ASTM E569/E569M-20
(Practice)Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During Controlled Stimulation
Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During Controlled Stimulation
ABSTRACT
This practice provides guidelines for acoustic emission (AE) examination or monitoring of structures, such as pressure vessels, piping systems, or other structures that can be stressed by mechanical or thermal means. The basic functions of an AE monitoring system are to detect, locate, and classify emission sources. Other methods of nondestructive testing (NDT) may be used to further evaluate the significance of acoustic emission sources. Acoustic emission examination of a structure usually requires application of a mechanical or thermal stimulus. Such stimulation produces changes in the stresses in the structure. During stimulation of a structure, AE from discontinuities (such as cracks and inclusions) and from other areas of stress concentration, or from other acoustic sources (such as leaks, loose parts, and structural motion) can be detected by an instrumentation system, using sensors which, when stimulated by stress waves, generate electrical signals. Annual calibration and verification of pressure transducer, AE sensors, preamplifiers, signal processor, and AE electronic waveform generator should be performed.
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Controlled stimulation, that is, the application of mechanical or thermal load, can generate AE from flawed areas of the structure. Sources may include flaw growth, oxide fracture, crack face stiction and release on load application, and crack face rubbing.
5.2 The load range above normal service (peak) load is used to propagate fatigue cracks in the plastically strained region ahead of the crack tip. Crack propagation may not be a reliable source of AE, depending on the alloy and microstructure, the amount (rate) of crack extension, and possibility of brittle fracture in a segment of crack extension.
5.3 Load increases resulting in significant ductile tearing may produce less emission than expected for the amount of crack growth. Processes that result in more brittle cleavage fractures are more detectable and produce more emission for smaller amounts of flaw growth. These include corrosion fatigue and stress corrosion cracking modes of flaw growth, and would also be more likely in cast or welded structures than in fabricated (forged, rolled, or extruded) structures. Distributed defect structures such as hydrogen embrittlement, or creep cavitation in high temperature steels, may also produce significant emission without evidence of an existing crack-like flaw.
5.4 Application and relaxation of load can produce secondary mechanically-induced emission that is not related to flaw extension. This includes crack face stiction release on loading—usually evidenced by emission at the same rising load value regardless of peak load; or crack face rubbing on load release as the fracture surfaces come back together.
5.5 The load rate can be a significant concern as instrumentation can become saturated with AE activity. The ability to differentiate real data from background noise can be compromised.
5.6 Background noise must be fully investigated and minimized before any AE monitoring can begin.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice provides guidelines for acoustic emission (AE) monitoring of structures, such as pressure vessels, piping systems, or other structures that can be stressed by mechanical or thermal means.
1.2 The basic functions of an AE monitoring system are to detect, locate, and classify emission sources. Other methods of nondestructive testing (NDT) may be used to further evaluate the significance of reported acoustic emission sources.
1.3 Units—The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall be used independently of the other, and values from the two systems shall not be combined.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if an...
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 14-Jan-2020
- Technical Committee
- E07 - Nondestructive Testing
- Drafting Committee
- E07.04 - Acoustic Emission Method
Relations
- Effective Date
- 15-Jan-2020
- Effective Date
- 01-Feb-2024
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2019
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2019
- Effective Date
- 01-Jan-2018
- Effective Date
- 15-Jun-2017
- Effective Date
- 01-Feb-2017
- Effective Date
- 01-Aug-2016
- Effective Date
- 01-Feb-2016
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2015
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2015
- Effective Date
- 01-Sep-2015
- Effective Date
- 01-Jun-2014
- Effective Date
- 01-Jun-2014
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2013
Overview
ASTM E569/E569M-20 is the internationally recognized standard practice for acoustic emission (AE) monitoring of structures during controlled stimulation, such as mechanical or thermal loading. Developed by ASTM, this standard provides fundamental procedures and requirements for implementing AE monitoring as a non-destructive testing (NDT) method, particularly for structures like pressure vessels, piping systems, and other mechanically or thermally stressed constructs.
The document outlines how AE systems detect, locate, and classify emission sources in materials-enabling early identification of flaws, cracks, leaks, or other stress-induced discontinuities. Additional NDT methods (e.g., ultrasonics, dye penetrants) may be recommended to further assess any indications found during AE monitoring.
