4175
Information Package to Aid Setting Up a New Robo Apparatus Appendix X5
Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide in Air Option Information Appendix X6
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
Time-Averaged Subsurface Air Flow Rate Appendix X7
3.2.1 aged oil, n—atestoilafterithasbeensubjectedtothe
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
40h aging process in a ROBO apparatus.
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
3.3 Acronyms:
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter- 3.3.1 ROBO, n—Romaszewski Oil Bench Oxidation
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Specific warning statements are given in Sections 7 and 8. 4. Summary of Test Method
1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-
4.1 The test oil is combined with a small amount of iron
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
ferrocene catalyst and placed in a 1L reaction vessel. That
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
mixtureisstirredandheatedfor40hat170ºCwithairflowing
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
across the liquid surface under negative pressure. In addition,
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
nitrogen dioxide and air are introduced below the reaction
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
surface. After cooling, the oxidized, concentrated test oil is
subjected to pertinent viscometric tests. Evaporated oil is
2. Referenced Documents
condensed in order to weigh it and calculate evaporative loss.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D445Test Method for Kinematic Viscosity of Transparent
5. Significance and Use
and Opaque Liquids (and Calculation of DynamicViscos-
5.1 This bench test method is intended to produce compa-
ity)
rable oil aging characteristics to those obtained with ASTM
D4175Terminology Relating to Petroleum Products, Liquid
TMC Sequence IIIGAmatrix reference oils 434, 435, and 438
Fuels, and Lubricants
after aging in the Sequence IIIG engine test.
D4485Specification for Performance ofActiveAPI Service
Category Engine Oils
5.2 To the extent that the method generates aged oils
D4684Test Method for Determination of Yield Stress and
comparable to those from the Sequence IIIG engine test, the
Apparent Viscosity of Engine Oils at Low Temperature
measured increases in kinematic and MRV viscosity indicate
D5293Test Method for Apparent Viscosity of Engine Oils
the tendency of an oil to thicken because of volatilization and
and Base Stocks Between –10°C and –35°C Using
oxidation,asintheSequenceIIIGandIIIGA(seeAppendixX1
Cold-Cranking Simulator
in Test Method D7320) engine tests, respectively.
D7320Test Method for Evaluation of Automotive Engine
5.3 This bench test procedure has potential use in specifi-
Oils in the Sequence IIIG, Spark-Ignition Engine
cations and classifications of engine lubricating oils, such as
2.2 SAE Standard:
Specification D4485.
SAE J300Engine Oil Viscosity Classification
5.4 The results of this test method are valid when seeking
qualificationofoilsagainstpublishedspecificationsonlywhen
3. Terminology
run on a test stand that has successfully met the calibration
3.1 Definitions:
requirements specified under the TMC’s ROBO test monitor-
3.1.1 candidate oil, n—an oil that is intended to have the
ing program.
performance characteristics necessary to satisfy a specification
and is to be tested against that specification. D4175
6. Apparatus
3.1.2 non-reference oil, n—anyoilotherthanareferenceoil,
6.1 Balances:
suchasaresearchformulation,commercialoilorcandidateoil.
D4175 6.1.1 Analytical Balance—Capable of weighing 200 g with
a minimum indication resolution of 0.1 g.
3.1.3 reference oil, n—an oil of known performance
6.1.2 Analytical Balance—Capableofweighing0.1gwitha
characteristics, used as a basis for comparison.
minimum indication resolution of 0.001 g.
3.1.3.1 Discussion—Reference oils are used to calibrate
testing facilities, to compare the performance of other oils, or
6.2 Fume Hood, that vents to the outside atmosphere (see
Section 8).
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Kinker, B. G., Romaszewski, R. A., and Palmer, P. A., “ROBO–A Bench
the ASTM website. ProceduretoReplaceSequenceIIIGAEngineTest,” Journal of ASTM International
Available from SAE International, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA (JAI), Vol 4, No. 10, 2007, Paper ID JAI 100916. Available online from
15096-0001, http://www.sae.org. www.astm.org.
D7528 − 22
6.3 Reaction Vessel (ACE Glass, Inc. part number with a valve to switch between the two gas sources. The
6,7
D120676), a1L,thick-walledglassvesselhavinganominal volume fraction of nitrogen dioxide in air needed is 1.13%.
100mminnerdiameterandwithabottom,sample/drainvalve. See Appendix X6 for how this is derived.The volume fraction
8,7
The lower half has an Instatherm coating, rated at approxi- as certified by the supplier must fall in the range of 1.07% to
mately400W,forheatingthetestmixture.Adiagramisshown 1.19%.
NOTE1—Astheamountoftestoilremainingattheendofthetestisnot
in Fig. A5.1.
always known at the beginning of the test, it is advisable to configure the
6.4 Vessel Head—Thevesselheadisastainlesssteelplateof
dry-air tube location such that the opening of the tube is as close to the
sufficient diameter to completely cover the lower glass vessel agitator and as close to the bottom of the reactor as practical (without
contacting the agitator or blocking the tube opening).
and provide ample material for a sturdy mounting system.
9,7
Reimel Machine, Inc. part number RMI-1002-DH has been
6.8 Nitrogen Dioxide Delivery System—There are two op-
shown to be suitable for this application. The vessel head may
tions for adding nitrogen dioxide. One uses liquid nitrogen
also be constructed as described in AnnexA6. Users may also
dioxide and the other uses dilute nitrogen dioxide in air.
source some parts from Reimel Machine, Inc. and some
6.8.1 Graduated Tube for Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide (Ace
6,7
in-house.Ensuretheplatehasacenterholeforanagitatorshaft
Glass, Inc., part number D120677), 12mL capacity, with
and threaded ports to allow filling and for the attachment of
0.1mL graduations and having appropriate provisions for
air/nitrogen dioxide lines, vacuum control and relief valves,
connection to the reaction vessel’s subsurface gas delivery
and a temperature probe. Fig. A6.1 defines the locations of
system—see AnnexA10 for more details. By receiving liquid
these ports. Mill the bottom surface of this stainless steel plate
phase nitrogen dioxide from a gas bottle, this tube allows
to accept a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) ring seal for cen-
measurement of nitrogen dioxide depletion from the tube over
tered attachment of the glass vessel as described in AnnexA7.
the course of the reaction.This graduated tube is only used for
9,7
Reimel Machine, Inc. part number RMI-1007-DH has been
the liquid nitrogen dioxide option.
found suitable for this purpose.
6.8.2 Gas Cylinder Containing Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide in
Air—Secondgassourceusingdilutenitrogendioxideindryair
6.5 Stirrer Motor—An electric motor with drill chuck collet
as defined in 6.7.2. This is only used for the dilute nitrogen
capable of sustained operation at 200 r/min 6 5 r/min.
dioxide option.
6.6 Stirrer—An 8mm diameter stainless steel rod, 300mm
6.9 Temperature Control System—A controller and probe
longwithameansofattachingabladeassemblyatthebottom.
capable of being programmed to control reaction temperature
Theturbinebladeassemblydiameteris2.58in.(65.5mm)with
via low output wattage at or below 40Vac and with an
1.4mm thick blades attached at a 45° pitch with an overall
operational hysteresis of 0.1°C using an on/off algorithm.
blade height of 0.985 in. (25.0 mm). Construct the stirrer as
Alternatively, a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) algo-
described in Annex A8. Reimel Machine, Inc. part number
9,7
rithm may also be used. Position the temperature probe tip so
RMI-1001-DH has been found suitable for this purpose.
that it is level with the bottom of the turbine blade with a
6.6.1 Attach the stirrer to the reactor head by means of a
distanceof8mmbetweentheprobecenterandthebladeedge.
packing gland constructed as described in Annex A9. Reimel
9,7
6.9.1 Asthetemperaturemaynotbeuniformthroughoutthe
Machine, Inc. part number RMI-1004-DH has been found
reactor, it is important from the point of view of precision that
suitable for this purpose.Attach the stirrer to the stirrer motor
the temperature is always monitored and controlled at the
by inserting the 8mm steel rod through the opening in the
specified position inside the reactor. When reassembling the
reactor head and the packing gland, and insert PTFE rope
reactorforanewrun,repositiontheprobe,ifnecessary,asitis
packing to create a seal.
easily bent.
6.6.2 Positiontheblade6mmfromthebottomofthevessel.
6.10 Flow Meters:
6.7 Air Supply System—A gas source capable of delivering
6.10.1 Acrylic Block Airflow Meter (King Instrument Co.,
anuninterruptedflowofdryairintothetestoilviaasubsurface
10,7
7520 Series, Order number 2C-17), having a scale of 0.4 to
feedthroughoutthereactiontimeperiod.Anin-line,desiccant-
4 Standard Cubic Feet per Minute (SCFM), with ⁄4 in. NPT
charged, drying system has been found suitable.
threaded female pipe end. It is used for measuring air flow in
6.7.1 Ensure the subsurface feed tube opening remains
10.3.2.The machined fitting for the top of the flow meter shall
below the surface of the test fluid for the duration of the test.
accommodate the vacuum line from the condenser to the
Do not place the tube in the drain area of the reaction flask.
reactor with a ⁄8 in. inside diameter or larger. The machined
6.7.2 A second gas source consisting of a gas cylinder
fitting for the bottom of the flow meter shall accommodate the
containing dilute nitrogen dioxide in air may be added along
⁄4 in. vacuum control valve.
NOTE 2—SCFM is the volumetric flow rate of a gas corrected to
standardized conditions of temperature, pressure, and relative humidity,
The sole source of supply of the apparatus known to the committee at this time
thus representing a precise mass flow rate. However, the definitions of
is Ace Glass, Inc., P.O. Box 688, 1430 NW Blvd., Vineland, NJ 08362-0688.
standardconditionsvary.Inthismethod,theflowmeteriscalibratedwith
If you are aware of alternative suppliers, please provide this information to
ASTM. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the air at standard conditions defined as a temperature of 70°F, a pressure of
responsible technical committee which you may attend.
