Standard Test Method for Monitoring Atmospheric Corrosion Tests by Electrical Resistance Probes

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Corrosivity monitoring of test environments provides a means to monitor an integrated value of test corrosivity which cannot be evaluated from test parameters themselves, such as temperature, humidity, and gas concentration. As such the monitor value can be used for specification purposes such as test validation. Electrical resistance monitoring of conductors exposed to corrosive media is a well-established practice.3,4,5,6  
4.2 The resistance method assumes uniform corrosion over the entire surface of the exposed metal conductor segment. Local corrosion such as pitting, crevice, or grain boundary corrosion may provide invalid estimates of test corrosivity. Marked changes in slope of the curve of electrical resistance ratio versus time may indicate undesired processes which can be due to deficiencies in the test atmosphere or in the monitor itself.  
4.3 Because of limitations of the diffusion process within the corrosion product formed on the metal conductor segment of the RM probe when passivating corrosion films are formed, resistance monitoring may not be useful for test chamber monitoring purposes for very long test exposures. Chamber monitoring is dependent on detecting changes in the rate of corrosion of the RM as an indicator signal that specified gas concentrations must be reverified. However, low corrosion rates limit the absolute value of the rate of change of corrosion rate with change of test conditions; for parabolic film growth processes, the growth rate decreases with time limiting the sensitivity of the RM at extended test times.  
4.4 Since corrosion rate can be a complex function of test parameters in MFG tests with any given metal primarily responsive to a subset of the gases in the MFG environment, more than one type metal resistance probe is required in order to assist in maintenance of relative gas concentrations. For such test specifications, values of resistance ratios must be referred to ratios obtained under known test conditions a...
SCOPE
1.1 This test method provides a means for monitoring corrosivity of environmental tests that involve exposure to corrosive gases.  
1.2 This test method uses a resistance monitor (RM) probe fabricated from a chosen metal conductor, with one conductor segment uncovered to permit exposure of the chosen metal conductor to the corrosive gas mixture and the second conductor segment covered to protect the metal conductor of this segment from direct attack by the corrosive gas mixture. The covered conductor segment provides a reference for evaluating changes in the uncovered segment. The ratio of the resistance of the exposed segment to that of the covered segment provides a measure of the amount of metal conductor that has reacted with the corrosive gas test environment to form poorly conducting corrosion product, thus providing a measure of test corrosivity.  
1.3 Resistance monitoring is applicable to a broad range of test conditions by selection of the appropriate metal conductor and initial metal thickness.  
1.4 This method is similar in intent to Test Methods B808.  
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to become familiar with all hazards including those identified in the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for this product/material as provided by the manufacturer, to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices, and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the Wo...

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
30-Sep-2020

Relations

Effective Date
01-May-2018
Effective Date
01-Oct-2014
Effective Date
01-Aug-2013
Effective Date
01-Oct-2011
Effective Date
01-Oct-2010
Effective Date
01-Oct-2009
Effective Date
01-Oct-2009
Effective Date
15-Aug-2008
Effective Date
01-Dec-2006
Effective Date
01-May-2005
Effective Date
01-May-2005
Effective Date
01-Nov-2003
Effective Date
10-Jun-2003
Effective Date
10-Nov-2001
Effective Date
10-Nov-2001

Overview

ASTM B826-09(2020): Standard Test Method for Monitoring Atmospheric Corrosion Tests by Electrical Resistance Probes provides a systematic approach to assess the corrosivity of environments in which metals are exposed to corrosive gases. This method supports the monitoring and validation of corrosive test chambers by using electrical resistance (ER) probes made from specific metal conductors. These probes help evaluate the net corrosion effects in real-time, enabling accurate test validation and effective environmental chamber management.

By applying this standard, laboratories and industries can ensure the consistency and reliability of their corrosion testing procedures, particularly when dealing with complex environmental factors like temperature, humidity, and reactive gases.