Key Topics
Acoustic Emission System Functions
- Detecting, locating, and classifying AE sources through sensor arrays.
- Differentiating emission sources from background noise.
Controlled Stimulation
- Structures are loaded mechanically or thermally to induce stress and stimulate emission from flaws or stress concentrations.
- Types of emissions include crack growth, oxide fracture, corrosion fatigue, leaks, and structural motion.
Calibration and Verification
- Annual calibration and verification required for AE sensors, preamplifiers, signal processors, and waveform generators.
- Performance verifications use simulated AE sources to verify system sensitivity and localization capability.
Data Interpretation and Reporting
- AE event analysis includes source location, activity, and intensity.
- All results summarized with location maps or tables for clear assessment.
- Permanent data records enable future reanalysis and tracking.
Preparation and Safety
- Proper sensor selection, placement, and system checks are essential.
- Identifying and minimizing background noise prior to monitoring.
- Safety considerations for testing near ductile-brittle transition temperatures of materials.
Personnel and Agency Qualification
- Requirement for qualified NDT personnel in accordance with established standards (e.g., ANSI/ASNT CP-189, SNT-TC-1A).
Applications
ASTM E569/E569M-20 is widely utilized in industries that rely on the integrity of pressurized or structural systems, including:
- Petrochemical and power generation
- Regular in-service inspection of pressure vessels and high-pressure piping.
- Aerospace and transportation
- Monitoring critical welded or cast components for early signs of fatigue or stress corrosion cracking.
- Manufacturing and infrastructure
- Evaluation of tanks, boilers, and structural supports for signs of hydrogen embrittlement or creep cavitation.
- Research and development
- Study of material responses to stress and failure mechanisms under controlled conditions.
Implementing AE monitoring as described in this standard helps organizations detect defects during operation or maintenance, supporting predictive maintenance, safety assurance, and cost-effective asset management.
Related Standards
For comprehensive acoustic emission monitoring and non-destructive testing (NDT) programs, ASTM E569/E569M-20 is often referenced alongside the following standards:
- ASTM E543 - Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive Testing
- ASTM E650 - Guide for Mounting Piezoelectric Acoustic Emission Sensors
- ASTM E976 - Guide for Determining the Reproducibility of Acoustic Emission Sensor Response
- ASTM E1316 - Terminology for Nondestructive Examinations
- ASTM E2374 - Guide for Acoustic Emission System Performance Verification
- ANSI/ASNT CP-189 - Standard for Qualification and Certification of Nondestructive Testing Personnel
- SNT-TC-1A - Recommended Practice for Nondestructive Testing Personnel Qualification and Certification
- NAS-410 - Certification and Qualification of Nondestructive Testing Personnel
Integrating these related documents enhances the consistency, safety, and reliability of AE monitoring across industries.
Keywords: acoustic emission, AE monitoring, nondestructive testing, pressure vessel inspection, structural health monitoring, ASTM E569, sensor calibration, flaw detection, mechanical stress, thermal loading.
Buy Documents
ASTM E569/E569M-20 - Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During Controlled Stimulation
REDLINE ASTM E569/E569M-20 - Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During Controlled Stimulation
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

ICC Evaluation Service
Building products evaluation and certification.

QAI Laboratories
Building and construction product testing and certification.

Aboma Certification B.V.
