Intelligent transport systems - ESafety - ECall end to end conformance testing for IMS packet switched based systems

This document defines the key actors in the eCall chain of service provision using IMS over packet switched networks (such as LTE/4G) as:
1) In-vehicle system (3.20) (IVS)/vehicle,
2) Mobile network Operator (MNO),
3) Public safety answering point (3.27) (PSAP),
and to provide conformance tests for actor groups 1) - 3).
NOTE 1 Conformance tests are not appropriate nor required for vehicle occupants (3.36), although they are the recipient of the service.
NOTE 2 Third party eCall systems (TPS eCall) are not within the scope of this deliverable. This is because the core TPS-eCall (3.32) standard (EN 16102) does not specify the communications link between the vehicle and the TPS service provider (3.29).
NOTE 3 These conformance tests are based an the appropriate conformance tests from EN 16454 which was published before Internet Protocol multimedia Systems (IMS) packet switched networks were available. This deliverable therefore replicates the appropriate tests from EN 16454 (and acknowledge their source); adapt and revise Conformance Test Protocols (CTP) from EN 16454 to an IMS paradigm; or provide new additional tests that are required for the IMS paradigm. Some 14 112-eCall (Pan European eCall) tests provided in EN 16454 are specific to GSM/UMTS circuit switched communications and not appropriate for the IMS paradigm and are therefore excluded from this deliverable.
This document therefore provides a suite of ALL conformance tests for IVS equipment, MNO's, and PSAPS, required to ensure and demonstrate compliance to CEN/TS 17184.
NOTE 4 Because in the event of non-viability or non-existence of an IMS supporting network at any particular time/location, IMS-eCall systems revert to CS networked eCall systems eCall via GSM/UMTS, IVS and PSAPs need to support, and prove compliance to both IMS and CS switched networks.
The Scope covers conformance testing (and approval) of new engineering developments, products and systems, and does not imply testing associated with individual installations in vehicles or locations.

Intelligente Verkehrssysteme - eSicherheit - eCall-Ende-zu-Ende Konformitätsprüfungen für IMS-paketvermittelte Systeme

Dieses Dokument unterstellt die Unterstützung von eCall von einem IVS und einer PSAP unter Verwendung von IMS über paketvermittelte Netzwerke und unterstellt zusätzlich, dass alle PLMNs, die dem IVS zum Zeitpunkt einer eCall- oder Prüf-eCall-Auslösung verfügbar sind, paketvermittelte Netzwerke sind. Die Unterstützung von eCall in Fällen, bei denen eCall unter Verwendung von IMS über paketvermittelte Netzwerke von einem IVS oder PSAP nicht unterstützt wird, liegt nicht im Anwendungsbereich dieses Dokuments.
Zu einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt werden nur noch paketvermittelte Netzwerke als öffentliche Mobilfunknetze (PLMN) zu Verfügung stehen. Trotzdem wird ETSI TS 122 003 eingesetzt werden, solange GSM/UMTS PLMNs verfügbar sind (Teledienst 12/TS12). Sowohl die Verwendung solcher PLMNs als auch die zugrundeliegende Logik, welche das angemessene Netzwerk in einer hybriden Situation auswählt (wo sowohl paketvermittelte und leitungsvermittelte Netzwerke verfügbar sind), liegen nicht im Anwendungsbereich dieses Dokumentes.
Dieses Dokument legt die Hauptakteure in der eCall-Dienstleistungskette unter Verwendung von IMS über paketvermittelte Netzwerke (wie etwa LTE/NR) fest, wie etwa:
1)   bordeigenes System (IVS)/Fahrzeug,
2)   Mobilfunkbetreiber (MNO),
3)   Notrufzentrale (PSAP),
und stellt Konformitätsprüfungen für die Akteurgruppen 1) – 3) bereit.
ANMERKUNG 1   Konformitätsprüfungen sind für Fahrzeuginsassen weder geeignet noch erforderlich, auch wenn sie Empfänger des Dienstes sind.
ANMERKUNG 2   eCall-Systeme von Drittanbietern (TPS eCall) sind nicht vom Anwendungsbereich dieses Normungsergebnisses umfasst. Dies liegt daran, dass die Hauptnorm zu TPS-eCall (EN 16102) den Kommunikationslink zwischen dem Fahrzeug und dem TPS-Dienstanbieter nicht festlegt.
ANMERKUNG 3   Diese Konformitätsprüfungen basieren auf den entsprechenden Konformitätsprüfungen nach EN 16454, die veröffentlicht wurde, bevor paketvermittelte Netzwerke für Internet-Protocol-Multimediasysteme (IMS) verfügbar waren. Diese Norm repliziert daher die entsprechenden Prüfungen aus EN 16454 (und gibt sie als Quelle an), ändert oder revidiert die Konformitätsprüfungsprozeduren (en: Conformance Test Procedures, CTP) aus EN 16454 in ein IMS-Paradigma oder bietet neue für das IMS-Paradigma erforderliche Prüfungen. Einige der in EN 16454 vorgesehene Prüfungen zum 112-eCall (gesamteuropäischer eCall) sind spezifisch für die leitungsvermittelte GSM/UMTS-Kommunikation und nicht für das IMS-Paradigma geeignet und daher von dieser Norm ausgeschlossen.
