CEN/TR 17143:2017
(Main)Intelligent transport systems - Standards and actions necessary to enable urban infrastructure coordination to support Urban-ITS
Intelligent transport systems - Standards and actions necessary to enable urban infrastructure coordination to support Urban-ITS
The scope of this project is to undertake a pre-study providing stakeholder mapping, framework identification, gap analysis and identification of standards and related actions required to address the urban infrastructure aspects: the provision of
a) multimodal information services;
b) traffic management;
c) urban logistics,
that are required to support the provision of Urban-ITS.
Specifically, the scope of this pre-study is to produce a technical report that will (by December 2015), for each area, specifically address the standardisation requirements to meet the following technical challenges:
- stakeholder engagement;
- common/interoperable data;
- multimodality;
- creation of (multimodal) transport datasets;
- multiple means of communication;
- urban logistics management
- creation of urban-interurban interfaces;
- use of open standards, architectures and specifications;
- enable rather than prescribe or proscribe.
It is the intention that, while the formal deliverable of this pre-study will be a technical report, that the project team will also identify areas for draft ‘New Work Item Proposals’ (and justifications) for work items to fill the identified gaps, where those gaps can be filled by Standards deliverables, and that the pre-study will also consider and make recommendations for any other support measures that are considered important or essential in order for the successful implementation, management and support of Urban-ITS in an environment where this is an administration controlled and led activity and not a community-wide managed or controlled activity.
The pre-study report, in addition to its submission to the European Commission, shall be in a format suitable for adaptation to a European standardisation deliverable on Use Cases addressing the three areas of this request and highlighting their possible interdependencies. Specifically, a gap analysis identifying additional requirements and priorities for:
d) Architecture: high level proposals outlining the parameters for a European standardisation deliverable for Urban-ITS architecture integrating the three areas of this request and highlighting connexions or interfaces with surrounding ITS applications as well as compatibility or coherence with existing standards, technical specifications, data models.
e) Multimodal Information Services: Standardisation deliverables in support of new mobility services, such as car sharing, car-pooling, public bike sharing services, park & ride, bike & ride, etc. Alternative fuel infrastructure, including information on location and availability of stations, charging models and capacity at stations, (integrated) payment schemes, etc. A European standardisation deliverable on reference data model, common data dictionary and metadata structure for multimodal information services.
f) Traffic Management: Standardisation deliverables in support of European standards for: a set of traffic management measures (encompassing the necessary infrastructure / static road data, dynamic road status data, traffic data or traffic control data, weather data), a set of traffic re-routing, traffic prioritisation and access regulation measures including intersections management (supplemented by vehicle identification data). In particular, the different types of road user charging models set up in various cities as well as the modalities of shared use of dedicated lanes by different types of vehicles (e.g. freight, public transport, emergency vehicles) should be considered. European standards or European Standardisation deliverables on reference data model, common data dictionary and metadata structure for traffic management including access regulation.
g) Urban Logistics (Including parking management): Standardisation deliverables in support of European standards for: Intelligent parking for light vehicles, commercial vehicles and trucks. (...)
Intelligente Verkehrssysteme - Notwendige Normen und Aktivitäten um die Koordination der urbanen Infrastruktur zur Unterstützung urbaner ITS zu ermöglichen
Systèmes de transport intelligents - Normes et actions nécessaires pour permettre la coordination des infrastructures urbaines en faveur des STI urbains
Inteligentni transportni sistemi - Standardi in potrebni ukrepi za usklajevanje urbane infrastrukture, ki podpira mestni ITS
To poročilo je sestavljeno z vidika prepoznavanja posebnosti standardizacije področij večmodalnih informacijskih sistemov, upravljanja prometa in mestne logistike, ki jih je treba urediti, da lahko mestne uprave lažje uvedejo mestne sisteme ITS.