Key Topics

  • Electrical Resistance Probing: The core method involves using an ER probe comprising two metal segments: one exposed to the corrosive environment and one protected. By comparing electrical resistance changes between these segments, users gain a quantitative measure of corrosion over time.
  • Applicability: The test method is versatile and can be tailored by selecting suitable metals and thicknesses for the probe, making it ideal for a wide range of atmospheric conditions and corrosive gases.
  • Monitoring and Validation: Continuous or periodic measurements track environmental corrosivity, providing integrated values not directly obtainable from test chamber parameters alone.
  • Limitations:
    • The method assumes uniform corrosion; localized forms like pitting may not be accurately represented.
    • Long-term use may be affected by the formation of passivating films or very low corrosion rates, reducing sensitivity.
    • Interferences such as probe contamination, reference segment corrosion, or temperature gradients can impact results and must be controlled.
  • Calibration and Reporting: Regular calibration of instrumentation and comprehensive reporting-including environmental conditions, probe location, and resistance ratio over time-are essential for valid results.

Applications

ASTM B826-09(2020) is widely applied in:

  • Environmental Test Chambers: Validating and monitoring the corrosivity levels in chambers used for mixed flowing gas (MFG) tests or similar atmospheric corrosion tests.
  • Materials Qualification: Assessing the resistance and durability of alloy samples, electronic components, and coatings under controlled corrosive conditions.
  • Process Control: Ensuring process stability and compliance in manufacturing or R&D settings where metal parts or assemblies are exposed to aggressive environmental agents.
  • Research and Development: Offering a standardized approach for scientists and engineers investigating the degradation behavior of metals in specific atmospheric conditions.

The standard ensures reliable monitoring in laboratories, quality control facilities, and industrial environments-supporting the detection of changes and the need for re-verification of gas concentrations.

Related Standards

To broaden the context and complement corrosion monitoring practices, the following ASTM standards are commonly referenced alongside ASTM B826-09(2020):

  • ASTM B808: Test Method for Monitoring of Atmospheric Corrosion Chambers by Quartz Crystal Microbalances
  • ASTM B810: Test Method for Calibration of Atmospheric Corrosion Test Chambers by Change in Mass of Copper Coupons
  • ASTM B827: Practice for Conducting Mixed Flowing Gas (MFG) Environmental Tests
  • ASTM G96: Guide for Online Monitoring of Corrosion in Plant Equipment (Electrical and Electrochemical Methods)

Practical Value

Implementing ASTM B826-09(2020) ensures precise, real-time monitoring of corrosion processes, supporting quality assurance and product lifetime assessment. The electrical resistance probe method enables data-driven control of environmental test conditions and compliance with international standards, making it crucial for sectors such as electronics, automotive, aerospace, and materials manufacturing.

Keywords: atmospheric corrosion, electrical resistance probe, corrosivity monitor, environmental test chamber, ASTM B826-09, mixed flowing gas test, corrosion monitoring, materials testing.

Buy Documents

Standard

ASTM B826-09(2020) - Standard Test Method for Monitoring Atmospheric Corrosion Tests by Electrical Resistance Probes

English language (4 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

Element Materials Technology

Materials testing and product certification.

UKAS United Kingdom Verified

Inštitut za kovinske materiale in tehnologije

Institute of Metals and Technology. Materials testing, metallurgical analysis, NDT.

