iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
SIST

SIST EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016

(Amendment)

Sensory analysis - Methodology - Paired comparison test (ISO 5495:2005/Amd 1:2016)

Sensory analysis - Methodology - Paired comparison test (ISO 5495:2005/Amd 1:2016)

This International Standard describes a procedure for determining whether there exists a perceptible sensory difference or a similarity between samples of two products concerning the intensity of a sensory attribute. This test is sometimes also referred to as a directional difference test or a 2-AFC test (Alternative Forced Choice). In fact, the paired comparison test is a forced choice test between two alternatives. The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several, which means that it enables determination of whether there exists a perceptible difference concerning a given attribute, and the specification of the direction of difference, but it does not give any indication of the extent of that difference. The absence of difference for the attribute under study does not signify that there does not exist any difference between the two products.

Sensorische Analyse - Prüfverfahren - Paarweise Vergleichsprüfung (ISO 5495:2005/Amd 1:2016)

Analyse sensorielle - Méthodologie - Essai de comparaison par paires (ISO 5495:2005/Amd 1:2016)

Senzorična analiza - Metodologija - Preskus s primerjavo v parih (ISO 5495:2005/Amd 1:2016)

Ta mednarodni standard opisuje postopek za ugotavljanje, ali obstaja zaznavna senzorična razlika oz. podobnost med vzorci dveh izdelkov v smislu intenzitete senzorične lastnosti. Ta preskus se včasih imenuje tudi preskus usmerjene razlike ali preskus 2-AFC (metoda prisilne izbire). Preskus s primerjavo v parih je pravzaprav preskus z uporabo metode prisilne izbire med dvema alternativama. Metoda se lahko uporablja, če obstaja razlika v eni ali več senzorskih lastnostih; to pomeni, da je mogoče ugotoviti, ali obstaja zaznavna razlika, ki zadeva podano lastnost, ter določiti smer razlike, pri čemer podatek o obsegu razlike ni na voljo. Odsotnost razlike za lastnost, ki se preučuje, ne pomeni, da med izdelkoma ne obstaja nobena razlika.

General Information

Status
Published
Public Enquiry End Date
24-May-2015
Publication Date
10-Apr-2016
ICS
67.240 - Sensory analysis
Technical Committee
KŽP - Agricultural food products
Current Stage
6060 - National Implementation/Publication (Adopted Project)
Start Date
24-Mar-2016
Due Date
29-May-2016
Completion Date
11-Apr-2016
Ref Project
EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016 - Sensory analysis - Methodology - Paired comparison test (ISO 5495:2005/Amd 1:2016)

Relations

Amends
SIST EN ISO 5495:2007 - Sensory analysis - Methodology - Paired comparison test (ISO 5495:2005 and ISO 5495:2005/Cor 1:2006)
Effective Date
01-May-2015

Buy Standard

EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016
PreviousNext
Amendment
EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016
English language
8 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016
01-maj-2016
6HQ]RULþQDDQDOL]D0HWRGRORJLMD3UHVNXVVSULPHUMDYRYSDULK ,62
$PG
Sensory analysis - Methodology - Paired comparison test (ISO 5495:2005/Amd 1:2016)
Sensorische Analyse - Prüfverfahren - Paarweise Vergleichsprüfung (ISO
5495:2005/Amd 1:2016)
Analyse sensorielle - Méthodologie - Essai de comparaison par paires (ISO
5495:2005/Amd 1:2016)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016
ICS:
67.240 6HQ]RULþQDDQDOL]D Sensory analysis
SIST EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016 en
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016


EN ISO 5495:2007/A1
EUROPEAN STANDARD

NORME EUROPÉENNE

March 2016
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 67.240
English Version

Sensory analysis - Methodology - Paired comparison test
(ISO 5495:2005/Amd 1:2016)
Analyse sensorielle - Méthodologie - Essai de Sensorische Analyse - Prüfverfahren - Paarweise
comparaison par paires (ISO 5495:2005/Amd 1:2016) Vergleichsprüfung (ISO 5495:2005/Amd 1:2016)
This amendment A1 modifies the European Standard EN ISO 5495:2007; it was approved by CEN on 15 January 2016.

CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for inclusion of
this amendment into the relevant national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.

This amendment exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation
under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has the
same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and
United Kingdom.





EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
© 2016 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016
EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016 (E)
Contents Page
European foreword . 3

2

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016
EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016 (E)
European foreword
This document (EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016) has been prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 34
“Food products”.
This Amendment to the European Standard EN ISO 5495:2007 shall be given the status of a national
standard, either by publication of an identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by September 2016,
and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn at the latest by September 2016.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent
rights.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,
France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey and the United Kingdom.
Endorsement notice
The text of ISO 5495:2005/Amd 1 2016 has been approved by CEN as EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016
without any modification.
3

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 5495:2007/A1:2016
INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 5495
Third edition
2005-11-15
AMENDMENT 1
2016-02-15
Sensory analysis — Methodology —
Paired comparison test
AMENDMENT 1
Analyse sensorielle — Méthodologie — Essai de comparaison par
paires
AMENDEMENT 1
Reference number
ISO 5495:2005/Amd.1:2016(E)
©
ISO 2016

--------
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

SIST
SIST EN ISO 8586:2023(Main)
Sensory analysis - Selection and training of sensory assessors (ISO 8586:2023)
EN ISO 8586:2023

This document specifies criteria for the selection of and procedures for the training of trained sensory assessors and expert sensory assessors for food and beverages, as well as home and personal care products.
It is applicable to all industries concerned with the evaluation of products by the sense organs.
This document supplements the information given in ISO 6658.

  • Standard
    48 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN ISO 11132:2021(Main)
Sensory analysis - Methodology - Guidelines for the measurement of the performance of a quantitative descriptive sensory panel (ISO 11132:2021)
EN ISO 11132:2021

This document gives guidelines for assessing the overall performance of a quantitative descriptive
panel and the performance of each panel member.
This document is applicable to the validation of the training of individual assessors or panels, as well as
to the performance monitoring of established panels.
This document does not apply to the panel performance for descriptive methods where the individual
scores of each assessor are not recorded, where there is no single list of attributes that is common to all
the assessors, or where dominance rather than intensity is measured. Consequently, the performance
of descriptive panels using methods such as consensus profile, free-choice profile, flash profile and
temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) are out of scope.
The methods specified in this document are for monitoring and assessing the ability of a panel and its
assessors to discriminate between products, the agreement between assessors of the same panel and
the repeatability of these assessors in their intensity scoring.
Reproducibility, including both the comparison between panels and the comparison within the same
panel of several evaluations conducted under different conditions (i.e. separated in time), is out of scope
of this document.
The methods specified in this document can be used, in full or a selection only, by the panel leader to
appraise continuously the performance of panels or individual assessors. The methods listed are not
exhaustive and other appropriate methods can also be used.

  • Standard
    31 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN ISO 4120:2021(Main)
Sensory analysis - Methodology - Triangle test (ISO 4120:2021)
EN ISO 4120:2021

This document specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or
similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The
method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.
The method is statistically more efficient than the duo-trio test (described in ISO 10399), but has
limited use with products that exhibit strong carryover and/or lingering flavours.
The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown [i.e. it determines neither
the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attribute(s)
responsible for the difference]. The method is applicable only if the products are homogeneous.
The method is effective for:
a) determining that:
1) either a perceptible difference results (triangle testing for difference);
2) a perceptible difference does not result (triangle testing for similarity),
when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage;
b) selecting, training and monitoring assessors.

  • Standard
    24 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST ISO 11036:2020(Main)
Sensory analysis -- Methodology -- Texture profile
ISO 11036:2020

This document specifies a method for developing a texture profile of food products (solids, semi-solids, liquids) or non-food products (e.g. cosmetics).
This method is one approach to sensory texture profile analysis and other methods exist. This method describes various steps in the process of establishing a complete description of the textural attributes of a product.
This method is applicable to:
— screening and training assessors;
— orientating assessors through the development of definitions and evaluation techniques for textural characteristics;
— characterizing the textural attributes of a product in order to establish its standard profile and to discern any later changes;
— improving old products and developing new products;
— studying various factors that can affect the textural attributes of a product, e.g. changes in process, time, temperature, ingredients, packaging or shelf-life, and storage conditions;
— comparing a product with another similar product to determine the nature and intensity of textural differences;
— correlating sensory and instrumental and/or physical measurements.