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-februar-2018
Inteligentni transportni sistemi - Standardi in potrebni ukrepi za usklajevanje
urbane infrastrukture, ki podpira mestni ITS
Intelligent transport systems - Standards and actions necessary to enable urban
infrastructure coordination to support Urban-ITS
Intelligente Verkehrssysteme - Notwendige Normen und Aktivitäten um die Koordination
der urbanen Infrastruktur zur Unterstützung urbaner ITS zu ermöglichen
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN/TR 17143:2017
ICS:
35.240.60 Uporabniške rešitve IT v IT applications in transport
prometu
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
CEN/TR 17143
TECHNICAL REPORT
RAPPORT TECHNIQUE
October 2017
TECHNISCHER BERICHT
ICS 35.240.60
English Version
Intelligent transport systems - Standards and actions
necessary to enable urban infrastructure coordination to
support Urban-ITS
Systèmes de transport intelligents - Normes et actions Intelligente Verkehrssysteme - Notwendige Normen
nécessaires pour permettre la coordination des und Aktivitäten um die Koordination der urbanen
infrastructures urbaines en faveur des STI urbains Infrastruktur zur Unterstützung urbaner ITS zu
ermöglichen
This Technical Report was approved by CEN on 18 September 2017. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC
278.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey and United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
© 2017 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN/TR 17143:2017 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents Page
European foreword . 10
Introduction . 11
1 Scope . 13
2 Terms and definitions . 15
3 Symbols and abbreviations . 28
4 Summary of Remit to PT1701 . 33
5 Summary of situational factors affecting the study . 34
5.1 The Commission Implementing decision on ITS in urban areas . 34
5.2 Autonomous vehicles . 34
6 Summary of Standards framework . 36
7 Summary of Stakeholders and structuring . 37
7.1 Stakeholders . 37
7.2 Actors . 38
8 Summary of panoptic ‘across the board’ Requirements . 38
8.1 The panoptic context . 38
8.2 EU-ICIP . 38
8.3 Concept of Operations . 40
8.4 Common meta-data registry . 40
8.5 Vendor lock-in . 42
8.6 Testing and Conformance . 42
8.7 Standards procedures . 42
8.8 Other panoptic recommendations . 43
9 Summary of communications and security requirements . 43
9.1 Communications and Security context . 43
9.2 C-ITS Communications and Urban-ITS . 44
10 Summary of MIS requirements . 45
10.1 The MIS context . 45
10.2 MIS and Urban-ITS . 47
10.3 Approach taken . 48
11 Summary of Traffic Management (TM) requirements . 48
11.1 The TM context . 48
11.2 TM and Urban-ITS . 49
11.3 Traffic management Standards issues. . 50
11.4 Exchange of data and information with third parties . 50
11.5 Procurement and maintenance of the Urban-ITS solution for TM . 50
12 Summary of Urban Logistics (UL) requirements . 51
12.1 UL context . 51
12.2 Urban Freight . 52
12.3 Standardised data formats and standardised transaction profiles . 52
12.4 Emissions monitoring and geofencing . 52
12.5 Recommendations for Urban Logistics . 53
13 Summary of architecture requirements. 53
13.1 FRAME Architecture context. 53
13.2 Coherence . 53
13.3 Standards required in order to ensure homogeneity and support for Urban-
ITS . 53
13.4 Update and extension of the FRAME ITS architecture . 54
(informative) Detailed Recommendations of CEN/TC 278/PT 1701 . 55
A.1 Background and Structure of this Annex . 55
A.1.1 Background . 55
A.1.2 Use Cases . 55
A.1.3 Objectives for Phase 2 outreach . 57
A.2 Key issues and summarised recommendations . 59
A.2.1 Summarised recommendations . 59
A.2.2 Phase 2 outreach . 60
A.3 Revised High Level Priority Recommendations for CID Support . 64
A.4 Revised Recommendations for other ESOs/Committees . 68
A.5 Revised priority Recommendations for other support measures . 70
A.6 Other supported Recommendations for CID support . 72
