Standard Test Methods for Detecting Detrimental Intermetallic Phase in Duplex Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels

ABSTRACT
These test methods cover the detection of detrimental intermetallic phase in duplex austenitic/ferritic stainless steel to the extent that toughness and corrosion resistance is affected significantly. These test methods will not necessarily detect losses of toughness or corrosion resistance attributable to other causes. Test method A-sodium hydroxide etch test, test method B-Charpy impact test, and test method C-ferric chloride corrosion test shall be made for classification of structures of duplex stainless steels.
SCOPE
1.1 The purpose of these test methods is to allow detection of the presence of intermetallic phases in certain duplex stainless steels as listed in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 to the extent that toughness or corrosion resistance is affected significantly. These test methods will not necessarily detect losses of toughness or corrosion resistance attributable to other causes. Similar test methods for other duplex stainless steels are described in Test Method A1084, but the procedures described in this standard differ significantly from Test Methods A, B, and C in A1084.  
1.2 Duplex (austenitic-ferritic) stainless steels are susceptible to the formation of intermetallic compounds during exposures in the temperature range from approximately 600 to 1750 °F (320 to 955 °C). The speed of these precipitation reactions is a function of composition and thermal or thermomechanical history of each individual piece. The presence of these phases is detrimental to toughness and corrosion resistance.  
1.3 Correct heat treatment of duplex stainless steels can eliminate these detrimental phases. Rapid cooling of the product provides the maximum resistance to formation of detrimental phases by subsequent thermal exposures.  
1.4 Compliance with the chemical and mechanical requirements for the applicable product specification does not necessarily indicate the absence of detrimental phases in the product.  
1.5 These test methods include the following:  
1.5.1 Test Method A—Sodium Hydroxide Etch Test for Classification of Etch Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 3 – 7).  
1.5.2 Test Method B—Charpy Impact Test for Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 8 – 13).  
1.5.3 Test Method C—Ferric Chloride Corrosion Test for Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 14 – 20).  
1.6 The presence of detrimental intermetallic phases is readily detected in all three tests, provided that a sample of appropriate location and orientation is selected. Because the occurrence of intermetallic phases is a function of temperature and cooling rate, it is essential that the tests be applied to the region of the material experiencing the conditions most likely to promote the formation of an intermetallic phase. In the case of common heat treatment, this region will be that which cooled most slowly. Except for rapidly cooled material, it may be necessary to sample from a location determined to be the most slowly cooled for the material piece to be characterized.  
1.7 The tests do not determine the precise nature of the detrimental phase but rather the presence or absence of an intermetallic phase to the extent that it is detrimental to the toughness and corrosion resistance of the material.  
1.8 Examples of the correlation of thermal exposures, the occurrence of intermetallic phases, and the degradation of toughness and corrosion resistance are given in Appendix X1 and Appendix X2.  
1.9 The values stated in either inch-pound or SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.  
1.10 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.11 This internat...

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
14-May-2023

Relations

Effective Date
01-Mar-2024
Effective Date
01-Jul-2019
Effective Date
15-Nov-2017
Effective Date
01-Jan-2017
Effective Date
01-Nov-2015
Effective Date
01-May-2015
Effective Date
15-May-2014
Effective Date
15-Nov-2013
Effective Date
01-Jun-2013
Effective Date
15-Oct-2012
Effective Date
15-Mar-2012
Effective Date
15-Nov-2011
Effective Date
01-Sep-2011
Effective Date
15-Jun-2010
Effective Date
01-Jun-2009

Overview

ASTM A923-23 is a widely recognized standard developed by ASTM International, detailing test methods for detecting detrimental intermetallic phases in duplex austenitic/ferritic stainless steels. The presence of intermetallic compounds in these steels can significantly reduce both toughness and corrosion resistance. Established procedures in this standard help manufacturers and users verify material suitability and quality for sensitive applications, particularly where mechanical performance and resistance to corrosion are critical. The standard outlines three key test methods-sodium hydroxide etch, Charpy impact, and ferric chloride corrosion tests-that are essential tools in the quality control and assurance processes for duplex stainless steels.

Key Topics

  • Detection of Intermetallic Phases
    Duplex stainless steels are prone to form intermetallic phases-such as sigma phase-when exposed to specific temperature ranges (approximately 600 to 1750 °F / 320 to 955 °C). The rate of phase precipitation depends on the steel’s composition and its thermal/mechanical history.

  • Test Methods in ASTM A923-23

    • Sodium Hydroxide Etch Test (Test Method A): Used as a rapid screening method, this test helps identify unaffected structures and flag potential issues before more extensive testing.
    • Charpy Impact Test (Test Method B): Assesses toughness and detects significant reductions due to the presence of intermetallic phases.
    • Ferric Chloride Corrosion Test (Test Method C): Measures loss in corrosion resistance attributed to intermetallic precipitation under controlled laboratory conditions.
  • Sampling and Test Application
    Tests are performed on samples most likely to contain detrimental phases, typically those cooled most slowly after heat treatment. Selecting appropriate locations and orientations of samples is critical for accurate results.