Specialized in construction, metal, and transport sectors.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM E569/E569M-20 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During Controlled Stimulation". This standard covers: ABSTRACT This practice provides guidelines for acoustic emission (AE) examination or monitoring of structures, such as pressure vessels, piping systems, or other structures that can be stressed by mechanical or thermal means. The basic functions of an AE monitoring system are to detect, locate, and classify emission sources. Other methods of nondestructive testing (NDT) may be used to further evaluate the significance of acoustic emission sources. Acoustic emission examination of a structure usually requires application of a mechanical or thermal stimulus. Such stimulation produces changes in the stresses in the structure. During stimulation of a structure, AE from discontinuities (such as cracks and inclusions) and from other areas of stress concentration, or from other acoustic sources (such as leaks, loose parts, and structural motion) can be detected by an instrumentation system, using sensors which, when stimulated by stress waves, generate electrical signals. Annual calibration and verification of pressure transducer, AE sensors, preamplifiers, signal processor, and AE electronic waveform generator should be performed. SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Controlled stimulation, that is, the application of mechanical or thermal load, can generate AE from flawed areas of the structure. Sources may include flaw growth, oxide fracture, crack face stiction and release on load application, and crack face rubbing. 5.2 The load range above normal service (peak) load is used to propagate fatigue cracks in the plastically strained region ahead of the crack tip. Crack propagation may not be a reliable source of AE, depending on the alloy and microstructure, the amount (rate) of crack extension, and possibility of brittle fracture in a segment of crack extension. 5.3 Load increases resulting in significant ductile tearing may produce less emission than expected for the amount of crack growth. Processes that result in more brittle cleavage fractures are more detectable and produce more emission for smaller amounts of flaw growth. These include corrosion fatigue and stress corrosion cracking modes of flaw growth, and would also be more likely in cast or welded structures than in fabricated (forged, rolled, or extruded) structures. Distributed defect structures such as hydrogen embrittlement, or creep cavitation in high temperature steels, may also produce significant emission without evidence of an existing crack-like flaw. 5.4 Application and relaxation of load can produce secondary mechanically-induced emission that is not related to flaw extension. This includes crack face stiction release on loading—usually evidenced by emission at the same rising load value regardless of peak load; or crack face rubbing on load release as the fracture surfaces come back together. 5.5 The load rate can be a significant concern as instrumentation can become saturated with AE activity. The ability to differentiate real data from background noise can be compromised. 5.6 Background noise must be fully investigated and minimized before any AE monitoring can begin. SCOPE 1.1 This practice provides guidelines for acoustic emission (AE) monitoring of structures, such as pressure vessels, piping systems, or other structures that can be stressed by mechanical or thermal means. 1.2 The basic functions of an AE monitoring system are to detect, locate, and classify emission sources. Other methods of nondestructive testing (NDT) may be used to further evaluate the significance of reported acoustic emission sources. 1.3 Units—The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall be used independently of the other, and values from the two systems shall not be combined. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if an...
ABSTRACT This practice provides guidelines for acoustic emission (AE) examination or monitoring of structures, such as pressure vessels, piping systems, or other structures that can be stressed by mechanical or thermal means. The basic functions of an AE monitoring system are to detect, locate, and classify emission sources. Other methods of nondestructive testing (NDT) may be used to further evaluate the significance of acoustic emission sources. Acoustic emission examination of a structure usually requires application of a mechanical or thermal stimulus. Such stimulation produces changes in the stresses in the structure. During stimulation of a structure, AE from discontinuities (such as cracks and inclusions) and from other areas of stress concentration, or from other acoustic sources (such as leaks, loose parts, and structural motion) can be detected by an instrumentation system, using sensors which, when stimulated by stress waves, generate electrical signals. Annual calibration and verification of pressure transducer, AE sensors, preamplifiers, signal processor, and AE electronic waveform generator should be performed. SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Controlled stimulation, that is, the application of mechanical or thermal load, can generate AE from flawed areas of the structure. Sources may include flaw growth, oxide fracture, crack face stiction and release on load application, and crack face rubbing. 5.2 The load range above normal service (peak) load is used to propagate fatigue cracks in the plastically strained region ahead of the crack tip. Crack propagation may not be a reliable source of AE, depending on the alloy and microstructure, the amount (rate) of crack extension, and possibility of brittle fracture in a segment of crack extension. 5.3 Load increases resulting in significant ductile tearing may produce less emission than expected for the amount of crack growth. Processes that result in more brittle cleavage fractures are more detectable and produce more emission for smaller amounts of flaw growth. These include corrosion fatigue and stress corrosion cracking modes of flaw growth, and would also be more likely in cast or welded structures than in fabricated (forged, rolled, or extruded) structures. Distributed defect structures such as hydrogen embrittlement, or creep cavitation in high temperature steels, may also produce significant emission without evidence of an existing crack-like flaw. 5.4 Application and relaxation of load can produce secondary mechanically-induced emission that is not related to flaw extension. This includes crack face stiction release on loading—usually evidenced by emission at the same rising load value regardless of peak load; or crack face rubbing on load release as the fracture surfaces come back together. 5.5 The load rate can be a significant concern as instrumentation can become saturated with AE activity. The ability to differentiate real data from background noise can be compromised. 5.6 Background noise must be fully investigated and minimized before any AE monitoring can begin. SCOPE 1.1 This practice provides guidelines for acoustic emission (AE) monitoring of structures, such as pressure vessels, piping systems, or other structures that can be stressed by mechanical or thermal means. 1.2 The basic functions of an AE monitoring system are to detect, locate, and classify emission sources. Other methods of nondestructive testing (NDT) may be used to further evaluate the significance of reported acoustic emission sources. 1.3 Units—The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall be used independently of the other, and values from the two systems shall not be combined. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if an...