InstathermisaregisteredtrademarkofAceGlass,Inc.,P.O.Box688,1430NW
Blvd., Vineland, NJ 08362-0688.
9 10
The sole source of supply of the apparatus known to the committee at this time Thesolesourceofsupplyoftheapparatusknowntothecommitteeatthistime
is Reimel Machine, Inc., 2575 Wyandotte Rd., Willow Grove, PA 19090. is King Instrument Co., 12700 Pala Drive Garden Grove, CA 92841.
D7528 − 22
14.6 psia and 0% relative humidity.
7.1.1 Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide (Used with the Option in
6.8.1)—Produces a reddish-brown gas with a pungent odor.
6.10.2 Airflow Meter, with a scale calibrated in mL/min for
(Warning—VERYTOXIC if inhaled or ingested. Explosive if
measuring subsurface airflow of 185 mL/min in 10.3.1 and
mixed with combustible material. Irritating to eyes and respi-
10.3.2. Two air flow meters may be used in the dilute nitrogen
ratory system. Danger of very serious irreversible health
dioxide configuration depending on the location of the switch-
effects.).
ing valve.
7.1.2 Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide in Air (Used with the Option
6.10.2.1 Adigital mass flow controller may also be used to
in 6.8.2)—(Warning—Compared to liquid nitrogen dioxide,
measure and control the flow rate. This type of flow controller
the exposure risk is greatly reduced, but not negligible.)
is recommended, but not required, for the dilute nitrogen
dioxide in air option.
7.2 Iron Ferrocene—98% or higher purity. (Warning—Do
not breathe dust. Harmful if swallowed.)
6.11 Vacuum System—A pump with a free air capability of
at least 160 L/min is required to ensure a constant air flow
7.3 Oil—100 Neutral, API Group II, for mixing with iron
across the reaction surface in the vessel of 2.0SCFM 6
ferrocene catalyst.
0.1SCFM with 61 kPa vacuum for 40 h. Instructions for
7.4 Cleaning Solvent—Commercialheptanes,orsimilarsol-
constructing the vacuum plumbing for the vessel are given in
vents that evaporate without leaving a residue, are suitable.
AnnexA11.As explained in AnnexA11, it is critical to follow
(Warning—flammable.)
these instructions precisely.
7.5 Acetone—A technical grade of acetone is suitable pro-
6.12 Vacuum Control Valve—A stainless steel needle valve
videditdoesnotleavearesidueuponevaporation.Thisisused
with ⁄4 in. outside diameter tube connections and a flow
forafinalcleaningrinse.Acetonewilldegradefluoroelastomer
coefficient (Cv) of 0.37 has been found suitable for this
seals and can dissolve or deteriorate acrylics. (Warning—
application.
flammable.)
6.13 Vacuum Trap System—Supplies coolant at an inlet
7.6 Dry Air—Desiccated air is suitable.
temperature <20 °C to the vacuum trap condensers in order to
7.7 Reference Oils—The current TMC reference oils are
removevaporsfromtheeffluentpriortoentering(andpossibly
required for setting up the ROBO apparatus test stand (see
damaging) the vacuum system and has a means of recovering
Section 9). The TMC maintains and distributes these oils.
the distillate for weighing. Redundant (serial) condensers are
These oils are formulated or selected to represent specific
beneficial as long as the required airflow across the reaction
chemical types or performance levels, or both. See A2.4 for
surfaceismaintained.AnnexA12providesinformationontwo
additional information regarding reference oils.
systems that have been found to be satisfactory.
7.7.1 The TMC is responsible for managing a system that
6.14 Time Controller—Atiming device accurate to 1 min is
ensures the performance and formulation consistency of the
used to deactivate the heat source.
reference oils. Store the reference oils in locations where the
6.15 Precision Needle Valve, having a low Cv for precise ambient temperature does not exceed 32 °C. Under these
controloftheflowofnitrogendioxide.Examplesofvalvesthat
conditions, the expected shelf life of a reference oil is five
have been found satisfactory are given in Appendix X3. This years. In some circumstances, however, the TMC may specify
valve is used with the liquid nitrogen dioxide option in 6.8.1. a shelf life longer than five years. In such cases, theTMC uses
It is not required for the dilute nitrogen dioxide option documentedanalysisprocedurestojustifythelongershelflife.
described in 6.8.2.
7.7.2 Unless specifically authorized by the TMC, do not
analyze TMC reference oils, either physically or chemically.
6.16 Beaker—300mL capacity.
The testing laboratory tacitly agrees to use the TMC reference
6.17 Glass Jar—250mL capacity which can be sealed.
oils exclusively in accordance with the TMC’s published
Policies for Use andAnalysis ofASTM Reference Oils, and to
6.18 Shaker—Use either a reciprocal or an elliptical shaker.
run and report the reference oil test according to TMC
6.19 Assembled ROBO Apparatus—Fig. X4.1 shows an
guidelines.
example of an assembled ROBO apparatus. However, because
NOTE3—PoliciesfortheUseandAnalysisofASTMReferenceOilsare
it is assembled from different components, some of which are
available from the TMC.
site specific (for example, geometry of fume hood, local safety
considerations, use of different parts such as temperature
8. Hazards
controllers,andsoforth),thereisnostandardROBOapparatus
assembly. As an aid to building and setting up a new ROBO 8.1 Specific Hazards—Duetonitrogendioxidetoxicity,with
apparatus, a package of information is available on the TMC the exception of weighing, perform steps 10.3 – 10.8 of the
website. This (non-mandatory) information supplements that procedure in the fume hood. See also 7.1.
giveninSection6.Anindextothecontentsofthisinformation
package is given in Appendix X5.
9. New and Existing Test Stand Calibration
9.1 New Test Stand at New Test Laboratory Calibration—
7. Reagents and Materials
For new ROBO apparatus at existing laboratory, proceed to
7.1 Nitrogen Dioxide: 9.2. For existing ROBO apparatus test stands, proceed to 9.3.
D7528 − 22
9.1.1 Obtain the required, current reference oils from the 9.3.1.2 Initial calibration verification of a new test stand or
TMC for the purpose of setting up a new ROBO apparatus repeated consecutive unacceptable calibration verifications on
stand. (See 7.7.2 and Annex A2 for conditions of use for the a test stand requires passing two consecutive TMC reference
TMC reference oils.) oil tests.
9.1.2 Test the assigned reference oils according to the 9.3.1.3 The same nitrogen dioxide delivery configuration
procedure described in Section 10. must be used to re-verify the calibration status and then
9.1.2.1 Itisimperativethatthevacuumcontrolvalve(VCV) continued to be used for subsequent certified runs.
setpositionbesetonthefirstset-uptestandnotchangedagain 9.3.1.4 Certain operational changes to the test stand, as
for subsequent set-up qualifying runs. specified in the TMC calibration requirements, voids the
9.1.2.2 If the VCV set position is changed by more than TMC test stand calibration status and requires passing two
60.125 revolutions after the start of the first qualifying set-up consecutiveTMCreferenceoilteststore-verifythecalibration
test run, all previous tests in the set-up test sequence are void; status of the modified test stand.
repeat the test stand setup runs from 9.1.1 – 9.1.4. 9.3.1.5 Duringthetimeofconductingareferenceoilteston
9.1.3 Determine the viscometric properties of the aged one test stand, non-reference oil tests may be conducted on
reference oils as described in Section 12 and report according other previously calibrated stands.
to Section 13.
9.3.2 Test Numbering:
9.1.4 Report test results to the TMC using the standardized
9.3.2.1 The test number shall follow the format AAA-BB-
reporting protocols (see 9.3.3 and Section 13). Be sure to
CCCC. AAA represents the test stand identification. BB repre-
include all required operational parameters as defined in the sentsthenumberoftestssincelastreference. CCCCrepresents
reporting protocol data dictionary.
thetotalnumberoftestsonthestand.Asanexample,6-10-175
9.1.5 Review all initial set-up results on new instruments represents the 175 test on Stand 6 and the tenth test since the
and receive approval from the TMC.
lastreference.Consecutivelynumberalltestsonagivenstand.
9.1.5.1 Test results will be posted to the TMC website. Lab
9.3.3 Reporting of Reference Oil Test Results—Report the
identification will be coded by the TMC for confidentiality of
results of all reference oil tests to the TMC according to the
the testing laboratory.
following instructions:
9.1.6 If all the required test stand set-up runs meet the
9.3.3.1 Transmit results according to the ROBO Standard-
current, approved ROBO TMC calibration requirements
ized Report Forms and Data Dictionary to the TMC within
(both operationally and statistically), the TMC will notify the
five days of test completion via electronic data transfer
laboratorythatitcanproceedwithcalibratingtheteststandper
protocol as outlined in the Data Communication Committee,
9.3.
Electronic Test Report Transmission Model (ETRTM).