Dieses Dokument bietet daher ALLE Konformitätsprüfungen für IVS-Systeme, Mobilfunkbetreiber und Notrufzentralen, die erforderlich sind, um die Konformität nach EN 17184 sicherzustellen und nachzuweisen.
Der Anwendungsbereich umfasst die Konformitätsprüfung neuer technischer Entwicklungen, Produkte und Systeme und impliziert keine Prüfungen in Verbindung mit einzelnen Einbauten in Fahrzeugen oder an Standorten.

Systèmes de transport intelligents - ESafety - Essais de conformité du système eCall de bout en bout pour les systèmes IMS basés sur la commutation de paquets

Le présent document suppose que le service eCall est pris en charge avec un IMS utilisé par un IVS et un PSAP sur des réseaux à commutation de paquets. Il présuppose également que tous les RMTP disponibles pour un IVS au moment du déclenchement d'un eCall ou d'un eCall d'essai sont des réseaux à commutation de paquets. Le présent document ne couvre pas la prise en charge d'un eCall dans les cas où un IVS ou un PSAP ou un RMTP ne prend pas en charge l'eCall qui utilise un IMS sur un réseau à commutation de paquets.
À terme, les réseaux à commutation de paquets seront les seuls réseaux mobiles terrestres publics (RMTP) disponibles. Cependant, l'ETSI TS 122 003 demeurera opérationnelle aussi longtemps que les RMTP GSM/UMTS seront disponibles (Téléservice 12/TS12). L'utilisation de ces RMTP et la logique régissant le choix du réseau approprié dans une situation hybride (où des réseaux à commutation de paquets et à commutation de circuits coexistent) n'entrent pas dans le domaine d'application du présent document.
Le présent document spécifie les principaux acteurs de la chaîne de fourniture de services eCall utilisant l'IMS via des réseaux à commutation de paquets (LTE, NR et leurs successeurs), notamment :
1)   les systèmes embarqués (IVS)/véhicules,
2)   les opérateurs de réseaux mobiles (MNO),
3)   les points d'accès aux services de sécurité publique (PSAP).
Le présent document spécifie également les essais de conformité à réaliser pour les groupes d'acteurs 1) à 3).
NOTE 1   Les essais de conformité ne conviennent pas et ne sont pas exigés pour les occupants du véhicule, même si ces derniers sont les bénéficiaires du service.
NOTE 2   Les systèmes eCall privés (SFP-eCall) ne relèvent pas du domaine d'application du présent document. En effet, la norme de base relative aux SFP-eCall (EN 16102) ne spécifie pas le lien de communication entre le véhicule et le fournisseur de services privé.
NOTE 3   Ces essais de conformité sont basés sur les essais de conformité appropriés de l'EN 16454 qui a été publiée avant l'émergence des réseaux à commutation de paquets basés sur des systèmes IMS (Internet Protocol Multimedia System). Le présent document reproduit donc les essais appropriés de l'EN 16454 (avec référence de leur source) ; adapte et révise les procédures d'essai de conformité (CTP) de l'EN 16454 dans le contexte de l'IMS ; ou fournit de nouveaux essais supplémentaires qui sont nécessaires pour le contexte de l'IMS. Certains essais du service 112-eCall (service eCall paneuropéen) spécifiés dans l'EN 16454 sont spécifiques aux communications GSM/UMTS à commutation de circuits et ne conviennent pas au contexte de l'IMS ; ils sont donc exclus du présent document.
Le présent document fournit donc une suite d'essais de conformité complète pour les équipements IVS, les MNO et les PSAP, nécessaires pour assurer et démontrer la conformité à la prEN 17184.
Le domaine d'application couvre les essais de conformité des nouveaux développements techniques, produits et systèmes et n'implique pas les essais associés aux installations individuelles dans les véhicules ou sur les sites.

Inteligentni transportni sistemi - e-Varnost - Preskušanje skladnosti e-klica v zvezi pošiljatelj-prejemnik za paketno preklopne sisteme IMS

Ta dokument opredeljuje naslednje ključne udeležence v verigi e-klica pri izvajanju storitve z uporabo IMS prek paketno preklopnih omrežij (kot je LTE/4G):
1) avtomobilski sistem (3.20) (IVS)/vozilo,
2) operaterji mobilnih omrežij (MNO),
3) odzivna točka javne varnosti (3.27) (PSAP)
in zagotavlja preskuse skladnosti za skupine udeležencev od 1) do 3).
OPOMBA 1: Preskusi skladnosti niso primerni in zahtevani za potnike v vozilu (3.36), čeprav so prejemniki storitve.