  • Heat Treatment Implications
    Proper heat treatment, particularly rapid cooling, is vital in preventing the formation of harmful intermetallic compounds in duplex stainless steels.

Applications

  • Quality Control and Material Qualification
    Manufacturers utilize ASTM A923-23 to ensure that duplex stainless steel products meet stringent performance requirements for toughness and corrosion resistance. Passing these tests is vital for materials destined for demanding environments.

  • Industrial Sectors
    Common industries relying on this standard include:

    • Chemical processing
    • Oil and gas
    • Power generation
    • Marine engineering
    • Pulp and paper processing
  • Welded Structures and Castings
    The standard applies to both mill-produced and cast products, as well as welded structures, addressing the unique challenges in each product form.

  • Specification Compliance
    While compliance with product specifications does not guarantee the absence of detrimental phases, ASTM A923-23 provides the accepted methods to evaluate and demonstrate material quality beyond basic chemical and mechanical criteria.

Related Standards

  • ASTM A1084: Methods for detecting detrimental phases in lean duplex austenitic/ferritic stainless steels.
  • ASTM A370: Mechanical testing methods for steel products, referenced for the Charpy impact test procedures.
  • ASTM G48: Test methods for pitting and crevice corrosion resistance using ferric chloride solution.

Using ASTM A923-23 ensures the delivery of duplex stainless steel components with optimal toughness and corrosion resistance by providing reliable methods for the detection of harmful intermetallic phases, making it essential for industries with demanding performance and safety requirements.

Buy Documents

Standard

ASTM A923-23 - Standard Test Methods for Detecting Detrimental Intermetallic Phase in Duplex Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels

English language (10 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off
Standard

REDLINE ASTM A923-23 - Standard Test Methods for Detecting Detrimental Intermetallic Phase in Duplex Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels

English language (10 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

Element Materials Technology

Materials testing and product certification.

UKAS United Kingdom Verified

Inštitut za kovinske materiale in tehnologije

Institute of Metals and Technology. Materials testing, metallurgical analysis, NDT.

SA Slovenia Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

ASTM A923-23 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Test Methods for Detecting Detrimental Intermetallic Phase in Duplex Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels". This standard covers: ABSTRACT These test methods cover the detection of detrimental intermetallic phase in duplex austenitic/ferritic stainless steel to the extent that toughness and corrosion resistance is affected significantly. These test methods will not necessarily detect losses of toughness or corrosion resistance attributable to other causes. Test method A-sodium hydroxide etch test, test method B-Charpy impact test, and test method C-ferric chloride corrosion test shall be made for classification of structures of duplex stainless steels. SCOPE 1.1 The purpose of these test methods is to allow detection of the presence of intermetallic phases in certain duplex stainless steels as listed in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 to the extent that toughness or corrosion resistance is affected significantly. These test methods will not necessarily detect losses of toughness or corrosion resistance attributable to other causes. Similar test methods for other duplex stainless steels are described in Test Method A1084, but the procedures described in this standard differ significantly from Test Methods A, B, and C in A1084. 1.2 Duplex (austenitic-ferritic) stainless steels are susceptible to the formation of intermetallic compounds during exposures in the temperature range from approximately 600 to 1750 °F (320 to 955 °C). The speed of these precipitation reactions is a function of composition and thermal or thermomechanical history of each individual piece. The presence of these phases is detrimental to toughness and corrosion resistance. 1.3 Correct heat treatment of duplex stainless steels can eliminate these detrimental phases. Rapid cooling of the product provides the maximum resistance to formation of detrimental phases by subsequent thermal exposures. 1.4 Compliance with the chemical and mechanical requirements for the applicable product specification does not necessarily indicate the absence of detrimental phases in the product. 1.5 These test methods include the following: 1.5.1 Test Method A—Sodium Hydroxide Etch Test for Classification of Etch Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 3 – 7). 1.5.2 Test Method B—Charpy Impact Test for Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 8 – 13). 1.5.3 Test Method C—Ferric Chloride Corrosion Test for Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 14 – 20). 1.6 The presence of detrimental intermetallic phases is readily detected in all three tests, provided that a sample of appropriate location and orientation is selected. Because the occurrence of intermetallic phases is a function of temperature and cooling rate, it is essential that the tests be applied to the region of the material experiencing the conditions most likely to promote the formation of an intermetallic phase. In the case of common heat treatment, this region will be that which cooled most slowly. Except for rapidly cooled material, it may be necessary to sample from a location determined to be the most slowly cooled for the material piece to be characterized. 1.7 The tests do not determine the precise nature of the detrimental phase but rather the presence or absence of an intermetallic phase to the extent that it is detrimental to the toughness and corrosion resistance of the material. 1.8 Examples of the correlation of thermal exposures, the occurrence of intermetallic phases, and the degradation of toughness and corrosion resistance are given in Appendix X1 and Appendix X2. 1.9 The values stated in either inch-pound or SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only. 1.10 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.11 This internat...