9.1.7 If the TMC’s review determines that the required test
NOTE 4—Be sure to collect data on all the required parameters defined
stand set-up runs do not collectively meet the approved
in the ROBO Standardized Data Dictionary (see Section 13). Validity
requirements (both operationally and statistically), the TMC
evaluation of test results cannot be made if critical evaluation parameters
willnotifythelaboratorythatadditionaladjustmentsneedtobe are missing.
made to the test stand and one or more of the set-up runs will
9.3.4 Evaluation of Reference Oil Test Results—The TMC
have to be repeated.
evaluates the referenceoil test results for both operational
9.2 New Test Stand at Existing Laboratory Calibration: validity and statistical acceptability. The TMC may consult
with the test laboratory in case of difficulty, as follows:
9.2.1 Laboratory can proceed with calibrating the test stand
per 9.3. 9.3.4.1 Uponreceiptofthereferenceoiltestresultsfromthe
test laboratory, the TMC evaluates the laboratory’s reported
9.3 Existing Test Stand Calibration:
operational parameters for compliance with the current test
9.3.1 Reference Oil Test Frequency—TheTMCrequirestest
method. For operationally valid tests, the TMC then evaluates
stands to pass periodic calibration verification with reference
the pass/fail parameters for statistical validity.TheTMC sends
oils supplied by the TMC. These calibration verification runs
a test confirmation report to the test laboratory indicating the
are typically run on blind-coded reference oil samples.
overallvalidityofthecalibrationtestresults,anddisclosingthe
9.3.1.1 Prior to conducting a TMC reference oil test for the
non-blind industry reference oil code.
purpose of stand calibration, procure a supply of reference oil
9.3.4.2 Intheeventthereferenceoiltestisunacceptable,the
directly from the TMC. (See 7.7.2 and Annex A2 for condi-
test laboratory shall provide an explanation of the problem
tions of use for theTMC reference oils.)The reference oils are
relating to the failure. If the problem is not obvious, carry out
usually supplied directly to a testing laboratory with blind-
operational re-checks (instrumentations, settings, and proce-
coded identification numbers to ensure that the laboratory is
dures). Following the re-checks, the TMC assigns another
not influenced by prior knowledge of a reference oil’s accept-
reference oil for testing by the laboratory. If this reference oil
ableperformanceresultsinassessingthetestresults.TheTMC
will determine which specific reference oil or oils the labora-
tory shall test in accordance with the calibration requirements.
The ROBO Standardized Report Forms and Data Dictionary specification is
available at: ftp://ftp.astmtmc.org/datadict/robo/current/.
The Data Communication Committee, Electronic Test Report Transmission
The ROBO LTMS Calibration Requirements document is available at: Model (ETRTM) document is available at: ftp://ftp.astmtmc.org/docs/
http://www.astmtmc.org/ftp/docs/ltms/ltms.pdf. datacommunicationscommittee/electronic_test_report_transmission_specification/.
D7528 − 22
NOTE 6—Steps 10.5.1 – 10.5.3 may be carried out in any order or
test is unacceptable, a reassessment of the stand setup as
simultaneously.
described in 9.1 or 9.2 may be necessary.
9.3.4.3 It is recognized that a certain percentage of calibra- 10.5.1 Sample Preparation—Introduce 3.0g 6 0.1g of
tion tests will fall outside the acceptance limits because of the prepared iron ferrocene catalyst solution and 197.0g 6 1.0g
application of statistics in the development of the acceptance test oil to the reaction vessel. See Appendix X1 for suggested
limits. The TMC decides, with consultation as needed with mixingprocedures.Ifthedirectweighingprocedure(X1.1.2)is
industry experts (testing laboratories, members of the ASTM used, do the vessel seal check (10.3) and the preset vacuum
Technical Guidance Committee, the surveillance panel, and so flow (10.4) procedure after the apparatus is reassembled.
forth), whether the reason for any failure of a reference oil test
NOTE 7—The total mass of oil in the reactor is 200g 6 1.0g (197.0g
is a false alarm, testing apparatus, testing laboratory, or
6 1.0g from the test oil and 3.0 g from the catalyst solution).
industry-related problem. The ROBO surveillance panel adju-
10.5.1.1 Start the stirrer motor and agitate at 200r⁄min 6
dicates all industry problems.
5r⁄min.
9.3.5 Reference Oil Accountability:
10.5.2 Make the electrical connections to the heater.
9.3.5.1 Laboratories conducting calibration tests are re-
(Warning—To avoid electric shock and possible ignition
quired to provide a full accounting of the identification and
spark, check that the power is de-energized before making
quantities of all reference oils used.
electrical connections.)
9.3.5.2 With the exception of analysis required in this test
10.5.3 Charging Nitrogen Dioxide:
method, no additional physical or chemical analysis of new or
10.5.3.1 Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide Option Only—Transfer
usedreferenceoilsispermittedwithouttheexpresspermission
2.0mL 6 0.1mLof liquid nitrogen dioxide (see Section 8 and
oftheTMC.(See7.7.2andAnnexA2forconditionsofusefor
warning in 7.1) into the graduated tube. See Appendix X2 for
the TMC reference oils.)
examples of how the transfer may be made.
10.5.3.2 Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide Option Only—Theamount
10. Procedure
of nitrogen dioxide introduced can be calculated. An amount
10.1 Vacuum Control Valve Setting—For a new ROBO
equivalent to 2.0mL 6 0.1mL of liquid nitrogen dioxide is
apparatus test stand, set the vacuum control valve as described
required. See Appendix X6 for example calculation.
in AnnexA13. The control valve setting is critical as it affects
10.6 Oil Aging:
the severity of the test. For all subsequent runs involving test
10.6.1 General—Begin the oil aging by setting the time and
oils, use exactly the same control valve setting to that used
temperature and turning on the vacuum.
during the last successful TMC calibration verification run.
10.6.1.1 Complete steps 10.6.2 – 10.6.5 within 1 min; the
10.2 Catalyst Preparation:
order in which they are carried out is not important.
10.2.1 Weigh 0.1g 6 0.001g of iron ferrocene (see warn-
10.6.2 Setthetimecontrollerto40htoinitiatetheoilaging.
ingin7.2)intoanappropriatecontainersuchasa250mLglass
10.6.3 Set the temperature controller to 170 °C and com-
jar.
mence heating.
10.2.2 Add 99.9g 6 0.1g ofAPI Group II 100 Neutral oil
10.6.4 Adjust the temperature controller voltage output to
to obtain 0.100% 6 0.001% (mass) iron ferrocene.
25V to 40V.
10.2.3 Mix thoroughly, until the catalyst is completely in
10.6.5 Turn the vacuum system on.
solution as determined by a lack of visible particles.
10.6.6 Start the nitrogen dioxide flow.
NOTE 5—This may take 1h or more.
10.6.6.1 Fortheliquidnitrogendioxideoption,immediately
10.3 Vessel Seal Check: after the previous steps, adjust the nitrogen dioxide precision
needle valve to allow introduction of nitrogen dioxide in a
10.3.1 Startsubsurfacedry-airflowatarateof185mL/min.
controlled and gradual manner into the inlet flow stream.
10.3.2 Onanassembledvessel,installtheacrylicblockflow
Ensure that the nitrogen dioxide is completely depleted from
meter between the top connection of the vacuum control valve
the tube and introduced into the reactor within 12h 61h.
and the vacuum source.Apply vacuum to the vessel and block
10.6.6.2 Because changes to the nitrogen dioxide flow rate
thevacuumrelieforificelongenoughtoassurethesystemwill
attain 85 kPa with a subsurface airflow of 185 mL/min. can affect precision, it is imperative that nitrogen dioxide be
introduced to the reactor in a controlled and gradual manner.
10.3.2.1 Theacrylicblockairflowmetershallreadlessthan
Using a flow rate target of 0.167 mL/h, monitor nitrogen
0.6 SCFM.
dioxide depletion closely in the first 2h to 4h, the aim being
10.4 Preset Vacuum Flow—Withthevacuumstillappliedto
to introduce 0.5mL during that time period. Introduce the
the vessel, set the air flow through the reactor to 2.0SCFM 6
remaining 1.5mLat a similar flow rate, ensuring that the total
0.1SCFM by bleeding air, if needed, into the vacuum line
of 2.0mLis delivered between 11h and 13h.Arun is invalid
between the vacuum source and the condenser. Maintain the
if the flow of nitrogen dioxide exceeds 0.5mL during any 1h
vacuum pressure at 61kPa 6 1.7kPa by adjusting the vacuum
period.
reliefvalve.Oncetheseparametersareset,shutoffthevacuum
10.6.6.3 For the dilute nitrogen dioxide option, switch to
and remove the acrylic block flow meter from the system.
dilutenitrogendioxidefor12.0h.Arunisinvalidiftheflowof
10.5 Sample Preparation and Charging Nitrogen Dioxide: dilute nitrogen dioxide in air deviates from the required
D7528 − 22
185mL⁄min by more than 6% during at any of the observa- 11.3 Clean the underside of the reactor cap and all shafts or
tions.At least 6 observations during the first 6h of the air flow probes protruding downward into the vessel with cleaning
must be made and recorded with the last observation being solvent and a lightweight, lint-free towel. Rinse with acetone.
madeatabout6h.Theairflowmaybeadjustedatthesetimes.
11.4 Ensure that subsurface air supply lines are clear, then
If all of the readings before adjustments are within 5% of
clean them with cleaning solvent and reassemble when dry.
185mL⁄min,thennomoreobservationsarerequired.Iftheair
11.5 Clean the acrylic block flow meter with cleaning
flow deviates by more than 4% during the first 6h, then six
solvent. Do not use acetone which can dissolve or deteriorate
more observations are required from hours 6 to 12. After
acrylics.
12.0h, switch back to the dry-air supply for the remainder of
the test.
12. Calculations and Determination of Test Results
10.6.6.4 If any deviations from 185mL⁄min of more than
12.1 Increase in Kinematic Viscosity at 40 °C:
2mL⁄min were observed (or calculated at the 12h switching
12.1.1 Calculate as follows:
time), then calculate and report the time-averaged flow rate.
See Appendix X7 for examples.
@KV~aged! 2KV~fresh!#
Percentviscosityincrease PVIS 5100
~ !
KV fresh
~ !
10.7 Shutdown:
(2)
10.7.1 Attheendofthe40hcycle,allowthesystemtocool
to room temperature while maintaining the airflow and agita-
where:
tion.
KV(aged) = kinematic viscosity, mm /s, at 40 °C of the
10.7.2 Turn off the vacuum. (The vacuum flow can be
aged oil as determined by Test Method D445,
turnedoffatanytimeaftercompletionofthe40hcycle.)Bleed
and
the pressure by opening a port, for example, the sample
KV(fresh) = kinematic viscosity, mm /s, at 40 °C of the
addition port. Drain the aged oil into a suitable container.
fresh oil as determined by Test Method D445.