ASTM E569/E569M-20 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 91.120.20 - Acoustics in building. Sound insulation. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM E569/E569M-20 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM E569/E569M-13, ASTM E1316-24, ASTM E1316-19b, ASTM E1316-19, ASTM E1316-18, ASTM E1316-17a, ASTM E1316-17, ASTM E1316-16a, ASTM E1316-16, ASTM E2374-15, ASTM E1316-15a, ASTM E1316-15, ASTM E1316-14, ASTM E1316-14e1, ASTM E1316-13d. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM E569/E569M-20 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: E569/E569M − 20
Standard Practice for
Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During
Controlled Stimulation
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E569/E569M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year
of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.
A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope* E650 Guide for Mounting Piezoelectric Acoustic Emission
Sensors
1.1 This practice provides guidelines for acoustic emission
E976 GuideforDeterminingtheReproducibilityofAcoustic
(AE) monitoring of structures, such as pressure vessels, piping
Emission Sensor Response
systems, or other structures that can be stressed by mechanical
E1316 Terminology for Nondestructive Examinations
or thermal means.
E2374 Guide for Acoustic Emission System Performance
1.2 The basic functions of an AE monitoring system are to
Verification
detect, locate, and classify emission sources. Other methods of
2.2 Other Documents:
nondestructive testing (NDT) may be used to further evaluate
SNT-TC-1A Recommended Practice for Nondestructive
the significance of reported acoustic emission sources.
Testing Personnel Qualification and Certification
1.3 Units—The values stated in either SI units or inch-
ANSI/ASNT CP-189 Standard for Qualification and Certifi-
pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The
cation of Nondestructive Testing Personnel
values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equiva- 4
2.3 AIA Standard:
lents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each
NAS-410 Certification and Qualification of Nondestructive
system shall be used independently of the other, and values
Testing Personnel
from the two systems shall not be combined.
3. Terminology
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
3.1 Definitions—Definitions of terms relating to acoustic
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
emission may be found in Section B of Terminology E1316.
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
3.2.1 active source, n—onewhichexhibitsincreasingcumu-
1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-
lative AE activity with increasing or constant stimulus.
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
3.2.2 AE activity, n—the presence of acoustic emission
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
during an examination.
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
3.2.3 AE source intensity, n—average energy, counts, or
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
amplitude per hit.
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
3.2.4 critically active source, n—one which exhibits an
2. Referenced Documents
increasing rate of change of cumulative AE activity with
increasing or constant stimulus.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E543 Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive 3.2.5 critically intense source, n—one in which the AE
Testing source intensity consistently increases with increasing stimulus
or with time under constant stimulus.
3.2.6 intense source, n—one in which the AE source inten-
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E07 on Nonde- sity of an active source consistently exceeds, by a specified
structive Testing and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E07.04 on
amount, the average AE source intensity of active sources.
Acoustic Emission Method.
Current edition approved Jan. 15, 2020. Published February 2020. Originally
approved in 1976. Last previous edition approved in 2013 as E569/E569M – 13.
DOI: 10.1520/E0569_E0569M-20. AvailablefromAmericanSocietyforNondestructiveTesting(ASNT),P.O.Box
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or 28518, 1711 Arlingate Ln., Columbus, OH 43228-0518, http://www.asnt.org.
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Available fromAerospace IndustriesAssociation ofAmerica, Inc. (AIA), 1000
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on WilsonBlvd.,Suite1700,Arlington,VA22209-3928,http://www.aia-aerospace.org.
the ASTM website.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E569/E569M − 20
4. Summary of Practice 6.2 Personnel Qualification
6.2.1 If specified in the contractual agreement, personnel
4.1 Acoustic emission examination of a structure usually
performing examinations to this standard shall be qualified in
requires application of a mechanical or thermal stimulus. Such
accordance with a nationally and internationally recognized
stimulation produces changes in the stresses in the structure.