ABSTRACT These test methods cover the detection of detrimental intermetallic phase in duplex austenitic/ferritic stainless steel to the extent that toughness and corrosion resistance is affected significantly. These test methods will not necessarily detect losses of toughness or corrosion resistance attributable to other causes. Test method A-sodium hydroxide etch test, test method B-Charpy impact test, and test method C-ferric chloride corrosion test shall be made for classification of structures of duplex stainless steels. SCOPE 1.1 The purpose of these test methods is to allow detection of the presence of intermetallic phases in certain duplex stainless steels as listed in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 to the extent that toughness or corrosion resistance is affected significantly. These test methods will not necessarily detect losses of toughness or corrosion resistance attributable to other causes. Similar test methods for other duplex stainless steels are described in Test Method A1084, but the procedures described in this standard differ significantly from Test Methods A, B, and C in A1084. 1.2 Duplex (austenitic-ferritic) stainless steels are susceptible to the formation of intermetallic compounds during exposures in the temperature range from approximately 600 to 1750 °F (320 to 955 °C). The speed of these precipitation reactions is a function of composition and thermal or thermomechanical history of each individual piece. The presence of these phases is detrimental to toughness and corrosion resistance. 1.3 Correct heat treatment of duplex stainless steels can eliminate these detrimental phases. Rapid cooling of the product provides the maximum resistance to formation of detrimental phases by subsequent thermal exposures. 1.4 Compliance with the chemical and mechanical requirements for the applicable product specification does not necessarily indicate the absence of detrimental phases in the product. 1.5 These test methods include the following: 1.5.1 Test Method A—Sodium Hydroxide Etch Test for Classification of Etch Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 3 – 7). 1.5.2 Test Method B—Charpy Impact Test for Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 8 – 13). 1.5.3 Test Method C—Ferric Chloride Corrosion Test for Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 14 – 20). 1.6 The presence of detrimental intermetallic phases is readily detected in all three tests, provided that a sample of appropriate location and orientation is selected. Because the occurrence of intermetallic phases is a function of temperature and cooling rate, it is essential that the tests be applied to the region of the material experiencing the conditions most likely to promote the formation of an intermetallic phase. In the case of common heat treatment, this region will be that which cooled most slowly. Except for rapidly cooled material, it may be necessary to sample from a location determined to be the most slowly cooled for the material piece to be characterized. 1.7 The tests do not determine the precise nature of the detrimental phase but rather the presence or absence of an intermetallic phase to the extent that it is detrimental to the toughness and corrosion resistance of the material. 1.8 Examples of the correlation of thermal exposures, the occurrence of intermetallic phases, and the degradation of toughness and corrosion resistance are given in Appendix X1 and Appendix X2. 1.9 The values stated in either inch-pound or SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only. 1.10 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.11 This internat...

