ASTM C1871-22
(Test Method)Standard Test Method for Determination of Uranium Isotopic Composition by the Double Spike Method Using a Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer
Standard Test Method for Determination of Uranium Isotopic Composition by the Double Spike Method Using a Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Uranium material is used as a fuel in certain types of nuclear reactors. To be suitable for use as nuclear fuel, the starting material shall meet certain specifications such as those described in Specifications C753, C776, C787, C833, C967, C996, and C1008, or as specified by the purchaser. The 235U/238U isotope amount ratios and the amount content of uranium material can be measured by mass spectrometry following this test method to ensure that they meet the specification.
5.2 The double spike method has been used for studies of uranium fractionation effects in isotope geochemistry and cosmochemistry, for uranium source attribution in nuclear forensics and for investigation of conversion or sampling processes in nuclear industry and nuclear safeguards (7-11). Most recently, the double spike method has been used for the validation of the Cristallini sampling method of UF6 (12 and 13). The double spike method can be used for a wide range of sample sizes even in samples containing as low as 50 μg of uranium. The concentration of the loading solution for the DS method has to be in the range of 1 to 6 mg/g to allow a sample loading of 4 to 6 μg of uranium. A minimum loading of 4 μg uranium per filament is recommended.
5.3 The measurement of 236U/238U ratios using this method is not possible due to the large isobaric interference from the 236U ion beam of the double spike onto the 236U ion beam from the sample (>50.000 times for close to natural material, for example, like IRMM-184).
5.4 The application of the double spike method for measurements of 235U/238U ratio is limited by the isobaric interference between the 236U from the double spike material and the 236U contained in the sample. As a consequence, the method is not suitable for samples which contain significant amounts of 236U due to prior neutron capture from 235U in the predecessor materials. For samples with 236U/238U ratios higher than about 10–6, the double spike method should be applied with...
SCOPE
1.1 This test method describes the determination of the isotope amount ratios of uranium material as nitrate solutions by the double spike (DS) method using a thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) instrument.
1.2 The analytical performance in the determination of the 235U/238U major isotope amount ratio by the DS method is five to ten times better in terms of the internal and external reproducibility compared to the (“classical”) total evaporation (TE) method as described in Test Method C1672 and the “modified total evaporation” (MTE) as described in Test Method C1832. This is due to the use of an internal rather than external mass fractionation correction by using a double spike material with a known or certified 233U/236U isotope ratio, which is mixed with the sample prior to the measurement, either during the sample preparation or directly on the TIMS filament.
1.3 The DS method cannot be applied for the determination of the 236U/238U minor isotope amount ratio, and is also not recommended for the determination of the 234U/238U minor isotope amount ratio.
1.4 In case the uranium amount concentration of the double spike is known or certified, the uranium amount concentration of the sample can be determined using the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) method as described in Test Method C1672, by blending the sample gravimetrically with the double spike and performing a DS measurement.
1.5 An external mass fractionation correction by measurements of a certified reference material loaded on different filaments and measured in the same measurement sequence, as recommended for TE and required for MTE measurements, is not necessary for the DS method. However, for quality control (QC) purposes it is recommended to perform DS measurements of low enriched or natural uranium isotopic reference materials on a regular basis.
1.6 The DS method can only be applied to uranium samples with relative isotope ...
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 31-Jan-2022
- Technical Committee
- C26 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle
- Drafting Committee
- C26.05 - Methods of Test
Relations
- Effective Date
- 01-Jan-2024
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2023
- Effective Date
- 01-Jul-2020
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2020
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2020
- Effective Date
- 01-Feb-2020
- Effective Date
- 01-Jan-2020
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2019
- Effective Date
- 01-Sep-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Jan-2017
- Effective Date
- 01-Feb-2016
- Effective Date
- 01-Jul-2015
- Effective Date
- 01-Jul-2015
- Effective Date
- 01-Feb-2015
- Effective Date
- 15-Jun-2014
Overview
ASTM C1871-22 is the internationally recognized standard test method for determining uranium isotopic composition using the double spike (DS) method with a thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS). This method is essential for accurately measuring the 235U/238U isotope ratios and quantifying uranium content in nitrate solutions. It provides significantly improved precision and reproducibility compared to traditional total evaporation (TE) and modified total evaporation (MTE) methods, making it highly valuable in nuclear fuel cycle applications, isotope geochemistry, and nuclear forensic investigations.
Key Topics
- Double Spike Method (DS): Uses a spike material with a certified 233U/236U ratio to correct for mass fractionation internally during measurements, enhancing accuracy and precision in uranium isotope ratio determinations.
- 235U/238U Ratio Measurement: The DS method significantly outperforms classical TE and MTE approaches for this key isotope ratio, an essential specification for nuclear-grade uranium fuels.
- Sample Applicability: The method is primarily suitable for low-enriched or natural uranium samples with low 236U/238U and 233U/236U abundances; not recommended for samples with high minor isotope concentrations.
- Mass Spectrometry Instrumentation: Requires a TIMS instrument with multi-collector systems and high precision Faraday cups. Careful calibration, conditioning, and control of sample purity are vital to avoid isobaric and contamination interferences.
- Quality Assurance: Internal correction through double spike addition eliminates the need for external mass fractionation corrections. Regular calibration with certified reference materials (CRM) and quality control checks are recommended.
Applications
The ASTM C1871-22 standard supports a wide range of practical and regulatory needs:
- Nuclear Fuel Manufacturing: Ensures uranium materials meet precise isotopic specifications for use in reactors, as referenced in ASTM specifications C753, C776, C787, C833, C967, and C996.
- Isotope Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry: Facilitates detailed studies of uranium fractionation for geochemical tracing and research on natural or extraterrestrial materials.
- Nuclear Forensics and Safeguards: Assists with source attribution and process verification in non-proliferation, security, and regulatory compliance.
- Validation of Sampling Methods: Used to validate advanced uranium sampling and conversion processes, such as the Cristallini method for uranium hexafluoride (UF6).
- Trace Analysis: Capable of handling very small sample sizes, down to 50 μg uranium per analysis.
Related Standards
Compliance with ASTM C1871-22 often requires reference to or integration with other key ASTM standards:
- C1672: Total evaporation method for uranium/plutonium isotopic composition by TIMS
- C1832: Modified total evaporation method for uranium isotopic composition
- C753, C776, C787, C833, C967, C996: Specifications for uranium dioxide, uranium hexafluoride, and other nuclear-grade materials
- C859, C1068, C1128, C1156: Terminology and guidelines for calibration, method qualification, and preparation of reference materials in nuclear analysis
- D1193: Specifications for reagent water used in sample preparation
Practical Value
By following ASTM C1871-22, laboratories, fuel manufacturers, and regulatory bodies can:
- Achieve higher precision uranium isotope ratio measurements essential for nuclear material certification.
- Reduce measurement bias and uncertainties inherent in external fractionation correction methods.
- Enhance confidence in analytical data for nuclear safeguard purposes, supporting global regulatory and non-proliferation frameworks.
- Support the development of new analytical and sampling techniques in uranium processing and environmental science.
By adhering to this standard, professionals ensure both regulatory compliance and scientific rigor in uranium isotopic analysis.
Buy Documents
ASTM C1871-22 - Standard Test Method for Determination of Uranium Isotopic Composition by the Double Spike Method Using a Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer
REDLINE ASTM C1871-22 - Standard Test Method for Determination of Uranium Isotopic Composition by the Double Spike Method Using a Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

DNV
DNV is an independent assurance and risk management provider.

Lloyd's Register
Lloyd's Register is a global professional services organisation specialising in engineering and technology.

DNV Energy Systems
Energy and renewable energy certification.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM C1871-22 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Test Method for Determination of Uranium Isotopic Composition by the Double Spike Method Using a Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Uranium material is used as a fuel in certain types of nuclear reactors. To be suitable for use as nuclear fuel, the starting material shall meet certain specifications such as those described in Specifications C753, C776, C787, C833, C967, C996, and C1008, or as specified by the purchaser. The 235U/238U isotope amount ratios and the amount content of uranium material can be measured by mass spectrometry following this test method to ensure that they meet the specification. 5.2 The double spike method has been used for studies of uranium fractionation effects in isotope geochemistry and cosmochemistry, for uranium source attribution in nuclear forensics and for investigation of conversion or sampling processes in nuclear industry and nuclear safeguards (7-11). Most recently, the double spike method has been used for the validation of the Cristallini sampling method of UF6 (12 and 13). The double spike method can be used for a wide range of sample sizes even in samples containing as low as 50 μg of uranium. The concentration of the loading solution for the DS method has to be in the range of 1 to 6 mg/g to allow a sample loading of 4 to 6 μg of uranium. A minimum loading of 4 μg uranium per filament is recommended. 5.3 The measurement of 236U/238U ratios using this method is not possible due to the large isobaric interference from the 236U ion beam of the double spike onto the 236U ion beam from the sample (>50.000 times for close to natural material, for example, like IRMM-184). 5.4 The application of the double spike method for measurements of 235U/238U ratio is limited by the isobaric interference between the 236U from the double spike material and the 236U contained in the sample. As a consequence, the method is not suitable for samples which contain significant amounts of 236U due to prior neutron capture from 235U in the predecessor materials. For samples with 236U/238U ratios higher than about 10–6, the double spike method should be applied with... SCOPE 1.1 This test method describes the determination of the isotope amount ratios of uranium material as nitrate solutions by the double spike (DS) method using a thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) instrument. 1.2 The analytical performance in the determination of the 235U/238U major isotope amount ratio by the DS method is five to ten times better in terms of the internal and external reproducibility compared to the (“classical”) total evaporation (TE) method as described in Test Method C1672 and the “modified total evaporation” (MTE) as described in Test Method C1832. This is due to the use of an internal rather than external mass fractionation correction by using a double spike material with a known or certified 233U/236U isotope ratio, which is mixed with the sample prior to the measurement, either during the sample preparation or directly on the TIMS filament. 1.3 The DS method cannot be applied for the determination of the 236U/238U minor isotope amount ratio, and is also not recommended for the determination of the 234U/238U minor isotope amount ratio. 1.4 In case the uranium amount concentration of the double spike is known or certified, the uranium amount concentration of the sample can be determined using the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) method as described in Test Method C1672, by blending the sample gravimetrically with the double spike and performing a DS measurement. 1.5 An external mass fractionation correction by measurements of a certified reference material loaded on different filaments and measured in the same measurement sequence, as recommended for TE and required for MTE measurements, is not necessary for the DS method. However, for quality control (QC) purposes it is recommended to perform DS measurements of low enriched or natural uranium isotopic reference materials on a regular basis. 1.6 The DS method can only be applied to uranium samples with relative isotope ...
