ASTM E2675-22
(Practice)Standard Practice for Asset Management System Outcomes
Standard Practice for Asset Management System Outcomes
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This practice establishes expected outcomes associated with an asset management system.
4.2 Understand the difference between performance standards and design standards—these are primarily performance statements versus design statements. What is being measured is achievement, not process.
4.3 This practice encourages an inclusive understanding and communication of the outcomes associated with an asset management system. As additional standards are added, comparisons on this basis to other asset management systems can be further enabled.
4.4 This practice, in combination with Practice E2279, should provide an enhanced basis for making decisions surrounding both assets and asset management systems.
4.5 This practice is intended to foster and enable additional standard practices related to or based on the terms and concepts in the outcomes and outcome components. In particular, this practice may suggest a standard for personal and management skills useful in efforts to achieve these outcomes.
4.6 This practice is to evaluate how robust the asset management system is, and guide future corrections and improvements.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes expected outcomes associated with an asset management system. It is a measure of achievement rather than process and is performance oriented rather than design oriented.
1.2 Outcomes are defined as information, events, objects, or states of being produced as a result or consequence of an objective, plan, process, accident, effort, or other similar action or occurrence and can be expressed in a quantitative or qualitative manner.
1.3 An output measure is the tabulation, calculation, or recording of activity or effort and can be expressed in a quantitative or qualitative manner. For example, an output is driving 100 mph; an outcome is arriving safely.
1.4 An outcome measure is an assessment of the results of a program activity compared to its intended purpose. This practice assumes that inputs are correlated to known or declared outputs of the system or system component being assessed.
1.5 Consistent with Practice E2452 (EMPM), these outcomes are grouped into process management outcomes and operational outcomes.
1.5.1 Although they may be directly related, strategies and tactics should not be confused with outcomes. Strategies are long-term plans of action designed to achieve a particular goal. Tactics are maneuvers or actions calculated to achieve some end. For example, increasing exercise is a strategy to attain the goal or outcome of fitness. Running is a supporting tactic to achieve the goal or outcome of fitness. Other tactics or groups of tactics may achieve the same outcome. On the other hand, as the definition of outcome indicates, tactics are not required for attaining outcomes. For example, fitness may be an unplanned result of a job requiring physical exertion.
1.6 This practice describes the outcomes at a high level, with limited discussion of each outcome or components of each outcome. The intent is to provide a framework for current and potential additional standards. A cross reference relating current standards to the outcomes is provided in Section 5.
1.7 The outcomes further described in Section 5 are listed in the following:
1.7.1 Process Management Outcomes:
1.7.1.1 Outcome 1—Mission Support
1.7.1.2 Outcome 2—Accounting and Accountability
1.7.1.3 Outcome 3—Information Management
1.7.1.4 Outcome 4—Planning
1.7.1.5 Outcome 5—Relationships
1.7.2 Operational Outcomes:
1.7.2.1 Outcome 6—Asset Functionality for Intended Purpose
1.7.2.2 Outcome 7—Resource Optimization
1.7.2.3 Outcome 8—Asset Visibility
1.7.2.4 Outcome 9—Safety and Security
1.7.2.5 Outcome 10—Installation, Movement, and Storage
1.8 In Section 5, a rating scale is provided to quantify in a uniform manner achievement of outcomes and outcome components.
1.9 This practice, in combination with Practice E2279,...
General Information
Relations
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: E2675 − 22
Standard Practice for
1
Asset Management System Outcomes
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2675; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 1.6 This practice describes the outcomes at a high level,
withlimiteddiscussionofeachoutcomeorcomponentsofeach
1.1 This practice describes expected outcomes associated
outcome. The intent is to provide a framework for current and
with an asset management system. It is a measure of achieve-
potential additional standards. A cross reference relating cur-
ment rather than process and is performance oriented rather
rent standards to the outcomes is provided in Section 5.
than design oriented.
1.7 TheoutcomesfurtherdescribedinSection5arelistedin
1.2 Outcomes are defined as information, events, objects, or
the following:
states of being produced as a result or consequence of an
1.7.1 Process Management Outcomes:
objective, plan, process, accident, effort, or other similar action
1.7.1.1 Outcome 1—Mission Support
or occurrence and can be expressed in a quantitative or
1.7.1.2 Outcome 2—Accounting and Accountability
qualitative manner.
1.7.1.3 Outcome 3—Information Management
1.3 An output measure is the tabulation, calculation, or
1.7.1.4 Outcome 4—Planning
recording of activity or effort and can be expressed in a
1.7.1.5 Outcome 5—Relationships
quantitative or qualitative manner. For example, an output is
1.7.2 Operational Outcomes:
driving 100 mph; an outcome is arriving safely.
1.7.2.1 Outcome 6—Asset Functionality for Intended Pur-
pose
1.4 An outcome measure is an assessment of the results of
1.7.2.2 Outcome 7—Resource Optimization
a program activity compared to its intended purpose. This
1.7.2.3 Outcome 8—Asset Visibility
practice assumes that inputs are correlated to known or
1.7.2.4 Outcome 9—Safety and Security
declared outputs of the system or system component being
1.7.2.5 Outcome 10—Installation, Movement, and Storage
assessed.
1.8 In Section 5, a rating scale is provided to quantify in a
1.5 Consistent with Practice E2452 (EMPM), these out-
uniform manner achievement of outcomes and outcome com-
comes are grouped into process management outcomes and
ponents.
operational outcomes.