ASTM A923-23 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 77.040.99 - Other methods of testing of metals. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ASTM A923-23 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM A370-24, ASTM A370-19, ASTM A370-17a, ASTM A370-17, ASTM A370-15, ASTM A1084-15, ASTM A370-14, ASTM A370-13, ASTM A1084-13, ASTM A370-12a, ASTM A370-12, ASTM A370-11a, ASTM G48-11, ASTM A370-10, ASTM A370-09a. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ASTM A923-23 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: A923 − 23
Standard Test Methods for
Detecting Detrimental Intermetallic Phase in Duplex
Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels
This standard is issued under the fixed designation A923; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope* 1.6 The presence of detrimental intermetallic phases is
readily detected in all three tests, provided that a sample of
1.1 The purpose of these test methods is to allow detection
appropriate location and orientation is selected. Because the
of the presence of intermetallic phases in certain duplex
occurrence of intermetallic phases is a function of temperature
stainless steels as listed in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 to the
and cooling rate, it is essential that the tests be applied to the
extent that toughness or corrosion resistance is affected signifi-
region of the material experiencing the conditions most likely
cantly. These test methods will not necessarily detect losses of
to promote the formation of an intermetallic phase. In the case
toughness or corrosion resistance attributable to other causes.
of common heat treatment, this region will be that which
Similar test methods for other duplex stainless steels are
cooled most slowly. Except for rapidly cooled material, it may
described in Test Method A1084, but the procedures described
be necessary to sample from a location determined to be the
in this standard differ significantly from Test Methods A, B,
most slowly cooled for the material piece to be characterized.
and C in A1084.
1.7 The tests do not determine the precise nature of the
1.2 Duplex (austenitic-ferritic) stainless steels are suscep-
detrimental phase but rather the presence or absence of an
tible to the formation of intermetallic compounds during
intermetallic phase to the extent that it is detrimental to the
exposures in the temperature range from approximately 600 to
toughness and corrosion resistance of the material.
1750 °F (320 to 955 °C). The speed of these precipitation
reactions is a function of composition and thermal or thermo- 1.8 Examples of the correlation of thermal exposures, the
mechanical history of each individual piece. The presence of occurrence of intermetallic phases, and the degradation of
these phases is detrimental to toughness and corrosion resis- toughness and corrosion resistance are given in Appendix X1
tance. and Appendix X2.
1.3 Correct heat treatment of duplex stainless steels can 1.9 The values stated in either inch-pound or SI units are to
eliminate these detrimental phases. Rapid cooling of the be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses
product provides the maximum resistance to formation of are for information only.
detrimental phases by subsequent thermal exposures.
1.10 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
1.4 Compliance with the chemical and mechanical require-
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
ments for the applicable product specification does not neces-
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
sarily indicate the absence of detrimental phases in the product.
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 These test methods include the following:
1.11 This international standard was developed in accor-
1.5.1 Test Method A—Sodium Hydroxide Etch Test for
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
Classification of Etch Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
(Sections 3 – 7).
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
1.5.2 Test Method B—Charpy Impact Test for Classification
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 8 – 13).
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
1.5.3 Test Method C—Ferric Chloride Corrosion Test for
Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sec-
2. Referenced Documents
tions 14 – 20).
2.1 ASTM Standards:
These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee A01 on
Steel, Stainless Steel and Related Alloysand are the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee A01.14 on Methods of Corrosion Testing. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved May 15, 2023. Published June 2023. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 1994. Last previous edition approved in 2022 as A923 – 22. DOI: Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
10.1520/A0923-23. the ASTM website.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
A923 − 23
A370 Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing 4.3 Variable Resistance (see Note 1).
of Steel Products
4.4 Cathode—A cylindrical piece of conductive metal.
A1084 Test Method for Detecting Detrimental Phases in
4.5 Large Electric Clamp, to hold the specimen to be
Lean Duplex Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels
etched.
G48 Test Methods for Pitting and Crevice Corrosion Resis-
tance of Stainless Steels and Related Alloys by Use of
4.6 Metallurgical Microscope, for examination of etched
Ferric Chloride Solution
