Abstract

The measurements are intended to characterize the system equalizer in the presence of selective fading and may also be performed on systems without adaptive equalizers.

Status
Published
Publication Date
30-Sep-2002
Current Stage
6060 - National Implementation/Publication (Adopted Project)
Start Date
01-Oct-2002
Due Date
01-Oct-2002
Completion Date
01-Oct-2002

Buy Documents

Standard

SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002

English language (21 pages)
Preview
Preview
e-Library read for
×1 day

SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 is the Slovenian adoption of IEC 60835-2-8:1993, published by SIST for digital microwave radio transmission systems. It specifies measurement methods for adaptive equalizers in terrestrial radio-relay systems, so engineers can assess how the system behaves under selective fading and compare results in a consistent way.

What does SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 specify?

SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 specifies measurement methods for adaptive equalizers used in digital microwave radio-relay systems, and it also applies to systems without adaptive equalizers. The measurements are aimed at characterizing the complete system under selective fading, not an isolated equalizer.

The document is organized as follows:

  • Clause 1 - Scope
  • Clause 2 - General
  • Clause 3 - Outage signature
  • Clause 4 - Return signature
  • Clause 5 - Measurement of dynamic fading effects
  • Clause 6 - Recovery time
  • Clause 7 - Additional measurements
  • Annex A - Bibliography

Clause 2 introduces the equalizer types and the signature concept used to evaluate selective fading. Clauses 3 and 4 define the main signature measurements, Clause 6 covers recovery time after interruption, and Clause 7 adds related checks for flat fading and adjacent-channel interference.

What are the key requirements of SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002?

SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 measures system behaviour with a two-path simulator and reports the results as signatures or recovery times. In practice, the key requirement is to test the radio-relay link under controlled selective fading conditions and record how the system crosses the defined criteria.

How Clause 2 frames the measurements

Clause 2 explains that multipath propagation can create both attenuation and distortion, which is especially important for high-capacity QAM systems. The standard distinguishes between frequency-domain equalizers and time-domain equalizers, because they respond differently to the same channel distortion.

A frequency-domain equalizer mainly corrects the received power spectrum. In practice, that means it can reduce attenuation distortion, but it does not fully reveal phase or group-delay problems unless the channel is minimum-phase. A time-domain equalizer aims to produce an ISI-free pulse at the decision circuit, so it is the better tool when the channel distortion includes strong intersymbol interference.

Clause 2.3 also states that the measurements are made on the system as a whole. That matters because real outages are caused by the interaction of the radio channel, the equalizer, and the rest of the receiver chain.

What outage signature means in Clause 3

Clause 3 defines the outage signature as the set of notch offset-frequency and notch depth pairs where the system reaches outage. Outage can mean that the BER reaches the limit BERL, or that the BER detector changes to AIS or Sync-loss.

The standard requires separate consideration of:

  • minimum-phase (MP) conditions, where the direct ray is the desired signal
  • non-minimum-phase (NMP) conditions, where the stronger echo can become the desired signal

That distinction matters because equalizers may behave very differently in MP and NMP cases. For testing, the document uses a two-path simulator, a BER detector, and a pseudo-random binary sequence generator. Results are presented as a diagram of notch depth versus notch offset-frequency, which lets users see the fading tolerance of the system.

Clause 3.4 says the detailed equipment specification should state the main system data, the signature mask or minimum notch depth, the connection ports for the simulator, BERL, the two-path delay difference, the simulation type, the equalizer type, the test signal, and the notch-frequency tuning range. In practice, these are the items a test plan or acceptance specification must fix before measurements start.

What return signature adds in Clause 4

Clause 4 defines the return signature as the point where the system recovers as two-path distortion decreases. It is the counterpart to the outage signature and shows how the system behaves after severe fading has already pushed it into a bad state.

This matters because a system can recover along a different path from the one by which it failed. The standard allows measurement methods that either increase notch depth at fixed notch offset-frequency or vary notch offset-frequency at fixed notch depth, depending on the shape of the signature. The result is again presented as a signature curve.

What Clause 5 and Clause 6 are for

Clause 5, Measurement of dynamic fading effects, is listed but not developed in the document body. Clause 6 covers recovery time, which is the interval from reconnection after interruption to the moment the output signal reaches the return criteria.

