Road vehicles — Box task and detection response task to measure visual-manual and cognitive demand

This document defines key terms and parameters applied in the analysis of cognitive and visual-manual workload induced by transport information and control systems (TICS). It provides guidelines and minimum requirements on equipment and procedures for analysing cognitive and visual-manual load including assessment of TICS to: — plan evaluation trials; — specify (and install) data capture equipment; and — validate, analyse, interpret and report metrics indicating cognitive and visual-manual demand (standards of measurement). The described parameters and definitions provide a common source of reference for cognitive and visual-manual workload induced by TICS. It is applicable to standardized trials in laboratory-based settings. The procedures described in this document can also apply to more general assessments of cognitive and visual-manual workload while driving. Data collected and analysed according to this document will allow comparisons to be performed across different TICS applications.

Véhicules routiers — Mesure de la réponse à une demande visuelle-manuelle et cognitive

General Information

Status
Not Published
Technical Committee
Drafting Committee
Current Stage
5020 - FDIS ballot initiated: 2 months. Proof sent to secretariat
Start Date
25-Jun-2025
Completion Date
25-Jun-2025
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Draft
ISO/FDIS 8202 - Road vehicles — Box task and detection response task to measure visual-manual and cognitive demand Released:13. 06. 2025
English language
10 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Draft
REDLINE ISO/FDIS 8202 - Road vehicles — Box task and detection response task to measure visual-manual and cognitive demand Released:13. 06. 2025
English language
10 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


FINAL DRAFT
International
Standard
ISO/TC 22/SC 39
Road vehicles — Box task and
Secretariat: ANSI
detection response task to measure
Voting begins on:
visual-manual and cognitive
2025-06-25
demand
Voting terminates on:
2025-08-20
Véhicules routiers — Mesure de la réponse à une demande
visuelle-manuelle et cognitive
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT,
WITH THEIR COMMENTS, NOTIFICATION OF ANY
RELEVANT PATENT RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE
AND TO PROVIDE SUPPOR TING DOCUMENTATION.
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL, TECHNO­
LOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND USER PURPOSES, DRAFT
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE
TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR POTENTIAL
TO BECOME STAN DARDS TO WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE
MADE IN NATIONAL REGULATIONS.
Reference number
FINAL DRAFT
International
Standard
ISO/TC 22/SC 39
Road vehicles — Box task and
Secretariat: ANSI
detection response task to measure
Voting begins on:
visual-manual and cognitive demand
Véhicules routiers — Mesure de la réponse à une demande
Voting terminates on:
visuelle-manuelle et cognitive
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT,
WITH THEIR COMMENTS, NOTIFICATION OF ANY
RELEVANT PATENT RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE
AND TO PROVIDE SUPPOR TING DOCUMENTATION.
© ISO 2025
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL, TECHNO­
LOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND USER PURPOSES, DRAFT
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR POTENTIAL
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
TO BECOME STAN DARDS TO WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE
MADE IN NATIONAL REGULATIONS.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland Reference number
ii
Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Application of the box task (BT) and detection response task (DRT) . 4
5 Measurement setup . 4
5.1 Overview .4
5.2 Box task equipment .5
5.2.1 Display of visual driving scene .5
5.2.2 Steering wheel and gas pedal.5
5.2.3 Standard dynamics of driving scene .5
5.2.4 Experimental guidance on BT difficulty .6
5.2.5 Measurement recordings .6
5.3 DRT equipment .6
5.4 Documentation of setup .7
6 Procedure . 7
6.1 Overview .7
6.2 Participants .7
6.3 Instructions .7
6.4 Training procedure .8
6.5 Dual-task conditions . .8
6.6 Baseline runs .8
6.7 Calculation of performance metrics .8
6.7.1 Calculation of box task metrics .8
6.7.2 Calculation of DRT metrics .8
6.8 Analysing and interpreting differences between dual-task conditions .8
Annex A (informative) Determination of angles of steering wheel and gas pedal deflection
using their own sensors . 9
Bibliography .10

iii
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee
has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations,
governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely
with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the different types
of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
ISO draws attention to the possibility that the implementation of this document may involve the use of (a)
patent(s). ISO takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of any claimed patent
rights in respect thereof. As of the date of publication of this document, ISO had not received notice of (a)
patent(s) which may be required to implement this document. However, implementers are cautioned that
this may not represent the latest information, which may be obtained from the patent database available at
www.iso.org/patents. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity assessment,
as well as information about ISO's adherence to the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the
Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 22, Road vehicles, Subcommittee SC 39,
Ergonomics.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found atwww.iso.org/members.html.