10.8 Mass Percent Volatiles Collected:
12.2 Low-Temperature Viscometric Properties:
10.8.1 Drain the condensed liquid from the vacuum trap
12.2.1 UsingTest Method D5293, measure the Cold Crank-
system into a tared vessel. Determine and record the mass of
ing Simulator (CCS) viscosity of the ROBO-aged oil at the
the condensed liquid to the nearest 0.1 g.
temperature specified for the SAE W grade of the fresh oil.
This temperature can be found in the SAE J300 Viscosity
10.8.2 Calculate as follows:
Classification System (hereafter referred to as SAE J300).
M~volatiles!
Mass% volatiles, %m/m 5100 (1) 12.2.1.1 If the measured CCS viscosity is less than or equal
M fresh
~ !
to the maximum CCS viscosity specified in SAE J300 for the
where:
SAE W grade of the fresh oil, measure the MRV viscosity by
M(fresh) = 200 g = the mass of fresh oil added to the Test Method D4684 at the MRV temperature specified in SAE
reactor in 10.5.1, and J300 for the SAE W grade of the fresh oil.
M(volatiles) = mass, g, of condensate collected in 10.8.1.
12.2.1.2 If the measured CCS viscosity is higher than the
NOTE 8—The significance of the %volatiles parameter is under maximumCCSviscosityspecifiedinSAEJ300fortheSAEW
investigation.
viscosity grade of the fresh oil, measure the MRVviscosity by
Test Method D4684 at 5 °C higher than the MRV temperature
11. Cleaning
specified in SAE J300 for the original SAE W viscosity grade
of the fresh oil (that is, at the MRV temperature specified in
11.1 Clean the reaction vessel with cleaning solvent (see
SAE J300 for the next higher SAE W viscosity grade).
warning in 7.4).
11.1.1 Scrub any residual material off the glass surface
13. Report
while taking care not to scratch the inside of the vessel.
Perform a final rinse with acetone (see warning in 7.5). 13.1 Report Forms—For TMC reference oil tests, use the
standardized report form set and data dictionary.
11.2 Clean the vacuum control valve.
NOTE 9—Report the non-reference oil test results on these same forms
11.2.1 Flush the valve with cleaning solvent or carburetor
if the results are intended to be submitted as candidate oil results against
cleaner, followed with an acetone rinse to remove and avoid
a specification.
anycarbondepositsthatcouldreduceorplugthevalveorifice.
13.1.1 Report reference oil test results to the TMC accord-
11.2.2 Additional optional cleaning may be needed in cases
ing to the ETRTM protocols described in 9.3.3.1.
where there is insufficient vacuum flow (see 10.4). If vacuum
flow is sufficient, skip to step 11.3. 13.2 Reporting Units—Report results in SI units.
11.2.2.1 Disassemble the valve and remove any carbon
13.3 Report the following:
deposits from the plug and inside seat of the valve body.
13.3.1 Kinematic viscosity at 40 °C, by Test Method D445,
11.2.2.2 Flush as in 11.2.1.
of the test oil before and after aging.
11.2.2.3 Reassemble the vacuum control valve, ensuring 13.3.1.1 Report to two decimal places for viscosities be-
2 2
thatthevalvesettingisatexactlythesamepositiontothatused tween 10mm /s and 100mm /s and to one decimal place for
during the last successful TMC calibration verification run. viscosities >100 mm /s.
D7528 − 22
A
TABLE 1 Test Precision
14.1.1 Intermediate Precision Conditions—Conditions
Intermediate Precision Reproducibility
wheretestresultsareobtainedwiththesametestmethodusing
Variable
B C B C
S i.p. S R
i.p. R the same oil, with changing conditions such as operators,
D
PVIS 0.191 0.535 0.267 0.748
measuring equipment, test apparatus, and time.
D
MRV viscosity 0.25 0.70 0.40 1.12
NOTE 10—Intermediate precision is the appropriate term for this test
A
These statistics are based on results obtained from an interlaboratory program
method, rather than repeatability, which defines more rigorous within-
inwhichsevensamplesweretestedinsevenlaboratoriesontentestrigs(see14).
laboratory conditions.
The samples consisted of SAE 5W-XX and 10W-30 multigrade engine oils
including ASTM Test Monitoring Center Reference Oils 434, 435, and 438.
14.1.1.1 Intermediate Precision Limit (i.p.)—The difference
B
S = Standard deviation.
C between two results obtained under intermediate precision
This value is obtained by multiplying the standard deviation by 2.8.
D
conditionsthatwouldinthelongrun,inthenormalandcorrect
The original units for PVIS are percent viscosity increase. The original units for
MRV viscosity are mPa·s. These parameters are transformed using ln(result).
conduct of the test method, exceed the values shown in Table
When comparing two test results on these parameters, first apply this transforma-
1 in only one case in twenty. When only a single test result is
tiontoeachtestresult.Comparetheabsolutedifferencebetweenthetransformed
results with the appropriate (intermediate precision or reproducibility) precision available, the Intermediate Precision Limit can be used to
limit.
calculate a range (test result 6 Intermediate Precision Limit)
outside of which a second test result would be expected to fall
about one time in twenty.
14.1.2 Reproducibility Conditions—Conditions where test
results are obtained with the same test method using the same
13.3.2 Percentincreaseinkinematicviscosityat40°Cafter
test oil in different laboratories with different operators using
aging (PVIS)—see 12.1.
different equipment.
13.3.2.1 Report to nearest 0.1%.
14.1.2.1 Reproducibility Limit (R)—The difference between
13.3.3 SAE W grade of the fresh oil.
two results obtained under reproducibility conditions that
13.3.4 The CCS viscosity and temperature of measurement
would,inthelongrun,inthenormalandcorrectconductofthe
of the ROBO-aged oil by Test Method D5293.
test method, exceed the values in Table 1 in only one case in
13.3.5 The MRV viscosity, yield stress and temperature of
twenty.
measurement of the aged oil by Test Method D4684—see
12.2.1.1 and 12.2.1.2. 14.2 Bias—No estimate of the bias for this procedure is
possible because the performance results for an oil are deter-
13.3.6 The option used to add nitrogen dioxide. Liquid
nitrogen dioxide or dilute nitrogen dioxide. mined only under the specific conditions of the test and no
absolute standards exist.
13.3.6.1 If the dilute nitrogen dioxide option was used,
calculate and report the total amount of nitrogen dioxide
14.3 Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide Option Effect on Precision
delivered to the reactor to the nearest one-tenth of a milliliter.
and Bias—The precision and bias in sections 14.1 and 14.2
were determined with the original liquid nitrogen dioxide
14. Precision and Bias
option.TheASTMROBOSurveillancePanelapprovedtheuse
of the dilute nitrogen dioxide option based on the limited data
14.1 Precision—The precision of this test method as deter-
obtained from which no effect on precision or bias was
minedbythestatisticalexaminationoftheinterlaboratorytests
detected.
results is given in Table 1.
15. Keywords
15.1 evaporative loss; low-temperature pumpability; MRV
Supporting data have been filed atASTM International Headquarters and may
viscosity; oil aging; oil oxidation; oil viscosity; ROBO test;
beobtainedbyrequestingResearchReportRR:D02-1660.ContactASTMCustomer
Service at service@astm.org. sequence IIIG test; sequence IIIGA test; volatiles
D7528 − 22
ANNEXES
(Mandatory Information)
A1. ASTM TEST MONITORING CENTER: ORGANIZATION
A1.1 The Test Monitoring Center (TMC), an affiliate of vested in the ASTM Test Monitoring System Executive
ASTM International, is a nonprofit organization located at 203 Committee, whose members are elected by Subcommittee
Armstrong Drive, Freeport, PA 16229. It is staffed to admin-
D02.B0. The TMC operates under its associated bylaws and
ister engineering studies; conduct laboratory visits; perform
regulations, the bylaws of Committee D02 and of Subcommit-
statistical analyses of test data; to blend, store, and ship
tee D02.B0, and the Rules and Regulations of theASTM Test
reference oils; and to provide associated administrative func-
Monitoring System. The operating income of the TMC is
tions connected with the referencing and calibration of various
obtainedfromfeesleviedonthereferenceoilssuppliedandon
lubricanttests.TheTMCmaintainsacloseconnectionwithtest
test reviews. These fees are set by the Test Monitoring Center
sponsors, test developers, the surveillance panels, and the
Board of Directors.
testing laboratories. The management of these functions is
A2. ASTM TEST MONITORING CENTER: CALIBRATION PROCEDURES
A2.1 Reference Oils—These oils are formulated or selected A2.4 Analysis of Reference Oil—Unless specifically autho-
to represent specific chemical, or performance levels, or both. rized by the TMC, do not analyze TMC reference oils, either
Theyareusuallysupplieddirectlytoatestinglaboratoryunder
physicallyorchemically.DonotresellASTMreferenceoilsor
codenumberstoensurethatthelaboratoryisnotinfluencedby
supply them to other laboratories without the approval of the
prior knowledge of acceptable results in assessing test results.
TMC. The reference oils are supplied only for the intended
The TMC determines the specific reference oil the laboratory
purpose of obtaining calibration under the ASTM Test Moni-
shall test.
toring System.Any unauthorized use is strictly forbidden. The
testing laboratory tacitly agrees to use the TMC
...


This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: D7528 − 21 D7528 − 22
Standard Test Method for
Bench Oxidation of Engine Oils by ROBO Apparatus
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D7528; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
This test method is written for use by laboratories that make use of ASTM Test Monitoring Center
(TMC) services (see Annex A1 – Annex A4).
The TMC provides reference oils, and engineering and statistical services to laboratories that desire
to produce test results that are statistically similar to those produced by laboratories previously
calibrated by the TMC.