That timing tells a buyer or test engineer how quickly the system returns to normal operation after sudden channel improvement. The measurement uses an R.F. switch, a two-path simulator, a control unit, and a time interval meter. Clause 6.4 requires the specification to state the simulator parameters used, the maximum permitted recovery time, the main system data, the ports, BERL, the two-path delay difference, the MP or NMP simulation type, the equalizer type, and the test signal.

What Clause 7 adds

Clause 7 adds two practical checks:

  • outage signature with flat fading
  • outage signature with interfering adjacent channels

These measurements are useful because flat fading and selective fading can occur together, and adjacent-channel coupling can worsen outage probability. For system qualification, they help show whether the radio-relay link remains stable when real deployment conditions are less ideal than the nominal receiver input level.

What terms does SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 define?

  • Bit error ratio limit (BERL) - the BER threshold used to decide when the system has reached outage or return conditions.
  • Alarm indication signal (AIS) - a detector status used in the document as one of the outage or return indications.
  • Sync-loss - a detector status showing loss of synchronization, also used as an outage or return indication.
  • Minimum phase (MP) - a channel situation where the direct ray is the desired signal and the weaker echo is the distorting component.
  • Non-minimum phase (NMP) - a channel situation where the stronger echo acts as the desired signal and the direct ray is the distorting component.
  • Outage signature - the locus of notch offset-frequency and notch depth pairs at which the outage criterion is reached.
  • Return signature - the locus of notch offset-frequency and notch depth pairs at which the return criterion is reached.
  • Recovery time - the time from reconnection after interruption to the moment the device under test reaches the return criteria.

Who uses SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002?

SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 is used by radio-relay equipment manufacturers, test laboratories, network operators, and engineers responsible for microwave transmission systems. Quality managers and buyers use it when they need a common test method for comparing equipment under selective fading.

It is especially relevant for teams that design, verify, or accept digital microwave radio systems with adaptive equalizers. The practical tasks include setting up two-path fading tests, measuring BER-based signatures, checking recovery after interruptions, and documenting the equalizer’s behaviour in MP and NMP conditions.

Which standards are used with SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002?

SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 builds on IEC 835-2-4, which provides the basic signature definition and the related two-path framework used throughout this section. Annex A also cites CCIR Report 784-2 for propagation background, along with other technical references on data communication and multipath channel modelling.

What does the SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 document contain?

The document contains a foreword, seven clauses, nine figures, and an informative bibliography in Annex A. The figures show the main technical setups and examples used to interpret results, including linear distortion in QAM, a baseband equalizer, the signature measurement arrangement, outage and return signature examples, and the recovery-time setup.

Clause 3 and Clause 4 also describe how to present results in diagrams, and they include the formulas or definitions behind the notation for relative echo amplitude and notch depth. Figure 9 explains the timing logic for recovery time, including the normal and alarm conditions used during the measurement.

Relations

Effective Date
03-Feb-2026
Effective Date
03-Feb-2026
Effective Date
03-Feb-2026
Effective Date
03-Feb-2026
Effective Date
21-Sep-2010

Buy Documents

Standard

SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002

English language (21 pages)
Preview
Preview
e-Library read for
×1 day

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

ANCE

Mexican certification and testing association.

EMA Mexico Verified

Intertek Slovenia

Intertek testing, inspection, and certification services in Slovenia.

UKAS Slovenia Verified

LNE (Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d'Essais)

French national laboratory for metrology and testing.

COFRAC France Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 is a standard published by the Slovenian Institute for Standardization (SIST). Its full title is "Methods of measurement for equipment used in digital microwave radio transmission systems -- Part 2: Measurements on terrestrial radio-relay systems -- Section 8: Adaptive equalizer". This standard covers: The measurements are intended to characterize the system equalizer in the presence of selective fading and may also be performed on systems without adaptive equalizers.

The measurements are intended to characterize the system equalizer in the presence of selective fading and may also be performed on systems without adaptive equalizers.

SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 33.060.30 - Radio relay and fixed satellite communications systems. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to SIST EN 60835-2-11:2002, SIST EN 60835-2-4:2002, SIST EN 60835-2-7:2002, SIST EN 60835-2-10:2002, SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002/A1:2002. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

SIST EN 60835-2-8:2002 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-oktober-2002
Methods of measurement for equipment used in digital microwave radio
transmission systems - Part 2: Measurements on terrestrial radio-relay systems -
Section 8: Adaptive equalizer (IEC 60835-2-8:1993)
Methods of measurement for equipment used in digital microwave radio transmission
systems -- Part 2: Measurements on terrestrial radio-relay systems -- Section 8: Adaptive
equalizer
Meßverfahren für Geräte in digitalen Mikrowellen-Funkübertragungssystemen -- Teil 2:
Messungen an terrestrischen Richtfunksystemen -- Hauptabschnitt 8: Adaptative
Entzerrer
Méthodes de mesure applicables au matériel utilisé pour les systèmes de transmission
numérique en hyperfréquence -- Partie 2: Mesures applicables aux faisceaux hertziens
terrestres -- Section 8: Egaliseur auto-adaptatif
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 60835-2-8:1993
ICS:
33.060.30 Radiorelejni in fiksni satelitski Radio relay and fixed satellite
komunikacijski sistemi communications systems
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

NORME CEI
INTERNATIONALE IEC
60835-2-8
INTERNATIONAL
Première édition
STAN DARD
First edition
1993-05
Méthodes de mesure applicables au matériel
utilisé pour les systèmes de transmission
numérique en hyperfréquence
Partie 2:
Mesures applicables aux faisceaux hertziens
terrestres
Section 8: Egaliseur auto-adaptatif
Methods of measurement for equipment used in
digital microwave radio transmission systems
Part 2:
Measurements on terrestrial radio-relay systems
Section 8: Adaptive equalizer
© IEC 1993 Droits de reproduction réservés — Copyright - all rights reserved
Aucune partie de cette publication ne peut être reproduite ni No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in
sous
utilisée quelque forme que ce soit et par aucun any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
procédé, électronique ou mécanique, y compris la photo- including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in
copie et les microfilms, sans l'accord écrit de l'éditeur. writing from the publisher.
International Electrotechnical Commission 3, rue de Varembé Geneva, Switzerland
Telefax: +41 22 919 0300 e-mail: inmail@iec.ch IEC web site http: //www.iec.ch
CODE PRIX
Commission Electrotechnique Internationale
PRICE CODE
International Electrotechnical Commission
IEC McHSayHapogHan 3neKTpoTexHH4ecNafl HoMHCCHA
Pour prix, voir catalogue en vigueur
• •
For price, see current catalogue

835-2-8 © IEC:1993 — 3 —
CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD 7
Clause
1 Scope 9
2 General 9
2.1 Frequency domain equalizer 11
2.2 Time domain equalizer 11
2.3 Evaluation of system parameters influenced by the equalizers 13
3 Outage signature 15
3.1 Definition and general considerations 15
3.2 Measurement method 17
3.3 Presentation of results 19
3.4 Details to be specified 19
4 Return signature 19
4.1 Definition and general considerations 19
4.2 Measurement method 21
4.3 Presentation of results 21
4.4 Details to be specified 21
5 Measurement of dynamic fading effects 23
6 Recovery time 23
6.1 Definition and general considerations 23
6.2 Measurement method 23
6.3 Presentation of results 25
6.4 Details to be specified 25
7 Additional measurements 25
7.1 Outage signature with flat fading 25
7.2 Outage signature with interfering adjacent channels 25