microstructures to 400 to 500 diameters.
4.7 Electrodes of the Etching Cell—The specimen to be
TEST METHOD A—SODIUM HYDROXIDE ETCH
etched is made the anode, and a cylindrical piece of metal as
TEST FOR CLASSIFICATION OF ETCH
large as the specimen to be etched is made the cathode.
STRUCTURES OF DUPLEX STAINLESS STEELS
4.8 Electrolyte, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), reagent grade.
3. Scope
NOTE 1—The variable resistance and ammeter are placed in the circuit
3.1 The sodium hydroxide etch test may be used for the
to measure and control the current on the specimen to be etched.
acceptance of material but not for rejection. This test method
may be used with other evaluation tests to provide a rapid
5. Preparation of Test Specimens
method for identifying those specimens that are free of
5.1 For mill products, examination shall be made on a
detrimental intermetallic phases as measured in these other
longitudinal or transverse section. For cast products, examina-
tests.
tion shall be made on a separately cast test coupon which was
3.2 The sodium hydroxide etch test may be used to screen
heat treated in the same furnace load as the casting it
specimens intended for testing in Test Method B, Charpy
represents. Unless otherwise specified, selection of the test
Impact Test for Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless
coupon size shall be at the discretion of the producer. Because
Steels, and in Test Method C, Ferric Chloride Corrosion Test
high temperature or mechanical deformation associated with
for Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels.
particular cutting processes may alter the structure of the steel,
3.3 Reference photomicrographs are provided to show clas- the cutting of the test specimen should be by a technique that
sifications of etch structures of a particular stainless steel type prevents these effects. Alternatively, after the specimens are
that are equivalent to acceptable or to possibly unacceptable cut, any material that may have been affected by high tempera-
performance for each practice. When Test Method A is used as ture or deformation associated with the cutting should be
a screening test for Test Method B or Test Method C, removed by machining or wet grinding prior to testing.
specimens having acceptable etch structures need not be
5.2 For mill products, the specimen should allow for a
subjected to Test Method B or Test Method C.
survey across the full thickness of the section or, in the case of
3.4 Table 1 indicates the applicability and acceptance crite- a heavy section, a survey from one surface through the
ria for Test Method A. When Test Method A is specified as an mid-thickness of the section. The specimen shall include the
acceptance test, specimens having other than acceptable etch mid-thickness.
structures may, at the option of the producer, be tested by Test
5.3 For cast materials, the specimen shall be taken at
Method B or Test Method C.
approximately 1/4T.
3.5 The steel shall be tested in the final solution heat treated
5.4 Polishing—On all materials, cross-sectional surfaces
condition or such other conditions as are agreed upon between
should be polished to a metallographic finish suitable for
the producer and the user.
examination at 400× after etching. Specimens containing welds
should include base metal, weld heat–affected zone, and weld
4. Apparatus
metal. The area to be etched may be prepared by grinding to an
4.1 Source of Direct Current—Battery, generator, or rectifier
80- or 120-grit finish on a grinding belt or wheel without
capable of supplying approximately 15 V and 20 A.
excessive heating and then by polishing on successively finer
1 1 2 3
emery papers, No. 1, ⁄2, ⁄0, ⁄0, ⁄0, and finer. Other methods of
4.2 Ammeter—Range from 0 to 30 A (see Note 1).
polishing may be acceptable.
5.5 Etching Solution—The solution for etching is prepared
TABLE 1 Applicability and Acceptance Criteria for
by adding 40 g of reagent grade sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to
Test Method A
100 g of distilled water.
Acceptable Nonacceptable
Grade
Etch Structure Etch Structure
5.6 Etching Conditions—The polished specimen should be
S82441, S31803, unaffected possibly affected
etched at approximately 1 to 3 V dc, for 5 to 60 s (see Note 2).
S32205, S32750, structure (Fig. 1, structure (Fig. 3, Fig. 4)
S32760, Fig. 2)
NOTE 2—When etching is performed at 1 to 3 V dc with a platinum
S32550,S32520,
cathode for 5 to 60 s, any intermetallic phase is revealed by yellow, then
J92205, J93404
brown, staining, followed by staining of the ferrite.
affected structure (Fig. 5,
Fig. 6)
5.7 Rinsing—Following etching, the specimen should be
centerline structure (Fig.
rinsed thoroughly in hot water and in acetone or alcohol,
7)
followed by air drying.
A923 − 23
6. Classification of Etch Structures
6.1 The etched surface shall be examined on a metallurgical
microscope at 400 to 500×.
6.2 The etched cross-sectional areas should be examined
thoroughly by complete traverse of the full sample and across
all zones such as weld metal, weld-affected zones, and base
metal on specimens containing welds.
6.3 The etch structures are classified into the following
types:
6.3.1 Unaffected Structure (Fig. 1, Fig. 2)—The ferrite has
been etched without revelation of intermetallic phase. The
interphase boundaries are smooth.
6.3.2 Possibly Affected Structure (Fig. 3, Fig. 4)—The
ferrite has been etched with isolated indications of possible
intermetallic phase. The interphase boundaries may show a fine
waviness.