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Uranium material is used as a fuel in certain types of nuclear reactors. To be suitable for use as nuclear fuel, the starting material shall meet certain specifications such as those described in Specifications C753, C776, C787, C833, C967, C996, and C1008, or as specified by the purchaser. The 235U/238U isotope amount ratios and the amount content of uranium material can be measured by mass spectrometry following this test method to ensure that they meet the specification. 5.2 The double spike method has been used for studies of uranium fractionation effects in isotope geochemistry and cosmochemistry, for uranium source attribution in nuclear forensics and for investigation of conversion or sampling processes in nuclear industry and nuclear safeguards (7-11). Most recently, the double spike method has been used for the validation of the Cristallini sampling method of UF6 (12 and 13). The double spike method can be used for a wide range of sample sizes even in samples containing as low as 50 μg of uranium. The concentration of the loading solution for the DS method has to be in the range of 1 to 6 mg/g to allow a sample loading of 4 to 6 μg of uranium. A minimum loading of 4 μg uranium per filament is recommended. 5.3 The measurement of 236U/238U ratios using this method is not possible due to the large isobaric interference from the 236U ion beam of the double spike onto the 236U ion beam from the sample (>50.000 times for close to natural material, for example, like IRMM-184). 5.4 The application of the double spike method for measurements of 235U/238U ratio is limited by the isobaric interference between the 236U from the double spike material and the 236U contained in the sample. As a consequence, the method is not suitable for samples which contain significant amounts of 236U due to prior neutron capture from 235U in the predecessor materials. For samples with 236U/238U ratios higher than about 10–6, the double spike method should be applied with... SCOPE 1.1 This test method describes the determination of the isotope amount ratios of uranium material as nitrate solutions by the double spike (DS) method using a thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) instrument. 1.2 The analytical performance in the determination of the 235U/238U major isotope amount ratio by the DS method is five to ten times better in terms of the internal and external reproducibility compared to the (“classical”) total evaporation (TE) method as described in Test Method C1672 and the “modified total evaporation” (MTE) as described in Test Method C1832. This is due to the use of an internal rather than external mass fractionation correction by using a double spike material with a known or certified 233U/236U isotope ratio, which is mixed with the sample prior to the measurement, either during the sample preparation or directly on the TIMS filament. 1.3 The DS method cannot be applied for the determination of the 236U/238U minor isotope amount ratio, and is also not recommended for the determination of the 234U/238U minor isotope amount ratio. 1.4 In case the uranium amount concentration of the double spike is known or certified, the uranium amount concentration of the sample can be determined using the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) method as described in Test Method C1672, by blending the sample gravimetrically with the double spike and performing a DS measurement. 1.5 An external mass fractionation correction by measurements of a certified reference material loaded on different filaments and measured in the same measurement sequence, as recommended for TE and required for MTE measurements, is not necessary for the DS method. However, for quality control (QC) purposes it is recommended to perform DS measurements of low enriched or natural uranium isotopic reference materials on a regular basis. 1.6 The DS method can only be applied to uranium samples with relative isotope ...
ASTM C1871-22 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 27.120.30 - Fissile materials and nuclear fuel technology. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM C1871-22 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM C859-24, ASTM C1672-23, ASTM C1411-20, ASTM C787-20, ASTM C996-20, ASTM C967-20, ASTM E2655-14(2020), ASTM E2586-19e1, ASTM C1156-18, ASTM C1672-17, ASTM C753-16, ASTM C996-15, ASTM C787-15, ASTM C1128-15, ASTM C859-14a. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM C1871-22 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: C1871 − 22
Standard Test Method for
Determination of Uranium Isotopic Composition by the
Double Spike Method Using a Thermal Ionization Mass
Spectrometer
This standard is issued under the fixed designation C1871; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope ments of low enriched or natural uranium isotopic reference
materials on a regular basis.
1.1 This test method describes the determination of the
isotope amount ratios of uranium material as nitrate solutions 1.6 TheDSmethodcanonlybeappliedtouraniumsamples
233 –5
by the double spike (DS) method using a thermal ionization with relative isotope abundances U/U below 10 and
236 –4
mass spectrometer (TIMS) instrument. U/Ubelow5×10 ,theDSmethodisthereforemainlyused
for low enriched or close to natural uranium samples.
1.2 The analytical performance in the determination of the
235 238
U/ UmajorisotopeamountratiobytheDSmethodisfive 1.7 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded
to ten times better in terms of the internal and external as the standard. When no SI units are provided, the values are
reproducibility compared to the (“classical”) total evaporation for information only.
(TE) method as described in Test Method C1672 and the
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the
“modified total evaporation” (MTE) as described in Test
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
MethodC1832.Thisisduetotheuseofan internalratherthan
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
external mass fractionation correction by using a double spike
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
233 236
material with a known or certified U/ U isotope ratio,
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
which is mixed with the sample prior to the measurement,
1.9 This international standard was developed in accor-
either during the sample preparation or directly on the TIMS
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
filament.
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
1.3 The DS method cannot be applied for the determination
236 238
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
of the U/ U minor isotope amount ratio, and is also not
234 238
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
recommended for the determination of the U/ U minor
isotope amount ratio.
2. Referenced Documents
1.4 In case the uranium amount concentration of the double
2.1 ASTM Standards:
spike is known or certified, the uranium amount concentration
C753Specification for Nuclear-Grade, Sinterable Uranium
of the sample can be determined using the isotope dilution
Dioxide Powder
mass spectrometry (IDMS) method as described in Test
C776SpecificationforSinteredUraniumDioxidePelletsfor
Method C1672, by blending the sample gravimetrically with
Light Water Reactors
the double spike and performing a DS measurement.
C787Specification for Uranium Hexafluoride for Enrich-
1.5 An external mass fractionation correction by measure-
ment
ments of a certified reference material loaded on different
C833Specification for Sintered (Uranium-Plutonium) Diox-
filaments and measured in the same measurement sequence, as
ide Pellets for Light Water Reactors
recommended for TE and required for MTE measurements, is
C859Terminology Relating to Nuclear Materials
not necessary for the DS method. However, for quality control
C967Specification for Uranium Ore Concentrate
(QC) purposes it is recommended to perform DS measure-
C996Specification for Uranium Hexafluoride Enriched to
Less Than 5% U
ThistestmethodisunderthejurisdictionofASTMCommitteeC26onNuclear
Fuel Cycle and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee C26.05 on Methods of
Test. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved Feb. 1, 2022. Published March 2022. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 2018. Last previous edition approved in 2018 as C1871–18a. DOI: Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
10.1520/C1871-22. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
C1871 − 22
C1008 Specification for Sintered (Uranium-Plutonium) 3.3 Acronyms:
DioxidePellets—Fast Reactor Fuel (Withdrawn 2014) 3.3.1 CRM—certified reference material
C1068Guide for Qualification of Measurement Methods by
3.3.2 DS—double spike
a Laboratory Within the Nuclear Industry
3.3.3 DU—depleted uranium
C1128Guide for Preparation of Working Reference Materi-
3.3.4 EU—European Union
als for Use in Analysis of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Materials
C1156Guide for Establishing Calibration for a Measure-
3.3.5 FAR—Faraday Cup
ment Method Used toAnalyze Nuclear Fuel Cycle Mate-
3.3.6 HEU—high enriched uranium
rials
3.3.7 IAEA—International Atomic Energy Agency
C1347Practice for Preparation and Dissolution of Uranium
Materials for Analysis
3.3.8 ICPMS—inductively coupled mass spectrometry
C1411Practice for The Ion Exchange Separation of Ura-
3.3.9 IRMM—Institute for Reference Materials and Mea-
nium and Plutonium Prior to Isotopic Analysis
surements (since 1 July 2016 called JRC-Geel, the only unit
C1672Test Method for Determination of Uranium or Pluto-
working with nuclear materials at JRC-Geel is JRC-G.2)
nium Isotopic Composition or Concentration by the Total
3.3.10 ITU—Institute for Transuranium Elements (since 1
Evaporation Method Using a Thermal Ionization Mass
July 2016 called JRC-Karlsruhe, the only unit involved with
Spectrometer
thermalionizationmassspectrometrymeasurementsofnuclear
C1832Test Method for Determination of Uranium Isotopic
materials at JRC-Karlsruhe is JRC-G.II.6)
Composition by Modified Total Evaporation (MTE)
Method Using Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer
3.3.11 JRC—Joint Research Centre
D1193Specification for Reagent Water
3.3.12 LEU—low enriched uranium
E2586Practice for Calculating and Using Basic Statistics
3.3.13 MTE—modified total evaporation
E2655Guide for Reporting Uncertainty of Test Results and
Use of the Term Measurement Uncertainty inASTM Test 3.3.14 NBL—New Brunswick Laboratory (since 15 May
2016 called NBL-Program Office)
Methods
3.3.15 NML—Nuclear Material Laboratory (part of the
3. Terminology
IAEA)
3.1 Terminology C859 contains terms, definitions, descrip-
3.3.16 QC—quality control
tions of terms, nomenclature, and explanations of acronyms
3.3.17 RSD—relative standard deviation—SD (see below)
and symbols specifically associated with standards under the
divided by the mean value of the observations in repeated
jurisdiction of Committee C26 on Nuclear Fuel Cycle.
sampling.
3.2 Definitions:
3.3.18 RSE—relative standard error—SE (see below) di-
3.2.1 abundance sensitivity, n—in isotope amount ratio
vided by the mean value of the observations in repeated
measurements, the ratio of the measured intensity of an ion
sampling.
beam at a mass, m, to the measured intensity from the same
3.3.19 SD—standard deviation—according to Practice
isotope measured at one mass unit difference (for example, m
6 1). E2586, 3.1.30: The square root of the sum of the squared
deviations of the observed values in the sample divided by the
3.2.1.1 Discussion—Abundance sensitivity is a measure of
the magnitude of the peak tailing correction. For measuring sample size minus 1.
uranium on thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) and
3.3.20 SE—standard error—according to Practice E2586,
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)
3.1.29: Standard deviation of the population of values of a
instruments,theabundancesensitivityistypicallycalculatedas
sample statistic (that is, the mean value) in repeated
the ratio of the measured signal intensities at masses 237 and
measurements, or an estimate of it.
238 using a suitable uranium sample.
3.3.20.1 Discussion—According to Practice E2586, 3.1.30:
3.2.2 modified total evaporation, MTE, n—analytical If the standard error (SE, see above) of a statistic is estimated,
method for determination of isotope amount ratios of uranium, it will itself be a statistic with some variance that depends on
as described in Test Method C1832. the sample size, that is, the number of observed values in the
sample (Practice E2586, 3.1.26).
3.2.3 total evaporation, TE, n—analytical method for deter-
3.3.20.2 Discussion—According to Practice E2655, 5.8.4.1:
mination of isotope amount ratios of uranium or plutonium, as
Fromstatisticaltheory,a95%confidenceintervalforthemean
described in Test Method C1672, also called “classical” total
of a normal distribution, given n independent observations x ,
evaporation in this test method. 1
x ,.,x drawnfromthedistribution,isx¯ 6t×SD/√n,where
2 n
3.2.4 turret, n—holder for sample filaments.
x¯ is the sample mean, SD is the standard deviation of the
3.2.4.1 Discussion—Alternate names for turret are carousel,
observations (see above), and t is the 0.975 percentile of the
magazine, and wheel.
Student’s t distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom. Because
Student’s t distribution approaches the normal as n increases,
the value of t approaches 1.96 as n increases. This is the basis
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
www.astm.org. forusingthe(coverage)factor2forexpandeduncertainty.The
C1871 − 22
standard error (SE) of the mean value of a series of n This measurement can be performed using the TE or MTE
independent repeated measurements can be derived from that methods (Test Methods C1672 and C1832, respectively).
by usingt=1,sothe standard error (SE) is given by SD /√n.
