Standard Test Methods for Comparison of Waterborne Petroleum Oils by Gas Chromatography

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Identification of a recovered oil is determined by comparison with known oils, selected because of their possible relationship to the particular recovered oil. The known oils are collected from suspected sources. Samples of such known oils must be collected and submitted along with the unknown for analysis. At present, identification of the source of an unknown oil by itself cannot be made (for example, from a library of known oils).
The use of a flame-photometric detector in addition to the flame-ionization detector provides a second, independent profile of the same oil, that is, significantly more information is available from a single analysis with dual detection.
Many close similarities (within uncertainties of sampling and analysis) will be needed to establish identity beyond a reasonable doubt. The analyses described will distinguish many, but not all samples. For cases in which this method does not clearly identify a pair of samples, and for important cases where additional comparisons are needed to strengthen conclusions, other analyses will be required (refer to Practice D 3415). In particular, Practice D 5739 is useful for such cases.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the comparison of petroleum oils recovered from water or beaches with oils from suspect sources by means of gas chromatography (1, 2, 3). Such oils include distillate fuel, lubricating oil, and crude oil. The test method described is for capillary column analyses using either single detection (flame ionization) or dual detection (flame ionization and flame photometric) for sulfur containing species.
1.2 This test method provides high resolution for critical examination of fine structure that is resistant to weathering. The flame-photometric detection for sulfur components is an adjunct, not a substitute, for flame-ionization detection in the identification of waterborne petroleum oils  (). For this reason, flame photometric detection is optional.
This standard does not purport to address the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
14-Aug-2006
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D3328-06 - Standard Test Methods for Comparison of Waterborne Petroleum Oils by Gas Chromatography
English language
7 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D3328 − 06
StandardTest Methods for
Comparison of Waterborne Petroleum Oils by Gas
1
Chromatography
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D3328; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope D3415 Practice for Identification of Waterborne Oils
D4489 Practices for Sampling of Waterborne Oils
1.1 This test method covers the comparison of petroleum
D5739 Practice for Oil Spill Source Identification by Gas
oils recovered from water or beaches with oils from suspect
2 Chromatography and Positive Ion Electron Impact Low
sources by means of gas chromatography (1, 2, 3). Such oils
Resolution Mass Spectrometry
include distillate fuel, lubricating oil, and crude oil. The test
E355 Practice for Gas ChromatographyTerms and Relation-
method described is for capillary column analyses using either
ships
single detection (flame ionization) or dual detection (flame
ionization and flame photometric) for sulfur containing spe-
3. Terminology
cies.
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms used in this test
1.2 This test method provides high resolution for critical
method, refer to Practice D3415, Terminology D1129, and
examination of fine structure that is resistant to weathering.
Practice E355.
The flame-photometric detection for sulfur components is an
adjunct, not a substitute, for flame-ionization detection in the
4. Significance and Use
identification of waterborne petroleum oils (4-12). For this
4.1 Identification of a recovered oil is determined by com-
reason, flame photometric detection is optional.
parison with known oils, selected because of their possible
1.3 This standard does not purport to address the safety
relationship to the particular recovered oil. The known oils are
concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
collected from suspected sources. Samples of such known oils
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and
must be collected and submitted along with the unknown for
health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
analysis.At present, identification of the source of an unknown
limitations prior to use.
oil by itself cannot be made (for example, from a library of
known oils).
2. Referenced Documents
4.2 The use of a flame-photometric detector in addition to
3
2.1 ASTM Standards:
the flame-ionization detector provides a second, independent
D1129 Terminology Relating to Water
profileofthesameoil,thatis,significantlymoreinformationis
D1193 Specification for Reagent Water
available from a single analysis with dual detection.
D2549 Test Method for Separation of Representative Aro-
4.3 Many close similarities (within uncertainties of sam-
matics and Nonaromatics Fractions of High-Boiling Oils
pling and analysis) will be needed to establish identity beyond
by Elution Chromatography
a reasonable doubt. The analyses described will distinguish
D3325 Practice for Preservation of Waterborne Oil Samples
many, but not all samples. For cases in which this method does
D3326 Practice for Preparation of Samples for Identification
not clearly identify a pair of samples, and for important cases
of Waterborne Oils
where additional comparisons are needed to strengthen
conclusions, other analyses will be required (refer to Practice
1
These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D19 on
D3415). In particular, Practice D5739 is useful for such cases.
Waterand are the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D19.06 on Methods for
Analysis for Organic Substances in Water.
5. Interferences
Current edition approved Aug. 15, 2006. Published August 2006. Originally
approved in 1974. Last previous edition approved in 2000 as D3328 – 00. DOI:
5.1 Compounds that have the same retention time as petro-
10.1520/D3328-06.
2
leum hydrocarbons will interfere in the comparison of the
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the references at the end of these
test methods.
unknownwithknownoils.Thisisparticularlytrueifanimalfat
3
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
or vegetable oil, naturally occurring hydrocarbons, or spill-
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
treatment chemicals are present in relatively large amounts.
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website. Independent analysis, for example, infrared spectroscopy, will
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

--------
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.