OPOMBA 2: Sistemi za e-klice tretje strani (TPS e-klic) ne spadajo na področje uporabe tega dokumenta. Temeljni standard o sistemih za e-klice tretje strani (3.32) (EN 16102) namreč ne določa komunikacijske povezave med vozilom in ponudnikom storitev sistema tretje strani (3.29).
OPOMBA 3: Ti preskusi skladnosti temeljijo na ustreznih preskusih skladnosti iz standarda EN 16454, ki je bil objavljen, preden so bila na voljo paketno preklopna omrežja z večpredstavnostnimi sistemi internetnega protokola (IMS). Ta dokument tako ponavlja ustrezne preskuse iz standarda EN 16454 (in navaja njihov vir), prilagaja in revidira protokole za preskuse skladnosti (CTP) iz standarda EN 16454 paradigmi IMS ali podaja nove dodatne preskuse, ki so zahtevani za paradigmo IMS. 14 preskusov 112-e-klica (vseevropski elektronski klic v sili), podanih v standardu EN 16454, je značilnih za vodovno komutirano komunikacijo in ni ustreznih za paradigmo IMS, zaradi česar so izključeni iz tega dokumenta.
Ta dokument tako določa paket VSEH preskusov skladnosti za opremo IVS, operaterje mobilnega omrežja in odzivne točke javne varnosti, ki so zahtevani za zagotavljanje in prikazovanje skladnosti s standardom CEN/TS 17184.
OPOMBA 4: Ker v primeru neuspešnega delovanja ali neobstoja omrežja, ki podpira IMS, ob katerem koli času/na kateri koli lokaciji, sistemi za e-klice IMS preidejo na sisteme za e-klice v vodovno komutiranem omrežju prek GSM/UMTS, morata IVS in odzivna točka javne varnosti podpreti ter zagotoviti skladnost z omrežjem IMS in vodovno komutiranim omrežjem.
Področje uporabe zajema preskuse skladnosti (in potrditev) novih inženirskih dosežkov, izdelkov in sistemov ter ne zahteva preskusov, povezanih s posameznimi vgradnjami v vozila ali na lokacije.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
03-Dec-2024
Current Stage
6060 - Definitive text made available (DAV) - Publishing
Start Date
04-Dec-2024
Due Date
19-Mar-2025
Completion Date
04-Dec-2024

Relations

Standard
EN 17240:2025 - BARVE
English language
188 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)


SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-marec-2025
Nadomešča:
SIST-TS CEN/TS 17240:2019
Inteligentni transportni sistemi - e-Varnost - Preskušanje skladnosti e-klica v zvezi
pošiljatelj-prejemnik za paketno preklopne sisteme IMS
Intelligent transport systems - ESafety - ECall end to end conformance testing for IMS
packet switched based systems
Intelligente Verkehrssysteme - eSicherheit - eCall-Ende-zu-Ende Konformitätsprüfungen
für IMS-paketvermittelnde Systeme
Systèmes de transport intelligents - ESafety - Essais de conformité du système eCall de
bout en bout pour les systèmes IMS basés sur la commutation de paquets
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 17240:2024
ICS:
35.240.60 Uporabniške rešitve IT v IT applications in transport
prometu
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EN 17240
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
December 2024
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 35.240.60 Supersedes CEN/TS 17240:2018
English Version
Intelligent transport systems - ESafety - ECall end to end
conformance testing for IMS packet switched based
systems
Systèmes de transport intelligents - ESafety - Essais de Intelligente Verkehrssysteme - eSicherheit - eCall-
conformité du système eCall de bout en bout pour les Ende-zu-Ende Konformitätsprüfungen für IMS-
systèmes IMS basés sur la commutation de paquets paketvermittelnde Systeme
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 6 October 2024.

CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2024 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN 17240:2024 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 7
Introduction . 8
1 Scope . 9
2 Normative references . 9
3 Terms and definitions . 10
4 Symbols and abbreviations . 15
5 Conformance . 16
5.1 General . 16
5.2 General conditions . 16
6 General overview of the eCall transaction for pan-European eCall . 16
7 How to use this Standard . 21
7.1 Layout and procedures . 21
7.2 System under test . 21
7.3 Accelerated test procedures . 22
7.4 Accelerated test procedures for IVSs . 22
7.4.1 Accelerated test procedures for all types of IVS . 22
7.4.2 Additional accelerated test procedures for eCall-only IVS . 24
7.5 Accelerated test procedures for MNOs . 25
7.6 Accelerated test procedures for PSAPs . 26
8 Requirements . 27
8.1 Requirements General objectives . 27
8.1.1 State transitions. 27
8.1.2 Classification of testing . 33
8.1.3 CTP naming conventions . 35
8.1.4 CTP naming convention for IVS conformance tests . 35
8.2 CTP structure . 36
8.3 IMS-eCall timers . 37
9 Conformance test requirements for in-vehicle user equipment and systems (IVS) . 37
9.1 Conformance test requirements for in-vehicle user equipment and systems for IMS-
eCall . 37
9.2 Test objectives and purposes . 37
9.3 Taxonomy of testing . 37
9.4 State transition conformance tests for in-vehicle equipment and system to comply to
Standards for IMS-eCall . 38
9.4.1 Use case test objectives by stage . 38
9.4.2 CTP 1.1.0.1 Conformance to ETSI TS 136 523, ETSI TS 138 523 and ETSI TS 134 229 -
IVS . 41
9.4.3 CTP 1.1.0.2 Conformance to valid SIM/USIM - IVS . 42
9.4.4 CTP 1.1.0.3 Automatic eCall triggering does not occur when engine control OFF - IVS . 43
9.4.5 CTP 1.1.1.1 Power on and self-test - IVS . 44
9.4.6 CTP 1.1.2.1 eCall automatically activated - IVS. 45
9.4.7 CTP 1.1.2.2 Automatically triggered eCall in progress was not disconnected upon a
new eCall trigger - IVS . 46
9.4.8 CTP 1.1.2.3 Post-Lateral-crash performance of automatic trigger - IVS . 47
9.4.9 CTP 1.1.2.4 Post-frontal-crash performance of automatic trigger - IVS . 48
9.4.10 CTP 1.1.2.5 Performance of automatic trigger – Different crash types - IVS . 49
9.4.11 CTP 1.1.3.1 eCall manually activated - IVS . 50
9.4.12 CTP 1.1.3.2 Manually triggered eCall in progress was not disconnected upon a new
eCall trigger - IVS . 51
9.4.13 CTP 1.1.4.1 Test eCall activated - IVS . 52
9.4.14 CTP 1.1.5.1 Network registration - IVS. 53
9.4.15 CTP 1.1.5.2 Manual termination of eCall by vehicle occupants not allowed
(automatically triggered eCall) - IVS . 54
9.4.16 CTP 1.1.5.3.1 Manual termination of eCall by vehicle occupants not allowed
(manually triggered eCall) - IVS . 55
9.4.17 CTP 1.1.5.3.2 Manual termination of eCall by vehicle occupants allowed (manually
triggered eCall) - IVS . 56
9.4.18 CTP 1.1.5.4 Automatically triggered eCall in progress was not disconnected when
engine control is switched to OFF - IVS . 57
9.4.19 CTP 1.1.5.5 Manually triggered eCall in progress was not disconnected when engine
control is switched to OFF - IVS . 58
9.4.20 CTP 1.1.5.6 Priority over conflicting communication - IVS . 59
9.4.21 CTP 1.1.6.2 SIP Invite sent - IVS . 60
9.4.22 CTP 1.1.7.1 Establish session with urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic - IVS . 61
9.4.23 CTP 1.1.8.1 Establish session with urn:service:sos.ecall.manual - IVS . 62
9.4.24 CTP 1.1.9.1 Establish session with urn:service:test.sos.ecall - IVS . 63
9.4.25 CTP 1.1.10.1 eCall is attempted when no networks are available (limited service
condition) - IVS . 64
9.4.26 CTP 1.1.10.2 Redial attempt completed within 2 min after eCall is dropped - IVS . 65
9.4.27 CTP 1.1.10.5 Test eCall is not attempted in limited service condition - IVS . 66
9.4.28 CTP 1.1.10.6 Remain registered after eCall is rejected and MSD acknowledged - IVS . 67
9.4.29 CTP 1.1.10.7 Redial after eCall is rejected and negative AL-ACK - IVS . 68
9.4.30 CTP 1.1.10.8 Redial after eCall is rejected and missing AL-ACK - IVS . 69
9.4.31 CTP 1.1.10.9 Redial after eCall is not answered - IVS . 70
9.4.32 CTP 1.1.10.10 Negative AL-ACK for initial MSD - IVS . 71