During stimulation of a structure, AE from discontinuities NDT personnel qualification practice or standard such as
(such as cracks and inclusions) and from other areas of stress ANSI/ASNT CP-189, SNT-TC-1A, NAS-410, or a similar
concentration, or from other acoustic sources (such as leaks,
document and certified by the employer or certifying agency,
loose parts, and structural motion) can be detected by an as applicable. The practice or standard used and its applicable
instrumentation system, using sensors which, when stimulated
revision shall be identified in the contractual agreement be-
by stress waves, generate electrical signals.
tween the using parties.
4.2 In addition to immediate evaluation of the emissions
6.3 Qualification of Nondestructive Testing Agencies—If
detected during the application of the stimulus, a permanent
specified in the contractual agreement, NDT agencies shall be
record of the number and location of emitting sources and the
qualifiedandevaluatedasdescribedinSpecificationE543.The
relative amount of AE detected from each source provides a
applicable edition of Specification E543 shall be specified in
basis for comparison with sources detected during the exami-
the contractual agreement.
nation and during subsequent stimulation.
6.4 Timing of Examination—The timing of the examination
5. Significance and Use
shall be in accordance with a contractual agreement or with an
established internal procedure.
5.1 Controlled stimulation, that is, the application of me-
chanical or thermal load, can generateAE from flawed areas of
6.5 Extent of Examination—Many applications will require
the structure. Sources may include flaw growth, oxide fracture,
an arrangement of sensors such that all areas of the structure
crack face stiction and release on load application, and crack
are monitored. In other applications, only a portion of the
face rubbing.
structure may require monitoring.
5.2 The load range above normal service (peak) load is used
6.6 Reporting Criteria/Acceptance—Reporting criteria for
to propagate fatigue cracks in the plastically strained region
the examination results shall be in accordance with Sections
ahead of the crack tip. Crack propagation may not be a reliable
11, 12, and 13.
source of AE, depending on the alloy and microstructure, the
amount (rate) of crack extension, and possibility of brittle
6.7 Reexamination of Repaired/Reworked Items—
fracture in a segment of crack extension.
Reexamination of repaired/reworked items is not addressed in
5.3 Load increases resulting in significant ductile tearing
this standard and if required shall be specified in a contractual
may produce less emission than expected for the amount of
agreement.
crack growth. Processes that result in more brittle cleavage
fractures are more detectable and produce more emission for
7. Examination Preparation
smaller amounts of flaw growth. These include corrosion
7.1 Before the examination begins, make the following
fatigue and stress corrosion cracking modes of flaw growth,
preparations for AE monitoring:
and would also be more likely in cast or welded structures than
7.1.1 Determine the type, number, and placement of sen-
in fabricated (forged, rolled, or extruded) structures. Distrib-
sors. This requires knowledge of both material and physical
uteddefectstructuressuchashydrogenembrittlement,orcreep
characteristics of the structure and the features of the instru-
cavitation in high temperature steels, may also produce signifi-
cant emission without evidence of an existing crack-like flaw. mentation. This determination is also dependent upon the
required precision and accuracy of the examination.
5.4 Application and relaxation of load can produce second-
7.1.2 Establish communications between the control point
ary mechanically-induced emission that is not related to flaw
for the application of the stimulus and the AE examination
extension. This includes crack face stiction release on
control center.
loading—usually evidenced by emission at the same rising
load value regardless of peak load; or crack face rubbing on
7.1.3 Provide a means for continuously recording a measure
load release as the fracture surfaces come back together.
of the stimulus.
5.5 The load rate can be a significant concern as instrumen- 7.1.4 Identify potential sources of extraneous acoustic
tation can become saturated with AE activity. The ability to noise, such as vibration, friction, and fluid flow. Such sources
differentiate real data from background noise can be compro-
may require acoustic isolation or control, in order not to mask
mised.
valid acoustic emissions.
7.1.5 Attach the sensors; both the couplant and sensing
5.6 Background noise must be fully investigated and mini-
device must be compatible with the surface conditions and the
mized before any AE monitoring can begin.
composition of the structural material being examined (see
6. Basis of Application
Guide E650).