In general, the Test Purchaser decides if a calibrated test stand is to be used. Organizations such as
the American Chemistry Council require that a laboratory utilize the TMC services as part of their test
registration process. In addition, the American Petroleum Institute and the Gear Lubricant Review
Committee of the Lubricant Review Institute (SAE International) require that a laboratory use the
TMC services in seeking qualification of oils against their specifications.
The advantage of using the TMC services to calibrate test stands is that the test laboratory (and
hence the Test Purchaser) has an assurance that the test stand was operating at the proper level of test
severity. It should also be borne in mind that results obtained in a non-calibrated test stand may not
be the same as those obtained in a test stand participating in the ASTM TMC services process.
1. Scope*
1.1 This test method describes a bench procedure to simulate the oil aging encountered in Test Method D7320, the Sequence IIIG
engine test method. These aged oils are then tested for kinematic viscosity and for low-temperature pumpability properties as
described in the Sequence IIIGA engine test, Appendix X1 of Test Method D7320.
1.2 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
standard.
1.2.1 Exceptions—There are no SI equivalents for some apparatus in Section 6, and there are some figures where inch units are
to be regarded as standard.
1.3 This test method is arranged as follows:
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
D02.B0.07 on Development and Surveillance of Bench Tests Methods.
Current edition approved Jan. 1, 2021April 1, 2022. Published January 2021April 2022. Originally approved in 2009. Last previous edition approved in 20172021 as
D7528 – 17a.D7528 – 21. DOI: 10.1520/D7528-21.10.1520/D7528-22.
Until the next revision of this test method, the ASTM Test Monitoring Center will update changes in the test method by means of information letters. Information letters
may be obtained from the ASTM Test Monitoring Center, 6555 Penn Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15206-4489. Attention: Administrator.203 Armstrong Drive, Freeport, PA 16229,
www.astmtmc.org. Attention: Director. This edition incorporates revisions in all information letters through No. 20-1.21-1.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D7528 − 22
Section
Scope 1
Reference Documents 2
Terminology 3
Summary of Test Method 4
Significance and Use 5
Apparatus 6
Reagents and Materials 7
Hazards 8
New and Existing Test Stand Calibration 9
Procedure 10
Cleaning 11
Calculations and Determination of Test Results 12
Report 13
Precision and Bias 14
Keywords 15
Annexes
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Organization Annex A1
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Calibration Procedures Annex A2
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Maintenance Activities Annex A3
ASTM Test Monitoring Center: Related Information Annex A4
Reaction Vessel Annex A5
Reaction Vessel Head Annex A6
Reaction Vessel-to-Head Seal Annex A7
Agitator Turbine Blade Annex A8
Agitator Packing Gland Annex A9
Nitrogen Dioxide Graduated Tube Annex A10
Vacuum System Plumbing Annex A11
Vacuum Trap Condensers Annex A12
Setting the Vacuum Control Valve Annex A13
Appendixes
Sample Preparation and Addition Appendix X1
Charging the Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide Appendix X2
Nitrogen Dioxide Precision Needle Valve Appendix X3
Example of an Assembled ROBO Apparatus Appendix X4
Information Package to Aid Setting Up a New Robo Apparatus Appendix X5
Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide in Air Option Information Appendix X6
Time-Averaged Subsurface Air Flow Rate Appendix X7
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific warning statements are given in Sections 7 and 8.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D445 Test Method for Kinematic Viscosity of Transparent and Opaque Liquids (and Calculation of Dynamic Viscosity)
D4175 Terminology Relating to Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants
D4485 Specification for Performance of Active API Service Category Engine Oils
D4684 Test Method for Determination of Yield Stress and Apparent Viscosity of Engine Oils at Low Temperature
D5293 Test Method for Apparent Viscosity of Engine Oils and Base Stocks Between –10 °C and –35 °C Using Cold-Cranking
Simulator
D7320 Test Method for Evaluation of Automotive Engine Oils in the Sequence IIIG, Spark-Ignition Engine
2.2 SAE Standard:
SAE J300 Engine Oil Viscosity Classification
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 candidate oil, n—an oil that is intended to have the performance characteristics necessary to satisfy a specification and is
to be tested against that specification. D4175
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Available from SAE International, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, http://www.sae.org.
D7528 − 22
3.1.2 non-reference oil, n—any oil other than a reference oil, such as a research formulation, commercial oil or candidate oil.
D4175
3.1.3 reference oil, n—an oil of known performance characteristics, used as a basis for comparison.
3.1.3.1 Discussion—
Reference oils are used to calibrate testing facilities, to compare the performance of other oils, or to evaluate other materials (such
as seals) that interact with oils. D4175
3.1.3 non-reference oil, n—any oil other than a reference oil, such as a research formulation, commercial oil or candidate oil.
D4175
3.1.4 test oil, n—any oil subjected to evaluation in an established procedure. D4175
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 aged oil, n—a test oil after it has been subjected to the 40 h aging process in a ROBO apparatus.
3.3 Acronyms:
3.3.1 ROBO, n—Romaszewski Oil Bench Oxidation
4. Summary of Test Method
4.1 The test oil is combined with a small amount of iron ferrocene catalyst and placed in a 1 L reaction vessel. That mixture is
stirred and heated for 40 h at 170 ºC with air flowing across the liquid surface under negative pressure. In addition, nitrogen dioxide
and air are introduced below the reaction surface. After cooling, the oxidized, concentrated test oil is subjected to pertinent
viscometric tests. Evaporated oil is condensed in order to weigh it and calculate evaporative loss.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 This bench test method is intended to produce comparable oil aging characteristics to those obtained with ASTM TMC
Sequence IIIGA matrix reference oils 434, 435, and 438 after aging in the Sequence IIIG engine test.
5.2 To the extent that the method generates aged oils comparable to those from the Sequence IIIG engine test, the measured
increases in kinematic and MRV viscosity indicate the tendency of an oil to thicken because of volatilization and oxidation, as in
the Sequence IIIG and IIIGA (see Appendix X1 in Test Method D7320) engine tests, respectively.
5.3 This bench test procedure has potential use in specifications and classifications of engine lubricating oils, such as Specification
D4485.
5.4 The results of this test method are valid when seeking qualification of oils against published specifications only when run on
a test stand that has successfully met the calibration requirements specified under the TMC’s ROBO test monitoring program.
6. Apparatus
6.1 Balances:
6.1.1 Analytical Balance—Capable of weighing 200 g with a minimum indication resolution of 0.1 g.
6.1.2 Analytical Balance—Capable of weighing 0.1 g with a minimum indication resolution of 0.001 g.
6.2 Fume Hood, that vents to the outside atmosphere (see Section 8).
Kinker, B. G., Romaszewski, R. A., and Palmer, P. A., “ROBO–A Bench Procedure to Replace Sequence IIIGA Engine Test,” Journal of ASTM International (JAI), Vol
4, No. 10, 2007, Paper ID JAI 100916. Available online from www.astm.org.
D7528 − 22
6,7
6.3 Reaction Vessel (ACE Glass, Inc. part number D120676), a 1 L, thick-walled glass vessel having a nominal 100 mm inner
8,7
diameter and with a bottom, sample/drain valve. The lower half has an Instatherm coating, rated at approximately 400 W, for
heating the test mixture. A diagram is shown in Fig. A5.1.
6.4 Vessel Head—The vessel head is a stainless steel plate of sufficient diameter to completely cover the lower glass vessel and
9,7
provide ample material for a sturdy mounting system. Reimel Machine, Inc. part number RMI-1002-DH has been shown to be
suitable for this application. The vessel head may also be constructed as described in Annex A6. Users may also source some parts
from Reimel Machine, Inc. and some in-house. Ensure the plate has a center hole for an agitator shaft and threaded ports to allow
filling and for the attachment of air/nitrogen dioxide lines, vacuum control and relief valves, and a temperature probe. Fig. A6.1
defines the locations of these ports. Mill the bottom surface of this stainless steel plate to accept a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)
9,7
ring seal for centered attachment of the glass vessel as described in Annex A7. Reimel Machine, Inc. part number RMI-1007-DH
has been found suitable for this purpose.
6.5 Stirrer Motor—An electric motor with drill chuck collet capable of sustained operation at 200 r/min 6 5 r/min.
6.6 Stirrer—An 8 mm diameter stainless steel rod, 300 mm long with a means of attaching a blade assembly at the bottom. The
turbine blade assembly diameter is 2.58 in. (65.5 mm) with 1.4 mm thick blades attached at a 45° pitch with an overall blade height
9,7
of 0.985 in. (25.0 mm). Construct the stirrer as described in Annex A8. Reimel Machine, Inc. part number RMI-1001-DH has
been found suitable for this purpose.
6.6.1 Attach the stirrer to the reactor head by means of a packing gland constructed as described in Annex A9. Reimel Machine,
9,7
Inc. part number RMI-1004-DH has been found suitable for this purpose. Attach the stirrer to the stirrer motor by inserting the
8 mm steel rod through the opening in the reactor head and the packing gland, and insert PTFE rope packing to create a seal.
6.6.2 Position the blade 6 mm from the bottom of the vessel.
6.7 Air Supply System—Capable A gas source capable of delivering an uninterrupted flow of dry air into the test oil via a
subsurface feed throughout the reaction time period. An in-line, desiccant-charged, drying system has been found suitable.
6.7.1 Ensure the subsurface feed tube opening remains below the surface of the test fluid for the duration of the test. Do not place
the tube in the drain area of the reaction flask.
6.7.2 A second gas source consisting of a gas cylinder containing dilute nitrogen dioxide in air may be added along with a valve
to switch between the two gas sources. The volume fraction of nitrogen dioxide in air needed is 1.13 %. See Appendix X6 for how
this is derived. The volume fraction as certified by the supplier must fall in the range of 1.07 % to 1.19 %.