9.4.33 CTP 1.1.10.11 Missing AL-ACK for initial MSD - IVS . 72
9.4.34 CTP 1.1.10.12 IMS emergency call is attempted when no networks with set IMS eCall
support indicator are available - IVS . 73
9.4.35 CTP 1.1.10.13 eCall is attempted when no networks with set IMS eCall support
indicator are available - IVS . 74
9.4.36 CTP 1.1.10.14 IVS logs if initial MSD is not acknowledged - IVS . 75
9.4.37 CTP 1.1.11.1 Send MSD with indicator set to automatic eCall activation - IVS . 76
9.4.38 CTP 1.1.12.1 Send MSD to indicate manual eCall activation - IVS . 77
9.4.39 CTP 1.1.13.1 Send MSD to indicate test Call activation - IVS . 78
9.4.40 CTP 1.1.15.1 Voice link established - IVS . 79
9.4.41 CTP 1.1.15.2 New/updated MSD received while eCall conversation in progress - IVS . 80
9.4.42 CTP 1.1.15.3 New/updated MSD while eCall conversation in progress after negative
AL-ACK for initial MSD - IVS . 81
9.4.43 CTP 1.1.15.4 New/updated MSD while eCall conversation in progress after negative
AL-ACK for initial MSD and MSD transfer via in-band modem - IVS . 82
9.4.44 CTP 1.1.15.5 New/updated MSD while eCall conversation in progress after missing
AL-ACK for initial MSD - IVS . 84
9.4.45 CTP 1.1.15.6 New/updated MSD while eCall conversation in progress after missing
AL-ACK for initial MSD and MSD transfer via in-band modem - IVS . 85
9.4.46 CTP 1.1.16.2 IVS clears down the eCall upon timer T2 expiry - IVS . 87
9.4.47 CTP 1.1.16.3 IVS registers recent eCalls - IVS . 88
9.4.48 CTP 1.1.17.1 Call-back allowed and able to be answered by IVS - IVS . 89
9.4.49 CTP 1.1.17.2 Call-back answered by IVS in the event of abnormal termination - IVS . 90
9.4.50 CTP 1.1.17.3 MSD transfer occurs upon PSAP request during call-back - IVS . 91
9.4.51 CTP 1.1.17.4 Remain registered for ≥ 1 hr - IVS . 92
9.4.52 CTP 1.1.17.6 No redial attempt in the event of abnormal termination after MSD ACK -
IVS . 93
9.4.53 CTP 1.1.17.7 Capacity of backup battery - IVS . 94
9.4.54 CTP 1.1.18.1 Compliance with MSD version 3 - IVS . 95
9.4.55 CTP 1.1.18.2 MSD transfer using in-band modem after negative AL-ACK - IVS . 96
9.4.56 CTP 1.1.18.3 MSD transfer using in-band modem after missing AL-ACK - IVS . 97
9.4.57 CTP 1.1.18.4 Conformance to ETSI TS 126 269 - IVS. 99
9.4.58 CTP 1.1.18.5 MSD transfer using IPv4 - IVS . 100
9.4.59 CTP 1.1.18.6 MSD transfer using IPv6 - IVS . 101
9.4.60 CTP 1.1.18.7 Compliance of MSD with additional data from Euro NCAP TB 040:2022 -
IVS . 102
9.5 State transition test descriptions for in-vehicle equipment and system to comply to
Standards for IMS-eCall – additional tests for eCall-only systems . 103
9.5.1 General . 103
9.5.2 CTP 1.1.1.2 IVS does not perform registration after power-up - eCall-only IVS . 105
9.5.3 CTP 1.1.10.4 Verify that PLMN registration procedure is executed upon initiating an
eCall - eCall-only IVS . 106
9.5.4 CTP 1.1.17.5 Remain registered for ≥ 1 hr ≤ 12 hr - eCall-only IVS . 107
10 Conformance tests for mobile network operators . 108
10.1 Test objectives and purposes . 108
10.1.1 General . 108
10.1.2 Default assumptions . 108
10.2 Taxonomy of testing and referenced tests . 108
10.3 Use case conformance tests for mobile network operator systems to comply to
Standards for IMS-eCall . 108
10.3.1 Conformance requirement . 108
10.3.2 Use case test objectives by stage . 108
10.4 State transition test descriptions for mobile network operators to demonstrate
compliance with IMS-eCall standards . 109
10.4.1 General . 109
10.4.2 CTP 2.0.1 Keep SIMs/USIMs/eSIMs alive even though not in regular operation - MNO . 111
10.4.3 CTP 2.0.2 MNO supports general eCall relevant requirements - MNO . 112
10.4.4 CTP 2.0.4 Support IMS-eCall routing - MNO . 114
10.4.5 CTP 2.1.2 Accept registration – Roaming - MNO . 115
10.4.6 CTP 2.2.1.1 Establish automatically initiated eCall - MNO . 116
10.4.7 CTP 2.2.1.2 Route call to ‘most appropriate’ PSAP - MNO . 117
10.4.8 CTP 2.2.1.3 Provide IMS emergency data/caller ID - MNO . 118
10.4.9 CTP 2.2.1.4 Initial MSD transfer in an automatically initiated eCall - MNO . 119
10.4.10 CTP 2.2.2.1 Establish manually initiated eCall - MNO . 120
10.4.11 CTP 2.2.2.4 Initial MSD transfer in a manually initiated eCall - MNO . 121
10.4.12 CTP 2.2.3.1 Establish test eCall - MNO . 122