7.1.6 Verify the AE monitoring system in accordance with
6.1 The following items are subject to contractual agree-
ment between the parties using or referencing this practice. Section 9 and Guide E2374.
E569/E569M − 20
8. Safety Precautions 9.3.2 Location Sensitivity Check—A simulated AE source
(such as a pencil lead break) is created on the surface of the
8.1 When examining vessels, ambient temperature should
structure in order to check location sensitivity. Sensor source
not be below the ductile-brittle transition temperature of the
location sensitivity is determined as follows.
pressure vessel construction material.
9.3.2.1 Zone Location Sensitivity Check—Each channel
shall have the same system examination threshold. The simu-
9. Calibration
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: E569/E569M − 13 E569/E569M − 20
Standard Practice for
Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During
Controlled Stimulation
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E569/E569M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year
of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.
A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope*
1.1 This practice provides guidelines for acoustic emission (AE) monitoring of structures, such as pressure vessels, piping
systems, or other structures that can be stressed by mechanical or thermal means.
1.2 The basic functions of an AE monitoring system are to detect, locate, and classify emission sources. Other methods of
nondestructive testing (NDT) may be used to further evaluate the significance of reported acoustic emission sources.
1.3 Units—The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated
in each system mayare not benecessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall
be used independently of the other. Combiningother, and values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the
standards.shall not be combined.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E543 Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive Testing
E650 Guide for Mounting Piezoelectric Acoustic Emission Sensors
E750E976 Practice for Characterizing Acoustic Emission InstrumentationGuide for Determining the Reproducibility of Acoustic
Emission Sensor Response
E1316 Terminology for Nondestructive Examinations
E2374 Guide for Acoustic Emission System Performance Verification
2.2 Other Documents:
SNT-TC-1A Recommended Practice for Nondestructive Testing Personnel Qualification and Certification
ANSI/ASNT CP-189 Standard for Qualification and Certification of Nondestructive Testing Personnel
2.3 AIA Standard:
NAS-410 Certification and Qualification of Nondestructive Testing Personnel
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions—Definitions of terms relating to acoustic emission may be found in Section B of Terminology E1316.
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 AE activity—the presence of acoustic emission during an examination.
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E07 on Nondestructive Testing and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E07.04 on Acoustic Emission
Method.
Current edition approved Jan. 1, 2013Jan. 15, 2020. Published January 2013February 2020. Originally approved in 1976. Last previous edition approved in 20072013 as
E569 - 07.E569/E569M – 13. DOI: 10.1520/E0569_E0569M-13.10.1520/E0569_E0569M-20.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Available from American Society for Nondestructive Testing (ASNT), P.O. Box 28518, 1711 Arlingate Ln., Columbus, OH 43228-0518, http://www.asnt.org.
Available from Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. (AIA), 1000 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1700, Arlington, VA 22209-3928, http://www.aia-aerospace.org.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E569/E569M − 20
3.2.1 active source—source, n—one which exhibits increasing cumulative AE activity with increasing or constant stimulus.
3.2.2 AE activity, n—the presence of acoustic emission during an examination.
3.2.3 AE source intensity, n—average energy, counts, or amplitude per hit.
3.2.4 critically active source—source, n—one which exhibits an increasing rate of change of cumulative AE activity with
increasing or constant stimulus.
3.2.5 AE source intensity—critically intense source, n—average energy, counts or amplitude per hit.one in which the AE source
intensity consistently increases with increasing stimulus or with time under constant stimulus.
3.2.6 intense source—source, n—one in which the AE source intensity of an active source consistently exceeds, by a specified
amount, the average AE source intensity of active sources.
3.2.6 critically intense source—one in which the AE source intensity consistently increases with increasing stimulus or with
time under constant stimulus.
4. Summary of Practice
4.1 Acoustic emission examination of a structure usually requires application of a mechanical or thermal stimulus. Such
stimulation produces changes in the stresses in the structure. During stimulation of a structure, AE from discontinuities (such as
cracks and inclusions) and from other areas of stress concentration, or from other acoustic sources (such as leaks, loose parts, and
structural motion) can be detected by an instrumentation system, using sensors which, when stimulated by stress waves, generate
electrical signals.
