SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
01-december-2013
Javni prevoz - Interoperabilni sistem vodenja (pre)voznin - 2. del: Poslovne prakse
(ISO/TR 24014-2:2013)
Public transport - Interoperable fare management system - Part 2: Business practices
(ISO/TR 24014-2:2013)
Öffentlicher Verkehr -Interoperables Fahrgeldmanagement - Teil 2: Empfohlene
Verfahren für Regelsatz (ISO/TR 24014-2:2013)
Transport public - Système de gestion tarifaire interopérable - Partie 2: Pratiques
commerciales (ISO/TR 24014-2:2013)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
ICS:
03.220.01 Transport na splošno Transport in general
35.240.60 Uporabniške rešitve IT v IT applications in transport
transportu in trgovini and trade
SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013 en,fr,de
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013


TECHNICAL REPORT
CEN ISO/TR 24014-2

RAPPORT TECHNIQUE

TECHNISCHER BERICHT
August 2013
ICS 03.220.01; 35.240.60
English Version
Public transport - Interoperable fare management system - Part
2: Business practices (ISO/TR 24014-2:2013)
Transport public - Système de gestion tarifaire Öffentlicher Verkehr -Interoperables Fahrgeldmanagement
interopérable - Partie 2: Pratiques commerciales (ISO/TR - Teil 2: Empfohlene Verfahren für Regelsatz (ISO/TR
24014-2:2013) 24014-2:2013)


This Technical Report was approved by CEN on 16 March 2013. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 278.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United
Kingdom.





EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
© 2013 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013: E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013 (E)
Contents Page
Foreword .3
2

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013 (E)
Foreword
This document (CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013) has been prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 204
"Intelligent transport systems" in collaboration with Technical Committee CEN/TC 278 “Intelligent transport
systems” the secretariat of which is held by NEN.
Endorsement notice
The text of ISO/TR 24014-2:2013 has been approved by CEN as CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013 without any
modification.

3

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
TECHNICAL ISO/TR
REPORT 24014-2
First edition
2013-08-15
Public transport — Interoperable fare
management system —
Part 2:
Business practices
Transport public — Système de gestion tarifaire interopérable —
Partie 2: Pratiques commerciales
Reference number
ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)
©
ISO 2013

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT
© ISO 2013
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2013 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)

Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 2
4 Symbols and abbreviated terms . 3
5 Structure of Set of Rules . 3
5.1 Classification of Set of Rules . 3
5.2 A table form of Set of Rules . 3
5.3 Structure of core part of Set of Rules . 4
5.4 Structure of extra part of Set of Rules . 4
5.5 Transforming structure of Set of Rules into business entities . 5
6 Three Dimensional Model in collaboration among functional models .7
6.1 Collaboration among functional models . 7
6.2 Three Dimensional Model . 8
6.3 Three Dimensional Model for IFMS . 9
6.4 Three Dimensional Model for IFMS and non-PT system .11
7 Integration of Set of Rules .13
7.1 Integration of Set of Rules and Interoperable States .13
7.2 Migration Paths to expanding Interoperability .17
Annex A (informative) Example of Set of Rules with Structure .20
Annex B (informative) Classifications of rules in Set of Rules in Part 1 and Part 2 .22
Annex C (informative) European example of multiple functional models collaboration and their
migration paths .24
© ISO 2013 – All rights reserved iii

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International
Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting.
Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies
casting a vote.
In exceptional circumstances, when a technical committee has collected data of a different kind from
that which is normally published as an International Standard (“state of the art”, for example), it may
decide by a simple majority vote of its participating members to publish a Technical Report. A Technical
Report is entirely informative in nature and does not have to be reviewed until the data it provides are
considered to be no longer valid or useful.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO/TR 24014-2 was prepared by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) Technical
Committee CEN/TC 278, Road transport and traffic telematics, in collaboration with Technical Committee
ISO/TC 204, Intelligent transport systems, in accordance with the Agreement on technical cooperation
between ISO and CEN (Vienna Agreement).
This first edition of ISO/TR 24014-2, together with ISO/TR 24014-3:2013 and the future second edition
of ISO 24014-1, will cancel and replace ISO 24014-1:2007.
ISO 24014 consists of the following parts, under the general title Public transport — Interoperable fare
management system:
— Part 1: Architecture
— Part 2: Business practices [Technical Report]
— Part 3: Multi-application media [Technical Report]
iv © ISO 2013 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)