5. Significance and Use
3.3.21 TIMS—thermal ionization mass spectrometry
5.1 Uranium material is used as a fuel in certain types of
3.3.22 WRM—working reference material
nuclear reactors. To be suitable for use as nuclear fuel, the
starting material shall meet certain specifications such as those
4. Summary of Test Method
described in Specifications C753, C776, C787, C833, C967,
4.1 The double spike method has been developed with the
C996, and C1008, or as specified by the purchaser. The
235 238
intention to improve the precision and decrease the uncertain-
U/ U isotope amount ratios and the amount content of
235 238
ties for U/ U major isotope ratio measurements compared
uranium material can be measured by mass spectrometry
to the known methods such as the “classical” total evaporation
following this test method to ensure that they meet the
technique (1-4), alsodescribedinTestMethodC1672,andthe
specification.
modified total evaporation technique (5 and 6), also described
5.2 The double spike method has been used for studies of
in Test Method C1832. For the double spike method the mass
uranium fractionation effects in isotope geochemistry and
235 238
fractionation correction for the U/ U ratio is performed
cosmochemistry, for uranium source attribution in nuclear
internally throughout the measurement rather than externally,
forensics and for investigation of conversion or sampling
by using the mass fractionation observed for a double spike
processes in nuclear industry and nuclear safeguards (7-11).
233 236
materialwithaknownorcertified U/ Uisotoperatio(also
Most recently, the double spike method has been used for the
spanning three mass units), which is mixed with the sample
validation of the Cristallini sampling method of UF (12 and
prior to the measurement, either during the sample preparation
13). The double spike method can be used for a wide range of
or directly on the TIMS filament. If necessary, uranium is
sample sizes even in samples containing as low as 50 µg of
separated from plutonium and other elements (to eliminate
uranium. The concentration of the loading solution for the DS
isobaric interferences) by selective extraction, anion exchange
method has to be in the range of 1 to 6 mg/g to allow a sample
(see Practice C1411), or extraction chromatography. The puri-
loading of 4 to 6 µg of uranium. A minimum loading of 4 µg
fied uranium fraction as nitrate solution is loaded onto an
uranium per filament is recommended.
evaporation filament (made of metals such as rhenium, zone-
236 238
5.3 The measurement of U/ U ratios using this method
refined rhenium, or tungsten with high evaporation
is not possible due to the large isobaric interference from the
temperature), and blended with an appropriate amount of
236 236
Uionbeamofthedoublespikeontothe Uionbeamfrom
double spike solution, and converted to an oxide by controlled
the sample (>50.000 times for close to natural material, for
heating of the filament under atmospheric conditions. In case
235 238
example, like IRMM-184).
only the U/ U ratio of the sample has to be determined, it
is recommended to mix the sample with the double spike
5.4 The application of the double spike method for mea-
235 238
duringtheloadingprocessonthefilament.Incasetheuranium
surements of U/ U ratio is limited by the isobaric inter-
amount concentration of the sample has to be determined, the
ference between the U from the double spike material and
sample solution has to be blended gravimetrically with the
the U contained in the sample. As a consequence, the
double spike solution prior to filament loading, for which
method is not suitable for samples which contain significant
236 235
weighable amounts have to be used.
amounts of U due to prior neutron capture from Uinthe
236 238
predecessor materials. For samples with U/ U ratios
4.2 The sample amount to be loaded for DS analyses is
–6
higher than about 10 , the double spike method should be
within a range of about 4 to 6 µg to achieve ion beam signals
appliedwithcarefortheisobariccorrection.Foranappropriate
ofabout20to30Vforthemajorisotope UforDU,NU,and
236 238
isobaric correction, the U/ U ratios of the samples should
LEU samples.
be determined separately using a suitable measurement
235 238
4.3 The U/ U isotope amount ratios are corrected for
method, for example, the modified total evaporation MTE
mass fractionation for each integration step individually. This
method (Test Method C1832, Ref (5) and (6)).
is accomplished in an internal manner, the magnitude of the
234 238
5.5 The measurement of U/ U ratios using this method
mass fractionation is calculated from the measured mass
233 236
isverylimitedintheanalyticalperformanceduetotheisobaric
fractionation of the U/ U ratio. The peak tailing contribu-
234 234
interference of the U from the double spike with the U
tions are determined at two mass positions, 0.5 mass units
from the sample (range from 5 to 15%). The correction
below and 0.5 mass units above the isotope masses of interest.
algorithms are presented in 14.3, but statements for precision
4.4 For the correction of isobaric interferences, a separate
and bias are not given. Other methods like MTE (Test Method
measurement of the isotopic composition of the (unspiked)
C1832, Ref (5) and (6)) are better suited and more reliable for
sampleisrequired,unlessthisinformationisalreadyavailable.
234 238
measurements of U/ U ratios.
5.6 The DS method described here can also be extended to
4 measurement of elements other than uranium, if a suitable
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to a list of references at the end of
this standard. double spike material is available.
C1871 − 22
6. Interferences 7.1.3 Amultiple Faraday collector system to allow simulta-
+
neousdetectionofisotopebeamsfrom m/z=233to238forU
6.1 Isobaric nuclides such as Pu interfere in the uranium
ions;
measurements. The removal of interferences is generally ac-
7.1.4 For the Faraday cups used to measure the major ion
complished by chemical separation leading to ionization of
235 238
beams of U and U, there shall be current amplifiers
uranium only and improved precision of measured isotope
11 233
equipped with 10 Ω resistors and, for the ion beams of U
amount ratios.
and U, there shall be current amplifiers equipped with at
234 235 236 238
11 12
6.2 For the isotopes U, U, U, and U isobaric
least 10 Ω, and preferably 10 Ω resistors to improve the
interferences between the sample and the double spike occur.
signal-to-noise ratio. In case the ion beam of U is below the
233 236
The accurate correction of isobaric interferences is a prerequi-
ion beams of U and U, the use of an amplifier equipped
site for obtaining results for the DS method with satisfactory
with a 10 Ω resistor is recommended, if available.
precisionandaccuracy.Thecorrectionsdependstronglyonthe
7.1.5 A sample turret to allow automatic measurement
mixing proportions between the sample and the double spike.
sequencesofseveralreplicatefilamentloadingspersampleand
Usually the sample/spike amount ratio is adjusted in such a
per quality control standard (preferentially a CRM);
manner that the ion beam intensity at mass m/z=236 is lower
7.1.6 A pumping system that is able to attain a vacuum of
–5 –7
compared to that at mass m/z=235, in order to reduce the
<4.0 × 10 Pa (3 × 10 torr) in the ion source, the analyzer,
influences from low-mass tailings, that is, abundance
and the detector is required. Tailing corrections are dependent
sensitivities, at one mass unit below and beyond the U peaks.
on the vacuum levels inside the mass spectrometer. Analyzer
–7 –9
Therefore a sample-to-spike amount ratio of >20 is recom-
pressures below 7.0 × 10 Pa (5 × 10 torr) are preferred;
mended. The correction of isobaric interferences is explained
7.1.7 Amechanism to scan masses by varying the magnetic
in detail in Section 14 (“calculations”) of this test method.
field or the accelerating voltage or both;
7.1.8 Acomputer for control of the data acquisition accord-
6.3 It has to be ensured that samples are not contaminated
ing to a predefined sequence.
by environmental uranium. The level of effort required to
minimize contamination shall be based upon the sample size
7.2 Special MTE Capabilities—Itisrecommendedtohavea
and the levels of contamination present in the analytical
massspectrometersoftwaretobeflexibleenoughtoimplement
facility. For extremely small samples or extremely low U
a user-defined filament-heating program as for MTE.
abundances, residual uranium from chemicals used for sample
7.3 Aseparate filament degassing device for cleaning of the
dissolution and sample preparation is possible source for bias
filaments before sample loading can be used.
in the isotopic data.
7.4 Apipette or microsyringe to transfer microliter volumes
6.4 Samples shall be chemically purified to assure reliable
of solution.
analyses by TIMS. Impurities, especially alkali elements,
7.5 A separate filament heating device for drying and
produce unstable ion emission leading to poor precision in the
isotopeamountratios.Organiccontaminantsoroxidelayerson oxidizing the sample on the filament ribbon after loading.
the filaments also adversely influence TIMS analyses. Isobaric
interferences, if not removed, will bias the isotope amount 8. Reagents and Materials
ratios.Contaminantsinreagents,labware,orfilamentmaterial
8.1 Purity of Reagents—Ultra-high purity reagents shall be
are also sources for bias in the isotope amount ratios.
used for processing small sample amounts or samples with
6.5 The performance of the instrument can be adversely extremely small isotope amount ratios. The level of uranium
affected by changes in the environmental conditions of the contamination from chemicals, water, and the sample handling
laboratory, that is, temperature and humidity. For this reason, environments shall be determined to ensure that the materials
controlled laboratory environmental conditions should be andtheenvironmentaresufficientlypureforthesamplesbeing
maintained (within the manufacturer’s specifications) during analyzed.
instrument operation.
8.2 Nitric Acid (HNO , 15.8 M)—Concentrated nitric acid.
8.3 Nitric Acid (HNO , 1 M)—One volume of concentrated
7. Apparatus
nitric acid (HNO , 15.8 M) brought to 15.8 volumes with
7.1 Thesuitabilityofthemassspectrometerforcarryingout
water.
measurements by the DS method shall be evaluated by means
8.4 Purity of Water—Unless otherwise indicated, references
of performance tests. The relevant instrument characteristics
to water shall be understood to mean laboratory accepted
are as follows:
demineralized or deionized water as described by Type I of
7.1.1 A thermal ionization source for using single, double,
Specification D1193.
or triple filament assemblies with rhenium or tungsten
filaments, or both;
7.1.2 A mass analyzer sufficient to resolve adjacent masses
The sole source of supply of the apparatus known to the committee at this time
inthemass-to-chargerangebeingstudied, m/z=233to238for
+ is Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., 81 Wyman St., Waltham, MA 02451. If you are
U . Resolution shall be greater than 350 (full width at 1% of
aware of alternative suppliers, please provide this information to ASTM Interna-
peakheight)andtheabundancesensitivityatmass237forions
tional Headquarters.Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting
238 –6
of U less than8×10 ; of the responsible technical committee, which you may attend.
C1871 − 22
8.5 Filaments—Filaments with sufficient purity, for 11. Preparation of Apparatus
example, zone refined or high purity Re or W, should be used.
11.1 Filament Degassing—Filaments can be degassed be-
The size and configuration of the filament is instrument
foreusingthemforDSmeasurements.Thisisrecommendedin
dependent.
casetheheatingofthefilamentsduringthemassspectrometric
8.6 Liquid Nitrogen—Liquid nitrogen can be filled into the
measurement is causing the vacuum pressure in the ion source
–4 –6
cold trap of a mass spectrometer to improve the vacuum
to increase beyond 1.3 × 10 Pa (1 × 10 torr) is reached.
pressure.
Recommended filament currents for degassing are in the range
4.0 to 5.0 A, corresponding to temperatures in the range of
9. Hazards
1700 to 2000°C. Perform the degassing for a duration of at
least 30 min.