10.4.13 CTP 2.2.3.3 Provide test eCall data - MNO . 123
10.4.14 CTP 2.2.3.4 Initial MSD transfer in a test eCall - MNO . 124
10.4.15 CTP 2.3.1.1 MSD transfer using IPv4 - MNO . 125
10.4.16 CTP 2.3.1.2 MSD transfer using IPv6 - MNO . 126
10.4.17 CTP 2.3.1.3 New MSD transfer before call clear-down - MNO . 127
10.4.18 CTP 2.3.1.4 New MSD transfer using in-band modem before call clear-down -
MNO . 128
10.4.19 CTP 2.5.1 Support call-back - MNO . 129
10.4.20 CTP 2.5.2 New MSD transfer during call-back - MNO . 130
10.4.21 CTP 2.5.3 Support call-back - Roaming - MNO . 131
11 Conformance tests for PSAP systems. 132
11.1 Test objectives and purposes . 132
11.2 Taxonomy of testing . 132
11.3 Use case conformance tests for PSAP systems to comply to Standards for IMS-eCall . 132
11.3.1 Conformance requirement . 132
11.3.2 Use case test objectives by stage . 132
11.4 State transition conformance tests for PSAPs – IMS-eCall . 133
11.4.1 General . 133
11.4.2 CTP 3.1.0.1 Provide MNOs with appropriate routing data - Member State/ PSAP. 135
11.4.3 CTP 3.1.0.2 Maintain map geo-information - PSAP. 136
11.4.4 CTP 3.1.1.1 Receive automatically initiated eCall - PSAP . 137
11.4.5 CTP 3.1.1.2 Receive manually initiated eCall - PSAP . 138
11.4.6 CTP 3.1.1.3 Receive test eCall - PSAP . 139
11.4.7 CTP 3.1.2 Interpret IMS emergency data - Caller ID and location - PSAP . 140
11.4.8 CTP 3.1.7.1 Receive MSD - PSAP . 141
11.4.9 CTP 3.1.7.5 Verify PSAP behaviour when MSD format check fails - PSAP . 142
11.4.10 CTP 3.1.7.6 Verify PSAP behaviour when MSD contains unknown optional
additional data set - PSAP . 143
11.4.11 CTP 3.1.7.7 Verify PSAP behaviour when MSD contains ASN.1 extended data-
elements - PSAP . 144
11.4.12 CTP 3.1.7.8 Verify PSAP behaviour when MSD contains ASN.1 extended data-
values - PSAP . 145
11.4.13 CTP 3.1.7.9 Compliance with MSD version 2 - PSAP. 146
11.4.14 CTP 3.1.7.10 Compliance with MSD version 3 - PSAP . 147
11.4.15 CTP 3.1.7.11 Request MSD using in-band modem - PSAP . 148
11.4.16 CTP 3.1.7.12 Receive MSD using in-band modem - PSAP . 150
11.4.17 CTP 3.1.7.13 Receive MSD using IPv4 - PSAP . 152
11.4.18 CTP 3.1.7.14 Receive MSD using IPv6 - PSAP . 153
11.4.19 CTP 3.1.7.15 eCall is rejected and MSD acknowledged - PSAP . 154
11.4.20 CTP 3.1.7.16 MSD corrupted - PSAP . 155
11.4.21 CTP 3.1.7.17 Compliance of MSD with additional data from Euro NCAP TB
040:2022 - PSAP . 156
11.4.22 CTP 3.1.9 Route voice and MSD to operator - PSAP. 158
11.4.23 CTP 3.1.10 Display IMS-eCall data and MSD to operator - PSAP . 159
11.4.24 CTP 3.1.11 Decode VIN - PSAP . 160
11.4.25 CTP 3.1.12 Talk to vehicle occupants - PSAP . 161
11.4.26 CTP 3.1.13 Request new MSD before call clear-down - PSAP . 162
11.4.27 CTP 3.1.14.1 Call clear-down - PSAP . 163
11.4.28 CTP 3.1.15 Call-back to vehicle - PSAP . 164
11.4.29 CTP 3.1.16 Request new/updated MSD after call clear-down - PSAP . 165
11.4.30 CTP 3.1.17 Record of not handled eCall - PSAP . 166
12 Marking, labelling and packaging . 167
13 Declaration of patents and intellectual property . 167
Annex A (informative) MSD examples for special PSAP tests . 168
A.1 General . 168
A.2 Example: standard MSD (version 3) . 168
A.3 Example: standard MSD (version 3) with ‘unknown’ OAD . 171
A.4 Example: MSD (version 3) with extended data-elements . 174
A.5 Example: MSD (version 3) with extended data-values. 180
Annex B (informative) Relation to EN 16454 . 185
B.1 General . 185
B.2 Relation of IVS tests . 185
B.3 Relation of MNO tests . 186
B.4 Relation of PSAP tests . 187
Bibliography . 188

European foreword
This document (EN 17240:2024) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 278 “Intelligent
transport systems”, the secretariat of which is held by NEN.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by June 2025, and conflicting national standards shall be
withdrawn at the latest by June 2025.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
This document supersedes CEN/TS 17240:2018.
Part of this revision of the document has been aimed at making the document pure packet switched and
removing references to eCall over circuit switched networks, this in order to make the document future
proof.