iv
Introduction
In the last years, the use of advanced in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) and smartphones while driving
has increased significantly. These systems are increasingly based on multimodal interaction and place
different dimensions of secondary-task demand while driving, for example, visual-manual and cognitive
task demand. Consequently, there is a high risk that the use of IVIS while driving may impair driving
performance and increase the risk of accidents. To minimize road safety issues, it is essential to assess the
potential secondary-task demand of IVIS as early as possible in the development process.
There are several different methods to assess secondary-task demand while driving. The occlusion method,
[1]
for example, is a standardized tool to assess visual secondary-task demand ISO 16673 . The detection
response task (DRT), especially the tactile DRT, on the other hand, is a well-established method to estimate
cognitive-task demand. However, all methods can only measure specific dimensions of task demand.
Therefore, a new standardized method is recommended, one that reliably measures and differentiates
between various secondary-task demands.
The box task (BT) and DRT defined by this document can fill this gap. More precisely, the BT is intended to
measure visual-manual secondary-task demand. Additionally, in combination with a tactile DRT, cognitive
task demand can also be assessed. Hence, the BT + DRT represents an easy-to-use and cost-effective
laboratory method to differentiate between various dimensions and difficulty levels of secondary-task
demand while driving.
v
FINAL DRAFT International Standard ISO/FDIS 8202:2025(en)
Road vehicles — Box task and detection response task to
measure visual-manual and cognitive demand
1 Scope
This document describes a dynamic dual-task method that quantitatively measures human-performance
degradation on a primary driving-like task while a secondary task is being performed. The performance
measures of the method indicate the visual-manual and cognitive secondary-task demand associated with
visual-manual or auditory-verbal secondary task engagement while driving.
This document defines key terms and parameters for the assessment of BT + DRT. It provides guidelines and
minimum requirements on equipment and procedures to plan evaluation trials, specify (and install) data
capture equipment, conduct a study, analyse, interpret, and report metrics indicating visual-manual and
cognitive secondary-task demand using the BT + DRT.
The metrics and definitions described in this document provide a common source for the assessment of
visual-manual and cognitive task demand induced by different IVIS while driving. The BT + DRT is applicable
to standardized experiments in laboratory-based settings. Data collection and analyses according to this
document allow comparisons across different secondary tasks.
In contrast, this document does not apply to the measurement of primary (driving) task demand. This
document can be applied to both original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and after-market in-vehicle
systems, and to permanently installed as well as portable systems.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes
requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references,
the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 17488, Road vehicles — Transport information and control systems — Detection-response task (DRT) for
asses
...


ISO/DISFDIS 8202
ISO/TC 22/SC 39
Secretariat: ANSI
Date: 2024-09-032025-06-10
Road vehicles — Box task and detection response task to measure
visual-manual and cognitive demand
Véhicules routiers — Mesure de la réponse à une demande visuelle-manuelle et cognitive
DISFDIS stage
Warning for WD’s and CD’s
This document is not an ISO International Standard. It is distributed for review and comment. It is subject to change
without notice and may not be referred to as an International Standard.
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which
they are aware and to provide supporting documentation.

ISO/DISFDIS 8202:2025(en)
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication
may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,
or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO
at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: + 41 22 749 01 11
E-mail: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii
ISO/DISFDIS 8202:2025(en)
Contents
Foreword . iv
Introduction . v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Application of the box task (BT) and detection response task (DRT) . 4
5 Measurement setup. 5
5.1 Overview . 5
5.2 Box task equipment . 5
5.3 DRT equipment . 8
5.4 Documentation of setup . 8
6 Procedure . 8
6.1 Overview . 8
6.2 Participants . 9
6.3 Instructions . 9
6.4 Training procedure . 9
6.5 Dual-task conditions . 10
6.6 Baseline runs . 10
6.7 Calculation of performance metrics . 10
6.8 Analysing and interpreting differences between dual-task conditions . 10
Annex A (informative) Determination of angles of steering wheel and gas pedal deflection using
their own sensors . 11
Bibliography . 13