9.1 TIMS instruments operate at 8 to 10 kV electrical
potential. Ensure that the high-voltage is switched off before
11.2 “Initialization” of the Sample Turret—Adjust, if
insertion or removal of the sample turret into/from the
needed, the position of the sample turret in the ion source and
instrument,andworkingwiththeionsource,oraccessingother
verify proper electrical connections for both the evaporation
electronic components.
and ionization filament for each sample loading position. It
9.2 The filaments reach temperatures in excess of 2000°C. shall be ensured that the electrical contact is not interrupted in
The filament holders, sample wheel, and ion sources parts are
case the turret is slightly moved for the purpose of ion beam
expected to be hot. Ensure that a sufficient time has lapsed focusing.
since the last filament heating before accessing the filaments,
11.3 Electronics Test—Modern mass spectrometric instru-
sample turrets, and ion source.
ments offer an automated routine for testing the stability and
9.3 Wear eye protection and suitable gloves when filling
performance of the electronic systems (for example, Faraday
coldtrapswithliquidnitrogen.Protecthands,torso,andfeetin
cup amplifier baselines and gains, high-voltage unit, and
the event of splashing or spilling of the liquid nitrogen.
magnet current supply units). A report is produced flagging
systems or components that are out of specification. Users of
9.4 Handle radioactive materials with appropriate attention
the instruments should perform routine checks of the perfor-
to radiological safety.
mance of the electronic systems and ensure that the perfor-
9.5 Handle chemical hazards and toxins like uranium with
mance is within manufacturer’s specifications. The frequency
appropriate care.
for this test shall be established by the user based on manu-
facturer recommendations or as specified in the user’s quality
10. Sampling, Test Specimens, and Test Units
assurance program.
10.1 Isotope Reference Materials—Uranium reference ma-
11.4 Amplifier Signal Decay Adjustment—Adjust the signal
terials used in the analysis should be prepared from certified
decay characteristics of the current amplifiers of the Faraday
reference materials (CRMs) traceable to SI units. Examples
cups. This is important for measuring isotope amount ratios
include the Double Spikes IRMM-3636 (1 mg U/g), IRMM-
with a large dynamic range, high precision and accuracy, or
3636a (0.1 mg U/g), and IRMM-3636b (0.01 mg U/g), which
both. Depending on the combination of the capacitance and
all have the same isotopic composition (uncertainties with
resistance of the current amplifier, the response time for a
coverage factor k = 2, 95% confidence level):
sudden change in the ion beam signal to the Faraday cup can
233 236
U/ U = 1.01906(16),
234 236
reach up to 5 s. For amplifier resistances higher than the 10
U/ U = 0.00036606(48),
235 236
U/ U = 0.000045480(74), and
Ω, longer response times of about 15 s can be expected. The
238 236
U/ U = 0.00023481(38).
DS method has to be designed by taking into consideration the
In addition, various in-house double spike materials are
required response times. The amplifier response can be
being used at numerous facilities, which have been calibrated
checked either using a custom-made software module within
using isotope reference materials, like NBL CRM U500
the operating software (when available), or “manually” by
235 238
( U/ U > 1) or IRMM-184 (close to natural U). For the
means of a large ion beam that is abruptly directed into a
preparation of in-house double spike reference materials, see
Faraday cup to check the signal ingrowth time, or away from
Guide C1128 for additional guidance on preparation of trace-
a Faraday cup (for example, by closing a valve between ion
able working reference materials.
source and analyzer) to check the signal decay time.
10.2 Uraniumsamplestobemeasuredandisotopereference
11.5 Ion Source and Analyzer Pressure—It is important to
materialsusedforqualitycontrolpurposesshallbeinthesame
achieve a certain level of vacuum before the isotope amount
medium, same concentration and in the same oxidation state.
ratio measurements can be started; see 7.1.6 for the recom-
The solutions for loading onto the filaments are usually 1 to 5
mended pressure. The peak tailing depends strongly on the
Mnitricacidsolutions.Theloadinganddryingsequenceofthe
vacuumpressureinthedetectorsystemsincethenumberofion
filaments shall also be similar.
collisionswithgasmoleculesinsidethemassspectrometerisa
10.3 In the case of characterization studies of test materials, direct function of the ambient pressure. An increase of the
possible inhomogeneity between test units shall be evaluated pressure within the ion source caused by the heating of the
statistically and included in the uncertainty calculations of the ionization and evaporation filaments can be subdued, to a
isotope amount ratios assigned. certain extent, by using a cold trap filled with liquid nitrogen.
C1871 − 22
12. Calibration and Standardization performedpriortotheFaradaycupefficiencytest.TheFaraday
NOTE 1—The measurement method may be qualified following Guide cup efficiency test can be performed in several ways, as
C1068 and calibrated following Guide C1156.
described in 12.5.1 – 12.5.4.
12.1 Mass Calibration—The relationship between the 12.5.1 The calibration may be performed by switching a
stable ion beam of Re (from a blank filament) between each
known atomic masses and the magnetic field necessary to
direct the isotope beams into the detectors shall be updated on Faraday cup and a reference Faraday cup. In case a relative
efficiency between the detectors is significantly different from
aregularbasis.Masscalibrationshallbeperformedatintervals
unity, this result can be used to correct for differences in the
specified by the manufacturer or the user’s quality assurance
detector response. This procedure can be performed with a
program.
relative uncertainty at the level of <0.1%.
12.2 Peak Centering—Thepeakcenteringroutineisusedas
12.5.2 Aseries of peak-jumping measurements between all
afineadjustmenttoensurethattheionbeamiscenteredwithin
Faraday cups and a reference cup to be checked can also be
thedetector.Peakcenteringusuallyoccursviafineadjustments
performed using a sufficiently large uranium sample and one
of the accelerating voltage, and any difference between the
large stable ion beam, for example, a 10 to 20 V ion beam of
value optimized during peak centering from the default accel-
U from a LEU or natural uranium sample. The drift of the
erating voltage requires a readjustment of the mass calibration
signal intensity shall be corrected for using the operating
curve. Peak centering shall be performed for at least at three
software. This procedure can be performed with a relative
uranium masses as part of the mass calibration before the start
uncertainty at the level of <0.01%.
of each DS measurement sequence. During the DS
12.5.3 A series of comparative neodymium (Nd) isotope
measurement, peak centering is performed on a regular basis.
amount of ratio measurements can be performed in two
12.3 Amplifier Baseline Calibration—The baselines of the
different modes such as the multi-dynamic mode and the static
TM
Faraday cup amplifiers, that is, the amplifier responses without
mode with “amplifier rotation” (only for TRITON TIMS,
incoming ion beam to the cup, shall be measured on a regular
also called “virtual amplifier”: each Faraday cup is connected
basis and checked for stability. During the DS measurements,
toeachamplifierforregulartimeintervalsduringthemeasure-
baseline measurements are performed on a regular basis. Note
ment). This procedure can be performed with a relative
that the integration time for the baseline measurement has a
uncertainty at the level of few ppm (5). It shall be repeated
significant influence on the uncertainty of Faraday cup
until all Faraday cups of interest for DS measurements have
measurements, particularly at lower ion beam intensities.
been included.
Therefore, the integration time of the baseline (within a
12.5.4 A series of static measurements can be performed
measurement) shall be comparable to the integration time of
using special “multi-isotope” reference materials, such as
theactualionbeamsignalintegration.Thelong-termhistorical 233 235 236 238
IRMM-3100a ( U/ U/ U/ U=1/1/1/1), IRMM-072/1,
233 235 238
baseline data shall be regularly reviewed by the user to assure
IRMM-074/1, or IRMM-199 ( U/ U/ U=1/1/1), to in-
that the system performance is within manufacturer specifica-
clude all Faraday cups. This procedure can be performed with
tions and quality system requirements.
relative uncertainties of about 0.03%.
12.4 Amplifier Gain Calibration—The stability and re-
12.6 Linearity Test—There are various procedures to check
sponse of individual Faraday detector amplifiers shall be
the linearity of an isotope mass spectrometer detection system.
measured and differences between amplifiers corrected for via
The procedures described in 12.6.1 and 12.6.2 are mainly
the amplifier gain calibration. Gain calibration is normally
applicable for Faraday multi-collector systems.
performed by sequentially applying a stable calibration current
12.6.1 The linearity of the mass spectrometer is determined
to the input of each Faraday cup amplifier and the output is
over the working range of the Faraday cups by measuring the
then normalized to a reference value to generate a gain 235 238
U/ U ratios of various reference materials under identical
calibration factor for each amplifier.Again calibration shall be
conditions. The mass spectrometer system is linear if the K
performed prior to each automatic DS sequence. Historical 235 238
factor, that is, the ratio of the certified U/ U ratio to the
235 238
gaincalibrationdatacanbeusedtoevaluatethestabilityofthe
measured U/ U ratio, is independent of the isotopic
amplifiers.
composition of the material. For this procedure, the NBL
U-seriesofreferencematerials(U005atoU970,0.5to97%of
12.5 Faraday Cup Effıciency Test—The response of indi-
U) is ideal and can be combined with the IRMM-183-187
vidual Faraday cups depends on several factors, for example,
series(0.3to5%of U)andtheIRMM019-029series(0.17
extent of usage, manufacturing variability, and can also be
to5%of U,tobeconvertedfromUF ).Thisprocedureshall
affected by an insufficient electron suppression voltage. The
be performed sequentially for all Faraday cups of the multi-
relative response of the Faraday cups, therefore, shall be
collector system needed for the DS analyses.
determined periodically. Usually, the Faraday cups of a multi-
collector system are only intercalibrated for the current ampli- 12.6.2 The IRMM-072 and IRMM-074 series of reference
238 235
fiers connected to them (see 12.4) but not for the differences in materials are characterized by U/ U ratios of ≈1 and
233 235 –6
the efficiencies of the Faraday cups themselves. The efficien- U/ U ratios ranging from ≈1 down to ≈10 for the 15 or
cies of the Faraday cups are expected to be similar to each 10units,respectively,oftheusedseries.Foreachunit,thebias
238 235
other,whichmeansthattherelativeefficiencies(relativetoone ofthemeasured U/ Uratiosfromthecertifiedonescanbe
reference cup) are normally close to unity. Note that an used for internal mass fractionation correction of the measured
233 235 233 235
(electronic) amplifier gain calibration (see 12.4) shall be U/ U ratios. The comparison of the corrected U/ U
C1871 − 22
ratios with the certified ones allows the linearity of the 13.1.3 Sample Purification—Use Practice C1411 or similar
detection system to be checked over a dynamic range of six procedure to separate uranium from plutonium and other
orders of magnitude for the ion beam intensity. A detailed impurities, if necessary.
description of the procedure is given in (14). This procedure
13.2 Sample Loading and Conditioning—Samples for the
shallbeperformedsequentiallyforallFaradaycupsneededfor
DS method are usually directly loaded on the filament by drop
the DS analyses.
