EN 9722:2023

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-december-2023
Aeronavtika - Arhitektura za integrirano upravljanje stanja sistema
Aerospace series - Architecture for integrated management of a system's health
condition
Luft- und Raumfahrt - Zentralisierte Architektur für das Zustandssystemmanagement
Série aérospatiale - Architecture pour la gestion intégrée de l’état de santé d’un système
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 9722:2023
ICS:
49.020 Letala in vesoljska vozila na Aircraft and space vehicles in
splošno general
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EN 9722
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
October 2023
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 49.020
English Version
Aerospace series - Architecture for integrated
management of a system's health condition
Série aérospatiale - Architecture pour la gestion Luft- und Raumfahrt - Architektur für das integrierte
intégrée de l'état de santé d'un système Management eines Systemzustandes
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 4 September 2023.

CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2023 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN 9722:2023 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 4
Introduction . 5
1 Scope . 6
2 Normative references . 6
3 Terms, definitions and acronyms . 6
3.1 Terms and definitions . 6
3.2 Acronyms . 7
4 Information on which this document is based . 9
4.1 Overview of maintenance . 9
4.1.1 Content of the health card . 9
4.1.2 Health card value chain . 10
4.1.3 Use of the health card . 10
4.2 Overview of maintenance . 14
4.2.1 General. 14
4.2.2 Structuring of maintenance in terms of level of impact . 15
4.2.3 Health card and example of coordination between stakeholders . 15
4.2.4 Health card and predictive maintenance . 15
4.3 Overview of services engineering . 17
4.3.1 Link between system engineering and services engineering . 17
4.3.2 Enterprise architecture applied to the support architecture . 17
4.3.3 Enterprise architecture modelling . 18
4.3.4 Presentation of contact/visibility/control lines . 19
4.3.5 Link between product and services . 19
4.3.6 Fundamental constraints and requirements . 23
5 Recommendations on architectures (ecosystem and product) . 24
5.1 General. 24
5.2 Functional architecture centred on the health card . 25
5.3 Example of support organization . 26
5.3.1 General. 26
5.3.2 Stakeholders and roles . 26
5.3.3 Breakdown of support into areas and roles . 26
5.4 Evolution of the organic value enhancement architecture. 37
6 Using the health card . 38
6.1 OODA Loop applied to the health condition of a system. 38
6.1.1 General. 38
6.1.2 Observe . 38
6.1.3 Capitalize . 40
6.1.4 Detect . 40
6.1.5 Diagnose . 41
6.1.6 Predict . 41
6.1.7 Decide . 41
6.1.8 Act/react . 42
6.1.9 Visualize . 42
6.2 Capacity projection/reliability of projections. 43
6.2.1 General . 43
6.2.2 Operational configuration of a system. 43
6.2.3 Framework of design studies for operational applications for predictive
maintenance (AOMP) . 43
7 Recommendations regarding data . 45
7.1 General . 45
7.2 Cybersecurity . 45
7.3 Data centralization and digital continuity . 45
7.4 Obligations of manufacturers with regard to data . 51
8 Conclusion/outlook . 51
Annex A (informative) Enterprise architecture view of an organization example outside the
supply chain . 53
Annex B (informative) Added value and responsibilities of support stakeholders . 54
Annex C (informative) Illustration of the product and services engineering approach . 55
Annex D (normative) Overview of the OODA loop: application to a diagnostic and prognostic
system . 56
Annex E (informative) Decontextualization: an example of degradation and reliability models . 58
E.1 General . 58
E.2 Fundamental hypotheses . 58
E.3 Framework for a solution to assess the level of degradation and reliability . 58
E.4 Decontextualization . 60
E.5 The uses of these models . 61
E.6 Processes in which these models will be used . 62
E.7 Value enhancement architecture . 62
Annex F (informative) Use case/operational scenarios based on the phases . 63
F.1 For maintenance, preparation of missions . 63
F.2 For the pilot, on a mission . 64
F.3 For the manufacturer, the designers . 64
Bibliography . 67

European foreword
This document (EN 9722:2023) has been prepared by the Aerospace and Defence Industries
Association of Europe — Standardization (ASD-STAN).
After enquiries and votes carried out in accordance with the rules of this Association, this
document has received the approval of the National Associations and the Official Services of the
member countries of ASD-STAN, prior to its presentation to CEN.
This document shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical
text or by endorsement, at the latest by April 2024, and conflicting national standards shall be
withdrawn at the latest by April 2024.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject
of patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the
following countries are bound to implement this document: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia,
Cyprus, Czech Republic,
...