6.3.3 Affected Structure (Fig. 5, Fig. 6)—The indications of
FIG. 2 (a) J92205: Unaffected Structure-Statically Cast (400× Mag-
an intermetallic phase are readily revealed before or simulta-
nification)
neously with the staining of the ferrite during etching.
FIG. 2 (b) J92205: Unaffected Structure-Centrifugally Cast (400×
Magnification) (continued)
6.3.4 Centerline Structure (Fig. 7)—An intermetallic phase
is observed as a continuous or semi-continuous phase in the
mid-thickness region of the product, with or without the
affected structure outside of the mid-thickness region, indica-
tive of segregation.
7. Interpretation and Use of the Etch Structure
Classifications
7.1 When Test Method A is used as a screening test, the use
of these etch structures depends on the test method for which
the specimens are being screened. Important characteristics of
each of the test methods are described as follows.
7.2 Test Method B—The Charpy impact test detects reduc-
tions in toughness from that of the optimal composition and
processing. Such reductions may be attributable to intermetal-
FIG. 1 Unaffected Structure in S31803: (a) Longitudinal Section
lic phases or to other causes not necessarily detectable by Test
and (b) Transverse Section (500× Magnification Before Reproduc-
tion) Method A. A Possibly Affected Structure is likely to be
A923 − 23
FIG. 4 (a) J92205: Possibly Affected Structure-Statically Cast
(400× Magnification)
FIG. 3 Possibly Affected Structure in S31803: (a) Longitudinal
Section and (b) Transverse Section (500× Magnification Before
Reproduction)
FIG. 4 (b) J92205: Possibly Affected Structure-Centrifugally Cast
associated with a loss of Charpy impact toughness ranging
(400× Magnification) (continued)
from slight to severe. An Affected Structure is associated with
a severe loss of Charpy impact toughness. A Centerline
Structure may or may not be detected by a Charpy test,
TEST METHOD B—CHARPY IMPACT TEST FOR
depending on the orientation of the Charpy specimen.
CLASSIFICATION OF STRUCTURES OF
DUPLEX STAINLESS STEELS
7.3 Test Method C—The ferric chloride corrosion test is a
24-h test in 10 % ferric chloride. It will detect a loss of
8. Scope
corrosion resistance associated with local depletion of chro-
mium and molybdenum as a result of the precipitation of 8.1 This test method describes the procedure for conducting
chromium-rich and possibly molybdenum-rich phases, not the Charpy impact test as a method of detecting the precipita-
tion of detrimental intermetallic phases in duplex stainless
limited to intermetallic phases. An Affected Structure is asso-
ciated with significant weight loss in the corrosion test. A steels. The presence or absence of an indication of intermetallic
Possibly Affected Structure is likely to be associated with phase in this test is not necessarily a measure of performance
significant weight loss in the corrosion test. of the material in service with regard to any property other than
A923 − 23
FIG. 7 S31803: Longitudinal Section (500× Magnification Before
Reproduction)
that measured directly. The Charpy procedure as here applied
is different from that as commonly applied for the determina-
tion of toughness and should not be used when characterization
of material toughness is the purpose of the testing.
8.2 The Charpy impact test may be used to evaluate mill and
cast products, provided that it is possible to obtain a specimen
of relevant location and geometry.
8.3 Table 2 indicates the applicability and acceptance crite-
ria for Test Method B.
9. Rapid Screening Test
9.1 Before testing by the Charpy impact test, specimens of
the steel may be given a rapid screening test in accordance with
the procedures of Test Method A, Sodium Hydroxide Etch Test
FIG. 5 Affected Structure in 8a S31803: (a) Longitudinal Section
for Classification of Etch Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels.
and (b) Transverse Section (500× Magnification Before Reproduc-
tion) Preparation, etching, and the classification of etch structures
are described therein. Specimens having an etch structure
described as Unaffected Structure in Test Method A will be
essentially free of detrimental effect on impact toughness
TABLE 2 Applicability and Acceptance Criteria for
Test Method B
Test Minimum Impact
Grade Condition
A
Temperature Energy
A
S82441 base metal –40 °F (–40 °C) 40 ft-lb (54 J)
A
S31803, base metal –40 °F (–40 °C) 40 ft-lb (54 J)
S32205,
J92205
A
heat-affected –40 °F (–40 °C) 40 ft-lb (54 J)
zone
A
weld metal –40 °F (–40 °C) 25 ft-lb (34 J)
B
S32750, base metal –40 °F (–40 °C)
S32760
A
J93404 base metal –50 °F (–46 °C) 40 ft-lb (54 J)
A
Energy for a full-size specimen. Required energy for a subsize specimen is
reduced in direct proportion to the reduced area of the subsize specimen relative
to that of the full-size specimen. Test may be conducted at a temperature below the
specified temperature.
B
The acceptable minimum impact energy shall be agreed upon by seller and
FIG. 6 J92205: Affected Structure (400× Magnification)
purchaser.
A923 − 23
related to the formation of intermetallic phase. Other mecha- TEST METHOD C—FERRIC CHLORIDE
nisms for loss of toughness may occur independently but are CORROSION TEST FOR CLASSIFICATION OF
beyond the scope of this test method. Specimens showing STRUCTURES OF DUPLEX
Unaffected Structure in Test Method A are acceptable with STAINLESS STEELS
respect to the absence of intermetallic phases, without the
14. Scope
necessity of performing the Charpy test as described in Test
Method B. All specimens having other than Unaffected Struc-
14.
...


