CLC/TS 50136-9:2013

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-junij-2014
Alarmni sistemi - Sistemi in oprema za prenos alarma - 1-7. del: Zahteve za skupni
protokol za prenos alarma po paketno komutiranem omrežju
Alarm systems - Alarm transmission systems and equipment - Part 1-7: Requirements
for common protocol for alarm transmission using packet switched network
Alarmanlagen - Alarmübertragungsanlagen und -einrichtungen - Teil 1-7: Anforderungen
an standardisierte Protokolle zur Alarmübertragung in Paketvermittlungsnetzwerken
Systèmes d'alarme - Systèmes et équipements de transmission d'alarme - Partie 1-7:
Exigences pour le protocole commun de transmission d'alarme utilisant les réseaux à
commutation de paquets
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CLC/TS 50136-9:2013
ICS:
13.320 Alarmni in opozorilni sistemi Alarm and warning systems
33.040.40 Podatkovna komunikacijska Data communication
omrežja networks
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
CLC/TS 50136-9
SPÉCIFICATION TECHNIQUE
January 2013
TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION
ICS 13.320; 33.040.40
English version
Alarm systems -
Alarm transmission systems and equipment -
Part 9: Requirements for common protocol for alarm transmission using
the Internet protocol
Systèmes d’alarmes -  Alarmanlagen -
Systèmes et équipements de transmission Alarmübertragungsanlagen und –
d’alarme - einrichtungen -
Partie 9 : Exigences pour le protocole Teil 9: Anforderungen an standardisierte
commun de transmission d’alarme Protokolle zur Alarmübertragung unter
utilisant le protocole Internet Nutzung des Internetprotokolls

This Technical Specification was approved by CENELEC on 2012-11-12.

CENELEC members are required to announce the existence of this TS in the same way as for an EN and to
make the TS available promptly at national level in an appropriate form. It is permissible to keep conflicting
national standards in force.
CENELEC members are the national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus,
the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany,
Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom.

CENELEC
European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization
Comité Européen de Normalisation Electrotechnique
Europäisches Komitee für Elektrotechnische Normung

Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B - 1000 Brussels

© 2013 CENELEC - All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CENELEC members.
Ref. No. CLC/TS 50136-9:2013 E

Contents
Foreword . 4
1 Scope . 5
2 Normative references . 5
3 Terms, definitions and abbreviations . 5
3.1 Terms and definitions . 5
3.2 Abbreviations . 5
4 Objective . 6
5 Messaging . 6
5.1 General . 6
5.2 Message format overview . 7
5.3 Padding and message length .11
5.4 Hashing .12
5.5 Encryption .12
5.6 Timeouts and retries .13
5.7 Version number .13
5.8 Reverse commands .13
5.9 Initial values .14
6 Message types .14
6.1 General .14
6.2 Path supervision .14
6.3 Event reporting .15
6.4 Configuration messages .19
7 Commissioning and connection setup .27
7.1 Commissioning .27
7.2 Connection setup .31
Annex A (normative) Result codes .32
Annex B (normative) Protocol Identifiers .33
Annex C (normative) Shared secret .34
C.1 Formatting of the shared secret.34
C.2 Checksum for Shared Secret Formatting .34
C.3 Example of Secret Encoding and Formatting .34
Annex D (informative) Examples of messaging sequences .35
D.1 Commissioning .35
D.2 Connection setup .38
Annex E (informative) Examples of application protocols .41
E.1 SIA .41
E.2 Ademco Contact ID .41
E.3 Scancom Fast Format .42
E.4 VdS 2465 .42
Annex F (informative) Design principles .44
F.1 General .44
F.2 Information Security .44
F.3 Use of UDP signalling .44
Bibliography .45

- 3 - CLC/TS 50136-9:2013
Table 1 – Identifiers . 7
Table 2– Basic unencrypted format of messages . 7
Table 3 – Basic encrypted format of messages . 8
Table 4 – Message ID overview . 10
Table 5 – Flags . 11
Table 6 – Hashing ID’s . 12
Table 7 – Encryption ID’s . 12
Table 8 – Reverse commands . 14
Table 9 – Initial values . 14
Table 10 – Poll message SPT   RCT . 15
Table 11 – Poll response RCT   SPT . 15
Table 12 – Event message format – SPT  RCT . 16
Table 13 – Event message format – Fields . 16
Table 14 – Event field . 16
Table 15 – Time event field . 17
Table 16 – Time message field. 17
Table 17 – Link field – IP Address . 17
Table 18 – Link field – IP Port number . 18
Table 19 – Link field – URL . 18
Table 20 – Link field – Filename . 18
Table 21 – Event response message format . 18
Table 22 – Connection handle request message format . 19
Table 23 – Connection handle response message format . 20
Table 24 – Device ID request message format. 20
Table 25 – Device ID request flags . 20
Table 26 – Device ID response message format . 21
Table 27 – Encryption selection request message format . 21
Table 28 – ‘Master Encryption Selection request’ flag . 21
Table 29 – Encryption selection response message format . 22
Table 30 – Encryption key exchange request message format . 22
Table 31 – ‘Master Key request’ flag . 22
Table 32 – Encryption key exchange response message format . 23
Table 33 – Hash selection request message format . 23
Table 34 – Hash selection response message format . 23
Table 35 – Path supervision request message format . 24
Table 36 – Path supervision response message format .
...