NOTE 1—As the amount of test oil remaining at the end of the test is not always known at the beginning of the test, it is advisable to configure the dry-air
tube location such that the opening of the tube is as close to the agitator and as close to the bottom of the reactor as practical (without contacting the
agitator or blocking the tube opening).
,
6.8 Graduated Tube Nitrogen Dioxide Delivery System— (Ace Glass, Inc., part number D120677),There are two options 12 mL
capacity, with 0.1 mL graduations and having appropriate provisions for connection to the reaction vessel’s subsurface gas delivery
system—see for adding nitrogen dioxide. One uses Annex A10 for more details. By receiving liquid phase nitrogen dioxide from
a gas bottle, this tube allows measurement of nitrogen dioxide depletion from the tube over the course of the reaction. liquid
nitrogen dioxide and the other uses dilute nitrogen dioxide in air.
6,7
6.8.1 Graduated Tube for Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide (Ace Glass, Inc., part number D120677), 12 mL capacity, with 0.1 mL
graduations and having appropriate provisions for connection to the reaction vessel’s subsurface gas delivery system—see Annex
A10 for more details. By receiving liquid phase nitrogen dioxide from a gas bottle, this tube allows measurement of nitrogen
dioxide depletion from the tube over the course of the reaction. This graduated tube is only used for the liquid nitrogen dioxide
option.
The sole source of supply of the apparatus known to the committee at this time is Ace Glass, Inc., P.O. Box 688, 1430 NW Blvd., Vineland, NJ 08362-0688.
If you are aware of alternative suppliers, please provide this information to ASTM. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible
technical committee which you may attend.
Instatherm is a registered trademark of Ace Glass, Inc., P.O. Box 688, 1430 NW Blvd., Vineland, NJ 08362-0688.
The sole source of supply of the apparatus known to the committee at this time is Reimel Machine, Inc., 2575 Wyandotte Rd., Willow Grove, PA 19090.
D7528 − 22
6.8.2 Gas Cylinder Containing Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide in Air—Second gas source using dilute nitrogen dioxide in dry air as
defined in 6.7.2. This is only used for the dilute nitrogen dioxide option.
6.9 Temperature Control System—A controller and probe capable of being programmed to control reaction temperature via low
output wattage at or below 40 V ac and with an operational hysteresis of 0.1 °C using an on/off algorithm. Alternatively, a
proportional-integral-derivative (PID) algorithm may also be used. Position the temperature probe tip so that it is level with the
bottom of the turbine blade with a distance of 8 mm between the probe center and the blade edge.
6.9.1 As the temperature may not be uniform throughout the reactor, it is important from the point of view of precision that the
temperature is always monitored and controlled at the specified position inside the reactor. When reassembling the reactor for a
new run, reposition the probe, if necessary, as it is easily bent.
6.10 Flow Meters:
10,7
6.10.1 Acrylic Block Airflow Meter (King Instrument Co., 7520 Series, Order number 2C-17), having a scale of 0.4 to 4
Standard Cubic Feet per Minute (SCFM), with ⁄4 in. NPT threaded female pipe end. It is used for measuring air flow in 10.3.2.
The machined fitting for the top of the flow meter shall accommodate the vacuum line from the condenser to the reactor with a
3 1
⁄8 in. inside diameter or larger. The machined fitting for the bottom of the flow meter shall accommodate the ⁄4 in. vacuum control
valve.
NOTE 2—SCFM is the volumetric flow rate of a gas corrected to standardized conditions of temperature, pressure, and relative humidity, thus representing
a precise mass flow rate. However, the definitions of standard conditions vary. In this method, the flow meter is calibrated with air at standard conditions
defined as a temperature of 70 °F, a pressure of 14.6 psia and 0 % relative humidity.
6.10.2 Airflow Meter, with a scale calibrated in mL/min for measuring subsurface airflow of 185 mL/min in 10.3.1 and 10.3.2. Two
air flow meters may be used in the dilute nitrogen dioxide configuration depending on the location of the switching valve.
6.10.2.1 A digital mass flow controller may also be used to measure and control the flow rate. This type of flow controller is
recommended, but not required, for the dilute nitrogen dioxide in air option.
6.11 Vacuum System—A pump with a free air capability of at least 160 L/min is required to ensure a constant air flow across the
reaction surface in the vessel of 2.0 SCFM 6 0.1 SCFM with 61 kPa vacuum for 40 h. Instructions for constructing the vacuum
plumbing for the vessel are given in Annex A11. As explained in Annex A11, it is critical to follow these instructions precisely.
6.12 Vacuum Control Valve—A stainless steel needle valve with ⁄4 in. outside diameter tube connections and a flow coefficient
(Cv) of 0.37 has been found suitable for this application.
6.13 Vacuum Trap System—Supplies coolant at an inlet temperature <20 °C to the vacuum trap condensers in order to remove
vapors from the effluent prior to entering (and possibly damaging) the vacuum system and has a means of recovering the distillate
for weighing. Redundant (serial) condensers are beneficial as long as the required airflow across the reaction surface is maintained.
Annex A12 provides information on two systems that have been found to be satisfactory.
6.14 Time Controller—A timing device accurate to 1 min is used to deactivate the heat source.
6.15 Precision Needle Valve, having a low Cv for precise control of the flow of nitrogen dioxide. Examples of valves that have
been found satisfactory are given in Appendix X3. This valve is used with the liquid nitrogen dioxide option in 6.8.1. It is not
required for the dilute nitrogen dioxide option described in 6.8.2.
6.16 Beaker—300 mL capacity.
6.17 Glass Jar—250 mL capacity which can be sealed.
The sole source of supply of the apparatus known to the committee at this time is King Instrument Co., 12700 Pala Drive Garden Grove, CA 92841.
D7528 − 22
6.18 Shaker—Use either a reciprocal or an elliptical shaker.
6.19 Assembled ROBO Apparatus—Fig. X4.1 shows an example of an assembled ROBO apparatus. However, because it is
assembled from different components, some of which are site specific (for example, geometry of fume hood, local safety
considerations, use of different parts such as temperature controllers, and so forth), there is no standard ROBO apparatus assembly.
As an aid to building and setting up a new ROBO apparatus, a package of information is available on the TMC website. This
(non-mandatory) information supplements that given in Section 6. An index to the contents of this information package is given
in Appendix X5.
7. Reagents and Materials
7.1 Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide—Dioxide: Produces a reddish-brown gas with a pungent odor. (Warning—VERY TOXIC if inhaled
or ingested. Explosive if mixed with combustible material. Irritating to eyes and respiratory system. Danger of very serious
irreversible health effects.)
7.1.1 Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide (Used with the Option in 6.8.1)—Produces a reddish-brown gas with a pungent odor.
(Warning—VERY TOXIC if inhaled or ingested. Explosive if mixed with combustible material. Irritating to eyes and respiratory
system. Danger of very serious irreversible health effects.).
7.1.2 Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide in Air (Used with the Option in 6.8.2)—(Warning—Compared to liquid nitrogen dioxide, the
exposure risk is greatly reduced, but not negligible.)
7.2 Iron Ferrocene—98 % or higher purity. (Warning—Do not breathe dust. Harmful if swallowed.)
7.3 Oil—100 Neutral, API Group II, for mixing with iron ferrocene catalyst.
7.4 Cleaning Solvent—Commercial heptanes, or similar solvents that evaporate without leaving a residue, are suitable.
(Warning—flammable.)
7.5 Acetone—A technical grade of acetone is suitable provided it does not leave a residue upon evaporation. This is used for a final
cleaning rinse. Acetone will degrade fluoroelastomer seals and can dissolve or deteriorate acrylics. (Warning—flammable.)
7.6 Dry Air—Desiccated air is suitable.
7.7 Reference Oils—The current TMC reference oils are required for setting up the ROBO apparatus test stand (see Section 9).
The TMC maintains and distributes these oils. These oils are formulated or selected to represent specific chemical types or
performance levels, or both. See A2.4 for additional information regarding reference oils.
7.7.1 The TMC is responsible for managing a system that ensures the performance and formulation consistency of the reference
oils. Store the reference oils in locations where the ambient temperature does not exceed 32 °C. Under these conditions, the
expected shelf life of a reference oil is five years. In some circumstances, however, the TMC may specify a shelf life longer than
five years. In such cases, the TMC uses documented analysis procedures to justify the longer shelf life.
7.7.2 Unless specifically authorized by the TMC, do not analyze TMC reference oils, either physically or chemically. The testing
laboratory tacitly agrees to use the TMC reference oils exclusively in accordance with the TMC’s published Policies for Use and
Analysis of ASTM Reference Oils, and to run and report the reference oil test according to TMC guidelines.
NOTE 3—Policies for the Use and Analysis of ASTM Reference Oils are available from the TMC.
8. Hazards
8.1 Specific Hazards—Due to nitrogen dioxide toxicity, with the exception of weighing, perform steps 10.3 – 10.8 of the procedure
in the fume hood. See also 7.1.
D7528 − 22
9. New and Existing Test Stand Calibration
9.1 New Test Stand at New Test Laboratory Calibration—For new ROBO apparatus at existing laboratory, proceed to 9.2. For
existing ROBO apparatus test stands, proceed to 9.3.
9.1.1 Obtain the required, current reference oils from the TMC for the purpose of setting up a new ROBO apparatus stand. (See
7.7.2 and Annex A2 for conditions of use for the TMC reference oils.)
9.1.2 Test the assigned reference oils according to the procedure described in Section 10.
9.1.2.1 It is imperative that the vacuum control valve (VCV) set position be set on the first set-up test and not changed again for
subsequent set-up qualifying runs.
9.1.2.2 If the VCV set position is changed by more than 60.125 revolutions after the start of the first qualifying set-up test run,
all previous tests in the set-up test sequence are void; repeat the test stand setup runs from 9.1.1 – 9.1.4.