iii
ISO/DISFDIS 8202:2025(en)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the different types of
ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
ISO draws attention to the possibility that the implementation of this document may involve the use of (a)
patent(s). ISO takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of any claimed patent rights
in respect thereof. As of the date of publication of this document, ISO had not received notice of (a) patent(s)
which may be required to implement this document. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not
represent the latest information, which may be obtained from the patent database available at
www.iso.org/patents. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity assessment, as
well as information about ISO's adherence to the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical
Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 22, Road vehicles, Subcommittee SC 39,
Ergonomics.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found atwww.iso.org/members.html.
iv
ISO/DISFDIS 8202:2025(en)
Introduction
In the last years, the use of advanced in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) and smartphones while driving
has increased significantly. These systems are increasingly based on multimodal interaction and place
different dimensions of secondary-task demand while driving, for example, visual-manual and cognitive task
demand. Consequently, there is a high risk that the use of IVIS while driving may impair driving performance
and increase the risk of accidents. To minimize road safety issues, it is essential to assess the potential
secondary-task demand of IVIS as early as possible in the development process.
There are several different methods to assess secondary-task demand while driving. The occlusion method,
for example, is a standardized tool to assess visual secondary-task demand 0. The detection response task
(DRT), especially the tactile DRT, on the other hand, is a well-established method to estimate cognitive-task
demand. However, all methods can only measure specific dimensions of task demand. Therefore, a new
standardized method is recommended, one that reliably measures and differentiates between various
secondary-task demands.
The box task (BT) and DRT defined by this document can fill this gap. More precisely, the BT is intended to
measure visual-manual secondary-task demand. Additionally, in combination with a tactile DRT, cognitive
task demand can also be assessed. Hence, the BT + DRT represents an easy-to-use and cost-effective laboratory
method to differentiate between various dimensions and difficulty levels of secondary-task demand while
driving.
v
ISO/DISFDIS 8202:2025(en)
Road vehicles — Box task and detection response task to measure
visual-manual and cognitive demand
1 Scope
This document describes a dynamic dual-task method that quantitatively measures human-performance
degradation on a primary driving-like task while a secondary task is being performed. The performance
measures of the method indicate the visual-manual and cognitive secondary-task demand associated with
visual-manual or auditory-verbal secondary task engagement while driving.
This document defines key terms and parameters for the assessment andof BT + DRT. It provides guidelines
and minimum requirements on equipment and procedures to plan evaluation trials, specify (and install) data
capture equipment, conduct a study, analyse, interpret, and report metrics indicating visual-manual and
cognitive secondary-task demand using the BT + DRT.
The metrics and definitions described in this document provide a common source of reference for the
assessment of visual-manual and cognitive task demand induced by different IVIS while driving. The BT + DRT
is applicable to standardized experiments in laboratory-based settings. Data collection and analyses according
to this document allow comparisons across different secondary tasks.
In contrast, this document does not apply to the measurement of primary (driving) task demand. This
document can be applied to both original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and after-market in-vehicle
systems, and to permanently installed as well as portable systems.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes
requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references,
the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 17488, Road vehicles — Transport information and control systems — Detection-response task (DRT) for
assessing attentional effects of cognitive load in driving
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminologicalterminology databases for use in standardization at the following
addresses:
— IEC Electropedia: available at ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
3.1
baseline
test condition with the primary task (3.7)) only
[SOURCE: 0,, 2.2]
3.2
box task
BT
ISO/DISFDIS 8202:2025(en)
two-dimensional continuous tracking task (3.10)) simulating a car-following scenario where the driver has to
maintain the lane and the headway
Note 1 to entry: Within the box task , a dynamic box (3.13)) changes its lateral position (~ (lane maintenance) and size
(~ (headway to a lead vehicle) continuously.
Note 2 to entry: oneOne smaller and one larger static square is displayed in the middle of the screen as inner and outer
boundary (see 0 as an example).
Note 3 to entry: Participants have to adjust the box position and box size of the dynamic box by moving the steering wheel
and pressing the gas pedal and are instructed to keep the dynamic box within the boundaries.
Note 4 to entry: The box task () can be used in conjunction with the detection response task (3.4)) in order to assess visual-
manual and cognitive secondary-task demand (3.9.).
3.3
cognitive demand
demand for cognitive control imposed by a task (3.10))
[SOURCE: 0,, 3.6, modified — "cognitive load" was removed as a term.]
3.4
detection response task
DRT
task (3.10)) where participants respond to frequent artificial stimuli presented with a calibrated degree of
temporal uncertainty
Note 1 to entry: Detection performance, measured in terms of response time (3.21) and hit rate (3.20).).
Note 2 to entry: Detection performance is assumed to represent the degree to which attention is affected by the demand,
and in particular the cognitive demand (3.3load) component imposed by the secondary task (3.8)) under evaluation.
Note 3 to entry: The box task (3.2)) can be used in conjunction with the detection response task () in order to assess
visual-manual and cognitive secondary-task demand (3.9.).
3.5
dual task
two tasks (3.10)) concurrently performed, primarya primary task (3.7)) plus a secondary task (3.8))
[SOURCE: 0,, 2.6]
3.6
goal
system end state sought by the driver and which is meaningful in the context of a driver's use of an in-vehicle
system
[SOURCE: 0,, 2.8, modified — The example was deleted.]
3.7
primary task
driving or driving-like task (3.10)) used in the surrogate driving, driving simulator or on-road experimental
setup
Note 1 to entry: In the context of this current standarddocument, the box task (3.2)) (driving-like task used in the
surrogate driving) + DRT (3.4) is used as primary task.
ISO/DISFDIS 8202:2025(en)
[SOURCE: 0,, 3.18, modified — Note 1 to entry was added and "DRT experimental setups" has been replaced
by "experimental setup.]
3.8
secondary task
task (3.10)) that may be performed while driving but that is not concerned with the momentary real-time
control of the vehicle
[SOURCE: 0,, 3.
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.