A.7 Other Recommendations for CID support (unsupported by outreach
feedback) . 72
A.8 Recommendations withdrawn as a result of outreach feedback . 73
(informative) Objectives, strategy, philosophy and process of the study . 76
B.1 Foreword . 76
B.2 Overview . 76
B.3 Commission Implementing Decision . 76
B.3.1 Overview . 76
B.3.2 General requirements for the requested deliverables . 78
B.3.3 Requirements to strengthen compatibility and coherence with existing
standards and technical specifications . 78
B.3.4 Specific requirements for the requested deliverables . 79
B.3.5 Multimodal information systems . 79
B.3.6 Traffic management, including access regulation . 80
B.3.7 Urban logistics, including parking management . 80
B.4 Remit to PT1701 . 81
(informative) Situational Factors affecting the study . 83
C.1 Overview . 83
C.2 Characterising Urban-ITS . 87
C.3 Stakeholders and actors . 92
C.3.1 Stakeholders . 92
C.3.2 Actors . 94
C.4 Mixed vendor environment . 96
C.4.1 Introduction. 96
C.4.2 Obligations and expectations of urban public bodies . 98
C.5 Standards combinations . 101
C.6 Cooperation . 103
C.7 Barriers and constraints to the operation of the open single European market
(OSEM) . 103
C.7.1 Common issues . 103
C.7.2 Political obstacles to OSEM . 105
C.7.3 Commercial obstacles to OSEM . 105
C.7.4 Technical obstacles to OSEM . 106
C.7.5 Contending aspirations of Urban administrations and commercial freight
operators . 107
C.7.6 Vendor lock-in . 107
C.8 Autonomous /automated vehicles . 109
C.8.1 Context . 109
C.8.2 Autonomous driving and mobility. 109
C.8.3 Autonomous driving and connectivity . 109
C.8.4 Autonomous driving and maps . 110
C.8.5 Autonomous vehicles and safety issues . 112
C.8.6 Autonomous vehicles and security . 113
C.8.7 Take up of autonomous vehicles . 113
C.8.8 Autonomous vehicles and associated standardizations . 114
C.9 Issues associated with the introduction of Urban-ITS . 118
(informative) Standards Framework . 119
D.1 Extant Standards . 119
D.2 Legacy systems and Standards. 120
D.2.1 Context . 120
D.2.2 Legacy system and standards benefits. 121
D.2.3 Legacy Standards for general use . 121
D.2.4 Legacy system and standards issues . 147
D.2.5 Vendor lock-in . 151
D.2.6 Transition and migration issues . 151
D.2.7 Availability of data concepts . 153
D.3 C-ITS as a tool to overcome silos . 154
D.4 Organisation and interdependencies . 157
(informative) Stakeholders and structuring . 160
E.1 Key stakeholders . 160
E.2 E.2 High level mapping for key identified stakeholders . 160
E.3 Overall framework required for interoperability and interchangeability . 161
E.3.1 Interoperability . 161
E.3.2 Interchangeability . 161
E.3.3 Intermodality . 161
E.3.4 Multimodality . 162
E.3.5 Sustainability . 162
E.4 Systems and devices that could take advantage of common structuring and
implementation guidelines . 168
E.4.1 Benefits of a common reference data model/ Meta-data registry . 168
E.4.2 Benefits of data exchange profiles . 169
E.4.3 Location determination and location referencing. 170
E.4.4 Open urban data access portal. 179
E.4.5 Structure of Public Transport Service related data . 181
E.5 High level generic ‘Concept of Operations’ for city/administration support for
Urban-ITS . 187
E.5.1 General . 187
E.5.2 Statement of the goals and objectives of the Urban-ITS . 187
E.5.3 Strategies, tactics, policies, and constraints affecting the Urban-ITS . 188
E.5.4 Organisations, activities, and interactions among participants and
stakeholders for Urban-ITS. 191
E.5.5 Clear statement of responsibilities and authorities delegated for Urban-ITS . 192
E.5.6 Equipment required for Urban-ITS . 192
E.5.7 Operational processes for the Urban-ITS . 193
E.5.8 Role of the jurisdiction in Urban-ITS . 195
E.5.9 Role of the Urban-ITS prime service provider . 196
E.5.10 Role of the Urban-ITS application service provider . 197
E.5.11 Role of the Urban-ITS user . 197
E.5.12 EGeneric characteristics for all instantiations of the Urban-ITS application
service domain . 198