835-2-8 © IEC:1993 – 5 –
Page
Figures
1 Linear distortion and crosstalk in a QAM system caused by multipath fading 27
2 Block diagram of a linear baseband equalizer 27
3 Basic arrangement for the measurement of signatures 29
4 Example of an outage signature 29
5 Example of an outage signature with possible unusual signature values 31
6 Presentation of the signature, minimum phase and non-minimum phase, on the same
ordinate scale 31
7 Example of the return signature 33
8 Arrangement for the measurement of recovery time 33
9 a) Bit sequence illustrating the definition of recovery time 35
b) Designation of normal alarm
and conditions 35
Annex A – Bibliography 37
835-2-8 © IEC:1993 – 7 –
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION
METHODS OF MEASUREMENT FOR EQUIPMENT
USED IN DIGITAL MICROWAVE RADIO
TRANSMISSIONS SYSTEMS
Part 2: Measurements on terrestrial radio-relay systems
Section 8: Adaptive equalizer
FOREWORD
1)
The IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) is a worldwide organization for standardization
comprising all national electrotechnical committees (IEC National Committees). The object of the IEC is to
promote international cooperation on all questions concerning standardization in the electrical and
electronic fields. To this end and in addition to other activities, the IEC publishes International Standards.
Their preparation is entrusted to technical committees; any IEC National Committee interested in
the subject dealt with may participate in this preparatory work. International, governmental and
non-governmental organizations liaising with the IEC also participate in this preparation. The IEC
collaborates closely with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in accordance with
conditions determined by agreement between the two organizations.
2)
The formal decisions or agreements of the IEC on technical matters, prepared by technical committees on
which
all the National Committees having a special interest therein are represented, express, as nearly as
possible, an international consensus of opinion on the subjects dealt with.
3)
They have the form of recommendations for international use published in the form of standards, technical
reports or guides and they are accepted by the National Committees in that sense.
4)
In order to promote international unification, IEC National Committees undertake to apply IEC International
Standards transparently to the maximum extent possible in their national and regional standards. Any
divergence between the IEC Standard and the corresponding national or regional standard shall be clearly
indicated in the latter.
This section of the International Standard IEC 835-2 has been prepared by sub-
committee 12E: Radio relay and fixed satellite communication systems, of IEC technical
committee 12: Radiocommunications.
The text of this standard is based on the following documents:
DIS
Report on Voting
12E(CO)146 12E(CO)157
Full information on the voting for the approval of this standard can be found in the repo
rt
on voting indicated in the above table.

835-2-8 © IEC:1993 - 9 -
METHODS OF MEASUREMENT FOR EQUIPMENT
USED IN DIGITAL MICROWAVE RADIO
TRANSMISSIONS SYSTEMS
Part 2: Measurements on terrestrial radio-relay systems
Section 8: Adaptive equalizer
1 Scope
This section of IEC 835-2 deals with measurements pertaining to the adaptive equalizers
used in digital microwave radio-relay systems. These measurements are intended to
characterize the system equalizer in the presence of selective fading and may also be
performed on systems without adaptive equalizers.
To take account of those properties of the system which are especially influenced by the
use of frequency and/or time domain equalizers, the results of measurements performed
on the system are presented by so-called signatures. Additional measurements provide
further means to characterize the performance of the system.
2 General
The performance of a digital radio-relay link may be influenced by multipath pro-
pagation [1]*. This is especially true in the case of high capacity multi-state QAM systems.
In addition to reducing the received signal level, i.e. "flat fading", multipath propagation
results in linear distortion, i.e. "dispersive fading", producing amplitude and phase
distortion. Multistate modulation systems are especially vulnerable to this form of fading
(see 835-2-4: Part 2: Measurements on terrestrial radio-relay systems - Section 4:
Transmitter/receiver (in preparation)).
For a system operating under multipath propagation conditions the vulnerability of the
time-variant channel to linear distortion is of utmost impo rt
ance. In the majority of
high-capacity line-of-sight digital radio-relay systems, adaptive equalizers are used to
counteract "dispersive fading" in order to decrease outages.
The following types of equalizers are generally in use:
- frequency-domain equalizers, which are mainly, but not necessarily, implemented
at i.f, and
- time-domain equalizers, which are mainly, but not necessarily, implemented at
baseband.
The figures in square brackets refer to annex A.