Introduction
ISO 24014-1 defines the reference functional model of an Interoperable Fare Management System
(hereafter IFM functional model). The scope of ISO 24014-1 excludes irrelevant aspects related to
interoperability, particularly organizational and physical implementation.
Among the matters that are outside the scope and not clearly or concretely described in ISO 24014-1, this
Technical Report provides a conceptual framework to guide the integration of such business practices,
which is important when constructing an IFMS compliant with ISO 24014-1
For this purpose, this Technical Report provides a conceptual framework that is described below.
ISO 24014-1 states that a full IFMS is described by its functional model of IFMS and its Set of Rules. Therefore,
Set of Rules is one of the necessary components to understand the full or whole IFMS environment.
However, ISO 24014-1:2007 is limited in description, only addressing Set of Rules in addition to some
security and identification rules specifically stated as “… regulations achieving IFM policies expressed as
technical, commercial, security and legal requirements and standards relevant to only IFMS.”
The objective of this Technical Report then is to aid readers in their understanding of the whole structure
of Set of Rules by concretely clarifying the relationship with IFM functional model.
In the introduction of ISO 24014-1, it is noted that there may be cases where multiple existing IFMSs
work together collaboratively while distributing their functions across the different IFMSs. Specifically,
these cases that consider integrating/distributing functions between existing IFMSs are one of the
most effective ways of implementing and expanding the interoperability of existing IFMSs. However,
there are no concrete descriptions about the interoperability of multiple existing IFMSs, because, from
the viewpoint of ISO 24014-1, multiple existing IFMSs that achieve interoperability are functionally
considered as a single IFMS.
This Technical Report clarifies how interoperability that is realized among multiple existing IFMSs or
expanded to them can be understood from both IFM functional model and Set of Rules viewpoints.
Further, this Technical Report explains how cases of collaboration, in which IFM functional model
and functional model of non public transport applications are involved, can be interpreted from the
viewpoint of IFM functional model.
© ISO 2013 – All rights reserved v

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013

---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
TECHNICAL REPORT ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)
Public transport — Interoperable fare management
system —
Part 2:
Business practices
1 Scope
This Technical Report introduces a generic conceptual framework that can be applied to all Interoperable
Fare Management Systems (hereafter IFMS) compliant with ISO 24014-1, as the basis for business
practices relating to the conceptual framework for an IFMS, which is described in ISO 24014-1.
This generic conceptual framework comprises three parts:
a) structure of Set of Rules;
b) collaboration of functional models;
c) integration of Set of Rules.
A “Structure of Set of Rules” is applied to Set of Rules covering the whole domain of IFMS functionality
in all aspects of a system including
— a structure based upon IFM-roles in the domain of IFM functional model,
— a structure based upon roles, abstract objects performing a set of functions, in all IFM domains, and
— a structure based upon business entities in all IFM domains.
These structures provide a method to easily understand the Structure of Set of Rules as a whole.
Collaboration of functional models is applied when different functional models that collaborate exist,
such as might be defined by the coexistence of applications on a medium, between functional models
of existing IFMS, or between IFM functional model and functional model of a non-PT system. Such
relationships are best explained and understood from the viewpoint of a three-dimensional model as
defined in Clause 6.
“Integration of Set of Rules” is applied to clarify the extent of interoperability that may exist between
existing IFMSs which are collaborating by quantifying the integration of Set of Rules based upon
“Structure of Set of Rules”.
This Technical Report is used as a tool for business practices. Any organizational references and concrete
descriptions in examples within this Technical Report are purely informative.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced
document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 24014-1, Public transport — Interoperable fare management system — Part 1: Architecture
© ISO 2013 – All rights reserved 1

---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)

3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 24014-1 and the following apply.
3.1
core part of set of rules
rules relating to only IFM-roles and the use cases defined in ISO 24014-1, which defines the functions of
a fare management system relating to interoperability
3.2
extra part of set of rules
rules including IFM-partners/IFM-silent-partners and other use cases except use cases defined in
ISO 24014-1, which work to decide serviceability of an IFMS and do not affect interoperability of the system
3.3
full IFM functional model
functional model played by all IFM-roles and IFM-partners
Note 1 to entry: See 6.1 for the relationship among full IFM functional model, extra IFM functional model and IFM
functional model.
3.4
extra IFM functional model
difference between full IFM functional model and IFM functional model
3.5
IFM functional model
functional model defined in ISO 24014-1
3.6
IFM-partner
role resides in the outside of IFM functional model, and performs a set of interactive fumctions in a
functional model/use cases
3.7
IFM-role
role within the IFM
Note 1 to entry: Corresponds to the definition of “entity” in ISO 24014-1:2007.
3.8
IFM-silent-partner
role resides in the outside of IFM functional model, and does not perform a set of interactive functions
in a functional model/use cases
3.9
management IFM-role
IFM-role played by security manager and registrar for administrating IFMs
3.10
non-PT-role
role within non-public transport systems
3.11
operational IFM-role
IFM-role played by product owner, product retailer, application retailer, collection and forwarding,
service operator, application owner, customer service, and customer related to PT daily operation
3.12
serviceability
level of functionality of a fare management system apart from interoperability such as kinds of payment
means, kinds of medium, methods of acquiring medium
2 © ISO 2013 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 14 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)