E.6 Standards requirements . 198
E.7 Identifying standardisation gaps . 198
E.8 The process of consensus . 199
(informative) Panoptic (Multi-category) requirements . 201
F.1 Panoptic (Multi-category) requirements — Objectives, summary and scope
addressed . 201
F.1.1 Objectives . 201
F.1.2 Summary . 201
F.1.3 Scope . 201
F.1.4 Stakeholder engagement . 201
F.1.5 Common/Interoperable data . 201
F.1.6 Multimodality . 202
F.1.7 Creation of (multimodal) transport datasets . 202
F.1.8 Multiple means of communication . 202
F.1.9 Creation of urban-interurban interfaces . 203
F.1.10 Use of open standards, architectures and specifications . 204
F.1.11 Enable rather than prescribe or proscribe . 204
F.1.12 Obtaining consistency across the European Community, and across wider
domains . 204
F.1.13 Objectives of EU-ICIP . 207
F.1.14 Organization of an EU-ICIP Guide . 209
F.2 Panoptic (Multi-category) requirements — Relevant business/service areas
and applications identified with key stakeholders . 210
F.3 Panoptic (Multi-category) requirements — Gap and overlap analysis
involving European and international SDOs and their relevant deliverables . 210
F.3.1 Panoptic (Multi-category) requirements — Standards to achieve objectives . 210
F.4 Panoptic (Multi-category) requirements — Potential revision of existing
standards, new standards development and international harmonisation
tasks based on gap/overlap results . 214
F.5 Panoptic (Multi-category) requirements — Roadmap with targeted
deliverables and concrete actions to speed up deployment of Urban-ITS . 214
F.6 Funding issues . 214
(informative) Multimodal Information Services (MIS). 215
G.1 MIS Objectives, summary and scope addressed . 215
G.1.1 General . 215
G.1.2 Stakeholder engagement . 217
G.1.3 Common/Interoperable data . 217
G.1.4 Multimodality . 218
G.1.5 Flexible Transport Services . 220
G.1.6 Creation of (multimodal) transport datasets . 220
G.1.7 Multiple means of communication . 221
G.1.8 Creation of urban-interurban interfaces . 221
G.1.9 Use of open standards, architectures and specifications . 222
G.1.10 Enable rather than prescribe or proscribe . 225
G.2 MIS Relevant business/service areas and applications identified with key
stakeholders . 225
G.2.1 MIS Business service area . 225
G.2.2 MIS Applications (Use Cases) information layers and data types . 226
G.2.3 MIS Use Cases context . 226
G.2.4 MIS Use Cases . 228
G.3 MIS Gap and overlap analysis involving European and international SDOs and
their relevant deliverables . 254
G.3.1 MIS-0001 Gaps- MIS planned data retrieval . 254
G.3.2 MIS-0002 Gaps - MIS real-time data capture . 255
G.3.3 MIS-0003 Gaps - MIS planned data processing . 255
G.3.4 MIS-0004 - Gaps - MIS real-time data processing . 256
G.3.5 MIS-0005 Gaps - MIS actual trip plan provision . 256
G.3.6 MIS-0006 Gaps - MIS information structuring . 258
G.3.7 MIS-0007 Gaps - MIS information dissemination. 258
G.3.8 MIS-0008 Gaps - MIS query structuring . 258
G.3.9 MIS-0000 Gaps - user support . 258
G.4 MIS Potential revision of existing standards, new standards development and
international harmonisation tasks based on gap/overlap results . 258
G.4.1 MIS planned data retrieval UC-MIS- 0001 . 258
G.4.2 MIS real-time data capture UC-MIS- 0002 . 259
G.4.3 MIS operational raw data provision UC- MIS-0002-1 . 259
G.4.4 MIS planned data processing UC-MIS-0003. 259
G.4.5 MIS scheduled trip plan provision UC-MIS-0003-1 . 260
G.4.6 MIS planned data updating UC-MIS-0003-2 . 260
G.4.7 MIS real-time data processing UC-MIS-0004 . 260
G.4.8 MIS real-time data updating UC-MIS-0004-1 . 261
G.4.9 MIS Actual Trip Plan Provision UC-MIS-0005 . 261
G.4.10 MIS Dynamic Car-pooling UC- MIS-0005-1 . 261
G.4.11 MIS Driver Guidance UC-MIS-0005-2 . 261
G.4.12 MIS Information Structuring UC-MIS-0006 . 262
G.4.13 MIS Information Dissemination UC-MIS-0007 . 262
G.4.14 MIS Query Structuring UC-MIS-0008 . 262
G.4.15 to topology-related concepts i.e. ‘origin/destination’, a specific location (e.g.