835-2-8 ©IEC:1993 – 11 –
2.1
Frequency domain equalizer
It is the purpose of a frequency domain equalizer to correct the power density spectrum of
the received signal, which, for example, can be analyzed with the aid of a bank of band-
pass filters. Since there is usually no major redundant information in the transmitted
signal, it is not possible to gain any information about the phase or group delay distortion
of the channel; only the attenuation distortion can be recognized properly.
In some cases, the equalization network is of the minimum-phase type where the phase
and magnitude responses are linked to each other via the Hilbe
rt transform. If the channel
distortion is also of the minimum-phase type, then by equalizing the magnitude response
the phase response is equalized as well.
If the channel distortion is of the non-minimum phase type, for example in the case of two-
path propagation where the weaker signal arrives before the stronger signal at the
receiver site, the phase distortion may be increased and in some cases even doubled
when the attenuation is equalized. This is the basic shortcoming of such a frequency
domain equalizer.
Its main advantage, however, is that it will operate correctly, with ce
rtain limitations, with-
out any need for a recovered carrier signal (for synchronous demodulation), or for a recov-
ered timing signal (for making correct timing decisions). Therefore, in contrast to time
domain equalization systems, lock-in/lock-out properties need not be investigated.
2.2 Time domain equalizer
It is the purpose of a time domain equalizer to achieve an intersymbol-interference-free
(151-free) pulse shape at the input of the decision circuitry, although the channel itself may
cause a considerable amount of ISI due to multipath propagation.
Basically, time domain equalizers optimize the eye-opening either in the worst-case
sense, i.e. by using the zero-forcing algorithm, or in the minimum-mean-square-error
(MMSE) sense, i.e. using the MMSE algorithm [2]. For proper operation, they require at
least a correctly recovered timing signal. On the other hand, it is possible for the carrier-
and timing-recovery circuits to take advantage of the operation of the equalizer by using
the already equalized signal for the control of these loops.
By looking at the pulse response of the channel, time domain equalizers are usually
capable of counteracting both minimum and non-minimum phase channel distortion.
In general, multipath propagation causes not only distortion in the I-I path and in the Q-Q
path but also cross-talk contamination between the
quadrature signals in a QAM system,
(see figure 1). Therefore the time domain equalizer, if realized at baseband, shall have
equalizing circuits not only in the I-I and Q-Q path, but also in the I-Q and Q-I path (see
figure 2).
If this equalizer is realized at i.f., only two equalization networks may be used and it may
be possible to have only two independent controls.

835-2-8 © IEC:1993 - 13 -
2.3 Evaluation of system parameters influenced by the equalizers
To evaluate the properties of a radio-relay system with respect to selective fading the
impo rt
ant concept of the so-called signature is widely used. It is based on a two-path (two-
ray) propagation model [3]. Due to peculiarities which occur in connection with equalizers,
several variants of signature measurements are usually performed in addition to the basic
signature measurement given in IEC 835-2-4.
In IEC 835-2-4, the signature is defined as the locus in the relative echo-amplitude versus
notch offset-frequency plane or in the notch depth versus notch offset-frequency plane
along which the system shows a given state. For example this state is characterized
either by a specified bit-error ratio, BER, e.g. 10-3 or 10-6, or by "lock-in" or "lock-out"
conditions.
The relative echo-amplitude b is defined as the ratio of echo ray amplitude to direct ray
B
amplitude. The notch depth is defined as follows:

B = -20 log (1-b) for b<1
B =
-20 log (1-1/b) for b > 1
Note that the two-path delay difference has a fixed value for the signature measurement.
The calculation of the outage of a radio-relay system covers two main parts:
- channel statistics, and
- system properties.
The aim of the signature measurement is to characterize the system properties under
specific propagation conditions. The fixed 6.3 ns delay difference, used in the signature
measurement in accordance with [3], is not the average of a physical delay time, but only
rtant
a useful fitting parameter to match measured data and a numerical model. It is impo
to note that a consistent use of this fixed value of delay difference is also the basis for
using the signature for system comparison.
The outage signature defined below is an important special case of the general signature
definition.
All subsequent measurements are taken on systems equipped with or without equalizers,
not on isolated equalizers.
To quantitatively evaluate system performance under selective fading, a two-path simul-
ator is inserted into the signal path. With the aid of this simulator and additional measuring
equipment the behaviour of the system under the following situations is evaluated by the
measurements described below:
- A slow increase of two-path distortion until outage occurs:
. measurement of the "outage" signature. (The term signature without further
specification, in common use until now, is defined hereinafter as outage signature.)

835-2-8 © I EC:1993 –15 –
–
A slow decrease of two-path distortion after an outage caused by the most severe
selective fading:
• measurement of the "return" signature.
–
A fast variation of two-path channel parameters, at least notch frequency and notch
depth:
• measurements of the "dynamic" signature.
Sudden improvement of the channel after the most severe fading:
• values of the return signature;
• measurements of the recovery time.
The outage and return signatures are the bases for the calculation of the outage pro-
bability of the radio-relay system taking into account the propagation statistics of the hop
under consideration. The dynamic signature and the recovery time provide additional
information on the equalizers utilized.
Commercial two-path fading simulators are now available that can provide precise control
of notch depth, notch frequency and notch sweep-speed.
3 Outage signature
3.1 Definition and general considerations
Outage of a system is defined as having occurred either if a control loop locks out or if the
BER reaches a certain limit (this BER is named BERL, i.e. the bit error ratio limit).
It is possible during the measurement of the outage signature that wi
...