IEC 60825-1:2007/ISH1:2009
(Main)Interpretation sheet 1 - Safety of laser products - Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements
Interpretation sheet 1 - Safety of laser products - Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
– 1 –
Publication IEC 60825-1 (Second edition – 2007) I-SH 01
SAFETY OF LASER PRODUCTS –
Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements
INTERPRETATION SHEET 1
This interpretation sheet has been prepared by committee 76: Optical radiation safety and
laser equipment.
The text of this interpretation sheet is based on the following documents:
ISH Report on voting
76/415/ISH 76/418/RVD
Full information on the voting for the approval of this interpretation sheet can be found in the
report on voting indicated in the above table.
_____________
Subclauses 9.2 and 9.3
These subclauses are clarified by the following:
Introduction
For emissions in the wavelength range of 400 nm to 1 400 nm, the need to perform
measurements for Condition 2 (eye loupe viewing) can be greatly reduced by recognising that
Condition 3 (unaided viewing) in many cases will be the most restrictive criterion.
Interpretation
The following table outlines the process in this interpretation of IEC 60825-1, subclauses 9.2
and 9.3.
IF THEN
Angular Subtense > 1,5 mrad @ 100 mm from Condition 2 need not be considered
the reference point
Use simplified Condition 2, C = 1
Angular Subtense ≤ 1,5 mrad @ 100 mm; or
the angular subtense is not determined
Optional for intermediate sources: Angular CAN use Figure 5 (with C determined using
Figure 5) if simplified Condition 2 is too
Subtense ≤ 1,5 mrad @ 100 mm AND >
restrictive for the application
1,5 mrad using Figure 5
December 2009 ICS 13.110; 31.260
– 2 –
Rationale
Based on independent studies (see for instance reference [1]), it is found that for extended
sources and for radiation in the wavelength range of 400 nm to 1 400 nm, Condition 3 will in
most cases be more restrictive than Condition 2 for extended sources (Figure 5). The main
reason for this is the magnification of the source obtained with Condition 2. Also, the aperture
stop of Condition 2 is limited to 3,5 mm since it simulates a case where there is a high level of
ambient lighting, while Condition 3 uses a 7 mm aperture stop, as it simulates a general
viewing condition including accidental exposure.
Row 1 in the table above:
If it can be shown that the apparent source
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.