9.1.3 Determine the viscometric properties of the aged reference oils as described in Section 12 and report according to Section
13.
9.1.4 Report test results to the TMC using the standardized reporting protocols (see 9.3.3 and Section 13). Be sure to include all
required operational parameters as defined in the reporting protocol data dictionary.
9.1.5 Review all initial set-up results on new instruments and receive approval from the TMC.
9.1.5.1 Test results will be posted to the TMC website. Lab identification will be coded by the TMC for confidentiality of the
testing laboratory.
9.1.6 If all the required test stand set-up runs meet the current, approved ROBO TMC calibration requirements (both
operationally and statistically), the TMC will notify the laboratory that it can proceed with calibrating the test stand per 9.3.
9.1.7 If the TMC’s review determines that the required test stand set-up runs do not collectively meet the approved requirements
(both operationally and statistically), the TMC will notify the laboratory that additional adjustments need to be made to the test
stand and one or more of the set-up runs will have to be repeated.
9.2 New Test Stand at Existing Laboratory Calibration:
9.2.1 Laboratory can proceed with calibrating the test stand per 9.3.
9.3 Existing Test Stand Calibration:
9.3.1 Reference Oil Test Frequency—The TMC requires test stands to pass periodic calibration verification with reference oils
supplied by the TMC. These calibration verification runs are typically run on blind-coded reference oil samples.
9.3.1.1 Prior to conducting a TMC reference oil test for the purpose of stand calibration, procure a supply of reference oil directly
from the TMC. (See 7.7.2 and Annex A2 for conditions of use for the TMC reference oils.) The reference oils are usually supplied
directly to a testing laboratory with blind-coded identification numbers to ensure that the laboratory is not influenced by prior
knowledge of a reference oil’s acceptable performance results in assessing the test results. The TMC will determine which specific
reference oil or oils the laboratory shall test in accordance with the calibration requirements.
9.3.1.2 Initial calibration verification of a new test stand or repeated consecutive unacceptable calibration verifications on a test
stand requires passing two consecutive TMC reference oil tests.
9.3.1.3 The same nitrogen dioxide delivery configuration must be used to re-verify the calibration status and then continued to be
used for subsequent certified runs.
The ROBO LTMS Calibration Requirements document is available at: http://www.astmtmc.org/ftp/docs/ltms/ltms.pdf.
D7528 − 22
9.3.1.4 Certain operational changes to the test stand, as specified in the TMC calibration requirements, voids the TMC test stand
calibration status and requires passing two consecutive TMC reference oil tests to re-verify the calibration status of the modified
test stand.
9.3.1.5 During the time of conducting a reference oil test on one test stand, non-reference oil tests may be conducted on other
previously calibrated stands.
9.3.2 Test Numbering:
9.3.2.1 The test number shall follow the format AAA-BB-CCCC.AAA represents the test stand identification. BB represents the
number of tests since last reference. CCCC represents the total number of tests on the stand. As an example, 6-10-175 represents
the 175 test on Stand 6 and the tenth test since the last reference. Consecutively number all tests on a given stand.
9.3.3 Reporting of Reference Oil Test Results—Report the results of all reference oil tests to the TMC according to the following
instructions:
9.3.3.1 Transmit results according to the ROBO Standardized Report Forms and Data Dictionary to the TMC within five days
of test completion via electronic data transfer protocol as outlined in the Data Communication Committee, Electronic Test Report
Transmission Model (ETRTM).
NOTE 4—Be sure to collect data on all the required parameters defined in the ROBO Standardized Data Dictionary (see Section 13). Validity evaluation
of test results cannot be made if critical evaluation parameters are missing.
9.3.4 Evaluation of Reference Oil Test Results—The TMC evaluates the reference oil test results for both operational validity and
statistical acceptability. The TMC may consult with the test laboratory in case of difficulty, as follows:
9.3.4.1 Upon receipt of the reference oil test results from the test laboratory, the TMC evaluates the laboratory’s reported
operational parameters for compliance with the current test method. For operationally valid tests, the TMC then evaluates the
pass/fail parameters for statistical validity. The TMC sends a test confirmation report to the test laboratory indicating the overall
validity of the calibration test results, and disclosing the non-blind industry reference oil code.
9.3.4.2 In the event the reference oil test is unacceptable, the test laboratory shall provide an explanation of the problem relating
to the failure. If the problem is not obvious, carry out operational re-checks (instrumentations, settings, and procedures). Following
the re-checks, the TMC assigns another reference oil for testing by the laboratory. If this reference oil test is unacceptable, a
reassessment of the stand setup as described in 9.1 or 9.2 may be necessary.
9.3.4.3 It is recognized that a certain percentage of calibration tests will fall outside the acceptance limits because of the
application of statistics in the development of the acceptance limits. The TMC decides, with consultation as needed with industry
experts (testing laboratories, members of the ASTM Technical Guidance Committee, the surveillance panel, and so forth), whether
the reason for any failure of a reference oil test is a false alarm, testing apparatus, testing laboratory, or industry-related problem.
The ROBO surveillance panel adjudicates all industry problems.
9.3.5 Reference Oil Accountability:
9.3.5.1 Laboratories conducting calibration tests are required to provide a full accounting of the identification and quantities of
all reference oils used.
9.3.5.2 With the exception of analysis required in this test method, no additional physical or chemical analysis of new or used
reference oils is permitted without the express permission of the TMC. (See 7.7.2 and Annex A2 for conditions of use for the TMC
reference oils.)
10. Procedure
10.1 Vacuum Control Valve Setting—For a new ROBO apparatus test stand, set the vacuum control valve as described in Annex
The ROBO Standardized Report Forms and Data Dictionary specification is available at: ftp://ftp.astmtmc.org/datadict/robo/current/.
The Data Communication Committee, Electronic Test Report Transmission Model (ETRTM) document is available at: ftp://ftp.astmtmc.org/docs/
datacommunicationscommittee/electronic_test_report_transmission_specification/.
D7528 − 22
A13. The control valve setting is critical as it affects the severity of the test. For all subsequent runs involving test oils, use exactly
the same control valve setting to that used during the last successful TMC calibration verification run.
10.2 Catalyst Preparation:
10.2.1 Weigh 0.1 g 6 0.001 g of iron ferrocene (see warning in 7.2) into an appropriate container such as a 250 mL glass jar.
10.2.2 Add 99.9 g 6 0.1 g of API Group II 100 Neutral oil to obtain 0.100 % 6 0.001 % (mass) iron ferrocene.
10.2.3 Mix thoroughly, until the catalyst is completely in solution as determined by a lack of visible particles.
NOTE 5—This may take 1 h or more.
10.3 Vessel Seal Check:
10.3.1 Start subsurface dry-air flow at a rate of 185 mL/min.
10.3.2 On an assembled vessel, install the acrylic block flow meter between the top connection of the vacuum control valve and
the vacuum source. Apply vacuum to the vessel and block the vacuum relief orifice long enough to assure the system will attain
85 kPa with a subsurface airflow of 185 mL/min.
10.3.2.1 The acrylic block air flow meter shall read less than 0.6 SCFM.
10.4 Preset Vacuum Flow—With the vacuum still applied to the vessel, set the air flow through the reactor to 2.0 SCFM 6
0.1 SCFM by bleeding air, if needed, into the vacuum line between the vacuum source and the condenser. Maintain the vacuum
pressure at 61 kPa 6 1.7 kPa by adjusting the vacuum relief valve. Once these parameters are set, shut off the vacuum and remove
the acrylic block flow meter from the system.
10.5 Sample Preparation and Charging Nitrogen Dioxide:
NOTE 6—Steps 10.5.1 – 10.5.3 may be carried out in any order or simultaneously.
10.5.1 Sample Preparation—Introduce 3.0 g 6 0.1 g of prepared iron ferrocene catalyst solution and 197.0 g 6 1.0 g test oil to
the reaction vessel. See Appendix X1 for suggested mixing procedures. If the direct weighing procedure (X1.1.2) is used, do the
vessel seal check (10.3) and the preset vacuum flow (10.4) procedure after the apparatus is reassembled.
NOTE 7—The total mass of oil in the reactor is 200 g 6 1.0 g (197.0 g 6 1.0 g from the test oil and 3.0 g from the catalyst solution).
10.5.1.1 Start the stirrer motor and agitate at 200 r ⁄min 6 5 r ⁄min.
10.5.2 Make the electrical connections to the heater. (Warning—To avoid electric shock and possible ignition spark, check that
the power is de-energized before making electrical connections.)
10.5.3 Charging Nitrogen Dioxide—Dioxide: Transfer 2.0 mL 6 0.1 mL of liquid nitrogen dioxide (see Section 8 and warning in
7.1) into the graduated tube. See Appendix X2 for examples of how the transfer may be made.
10.5.3.1 Liquid Nitrogen Dioxide Option Only—Transfer 2.0 mL 6 0.1 mL of liquid nitrogen dioxide (see Section 8 and warning
in 7.1) into the graduated tube. See Appendix X2 for examples of how the transfer may be made.
10.5.3.2 Dilute Nitrogen Dioxide Option Only—The amount of nitrogen dioxide introduced can be calculated. An amount
equivalent to 2.0 mL 6 0.1 mL of liquid nitrogen dioxide is required. See Appendix X6 for example calculation.
10.6 Oil Aging:
10.6.1 General—Begin the oil aging by setting the time and temperature and turning on the vacuum.
D7528 − 22
10.6.1.1 Complete steps 10.6.2 – 10.6.5 within 1 min; the order in which they are carried out is not important.
10.6.2 Set the time controller to 40 h to initiate the oil aging.
10.6.3 Set the temperature controller to 170 °C and commence heating.
10.6.4 Adjust the temperature controller voltage output to 25 V to 40 V.
10.6.5 Turn the vacuum system on.
10.6.6 Immediately after the previous steps, adjust the nitrogen dioxide precision needle valve to allow introduction of nitrogen
dioxide in a controlled and gradual manner into the inlet flow stream. Ensure that the nitrogen dioxide is completely depleted from
the tube and introduced into the reactor within 12 h 6 1 h.Start the nitrogen dioxide flow.
