EN 15269-20:2009

2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und Rauchdichte von Türen, Toren und Verblendverschlüssen - Teil 20: Rauchdichte von Drehtüren aus Holz und Stahl sowie VerblendverschlüssenApplication élargie des résultats d'essai en matière d'étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes et des blocs-fermetures - Partie 20: Blocs-portes pivotants ou battants en bois et en acierExtended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 20: Smoke control for hinged and pivoted steel, timber and metal framed glazed doorsets91.060.50Vrata in oknaDoors and windows13.220.50Požarna odpornost gradbenih materialov in elementovFire-resistance of building materials and elementsICS:Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z:EN 15269-20:2009SIST EN 15269-20:2009en,de01-december-2009SIST EN 15269-20:2009SLOVENSKI
STANDARD
EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM
EN 15269-20
September 2009 ICS 13.220.50; 91.060.50 English Version
Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 20: Smoke control for hinged and pivoted steel, timber and metalframed glazed doorsets
Application étendue des résultats d'essais en matière de résistance au feu et/ou d'étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtre, y compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie intégrés - Partie 20 : Étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes battants et pivotants en acier, en bois et vitrés à ossature métallique
Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 20: Rauchdichtigkeit von Drehflügeltüren und -toren aus Holz und Stahl sowie Metall-und Holzrahmentüren mit Verglasungen This European Standard was approved by CEN on 1 August 2009.
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN Management Centre or to any CEN member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
Management Centre:
Avenue Marnix 17,
B-1000 Brussels © 2009 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. EN 15269-20:2009: ESIST EN 15269-20:2009

 Part 5: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted, metal framed, glazed doorsets and openable windows  Part 6: Fire resistance of sliding timber doorsets  Part 7: Fire resistance of sliding steel doorsets  Part 8: Fire resistance of horizontally folding timber doorsets  Part 9: Fire resistance of horizontally folding steel doorsets  Part 10: Fire resistance of steel rolling shutters  Part 11: Fire resistance of operable fabric curtains  Part 20: Smoke control for hinged and pivoted steel, timber and metal framed glazed doorsets This document has been prepared under a mandate given to CEN by the European Commission and the European Free Trade Association. According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. SIST EN 15269-20:2009

The "C" classification is complimented by the digits 0 to 5 according to the use category on the basis of details included in the relevant product standards. The effect on the "C" classification following an extended application process is not addressed in this standard. SIST EN 15269-20:2009

The document prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-3. NOTE
It is anticipated that the above scope will be extended to cover other product types when the relevant test information and expertise become available. Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests, the extended application may cover Ambient Temperature Smoke Control (Sa) and Medium Temperature Smoke Control (Sm) classifications and all or some of the following variations:  glazed elements, louvres and/or vents;  side, transom or overpanels;  items of building hardware;  decorative finishes;  intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;  alternative supporting construction(s). 2 Normative references The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. EN 1363-1:1999, Fire resistance tests – Part 1: General requirements EN 1634-1:2008, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies and elements of building hardware – Part 1: Fire resistance tests for doors, shutters and openable windows EN 1634-2, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies and elements of building hardware – Part 2: Fire resistance characterisation test for elements of building hardware
EN 1634-3:2004, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies, openable windows and elements of building hardware – Part 3: Smoke control test for door and shutter assemblies
EN 13501-2:2007, Fire classification of construction products and building elements – Part 2: Classification using data from fire resistance tests, excluding ventilation services prEN 15269-1:2009, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware – Part 1: General Requirements EN ISO 13943:2000, Fire safety – Vocabulary (ISO 13943:2000) SIST EN 15269-20:2009