The following changes have been introduced in this revision:
— Tests added to check for compliance with MSD version 3
— Tests added to check for support of IPv4 and IPv6
— Tests added to check for MSD transfer using in-band modem
— Tests added to check for compliance with additional data from Euro NCAP
— IVS tests added to check for special cases of eCall attempts
— IVS test added to check for capacity of backup battery
— PSAP test added to check for compliance with MSD version 2
— PSAP tests added to check for ASN.1 compliance
— Corrections in multiple tests, figures and tables
— Added Annex A and B
Any feedback and questions on this document should be directed to the users’ national standards body.
A complete listing of these bodies can be found on the CEN website.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organisations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia,
Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland,
Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North
Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and the United
Kingdom.
Introduction
An eCall is an emergency call generated either automatically via activation of in-vehicle sensors or
manually by the vehicle occupants; when activated, to provide notification and relevant location
information to the most appropriate Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP), by means of mobile wireless
communications networks and carries a defined standardized minimum set of data, notifying that there
has been an incident that requires response from the emergency services and establishes an audio
channel between the occupants of the vehicle and the most appropriate PSAP.
NOTE 1 EN 15722 specifies a standardized MSD for eCall, EN 16062 specifies high level application protocols for
eCall using GSM/UMTS circuit switched networks, EN 17184 specifies eCall high level application protocols using
IP Multimedia Subsystem over packet switched networks and EN 16072 specifies pan-European eCall operating
requirements. For third party systems, EN 16102 specifies third party services supporting eCall operating
requirements. (See EC Communication on eCall Implementation 2009 [COM(2009) 434 final] for more information.)
The operating requirements for pan-European eCall are made using Public Land Mobile Networks
(PLMN) (such as GSM and 3G), as specified in a number of ETSI standards and technical specifications.
While EN 16062 provided high level application protocols (HLAP) for eCall using GSM/UMTS circuit
switched networks, a new Standards Deliverable prEN 17184 has been developed for the provision of
eCall using IMS over packet switched networks.
European Regulations require support of eCall by vehicle manufacturers, other eCall IVS manufacturers,
MNO’s and PSAPs. (See Clause 2, Normative References).
This Standards Deliverable provides a complete suite for the support of IMS-eCall and may be used to test
IMS-eCall aspects of eCall service provision. Where appropriate, the tests of EN 16454 are replicated,
revised or replaced. Annex A shows the relation of the tests specified in this Standards Deliverable to the
tests specified in EN 16454. EN 16454 Conformance Tests that are required in a GSM/UMTS environment
but not appropriate in an IMS environment are removed. Where new conformance tests are required for
IMS, they have been added as new tests.
This deliverable provides tests to enable actors in the eCall chain to be able to claim conformance to the
IMS-eCall standards, even though they are unable to control the behaviour of systems of other actors in
the eCall chain.
NOTE 2 Conformance tests in this document allow demonstration that a system complies with the IMS-eCall
Standards. Compliance to Standards is a prerequisite to providing an interoperable compliant system, but do not by
themselves demonstrate that a system will function nor guarantee the quality of service.
NOTE 3 The term PSAP (Public Safety Answering Point), which is most widely used in the eCall documentation,
European Commission documents, etc., is used throughout this document and equates to the term emergency call
response centre used in the ITS Implementation Directive.
The European Committee for Standardization (CEN) draws attention to the fact that it is claimed that
compliance with this European Standard may involve the use of patents concerning eCall given in
EN 16062 and various ETSI standards for the network access device and cellular mobile networks.
CEN takes no position concerning the evidence, validity and scope of these patent rights.
1 Scope
This document assumes support of eCall using IMS over packet switched networks by an IVS and a PSAP
and further assumes that all PLMNs available to an IVS at the time an eCall or test eCall is initiated are
packet switched networks. Support of eCall where eCall using IMS over packet switched networks is not
supported by an IVS or PSAP is out of scope of this document.
At some moment in time packet switched networks will be the only Public Land Mobile Networks (PLMN)
available. However, as long as GSM/UMTS PLMNs are available (Teleservice 12/TS12), ETSI TS 122 003
will remain operational. Both the use of such PLMNs and the logic behind choosing the appropriate
network in a hybrid situation (where both packet-switched and circuit-switched networks are available)
are out of scope of this document.
This document specifies the key actors in the eCall chain of service provision using IMS over packet
switched networks (such as LTE, NR and their successors) as:
1) In-Vehicle System (IVS)/vehicle,
2) Mobile Network Operator (MNO),
3) Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP),
and to provide conformance tests for actor groups 1) – 3).
NOTE 1 Conformance tests are not appropriate nor required for vehicle occupants, although they are the
recipient of the service.
NOTE 2 Third party eCall systems (TPS-eCall) are not within the scope of this deliverable. This is because the
core TPS-eCall standard (EN 16102) does not specify the communications link between the vehicle and the TPS
service provider.