1.5.1 Although they may be directly related, strategies and
1.9 This practice, in combination with Practice E2279,
tactics should not be confused with outcomes. Strategies are
clarifies and enables effective and efficient control and tracking
long-term plans of action designed to achieve a particular goal.
of assets and may provide an enhanced basis for making
Tactics are maneuvers or actions calculated to achieve some
decisions surrounding both property and property management
end. For example, increasing exercise is a strategy to attain the
systems.
goal or outcome of fitness. Running is a supporting tactic to
1.10 This practice is intended to be applicable and appro-
achieve the goal or outcome of fitness. Other tactics or groups
priate for all asset-holding entities.
oftacticsmayachievethesameoutcome.Ontheotherhand,as
1.11 This practice covers tangible assets and tangible prop-
the definition of outcome indicates, tactics are not required for
erty as defined in Terminology E2135. Consistent with the
attaining outcomes. For example, fitness may be an unplanned
nomenclature used, individual portions of the practice may be
result of a job requiring physical exertion.
applicable to more limited subsets of tangible assets, for
example, to equipment and not to material.
1
1.12 This practice assumes competence and subject matter
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E53 on Asset
Management and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E53.01 on Process
expertise of those performing the assessment and those being
Management.
assessed.(Forexample,asspecifiedintheGAOYellowBook.)
Current edition approved Feb. 1, 2022. Published March 2022. Originally
The use of professional judgment by asset management pro-
approved in 2009. Last previous edition approved in 2014 as E2675–09 (2014).
DOI: 10.1520/E2675-22. fessionals is required to achieve desired outcomes.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
E2675 − 22
1.13 This standard does not purport to address all of the E2812 Practice for Uniform Data Management in Asset
safety concern
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: E2675 − 09 (Reapproved 2014) E2675 − 22
Standard Practice for
1
PropertyAsset Management System Outcomes
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2675; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This practice describes expected outcomes associated with a propertyan asset management system. It is a measure of
achievement rather than process,process and is descriptive performance oriented rather than prescriptive.design oriented.
1.2 Outcomes are defined as information, events, objects, or states of being produced as a result or consequence of a an objective,
plan, process, accident, effort, or other similar action or occurrence.occurrence and can be expressed in a quantitative or qualitative
manner.
1.3 An output measure is the tabulation, calculation, or recording of activity or effort and can be expressed in a quantitative or
qualitative manner. For example, an output is driving 100 mph; an outcome is arriving safely.
1.4 An outcome measure is an assessment of the results of a program activity compared to its intended purpose. This practice
assumes that inputs are correlated to known or declared outputs of the system or system component being assessed.
1.5 Consistent with Practice E2452, (EMPM), these outcomes are grouped into process management outcomes and operational
outcomes.
1.5.1 Although they may be directly related, strategies and tactics should not be confused with outcomes. Strategies are long-term
plans of action designed to achieve a particular goal. Tactics are maneuvers or actions calculated to achieve some end. For example,
increasing exercise is a strategy to attain the goal or outcome of fitness. Running is a supporting tactic to achieve the goal or
outcome of fitness. Other tactics or groups of tactics may achieve the same outcome. On the other hand, as the definition of
outcome indicates, tactics are not required for attaining outcomes. For example, fitness may be an unplanned result of a job
requiring physical exertion.
1.6 This practice describes the outcomes at a high level, with limited discussion of each outcome or components of each outcome.
The intent is to provide a framework for current and potential additional standards. A cross reference relating current standards to
the outcomes is provided in Section 5.
1.7 The outcomes further described in Section 5, are listed in the following:
1.7.1 Process Management Outcomes:
1.7.1.1 Outcome 1—Mission Support
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E53 on Asset Management and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E53.01 on Process Management.
Current edition approved June 1, 2014Feb. 1, 2022. Published June 2014March 2022. Originally approved in 2009. Last previous edition approved in 20092014 as
E2675–09. –09 (2014). DOI: 10.1520/E2675-09R14.10.1520/E2675-22.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
E2675 − 22
1.7.1.2 Outcome 2—Accounting and Accountability
1.7.1.3 Outcome 3—Information Management
1.7.1.4 Outcome 4—Planning
1.7.1.5 Outcome 5—Relationships
1.7.2 Operational Outcomes:
1.7.2.1 Outcome 6—Property Functionality6—Asset Functionality for Intended Purpose
1.7.2.2 Outcome 7—Resource Optimization
1.7.2.3 Outcome 8—Property8—Asset Visibility
1.7.2.4 Outcome 9—Safety and Security
1.7.2.5 Outcome 10—Installation, Movement, and Storage
1.8 In Section 5, a rating scale is provided to quantify in a uniform manner achievement of outcomes and outcome components.
1.9 This practice, in combination with Practice E2279, clarifies and enables effective and efficient control and tracking of
propertyassets and may provide an enhanced basis for making decisions surrounding both property and property management
systems.
1.10 This practice is intended to be applicable and appropriate for all property-holdingasset-holding entities.
1.11 This practice covers tangible assets and tangible property as defined in Terminology E2135. Consistent with the nomenclature
used, individual portions of the practice may be applicable to more limited subsets of tangible property,assets, for example, to
equipment and not to material.
1.12 This practice assumes competence and subject matte
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.