SA Slovenia Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

ASTM B826-09(2020) is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Test Method for Monitoring Atmospheric Corrosion Tests by Electrical Resistance Probes". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 Corrosivity monitoring of test environments provides a means to monitor an integrated value of test corrosivity which cannot be evaluated from test parameters themselves, such as temperature, humidity, and gas concentration. As such the monitor value can be used for specification purposes such as test validation. Electrical resistance monitoring of conductors exposed to corrosive media is a well-established practice.3,4,5,6 4.2 The resistance method assumes uniform corrosion over the entire surface of the exposed metal conductor segment. Local corrosion such as pitting, crevice, or grain boundary corrosion may provide invalid estimates of test corrosivity. Marked changes in slope of the curve of electrical resistance ratio versus time may indicate undesired processes which can be due to deficiencies in the test atmosphere or in the monitor itself. 4.3 Because of limitations of the diffusion process within the corrosion product formed on the metal conductor segment of the RM probe when passivating corrosion films are formed, resistance monitoring may not be useful for test chamber monitoring purposes for very long test exposures. Chamber monitoring is dependent on detecting changes in the rate of corrosion of the RM as an indicator signal that specified gas concentrations must be reverified. However, low corrosion rates limit the absolute value of the rate of change of corrosion rate with change of test conditions; for parabolic film growth processes, the growth rate decreases with time limiting the sensitivity of the RM at extended test times. 4.4 Since corrosion rate can be a complex function of test parameters in MFG tests with any given metal primarily responsive to a subset of the gases in the MFG environment, more than one type metal resistance probe is required in order to assist in maintenance of relative gas concentrations. For such test specifications, values of resistance ratios must be referred to ratios obtained under known test conditions a... SCOPE 1.1 This test method provides a means for monitoring corrosivity of environmental tests that involve exposure to corrosive gases. 1.2 This test method uses a resistance monitor (RM) probe fabricated from a chosen metal conductor, with one conductor segment uncovered to permit exposure of the chosen metal conductor to the corrosive gas mixture and the second conductor segment covered to protect the metal conductor of this segment from direct attack by the corrosive gas mixture. The covered conductor segment provides a reference for evaluating changes in the uncovered segment. The ratio of the resistance of the exposed segment to that of the covered segment provides a measure of the amount of metal conductor that has reacted with the corrosive gas test environment to form poorly conducting corrosion product, thus providing a measure of test corrosivity. 1.3 Resistance monitoring is applicable to a broad range of test conditions by selection of the appropriate metal conductor and initial metal thickness. 1.4 This method is similar in intent to Test Methods B808. 1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to become familiar with all hazards including those identified in the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for this product/material as provided by the manufacturer, to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices, and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the Wo...

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 Corrosivity monitoring of test environments provides a means to monitor an integrated value of test corrosivity which cannot be evaluated from test parameters themselves, such as temperature, humidity, and gas concentration. As such the monitor value can be used for specification purposes such as test validation. Electrical resistance monitoring of conductors exposed to corrosive media is a well-established practice.3,4,5,6 4.2 The resistance method assumes uniform corrosion over the entire surface of the exposed metal conductor segment. Local corrosion such as pitting, crevice, or grain boundary corrosion may provide invalid estimates of test corrosivity. Marked changes in slope of the curve of electrical resistance ratio versus time may indicate undesired processes which can be due to deficiencies in the test atmosphere or in the monitor itself. 4.3 Because of limitations of the diffusion process within the corrosion product formed on the metal conductor segment of the RM probe when passivating corrosion films are formed, resistance monitoring may not be useful for test chamber monitoring purposes for very long test exposures. Chamber monitoring is dependent on detecting changes in the rate of corrosion of the RM as an indicator signal that specified gas concentrations must be reverified. However, low corrosion rates limit the absolute value of the rate of change of corrosion rate with change of test conditions; for parabolic film growth processes, the growth rate decreases with time limiting the sensitivity of the RM at extended test times. 4.4 Since corrosion rate can be a complex function of test parameters in MFG tests with any given metal primarily responsive to a subset of the gases in the MFG environment, more than one type metal resistance probe is required in order to assist in maintenance of relative gas concentrations. For such test specifications, values of resistance ratios must be referred to ratios obtained under known test conditions a... SCOPE 1.1 This test method provides a means for monitoring corrosivity of environmental tests that involve exposure to corrosive gases. 1.2 This test method uses a resistance monitor (RM) probe fabricated from a chosen metal conductor, with one conductor segment uncovered to permit exposure of the chosen metal conductor to the corrosive gas mixture and the second conductor segment covered to protect the metal conductor of this segment from direct attack by the corrosive gas mixture. The covered conductor segment provides a reference for evaluating changes in the uncovered segment. The ratio of the resistance of the exposed segment to that of the covered segment provides a measure of the amount of metal conductor that has reacted with the corrosive gas test environment to form poorly conducting corrosion product, thus providing a measure of test corrosivity. 1.3 Resistance monitoring is applicable to a broad range of test conditions by selection of the appropriate metal conductor and initial metal thickness. 1.4 This method is similar in intent to Test Methods B808. 1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to become familiar with all hazards including those identified in the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for this product/material as provided by the manufacturer, to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices, and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the Wo...