10.6.6.1 For the liquid nitrogen dioxide option, immediately after the previous steps, adjust the nitrogen dioxide precision needle
valve to allow introduction of nitrogen dioxide in a controlled and gradual manner into the inlet flow stream. Ensure that the
nitrogen dioxide is completely depleted from the tube and introduced into the reactor within 12 h 6 1 h.
10.6.6.2 Because changes to the nitrogen dioxide flow rate can affect precision, it is imperative that nitrogen dioxide be introduced
to the reactor in a controlled and gradual manner. Using a flow rate target of 0.167 mL/h, monitor nitrogen dioxide depletion
closely in the first 2 h to 4 h, the aim being to introduce 0.5 mL during that time period. Introduce the remaining 1.5 mL at a similar
flow rate, ensuring that the total of 2.0 mL is delivered between 11 h and 13 h. A run is invalid if the flow of nitrogen dioxide
exceeds 0.5 mL during any 1 h period.
10.6.6.3 For the dilute nitrogen dioxide option, switch to dilute nitrogen dioxide for 12.0 h. A run is invalid if the flow of dilute
nitrogen dioxide in air deviates from the required 185 mL ⁄min by more than 6 % during at any of the observations. At least 6
observations during the first 6 h of the air flow must be made and recorded with the last observation being made at about 6 h. The
air flow may be adjusted at these times. If all of the readings before adjustments are within 5 % of 185 mL ⁄min, then no more
observations are required. If the air flow deviates by more than 4 % during the first 6 h, then six more observations are required
from hours 6 to 12. After 12.0 h, switch back to the dry-air supply for the remainder of the test.
10.6.6.4 If any deviations from 185 mL ⁄min of more than 2 mL ⁄min were observed (or calculated at the 12 h switching time), then
calculate and report the time-averaged flow rate. See Appendix X7 for examples.
10.7 Shutdown:
10.7.1 At the end of the 40 h cycle, allow the system to cool to room temperature while maintaining the airflow and agitation.
10.7.2 Turn off the vacuum. (The vacuum flow can be turned off at any time after completion of the 40 h cycle.) Bleed the pressure
by opening a port, for example, the sample addition port. Drain the aged oil into a suitable container.
10.8 Mass Percent Volatiles Collected:
10.8.1 Drain the condensed liquid from the vacuum trap system into a tared vessel. Determine and record the mass of the
condensed liquid to the nearest 0.1 g.
10.8.2 Calculate as follows:
M volatiles
~ !
Mass % volatiles, %m/m5 100 (1)
M~fresh!
where:
M(fresh) = 200 g = the mass of fresh oil added to the reactor in 10.5.1, and
M(volatiles) = mass, g, of condensate collected in 10.8.1.
NOTE 8—The significance of the % volatiles parameter is under investigation.
D7528 − 22
11. Cleaning
11.1 Clean the reaction vessel with cleaning solvent (see warning in 7.4).
11.1.1 Scrub any residual material off the glass surface while taking care not to scratch the inside of the vessel. Perform a final
rinse with acetone (see warning in 7.5).
11.2 Clean the vacuum control valve.
11.2.1 Flush the valve with cleaning solvent or carburetor cleaner, followed with an acetone rinse to remove and avoid any carbon
deposits that could reduce or plug the valve orifice.
11.2.2 Additional optional cleaning may be needed in cases where there is insufficient vacuum flow (see 10.4). If vacuum flow
is sufficient, skip to step 11.3.
11.2.2.1 Disassemble the valve and remove any carbon deposits from the plug and inside seat of the valve body.
11.2.2.2 Flush as in 11.2.1.
11.2.2.3 Reassemble the vacuum control valve, ensuring that the valve setting is at exactly the same position to that used during
the last successful TMC calibration verification run.
11.3 Clean the underside of the reactor cap and all shafts or probes protruding downward into the vessel with cleaning solvent and
a lightweight, lint-free towel. Rinse with acetone.
11.4 Ensure that subsurface air supply lines are clear, then clean them with cleaning solvent and reassemble when dry.
11.5 Clean the acrylic block flow meter with cleaning solvent. Do not use acetone which can dissolve or deteriorate acrylics.
12. Calculations and Determination of Test Results
12.1 Increase in Kinematic Viscosity at 40 °C:
12.1.1 Calculate as follows:
KV aged 2 KV fresh
@ ~ ! ~ !#
Percent viscosity increase PVIS 5 100 (2)
~ !
KV~fresh!
where:
KV(aged) = kinematic viscosity, mm /s, at 40 °C of the aged oil as determined by Test Method D445, and
KV(fresh) = kinematic viscosity, mm /s, at 40 °C of the fresh oil as determined by Test Method D445.
12.2 Low-Temperature Viscometric Properties:
12.2.1 Using Test Method D5293, measure the Cold Cranking Simulator (CCS) viscosity of the ROBO-aged oil at the temperature
specified for the SAE W grade of the fresh oil. This temperature can be found in the SAE J300 Viscosity Classification System
(hereafter referred to as SAE J300).
12.2.1.1 If the measured CCS viscosity is less than or equal to the maximum CCS viscosity specified in SAE J300 for the SAE
W grade of the fresh oil, measure the MRV viscosity by Test Method D4684 at the MRV temperature specified in SAE J300 for
the SAE W grade of the fresh oil.
12.2.1.2 If the measured CCS viscosity is higher than the maximum CCS viscosity specified in SAE J300 for the SAE W viscosity
grade of the fresh oil, measure the MRV viscosity by Test Method D4684 at 5 °C higher than the MRV temperature specified in
SAE J300 for the original SAE W viscosity grade of the fresh oil (that is, at the MRV temperature specified in SAE J300 for the
next higher SAE W viscosity grade).
D7528 − 22
A
TABLE 1 Test Precision
Intermediate Precision Reproducibility
Variable
B C B C
S i.p. S R
i.p. R
D
PVIS 0.191 0.535 0.267 0.748
D
MRV viscosity 0.25 0.70 0.40 1.12
A
These statistics are based on results obtained from an interlaboratory program
in which seven samples were tested in seven laboratories on ten test rigs (see 14).
The samples consisted of SAE 5W-XX and 10W-30 multigrade engine oils
including ASTM Test Monitoring Center Reference Oils 434, 435, and 438.
B
S = Standard deviation.
C
This value is obtained by multiplying the standard deviation by 2.8.
D
The original units for PVIS are percent viscosity increase. The original units for
MRV viscosity are mPa·s. These parameters are transformed using ln(result).
When comparing two test results on these parameters, first apply this transforma-
tion to each test result. Compare the absolute difference between the transformed
results with the appropriate (intermediate precision or reproducibility) precision
limit.
13. Report
13.1 Report Forms—For TMC reference oil tests, use the standardized report form set and data dictionary.
NOTE 9—Report the non-reference oil test results on these same forms if the results are intended to be submitted as candidate oil results against a
specification.
13.1.1 Report reference oil test results to the TMC according to the ETRTM protocols described in 9.3.3.1.
13.2 Reporting Units—Report results in SI units.
13.3 Report the following:
13.3.1 Kinematic viscosity at 40 °C, by Test Method D445, of the test oil before and after aging.
2 2
13.3.1.1 Report to two decimal places for viscosities between 10 mm /s and 100 mm /s and to one decimal place for viscosities
>100 mm /s.
13.3.2 Percent increase in kinematic viscosity at 40 °C after aging (PVIS)—see 12.1.
13.3.2.1 Report to nearest 0.1 %.
13.3.3 SAE W grade of the fresh oil.
13.3.4 The CCS viscosity and temperature of measurement of the ROBO-aged oil by Test Method D5293.
13.3.5 The MRV viscosity, yield stress and temperature of measurement of the aged oil by Test Method D4684—see 12.2.1.1 and
12.2.1.2.
13.3.6 The option used to add nitrogen dioxide. Liquid nitrogen dioxide or dilute nitrogen dioxide.
13.3.6.1 If the dilute nitrogen dioxide option was used, calculate and report the total amount of nitrogen dioxide delivered to the
reactor to the nearest one-tenth of a milliliter.
14. Precision and Bias
14.1 Precision—The precision of this test method as determined by the statistical examination of the interlaboratory tests results
is given in Table 1.
Supporting data have been filed at ASTM International Headquarters and may be obtained by requesting Research Report RR:D02-1660. Contact ASTM Customer
Service at service@astm.org.
D7528 − 22
14.1.1 Intermediate Precision Conditions—Conditions where test results are obtained with the same test method using the same
oil, with changing conditions such as operators, measuring equipment, test apparatus, and time.
NOTE 10—Intermediate precision is the appropriate term for this test method, rather than repeatability, which defines more rigorous within-laboratory
conditions.
14.1.1.1 Intermediate Precision Limit (i.p.)—The difference between two results obtained under intermediate precision conditions
that would in the long run, in the normal and correct conduct of the test method, exceed the values shown in Table 1 in only one
case in twenty. When only a single test result is available, the Intermediate Precision Limit can be used to calculate a range (test
result 6 Intermediate Precision Limit) outside of which a second test result would be expected to fall about one time in twenty.
14.1.2 Reproducibility Conditions—Conditions where test results are obtained with the same test method using the same test oil
in different laboratories with different operators using different equipment.
14.1.2.1 Reproducibility Limit (R)—The difference between two results obtained under reproducibility conditions that would, in
the long run, in the normal and correct conduct of the test method, exceed the values in Table 1 in only one case in twenty.
14.2 Bias—No estimate of the bias for this procedure is possible because the p
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...