prEN 1779

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-januar-2025
Neporušitveno preskušanje - Preskus tesnosti - Kriteriji za izbiro metode in
postopka
Non-destructive testing - Leak testing - Criteria for method and technique selection
Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung - Dichtheitsprüfung - Kriterien zur Auswahl eines
Prüfverfahrens
Essais non destructifs - Contrôle d’étanchéité - Critères de choix d’une méthode et d’une
technique
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: prEN 1779
ICS:
19.100 Neporušitveno preskušanje Non-destructive testing
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

DRAFT
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
November 2024
ICS 19.100 Will supersede EN 1779:1999
English Version
Non-destructive testing - Leak testing - Criteria for method
and technique selection
Essais non destructifs - Contrôles d'étanchéité - Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung - Dichtheitsprüfung -
Critères de choix de la méthode et de la technique Kriterien zur Auswahl eines Prüfverfahrens
This draft European Standard is submitted to CEN members for enquiry. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee
CEN/TC 138.
If this draft becomes a European Standard, CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations
which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.

This draft European Standard was established by CEN in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other
language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC
Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are
aware and to provide supporting documentation.

Warning : This document is not a European Standard. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without
notice and shall not be referred to as a European Standard.

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2024 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. prEN 1779:2024 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 3
1 Scope . 4
2 Normative references . 4
3 Terms and definitions . 4
4 Personnel qualification . 4
5 Units . 4
6 Tightness requirements . 4
7 Leak testing methods and techniques . 5
7.1 General. 5
7.2 Techniques for leak location and techniques for measurement . 6
7.3 Time dependence (in tracer gas techniques) . 12
7.4 Influence of flow conditions . 13
7.4.1 General. 13
7.4.2 Influence of pressure . 13
7.4.3 Influence of temperature . 14
7.4.4 Nature of gas . 15
7.5 Influence of other factors . 15
8 General principles of method and technique selection . 15
8.1 General. 15
8.2 Range of leakage rates . 16
8.3 Test type: measure or localize . 16
8.4 Test object design . 16
8.5 Operation and testing conditions . 17
8.6 Safety and environmental factors . 17
8.6.1 Hazard due to a pressure differential . 17
8.6.2 Hazardous materials. 18
8.6.3 Electrical hazards . 18
Annex A (normative) Specific features of leak testing methods . 19
Annex B (informative) Conversion factors for leakage rate units. 27
Bibliography . 29

European foreword
This document (prEN 1779:2024) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 138 “Non-
destructive testing”, the secretariat of which is held by DIN (Germany).
This document is currently submitted to the CEN Enquiry.
This document will supersede EN 1779:1999.
a) update of the normative references;
b) Table 2 updated and figures added;
c) 8.1 added.
1 Scope
This document specifies criteria for the selection of the most suitable method and technique for the
assessment of leak tightness by indication or measurement of a gas leakage. Annex A, normative, allows
a comparison of standard test methods. Leak detection using hydrostatic tests, electromagnetic methods
is not included in this document.
This document can be used for equipment which can be evacuated or pressurized.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
EN ISO 20484:2017, Non-destructive testing — Leak testing — Vocabulary (ISO 20484:2017)
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in EN ISO 20484:2017, and the
following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
• IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
• ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp
4 Personnel qualification
It is assumed that leak testing is performed by qualified and capable personnel. In order to prove this
qualification, it is recommended to certify the personnel in accordance with EN ISO 9712:2022.
5 Units
The leakage rate is defined as the pV-throughput of a specific fluid which passes through a leak under
specific conditions and is expressed in pascal cubic metre per second.
In the past, the leakage rate was expressed in various units, these are given in informative Annex B,
Table B.1.
6 Tightness requirements
The leak tightness of an object is usually determined by measurement of its gas leakage rate.
Leak tightness is commonly described as the flow rate of fluid into or from the test object. For a gas, leak
tightness may be conveniently indicated by the variation of pressure with time under specified
conditions.
For testing, however, i.e. when drafting specifications and procedures, the leak tightness shall be
expressed as leakage rate in units of gas throughput (Pa·m /s) for a specific gas at specified temperature
and at specified pressure conditions.
Zero leakage rate shall not be specified. The required leak tightness shall be related to the function of the
object under consideration.
−4 3
EXAMPLE 1 Leakage rates in the order of 5 × 10 Pa·m /s are acceptable for compressed air cylinders. This
corresponds to a pressure variation of 5000 Pa in a 10 l volume in 24 h or 0,5 l loss measured at atmospheric
pressure.
−10 3 3
EXAMPLE 2 A leakage rate of 10 Pa·m /s is typical for cardiac pacemakers. This corresponds to a loss of 1 cm
every 30 years approximately.
The total tightness of a system can be considered in terms of tightness for all components of that system.
To meet requirements the sum of the leakage rates for each component plus the sum of the leakage rates
at each connecting point shall be less than the overall allowable leakage rate of the system.
The tightness of component or system shall be specified under normal operating conditions.
NOTE 1 The most significant influence on tightness is given by the nature and pressure of the gas, and by the
operating temperature.
The suitability of the system for a given task is indicated by the functional tightness.
NOTE 2 To take into account factors that are unquantifiable, it might be advisable to adopt leak tightness values
lower than this by a factor from three to ten.
7 Leak testing methods and techniques
7.1 General
The leak tightness of an object is usually determined by measurement of its gas leakage rate.
Leak tightness is commonly described as the flow rate of fluid into or from the test object. For a gas, leak
tightness may be conveniently indicated by the variation of pressure with time under specified
conditions.
The actual gas flow through the leaks of the test object, which has been determined in a leak test, shall be
converted to the leakage rate with that under operating conditions.
The following considerations shall be applied to all methods by which leakage rates are determined. A
review of the methods and techniques is given in Table 1.
Table 1 — Leak testing — Overview of methods and techniques
Flow Extent of
Applicability Techniques
direction test
Location B.1, B.2.2, B.4, C.3
Local
area
Measurement B.2.1, B.3, D.3
Gas flow
out of
object
Location C.1, C.2
Total
area
B.3, B.5, B.6, B.7, C.1,
Measurement
D.1, D.3, D.4
Location A.3
Local
area
Measurement A.2, D.3
Gas flow
into object
Location
Total
area
Measurement A.1, D.2, D.3, D.4
Application of Table 1:
1) Choose the appropriate flow direction for test.
2) Define the extent of the investigation: total or local area.
3) Define the aim of test: location or measurement.
4) Choose the appropriate method (A to D, from the normative
Annex A).
5) Check any practical difficulties associated with the test.
NOTE Some techniques used for location can also give an estimate
of the leakage size, but they are not allowed to demonstrate the
compliance with the specifications.
7.2 Techniques for leak location and techniques for measurement
It is usually not possible to establish in one step the total leakage of a component (or a system) and the
location of the leaks. Two techniques shall, therefore, be considered: measurement of the overall leakage
rate or location of leaks for possible elimination.
Examples of total (or integral) techniques include the measurement of the pressure variation with time
within the object and the accumulation of gas escaping from the object over a period of time.
One technique for leak location involves probing the object with a suitable tracer gas or sniffing the
surface of an object filled with tracer gas.
In the selection of an appropriate technique for leak assessment, the conditions of the test (pressure,
vacuum, type of gas, etc.) should be carefully considered. Some guidance is given in Clause 8.
...