This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: A923 − 22 A923 − 23
Standard Test Methods for
Detecting Detrimental Intermetallic Phase in Duplex
Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels
This standard is issued under the fixed designation A923; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope*
1.1 The purpose of these test methods is to allow detection of the presence of intermetallic phases in certain duplex stainless steels
as listed in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 to the extent that toughness or corrosion resistance is affected significantly. These test
methods will not necessarily detect losses of toughness or corrosion resistance attributable to other causes. Similar test methods
for other duplex stainless steels are described in Test Method A1084, but the procedures described in this standard differ
significantly from Test Methods A, B, and C in A1084.
1.2 Duplex (austenitic-ferritic) stainless steels are susceptible to the formation of intermetallic compounds during exposures in the
temperature range from approximately 600 to 1750 °F (320 to 955 °C). The speed of these precipitation reactions is a function of
composition and thermal or thermomechanical history of each individual piece. The presence of these phases is detrimental to
toughness and corrosion resistance.
1.3 Correct heat treatment of duplex stainless steels can eliminate these detrimental phases. Rapid cooling of the product provides
the maximum resistance to formation of detrimental phases by subsequent thermal exposures.
1.4 Compliance with the chemical and mechanical requirements for the applicable product specification does not necessarily
indicate the absence of detrimental phases in the product.
1.5 These test methods include the following:
1.5.1 Test Method A—Sodium Hydroxide Etch Test for Classification of Etch Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 3 –
7).
1.5.2 Test Method B—Charpy Impact Test for Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 8 – 13).
1.5.3 Test Method C—Ferric Chloride Corrosion Test for Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels (Sections 14 – 20).
1.6 The presence of detrimental intermetallic phases is readily detected in all three tests, provided that a sample of appropriate
location and orientation is selected. Because the occurrence of intermetallic phases is a function of temperature and cooling rate,
it is essential that the tests be applied to the region of the material experiencing the conditions most likely to promote the formation
These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee A01 on Steel, Stainless Steel and Related Alloysand are the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
A01.14 on Methods of Corrosion Testing.
Current edition approved June 1, 2022May 15, 2023. Published June 2022June 2023. Originally approved in 1994. Last previous edition approved in 20142022 as
A923 – 14.A923 – 22. DOI: 10.1520/A0923-22.10.1520/A0923-23.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
A923 − 23
of an intermetallic phase. In the case of common heat treatment, this region will be that which cooled most slowly. Except for
rapidly cooled material, it may be necessary to sample from a location determined to be the most slowly cooled for the material
piece to be characterized.
1.7 The tests do not determine the precise nature of the detrimental phase but rather the presence or absence of an intermetallic
phase to the extent that it is detrimental to the toughness and corrosion resistance of the material.
1.8 Examples of the correlation of thermal exposures, the occurrence of intermetallic phases, and the degradation of toughness and
corrosion resistance are given in Appendix X1 and Appendix X2.
1.9 The values stated in either inch-pound or SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for
information only.
1.10 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.11 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
A370 Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products
A1084 Test Method for Detecting Detrimental Phases in Lean Duplex Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels
G48 Test Methods for Pitting and Crevice Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels and Related Alloys by Use of Ferric Chloride
Solution
TEST METHOD A—SODIUM HYDROXIDE ETCH TEST FOR CLASSIFICATION OF ETCH STRUCTURES OF
DUPLEX STAINLESS STEELS
3. Scope
3.1 The sodium hydroxide etch test may be used for the acceptance of material but not for rejection. This test method may be used
with other evaluation tests to provide a rapid method for identifying those specimens that are free of detrimental intermetallic
phases as measured in these other tests.
3.2 The sodium hydroxide etch test may be used to screen specimens intended for testing in Test Method B, Charpy Impact Test
for Classification of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels, and in Test Method C, Ferric Chloride Corrosion Test for Classification
of Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels.
3.3 Reference photomicrographs are provided to show classifications of etch structures of a particular stainless steel type that are
equivalent to acceptable or to possibly unacceptable performance for each practice. When Test Method A is used as a screening
test for Test Method B or Test Method C, specimens having acceptable etch structures need not be subjected to Test Method B or
Test Method C.
3.4 Table 1 indicates the applicability and acceptance criteria for Test Method A. When Test Method A is specified as an
acceptance test, specimens having other than acceptable etch structures may, at the option of the producer, be tested by Test Method
B or Test Method C.
3.5 The steel shall be tested in the final solution heat treated condition or such other conditions as are agreed upon between the
producer and the user.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
A923 − 23
TABLE 1 Applicability and Acceptance Criteria for
Test Method A
Acceptable Nonacceptable
Grade
Etch Structure Etch Structure
S82441, S31803, unaffected possibly affected
S32205, S32750, structure (Fig. 1, structure (Fig. 3, Fig. 4)
S32760, Fig. 2)
S32550,S32520,
J92205, J93404
affected structure (Fig. 5,
Fig. 6)
centerline structure (Fig.
7)
4. Apparatus
4.1 Source of Direct Current—Battery, generator, or rectifier capable of supplying approximately 15 V and 20 A.
4.2 Ammeter—Range from 0 to 30 A (see Note 1).
4.3 Variable Resistance (see Note 1).
4.4 Cathode—A cylindrical piece of conductive metal.
4.5 Large Electric Clamp, to hold the specimen to be etched.
4.6 Metallurgical Microscope, for examination of etched microstructures to 400 to 500 diameters.
4.7 Electrodes of the Etching Cell—The specimen to be etched is made the anode, and a cylindrical piece of metal as large as the
specimen to be etched is made the cathode.
4.8 Electrolyte, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), reagent grade.
NOTE 1—The variable resistance and ammeter are placed in the circuit to measure and control the current on the specimen to be etched.
5. Preparation of Test Specimens
5.1 For mill products, examination shall be made on a longitudinal or transverse section. For cast products, examination shall be
made on a separately cast test coupon which was heat treated in the same furnace load as the casting it represents. Unless otherwise
specified, selection of the test coupon size shall be at the discretion of the producer. Because high temperature or mechanical
deformation associated with particular cutting processes may alter the structure of the steel, the cutting of the test specimen should
be by a technique that prevents these effects. Alternatively, after the specimens are cut, any material that may have been affected
by high temperature or deformation associated with the cutting should be removed by machining or wet grinding prior to testing.