ASTM B826-09(2020) is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 77.060 - Corrosion of metals. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ASTM B826-09(2020) has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM G96-90(2018), ASTM B827-05(2014), ASTM G96-90(2013), ASTM B810-01a(2011), ASTM B808-10, ASTM B827-05(2009)e2, ASTM B827-05(2009)e1, ASTM G96-90(2008), ASTM B810-01a(2006), ASTM B808-05, ASTM B827-05, ASTM B808-97(2003), ASTM B827-97(2003), ASTM B810-01a, ASTM B810-00. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ASTM B826-09(2020) is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: B826 − 09 (Reapproved 2020)
Standard Test Method for
Monitoring Atmospheric Corrosion Tests by Electrical
Resistance Probes
This standard is issued under the fixed designation B826; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
1.1 This test method provides a means for monitoring
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
corrosivity of environmental tests that involve exposure to
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
corrosive gases.
1.2 This test method uses a resistance monitor (RM) probe 2. Referenced Documents
fabricated from a chosen metal conductor, with one conductor 2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
segment uncovered to permit exposure of the chosen metal
B808 Test Method for Monitoring of Atmospheric Corrosion
conductor to the corrosive gas mixture and the second conduc-
Chambers by Quartz Crystal Microbalances
tor segment covered to protect the metal conductor of this
B810 Test Method for Calibration of Atmospheric Corrosion
segment from direct attack by the corrosive gas mixture. The
Test Chambers by Change in Mass of Copper Coupons
covered conductor segment provides a reference for evaluating
B827 Practice for Conducting Mixed Flowing Gas (MFG)
changes in the uncovered segment. The ratio of the resistance
Environmental Tests
of the exposed segment to that of the covered segment provides
G96 Guide for Online Monitoring of Corrosion in Plant
a measure of the amount of metal conductor that has reacted
Equipment (Electrical and Electrochemical Methods)
with the corrosive gas test environment to form poorly con-
ducting corrosion product, thus providing a measure of test
3. Summary of Test Method
corrosivity.
3.1 The corrosivity of an atmospheric corrosion test such as
1.3 Resistance monitoring is applicable to a broad range of
a mixed flowing gas (MFG) type test is measured by monitor-
test conditions by selection of the appropriate metal conductor ing the loss in electrical conductivity of a metal element whose
and initial metal thickness.
surface corrodes to form poorly conducting corrosion product.
This corrosion product consumes metal from a conduction path
1.4 This method is similar in intent to Test Methods B808.
causing an increase in electrical resistance. The resistance of
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
the degraded conduction path is compared with a similar path
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
whose surface is covered to prevent corrosion. This compari-
standard.
son resistance also provides a temperature correction reference.
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the
The ratio of the electrical resistance of the path exposed to the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
corrosive gases to that of the covered path is monitored during
responsibility of the user of this standard to become familiar
the test and compared to an expected ratio-versus-time curve to
with all hazards including those identified in the appropriate
establish the relationship of the test corrosivity to expected test
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for this product/material
corrosivity. Alternatively, the ratio-versus-time curve for a
as provided by the manufacturer, to establish appropriate
given atmosphere can be compared with the behavior of other
safety, health, and environmental practices, and determine the
corrosive atmospheres to evaluate the relative corrosivity of the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
various atmospheres.
1.7 This international standard was developed in accor-
4. Significance and Use
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
4.1 Corrosivity monitoring of test environments provides a
means to monitor an integrated value of test corrosivity which
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee B02 on
Nonferrous Metals and Alloys and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
B02.05 on Precious Metals and Electrical Contact Materials and Test Methods. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2020. Published October 2020. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 1997. Last previous edition approved in 2015 as B826 – 09 (2015). Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
DOI: 10.1520/B0826-09R20. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
B826 − 09 (2020)
cannot be evaluated from test parameters themselves, such as form of a serpentine pattern or loop to provide a long conductor
temperature, humidity, and gas concentration. As such the path so as to increase the ease of detection of a resistance
monitor value can be used for specification purposes such as change. With such configurations, formation of a corrosion