stop point), line, etc.; . 262
G.4.16 User Support . 263
G.5 MIS Roadmap with targeted deliverables and concrete actions to speed up
deployment of Urban-ITS . 263
G.6 Funding issues . 263
(informative) Traffic Management (TM) . 264
H.1 TM Objectives, summary and scope addressed . 264
H.1.1 Traffic management: principles and historical evolvement . 264
H.1.2 Spheres of activities and problem scenarios . 265
H.1.3 Solution strategies and processes . 267
H.2 TM Relevant business/service areas and applications identified with key
stakeholders . 267
H.2.1 Impact facilities of Traffic Management . 267
H.2.2 TM infrastructure as a toolbox . 268
H.2.3 Use Cases as a tool to describe the business in the TM-domain . 271
H.2.4 TM process model as a reference model for TM Use Cases . 272
H.2.5 TM Use Cases . 274
H.3 TM Gap and overlap analysis involving European and international SDOs and
their relevant deliverables . 287
H.3.1 Problems in the TM domain related to the lack of standards . 287
H.3.2 Interoperability requirements in the TM-domain . 288
H.3.3 Use Case based gap and overlap analysis . 290
H.4 TM Potential revision of existing standards, new standards development and
international harmonisation tasks based on gap/overlap results . 291
H.4.1 Preliminary observation . 291
H.4.2 TM Architecture recommendations . 292
H.4.3 H.4.3 Traffic management domain specific recommendations . 292
H.5 TM Roadmap with targeted deliverables and concrete actions to speed up
deployment of Urban-ITS . 293
H.6 TM Funding issues . 293
(informative) Urban Logistics (UL) . 294
I.1.1 General . 294
I.1.2 Stakeholder engagement . 294
I.1.3 Common/Interoperable data . 295
I.1.4 Multimodality . 295
I.1.5 Creation of (multimodal) transport datasets . 295
I.1.6 Multiple means of communication . 295
I.1.7 Creation of urban-interurban interfaces . 295
I.1.8 Use of open standards, architectures and specifications . 296
I.1.9 Enable rather than prescribe or proscribe . 296
I.2 UL Relevant business/service areas and applications identified with key
stakeholders . 296
I.2.1 Urban freight consolidation centres . 296
I.2.2 UL Business service area . 310
I.2.3 UL Applications (Use Cases) . 311
I.3 UL Existing CEN/TC 278 working groups involved and co/cross working
arrangements . 379
I.4 UL International/European harmonisation requirements . 380
I.5 UL Gap and overlap analysis involving European and international SDOs and
their relevant deliverables . 380
I.5.1 UL--0110v1 Provision of relevant traffic information- congestion; green
wave; etc. data . 380
I.5.2 Delivery vehicle realtime mapping/route optimisation . 380
I.5.3 Vehicle access management and monitoring . 381
I.5.4 Vehicle Speed Monitoring . 381
I.5.5 Urban Consolidation Centres (UCC) . 381
I.5.6 Oversize Management . 381
I.5.7 Emissions monitoring . 382
I.5.8 Low Emission Zones- Data Formats . 382
I.5.9 Cross Border Enforcement . 382
I.5.10 Charging alternatively fuelled vehicles on streets . 382
I.6 UL Potential revision of existing standards, . 382
I.6.1 Weigh in motion . 382
I.6.2 Vehicle parking facilities . 382
I.7 UL Roadmap with targeted deliverables and concrete actions to speed up
deployment of Urban-ITS . 383
I.8 UL Funding issues . 384
(informative) Communications and Security (CS) issues for Urban-ITS . 385
J.1 Communications objectives, summary and scope addressed . 385
J.1.1 Stakeholder engagement . 385
J.1.2 Cooperative-ITS and Urban-ITS . 385
J.1.3 Common/Interoperable data . 387
J.1.4 Multimodality .
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...