CEN/TS 17241:2019
(Main)Intelligent transport systems - Traffic management systems - Status, fault and quality requirements
Intelligent transport systems - Traffic management systems - Status, fault and quality requirements
This document:
- illustrates quality and performance criteria, and approaches to their evaluation, for the operation of traffic management systems, including factors affecting the effective integration of field and centre systems and services, and
- specifies a data model for system status and faults of components of traffic management systems.
This document provides supporting information in a use case for the use of the quality and performance criteria, considering design, procurement, and performance management.
Intelligente Verkehrssysteme - Verkehrsmanagementsysteme - Status-, Fehler- und Qualitätsanforderungen
Dieses Dokument
— erläutert Qualitäts- und Leistungskriterien sowie Ansätze zu ihrer Bewertung für den Betrieb von Verkehrsmanagementsystemen einschließlich Faktoren mit Einfluss auf die effektive Integration von Feld- und zentralen Systemen und Diensten und
— legt ein Datenmodell für den Systemstatus und Fehler von Komponenten von Verkehrsmanagementsystemen fest.
Dieses Dokument enthält unterstützende Informationen in einem Anwendungsfall für die Nutzung der Qualitäts- und Leistungskriterien unter Berücksichtigung der Gestaltung, der Beschaffung und des Leistungsmanagements.
Systèmes de transport intelligents - systèmes de gestion du trafic - Exigences en matière d'état, de défauts et de qualité
Inteligentni transportni sistemi - Sistemi upravljanja prometa - Zahteve glede stanja, napak in kakovosti
Ta dokument:
– prikazuje merila kakovosti in zmogljivosti ter pristope njihovega vrednotenja za delovanje v sistemih upravljanja prometa, vključno z dejavniki, ki vplivajo na učinkovito integracijo terenskih in centralnih sistemov ter storitev, in
– določa podatkovne modele za stanje sistema in napake komponent sistemov upravljanja prometa.
Ta dokument podaja dodatne informacije v primeru uporabe za uporabo meril kakovosti in zmogljivosti ob upoštevanju načrtovanja, nabave in upravljanja zmogljivosti.
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-junij-2019
Inteligentni transportni sistemi - Sistemi upravljanja prometa - Zahteve glede
stanja, napak in kakovosti
Intelligent transport systems - Traffic management systems - Status, fault and quality
requirements
Intelligente Verkehrssysteme - Verkehrsmanagementsysteme - Status-, Fehler- und
Qualitätsanforderungen
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN/TS 17241:2019
ICS:
35.240.60 Uporabniške rešitve IT v IT applications in transport
prometu
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
CEN/TS 17241
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
SPÉCIFICATION TECHNIQUE
April 2019
TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION
ICS 35.240.60
English Version
Intelligent transport systems - Traffic management
systems - Status, fault and quality requirements
Intelligente Verkehrssysteme -
Verkehrsmanagementsysteme - Status-, Fehler- und
Qualitätsanforderungen
This Technical Specification (CEN/TS) was approved by CEN on 14 January 2019 for provisional application.
The period of validity of this CEN/TS is limited initially to three years. After two years the members of CEN will be requested to
submit their comments, particularly on the question whether the CEN/TS can be converted into a European Standard.
CEN members are required to announce the existence of this CEN/TS in the same way as for an EN and to make the CEN/TS
available promptly at national level in an appropriate form. It is permissible to keep conflicting national standards in force (in
parallel to the CEN/TS) until the final decision about the possible conversion of the CEN/TS into an EN is reached.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey and United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2019 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN/TS 17241:2019 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents Page
European foreword . 5
Introduction . 6
1 Scope . 8
2 Normative references . 8
3 Terms and definitions . 8
4 Symbols and abbreviations . 9
5 Quality and performance criteria . 10
5.1 Quality: fitness for purpose . 10
5.2 System quality . 11
5.2.1 Availability and uptime . 11
5.2.2 System compatibility and integration . 14
5.2.3 Configurability of systems . 14
5.2.4 Security . 15
5.2.5 Continuity of service and future proofing . 16
5.3 Device quality . 17
5.3.1 Physical robustness . 17
5.3.2 Failure modes . 17
5.3.3 Reliability and maintainability . 18
5.4 Functional quality . 19
5.4.1 Stated requirements and compliance . 19
5.4.2 Functional effectiveness . 19
5.4.3 Functional integration . 20
5.4.4 Usability . 21
5.5 Data quality . 21
5.5.1 Accuracy and related concepts . 21
5.5.2 Timeliness and granularity . 23
5.5.3 Spatio-temporal granularity . 23
5.5.4 System data . 24
5.6 Quality and performance management . 25
5.6.1 Lifecycle quality . 25
5.6.2 Quality evaluation . 27
5.6.3 Risk management . 28
6 System status and faults data model . 29
6.1 Overview . 29
6.2 General requirements . 29
6.3 Modelling principles . 30
6.3.1 Technical modelling principles . 30
6.3.2 Semantic modelling principles . 30
6.4 «D2Package» DevicePublication . 30
6.4.1 Overview . 30
6.4.2 Semantics . 31
6.5 «D2Package» StatusPublication . 32
6.5.1 Overview . 32
6.5.2 Semantics . 33
6.6 «D2Package» FaultPublication . 34
6.6.1 Overview . 34
6.6.2 Semantics . 36
6.7 «D2Package» Classes . 37
6.7.1 Overview . 37
6.7.2 Semantics . 39
6.8 «D2Package» DataTypes . 39
Annex A (normative) Status and fault data dictionary . 41
A.1 Disclaimer . 41
A.2 Overview . 41
A.3 Data dictionary of «D2Class» for “FaultAndStatus” . 42
A.3.1 “Classes” package . 42
A.3.1.1 Location of the “Classes” package . 42
A.3.1.2 “Classes” package classes . 43
A.3.1.3 “Classes” package association roles . 43
A.3.1.4 “Classes” package attributes . 44
A.3.2 “DevicePublication” package . 44
A.3.2.1 Location of “DevicePublication” package. 44
A.3.2.2 “DevicePublication” package classes . 45
A.3.2.3 “DevicePublication” package association roles . 45
A.3.2.4 “DevicePublication” package attributes . 46
A.3.3 “FaultPublication” package . 46
A.3.3.1 Location of “FaultPublication” package . 46
A.3.3.2 “FaultPublication” package classes . 47
A.3.3.3 “FaultPublication” package association roles . 47
A.3.3.4 “FaultPublication” package attributes . 48
A.3.4 “StatusPublication” package . 48
A.3.4.1 Location of the “StatusPublication” package . 48
A.3.4.2 “StatusPublication” package classes . 49
A.3.4.3 “StatusPublication” package association roles . 49
A.3.4.4 “StatusPublication” package attributes . 50
A.4 Data Dictionary of «D2Datatype» for “FaultAndStatus” . 50
A.4.1 General .
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.