prEN 15269-1:2009 together with the following apply : 3.1 core material fitted centrally within the thickness of a door leaf which may consist of a single sheet of material or a combination either of sheets of the same material or layers of different materials 4 Determination of the field of extended application
4.1 General 4.1.1 Before there can be any consideration for extended application the doorset shall have been tested and classified in accordance with EN 1634-3 and EN 13501-2 respectively in order to establish a classification for the doorset. 4.1.2 A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics may be improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining the classifications obtainable from testing to EN 1634-3, including those lower than the test duration. However, this shall never lead to an increased classification for any specific parameter beyond that achieved during any one test unless specifically identified in the relevant Construction Parameter Variation tables. 4.1.3 All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining the classification obtained from testing to EN 1634-3. 4.1.4 If, by following the ensuing procedure, any part of the classification cannot be achieved by extended application rules that part of classification shall be omitted from the subsequent extended application report and classification report. 4.2 Procedure for evaluation 4.2.1 Identify the variations from the original test specimen(s) which are required to be covered by an extended application report. 4.2.2 Locate the variations in the appropriate parameter variation by reference to columns (1) and (2) of Table A.1. 4.2.3 Review the type of classification to be retained from column (3) of Table A.1 and establish from the contents of column (4) of Table A.1 whether any extended application is available without the need for further testing. 4.2.4 Where this is deemed to be possible this can be recorded in the extended application report together with any appropriate restrictions and the stated rules from column (4) in Table A.1. 4.2.5 Where the variations required can only be achieved from additional testing according to column (5), the additional test can be made on a similar specimen type to the original test against which the extended application is sought. Alternatively, column (5) in Table A.1 identifies an option for alternative testing and relevant test parameters. 4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application 4.3.1 It is possible to provide a limited field of extended application from the results of a single test. However, where a manufacturer intends to produce a range of doors incorporating single doors and also double doors with or without glazing, with alternative elements of building hardware, etc., it is recommended SIST EN 15269-20:2009

4.4.2 Where a series of tests have been conducted, the field of extended application shall be based on the lowest performance achieved from the complete series of tests unless excessive leakage has been attributed to one or more specific construction parameter variation. 4.4.3 Where it has been possible, to identify leakage due to a specific parameter, the extended application for all other construction parameter variations can be based on the performance achieved after isolating the parameter with excessive leakage. 5 Extended application report Prepare an extended application report in accordance with the requirements of Clause 6 of prEN 15269-1:2009, based on the results of evaluations in accordance with the above. 6 Classification report The classification report shall be determined from the results of the extended application report and shall be presented in accordance with Annex A of EN 13501-2:2007. SIST EN 15269-20:2009

Construction parameter variations Table A.1 is designed to provide rules for the creation of extended application reports by experts in the field of smoke control testing of hinged and pivoted doorsets. Table A.1 shall only be used to evaluate a field of extended application when at least one positive smoke control test to EN 1634-3 has resulted in a classification according to EN 13501-2.
The first two columns of Table A.1 identify possible variations to the construction details of the specimen tested.
The type of classification, referred to as performance characteristic in Column (3) of Table A.1, achieved from the test can be identified from the ‘Performance characteristic’ section of Table A.1 column (3) as Ambient Smoke Control (Sa) and Medium Temperature Smoke Control (Sm) as derived from EN 13501-2.
The effect of the change in each parameter is evaluated for each characteristic in Table A.1 column (3) under Sa for Ambient temperature and Sm for Medium temperature. Where symbols are used these relate to the following definitions: a) < - forecast is a worse performance; b) > - forecast is a better performance; c) = - forecast is no significant difference; d) ≤ - forecast is a worse or equal performance; e) ≥ - forecast is a better or equal performance; f) >=< - forecast unknown. These evaluations lead to the judgement of the possibility of extending the field of application, the results of which are given in column (4) of Table A.1.
Where additional tests are deemed to be necessary the type of specimen approved for incorporation of the changed parameter is defined in column (5) of Table A.1. Where it is possible to use information from tests performed on one configuration for evidence on a different configuration, this allowance has been made in order to reduce the overall number of tests required for extended application evaluation (e.g. single action doorsets to double action doorsets). In all cases following the evaluation, the relationship between the leaf and the frame (e.g. gaps) shall remain the same as shall the relationship between smoke seals and the faces and/or edges of the leaf (i.e. the contact between the edges of the smoke seal and the leaf face) shall not decrease, nor shall the contact between the smoke seal and the leaf edge. Solid timber can be replaced by other solid timber of the same or higher density. Glued timber with solid pieces of min. 10 mm thickness may be used as solid timber. Composite wood products (e.g. Medium Density Fibreboard) may not be replaced with other materials or composites. If after consideration of a specific variation, additional changes are required to be made to the specimen, these may be made providing the implications on other variations are also taken into account. SIST EN 15269-20:2009

Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
A Door leaf In certain cases, the rules given in Section A are also appropriate to side and overpanels or the door frame; where this is the case it is clearly indicated in column (1). For double leaf doorsets, both leaves shall be of the same basic construction. A.1 General
A.1.1 number of leaves Single leaf from double leaf doorset
≥ ≤ Possible for Sa if the seals are unchanged
Not possible for Sm without additional test Test shall be a single leaf doorset from the most onerous exposure direction. A.1.2 number of leaves Double leaf from single leaf doorset
≤ ≤ Not possible without additional test Test shall be a double leaf doorset. A.1.3 smoke seals (fitted at leaf to frame interface) – see Figure A.1 Location towards the frame rebate ≤ ≤ Not possible without additional test Test shall be of the required configuration. A.1.4 smoke seals (fitted at leaf to frame interface) – see Figure A.2 Location away from the frame rebate ≤ ≤ Not possible without additional test Test shall be of the required configuration. A.1.5 smoke seals (fitted in meeting edges) Location change ≤ ≤ Not possible without additional test Test shall be of the required configuration. A.1.6 smoke seals (fitted in leaf or frame) Remove < < Not possible without additional test Test shall be of the required configuration. A.1.7 Louvres in door leaf or panel
Add < < Not possible without additional test Additional test to include louvre fitted in the required position. Test can be single leaf or double leaf. A.1.8 Louvres in door leaf or panel Remove ≥ ≥ Possible
Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
A.1.9 Louvres in door leaf or panel tested with louvre Fitting higher or lower
in the leaf = = Possible
A.1.10 Louvres in door leaf or panel tested with louvre Fitting to the side of the tested position = = Possible
A.1.11 Louvres in door leaf or panel tested with louvre – see Figure A.3 smaller size (total area) ≥ ≥ Possible
A.1.12 Louvres in door leaf or panel tested with louvre larger size (for area or dimensions) < < Not possible without additional test Further test required with maximum louvre required. Test can be single or double leaf. A.1.13 Louvre tested in double leaf doorset Change position of louvre from one leaf to the opposite leaf >=< >=< Possible providing that both door leaves are active or the louvre is tested in active leaves only
A.1.14 Leaf edge rebate (to door leaf or panel – not at the meeting edges; see section A.2 for meeting edge parameters)
- see Figure A.4 Add (added rebate shown shaded in drawings) ≥ ≥ Possible providing the rebate does not lead to reduced compression on the seals
A.1.15 Leaf edge rebate (to door leaf or panel – not at the meeting edges; see section A.2 for meeting edge parameters) Remove ≤ ≤ Not possible without additional test The required detail shall be tested. Test can be single or double leaf. A.1.16 Change in mode of operation (single/double action) Alternative >=< ≤ Possible for Sa to provide a double action doorset from a single action doorset providing the sealing system, including the area around the hinges/pivots, is unchanged, otherwise not possible Test to be on the required mode of operation A.1.17 Latched condition for single leaf or double leaf doorsets - see
Change in latching condition >=< <
Possible in line with the following relationship otherwise not possible without an additional test:Additional test to include the required SIST EN 15269-20:2009

Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
Figure A.5
tested without a latch/lock/bolt tested with a latch/lock/bolt
but unlatched tested with a latch/lock/bolt, latched latching condition extension to: without a lock/latch/bolt
possible not possible extension to: with lock/latch/bolt but unlatched not possible
not possible extension to: with a lock/latch/bolt, latched not possible possible
Additional latch/lock may be fitted providing there is specific evidence on the latch/lock identifying it will not affect the leakage. A.2
Meeting edge detail
A.2.1 Meeting edge detail – see Figure A.6 Change in edge detail ≤ ≤ Possible for Sa for rebated details shown in Figures A.6(a and A.6(b only otherwise not possible without additional test Test shall be double leaf. A.2.2 Astragal – see Figure A.6f) Add ≥ ≥ Possible
A.2.3 Astragal – see Figure A.6f) Remove ≤ ≤ Not possible without additional test Test shall be double leaf. A.3 Size variations
A.3.1 Size
of leaf or panel (area, width, height) Decrease ≥ ≥ Possible
Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
A.3.2 Height/width/area of leaf or panel
Increase >=< >=< The doorset shall normally be tested at full size, however, where this is not possible an increase in dimension is possible providing the sealing system is unchanged and any interruptions for hardware are in equal or less proportion to the tested specimen and subject to the following rules: For Sm doorsets with a maximum tested leakage rate of 50% (single leaf doorsets with 10 m³/h and for double leaf doorsets with 15 m³/h) of the leakage rate referred in EN 13501-2, for: a) Hinged or pivoted latched doors: Size increase is permitted up to 15 % height, 15 % width and 20 % area, b) Hinged or pivoted unlatched doors: Size increase is permitted up to 15 % height, 15 % width and 20 % area, providing the closing device is of an appropriate power size for the leaf size, c) Horizontally and vertically sliding doors: Size increase is permitted up to 50 % height, 50 % width and 50 % area, d) Steel single skin folding shutters (uninsulated): Size increase is permitted up to 50 % height, 50 % width and 50 % area,
For configuration/sizes above that allowed by the adjacent column, the specific size shall be tested. SIST EN 15269-20:2009

Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
e) Sliding/folding (insulated): Size increase is permitted up to 15 % height, f) Rolling shutters: Size increase is permitted up to 30 % height and 10 % width. For Sa doorsets the dimensions can be increased 4 times those allowed for points a) to f) above. Otherwise not possible without additional test.
A.3.3 Thickness of the door leaf or panel Increase ≥ ≥ Possible
A.3.4 Thickness of the door leaf or panel Decrease ≤ ≤ Not possible without an additional test Required thickness of leaf or panel shall be tested. A.4 Materials and constructions
A.4.1 Density of core material of leaf or panel Increase/decrease ≥ >=< Possible for timber and steel based Sa doorsets and possible for Sm timber and steel based doorsets providing the increase/decrease is not greater than 50% otherwise not possible without an additional test
Test on required density of core material
A.4.2 Pattern of core material of leaf or Increase number of pieces = >=< Possible for Sa.
Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
panel –see Figure A.7 Possible for Sm doorsets by 50% providing the test included more than one joint.Possible also proportionately with a leaf/panel size increase For double leaf doorsets, the rule shall be applied to each leaf separately, otherwise not possible without additional test. Test shall be on a leaf with the maximum number of required pieces.
A.4.3 Pattern of core material of leaf or panel
Decrease number of pieces= >=< Possible for Sa,
Possible for Sm steel based doorsets providing the fixing technique is unchanged and possible for Sm timber based dorsets by up to 50% providing one joint in the core material remains. For double leaf
doorsets, the rule shall be applied to each leaf separately, otherwise not possible without additional test. Test shall be on a leaf with the minimum number of required pieces. A.4.4 Number of layers of identical core material of leaf or panel
Increase number of layers = >=< Possible for Sa.
Possible for Sm doorsets up to 50% providing the test included more than one joint. For double leaf doorsets, the rule shall be applied to each leaf separately, otherwise not possible without additional test. Test shall be on a leaf with the maximum number of required layers.
A.4.5 Number of layers of identical core material of leaf or panel
Decrease number of layers = >=< Possible for Sa,
Possible for Sm steel based doorsets providing the fixing technique is unchanged and possible for Sm timber based dorsets by up to 50% providing one joint in the core material remains. For double leaf
doorsets, the rule shall be applied to each leaf separately, otherwise not possible without additional test. Test shall be on a leaf with the minimum number of required pieces
A.4.6 Type of core material in leaf or panel (single thickness or in combination of different layers) Change of manufacturer (same basic product type) = = Possible
A.4.7 Type of core material in leaf or panel (single thickness or in combination of different layers) Alternative composition of same basic product type = = Possible
Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
A.4.8 Facings (for timber doorsets) Alternative type = >=< Possible for Sa based on direct application.
Possible for Sm to interchange wood based facings based on the direct application for Sa doorsets and providing the alternative is of the same or higher density and the same or greater thickness (subject to A.4.9) and that the assembly technique is not changed, otherwise not possible without additional test Additional test using the specific type of material A.4.9 Facings (for timber doorsets) Increase in thickness ≥ ≥ Possible
A.4.10 Facings (for timber doorsets) Decrease in thickness ≤ ≤ Not possible without an additional test Required thickness of facing shall be tested. A.4.11 Type of adhesives used in leaf or panel Change of supplier/manufacturer for identical composition = = Possible
A.4.12 Type of adhesives used in leaf or panel Alternative composition = ≤ Possible for Sa
Not possible for Sm Additional test to include the alternative adhesive A.4.13 Glued area (partially or fully glued) Increase
≥ ≥ Possible
A.4.14 Glued area
(partially or fully glued) Decrease
≤ ≤ Not possible
A.4.15 Metal protective sheet (internally mounted) used in leaf or panel Add = >=< Possible for Sa
Possible for Sm timber based doorsets providing the sheet
is not more than 1mm thick and for Sm steel based doorsets providing the sheet is not more than 2mm thick Further
test to include the required sheets A.4.16 Metal protective sheet (internally mounted) used in leaf or panel Remove = ≤ Possible for S a
Not possible for Sm Additional test to include a door leaf with no sheet SIST EN 15269-20:2009

Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
A.4.17 Cross-section dimension of perimeter framing elements in leaf or panel Increase ≥ ≥ Possible
A.4.18 Cross-section dimension of perimeter framing elements in leaf or panel Decrease >=< >=< Possible for Sa. Possible for Sm providing the stiffness of the leaf is not reduced such that the resulting leaf will not distort more than the original leaf at the equivalent of 50Pa load otherwise not possible without additional test.Additional test to include the minimum dimension of framing element A.4.19 Framing elements of leaf or panel
Change of species
≥ >=< Possible to change species for other solid timber of the same or higher density timber only otherwise not possible without additional test
A.4.20 Framing elements of leaf or panel
Change of material >=< >=< Not possible Additional test to include the required material A.4.21 Jointing technique of internal leaf or panel framing
Alternative
>=< >=< Possible for Sa. Possible for Sm providing the stiffness of the leaf is not reduced such that the resulting leaf will not distort more than the original leaf at the equivalent of 50Pa load otherwise not possible without additional test.The required jointing method & detail shall be tested. A.4.22 Threshold at the bottom of the door set – See Figure A.8 Add ≥ >=< Possible for Sa.
Possible for Sm providing the tested bottom sealing system is maintained or replaced by the sealing system tested at the upper edges of the door leaf otherwise not possible without additional testing. The required threshold detail shall be tested. A.4.23 Threshold at the bottom of the doorset Remove = ≤ Possible for Sa
Not possible for Sm The required threshold detail shall be tested. A.4.24 Decorative leaf or panel edge detail – see Figure A.9 Shape >=< >=< Possible providing the alternative shape doesn’t interfere with the sealing system otherwise not possible without additional testing The required edge detail shall be tested. SIST EN 15269-20:2009

Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
A.4.25 Dimension of smoke seals (fitted in leaf or frame) Increase >=< >=< Possible up to a maximum of 25% in any cross sectional dimension providing the same material and the same manufacturer otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include maximum size of seals A.4.26 Dimension of smoke seals (fitted in leaf or frame) Decrease > > Not possible Test to include minimum size of
seals A.4.27 Type of smoke seals (fitted in leaf or frame) Change of supplier/manufacturer >=< >=< Possible if the composition, material, size and shape is identical otherwise not possible without an additional testFurther test to include the required seal supplier/manufacturer’s seal A.4.28 Type of smoke seals (fitted in leaf or frame) Alternative material >=< >=< Not possible Further test to include the required seal supplier/manufacturer’s seal
A.5 Decorative and / or protective finishes
A.5.1
Decorative laminates/timber veneers on the face of the leaf, panel or frame Add = >=< Possible for Sa
Possible for Sm for laminates and veneers up to 1.5mm thick otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required decorative laminate A.5.2
Decorative laminates/timber veneers on the face of the leaf, panel or frame Remove >=< >=< Possible for Sa for laminates and timber veneers up to 1.5mm thick and possible for Sm for timber veneers up to 1.5mm thick otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required decorative laminate/veneer A.5.3
Decorative laminates/timber veneers/plastics edging on the edges (on leaf, panel or frame) Add >=< >=< Possible providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test
Additional test to include the required decorative laminate/veneer SIST EN 15269-20:2009

Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
A.5.4
Decorative laminates/timber veneers/plastics edging on the edges (on leaf, panel or frame)
Remove >=< >=< Possible providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required edge detail A.5.5
Types of decorative laminates and timber veneers on the face of the leaf, panel or frame Change material = >=< Possible for Sa
Possible for Sm for laminates and veneers up to 1.5mm thick otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required decorative laminate A.5.6
Decorative laminates and timber veneers on the edges (on leaf, panel or frame) Change material/species ≥ ≥ Possible providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required change to sealing system A.5.7
Species of timber lippings on leaf or panel
Change of species = = Possible providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required change to sealing system A.5.8
Lippings on leaf or panel Change size >=< >=< Possible providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required change to sealing system A.5.9
Lippings on leaf or panel Add >=< >=< Possible providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required change to sealing system A.5.10 Lippings on leaf or panel Remove >=< >=< Possible providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required change to sealing system A.5.11 Protective plates – face fixed (kick plates / push plates / protective plates) on leaf or panel Recessed to unrecessed >=< >=< Possible providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required change to sealing system SIST EN 15269-20:2009

Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
A.5.12 Protective metal plates – face fixed (kick plates / push plates / protective plates) on leaf or panel Unrecessed to recessed >=< >=< Possible for plates up to 1.5mm thick providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required change to sealing system A.5.13 Protective plates – including kick plates / push plates / protective plates / protective composites and plastic elements, face fixed on leaf or panel – see Figure A.10
Add
≥ >=< Possible for Sa Possible for Sm providing no thicker than 1.5mm or, if thicker than 1.5mm, limited to one piece up to 800 mm from the base of the leaf or limited to maximum two pieces per face at 250 mm in width or height and providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test. Additional test to include the required change to sealing system and/or the plate configuration A.5.14 Protective plates – including kick plates / push plates / protective plates / protective composites and plastic elements, face fixed on leaf or panel Remove >=< >=< Possible providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required change to sealing system A.5.15 Protective plates – including kick plates / push plates / protective plates / protective composites and plastic elements, face fixed on leaf or panel Change material >=< >=< Possible for Sa providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test Also possible for Sm providing the melting point is higher than 200ºC and providing the sealing system is unaffected otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include the required change to sealing system and the alternative material
A.5.16 Attachment technique of protective plates (as described above) on leaf or panel Alternative (adhesive / screw) = = Possible
A.5.17 Mouldings (on the face of the leaf or panel) Add = = Possible
A.5.18 Mouldings (on the face of the leaf or panel) Remove = = Possible
Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
A.6 Joinery Type (framed) doorsets
NOTE This section refers to non-flush doorsets which are made using a perimeter, and where applicable internal, framing, made of solid or laminated timber based materials, and which include one or more panels. The panels/apertures are normally formed using the perimeter and internal framing sections. This section covers specific rules for these types of doorsets only. Where the required parameter is not addressed in this Section, the Section above for flush doorsets should be used. For variations on glazed panels, refer to Section E. A.6.1 Cross-section dimension of perimeter / intermediate framing elements in leaf or panel Increase ≥ ≥ Possible
A.6.2 Intermediate framing in leaf or panel Remove ≥ ≥ Possible
A.6.3 Intermediate framing in leaf or panel Add ≤ ≤ Not possible
A.6.4 Panel size Increase ≤ ≤ Not possible
A.6.5 Panel size Decrease ≥ ≥ Possible
A.6.6 Panel construction Alternative >=< >=< Not possible
B. Door Frame
B.1. General
B1.1 Position of an access door above floor level Alternative
= = Possible
B1.2 Position of door frame within the thickness of the supporting construction Alternative
>=< >=< Possible providing the door frame does not project beyond the face of the supporting construction more than tested otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional evidence to include door frame at required position B.2 Materials and constructions
B.2.1 External Dimensions
Increase
>=< >=< Possible providing the rebate depth is maintained otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test to include door frame with required rebate B.2.2 External Dimensions
Decrease
>=< ≤ Possible for Sa providing the rebate depth is maintained otherwise not possible without an additional test Not possible for Sm without an additional test Additional evidence to include door frame at required dimensions SIST EN 15269-20:2009

Additional Evidence Required
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Sa Sm
B.2.3 Type of
frame material (timber) Change timber type ≥ ≥ Possible
B.2.4 Type of
frame material (steel) Mild to stainless
≥ ≥ Possible
B.2.5 Type of
frame material (steel) Stainless to mild ≥ ≥ Possible
B.2.6 Type of
frame material Interchange material (timber and steel) >=< >=< Possible for timber doors Sa and Sm to change from steel frame to timber frame or frame made of timber based materials otherwise not possible Additional test shall provide evidence of each configuration e.g. double leaf, double acting etc, with each type of frame material. B.2.7 Thickness of steel Increase ≥ ≥ Possible
B.2.8 Thickness of steel Decrease ≥ >=< Possible for Sa
Not possible for Sm without an additional test Additional evidence to include door frame at minimum thickness B.2.9 Type of infill material (in steel frame) Alternative material = >=< Possible for Sa where seal to supporting construction is unchanged otherwise not possible without an additional test
Additional evidence to include door frame with required density material Not possible for Sm without an additional test where less dense material is required B.2.10 Jointing technique for timber based frame members Alternative
≤ ≤ For timber based frames, it is possible to change from nails to screw fixings, or from butt
...