deposition. Samples and QC materials shall be prepared for
12.7 Peak Overlap—When a Faraday multi-collector sys-
analysis by the same method at similar mass loadings. Drop
temforthesimultaneousdetectionofseveralmassesisused,it deposition onto the filament can be accomplished with the use
needstobeensuredthatthepeakoverlapisacceptable.Amass
ofamicrosyringeorpipettefittedwithaplastictip.Changethe
scan, usually by scanning the magnetic field, shall be per- tipbetweensampleloadingstopreventcrosscontamination.In
formed by which all ion beams are simultaneously moved
particular for loading and mixing a sample solution and the
through the respective cups. The measured intensities for all double spike solution on the same filament, cross contamina-
detectors shall be plotted versus the mass of a reference
tion between these solutions has to be prevented by changing
detector to make the peak overlap visible.All peaks shall have pipette tips. It is recommended to load the double spike
a symmetric shape with a common flat region in the center, solution first and the sample afterwards in order to minimize
withthepeakcentersreasonablyclosetogether,asspecifiedby
the risk of contaminating the double spike solution with any
themanufacturerortheuserqualitysystem.Afterasatisfactory sample material. For filaments loaded by drop deposition, the
peak overlap is realized (by moving cups relative to one
solution shall be evaporated by passing sufficient electrical
another if necessary), the positions of all detectors shall be current through the filament to cause gentle drying without
saved, for example, as a Faraday cup configuration file. The
boiling. Samples for DS are usually prepared ina1to5 M
positionsshallbecheckedandpossiblyreadjusted,manuallyor nitric acid with a uranium concentration between 1 to 6 mg/g,
using stepping motors, as needed before a new automatic
whichisequivalentto1to6µg/µL.Dependingontheuranium
measurement sequence. amount to be loaded, more than 1 µL of the sample solution
may be needed. The recommended uranium amount for load-
12.8 Mass Fractionation Correction:
ing is 4 to 6 µg. Deposit drops very carefully and slowly. It is
12.8.1 For the double spike method the mass fractionation
235 238
recommended to keep the filament heated by passing 0.5 to
correction for the U/ U ratio is performed for each
0.7A current and depositing 1-µL-drops at a time. After all
integration step (called “mass cycle,” see below) internally
drops are loaded, the solution on the filament is heated until
throughout the measurement rather than externally, by using
dryness, for at least one more minute, and then heated for
the mass fractionation observed for a double spike material
233 236
several seconds at a higher current of 1.5 to 2.0A for
with a known or certified U/ U isotope ratio (also span-
conditioning. Alternatively, a stepped-heating program can be
ning three mass units).
used to condition samples, that is, to convert samples to
12.8.2 The mass fractionation correction factor, K, is calcu-
suitable chemical forms. Avoid quick evaporation of the
lated as follows:
sample or melting the filament.At different facilities, different
K 5 ~R ⁄ R ! (1)
c m
loadingandconditioningprocedureshavebeenestablishedand
validated. Each procedure shall be applied in a consistent
where:
manner for all samples, and quality control samples.
K = mass fractionation correction factor,
233 236
R = measured U/ U isotope amount ratio for the
m 13.3 Mountallsamplefilamentsandionizationfilamentson
double spike, and
a sample turret and insert the sample turret into the ion source
233 236
R = known or certified U/ U isotope amount ratio
c
of the mass spectrometer.
value for the double spike.
13.4 Close the source and start evacuating.
Details about the mass fractionation and further correction
13.5 Perform adjustment (also called initialization) of the
algorithms are presented in 14.2.
sample turret if needed. In case of problems with electrical
13. Procedure
connections, the source might have to be vented again to
resolve the problem.
13.1 Sample Preparation:
13.1.1 Sample Dissolution—Dissolveanappropriatesample
13.6 Evacuate ion source to the manufacturer’s recom-
amount to obtain the desired filament loading solution for the
mended minimum pressure or according to the user’s proce-
mass spectrometric analysis. See Practice C1347 for the
dure.
dissolution of uranium.
13.7 Add liquid nitrogen to the cold trap if desired.
13.1.2 Prepare the sample and any reference material solu-
13.8 Isotope Amount Ratio Measurement—The following
tions as purified nitrates, using identical chemical preparation
steps 13.8.1 – 13.10 are typically performed automatically
and handling steps. For uranium samples hydrolyzed from
under computer control depending upon the instrument.
uranium hexafluoride, it is recommended that the samples are
13.8.1 Perform an amplifier gain calibration for each new
converted to U O before dissolution in nitric acid and analy-
3 8
sis. The solution concentrations shall be chosen to allow for a automatic sequence.
convenient filament loading (for example, a 2-mg U/mL 13.8.2 Measure the baseline during the course of each
solution yields 2 µg of uranium per µL, see also 13.2). measurement of a sample and QC standard.
C1871 − 22
13.8.3 Usually under computer control, the ionization fila- 13.9 Interblock Actions and Filament Heating for DS:
ment is heated up to a temperature of about 1800 to 1950°C. 13.9.1 Peak Centering and Baseline—Each measurement
For automatic sequences, usually the magnitude of the Re block usually consists of a maximum of five mass cycles, with
ion beam is used as the regulated quantity instead of the each cycle having a duration of about 60 to 90 s. Before each
filament temperature by a pyrometer because only the narrow block, a peak centering is performed using the U isotope.
sides of the filaments are oriented towards the pyrometer. Additionally, an ion source focusing is performed before each
187 11
Typical Re ion beams of about 300 to 600 mV(on a 10 Ω block. Typically, every five blocks, the electronic baselines of
resistor) are used for non-zone refined filaments and lower all the Faraday cup amplifiers are re-measured. In case 10 Ω
values of 150 to 400 mV are used for zone-refined filaments, resistors are used in some of the amplifiers, the idle times for
depending on the thickness and brand. the baseline measurements have to be sufficiently long, for
13.8.4 The Re ion beam is peak centered and focused. If example, at least 15 s.
necessary, the Re ion beam size is readjusted towards the 13.9.2 DS Interblock Heating—The DS interblock heating
target value, which shall be similar (within about 20%) for isrecommendedtobeperformedsimilartotheMTEinterblock
each measurement within an automatic sequence, by changing heating as described in Test Method C1832. The filament
the filament current. heatingiscontrolledbyaspecialprogramscriptexecutedafter
13.8.5 The sample filament is heated to a temperature each measurement block. This program script first measures
235 235 238
sufficient to yield and ion beam sum intensity from U and the actual sum intensity (mainly from U and U) and
238 11
U of about 1 to 4V(on an amplifier with a 10 Ω resistor). compares it with the predefined (initial) target sum intensity.
The beam is focused and peak centered using the largest U ion This predefined target sum intensity is typically in the range of
beam, which is usually the U beam. 20 to 30 V, selected by the operator depending on the sample
13.8.6 Data acquisition is started. The data acquisition is amount loaded, the experience with the ion source and the
performedonaperblockbasisinwhicheachblockconsistsof instrument transmission. Based on the comparison of the
a minimum of two and a maximum of five mass cycles and actually measured sum intensity with the target sum intensity,
each mass cycle of (usually) four integration steps. The data the following filament heating step is calculated. A detailed
acquisition is usually continued until the whole sample is description of the interblock heating script is given in Test
evaporated; see 13.10. Method C1832.
13.8.7 DS Mass Cycle—The DS mass cycle consists of four
13.10 Termination of DS Measurement—The DS measure-
steps as shown in Table 1. Depending on the ion beam
ment is terminated when the sum intensity is below a user-
intensities observed the use of amplifiers with 10 Ω resistors
defined limit of 1 to 2 V.
is recommended. For the recommended sample-to-spike
233 236
14. Calculations
amount ratios >20, the U and U intensities coming from
thedoublespikeshallbedetectedusingamplifierswith10 Ω
14.1 Within this section, the DS data evaluation and calcu-
resistors, if available, in case of depleted samples with low
lation of the various correction factors is discussed. The mass
235 238
U ion beams this applies as well.
fractionation correction for the major ratios U/ Uis
13.8.7.1 The first step is the main integration for all iso-
performed internally for each mass cycle throughout the
233 236
topes; the integration time is usually about 16 s.
measurement based on the results of the U/ U ratio using
13.8.7.2 In Steps 2 and 3 of the DS mass cycle, the
the exponential fractionation law. The differences between
background intensities at the low and high mass side of all
different fractionation laws, for example, power law, exponen-
uranium isotopes of interest are measured. The mutual back-
tiallaw,linearlaw,orRayleighlawareattheleveloffewparts
235 236
grounds for U and U are the most critical ones and
per million for heavy elements like uranium, which is insig-
dependalotonthesampletospikeratio.Duetothedifferences
nificant for the DS measurements.
in the tailing effect between the low and high mass sides, an 235 238
14.2 Evaluation for Major Ratio U/ U:
interpolation for the isotope ratios shall be performed, using a
233 236
14.2.1 The K factor is derived from the U/ U ratio for
linear appr
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: C1871 − 18a C1871 − 22
Standard Test Method for
Determination of Uranium Isotopic Composition by the
Double Spike Method Using a Thermal Ionization Mass
Spectrometer
This standard is issued under the fixed designation C1871; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method describes the determination of the isotope amount ratios of uranium material as nitrate solutions by the double
spike (DS) method using a thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) instrument.
235 238
1.2 The analytical performance in the determination of the U/ U major isotope amount ratio by the DS method is five to ten
times better in terms of the internal and external reproducibility compared to the (“classical”) total evaporation (TE) method as
described in Test Method C1672 and the “modified total evaporation” (MTE) as described in Test Method C1832. This is due to
the use of an internal rather than external mass fractionation correction by using a double spike material with a known or certified
233 236
U/ U isotope ratio, which is mixed with the sample prior to the measurement, either during the sample preparation or directly
on the TIMS filament.
236 238
1.3 The DS method cannot be applied for the determination of the U/ U minor isotope amount ratio, and is also not
234 238
recommended for the determination of the U/ U minor isotope amount ratio.
1.4 In case the uranium amount concentration of the double spike is known or certified, the uranium amount concentration of the
sample can be determined using the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) method as described in Test Method C1672, by
blending the sample gravimetrically with the double spike and performing a DS measurement.
1.5 An external mass fractionation correction by measurements of a certified reference material loaded on different filaments and
measured in the same measurement sequence, as recommended for TE and required for MTE measurements, is not necessary for
the DS method. However, for quality control (QC) purposes it is recommended to perform DS measurements of low enriched or
natural uranium isotopic reference materials on a regular basis.
233 –5 236
1.6 The DS method can only be applied to uranium samples with relative isotope abundances U/U below 10 and U/U
–5–4
below 5 × 10 , the DS method is therefore mainly used for low enriched or close to natural uranium samples.
1.7 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. When no SI units are provided, the values are for
information only.
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee C26 on Nuclear Fuel Cycle and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee C26.05 on Methods of Test.