  • Standard
    22 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
  • Standard
    17 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    17 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    18 pages
    French language
    sale 15% off
SIST
SIST EN ISO 11136:2017/A1:2020(Amendment)
Sensory analysis - Methodology - General guidance for conducting hedonic tests with consumers in a controlled area - Amendment 1 (ISO 11136:2014/Amd 1:2020)
EN ISO 11136:2017/A1:2020
  • Amendment
    13 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST ISO 5496:2011/A1:2018(Amendment)
Sensory analysis — Methodology — Initiation and training of assessors in the detection and recognition of odours (ISO 5496:2006/Amd 1:2018)
ISO 5496:2006/Amd 1:2018
  • Standard
    2 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    2 pages
    French language
    sale 15% off
  • Amendment
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST ISO 8588:2018
Sensory analysis -- Methodology -- "A" - "not A" test
ISO 8588:2017

This document specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference exists
between samples of two products. The method applies whether a difference exists in a single sensory
attribute or in several.
The “A” – “not A” test can be used in sensory analysis in the following ways:
a) as a difference test, particularly for evaluating samples having variations, for example, in
appearance (making it difficult to obtain strictly identical repeat samples) or in aftertaste (making
direct comparison difficult);
b) as a recognition test, particularly for determining whether an assessor or group of assessors
identifies a new stimulus in relation to a known stimulus (for example, recognition of the quality of
the sweet taste of a new sweetener);
c) as a perception test, to determine the ability of an assessor to discriminate stimuli.
The “A” – “not A” test is not appropriate for assessing if two products are sufficiently similar to be used
interchangeably (i.e. for similarity testing) because the “A” – “not A” test inherently involves replicate
evaluations of the same products by all assessors. These replicate evaluations violate the basic
assumptions for similarity tests to be statistically valid.
Examples of its application are given in Annex B.
NOTE Bi and Ennis[1] point out that the estimate of the discriminal distance, d’, between the “A” and “not
A” samples is the same regardless of the nature of the replicated evaluations performed in the test but that the
estimate of the variance of d’ does depend on how the replicate evaluations were performed. As such, no general
discussion of a Thurstonian analysis of the “A” – “not A” method, nor of the power of the test is undertaken in this
document. Interested readers are referred to Reference [1] for a detailed discussion of the topic.

  • Standard
    17 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
  • Standard
    13 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    13 pages
    French language
    sale 15% off
SIST
SIST ISO 6658:2018
Sensory analysis -- Methodology -- General guidance
ISO 6658:2017

This document gives general guidance on the use of sensory analysis. It describes tests for the
examination of foods and other products by sensory analysis, and includes some general information
on the techniques to be used if statistical analysis of the results is required.
Generally these tests are intended only for objective sensory analysis. However, if a test can be used for
determining preference in hedonic test, this is indicated.
A hedonic test aims to determine the acceptability of the products and/or to determine preferences
among two or more products by the specified consumer population. The methods are effective for
determining whether a perceptible preference exists (difference in degree of liking), or whether no
perceptible preference exists (paired similarity test). General guidance for hedonic tests is given in
ISO 11136.

  • Standard
    32 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
  • Standard
    26 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    27 pages
    French language
    sale 15% off
SIST
SIST EN ISO 10399:2018(Main)
Sensory analysis - Methodology - Duo-trio test (ISO 10399:2017)
EN ISO 10399:2018

This document specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or
similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The
method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.
The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test (described in ISO 4120) but is easier to
perform by the assessors.
The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither
the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attribute(s)
responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.
The method is effective for
a) determining that
1) either a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference), or
2) a perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a
change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage, and
b) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.
Two forms of the method are described:
— the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample
from regular production);
— the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.

  • Standard
    28 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN ISO 11136:2017(Main)
Sensory analysis - Methodology - General guidance for conducting hedonic tests with consumers in a controlled area (ISO 11136:2014)
EN ISO 11136:2017

ISO 11136:2014 describes approaches for measuring, within a controlled area, the degree to which consumers like or relatively like products.
It uses tests based on collecting consumers' responses to questions, generally on paper or via a keyboard or a touch screen. Tests of a behavioural nature (such as recording quantities consumed ad libitum by the consumers) do not fall within the scope of ISO 11136:2014.

  • Standard
    52 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day