5.2 For mill products, the specimen should allow for a survey across the full thickness of the section or, in the case of a heavy
section, a survey from one surface through the mid-thickness of the section. The specimen shall include the mid-thickness.
5.3 For cast materials, the specimen shall be taken at approximately 1/4T.
5.4 Polishing—On all materials, cross-sectional surfaces should be polished to a metallographic finish suitable for examination at
400× after etching. Specimens containing welds should include base metal, weld heat–affected zone, and weld metal. The area to
be etched may be prepared by grinding to an 80- or 120-grit finish on a grinding belt or wheel without excessive heating and then
1 1 2 3
by polishing on successively finer emery papers, No. 1, ⁄2, ⁄0, ⁄0, ⁄0, and finer. Other methods of polishing may be acceptable.
5.5 Etching Solution—The solution for etching is prepared by adding 40 g of reagent grade sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to 100 g
of distilled water.
A923 − 23
5.6 Etching Conditions—The polished specimen should be etched at approximately 1 to 3 V dc, for 5 to 60 s (see Note 2).
NOTE 2—When etching is performed at 1 to 3 V dc with a platinum cathode for 5 to 60 s, any intermetallic phase is revealed by yellow, then brown,
staining, followed by staining of the ferrite.
5.7 Rinsing—Following etching, the specimen should be rinsed thoroughly in hot water and in acetone or alcohol, followed by
air drying.
6. Classification of Etch Structures
6.1 The etched surface shall be examined on a metallurgical microscope at 400 to 500×.
6.2 The etched cross-sectional areas should be examined thoroughly by complete traverse of the full sample and across all zones
such as weld metal, weld-affected zones, and base metal on specimens containing welds.
6.3 The etch structures are classified into the following types:
6.3.1 Unaffected Structure (Fig. 1, Fig. 2)—The ferrite has been etched without revelation of intermetallic phase. The interphase
FIG. 1 Unaffected Structure in S31803: (a) Longitudinal Section and (b) Transverse Section (500× Magnification Before Reproduction)
A923 − 23
FIG. 2 (a) J92205: Unaffected Structure-Statically Cast (400× Magnification)
FIG. 2 (b) J92205: Unaffected Structure-Centrifugally Cast (400× Magnification) (continued)
boundaries are smooth.
6.3.2 Possibly Affected Structure (Fig. 3, Fig. 4)—The ferrite has been etched with isolated indications of possible intermetallic
phase. The interphase boundaries may show a fine waviness.
6.3.3 Affected Structure (Fig. 5, Fig. 6)—The indications of an intermetallic phase are readily revealed before or simultaneously
with the staining of the ferrite during etching.
6.3.4 Centerline Structure (Fig. 7)—An intermetallic phase is observed as a continuous or semi-continuous phase in the
mid-thickness region of the product, with or without the affected structure outside of the mid-thickness region, indicative of
segregation.
7. Interpretation and Use of the Etch Structure Classifications
7.1 When Test Method A is used as a screening test, the use of these etch structures depends on the test method for which the
specimens are being screened. Important characteristics of each of the test methods are described as follows.
7.2 Test Method B—The Charpy impact test detects reductions in toughness from that of the optimal composition and processing.
Such reductions may be attributable to intermetallic phases or to other causes not necessarily detectable by Test Method A. A
A923 − 23
FIG. 3 Possibly Affected Structure in S31803: (a) Longitudinal Section and (b) Transverse Section (500× Magnification Before Repro-
duction)
FIG. 4 (a) J92205: Possibly Affected Structure-Statically Cast (400× Magnification)
A923 − 23
FIG. 4 (b) J92205: Possibly Affected Structure-Centrifugally Cast (400× Magnification) (continued)
FIG. 5 Affected Structure in 8a S31803: (a) Longitudinal Section and (b) Transverse Section (500× Magnification Before Reproduction)
Possibly Affected Structure is likely to be associated with a loss of Charpy impact toughness ranging from slight to severe. An
A923 − 23
FIG. 6 J92205: Affected Structure (400× Magnification)
FIG. 7 S31803: Longitudinal Section (500× Magnification Before Reproduction)
Affected Structure is associated with a severe loss of Charpy impact toughness. A Centerline Structure may or may not be detected
by a Charpy test, depending on the orientation of the Charpy specimen.
7.3 Test Method C—The ferric chloride corrosion test is a 24-h test in 10 % ferric chloride. It will detect a loss of corrosion
resistance associated with local depletion of chromium and molybdenum as a result of the precipitation of chromium-rich and
possibly molybdenum-rich phases, not limited to intermetallic phases. An Affected Structure is associated with significant weight
loss in the corrosion test. A Possibly Affected Structure is likely to be associated with significant weight loss in the corrosion test.
TEST METHOD B—CHARPY IMPACT TEST FOR
CLASSIFICATION OF STRUCTURES OF
DUPLEX STAINLESS STEELS
8. Scope
8.1 This test method describes the procedure for conducting the Charpy impact test as a method of detecting the precipitation of
detrimental intermetallic phases in duplex stainless steels. The presence or absence of an indication of intermetallic phase in this
test is not necessarily a measure of performance of the material in service with regard to any property other than that measured
A923 − 23
directly. The Charpy procedure as here applied is different from that as commonly applied for the determination of toughness and
should not be used when characterization of material toughness is the purpose of the testing.
8.2 The Charpy impact test may be used to evaluate mill and cast products, provided that it is possible to obtain a specimen of
relevant location and geometry.
8.3 Table 2 indicates the applicability and acceptance criteria for Test Method B.
9. Rapid Screening Test
9.1 Before testing by the Charpy impact test, specimens of the steel may be given a rapid screening test in accordance with the
procedures of Test Method A, Sodium Hydroxide Etch Test for Classification of Etch Structures of Duplex Stainless Steels.
Preparation, etching, and the classification of etch structures are described therein. Specimens having an etch structure described
as Unaffected Structure in Test Method A will be essentially free of detrimental effect on impact toughness related to the formation
of intermetallic phase. Other mechanisms for loss of toughness may occur independently but are beyond the scope of this test
method. Specimens showing Unaffected Structure in Test Method A are acceptable with respect to the absence of intermetallic
phases, without the necessity of performing the Charpy test as described in Test Method B. All specimens having other than
Unaffected Structure shall be tested by the Charpy impact test.
10. Apparatus
10.1 The test apparatus shall be as described in Test Methods and Definitions A370.
11. Preparation of Test Specimens
11.1 The test specimen shall be as described in Test Methods and Definitions A370.
11.2 An impact test for the purpose of detecting intermetallic phases shall consist of a single specimen taken from the product
piece or lot to be represented.
11.3 For mill products, the test specimen may be aligned in either the longitudinal or transverse direction (see Note 3). For
castings, the test specimen shall be parallel to the side of the test coupon; the notch may be either parallel to or perpendicular to
the coupon surface.
TABLE 2 Applicability and Acceptance Criteria for
Test Method B
Test Minimum Impact
Grade Condition
A
Temperature Energy
A
S82441 base metal –40 °F (–40 °C) 40 ft-lb (54 J)
A
S31803, base metal –40 °F (–40 °C) 40 ft-lb (54 J)
S32205,
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...