4 Symbols and abbreviated terms
IFMSs Interoperable Fare Management Systems
PT Public Transport
5 Structure of Set of Rules
5.1 Classification of Set of Rules
Set of Rules is defined in ISO 24014-1:2007 as “regulations achieving IFM policies expressed as technical,
commercial, security and legal requirements and standards relevant to only IFMS”. IFM Policy described
by Set of Rules defines all the functionality of IFMS, and thus all the conditions necessary for constructing
IFMS can be understood through Structure of Set of Rules. Therefore, the concept of Structure of Set
of Rules gives PT stakeholders a guideline from which to draw the whole picture of IFMS, currently
configured or as planned, compliant with ISO 24014-1.
Core part of Set of Rules is the subset of Set of Rules, which defines functions related to interoperability in a
functional IFMS. From the viewpoint of existing IFMSs, the structure of core part of Set of Rules is a useful
concept when integration or distribution of core part of Set of Rules is done to realize interoperability
among existing fare management systems. (See Clause 7 and ISO 24014-1:2007, Annex B, Figure B.4.)
Extra part of Set of Rules, also a subset of Set of Rules, is outside of the core part of Set of Rules. It defines
the contents of each element related to serviceability, such as payment options and accepted media.
From the viewpoint of multiple functional model collaboration, which is introduced in 6.1 for functional
models outside public transport area, the structure of extra part of Set of Rules is a necessary concept
for harmonization of services in collaboration with multiple functional models.
5.2 A table form of Set of Rules
In order to clearly show the structure of Set of Rules, a table form is proposed as a way of describing Set
of Rules. In Figure 1, the columns represent the IFM-roles and the rows represent the Use Cases defined
in ISO 24014-1. Based upon IFM-roles and the Use Cases, and by properties of rules, each rule can be
identified, defined and related. The following table form represents Structure of Set of Rules with three
characteristics of each rule: related Use Cases, related roles and related properties.
Figure 1 — Concept model of table form of Set of Rules
© ISO 2013 – All rights reserved 3

---------------------- Page: 15 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)

In ISO 24014-1, the following definitions are included:
— Pricing Rules: rules defining the price and payment relationships to the customer.
— Commercial Rules: rules defining the settlement and commission within the IFMS.
The description of a structure of Set of Rules in the table form makes it possible to easily relate specific
rules to IFM-roles and vice versa. For example, if IFM-roles are selected, rules that should be applied to
relevant IFM-roles can be known. If rules are sorted out by transit properties such as being related to
pricing, commercial, regulatory or others, all the relevant rules can be systematically known, which are
required by implementing transit properties.
The description of the structure of Set of Rules in the table form does not mean simply grouping of rules,
but showing a process of making rules in compliance with IFM functional model. Rules identify which
IFM-roles are subject to the rules and how such IFM-roles are related to each other. The structure of Set
of Rules gives a guide to making a real Set of Rules to PT stakeholders, and helps them to understand
an IFMS through analysing the existing Set of Rules. The structure of Set of Rules is a tool to aid in the
process of relating rules with roles.
5.3 Structure of core part of Set of Rules
IFM-roles and Use Cases necessary for making core part of Set of Rules are given by ISO 24014-1. As
explained in 5.2, in the concept model of the table form of core part of Set of Rules (see Figure 1), from the
viewpoint of each rule, the columns are IFM-roles that are governed by appropriate rules, and the rows are
the Use Cases to which the rule is applied. The cross points contain individual rules that are subdivided
into the properties of the rules, such as, pricing, commercial, regulatory, technical, privacy, and trust.
A generic table for applying core part of Set of Rules when used as a template is expanded as shown in
Figure 2. In this generic table, a row representing an instance of the Use Cases is subdivided into its
properties. At the cross points of the columns and the rows, concrete rules are described, relating Use
Cases defined in ISO 24014-1 and IFM-roles specific to a property category.
Figure 2 — Generic table form of Set of Rules
As guidance for actually making a table form of core part of Set of Rules, a table form addressing Use
Cases of Product is described in Annex A.
5.4 Structure of extra part of Set of Rules
Roles which are outside IFMS Functional model, even if they have functions relating to IFMS, are not
described in ISO 24014-1, because from the interoperability point of view of functional IFMS, they need
not be considered. However, these roles have to be considered from serviceability point of view.
These roles are categorized by attributes into two types. One is a role which has an interactive relationship
with IFM-roles and becomes an Actor in Use Cases defined in ISO 24014-1. This role actively performs a
4 © ISO 2013 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 16 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)