NOTE 3 These conformance tests are based on the appropriate conformance tests from EN 16454 which was
published before Internet Protocol multimedia Systems (IMS) packet switched networks were available. This
deliverable therefore replicates the appropriate tests from EN 16454 (and acknowledge their source); adapt and
revise Conformance Test Procedures (CTP) from EN 16454 to an IMS paradigm; or provide new additional tests
that are required for the IMS paradigm. Some 112-eCall (Pan European eCall) tests provided in EN 16454 are
specific to GSM/UMTS circuit switched communications and not appropriate for the IMS paradigm and are therefore
excluded from this deliverable.
This document therefore provides a suite of ALL conformance tests for IVS equipment, MNO’s, and PSAPs,
required to ensure and demonstrate compliance to prEN 17184.
The scope covers conformance testing of new engineering developments, products and systems, and does
not imply testing associated with individual installations in vehicles or locations.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 15722:2020, Intelligent transport systems — eSafety — ECall minimum set of data
EN 16072:2022, Intelligent transport systems — eSafety — Pan—European eCall operating requirements
EN 17184:2024, Intelligent transport systems — eSafety — eCall High level application Protocols (HLAP)
using IMS packet switched networks
ETSI TS 123 401, LTE; General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) enhancements for Evolved Universal Terrestrial
Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) access (3GPP TS 23.401)
ETSI TS 123 501, 5G; System architecture for the 5G System (5GS) (3GPP TS 23.501)
ETSI TS 131 102, Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Characteristics of the
Universal Subscriber Identity Module (USIM) application (3GPP TS 31.102)
ETSI TS 134 229-1 V17.1.0 (2024-07)or later, Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE;
Internet Protocol (IP) multimedia call control protocol based on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session
Description Protocol (SDP); User Equipment (UE) conformance specification; Part 1: Protocol conformance
specification (3GPP TS 34.229-1 version 17.1.0)
ETSI TS 134 229-5 V17.1.0 (2024-08) or later, 5G; Internet Protocol (IP) multimedia call control protocol
based on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session Description Protocol (SDP); User Equipment (UE)
conformance specification; Part 5: Protocol conformance specification using 5G System (5GS) (3GPP TS
34.229-5 version 17.1.0)
ETSI TS 136 523-1 V18.5.0 (2024-08) or later, LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA)
and Evolved Packet Core (EPC); User Equipment (UE) conformance specification; Part 1: Protocol
conformance specification (3GPP TS 36.523-1 version 18.5.0)
ETSI TS 138 523-1 V17.7.0 (2024-08) or later, 5G; LTE; 5GS; User Equipment (UE) conformance
specification; Part 1: Protocol (3GPP TS 38.523-1 version 17.1.0)
ETSI TS 126 269 V18.0.0 (2024-05) or later, Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+) (GSM);
Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); eCall data transfer; In-band modem solution;
Conformance testing (3GPP TS 26.269 version 17.0.0 Release 17)
ISO/IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
ITU-T P.1140, SERIES P: TELEPHONE TRANSMISSION QUALITY, TELEPHONE INSTALLATIONS, LOCAL
LINE NETWORKS; Communications involving vehicles; Speech communication requirements for emergency
calls originating from vehicles
Euro NCAP TB 040:2022 V1.0.0, eCall Additional Data Concept Triggering Incident
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
• IEC Electropedia: available at http://www.electropedia.org/
• ISO Online browsing platform: available at http://www.iso.org/obp
3.1
single European emergency call number supporting ‘Teleservice 12’
Note 1 to entry: See ETSI TS 122 003.
3.2
call clear-down
act of ending a call, following call completion, which is signalled in accordance with ISUP (ISDN User Part)
‘Release Cause Codes’ (usually achieved by hanging up the receiver or pressing ‘end call’ or similar on
screen)
3.3
contracting MNO
mobile network operator which has responsibility for provisioning and managing a specific SIM
3.4
cellular network
wireless communications network consisting of multiple adjacent access points (cells) with the capability
of homogeneous transfer of a communications session instance to an adjacent cell without significant
interruption to the session
3.5
conformance test point
point which may be an actual instantiation of equipment performing a conformance test process ‘live’,
using ‘live’ equipment or may be equipment/systems that simulate behaviour of equipment at the point
being tested in order to stimulate or observe the behaviour resultant from the stimulation and note the
result of that simulation
3.6
data
representations of static or dynamic objects in a formalized manner suitable for communication,
interpretation, or processing by humans or by machines
3.7
data concept
concept of a group of data structures (i.e. object class, property, value domain, data elements, message,
interface dialogue, association) referring to abstractions or things in the natural world that can be
identified with explicit boundaries and meaning and whose properties and behaviour all follow the same
rules
3.8
data element
single unit of information of interest (such as a fact, proposition, observation, etc.) about some (entity)
class of interest (e.g. a person, place, process, property, concept, state, event) considered to be indivisible
in a particular context
3.9
eCall
emergency call generated either automatically via activation of in-vehicle sensors or manually by the
vehicle occupants, which, when activated, provides notification and relevant location information to the
most appropriate Public Safety Answering Point, by means of mobile wireless communic
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...