Current edition approved June 1, 2018Feb. 1, 2022. Published July 2018March 2022. Originally approved in 2018. Last previous edition approved in 2018 as
C1871 – 18.C1871 – 18a. DOI: 10.1520/C1871-18A.10.1520/C1871-22.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
C1871 − 22
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.9 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
C753 Specification for Nuclear-Grade, Sinterable Uranium Dioxide Powder
C776 Specification for Sintered Uranium Dioxide Pellets for Light Water Reactors
C787 Specification for Uranium Hexafluoride for Enrichment
C833 Specification for Sintered (Uranium-Plutonium) Dioxide Pellets for Light Water Reactors
C859 Terminology Relating to Nuclear Materials
C967 Specification for Uranium Ore Concentrate
C996 Specification for Uranium Hexafluoride Enriched to Less Than 5 % U
C1008 Specification for Sintered (Uranium-Plutonium) DioxidePellets—Fast Reactor Fuel (Withdrawn 2014)
C1068 Guide for Qualification of Measurement Methods by a Laboratory Within the Nuclear Industry
C1128 Guide for Preparation of Working Reference Materials for Use in Analysis of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Materials
C1156 Guide for Establishing Calibration for a Measurement Method Used to Analyze Nuclear Fuel Cycle Materials
C1347 Practice for Preparation and Dissolution of Uranium Materials for Analysis
C1411 Practice for The Ion Exchange Separation of Uranium and Plutonium Prior to Isotopic Analysis
C1672 Test Method for Determination of Uranium or Plutonium Isotopic Composition or Concentration by the Total
Evaporation Method Using a Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer
C1832 Test Method for Determination of Uranium Isotopic Composition by Modified Total Evaporation (MTE) Method Using
Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer
D1193 Specification for Reagent Water
E2586 Practice for Calculating and Using Basic Statistics
E2655 Guide for Reporting Uncertainty of Test Results and Use of the Term Measurement Uncertainty in ASTM Test Methods
3. Terminology
3.1 Terminology C859 contains terms, definitions, descriptions of terms, nomenclature, and explanations of acronyms and
symbols specifically associated with standards under the jurisdiction of Committee C26 on Nuclear Fuel Cycle.
3.2 Definitions:
3.2.1 abundance sensitivity, n—in isotope amount ratio measurements, the ratio of the measured intensity of an ion beam at a mass,
m, to the measured intensity from the same isotope measured at one mass unit difference (for example, m 6 1).
3.2.1.1 Discussion—
Abundance sensitivity is a measure of the magnitude of the peak tailing correction. For measuring uranium on thermal ionization
mass spectrometer (TIMS) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) instruments, the abundance sensitivity
is typically calculated as the ratio of the measured signal intensities at masses 237 and 238 using a suitable uranium sample.
3.2.2 modified total evaporation, MTE, n—analytical method for determination of isotope amount ratios of uranium, as described
in Test Method C1832.
3.2.3 total evaporation, TE, n—analytical method for determination of isotope amount ratios of uranium or plutonium, as
described in Test Method C1672, also called “classical” total evaporation in this test method.
3.2.4 turret, n—holder for sample filaments.
3.2.4.1 Discussion—
Alternate names for turret are carousel, magazine, and wheel.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on www.astm.org.
C1871 − 22
3.3 Acronyms:
3.3.1 CRM—certified reference material
3.3.2 DS—double spike
3.3.3 DU—depleted uranium
3.3.4 EU—European Union
3.3.5 FAR—Faraday Cup
3.3.6 HEU—high enriched uranium
3.3.7 IAEA—International Atomic Energy Agency
3.3.8 ICPMS—inductively coupled mass spectrometry
3.3.9 IRMM—Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (since 1 July 2016 called JRC-Geel, the only unit working with
nuclear materials at JRC-Geel is JRC-G.2)
3.3.10 ITU—Institute for Transuranium Elements (since 1 July 2016 called JRC-Karlsruhe, the only unit involved with thermal
ionization mass spectrometry measurements of nuclear materials at JRC-Karlsruhe is JRC-G.II.6)
3.3.11 JRC—Joint Research Centre
3.3.12 LEU—low enriched uranium
3.3.13 MTE—modified total evaporation
3.3.14 NBL—New Brunswick Laboratory (since 15 May 2016 called NBL-Program Office)
3.3.15 NML—Nuclear Material Laboratory (part of the IAEA)
3.3.16 QC—quality control
3.3.17 RSD—relative standard deviation—SD (see below) divided by the mean value of the observations in repeated sampling.
3.3.18 RSE—relative standard error—SE (see below) divided by the mean value of the observations in repeated sampling.
3.3.19 SD—standard deviation—according to Practice E2586, 3.1.30: The square root of the sum of the squared deviations of the
observed values in the sample divided by the sample size minus 1.
3.3.20 SE—standard error—according to Practice E2586, 3.1.29: Standard deviation of the population of values of a sample
statistic (that is, the mean value) in repeated measurements, or an estimate of it.
3.3.20.1 Discussion—
According to Practice E2586, 3.1.30: If the standard error (SE, see above) of a statistic is estimated, it will itself be a statistic with
some variance that depends on the sample size, that is, the number of observed values in the sample (Practice E2586, 3.1.26).
3.3.20.2 Discussion—
According to Practice E2655, 5.8.4.1: From statistical theory, a 95 % confidence interval for the mean of a normal distribution,
given n independent observations x , x , ., x drawn from the distribution, is x¯ 6 t × SD / √n, where x¯ is the sample mean,
1 2 n
SD is the standard deviation of the observations (see above), and t is the 0.975 percentile of the Student’s t distribution with n-1
degrees of freedom. Because Student’s t distribution approaches the normal as n increases, the value of t approaches 1.96 as n
C1871 − 22
increases. This is the basis for using the (coverage) factor 2 for expanded uncertainty. The standard error (SE) of the mean value
of a series of n independent repeated measurements can be derived from that by using t = 1, so the standard error (SE) is given
by SD / √n.
3.3.21 TIMS—thermal ionization mass spectrometry
3.3.22 WRM—working reference material
4. Summary of Test Method
4.1 The double spike method has been developed with the intention to improve the precision and decrease the uncertainties for
235 238
U/ U major isotope ratio measurements compared to the known methods such as the “classical” total evaporation technique
(1-4), also described in Test Method C1672, and the modified total evaporation technique (5 and 6), also described in Test Method
235 238
C1832. For the double spike method the mass fractionation correction for the U/ U ratio is performed internally throughout
the measurement rather than externally, by using the mass fractionation observed for a double spike material with a known or
233 236
certified U/ U isotope ratio (also spanning three mass units), which is mixed with the sample prior to the measurement, either
during the sample preparation or directly on the TIMS filament. If necessary, uranium is separated from plutonium and other
elements (to eliminate isobaric interferences) by selective extraction, anion exchange (see Practice C1411), or extraction
chromatography. The purified uranium fraction as nitrate solution is loaded onto an evaporation filament (made of metals such as
rhenium, zone-refined rhenium, or tungsten with high evaporation temperature), and blended with an appropriate amount of double
spike solution, and converted to an oxide by controlled heating of the filament under atmospheric conditions. In case only the
235 238
U/ U ratio of the sample has to be determined, it is recommended to mix the sample with the double spike during the loading
process on the filament. In case the uranium amount concentration of the sample has to be determined, the sample solution has
to be blended gravimetrically with the double spike solution prior to filament loading, for which weighable amounts have to be
used.
4.2 The sample amount to be loaded for DS analyses is within a range of about 4 to 6 μg to achieve ion beam signals of about
20 to 30 V for the major isotope U for DU, NU, and LEU samples.
235 238
4.3 The U/ U isotope amount ratios are corrected for mass fractionation for each integration step individually. This is
accomplished in an internal manner, the magnitude of the mass fractionation is calculated from the measured mass fractionation
233 236
of the U/ U ratio. The peak tailing contributions are determined at two mass positions, 0.5 mass units below and 0.5 mass units
above the isotope masses of interest.
4.4 For the correction of isobaric interferences, a separate measurement of the isotopic composition of the (unspiked) sample is
required, unless this information is already available. This measurement can be performed using the TE or MTE methods (Test
Methods C1672 and C1832, respectively).
5. Significance and Use
5.1 Uranium material is used as a fuel in certain types of nuclear reactors. To be suitable for use as nuclear fuel, the starting
material shall meet certain specifications such as those described in Specifications C753, C776, C787, C833, C967, C996, and
235 238
C1008, or as specified by the purchaser. The U/ U isotope amount ratios and the amount content of uranium material can be
measured by mass spectrometry following this test method to ensure that they meet the specification.
5.2 The double spike method has been used for studies of uranium fractionation effects in isotope geochemistry and
cosmochemistry, for uranium source attribution in nuclear forensics and for investigation of conversion or sampling processes in
nuclear industry and nuclear safeguards (7-11). Most recently, the double spike method has been used for the validation of the
Cristallini sampling method of UF (12 and 13). The double spike method can be used for a wide range of sample sizes even in
samples containing as low as 50 μg of uranium. The concentration of the loading solution for the DS method has to be in the range
of 1 to 6 mg/g to allow a sample loading of 4 to 6 μg of uranium. A minimum loading of 4 μg uranium per filament is recommended.
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to a list of references at the end of this standard.
C1871 − 22
236 238 236
5.3 The measurement of U/ U ratios using this method is not possible due to the large isobaric interference from the U ion
beam of the double spike onto the U ion beam from the sample (>50.000 times for close to natural material, for example, like
IRMM-184).
235 238
5.4 The application of the double spike method for measurements of U/ U ratio is limited by the isobaric interference between
236 236
the U from the double spike material and the U contained in the sample. As a consequence, the method is not suitable for
236 235
samples which contain significant amounts of U due to prior neutron capture from U in the predecessor materials. For
236 238 –6
samples with U/ U ratios higher than about 10 , the double spike method should be applied with care for the isobaric
236 238
correction. For an appropriate isobaric correction, the U/ U ratios of the samples should be determined separately using a
suitable measurement method, for example, the modified total evaporation MTE method (Test Method C1832, Ref (5) and (6)).
234 238
5.5 The measurement of U/ U ratios using this method is very limited in the analytical performance due to the isobaric
234 234
interference of the U from the double spike with the U from the sample (range from 5 to 15 %). The correction algorithms
are presented in 14.3, but statements for precision and bias are not given. Other methods like MTE (Test Method C1832, Ref (5)
234 238
and (6)) are better suited and more reliable for measurements of U/ U ratios.
5.6 The DS method described here can also be extended to measurement of elements other than uranium, if a suitable double spike
material is available.
6. Interferences
6.1 Isobaric nuclides such as Pu interfere in the uranium measurements. The removal of interferences is generally accomplished
by chemical separation leading to ionization of uranium only and improved precision of measured isotope amount ratios.
234 235 236 238
6.2 For the isotopes U, U, U, and U isobaric interferences between the sample and the double spike occur. The accurate
correction of isobaric interferences is a prerequisite for obtaining results for the DS method with satisfactory precision and
accuracy. The corrections depend strongly on the mixing proportions between the sample and the double spike. Usually the
sample/spike amount ratio is adjusted in such a manner that the ion beam intensity at mass m/z=236 is lower compared to that at
mass m/z=235, in order to reduce the influences from low-mass tailings, that is, abundance sensitivities, at one mass unit below
and beyond the U peaks. Therefore a sample-to-spike amount ratio of >20 is recommended. The correction of isobaric interferences
is explained in detail in Section 14 (“calculations”) of this test method.
6.3 It has to be ensured that samples are not contaminated by environmental uranium. The level of effort required to minimize
contamination shall be based upon the sample size and the levels of contamination present in the analytical facility. For extremely
small samples or extremely low U abundances, residual uranium from chemicals used for sample dissolution and sample
preparation is possible source for bias in the isotopic data.
6.4 Samples shall be chemically purified to assure reliable analyses by TIMS. Impurities, especially alkali elements, produce
unstable ion emission leading to poor precision in the isotope amount ratios. Organic contaminants or oxide layers on the filaments
also adversely influence TIMS analyses. Isobaric interferences, if not removed, will bias the isotope amount ratios. Contaminants
in reagents, lab ware, or filament material are also sources for bias in the isotope amount ratios.