set of functions of implementing serviceability of an IFMS in cooperation with IFM-roles, and if necessary
in collaboration with roles outside the IFMS. This is called IFM-partner. Full IFM functional model, the
functional model including serviceability, which defines functions of IFM apart from interoperability, is
described as interactive relationships among IFM-roles and IFM-partners.
The other is a role which must obey rules created by interactive relationships among IFM-roles and IFM-
partners. Therefore, the role is a party governed by Set of Rules, but is not a player in full IFM functional
model. This is called IFM-silent-partner.
As IFM-partners and IFM-silent-partners are also roles as well as being characterized by their IFM-roles,
the description of the structure of extra part of Set of Rules should be designed in a similar form to the
structure of core part of Set of Rules. The table form is expanded from core part of Set of Rules with
addition of columns of IFM-partners/IFM-silent-partners. This table presents Set of Rules for the whole
IFM functions. In this table, relationships about serviceability applied to non-PT systems can be contained.
The table form of Set of Rules expanded into the whole IFMS functionality is given in Figure 3. Additional
use cases may be required depending on the IFMS functionality.
Figure 3 — Extension of table form with IFM-partners/IFM-silent-partners
5.5 Transforming structure of Set of Rules into business entities
In an existing IFMS, objects responsible for rules are not roles but are business entities within real
organizations. To make the table form of Set of Rules a practical guideline to construct an IFMS, a
transformation from roles to business entities should be provided.
Figure 4 explains a way of transforming a table from roles to business entities. The following should be
noted when the table form of Set of Rules with business entities is created.
— One role may correspond to multiple business entities and one business entity may correspond to
multiple roles.
— The correspondence between roles and business entities may be different from Use Case to Use
Case. Therefore, this correspondence table may be specific for each Use Case.
— Each allocation of roles to business entities may differ from one existing IFMS to another.
© ISO 2013 – All rights reserved 5

---------------------- Page: 17 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)

Figure 4 — Transformation table from functional to business entities
According to this concept, Figure 5 is created as the table form of the whole Set of Rules, including core
part and extra part, by applying correspondence of business entities with roles. The table form of the
whole Set of Rules useful for business practice can be obtained after filling out the table in Figure 5 for
all the Use Cases.
By sorting the rules of all the tables shown in Figure 5, in relation to a specific business entity, there will
be a subset of Set of Rules by which each entity is governed. This will be done for each business entity.
By sorting rules according to the property of rules, such as Pricing, Commercial, etc., the subset of Set of
Rules required to implement policies which relate to each property can be systematically determined.
Figure 5 — Transforming into a final form
6 © ISO 2013 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 18 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 24014-2:2013
ISO/TR 24014-2:2013(E)

6 Three Dimensional Model in collaboration among functional models
6.1 Collaboration among functional models
For expanding interoperability, there are cases where multiple existing IFMSs work together by
integrating/distributing the functions within them, such as:
— multiple applications (PT applications) are loaded on a single medium;
— existing IFMSs make own Products (PT products) usable on Applications of other existing IFMSs.
In these cases, there are collaborations between corresponding functional models of existing IFMSs for
related applications.
When IFMS Applications and non-PT applications are loaded on a single medium, there may be cases
where the related applications jointly achieve some serviceability. Even in these cases, there are
collaborations between full IFM functional model and the corresponding functional model for non-PT
applications.
The situations described above are called multiple functional models collaboration.
Multiple functional model collaboration is an effective way to realize and improve both interoperability
and serviceability. At the same time, this kind of collaboration can take any form of patterns. And in
case of non-PT functional models, the domains where collaborations can happen between the full IFM
functional model and non-PT functional model may differ depending upon the corresponding to a set of
functional models. Therefore, a tool to understand in a general way these kinds of collaborations is very
useful in addressing business practices.
NOTE The domain for the structure of Set of Rules, which is the whole IFMS domain, and the domain for
full IFM functional model do not necessarily coincide. As described in 5.4, in the former domain, IFM-roles, IFM-
partners, and IFM-silent-partner are involved parties. In the latter domain, only IFM-roles and IFM-partners are
involved (See Figure 6).
© ISO 2013 – All rights reserved 7

---------------------- Page: 19 ----------------------

SIST-TP CEN ISO/TR 240
...