4.2 In addition to immediate evaluation of the emissions detected during the application of the stimulus, a permanent record of
the number and location of emitting sources and the relative amount of AE detected from each source provides a basis for
comparison with sources detected during the examination and during subsequent stimulation.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 Controlled stimulation i.e. stimulation, that is, the application of mechanical or thermal load, can generate AE from flawed
areas of the structure. Sources may include flaw growth, oxide fracture, crack face stiction and release on load application, and
crack face rubbing.
5.2 The load range above normal service (peak) load is used to propagate fatigue cracks in the plastically strained region ahead
of the crack tip. Crack propagation may not be a reliable source of AE, depending on the alloy and microstructure, the amount (rate)
of crack extension, and possibility of brittle fracture in a segment of crack extension.
5.3 Load increases resulting in significant ductile tearing may produce less emission than expected for the amount of crack
growth. Processes that result in more brittle cleavage fractures are more detectable and produce more emission for smaller amounts
of flaw growth. These include corrosion fatigue and stress corrosion cracking modes of flaw growth, and would also be more likely
in cast or welded structures than in fabricated (forged, rolled, or extruded) structures. Distributed defect structures such as
hydrogen embrittlement, or creep cavitation in high temperature steels, may also produce significant emission without evidence
of an existing crack-like flaw.
5.4 Application and relaxation of load can produce secondary mechanically-induced emission that is not related to flaw
extension. This includes crack face stiction release on loading—usually evidenced by emission at the same rising load value
regardless of peak load; or crack face rubbing on load release as the fracture surfaces come back together.
5.5 The load rate can be a significant concern as instrumentation can become saturated with AE activity. The ability to
differentiate real data from background noise can be compromised.
5.6 Background noise must be fully investigated and minimized before any AE monitoring can begin.
6. Basis of Application
6.1 The following items are subject to contractual agreement between the parties using or referencing this practice.
6.2 Personnel Qualification
6.2.1 If specified in the contractual agreement, personnel performing examinations to this standard shall be qualified in
accordance with a nationally and internationally recognized NDT personnel qualification practice or standard such as
ANSI/ASNT CP-189, SNT-TC-1A, NAS-410, or a similar document and certified by the employer or certifying agency, as
applicable. The practice or standard used and its applicable revision shall be identified in the contractual agreement between the
using parties.
6.3 Qualification of Nondestructive Testing Agencies—If specified in the contractual agreement, NDT agencies shall be qualified
and evaluated as described in PracticeSpecification E543. The applicable edition of PracticeSpecification E543 shall be specified
in the contractual agreement.
E569/E569M − 20
6.4 Timing of Examination—The timing of the examination shall be in accordance with a contractual agreement or with an
established internal procedure.
6.5 Extent of Examination—Many applications will require an arrangement of sensors such that all areas of the structure are
monitored. In other applications, only a portion of the structure may require monitoring.
6.6 Reporting Criteria/Acceptance—Reporting criteria for the examination results shall be in accordance with Sections 11, 12,
and 13.
6.7 Reexamination of Repaired/Reworked Items—Reexamination of repaired/reworked items is not addressed in this standard
and if required shall be specified in a contractual agreement.
7. Examination Preparation
7.1 Before the examination begins, make the following preparations for AE monitoring:
7.1.1 Determine the type, number, and placement of sensors. This requires knowledge of both material and physical
characteristics of the structure and the features of the instrumentation. This determination is also dependent upon the required
precision and accuracy of the examination.
7.1.2 Establish communications between the control point for the application of the stimulus and the AE examination control
center.
7.1.3 Provide a means for continuously recording a measure of the stimulus.
7.1.4 Identify potential sources of extraneous acoustic noise, such as vibration, friction, and fluid flow. Such sources may require
acoustic isolation or control, in order not to mask valid acoustic emissions.
7.1.5 Attach the sensors; both the couplant and sensing device must be compatible with the surface conditions and the
composition of the structural material being examined (see Guide E650).
7.1.6 Verify the AE monitoring system in accordance with Section 9 and Guide E2374.
8. Safety Precautions
8.1 When examining vessels, ambient temperature should not be below the ductile-brittle transition temperature of the pressure
vessel construction material.
9. Calibration and Verification
9.1 Annual calibration and verification of pressure transducer, AE sensors, preamplifiers (if applicable), signal processor
(particularly the signal processor time refe
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...