6.5 The performance of the instrument can be adversely affected by changes in the environmental conditions of the laboratory, that
is, temperature and humidity. For this reason, controlled laboratory environmental conditions should be maintained (within the
manufacturer’s specifications) during instrument operation.
7. Apparatus
7.1 The suitability of the mass spectrometer for carrying out measurements by the DS method shall be evaluated by means of
performance tests. The relevant instrument characteristics are as follows:
7.1.1 A thermal ionization source for using single, double, or triple filament assemblies with rhenium or tungsten filaments, or
both;
C1871 − 22
+
7.1.2 A mass analyzer sufficient to resolve adjacent masses in the mass-to-charge range being studied, m/z = 233 to 238 for U .
Resolution shall be greater than 350 (full width at 1 % of peak height) and the abundance sensitivity at mass 237 for ions of U
–6
less than 8 × 10 ;
+
7.1.3 A multiple Faraday collector system to allow simultaneous detection of isotope beams from m/z = 233 to 238 for U ions;
235 238
7.1.4 For the Faraday cups used to measure the major ion beams of U and U, there shall be current amplifiers equipped with
11 233 236 11
10 Ω resistors and, for the ion beams of U and U, there shall be current amplifiers equipped with at least 10 Ω, and
12 235 233
preferably 10 Ω resistors to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. In case the ion beam of U is below the ion beams of U and
236 12
U, the use of an amplifier equipped with a 10 Ω resistor is recommended, if available.
7.1.5 A sample turret to allow automatic measurement sequences of several replicate filament loadings per sample and per quality
control standard (preferentially a CRM);
–5 –7
7.1.6 A pumping system that is able to attain a vacuum of <4.0 × 10 Pa (3 × 10 torr) in the ion source, the analyzer, and the
detector is required. Tailing corrections are dependent on the vacuum levels inside the mass spectrometer. Analyzer pressures
–7 –9
below 7.0 × 10 Pa (5 × 10 torr) are preferred;
7.1.7 A mechanism to scan masses by varying the magnetic field or the accelerating voltage or both;
7.1.8 A computer for control of the data acquisition according to a predefined sequence.
7.2 Special MTE Capabilities—It is recommended to have a mass spectrometer software to be flexible enough to implement a
user-defined filament-heating program as for MTE.
7.3 A separate filament degassing device for cleaning of the filaments before sample loading can be used.
7.4 A pipette or microsyringe to transfer microliter volumes of solution.
7.5 A separate filament heating device for drying and oxidizing the sample on the filament ribbon after loading.
8. Reagents and Materials
8.1 Purity of Reagents—Ultra-high purity reagents shall be used for processing small sample amounts or samples with extremely
small isotope amount ratios. The level of uranium contamination from chemicals, water, and the sample handling environments
shall be determined to ensure that the materials and the environment are sufficiently pure for the samples being analyzed.
8.2 Nitric Acid (HNO , 15.8 M)—Concentrated nitric acid.
8.3 Nitric Acid (HNO , 1 M)—One volume of concentrated nitric acid (HNO , 15.8 M) brought to 15.8 volumes with water.
3 3
8.4 Purity of Water—Unless otherwise indicated, references to water shall be understood to mean laboratory accepted
demineralized or deionized water as described by Type I of Specification D1193.
8.5 Filaments—Filaments with sufficient purity, for example, zone refined or high purity Re or W, should be used. The size and
configuration of the filament is instrument dependent.
8.6 Liquid Nitrogen—Liquid nitrogen can be filled into the cold trap of a mass spectrometer to improve the vacuum pressure.
The sole source of supply of the apparatus known to the committee at this time is Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., 81 Wyman St., Waltham, MA 02451. If you are aware
of alternative suppliers, please provide this information to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible
technical committee, which you may attend.
C1871 − 22
9. Hazards
9.1 TIMS instruments operate at 8 to 10 kV electrical potential. Ensure that the high-voltage is switched off before insertion or
removal of the sample turret into/from the instrument, and working with the ion source, or accessing other electronic components.
9.2 The filaments reach temperatures in excess of 2000°C.2000 °C. The filament holders, sample wheel, and ion sources parts are
expected to be hot. Ensure that a sufficient time has lapsed since the last filament heating before accessing the filaments, sample
turrets, and ion source.
9.3 Wear eye protection and suitable gloves when filling cold traps with liquid nitrogen. Protect hands, torso, and feet in the event
of splashing or spilling of the liquid nitrogen.
9.4 Handle radioactive materials with appropriate attention to radiological safety.
9.5 Handle chemical hazards and toxins like uranium with appropriate care.
10. Sampling, Test Specimens, and Test Units
10.1 Isotope Reference Materials—Uranium reference materials used in the analysis should be prepared from certified reference
materials (CRMs) traceable to SI units. Examples include the Double Spikes IRMM-3636 (1 mg U/g), IRMM-3636a (0.1 mg U/g),
and IRMM-3636b (0.01 mg U/g), which all have the same isotopic composition (uncertainties with coverage factor k = 2, 95 %
confidence level):
233 236
U/ U = 1.01906(16),
234 236
U/ U = 0.00036606(48),
235 236
U/ U = 0.000045480(74), and
238 236
U/ U = 0.00023481(38).
In addition, various in-house double spike materials are being used at numerous facilities, which have been calibrated using
235 238
isotope reference materials, like NBL CRM U500 ( U/ U > 1) or IRMM-184 (close to natural U). For the preparation of
in-house double spike reference materials, see Guide C1128 for additional guidance on preparation of traceable working reference
materials.
10.2 Uranium samples to be measured and isotope reference materials used for quality control purposes shall be in the same
medium, same concentration and in the same oxidation state. The solutions for loading onto the filaments are usually 1 to 5 M nitric
acid solutions. The loading and drying sequence of the filaments shall also be similar.
10.3 In the case of characterization studies of test materials, possible inhomogeneity between test units shall be evaluated
statistically and included in the uncertainty calculations of the isotope amount ratios assigned.
11. Preparation of Apparatus
11.1 Filament Degassing—Filaments can be degassed before using them for DS measurements. This is recommended in case the
heating of the filaments during the mass spectrometric measurement is causing the vacuum pressure in the ion source to increase
–4 –6
beyond 1.3 × 10 Pa (1 × 10 torr) is reached. Recommended filament currents for degassing are in the range 4.0 to 5.0 A,
corresponding to temperatures in the range of 1700 to 2000°C.2000 °C. Perform the degassing for a duration of at least 30 min.
11.2 “Initialization” of the Sample Turret—Adjust, if needed, the position of the sample turret in the ion source and verify proper
electrical connections for both the evaporation and ionization filament for each sample loading position. It shall be ensured that
the electrical contact is not interrupted in case the turret is slightly moved for the purpose of ion beam focusing.
11.3 Electronics Test—Modern mass spectrometric instruments offer an automated routine for testing the stability and performance
of the electronic systems (for example, Faraday cup amplifier baselines and gains, high-voltage unit, and magnet current supply
units). A report is produced flagging systems or components that are out of specification. Users of the instruments should perform
routine checks of the performance of the electronic systems and ensure that the performance is within manufacturer’s
specifications. The frequency for this test shall be established by the user based on manufacturer recommendations or as specified
in the user’s quality assurance program.
C1871 − 22
11.4 Amplifier Signal Decay Adjustment—Adjust the signal decay characteristics of the current amplifiers of the Faraday cups.
This is important for measuring isotope amount ratios with a large dynamic range, high precision and accuracy, or both. Depending
on the combination of the capacitance and resistance of the current amplifier, the response time for a sudden change in the ion beam
signal to the Faraday cup can reach up to 5 s. For amplifier resistances higher than the 10 Ω, longer response times of about 15
s can be expected. The DS method has to be designed by taking into consideration the required response times. The amplifier
response can be checked either using a custom-made software module within the operating software (when available), or
“manually” by means of a large ion beam that is abruptly directed into a Faraday cup to check the signal ingrowth time, or away
from a Faraday cup (for example, by closing a valve between ion source and analyzer) to check the signal decay time.
11.5 Ion Source and Analyzer Pressure—It is important to achieve a certain level of vacuum before the isotope amount ratio
measurements can be started; see 7.1.6 for the recommended pressure. The peak tailing depends strongly on the vacuum pressure
in the detector system since the number of ion collisions with gas molecules inside the mass spectrometer is a direct function of
the ambient pressure. An increase of the pressure within the ion source caused by the heating of the ionization and evaporation
filaments can be subdued, to a certain extent, by using a cold trap filled with liquid nitrogen.
12. Calibration and Standardization
NOTE 1—The measurement method may be qualified following Guide C1068 and calibrated following Guide C1156.
12.1 Mass Calibration—The relationship between the known atomic masses and the magnetic field necessary to direct the isotope
beams into the detectors shall be updated on a regular basis. Mass calibration shall be performed at intervals specified by the
manufacturer or the user’s quality assurance program.
12.2 Peak Centering—The peak centering routine is used as a fine adjustment to ensure that the ion beam is centered within the
detector. Peak centering usually occurs via fine adjustments of the accelerating voltage, and any difference between the value
optimized during peak centering from the default accelerating voltage requires a readjustment of the mass calibration curve. Peak
centering shall be performed for at least at three uranium masses as part of the mass calibration before the start of each DS
measurement sequence. During the DS measurement, peak centering is performed on a regular basis.
12.3 Amplifier Baseline Calibration—The baselines of the Faraday cup amplifiers, that is, the amplifier responses without
incoming ion beam to the cup, shall be measured on a regular basis and checked for stability. During the DS measurements,
baseline measurements are performed on a regular basis. Note that the integration time for the baseline measurement has a
significant influence on the uncertainty of Faraday cup measurements, particularly at lower ion beam intensities. Therefore, the
integration time of the baseline (within a measurement) shall be comparable to the integration time of the actual ion beam signal
integration. The long-term historical baseline data shall be regularly reviewed by the user to assure that the system performance
is within manufacturer specifications and quality system requirements.
12.4 Amplifier Gain Calibration—The stability and response of individual Faraday detector amplifiers shall be measured and
differences between amplifiers corrected for via the amplifier gain calibration. Gain calibration is normally performed by
sequentially applying a stable calibration current to the input of each Faraday cup amplifier and the output is then normalized to
a reference value to generate a gain calibration factor for each amplifier. A gain calibration shall be performed prior to each
automatic DS sequence. Historical gain calibration data can be used to evaluate the stability of the amplifiers.
12.5 Faraday Cup Effıciency Test—The response of individual Faraday cups depends on several factors, for example, extent of
usage, manufacturing variability, and can also be affected by an insufficient electron suppression voltage. The relative response of
the Faraday cups, therefore, shall be determined periodically. Usually, the Faraday cups of a multi-collector system are only
intercalibrated for the current amplifiers connected to them (see 12.4) but not for the differences in the efficiencies of the Faraday
cups themselves. The efficiencies of the Faraday cups are expected to be similar to each other, which means that the relative
efficiencies (relative to one reference cup) are normally close to unity. Note that an (electronic) amplifier gain calibration (see 12.4)
shall be performed prior to the Faraday cup efficiency test. The Faraday cup efficiency test can be performed in several ways, as
described in 12.5.1 – 12.5.4.