test validation. Electrical resistance monitoring of conductors product, which grows out from the edges of the conductor
3,4,5,6
exposed to corrosive media is a well-established practice. paths, can contact adjacent paths; when such contacting cor-
rosion films are formed from conducting corrosion products
4.2 The resistance method assumes uniform corrosion over
such as some copper sulfides, abrupt changes in probe resis-
the entire surface of the exposed metal conductor segment.
tance can be observed due to shorting of the current path. Such
Local corrosion such as pitting, crevice, or grain boundary
shorting of the current path can also occur if condensation
corrosion may provide invalid estimates of test corrosivity.
occurs on the probe, especially in the presence of gases that
Marked changes in slope of the curve of electrical resistance
dissolve in the condensed film to form an electrolyte. Such
ratio versus time may indicate undesired processes which can
shorting behavior is seen as an anomalous resistance decrease
be due to deficiencies in the test atmosphere or in the monitor
and indicates that corrosion of the RM is not predictable from
itself.
its electrical resistance.
4.3 Because of limitations of the diffusion process within
5.2 Corrosive gas permeation through the protective cover-
the corrosion product formed on the metal conductor segment
ing of the reference conductor can lead to corrosion of the
of the RM probe when passivating corrosion films are formed,
reference conductor, thus reducing the apparent resistance ratio
resistance monitoring may not be useful for test chamber
between the exposed conductor and the reference conductor.
monitoring purposes for very long test exposures. Chamber
Excess resistance change of the reference conductor above that
monitoring is dependent on detecting changes in the rate of
expected for any observed temperature change of the RM is an
corrosion of the RM as an indicator signal that specified gas
indication of this possible interference. The RM should be
concentrations must be reverified. However, low corrosion
examined after the test for discoloration of the reference
rates limit the absolute value of the rate of change of corrosion
conductor as a signal of possible corrosion of the reference
rate with change of test conditions; for parabolic film growth
conductor when such excess resistance change is observed.
processes, the growth rate decreases with time limiting the
Presence of corrosion of the reference conductor invalidates
sensitivity of the RM at extended test times.
the estimate of atmosphere corrosivity based on the observed
4.4 Since corrosion rate can be a complex function of test
resistance ratio-versus-time curve.
parameters in MFG tests with any given metal primarily
5.3 Thermal gradients across the RM probe as a result of the
responsive to a subset of the gases in the MFG environment,
presence of local heat sources such as lamps or powered test
more than one type metal resistance probe is required in order
devices can produce an anomalous resistance ratio change.
to assist in maintenance of relative gas concentrations. For
Such effects can be verified by shutting off the local heat source
such test specifications, values of resistance ratios must be
and remeasuring the resistance ratio.
referred to ratios obtained under known test conditions as
supplied by the test specifier. Information relating to the 5.4 Scratches or other localized conductor thickness varia-
sensitivity of various metals to various corrodants has been
tions can produce anomalous resistance ratios after reduced
7,8
published.
corrosion exposures. This behavior can be detected by abrupt
increases in apparent rate of corrosion which occur when the
4.5 RM probes can be useful from 1 % of thickness con-
thinned region corrodes through to the dielectric substrate.
sumed upward to 50 % of thickness consumed by the corrosion
Such abrupt changes indicate the end of useful data from the
film growth. Conductor thicknesses between 25 nm and 0.2
RM.
mm have been reported and common sizes are available
commercially.
5.5 Contaminant films on the surface of the exposed con-
ductor can inhibit corrosion or accelerate corrosion. Care must
5. Interferences
be taken to assure freedom from fingerprints, spittle, oil, or
other surface contamination prior to installation in the test
5.1 Resistance monitor probes are generally constructed
chamber. If a cleaning procedure is used, it should be appro-
from thin film metal coatings on dielectric substrates in the
priately evaluated and consistently applied to avoid differing
initial conditions on the RM. The exposed metal conductor of
3 the probe should be examined after the test exposure to ensure
ASTM G96, Guide for On-Line Monitoring of Corrosion in Plant Equipment
(Electrical and Electrochemical Methods).
uniformity of corrosion film growth. Clumps of corrosion
Allen, R. C. and Trzeciak, M. J., “Measuring Environmental Corrosivity,”
product indicate undesirable conditions and potential problems
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Components, Hybrids, and Manu-
interpreting resistance changes.
facturing Technology Transaction, Vol CHMT-3, 1, March 1980, pp. 67-70.
Murcko, R., Corros
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...