12.5.1 The calibration may be performed by switching a stable ion beam of Re (from a blank filament) between each Faraday
cup and a reference Faraday cup. In case a relative efficiency between the detectors is significantly different from unity, this result
can be used to correct for differences in the detector response. This procedure can be performed with a relative uncertainty at the
level of <0.1 %.
C1871 − 22
12.5.2 A series of peak-jumping measurements between all Faraday cups and a reference cup to be checked can also be performed
using a sufficiently large uranium sample and one large stable ion beam, for example, a 10 to 20 V ion beam of U from a LEU
or natural uranium sample. The drift of the signal intensity shall be corrected for using the operating software. This procedure can
be performed with a relative uncertainty at the level of <0.01 %.
12.5.3 A series of comparative neodymium (Nd) isotope amount of ratio measurements can be performed in two different modes
TM
such as the multi-dynamic mode and the static mode with “amplifier rotation” (only for TRITON TIMS, also called “virtual
amplifier”: each Faraday cup is connected to each amplifier for regular time intervals during the measurement). This procedure can
be performed with a relative uncertainty at the level of few ppm (5). It shall be repeated until all Faraday cups of interest for DS
measurements have been included.
12.5.4 A series of static measurements can be performed using special “multi-isotope” reference materials, such as IRMM-3100a
233 235 236 238 233 235 238
( U/ U/ U/ U=1/1/1/1), IRMM-072/1, IRMM-074/1, or IRMM-199 ( U/ U/ U=1/1/1), to include all Faraday cups.
This procedure can be performed with relative uncertainties of about 0.03 %.
12.6 Linearity Test—There are various procedures to check the linearity of an isotope mass spectrometer detection system. The
procedures described in 12.6.1 and 12.6.2 are mainly applicable for Faraday multi-collector systems.
12.6.1 The linearity of the mass spectrometer is determined over the working range of the Faraday cups by measuring the
235 238
U/ U ratios of various reference materials under identical conditions. The mass spectrometer system is linear if the K factor,
235 238 235 238
that is, the ratio of the certified U/ U ratio to the measured U/ U ratio, is independent of the isotopic composition of the
material. For this procedure, the NBL U-series of reference materials (U005a to U970, 0.5 to 97 % of U) is ideal and can be
235 235
combined with the IRMM-183-187 series (0.3 to 5 % of U) and the IRMM 019-029 series (0.17 to 5 % of U, to be converted
from UF ). This procedure shall be performed sequentially for all Faraday cups of the multi-collector system needed for the DS
analyses.
238 235 233 235
12.6.2 The IRMM-072 and IRMM-074 series of reference materials are characterized by U/ U ratios of ≈1 and U/ U
–6
ratios ranging from ≈1 down to ≈10 for the 15 or 10 units, respectively, of the used series. For each unit, the bias of the measured
238 235 233 235
U/ U ratios from the certified ones can be used for internal mass fractionation correction of the measured U/ U ratios.
233 235
The comparison of the corrected U/ U ratios with the certified ones allows the linearity of the detection system to be checked
over a dynamic range of six orders of magnitude for the ion beam intensity. A detailed description of the procedure is given in (14).
This procedure shall be performed sequentially for all Faraday cups needed for the DS analyses.
12.7 Peak Overlap—When a Faraday multi-collector system for the simultaneous detection of several masses is used, it needs to
be ensured that the peak overlap is acceptable. A mass scan, usually by scanning the magnetic field, shall be performed by which
all ion beams are simultaneously moved through the respective cups. The measured intensities for all detectors shall be plotted
versus the mass of a reference detector to make the peak overlap visible. All peaks shall have a symmetric shape with a common
flat region in the center, with the peak centers reasonably close together, as specified by the manufacturer or the user quality system.
After a satisfactory peak overlap is realized (by moving cups relative to one another if necessary), the positions of all detectors
shall be saved, for example, as a Faraday cup configuration file. The positions shall be checked and possibly readjusted, manually
or using stepping motors, as needed before a new automatic measurement sequence.
12.8 Mass Fractionation Correction:
235 238
12.8.1 For the double spike method the mass fractionation correction for the U/ U ratio is performed for each integration step
(called “mass cycle,” see below) internally throughout the measurement rather than externally, by using the mass fractionation
233 236
observed for a double spike material with a known or certified U/ U isotope ratio (also spanning three mass units).
12.8.2 The mass fractionation correction factor, K, is calculated as follows:
K 5~R ⁄ R ! (1)
c m
where:
K = mass fractionation correction factor,
233 236
R = measured U/ U isotope amount ratio for the double spike, and
m
233 236
R = known or certified U/ U isotope amount ratio value for the double spike.
c
C1871 − 22
Details about the mass fractionation and further correction algorithms are presented in 14.2.
13. Procedure
13.1 Sample Preparation:
13.1.1 Sample Dissolution—Dissolve an appropriate sample amount to obtain the desired filament loading solution for the mass
spectrometric analysis. See Practice C1347 for the dissolution of uranium.
13.1.2 Prepare the sample and any reference material solutions as purified nitrates, using identical chemical preparation and
handling steps. For uranium samples hydrolyzed from uranium hexafluoride, it is recommended that the samples are converted to
U O before dissolution in nitric acid and analysis. The solution concentrations shall be chosen to allow for a convenient filament
3 8
loading (for example, a 2-mg U/mL solution yields 2 μg of uranium per μL, see also 13.2).
13.1.3 Sample Purification—Use Practice C1411 or similar procedure to separate uranium from plutonium and other impurities,
if necessary.
13.2 Sample Loading and Conditioning—Samples for the DS method are usually directly loaded on the filament by drop
deposition. Samples and QC materials shall be prepared for analysis by the same method at similar mass loadings. Drop deposition
onto the filament can be accomplished with the use of a microsyringe or pipette fitted with a plastic tip. Change the tip between
sample loadings to prevent cross contamination. In particular for loading and mixing a sample solution and the double spike
solution on the same filament, cross contamination between these solutions has to be prevented by changing pipette tips. It is
recommended to load the double spike solution first and the sample afterwards in order to minimize the risk of contaminating the
double spike solution with any sample material. For filaments loaded by drop deposition, the solution shall be evaporated by
passing sufficient electrical current through the filament to cause gentle drying without boiling. Samples for DS are usually
prepared in a 1 to 5 M nitric acid with a uranium concentration between 1 to 6 mg/g, which is equivalent to 1 to 6 μg/μL. Depending
on the uranium amount to be loaded, more than 1 μL of the sample solution may be needed. The recommended uranium amount
for loading is 4 to 6 μg. Deposit drops very carefully and slowly. It is recommended to keep the filament heated by passing 0.5
to 0.7 A current and depositing 1-μL-drops at a time. After all drops are loaded, the solution on the filament is heated until dryness,
for at least one more minute, and then heated for several seconds at a higher current of 1.5 to 2.0 A for conditioning. Alternatively,
a stepped-heating program can be used to condition samples, that is, to convert samples to suitable chemical forms. Avoid quick
evaporation of the sample or melting the filament. At different facilities, different loading and conditioning procedures have been
established and validated. Each procedure shall be applied in a consistent manner for all samples, and quality control samples.
13.3 Mount all sample filaments and ionization filaments on a sample turret and insert the sample turret into the ion source of the
mass spectrometer.
13.4 Close the source and start evacuating.
13.5 Perform adjustment (also called initialization) of the sample turret if needed. In case of problems with electrical connections,
the source might have to be vented again to resolve the problem.
13.6 Evacuate ion source to the manufacturer’s recommended minimum pressure or according to the user’s procedure.
13.7 Add liquid nitrogen to the cold trap if desired.
13.8 Isotope Amount Ratio Measurement—The following steps 13.8.1 – 13.10 are typically performed automatically under
computer control depending upon the instrument.
13.8.1 Perform an amplifier gain calibration for each new automatic sequence.
13.8.2 Measure the baseline during the course of each measurement of a sample and QC standard.
13.8.3 Usually under computer control, the ionization filament is heated up to a temperature of about 1800 to 1950°C.1950 °C.
For automatic sequences, usually the magnitude of the Re ion beam is used as the regulated quantity instead of the filament
temperature by a pyrometer because only the narrow sides of the filaments are oriented towards the pyrometer. Typical Re ion
C1871 − 22
beams of about 300 to 600 mV (on a 10 Ω resistor) are used for non-zone refined filaments and lower values of 150 to 400 mV
are used for zone-refined filaments, depending on the thickness and brand.
187 187
13.8.4 The Re ion beam is peak centered and focused. If necessary, the Re ion beam size is readjusted towards the target
value, which shall be similar (within about 20 %) for each measurement within an automatic sequence, by changing the filament
current.
235 238
13.8.5 The sample filament is heated to a temperature sufficient to yield and ion beam sum intensity from U and U of about
1 to 4 V (on an amplifier with a 10 Ω resistor). The beam is focused and peak centered using the largest U ion beam, which is
usually the U beam.
13.8.6 Data acquisition is started. The data acquisition is performed on a per block basis in which each block consists of a
minimum of two and a maximum of five mass cycles and each mass cycle of (usually) four integration steps. The data acquisition
is usually continued until the whole sample is evaporated; see 13.10.
13.8.7 DS Mass Cycle—The DS mass cycle consists of four steps as shown in Table 1. Depending on the ion beam intensities
observed the use of amplifiers with 10 Ω resistors is recommended. For the recommended sample-to-spike amount ratios >20,
233 236 12
the U and U intensities coming from the double spike shall be detected using amplifiers with 10 Ω resistors, if available,
in case of depleted samples with low U ion beams this applies as well.
13.8.7.1 The first step is the main integration for all isotopes; the integration time is usually about 16 s.
13.8.7.2 In Steps 2 and 3 of the DS mass cycle, the background intensities at the low and high mass side of all uranium isotopes
235 236
of interest are measured. The mutual backgrounds for U and U are the most critical ones and depend a lot on the sample to
spike ratio. Due to the differences in the tailing effect between the low and high mass sides, an interpolation for the isotope ratios
shall be performed, using a linear approximation.
13.8.7.3 Step 4 is an optional “dummy” step, which might be needed to move the mass setting back to the main cup configuration
(as in step 1) for checking the ion beam signals at the very end of each block. This is needed to determine the ion beam intensity
before the next heating step (see 13.9).
13.9 Interblock Actions and Filament Heating for DS:
13.9.1 Peak Centering and Baseline—Each measurement block usually consists of a maximum of five mass cycles, with each
cycle having a duration of about 60 to 90 s. Before each block, a peak centering is performed using the U isotope. Additionally,
an ion source focusing is performed before each block. Typically, every five blocks, the electronic baselines of all the Faraday cup
amplifiers are re-measured. In case 10 Ω resistors are used in some of the amplifiers, the idle times for the baseline measurements
have to be sufficiently long, for example, at least 15 s.
13.9.2 DS Interblock Heating—The DS interblock heating is recommended to be performed similar to the MTE interblock heating
as described in Test Method C1832. The filament heating is controlled by a special program script executed after each measurement
235 238
block. This program script first measures the actual sum intensity (mainly from U and U) and compares it with the
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...